Casting Simulation of Automotive Wheel Rim Using Aluminium Alloy Material
Casting Simulation of Automotive Wheel Rim Using Aluminium Alloy Material
Casting Simulation of Automotive Wheel Rim Using Aluminium Alloy Material
Abstract
1. Introduction
Wheel rims are the most used in general vehicles. These are manufactured by either
casting or forging. Forged components were of high cost and low strength mechanical
properties compared to the alloy based wheel rims.
Aluminium alloy based wheel rims were later come in to the focus cause of high
strength mechanical properties, light in weight and flexible to repair compared to
forged rims. ProCAST is a three dimensional solidification and fluid flow package
which is developed to perform numerical simulation of molten metal flow and
solidification phenomena in various casting processes, primarily die casting (gravity,
low pressure and high pressure die casting) and sand casting. It is particularly helpful
for foundry applications to visualize and predict the casting results. ProCAST
42 K. Shailender Kumar & Dr. K. Srinivasulu Reddy
extensively prior to create sand casting and die casting models for the simulation of
mold filling and solidification. We prefer to use die casting rather than sand casting for
better properties. The cast and mold design of the experiment is transformed into a 3D
model and imported into ProCAST to conduct the casting process simulation. In the
present work, simulation of mold filling and solidification of alloy steel castings are
carried out.
Fig. 1.1 (a) System of simulation Fig. 1.1(b)3D model of wheel rim
Fig. 1.1(a) is the tree diagram for system of simulation &Fig. 1.1(b) shows 3D
model of wheel rim CAD model and for which simulation tools are utilized to improve
the casting process design. Computer simulation based on the design procedures
described above have been implemented with one example. Let's consider automotive
Casting Simulation of Automotive Wheel Rim Using Aluminium Alloy Material 43
wheel casting for the present study (Figs. 1.1(c)& 1.1(d) Shows the 3D model of initial
& modified gating systems).Used in automobile industry made of Aluminium
alloy(Al95.5-Cu4.5). During simulation of the casting process, mold filling and
solidification are examined and gravity casting process is optimized.
2. Methodology
The purpose of this paper is to simulate the solidification of aluminium alloy castings,
and analyze the results obtained for component after solidification, and to optimize the
casting parameters in order to achieve better properties of aluminium castings. The
procedures were mainly divided into three stages. They were Simulation Preparation,
Computer Aided Simulation on ProCAST, and Analysis. Each stage contained several
steps. Researcher followed this operation flow to try and examine different influencing
factors, such as molten metal temperature, mold material, inlet velocity, and substrate
pre-heating temperature. Fig. 2.1 is the procedure graph showing the entire
methodology followed for the present work.
3. Material
Aluminium Alloy (AL95.5-CU4.5) Composition
Aluminium 95.5%
Copper 4.5%
mold filling is based on ProCAST simulation results. The mold filling processes of the
initial and modified gating systems are able to be visualized from Figs. 4(a) & 4(b).
It is found that for every succession of one second fraction of solid and
temperatures are changing (encompasses pouring basin, sprue and runner system,
gatings, casting and feeder) will be filled up.Figures.4(c)& 4(d). It can be seen that
down sprue and feeder were filled up simultaneously since their dimensions and
shapes are very similar. Though the down sprue is the entrance of the molten metal, it
was not filled up or completely wetted during the mold filling of cavity. Generally, the
mold filling is successful as a result of proper design of straight runner system. It can
be seen that the straight runner and gatings were filled up with in the first few second.
80%. The molten metal is poured at 680°C with the temperature and solidification
behavior of the molten metal as shown in the figures 4(a) & 4(b).Once simulation is
complete, a defect free casting is obtained with a yield of 80%. (which is shown in
comparison table.2).On comparison of the entire defect free castings yield, turbulence,
flow, etc are to be taken into consideration such that a sound casting could be provided
to the user.
Fig. 4(a): Mold filling and Temperature Fig. 4(b): Mold filling and Temperature
variations of initial gating system at variations of modified gating system at
various stages resp. various stages resp.
initial gating system. In the modified gating system the temperature variation between
nodes at the start seems to be non-uniform but at the end of solidification it is uniform.
5. Conclusions
The main conclusions that can be drawn from this study are:
1. By replacing the trial and error with simulation software which involves a
virtual process can be able to utilize our resources efficiently.
2. Simulation tool used has a flexibility of visual and analysis of mold filling and
solidification at a time in a high resolution.
3. The simulation tool was used to identify critical locations and filling pattern
and solidification related problem areas in the casting.
4. By moving the trial and error process into the virtual world and can determine
the cost, time, scrap rate, and the quality of different design and process
options.
5. Simulation tool identifies the defects after solidification like shrinkage
porosity, distortion, warm holes etc.
6. These defects can be shown in numerical values or in line diagrams at specified
nodes.
References
[1] Moreira, Jose and Ribeiro, C.A.Silvia (2003),Confrontation of two
solidification simulation software to aparticular use into foundry industry,
Material Science Forum,v455-456, Advanced Materials Forum II:
Proceedings of the IIInternational Materials Symposium,
[2] M.R Bharkudarov, C.W Hirt (2005), Castingsimulation: mold filling and
solidification- Benchmarkcalculations using flow-3d.
[3] Ravi, B (2005), Metal Casting–Computer AidedDesign and Analysi, Prentice
Hall of India Private Limited,New Delhi
[4] Viswanathan, W.D.Porter (2000), FeedabilityAnalysis and Optimization
Driven by Casting Simulation,Indian foundry journal, 53(6), 71-78, 200
[5] Application of Commercial Software Package “ProCAST” to the Prediction of
Shrinkage Porosity inInvestment Castings.
www.mmat.ubc.ca/databases/Details.asp?id=354, accessed during February,
2011.
[6] B.Ravi (2008), Casting Simulation and Optimization:Benefits, Bottlenecks,
and Best Practices, Technical Paper forIndian Foundry Journal, Special Issue.
[7] Campbell, John (2004) , Castings Practice–The 10Rules of Castings
[8] Guharaja, S., NoorulHaq, A. and Karuppannan, K.vM.(2006), Optimization of
Green Sand Casting ProcessParameters by Using Taguchi‟s Method,
International Journalof Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 30, n 11–12,
p.1040–1048.
[9] Hu-Hong jun et al (2006), Application of the softwareProCAST in the casting
of solidification simulation by,MaterialScience and Technology,(14), pp.292-
295