Ajc H2 Chem P3 MS
Ajc H2 Chem P3 MS
Ajc H2 Chem P3 MS
Section A
R1 R1 R1
slow fast
C CH2 R2 C CH2 R2 C CH3
R2
H Cl
H Cl
Cl
(ii) [1]
Alkyl groups exert an electron–donating effect, helping to disperse the positive [1]
charge on the carbocation, stabilising it.
[1]: need to show clearly which carbocation is more stable – in drawing or words
[1]: correct explanation (do not accept H atom attaches itself to the double–
bonded C atom already carrying a larger number of H atoms)
(b) (i) There are only 6 electrons around the central B atom of borane (incomplete [1]
octet) / there is an empty (p) orbital on boron.
(ii) R1 R1 H [2]
C CH2 R2 C C H
R2
H BH3
B
H H
Not required
“favours formation of anti–Markovnikov product.” and the structure of the
intermediate showing presence of –BH3–
B atom is the electrophilic centre.
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 1
(iv) [1]
HO
OH
X = Cl, Br, I, OH
(ii) Step I: suitable halogen X2, in inert solvent / cold KMnO4, dil. H2SO4 [1]
chosen halogen should correspond with proposed structure of H provided in
(c)(i)
Step II: NaOH in ethanol, heat (under reflux) / excess conc. H2SO4, 180 oC [1]
(iii) Heat separate samples of G and isoprene with acidified KMnO4. [1]
For MgO, magnesium oxide dissolves sparingly in water to give a white [1]
suspension of Mg(OH)2. pH = 9.
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 2
2 (a) (i) Brønsted–Lowry acid is a proton (H+) donor. [1]
2
(iv) [H ][SO4 ] [1]
Ka =
[HSO4 ]
Alternative
(10 x)(x)
= 1.0 x 10–2
(10 x)
10x + x2 = 0.1 – 0.01x
x2 + 10.01x – 0.1 = 0
solving by GC, x = 0.00998
[H+]total = 10 + 0.00998
= 10.0 mol dm–3
(vi) [SO42–] = 0.0100 mol dm–3 (accept 0.00998 mol dm–3) [1]
[HSO4–] = 10 – 0.01
= 9.99 mol dm–3
(vii) HSO4– is a very weak base because its tendency to accept a H+ proton is very [1]
low since H2SO4 is completely ionised / a strong acid.
Kw
or Kb (HSO4–) = is very small as H2SO4 is a strong acid and its Ka is
K a (H2 SO 4 )
large.
Hence HSO4– is a stronger acid than it is a base as Ka (HSO4–) = 1.0 x 10–2 >> Kb
[1]
(HSO4–).
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 3
(b) (i) Anode: 2SO42– S2O82– + 2e or 2H2SO4 H2S2O8 + 2H+ + 2e [2]
Cathode: 2H+ + 2e H2
(do not accept 2H2O + 2e H2 + 2OH–)
(iv) O [3]
H O O S O H
O
HOO = 104.5o (accept 104o – 105o)
OOS = 104.5o (accept 104o – 105o)
SOH = 104.5o (accept 104o – 105o)
OSO = 109.5o (accept 109o)
Since Ecell > 0, both reactions are feasible. Hence Mn2+ acts as a homogeneous
catalyst in the two–step reaction by providing an alternative pathway with lower
activation energy via the intermediate Mn3+(aq).
[1]: suitable choice of Eo wrt Mn2+ (accept MnO4–/Mn2+ but not MnO2/Mn2+)
[1]: appropriate attempts to show Eocell > 0 (i.e. ignore numerical error if method and
conclusion is correct)
(award only the 2nd mark if Mn3+ is used as catalyst instead)
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 4
3 (a) (i) high temperature and low pressure [1]
(ii) 68 [2]
n(PH3) = = 2.00 mol
[31.0 3(1.0)]
pV = nRT
nRT
V=
p
2.00(8.31)(800)
=
3.36 107
= 3.96 x 10–4 m3
= 396 cm3
(iii) PH3 behaves non–ideally and volume calculated in (a)(ii) is smaller than the [2]
volume of the container.
1 3
Hfo = (–3012) + (–286) – (–1291)
4 2
= +109 kJ mol1
(iii) Cl is more electronegative than H. Hence the H–Cl bond is polar and the bond [1]
has ionic character which results in extra bond strength.
The electronegativity of P and H are similar, hence the bond energy of the P–H
bond is just the average of the H–H and P–H bond energies.
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 5
oxidation number of
C1: –2
C2: 0
(iv) [2]
H CH3 H CH3
H C C CH3 C C Ph3P O
H CH3
Ph3 P O
CH2OH
K:
O
C H
L:
+ –
M: Ph3P–CHPh
[1] each
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 6
4 (a) (i) H H [2]
H O O H
H C C C C Cl
H H H H
(ii) OH [2]
CH3 C C C2H5
H CH3
The yield of carbocation Q is smaller as it is a less stable carbocation due to 1
less electron donating alkyl group to help disperse the positive charge on the
carbocation.
(iii) OH [1]
CH3 C C H more stable
OH OH intermediate
H CH2Cl
CH3 C C H
OH
H CH2Cl
CH3 C C H less stable
intermediate
H CH2Cl
followed by
H O
CH3 C C H
OH CH2Cl shift
CH2Cl
CH3 C C H
H O
H CH2Cl H shift
CH3 C C CH2Cl
H
R S T
[1] each
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 7
Not required
R and S react with Na2CO3.
presence of –CO2H
likely presence of 1o in T (due to reduction of –CO2H in R)
R, S and T give yellow ppt with I2/OH–.
presence of CH3COR or in R and CH3CH(OH)R in S and T (S and T are
formed from the reduction of R)
From these 2 pieces of information, you can deduce the structure of R as the
remaining 2 C atoms must be branched in order for R to be chiral.
NH NH
V W
[1] each
Not required
V and W react with sodium metal.
likely presence of (2o) alcohol (due to reduction of ketone in U)
Only W reacts with HCl(aq).
presence of basic amine group in W (infer from the molecular formula and
structure of U)
From these 2 pieces of information and from the loss of 1 O atom and gain of 4
H atoms (U W), you can deduce the structure of W. (or by comparing W
with V)
Other cues include “LiAlH4 is the more powerful of the two” and “behaves
differently towards the two reducing agents”.
(iv) Compound U is neutral but ethylamine is basic. Lone pair on the N of U is [2]
delocalised into the C=O, hence it is not available to accept the H+ ion.
In ethylamine, the electron donating ethyl group bonded to N makes the lone pair
more available to accept the H+ ion, hence it is more basic.
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 8
H OH
O O OH
slow fast
CH3CH2 C CH3 CH3CH2 C CH3 + OH
C
CH3CH2 CH3 H H
[1]: correct dipoles on the carbonyl C and O and correct curly arrows
[1]: correct intermediate and product, (slow/fast steps clearly indicated)
(ii) Since the butanone molecule is trigonal planar with respect to the carbonyl [1]
carbon atom, the nucleophile has equal probability of attacking it from either side
of the molecule.
This generates equimolar mixture of the enantiomers / alcohol formed via
nucleophilic addition mechanism and gives an optically inactive racemic mixture
which does not rotate plane–polarised light.
(iii) Absence of electron deficient C atom / polarised bond or same electronegativity [1]
between 2 C atoms and not susceptible to nucleophilic attack by H–.
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 9
5 (a) (i) [I2 ]CCl 4 [1]
D=
[I2 ]water
0 .102
= = 85
0 .00120
OR
[ I 2 ]water 0 .00120
D= = = 0.0118
[ I 2 ]CCl 4 0 .102
(ii) When the [I–] increases, by Le Chatelier’s Principle, the position of equilibrium [1]
shifts to the right, to decrease the concentration of I–, hence favouring the
forward reaction. This results in a decrease in the fraction of I2.
0 .085
[I2]water =
85
= 0.001 mol dm–3
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 10
(iii) When concentrated HCl is added to an aqueous solution of Co2+, ligand [2]
exchange occurs where Cl– displaces H2O ligands, forming the blue [CoCl4]2–.
Addition of water will cause the position of equilibrium to shift to the left,
reforming the pink [Co(H2O)6]2+.
(recall: the effect of decreasing pressure on system will cause P.O.E. to shift to
the side with more gaseous particles so as to increase the pressure)
+
NH3
Cl NH3
CoIII
H3N Cl
NH3
F
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 11
(d) (i) The energy gap E between the two sets of d–orbitals is greater than the [1]
repulsion energy, favouring the pairing of electrons.
[1]: for comparison of energy gap E and repulsion energy between electrons
(ii) Ni2+ ion: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d8 [2]
energy gap E
energy gap E
©2015AndersonJC/CHEM 12