Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Gueorguiev

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/264323622

Quality Management in Higher Education

Article · January 2006

CITATIONS READS

14 9,589

1 author:

Tzvetelin Gueorguiev
University of Ruse Angel Kanchev
15 PUBLICATIONS   39 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Engineering Student Centered Learning Approaches (ESCOLA) View project

Smart/Precision Agriculture Technology, http://benefit.edu.ps/ View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Tzvetelin Gueorguiev on 06 January 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION

TZVETELIN GUEORGUIEV

Abstract: Being an indicator for organisational performance, the quality of education should be the primary
goal of all educational institutions, including universities. By definition quality is the extent to which a product or
service meets a complex of requirements. Thus universities should aspire to satisfy the requirements of their
students, staff, stake-holders, society, and applicable regulatory requirements. The EU is aiming to become the
world leader in terms of the quality of its education and training systems. As a future member country Bulgaria
takes an active part in the Bologna, Lisbon and Copenhagen processes.
Keywords: quality management, higher education, European requirements, ISO 9001:2000

Introduction
Quality management in education is a vital milestone in the development of the modern
and future European society. Regarded as ‘one of the most conservative systems’ education
has reacted relatively slowly to changes ‘in the ouside life’. Nevertheless it has proved to be a
must in the progress of any nation. The cohesion of the requirements of students, society and
university staff is the foundation of a sustainable knowledge spiral to quality education. In
order to examine the problem thoroughly one should study the motivation of the parties
involved in the process.
For better understanding of quality one should be faliliar with its definition. While several
interpretations may be listed here, one particular stands out as the most widely
acknowledged. In the ISO 9000 context, the standardized definition of quality refers to all
those features of a product (or service) which satisfy the customer's requirements and comply
with any regulations applicable to those products or services [5].
The ISO 9000 family of international standards is primarily concerned with "quality
management". This means what the organization does to fulfil:
 the customer's quality requirements, and
 applicable regulatory requirements, while aiming to
 enhance customer satisfaction, and
 achieve continual improvement of its performance in pursuit of these objectives.
From a historical perspective quality has passed through several stages:
 quality control - processes are monitored to ensure that all quality requirements
are being met and performance problems are solved;
 quality assurance covers all activities from design, development, production,
installation, servicing and documentation. It includes the regulation of the quality of raw
materials, assemblies, products and components; services related to production; and
management, production, and inspection processes;
 quality management includes all the activities that managers carry out in an effort
to implement their quality policy. These activities include quality planning, quality control,
quality assurance, and quality improvement;
 total quality management (TQM) is defined as a management approach that aims
to achieve and sustain long-term organizational success by encouraging employee feedback
and participation, satisfying customer needs and expectations, respecting societal values and
beliefs, and obeying governmental statutes and regulations [1].

=1=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

S.K.Saxena gives another interesting interpretation of quality [2]. He envisions quality as


a cross-section of three sub-systems- utility, worth and availability. The Venn diagram (see
Fig.1) demostrates that one of the properties of quality is the intellectual worth of the product
or service. In other words quality is the customer’s personal perception of perfection.

UTILITY
WORTH
features
economic
form
intellectual
fitness

AVAILABILITY
quantity
timeliness

Figure1 Graphical definition of quality

Explanation
The question of the quality of education arises periodically. The causes for this
discussion may vary, but it always attracts public attention. There is no doubt that the
requirements for better education are always a step ahead of the development of the
educational system. The European Association for Quality Assurance (EAQA) [3] is also
struggling to catch up with the developments in the theory of quality and adhere to quality
management. It has defined measurable criateria for the quality of education: policy and
procedures for quality assurance; approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes
and awards; assessment of students; quality assurance of teaching staff; learning resources
and student support; information systems, and public information.
The ISO 9001:2000 standard requires that all activities within an organisation are to be
understood and implemented as a system of interconnected processes.
According to Deming’s Cycle, the management of a process includes four crucial steps:
Plan – Do – Check – Action, known as the PDCA cycle (see Fig.2).
Planning (Set-up) is the first step and depending on the scope and time scale must
include one or more of the following: definition of the quality policy of the university, setting up
long or short term goals and objectives, promotion, cooperation with other universities,
faculties, departments, etc.
Do (Implementation) is the next step when specific activities have to be carried out in
order to achieved the planned goals and objectives through teaching/learning, training,
combination of internal quality systems with external practices, etc. Developing ownership
and personal motivation amongst staff, trainers and trainees, are important preconditions to
achieve coherence between goals, objectives and implementation.
Check (Evaluation and Assesment) - this phase consists of two parts- collection and
processing of data and the discussions on the results which have been achieved. An
important challenge is to avoid ‘the biggest sin’ of documented management systems, i.e. the
collection of useless data. It may take a lot of resources- time, manpower, and storage

=2=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

facilities in order to process the bulk of information that can be gathered in just one month of
internal audits.
Action (Feedback and Procedures for Change) Since quality management a
continuous and systematic process it must undergo constant review combining self-
assessment with evaluation by an external body, processing feed-back and organising
procedures for change.
Depending on the outcome of the third phase (Check) a process can be either ‘good’ or
conforming to the requirements, or non-conforming or defective. A set of actions should be
prescribed both for ‘high’ and ‘low’ quality processes. If there is a significant non-conformance
immediate action must be taken. Preventive actions are suggested when a problem is
reoccurring. Universities can apply benchmarking, good practices and innovative methods in
order to improve their chances for prosperity.

Figure 2 PDCA cycle in higher education

=3=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

In order to achieve continual improvement univestities should recognise their


‘customers’, regard them as the primary reason for their existence and do everything possible
to maintain good relationships with students, staff, companies, and society in general (see
Fig.3).

Students

Universities Government

Quality
of
Education

Companies Society

Figure 3 Parties involved in the quality management of education

Students
The primary customers of schools, colleges and universities are students. The
educational system currently implemented in Bulgaria divides the university students into
three types of degrees- bachelor, master, and doctorate. In order to esimate the students’
perception of the quality of education several surveys have been conducted recently and in
the past. The objectiveness of the surveys is guaranteed by their anonymity. The two central
questions were:
 What is your reason for appying?
 What are your expectations for your future after graduation?
The answers varied significantlly between bachelor, master and doctorate degree
students of the University of Rousse.
The most frequent reason for bachelor students to apply and study in a university is to
continue their high school or college education. Among the rest of the answers are: future
better realisation, accessibility and contacts, as well as some relatively uncommon reasons-
avoiding military service (for male students), possibilities for participation in student exchange
programs (see Table 1) [4] and summer work in EU countries and the USA.

Table 1
Actual number of outgoing/incoming ERASMUS
students for the specified academic year

OUTGOING INCOMING
2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
TOTAL IN 123957 135586 144037 123957 135453 144037
EUROPE
BULGARIA 612 751 779 67 89 179

=4=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

Master degree students expect to gain competitive advantage by furthering their


education, as well to specialise in a field of their interest. Some of them point out their current
job placement as the main reason for their interest in the specific programme.
The doctorate students are mainly pursuing the highest educational degree in order to
be able to apply for scientific work in universities or scientific institutes, or to be hired by the
R&D departments of foreign-owned companies.

Universities
The University of Rousse ‘Angel Kanchev’ is one of the accredited universities in
Bulgaria. As part of the European orientation of the university it has been certified by BVQI for
being in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001:2000. With its 60 years of continued
success the University of Rousse has policies and staff that attest for its good standing.
Nevertheless the staff are looking for ways to improve their performance. In the past
few years several steps have been taken towards better satisfaction of all participants in
definig the quality of education:
 An additional Vice Rector is responsible for the Quality Managent System of the
university;
 Research & Development Sector, participating in national and international scientific
projects;
 Several centers have been established: University Computing and Information
Services Center, Bulgarian-Romanian Interuniversity Europe Center (BRIE), Center for
Continuing Education and Career Development, and Center for International Cooperation and
Mobility.
 ECTS information package for facilitation of the transfer and mobility of students;
 Close relationships with businesses from the Rousse region, as well as nationwide
companies and professional organisations;
 Development of web-based teaching materials;
 Better multimedia presentation of lectures, seminars, etc.;
 Participation of students in scientific forums.

Society
Even though society may seem a remote factor in defining the quality of education it
serves as a wider base for ideas and improvements. In a broader sense society includes just
about everyone- starting from students and administration, continuing with the parents of
students, and last but not least- the university professors and instructors.
With their impressions of their student life, curriculum and job placement possibilities
students affect the choice of many other potential university applicants. Naturally being that
close to the university opens the students’ eyes to a reality that may be different from their
initial expectations. This is where a good quality measurement system would be most
suitable- to estimate the ‘customer satisfaction’, so that any future students would have better
experience and will improve the image of the university.
The parents of the students may influence their choice of profession, specialisation, or
even university. More and more parents of young adults hold bachelor and/or master degrees
and expect their children to follow their example. In other words society may shape the
mindset of prospect and current students. As a result it may eventually affect the inputs for
the process of education.

=5=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006

Companies
Companies make use of the outputs of the process of education. As a consequence of
the growing needs of the market, companies seek better-educated staff at a lower price.
Being pressured by their competitors they hire more competent people who can meet the
requirements for more than a single position.
According to ISO 9001:2000 staff competence depends on four major factors-
education, training, skills and experience. Education is the basis of that scheme. If a person
lacks this first step, it would take a lot of effort, time and money to fill that void. This is the
reason schools, colleges and universities are so important for businesses of any industry.
The current trend in Bulgaria shows increased interest in the cooperation between
businesses and educational institutions. Having gained autonomy universities also have
limited sources of funding. In order to keep up with cutting-edge technologies, devices and
methods, some universities and their departments receive specialized equipment in exchange
for advertising companies’ products.
On the other hand businesses supply scholarships, internships and thesis topics for
gifted students. Such cooperation is of mutual interest and has good perspectives for the
future. In the case of the University of Rousse the role of the mediator in those activities is the
Center for Career Development.

Government and EU
The Bulgarian Parliament has passed several laws that facilitate the improvement of
education including the Law for Encouragement of Scientific Research, the Law for Higher
Education, and the Law for Professional Education and Training. Some new clauses in those
laws require:
 quality assurance of education and scientific research using an internal system for
assessment and assurance of the quality of education and that of the academic staff,
including studies of the opinion of students;
 quality control, assurance and management of education, professional fields and
academic staff;
 partial education of Bulgarian and foreign students in a university, faculty or
specialization of their choice;
 transfer of students from one university, faculty or specialization to another;
 choice of a professor and/or instructor when more than one professor teaches the
same subject;
 implementation of the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) for assessment of
the knowledge and skills of students.
If one takes into consideration the nearing EU membership of Bulgaria, the decisions of
the Government should be interpreted in the context of the EU laws and regulations.
It must be noted that chapters 17-‘Science and Scientific Research’ and 18-‘Education
and Training’ are among the first ones that confirm Bulgaria’s deserved place in the EU.
The exchange of Good Practices (GP) in education between the Bulgarian Government
and other countries is performed by the ‘European Integration and Bilateral Cooperation’
Department of the Ministry of Education [6]. One of the specific tasks of that department is the
coordination of the participation of Bulgaria in the Bologna Process (since 19 June 1999) and
implementation of the Lisbon strategy (2000).
On 14 July 2004, the European Commission adopted a new Integrated Action
Programme (IAP) in the field of lifelong learning. The aim of the new IAP is ‘to contribute
through lifelong learning to the development of the Community as an advanced knowledge
society, with sustainable economic development, more and better jobs and greater social

=6=
QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION 2006
cohesion. It aims to foster interaction, cooperation and mobility between education and
training systems within the Community, so that they become a world quality reference’.

Conclusion
Quality management in education is a rather comlex topic. What makes it such is the
number of the parties involved as well as the intensity of changes in modern life.
What is positive about the Bulgarian educational system is the ISO 9001:2000
certification of some universities, complieance with European standards and guidelines, and
its relative accessibility due to lower tuition costs compared to other European countries.
The fact that there is no Bulgarian university in the top rankings of European higher
schools is a serious signal for corrective actions. In the highly competitive knowledge sphere
only the fittest, best prepared and adaptable universities will survive.
If educators apply TQM principles they would plan more acurately, perform better,
estimate their achievements and take all necessary actions in order to prosper and stay
focused on excellence.

Tzvetelin Gueorguiev, MSc, Eng.


Certified Auditor, ECTS coordinator of the Mechanical Engineering Department
Assistant, University of Rousse ‘Angel Kanchev’, Rousse, Bulgaria
Phone: ++359-82-888493
E-mail: cid@abv.bg

Bibliography:

1. http://praxiom.com/iso-definition.htm
2. http://www.discover6sigma.org/post/2005/10/few-words-on-quality/
3. http://www.enqa.net/files/ENQA Bergen Report.pdf
4. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/socrates/erasmus/erasmus_en.html
5. http://www.iso.org/iso/en/iso9000-14000/understand/basics/general/basics_4.html
6. http://www.minedu.government.bg

=7=

View publication stats

You might also like