Despersion
Despersion
Despersion
Despersion
The phenomena of splitting of light into its constituent colours is called dispersion
of light. When a beam of light is made to fall on one refracting face of prism, it
splits into seven colours namely violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange and
red. (VIBGYOR)
SAMATA +2 by PR
- The pattern of colors components of light is called the spectrum of light and
the medium through which it splits is called dispersive medium.
1. Cause of dispersion of white light:
Light rays of different colors travel with the same speed in vacuum , but
in refracting medium like glass, water etc, lights of different colors travel
with different speeds. The speed of violet color is least while the speed of
μ
red color is the largest in glass. So, the refractive index ( C
¿
of glass is
v
¿
largest for violet and least for red color. Since angle of deviation of light
through prism is δ
¿
A
, so the violet color deviated most while the
( ¿ μ ¿−¿ 1 ¿ )
red color deviated least on passing through the prism. Other, colors are
deviated by intermediate angles.
2. Angular dispersion:
The angular dispersion for two different colors of light is defined as the
difference between angle of deviation for them.
The angular dispersion between red light and violet through a prism is
δ
¿
δ V
−¿ δ R
SAMATA +2 by PR
For a small angled prism, deviation produced by red and violet color of rays
are
δV
¿
A
( ¿ μV ¿−¿ 1 ¿ )
…(i)
And
δ R
¿
A
( ¿ μR ¿−¿ 1¿ )
…(ii)
Where, μV and μR are refractive indices of violet and red light respectively
and A is angle of prism.
From equation (i) and (ii), we get
A
δ V
− ¿ δ R
¿
(¿ μR ¿−¿ 1¿)
A
( μV − 1 )
− ¿
:. δV
−¿ δ R
= A
(¿ μV ¿−¿ μ R ¿ )
3. Dispersive power ( ω ):
It is defined as the ratio of angular dispersion between violet and red
light to the deviation for mean light (yellow). It is denoted by ω .
Dispersive power ( ω )= ( μV −μ R )
( μ−1)
,
and represent the focal length and refractive
μ R
μ
,
f V μV
…(i)
f
¿
(
μ −1 )
( )
1
1
R 1+
R2
…(II)
f R
¿
( μ R− 1 )
( )
1
1
R 1 +
R2
And,
1
…(iii)
f V
¿
( μV − 1 )
( )
1
1
R 1 +
R2
¿
1
1
R2
+
(iv)
1
f ( μ− 1 )
Using equation (iv) and putting in (ii) and (iii) and on subtracting them, we
get
1
f V
1
− ¿
f R
¿
( μV −1 )
f ( μ −1 )
( μ R −1 )
−¿
f ( μ −1 )
f
−f V R
Or, ¿
f Rf V
μ V −1− μ R + 1
f ( μ−1 )
f R −f V
Or, f V f R
¿
μV − μR
f ( μ −1 )
f R
Or, −f V
¿
( μ ¿ ¿ V − μ R ) f ( μ −1 ) ¿
…(v)
¿ f V
f R
Or, f
f
¿
2
V
…(vi)
f R
SAMATA +2 by PR
From (V) and (vi), we get
f R
−f V
¿
( μ ¿ ¿ V − μ R ) f ( μ −1 ) ¿
2
f
f R
Or, −f V
¿
( μ ¿ ¿ V − μ R ) ( μ −1 ) ¿
f
:. f
−f
ω
¿
R
ω
Where, ¿
( μ¿¿ V −μ R ) ( μ−1 ) ¿
¿
a
n
d
'
ω
a
n
d
μ R
respectively and f V
, f a n d fSAMATA
are the focal length of respective colors of
R +2 by PR
lens L. similarly, and are corresponding parameters
'
μV '
f V
, ,
μ '
, f
,
'
μ R
'
f R
For lens L;
Focal length of mean color is
1
…(i)
f
¿
(
μ −1 )
( )
1
1
R 1+
R2
Again,
Focal length of red color of light,
1
…(ii)
f R
¿
( μ R−1 )
( )
1
1
R 1 +
R2
For F R be the combined focal length of two lenses for red color, then
1
F R
¿
1
f R
1
+¿
f ' R
Or,
F R
f
¿
R− 1( μ
( μ −1 )
) …(vi)
( μR ' − 1 )
+¿
f ' ( μ ' −1 )
Similarly, for violet color of light , the combined focal length of two
lenses is
1
F V
¿
( μV − 1 )
f ( μ −1 )
…(vii)
( μ V ' −1 )
+¿
f ' ( μ ' −1 )
Or 1 = 1 (viii)
FR FV
( μ R−1 )
f ( μ −1 ) = ( μV −1 )
( μR ' −1 ) f ( μ −1 )
+¿ ( μ V ' −1 )
f ' ( μ ' −1 ) +¿
f ' ( μ ' −1 )
( μ R −1 )
f (
μ −1 )
Or, (
μ V −1 )
−¿
( μ −1 )
f
¿
( μV ' −1 )
' ( μ
'
−1 )
f
( μ R ' −1 )
−¿
f ' ( μ ' −1 )
μ R − 1− μV + 1
Or, =
f ( μ− 1 )
' '
μ V − 1− μ R +1
' ( μ '− 1 )
f
Or
f
¿
ω'
'
f
ω'
¿
f
f '
SAMATA +2 by PR
It is the defect of lens due to which, all the parallel rays passing through
the convex lens are not focused at a single point on the principal axis and hence,
the image of a point object formed by the lens is blurred.
.
For the removal of spherical aberration in a lens, it is essential that the focal
length of a lens for each zone must be equal so that, rays incident on the lens
after refraction meet at the same point, Which is not possible in practice. So, in
practice the marginal rays meet nearer and paraxial rays father from the lens.
That’s why the spherical aberration in a lens cannot removed completely but can
reduced .
SAMATA +2 by PR