Test 1 2021 Sem2

CONFIDENTIAL
TEST 1 SET 1 (Q1 & Q2), SEMESTER II

SESSION 2020/2021
COURSE CODE : MKEP 1563
COURSE : POWER QUALITY
LECTURER : ASSOC. PROF TS DR. DALILA BINTI MAT

SAID
PROGRAMME : MKEP
SECTION : 01
TIME : 40 MINUTES
DATE : 5 MAY 2021
INSTRUCTION TO CANDIDATE :
1. ALL WORKING STEPS NEED TO BE SHOWN CLEARLY.

2. DRAW NEAT DIAGRAMS WHENEVER NECESSARY.
2
MKEP1563 – TEST 1
Q.1 The Smart Devices industry has complaints on voltage sag experienced by their factory, this
issue has been caused some of their machines to malfunction. The factory is supplied from a
substation PMU-156. Referring to the utility company, the Power Quality Monitoring device
has been installed at PMU-156 for two months. Figure Q1 shows the plot of events during
the two months (60 days) of the monitoring period. The Ride-Through Test (RTT) was
performed on the critical factory equipment and the result of immunity level for Equipment
Under Test 1, EUT1, and Equipment Under Test 2, EUT2 are also shown in Figure Q1.
100
90
Voltage Sag Magnitude ( % of Nominal)
E
80
J
70
C I
60
F H
A
50
D
40
B
30
G
20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1
Duration of Voltage Sag in seconds
MS IEC 61000-4-34 EUT1 EUT 2
Figure Q1.
(a) Define the immunity level for EUT1 and EUT2 and describe the effect of voltage sags to
the factory.
(4 marks)
3
MKEP1563 – TEST 1
(b) Identify the events name (A-J) that:

(i) violating MS-IEC-61000-4-34
(ii) violating MS-IEC-61000-4-34, however, not impact the EUT2 to function
(iii) violating MS-IEC-61000-4-34, however, not impact both EUT1 and EUT 2 to
function
(iv) comply with MS-IEC-61000-4-34, but may cause EUT1 to malfunction
(v) comply with MS-IEC-61000-4-34, but may cause both EUT1 and EUT 2 to
malfunction
(7 marks)
(c) Determine SARFI90, SARFI80, SARFI60 and SARFI40 to a standardized one-month period
(30 days).
(4 marks)
(d) Suggest the suitable solution to improve the immunity level for both EUT.
(1 mark)
Q2 Figure Q2 represents a 11/0.415 kV mesh system. The impedance values indicated in the figure
are in per unit at a 100MVA base.
j0.05 j0.075
1 3
j0.75
j0.30 j0.45
Figure Q2
(a) Determine the node impedance matrix

(5 marks)
(b) Identify the faulted node (except node 2) that may cause the deepest voltage sag at node
2. Proof your answer.
(3 marks)
CONFIDENTIAL
TEST 1 SET 2 (Q3 & Q4), SEMESTER II

SESSION 2020/2021
COURSE CODE : MKEP 1563
COURSE : POWER QUALITY
LECTURER : ASSOC. PROF TS DR. DALILA BINTI MAT

SAID
PROGRAMME : MKEP
SECTION : 01
TIME : 35 MINUTES
DATE : 5 MAY 2021
INSTRUCTION TO CANDIDATE :
1. ALL WORKING STEPS NEED TO BE SHOWN CLEARLY.

2. DRAW NEAT DIAGRAMS WHENEVER NECESSARY.
2
MKEP1563 – TEST 1
Q.3 Figure Q.3 shows the different underlying causes lead to events in different parts of the
magnitude-duration plot.
Figure Q.3
(a) At which number of areas, fault has a much smaller field of influence and the severity
of the disturbance will be moderated considerably by neighboring circuits.
(1 mark)
(b) At which number of areas of fault is likely to result in a voltage sag that is observed over
a very wide area, even at a distance of some hundred kilometers.
(1 mark)
(c) Explain the important to have this magnitude duration plot
(2 marks)
3
MKEP1563 – TEST 1
Q.4 A radial power system supplying an industrial customer with several large ac and dc adjustable-
speed drives is shown in Figure Q4. The dc and ac drives are fed via dedicated transformers at
420 V and 660V, respectively. System information including source impedance, and feeder
impedance are provided in Table Q4a and Table Q4b. For this case the load current before and
during the fault is neglected. Assume that the pre-event voltage is exactly 1 pu;
400 kV
132 kV
2 feeders
33 kV
4 feeders
11 kV
3 feeders
ac dc
Figure Q4
4
MKEP1563 – TEST 1
Table Q4a: Source impedance for the supply shown in Figure Q4 at 100 MVA base.
Positive and negative

sequence
11 kV 66.08 85.71 %
33 kV 18.34 86.15 %
132 kV 2.86 88.20 %
Table Q4b: Feeder impedance data for the supply shown in Figure Q4 at 100 MVA base.
Positive and negative Max Length
sequence
11 kV 27.75 69.54 %/km 8 km
33 kV 3.42 65.17 %/km 10 km
132 kV 0.28 68.54 %/km 6 km
(a) Calculate the voltage sag magnitude on the 11 kV and 33 kV feeders if the distance between
the fault and feeders is
(i) 2 km
(ii) 5 km
(5 marks)
(b) Determine the magnitude of the shallowest sag due to a fault at
(i) 11 kV
(ii) 132 kV
(4 marks)
(c) Elaborate your answer from Q4(a) by showing/sketch the relationship between sag
magnitude and the distance for faults at various voltage levels.
(3 marks)

Test 1 2021 Sem2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test 1 2021 Sem2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Test 1 2021 Sem2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONFIDENTIAL

TEST 1 SET 1 (Q1 & Q2), SEMESTER II

COURSE CODE : MKEP 1563

COURSE : POWER QUALITY

LECTURER : ASSOC. PROF TS DR. DALILA BINTI MAT

DATE : 5 MAY 2021

1. ALL WORKING STEPS NEED TO BE SHOWN CLEARLY.

(b) Identify the events name (A-J) that:

(a) Determine the node impedance matrix

TEST 1 SET 2 (Q3 & Q4), SEMESTER II

COURSE CODE : MKEP 1563

COURSE : POWER QUALITY

LECTURER : ASSOC. PROF TS DR. DALILA BINTI MAT

DATE : 5 MAY 2021

1. ALL WORKING STEPS NEED TO BE SHOWN CLEARLY.

Positive and negative

You might also like