A 6023 Add-1-EN
A 6023 Add-1-EN
A 6023 Add-1-EN
N'rED D1str.
G3NffiA],
GENERAL t /6oz1laaa.t
4 Novenber 1965
A SSEM B LY
ORIGINAL: H{GIISE
Tlrentleth session
Aacn..lp i*cm 67
tf
65-2749\
t /6o21/aaa.t
Engl-lsb
Page 2
FART T[,iO
TABIE OF CONIE}IIS
Pera€{raphs
._ t
A/6?,21 lAdd.L
English
Page J i
1. Durlng the dlscusslon under ltem J of the agend.a, 'rReview of the lnplenentatlon
of the recomnendatlons Of the Conferencett, nany delegations expressed- Oplnlons on
hov they lnterpreted thls part of the progranme of work of the 3oard, sevexs.l
del_egatlons l-nforned the Board of steps taken by thelr respectlve cou]ltrles to
inplement the recomend.atlons of the gonference as veLL as of recent develoBnents
1n the flelds of trade and developnent.='
2. Delegations fr'cm developlng countrlee consldered that the declslons reached. by
tLre flrst sesslon-of tbe Conference narked a posltlve 6tep tollard-s the solutlon of
the bs.slc ecoDor0lc probleEs of the contemlorary vorS-d. and, 1n par-blcu]-ar, the urgent
problems of the deveLoplng couatries. The socLal-lst countries of Eastern Europe
s.lso shared thls Ylew. So far, however, Ilttle hed been done to inplenent these
d.eclsl-ons. The progress 1n the i4:lemeDtatlon of the Tecoomendatlons of UNoTAD
had. been sloi{r v-ith the that no improvement had occur"ed in the econornlc
"esult
plight of the developi.ng countrles. On the contrary, the terns of trade vere
noving a,gain6t the developing cou::tries again after the sb.olt-llved improvement of
the l-ast tvo years. The exterua]. losltion of these countrles renalned as precs.rious
as ever. Regrets vere expregsed tba'b 6one cou::tries had 1n the past year even
resorted to further restricti-ve measures ln thelr forelgn tTad-e vhl ch had
ad"versely affected the exports of developlng cou:rtries.
3. lelegatlons from d.eveJ-oped aarket economy count"les referred to the rsork 1n
progress in other lnternatLonal instltutlons and actlon taken by lndlvldual
Governments to assist the trad.e and- d-evelopnent of d.eveLoplng countri.es. They
referred. 1n paltlcul€,r to the prospectg of beneflts ln the trade field for
developlng countrles whlch the contlnuing negotiatl-ons l.n the Ke ledy Roud
presented., to the p"og"ess otherwise nede in GATT as e coasequence of the
lntrod_uctlon of new provj-sions lnto the General- AgreeBent concerned v:ith the
interests of d.eveloping countrles, to the discuselons and negotlations, taklng place
or pJ:.med ln relEtion to partl cuJ-ar lmporbant connodltleE and, final-Iy, to the
L/ For d.etails, see the gurnnary record-s of the Bcardt s proceedlngs (m/y/sp"zl-lt+,
2v)-
t
l
p,/6oT/ma.t
ErgLlsh
Page 5
contlnulng effort belng nade to lncrease the volume of fl]]anclal a,nd technJcal ald
o? to lniprove the fo1as in whl ch such aLd vae glven.
4' ft -.I"s, however, pornted. out by sone developlng countries that conslderatlon
of the problens faclng d.eve]-oplng count"tes cou.l-d. at best be onJy a by-protluct of
the €fforts belng nade by the readlng tradlng rations in the Kennedy Bound. Many
I aspect. lnvolved. Ln the trad.e of the developlng countrles elght not recelve
) adequate attentlon 1n these negotl-atLons. rt night therefore be approprr.ate to
consid.er lrhether other negottatlons shouJ.d be arranged..
i 5. The d.elegations f?om the soclalist countrLes of Eastern Eurole lnforued the
Board. of the erpanslon of the fo"elg. trad.e of th.ose countrigs 1n general and. of
thelr trcde v-ith the d.evel-oplng countrleg 1n partl cul-sr. they al_so stated. that
in thelr trad.e rels,tlons thelr countrles adhere stri ctly to the 'prLnciples
governing lntematlolaL trad.e relatl ons and trad.e poljlcles cond,uclve to d-evelopmentrt
adopted by the Conference.
6' rt
w,s agreed. that ltem J of the agenda vao of cruclal lmportance for the
future work of the ITNCTAD nachinery. A roay would have to be found al-ong whl ch the
deveLoped a'd the developlng countrles could co-operate in naklng uNCTAD and dts
bod.les an effectlve instrunent for lnpro'd.ng nnorld trade and, ln
'ubsldlary
partlcuJ,a,r, for promoting trade and. deveJ.opnent of developiDg countrles, rn thet
coDnexion, soue d.elegatLons stressed. that the results of the Boardrs efforts vould.
Jergely d.epend on the outcome of the detalled and speclflc work of its subsldialy
bod.les. There vas al-so general agreement that eone satlsfactoly procedure should
be d.evised for obtalning the naterlal on r,rhl ch a re.rdew and assessroent of the
fuiprenentatl on of the recomend.atlons of the conference nLgtrt be besed.. Eoweve",
views differed. on the content and. character of such a revlev. The d.iscusslon
enabled clari fL catl oo of the dlfferent polnts of rd.ew, and the d.eslrablllty of
reaching agreenent on proced.ures to be used. to revrew progress nade vas recognlzed
by the 3oard .
7. Delega,tlons fron d.evel-eping countrLes nainteined that the Board at r-ts flrst
sesslon decld.ed to rerd.e!, at tts second and thi"d. gesslons the inpl_ementatl orl of
tb.e recoum.end.atlons of the Conference and that it even identlfied. the
con0aendations to whlch parbicuLar attentlon shouLd bepaLd. Eovever, because the
"e
lEforuatlon supplied d.uring the second. sesslon !ra6 not sufficiently d.etaLled, they
A/6@j/Add.L
Ergj-i sh
fage D
considered_ irhat it woulil be dlffi cult for the Boal.d. to form any l.lorthvhile
Judgeneni: on the vork so far done or to deternine the directj-on of 1ts efforts 1n
the Dear futuae.
8. During the d-ebate under iten J of the agenda whl ch 1ed to the adoptton of the
resolution lndlcated ln paragvaph 14 bel-ow, the vlew of d"elegations from developed
countries v-ith narket econonles l,tas that it woul-d be entlrely aplroprlate for a
general debate to be held oo the progxess rnade ln achierdng the obiectives of
UNCTAD in the trade and developmeDt fleld, but not a case-by-case exaulnatlon
They stated that they intend.ed. to participate conscientiousry in the work of the
Board. and its subsidiary bodies with the al-m of seeking general- agleement and
fi.tlding a basis for further p"og?ess. However, the whole question of the
inplenentatioD of UNCTAD reccDnendations called for clarification. fn the view of
these delegatlons, UNCTAD r,raE concerned with 'ohe fornul-ation of objectives and with
proBosals for attaiJ]ing these objectives. rt was pointed out that there were
I various ways in which the UNCTAD objeetives couLd. be pwsued.. These included the
actions rqhich Governments cen and. do take autonom.ously within the field of interest
of ITNCTAD" rt was also possible in certain areas for uNcrAD to initiate processes
which eould resurt in international agreement on specific natters as envisaaed in
cene:tal Assembly resol-ution Lggj (J(IX).
L2. The delegations f:ron the socialist coultrles of Eastern Eu!:ope considered it
desirable, a year after the first conference, to revieir the progress mad.e and to
consid.er what new neasures were requi-red. to ensure that alr countries enjoyed the
benefits of international trade, rn their vien, uNcrAD trust gua"d againsr
degenerating into a sterile debating society. The same delegations considered that
the nain task of the institulrlonal m.achinery establ_ished was to find the nost
suitabre soLutions for trade and d.evelopnent problems, particurarly those of the
devetoping countries. The reconmendations ad.opted by the first session of the
Conference were an lntegral part of the over-aLl efforts to normalize inte"national
trade. In that co!:.nexion, the same delegations pointed out that, ir the last
analysis, the implementation of reconmendat ions ad,dressed to the sociallst cormtries
of Eastern Europe depehd.ed. on an i-ncrease in their exports to both the deveLoping
countries and to the developed. market economy countries.
L1' The 3oa"d atte!.pted to reconcire these differing wiews. rhere was generaf
agreement that whlIe the recommend.ations of the conference did not carry the foace
and coEpul-slon of law, they were nevertheless meant to lead to action beneficial
to world trade and, l.n particular, to the trade and. devel_opnent of devel-oplng
countries. It was recognlzed that it rras the duty of the Soard to review and assess
periodically the progress of impl-enentation of the recomnendations and. i.t was
agreed that mer0bers of the Cobference nould. be requested to make available, to this
end, to the secretary-Generar- all relevant informatlon in a foru, they win find
aBpropriate for the purpose. In this coruiexion, it was enphasized that the
^/6cq/Add.L
English
fage o
with such liffiTion and. analysis as the Board nay deer4 necessary for then to
assist it in lts task of revlewj,ng and assessing LnpJ-ementation of the
reconmendations of the Conference in accordance with thelr terms of reference;
o
Vf to" fuLL te"t, see annex A.t to the present report (resolution r9 (rr)).
A/6a1lAdd..L
Fnglish
Page P
Lr. In adoptlng this resolutLon the Board decided to reconnend. to the coanj.ttees
o[ connoditieE and on Manufactu"es to deal, iI 'ohe light of this resolutionr'with
those paragraphs of thelr respective work programme s whlch I'Iere left in squale
I' bracket6..'
I
f6. It was pointed out by some delegatlons tha'c the resolution was anrbl.guous i-n a
nusber of respects, part!.cu1-ar1y ltlth regard to the lnpLementation of
reconnend.ations. In particul-ar, 'bhe resolution dld not specify the use that the
3oard. wou1d. nake of the Secretary-General! s report, nor did lt provide for the
organLzation of concerted actl.on by all- nex0bers, whl-ch was the only roethod by
which lli\cTAD coul-d. achieve effective results. It nas al-so recogni.zed by many
del-egqtions that the procedufes envisaged in paragraph 6 of the resolutipn
mentloned Ln paragraph abwe l^rould unde"go further clarification at the
fosthcoming meetings of the Board and the connittees r,tith a view to enabllng the
Cotrnittees to play tbeir due role effectively aEd expedltiously.
1?. Tlhe delegatLons of Belgiun, SriltzerLand, MexLco, India, Canada, Chile and the
Nethe"Lands nade statenents on thei" position vith respect to the above resol-ution.
These are to be found in thb suDnary record.s of the 3oardts second. sesSion (see
m/B/sR.50).
18. During the dlscussLon under ltem B of the agende,, "Steps to be taken to
achleve agreexaent on prlnclples govemlng lnteraptional.. trade relatipng and trade
po11cle6 conduclve to developnent (see annexes A.I.1, A.I.2; and A.T.J of the
rdnal Act oi UNCTAD, 196l+)1" the secretary-GeneraL of the conference subnltted to
the Board a note (mfnfZO) glving, on the basls of the proceedlngs of the first
session of the Conference, a brlef account of tire leglslatlve h1story of the
General- and speclal PrlncipJ.es, and of the "ogtstanding Dlfferences on General and
Spgcial Priaclples adopted by the Conference|.
L9. fn the course of the dlscusslon under thls ltem, nost delegatlons stressea the
l\rndanental- lmporLance of the Generat and special prlnclpleB adopted by the first
sesslon of the conference, as veLL a6 the necessLty for achl-eving the broadest
possible measu?e of agreement at. the earlLest possible moment on princlples
governlng lnternatlonal trade and trade polisies conduclve to development. rn the
course of the dLscusslon under this ltem as rreLl as under item 1, 'rAdoptlon of the
agenda", a number of del-egatlons emphasized that the task before the Boa"d vas to
Eeeli the broadest posslble meaflire of agreement on the lnplenentatlon of the set
of Prlnclples al-ready adopted by the firEt sessLon of the conference and that they
could not accept a Bitr,ratlon tn vhich these princlples voul-d becone the zubject of
a nev dLsc.lrsslon leadLng to thelr revlEion or to theLr replacement by a nev set of
prlnciples. A nurrber of other delegatLons consLdered that the task lihlch now
faced the Board was to proceed ln accord.ance wLth recomrendatlon A.r.J so as to
achieve the broadest possible neasure of agreement et the earllest posslble moment
on a set of prlnclpl-es. Some delegatlons suggeoted that an advlsory body of
experts night be estalrllshed to ldentify the area of dlsagreement on the Prlnelples
and suggest possible vays of reaching unanlnlLty thereon, other del-egations said
that) in thetr opinion, arr ef-=orts should be nobllized to enflrre the speedlest
fuoplernentatlon of the Prlnclples adopted by the Geneva conference. uley consid.ered
tlrat the report presented by the secretariat (m /B/zo) woul-d not be-e sufficlent
I
basis for funplenentlng conference reconnend.ations A.r"J. Tn the oplnlon of those (
delegations, the Secretary-General shou;Ld, on the basis of the replies from
countries, prepare a report on the positlons of the member states on each of the -
A/ovz)/1].c1a, L
English
Page ll '
Prlnclples ageinst vhi ch they had voted or on vb-l ch they had abetaLned or reserved
*Lo{r naci*.i^ha
-onference. fhose delegatlons thereiore consldered that it
a+ +La a
2t. Ihe Board declded to revert to thls item at its thlrd session. It also
decldefl to refer to tha! sesslon the draft resolutions contalned Ln d.ocuments
D/B/L.\B anA rc/B/L.5I,,. It va6 understaod that tn the meantlme the Secretary-
General rrrould. talce sueh actton a€ he loay deem usefu.l for the further conslderatlon
of. thls iten by the 3oard.
2I'.. fhese d.raft resolutlons read. as follorrrs :
SIEPS TO BE TAKqV TO ACHIXYE AGRE,B4EI\T ON TBINCI?],ES GOYMNI}TG
INtrMI{ATTONA! MADE REI,AIIONS AND TBADE POI,IC]3S CONDUCIVE TO
DEITEIOPIENT (Sp,E ANNEITES A.I.1, A.I.? and. A.I.' OF Tm FINAT
ACI 0F IINCTAD, L96]+)
I
Poland and the Unton of Sovlet SociaList
fI
1on, Chil-e , Ecuador , El- Sahador Ghena, Indla,
"Becalllng annexes A.I.L, A.I.2 and A.I.J of the Ei-na1 Act ol UNCTAD,
r!7e-i
nA)'
t
(
1
I
,l/'^^- l" -.
Alovt2/ Arro,. -L
English
.Hage I+
having dlfferent economlc and social syetens, lrhlch had been subrritted by
,]
'rlrr r1.'hr ^1'r:Fnar"eI Aaqembly resolutlon 1t95 (llTX), the delegatlons fron the
I