Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
Learner Guide
Primary Agriculture
System for
food safety
and quality
man ag emen t
My name: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commodity: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The availability of this product is due to the financial support of the National
Department of Agriculture and the AgriSETA. Terms and conditions apply.
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
2
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
Before we start…
Dear Learner - This Learner Guide contains all the information to acquire all the
knowledge and skills leading to the unit standard:
The full unit standard will be handed to you by your facilitator. Please read the unit
standard at your own time. Whilst reading the unit standard, make a note of your
questions and aspects that you do not understand, and discuss it with your
facilitator.
This unit standard is one of the building blocks in the qualifications listed below.
Please mark the qualification you are currently doing:
This Learner Guide contains all the information, and more, as well as the activities
that you will be expected to do during the course of your study. Please keep the
activities that you have completed and include it in your Portfolio of Evidence.
Your PoE will be required during your final assessment.
Assessment takes place at different intervals of the learning process and includes
various activities. Some activities will be done before the commencement of the
program whilst others will be done during programme delivery and other after
completion of the program.
The assessment experience should be user friendly, transparent and fair. Should
you feel that you have been treated unfairly, you have the right to appeal. Please
ask your facilitator about the appeals process and make your own notes.
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
3
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
Your activities must be handed in from time to time on request of the facilitator for
the following purposes:
The activities that follow are designed to help you gain the skills, knowledge
and attitudes that you need in order to become competent in this learning
module.
It is important that you complete all the activities, as directed in the learner
guide and at the time indicated by the facilitator.
When you have completed all the activities hand this in to the assessor who
will mark it and guide you in areas where additional learning might be
required.
You should not move on to the next step in the assessment process until this
step is completed, marked and you have received feedback from the assessor.
Please note that all completed activities, tasks and other items on which you
were assessed must be kept in good order as it becomes part of your
Portfolio of Evidence for final assessment.
What does it mean? Each learning field is characterized by unique terms and
definitions – it is important to know and use these terms and definitions correctly. These
terms and definitions are highlighted throughout the guide in this manner.
You will be requested to complete activities, which could be group activities, or individual
activities. Please remember to complete the activities, as the facilitator will assess it and
these will become part of your portfolio of evidence. Activities, whether group or individual
activities, will be described in this box.
My Notes …
You can use this box to jot down questions you might have, words that you do not understand,
instructions given by the facilitator or explanations given by the facilitator or any other remarks that
will help you to understand the work better.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
Revision …………………………………………………………………………...……………. 8
Session 1 Manage a traceability system ........................................…………... 11
Bibliography ....................................................................……........ 77
Acknowledgements .....................................................……............ 79
Learning Outcomes
At the end of this learning module, you must is able to demonstrate a
basic knowledge and understanding of:
My Notes …
. ..................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
....................................................................................
Revision of Level 3
Health, Social and Environmental Issues Related to the Agricultural
Environment
Food safety is an essential public health function according to a resolution that
was adopted by the World Health Organisation.
Food-borne diseases are a major threat to public health and affect the social
and economical well-being of societies.
Global trends in food consumption mean that food is consumed far from where
it is produced, and that food from a single source is consumed by a great
number of people.
The Codex Alimentarius Commission establishes international food standards to
protect the health of consumers, and to ensure fair practices in the food trade,
on which member countries base their food safety legislation and regulations.
In South Africa, the Agricultural Products Act (APS) prescribes food safety
standards.
Regulations for specific commodities are based on and empowered by the APS,
and standards and requirement checklists are in turn based on the regulations.
The PPECB is an assignee of the DoA, and conducts, amongst others, quality
assurance inspections in terms of food safety regulations, and food safety
audits.
EurepGAP prescribes a set of food safety and quality standards for all products
that are exported to the European Union and the United Kingdom.
Communicable diseases are of importance in plant production because is
impacts on worker health and productivity.
Workers that contract diseases that are infectious must be removed from the
workplace until they no longer pose a danger to the health of other workers.
The environmental impact and sustainability of food production is usually
addressed on an industry level through Improvement Programmes, Crop and
Fruit Quality Management Research, Disease Management Research, and
Integrated Pest Management Research.
The most significant contribution that individual growers can make to
sustainability and minimising environmental impact is by applying Integrated
Crop Production (ICP) principles.
Awareness amongst workers with regard to food safety issues are created
through skills development, workshops and road shows by commodity
organisations, awareness campaigns, incentives and disciplinary enforcement by
employers, warning signs, and inspections.
Checklists are handy as a guideline for the information that should be
disseminated to workers.
Recordkeeping enables traceability, which should allow one to trace a fruit from
where the consumer buys it back to the tree it grew on in the orchard, with
details of all the processes that it was subjected to in between.
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
9
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
EurepGAP aims to develop widely accepted standards and procedures for the
global certification of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP).
HACCP is a commonsense approach designed to identify and control food safety
hazards, and monitor the controls established.
Internal Audits
Internal audits aim to monitor and probe the integrity of any quality management
system continuously.
There are no specific rules for internal audits, but it is closely related to the type
of quality management system that is in place.
Regardless of the size of the entity or the approach to internal audits, there are
key elements that must be included in all internal audit systems.
Conducting an internal audit mostly includes measuring and monitoring,
evaluation, and reporting.
Implementing Food Safety and Quality Principles
Observing sanitation standard operating procedures eliminate the risk of food
contamination.
Maximum residue levels are prescribed by legislation, but also by importing
country’s standards.
A document indicating maximum residue levels and pre-harvest intervals is
developed by the Citrus Growers Association.
HACCP provides a handy tool for implementing food safety principles.
Hazard analysis involves identifying all possible hazards to food safety at every
point.
Critical control points are identified as points at which control can be applied.
Critical operational limits are established for each critical control point.
Critical control points are monitored and operations are measured against
operational limits.
Procedures for corrective action are developed in case of a loss of control.
Records are kept of all operations at critical control points.
The soundness, effectiveness, and implementation of the system are verified.
Recordkeeping is essential for traceability and effective management.
The types of records that must be kept are prescribed by legislation and
standards authorities.
Record Keeping
1.1 Introduction
Traceability is the ability to trace and follow a food product or any substance
intended to be, or expected to be incorporated into, a food product through all
stages of production, packing, processing, handling and distribution. Traceability
refers to the completeness of the information about every step in a process chain.
It is critical that all employees in the supply chain understands the importance of
food safety and the related traceability of it. Traceability serves the following
purposes:
An agricultural supply chain is a series of distinct activities that take place in order
to take the product from field or orchard to market. The demand chain is the
supply chain in reverse, seen from the consumer’s point of view. The following
diagram show a supply chain where exporting is part of it:
Pack house
Export Agent
Traceability
Transport and Shipment
Service Providers
Importer
Retailer
Consumer
Tracking: Tracking is the ability to follow a path of a specified unit and / or batch
of product through the supply chain as it moves between organisations
towards the final point-of-process, point-of-sale or point-of-service.
Tracking is also referred to as forward traceability.
Tracing: Tracing is the ability to identify the origin, movements and relevant
associated information of a particular unit and / or batch of product
located within the supply chain by reference to records held upstream.
Tracking is also referred to as backward traceability.
In order to meet consumer demands for consistent supply of top quality, safe and
nutritious foods, the design and implementation of full backward and forward
traceable supply chains from farm to end-user has become an important part of the
overall food quality assurance system.
In line with the supply chain, traceability represents the ability to identify the farm
where it was grown and sources of input materials, and the ability to conduct full
backward and forward tracking to determine the specific location and life history in
the supply chain by means of records.
On previous levels we examined traceability in its obvious and simplistic form, but it
is important to remember that traceability have many different elements. Some of
these elements are directly related to the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) that is
discussed in detail in Chapter 2 of this guide.
Product Traceability
Product traceability determines the physical location of a product at any stage
in the supply chain to facilitate logistics and inventory management, product
recall and dissemination of information to consumers and other stakeholders.
Process traceability
Process traceability ascertains the type and sequence of activities that affect
the product during the growing and post-harvest operations, meaning what
happened to it, where and when. These include interactions between the
product and physical, mechanical, chemical, environmental and atmospheric
factors and the absence or presence of contaminants.
Genetic Traceability
Input Traceability
Input traceability determines the type and supplier of inputs such as fertiliser,
chemical sprays, irrigation water, and the presence of additives and chemicals
used for the preservation of the product.
Disease and pest traceability traces the epidemiology of pests and biotic
hazards such as bacteria, viruses and other pathogens that may contaminate
food.
Measurement Traceability
We also already know that traceability and supporting records for fresh produce are
essential components of all quality management systems (QMS).
Checklists and compliance criteria have been developed to be used as an aid and
self-assessment tool for food business operators (FBO's) in implementing the food
safety system. The same checklists are used by PPECB auditors to verify that the
system is in place.
In the table below, the checklists and compliance criteria that have to be completed
by law in order to ensure effective traceability are set out.
Note that checklist and compliance criteria for SA GAP and on-farm pack houses
have now been consolidated, therefore making it equally applicable to primary
growers and secondary processors and packaging establishments.
• What is traceability?
• What is the purpose of traceability for the industry that you are involved in?
• How do producers execute traceability?
• How can the operational efficiency of traceability be ensured and supported?
• How does recordkeeping support the efficiency of traceability?
• Which records are kept to ensure traceability?
• How can a fruit producer show evidence of compliance with traceability systems?
Records can be kept manually, by filling the check lists and forms in by hand, or
electronically, by recording the information on a computer. Electronic systems
have the benefit of also processing the data and additional information can as a
result be extracted from these programs.
Computer programs can, for example, deliver graphs and comparisons about the
progress of the producer in terms of the quality of his produce. Electronic data can
often be used when comparisons are drawn over a period of time. Although
manual data can supply the same information, it is a lot more complicated to
extract the required information without the assistance of electronic equipment and
software.
The records that must be kept in accordance with the requirements of legislations
and various food safety accreditation systems serve as evidence of compliance with
traceability recommendations because specific information with dates and
signatures of responsible parties are found on these documents if they have been
filled in correctly.
All workers that are responsible for traceability records must therefore be trained
in:
• How to complete the forms and checklists correctly.
• How, where, when and for how long, to report on and file forms and
checklists.
• The accountability and responsibility in terms of traceability and the law
related to the completion of (or failure to complete) these forms and
checklists.
Records must be kept for a specified period in a central, accessible place, under the
care of a person appointed for this task. The records must meet standard criteria
of tracking and tracing, in order words it should be kept in a systematic and
chronological way, by date, batch number, geographical reference point, and
delivery or dispatch reference.
HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point system) principles are often used as
the basis for designing and implementing a quality management system. Even is
the HACCP system itself is not used as such, the same basic principles should be
applied. At previous levels we discussed the principles of HACCP in detail. As a
reminder, they are:
• Hazard analysis
• Identification of critical control points
• Establishing critical limits
• Monitoring critical control points
• Establishing procedures for corrective action
• Recordkeeping
• Verification
HACCP provides for the risk, or hazard, assessment that has to be done prior to
implementation of a quality control system, and for the ongoing management of
identified risks.
ISO 22000 is a commercial food safety management standard that makes use of
the HACCP principles and methodology to develop a HACCP plan. A HACCP plan is
a document that describes how an organisation plans to manage and control its
food safety hazards, and contains at least the following information:
• Identified critical control points (CCP’s)
• Hazards that must be controlled at each CCP
• Control measures for each CCP
• Critical limits to be applied at each CCP
• Procedures for monitoring CCP’s
• Procedures for remedial action when limits are exceeded
ISO 22000 provides for combining the HACCP plan with prerequisite programs
(PRP’s) and operational prerequisite programs (OPRP’s) into a single
integrated food safety management strategy.
Prerequisite programs (PRPs) are the conditions that must be established
throughout the food chain and the activities and practices required to establish and
maintain a hygienic environment. PRPs must be suitable and capable of providing
food that is safe for human consumption. PRPs are also referred to as good
hygienic practices, good agricultural practices, good production practices, good
manufacturing practices, good distribution practices, and good trading practices.
My Notes …
. .................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
3. Workplace Research
Conduct workplace research to obtain information about implementing a recordkeeping
system that will meet all the requirements of traceability – i.e. give a complete list of all
the documented records with physical examples attached for each step listed below.
Now draw up a suggested HACCP plan for your farm according to the criteria listed below,
and include a summary of information for the following information flow in your
workplace:
Identify Hazards to food
Risk Assessment Safety
Conduct an exposure
assessment
My Notes …
. .................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
2 .1 Introduction
‘Good practices’ is a term that has come into use in recent years to describe the
good way to do or manage things. This is often put in place of strict regulations
where producers are encouraged to comply to Good Practices through education
and incentives. Self monitoring then becomes an important tool in the Good
Practices System. Guidelines for Good Practices have been developed for just about
every activity in every field, from good trading practices to good marketing
practices to good fund raising practices.
Good practice guidelines aims to improve the manner in which a variety of business
conduct themselves, by integrating for instance good social practices with good
agricultural practices.
The management and maintenance of GAP are closely linked with recordkeeping
and the concepts and process flow associated with traceability, and should be
targeted for internal monitoring, internal audits, and inspections by external
auditors and inspectors.
Good manufacturing practices are guidelines that manufacturers use to ensure the
quality, consistency and safety of products and processes. GMP is often used
simultaneously with GAP and includes practices used in sorting, packing, storage
and transportation operations.
Good social practices address a wide range of environmental issues and are not
only applicable to agriculture. These issues include:
Agricultural land and land that has been used for activities other than agriculture
can be contaminated with pathogenic organisms or toxic chemical substances.
Obtaining a history of the prior use of the land is important because it helps
identify these potential hazards. In addition, the failure of prior users to follow
Good Agricultural Practices can offer risks of contamination to produce grown on
the soil.
It is important to obtain information about the previous use of the land where
agricultural production is taking place. This can be done through interviews with
prior owners, a review of municipal permits, or from other sources. This
background information can help in the identification of situations that can increase
the risk for fresh produce contamination.
Cultivated Land Information
Information that should be obtained about the history of the land includes
if the land is being used or has been used for:
• Animal feeding or domestic animal production
• Barns or other housing of farm animals
• Garbage or toxic waste disposal, sanitary waste management
• Mining activities, or oil or gas extraction
Other information that should be obtained includes:
• If the land has experienced any serious flooding
• If the land has been treated in an uncontrolled manner with organic or
inorganic fertilisers and / or pesticides.
Prior use of the land for animal feeding or domestic animal production can
greatly increase the risk of contamination of fruit and vegetables with
pathogens commonly found in the intestinal tract of animals. The potential for
contamination from this source is related to the time that has passed since the
land was used for animal feeding or production. The risk of contamination will
also be influenced by conditions such as atmospheric temperature, sunlight and
relative humidity.
The presence of barns or farm animals a short distance from the cultivation site
increases the risk of product contamination. An assessment of the location of
the animals and their facilities and an evaluation of drainage systems and water
currents flowing near these areas will help determine the potential for
contamination. In some instances it may be necessary to create physical
barriers or channels to divert water which may carry contaminants from the
animals.
When the land has been used for garbage disposal or as a waste management
site, it may contain decomposing organic matter and faecal material.
Depending on the garbage contents, soil microbial loads can be extremely high
and the soil may also contain harmful chemicals or toxic contaminants.
Land that has been used for mining or petroleum extractions can be
contaminated with heavy metals or hydrocarbons. Even if the contamination is
located on a small portion of the land, factors such as rainfall and subterranean
water flow should be evaluated. Analysis of toxic substances in the soil and a
review of the environmental compliance of the extraction operation are
recommended when the ground history indicates a high risk for chemical
hazards.
Heavy flooding can increase the sources of contamination. Water runoff can
introduce pathogens and chemical contaminants from remote areas. Dead
animals and standing water that remains after the floodwater have receded can
lead to significant bacterial hazards. Individual assessment of each flooding
situation is necessary, along with a review of the time that has passed since the
flood and other conditions that can mitigate or reduce the risks. When there is
concern about the safety of the site, microbiological analyses after the flooding
has occurred may assist in identifying contamination.
Even if the investigation of the prior use of the land indicates that it has been
used solely for agricultural production, prior production practices should be
reviewed. Improper use of organic fertilisers may result in microbiological
contamination of the soil, while inorganic fertiliser and / or pesticides used
improperly can cause serious chemical hazards. Chemical compounds should
have been used according to label recommendations and the products should
be registered for use on the specific crop.
The land owner or operator should research both the present and prior use of
adjacent lands to identify potential sources of contamination and precautions
that need to be taken to prevent contamination of fresh produce in the
orchards.
Contamination from areas away from the actual growing area can reach
produce through a variety of means including water, wind, workers, vehicles, or
equipment moving from one area to another.
During agricultural production of fruits and vegetables, water is used for numerous
activities in the field, including pesticide and fertiliser applications and irrigation.
Other water uses during produce handling include cooling, washing, waxing and
the movement of fruit. In addition to activities where water comes in direct contact
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
31
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
with produce, field and pack house workers use water for drinking and hand
washing.
Poor quality water may be a direct source of contamination and also an important
vehicle for spreading micro-organisms in the production field. The severity of the
hazard resulting from poor quality water will depend on the type and number of
micro organisms in the water and their capacity to survive on the produce.
In addition to the quality of the water, other factors that can increase the risk of
contamination of produce by water include the stage of development and type of
crop, the time between the contact of the produce with the water and harvest, and
other water and produce handling practices. Fruits and vegetables with large
surface areas, such as leafy vegetables, or those where the surface structure allows
pathogens to adhere easily, are at a greater risk of contamination from water.
This risk can be further increased when the contact with contaminated water takes
place near harvest time or during post harvest handling.
Among the most common sources of agricultural water are surface rivers,
streams, and open canals. Other sources include reservoirs such as swamps,
lakes, tanks, ground water from boreholes and, occasionally, public water
systems.
Water destined for agricultural production can easily become contaminated with
human and / or animal faeces. It is important to keep animals and children out
of the orchards and to provide field workers with properly constructed and
maintained restrooms or mobile sanitary units. Water contamination with
human faecal material also can occur if wells and water systems are not
Wildlife, including insects, rodents, reptiles, and birds, can carry diseases. Since
these are found even in the most pristine environments, absolute protection of
water is difficult and minimisation of potential contamination by wildlife should
be the goal.
It is generally believed that ground water is less likely than surface water to be
contaminated with pathogens since ground water generally loses much of its
bacterial and organic content after filtration though rock and clay layers. The
bacterial content of ground water may vary from a few to a few hundred
organisms per millilitre. However, under certain conditions, such as with
shallow, old, or improperly constructed wells, the potential for contamination of
ground water by surface water is a great risk.
Irrigation is the controlled application of water to the land or field with the
purpose of providing the moisture levels required for the appropriate
development of the plant. Irrigation plays a major role in achieving cultivable
lands, especially in arid and semi-arid regions.
When chemigation systems are not properly designed, they can result in serious
ground water contamination, increasing the risk of chemical contamination of
fresh produce. Safety equipment is available that can prevent back-flow and
subsequent groundwater contamination. This equipment is relatively
inexpensive and can prevent serious hazards.
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
33
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
In the case of fertilisers, it important to know the plant toxicity of the specific
fertiliser and to pay close attention to calculated and recommended dosage
rates and schedules of application.
In the case of fertilisers, it important to know the plant toxicity of the specific
fertiliser and to pay close attention to calculated and recommended dosage
rates and schedules of application.
Agricultural Water Microbiological Testing Procedures
Animal manure and solid biological waste may provide safe, effective fertiliser when
properly treated. If the treatment is inadequate, or if no treatment is used, the risk
of contamination of fruit and vegetables with pathogenic micro-organisms is
extremely high. The rate of survival of contaminants in manure and their transfer
Raw materials commonly used for the production of organic fertilisers include:
• Animal manure
• Post-harvest material
• Organic waste
• Bio-solids / sludge (human waste)
Implementation of Soil and Water Conservation Principles – Inorganic
Fertilisers
Many inorganic fertilisers may cause residues which are unacceptable for export
requirements of certain markets. It is therefore very important to keep accurate
fertilisation records in order to complete the cycle of traceability as well as to
implement the relevant good agricultural practices.
All animals including mammals, birds, reptiles and insects are considered vehicles
for contamination with pathogenic organisms. A large number of micro-organisms
can be found on the surface of animals’ hair, feathers, hide, and skins, and in their
respiratory and gastrointestinal systems.
Maintain domestic and farm animals away from the fruit orchards and establish
physical barriers or vegetation to prevent entry of wild animals. These
precautions are especially important near harvest time.
Field workers should not be allowed to bring dogs, cats or other domestic
animals into the field, packaging areas or storage facilities.
Dead or trapped animals such as birds, insects, and rats, should be disposed of
promptly to avoid attracting other animals. Proper disposal procedures are to
bury or incinerate the animal.
It is important to keep areas around the orchards clean and neat to further
protect the plants and fruit. The following general guidelines should be adhered
to:
• Keep the grass short to avoid the presence of rats, reptiles and other pests.
• Keep all areas free of garbage.
• Remove all unnecessary equipment. Old and broken equipment provide
protection for rats and insects.
• Remove nests from fields and buildings
Animals and Water
Since animals are attracted by water, the presence of water in the orchards and
in the fruit packing or storage area should be limited to what is needed for
specific uses. In the packhouse, surfaces and floors should be kept clean and
as dry as possible to avoid water that may promote bacterial and pest growth.
Water tanks and storage containers should be capped to prevent access to
water sources.
Pest Control
In fresh produce operations, the term pest applies to all organisms that can
damage or contaminate fruit and vegetables during field production, packaging,
storage and distribution. Insects, micro-organisms, wild animals and weeds,
which can also harbour insects, vermin, etc., should all be considered in a pest
control program. This program should also extend to the packhouse, storage
facilities and vehicles used for transport.
Pests can be controlled through a variety of methods. Table 2.1 describes the
various pest control methods that are commonly used.
When selecting a pest control method, choose one that is approved for local,
regional and national level use and apply it appropriately.
Method Description
Biological Control Biological control uses living organisms for pest control. Biological
pesticides fall into three major classes, which is:
• Microbial pesticides that contain micro-organisms, such as
bacteria, fungi, or viruses, that attacks a specific pest.
• Plant pesticides that are substances that plants produce
from genetic material that has been added to the plant.
• Biochemical pesticides that are naturally-occurring
substances that control pests by non-toxic mechanisms, for
example pheromones.
Some plant growth regulators are naturally-occurring bio pesticides.
Biological control also includes the release of parasitic and
predaceous insects to control insect pests or weed species.
Plant Resistance Crop plants are bred to produce varieties that resist insects and
other pests. Crop plants are also genetically altered to allow them to
withstand herbicides so that only weeds are killed when treated with
chemical herbicides.
Cultural Control Cultural methods include crop rotation, soil tillage, the use of trap
crops, changing planting or harvesting time, intercropping with other
crops or with varieties that repel pests.
Mechanical and Mechanical and physical methods refer to techniques such as
Physical Control collecting pests with traps, suction devices or by hand, or such as
using fire, heat, cold, sound, or physical barriers or screens.
Chemical Control Chemical control methods make use of conventional pesticides,
which are synthetic chemicals that are intended to prevent, destroy,
repel or mitigate any pest.
Integrated Pest IPM is a pest management approach that uses all available pest
Management control methods, including the judicious use of pesticides, to
(IPM) optimise a crop's ability to resist the pest with the least hazard to
humans and the environment.
Integrated pest management supports the control of pests through
methods that are less dependent on chemicals. In recent years,
consumers of fresh produce are becoming more aware of the
chemicals that are applied to fresh produce and the demand is
therefore for a more integrated pest control strategy.
Pesticides are toxic chemicals that are used to protect crops, to control
household pests and nuisance insects, and to eliminate vectors of human and
animal diseases. Vectors are organisms that carry pathogens from one host to
another.
Classes of pesticides are commonly named after the pests that they help to
control, for instance insecticides control insects, herbicides control weeds,
fungicides control fungi, and rodenticides control rodents.
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
37
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
Since pesticides can be extremely harmful, they should be applied, handled and
stored in accordance with the instructions given on the label or on the
manufacturer's safety data sheet for the product. Because of the potential
health hazards associated with pesticides, application rates should be controlled
to limit the amount of residues on produce and only pesticides approved for use
on a specific product or in food processing facilities should be used.
Pesticides should be used only when needed and only in the amounts that will
adequately control pests. Minimising the amount of pesticide used reduces
costs and helps to protect the environment. The pesticide label is the ultimate
source of information for determining the proper application rates for a specific
pesticide.
It is recommended that growers document and verify that the pesticides used
come from certified distributors, and that competent authorities approved their
usage.
Pesticide Handling
Pesticide handling should be controlled through every phase, from acquisition
through storage to use in the fields. It is very important that the persons in
charge of handling these products are aware of the possible danger that they
hold, and follow the instructions printed on the label or on the information page
that usually accompanies the product.
Pesticide Application
Special attention should be paid to spray equipment, pumps and nozzles used
to apply pesticides. To minimise the potential for over or under treatment,
accidents and spills, they should be calibrated for accuracy and checked
frequently for malfunctions. Spray equipment should be regularly washed to
prevent possible contamination of fruits or vegetables with compounds not
authorised for that commodity and to avoid accidental overdosing.
Version: 01 Version Date: July 2006
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain
38
Primary Agriculture NQF Level 4 Unit Standard No: 1166278
Warning signs should be posted on fields that have recently been treated with
pesticides to prevent workers or visitors from inadvertently coming in contact
with treatment chemicals. Such signs should only be removed after the
established re-entry period into the field has passed so that residual levels are
at an acceptable level.
Pesticide Storage
High levels of pesticide residues on crops may be a hazard to humans who eat
the produce. To regulate pesticide residues, a legal limit known as the
maximum residue limit (MRL) is developed for each pesticide. The MRL is the
maximum level of residue of a chemical substance that is legally permitted to
remain in or on a crop when sold. This limit is used to provide reasonable
assurance that the consumer will suffer no adverse effects from consuming the
product, even over a lifetime of exposure.
Although strict adherence to MRLs might not be feasible for some countries
because of economic constraints, those countries relying on food export profits
should monitor for and comply with these MRL levels in order to maintain
credibility as responsible exporters.
If the guidelines contained in this document are strictly adhered to and the
pesticides are applied in the correct dosages, the risk of exceeding MRLs is
limited.
Pesticide Disposal
Records of training for the proper handling and application of pesticides should
include:
• Employee’s name
• Experience or employment date
• Position or job performed by the employee
• Date of training
• Training topics
• The institution responsible for training and instruction records or certificates
• Signature of trainer
Pesticide records must contain information on:
• Crop data (variety, planting date, etc.)
• Name of pesticides used
• Place of application
• Dosage
• Application dates
• Time period before harvest
• Name of the person responsible for the application
• Date of last equipment calibration
Soil
o current
o in the
future
Water Animals
o current o current
o in the o in the
future future
Consumer
o current
o in the
future
General symptoms that flag an employee with the potential for causing
microbial contamination of produce include:
• Diarrhoea
• Vomiting
• Dizziness
• Abdominal cramps
• Exposed or open wounds
• Hepatitis or jaundice (yellow colour of the skin)
Employees with gastrointestinal distress or open wounds can contaminate fresh
fruits and vegetables through handling. Persons that do not show any
symptoms of disease can transmit microbial pathogens. Many micro-organisms
can be guests in the human body without evidence of disease and can be
spread to others by the human hosts.
Sick employees should not participate in activities that involve direct contact
with the fresh produce or with packaging material until they have clearance
from a licensed healthcare provider.
Health Programs
Ideally, agricultural workers should have access to a health care system that is
accessible to them in their workplace. Workers have been shown to be more
willing to report symptoms of illness or disease if they have access to healthcare
professionals.
Any worker with exposed wounds that can directly contaminate fresh produce
should have these wounds properly disinfected and covered before participating
in production and handling activities. A first aid kit with supplies for treating
worker injuries should be readily available at the worksite.
It is also important for employers to provide fruit and vegetable handlers with a
training program on good food handling and hygiene practices. The possibility
of produce contamination is directly related to the quality of the worker training
program.
Drinking Water
Water for human consumption should be potable, which means that it should
be free of micro-organisms and chemical substances that can jeopardise the
health of the person consuming it. Ensuring the availability of potable drinking
water for field workers can minimise the risk of them developing disease and
consequently contaminating fresh produce.
Precautions that should be taken for the handling of drinking water in the fields
and packing areas include:
• Water supply systems should be in good condition and operating properly
• Water should be stored in clean, sanitised containers and tanks
• Water containers should be washed and sanitised on a daily basis
• Water storage containers should be closed at all times
• Containers should be kept out of the sun and away from excessive heat
• Disposable cups should be provided and each person should use a different
cup
Frequent microbiological and physical evaluation should be performed on
drinking water when the water is being stored or treated on site. Simple
evaluations of the colour, odour and taste of water should be performed as part
of the daily monitoring procedures.
If any of the water quality tests indicate the quality is not adequate, the water
should be replaced to reduce the chances of infection and the proper authorities
should be notified of the problem.
Most fresh fruits and vegetables are extremely perishable. The safety and quality
of the produce when it reaches the retail market is strongly influenced by the
safety and quality of the produce at harvest. Additional factors that affect safety
and quality of fresh produce at market include handling, storage temperature,
transportation conditions, and the time period between harvest and consumption.
Maintaining safe, high quality produce with an adequate shelf-life depends on both
the pre-harvest factors discussed earlier and the control measures taken
throughout the distribution chain. This chain begins with harvesting the produce.
With manual harvest, worker hygiene is especially important since there is a great
deal of hand contact with the product that could lead to contamination. Proper
sanitation of harvest tools is also critical to product safety.
Physical Damage
Post-Harvest Treatments
Practices that are used to reduce the risk of contamination of produce by post-
harvest processing water are as follows:
• Perform periodic water sampling and microbial testing
• Follow appropriate guidelines for pack house water sanitation
• Change water as necessary to maintain sanitary conditions
• Clean and sanitise water contact surfaces, such as dump tanks and wash
tanks
• Install backflow devices and legal air gaps to prevent contamination of clean
water with potentially contaminated water
• Routinely inspect and maintain equipment designed to assist in maintaining
water quality, such as chlorine injectors, filtration systems, and backflow
devices
Cooling Considerations
There are many different types of cooling systems available. Methods that are
commonly used to cool fresh produce include:
Of the commonly used commercial cooling methods, the ones using air and
vacuum present the lowest risk for contamination. However, the air introduced
in the cooling systems can represent a potential microbial hazard. Micro-
organisms found in dust and tiny water droplets can be introduced onto product
using these cooling systems. Such micro-organisms can come from outside
dust, soil, equipment, and waste products. These micro organisms cannot
develop in the air, but air can serve as the vehicle through which they can reach
the product.
Cooling methods using water and ice as the cooling mediums have the greatest
potential for contamination of fruits and vegetables. Water and ice used for
cooling operations are potential contamination sources. Water used in hydro-
cooling systems and for ice making should be potable and ice should be made
and held under sanitary conditions.
Implementation of Soil
and Water Conservation
Principles
Organic Fertilizers
Hazards Associated with
Animal Manure
Treatments to Reduce
the Risks
Good Agricultural
Practices in the
Management of Organic
Fertilizers
Hazards Associated with
Manure Treatment and
Storage Location
Precautions for the
Application of Organic
Fertilizers (Not
recommended for Citrus
Crops due to the adverse
influence on colour
development of fruit).
Keeping complete
records of organic
fertilizer preparation and
use is part of a Good
Agricultural Practices
program.
Inorganic Fertilization
Keeping complete
records of Inorganic
Fertilization Programs
Animal Exclusion from
production areas
Methods for Keeping
Animals Out of
Production Areas
Cleaning Considerations
for Surrounding Areas
Animals and Water
Pest Control
Pest Control in Fresh
Produce Operations
Common Pest Control
Procedures
Pesticides
Pesticide Handling
Pesticide Application in
the Field
Pesticide Storage
Pesticide Residues
Pesticide Disposal
Training and
Documentation
Worker Health and Safety
Relationship between
Worker Health and
Hygiene
Relationship between
Worker Health and
Hygiene
Health Programs
Worker Hygiene Training
Program
Safety Hazards
Associated with
Harvesting (Cont.)
Important Considerations
Regarding Water
Temperature and
Microbial Infiltration
Common Cooling
Methods for Fresh
Produce
Safety Hazards
Associated with Post-
Harvest treatments and
handling
My Notes …
. .................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
3. 1 Introduction
Now that we have examined traceability through effective recordkeeping, and
considerations regarding the management and maintenance of Good Agricultural
Practices, it is important to examine the implications of non-conformance and
explore possibilities for corrective actions.
Assuming that the food safety management system adheres to these requirements,
it follows that only non-conformance or non-compliance to the prescribed policies
and procedures can result in a product that does not conform to quality and safety
standards, because it was produced or manufactured during a period when critical
limits were violated or exceeded, or when an organisation has lost control of a
prerequisite program (PRP) or an operational prerequisite program (OPRP).
Many export or local contracts are based on the assurance provided by the
implementation of and management according to a food safety management
systems and adherence to Good Agricultural Practices. The buyer of fresh produce
would not be satisfied with a product that does not conform to the standards and
specifications. Additionally, it would raise concerns for the buyer if they find
repeated instances of non-conformance to the plan.
Regulations of importing countries allow for fruit that do not conform to quality and
safety standards to be quarantined and such fruit cannot be sold in that market.
This is done both on an ongoing basis, where the records that relate specifically to
identified risk areas, or critical control points, are monitored to ensure that critical
limits are maintained. If critical limits are exceeded at any critical control point, the
planned corrective action must be taken immediately to eliminate or control the
non-conformance.
Records related to traceability is also useful in determining the point at which non-
conformance occurred if it is found that the end-product does not conform to
safety and quality standards. Because traceability records are designed to provide
a complete picture of the process to which the fruit was subject, the point at which
the critical limits were exceeded can be identified if non-con-forming fruit is found.
My Notes …
...................................................................
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
4.1 Introduction
The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) describes audits as
follows: a systematic and independent examination to determine whether quality
activities and related results comply with planned arrangements and whether these
arrangements are implemented effectively and are suitable to achieve objectives.
The documented food safety management system on a farm can be of the highest
quality, but if it is not implemented correctly and consistently and if its prescriptions
and procedures are not followed, it is of no real value at all.
Internal audits are used to monitor and probe the integrity of the food safety
management system continuously and to thereby ensure that it is implemented as
prescribed. The internal auditor conducts regulatory system audits to verify that an
establishment's food safety management system, such as the HACCP system and
its prerequisite programs, HACCP plans and reassessment procedures, is
implemented as described and is continuously effective.
There are certain common elements that occur in all internal audit systems, being:
• An audit charter
• Risk assessment process
• An audit plan
• An audit cycle
• Audit work programs
• Audit reports
• Requirements for audit documentation
• Follow-up processes
• Professional development programs
Audit Charter
A risk assessment process describes and analyses the risks inherent in a given line
of business. The level of risk should be one of the most significant factors
considered when determining the frequency of audits.
Auditors should update the risk assessment at least annually, or more frequently if
necessary, to reflect changes to internal control or work processes, and to
incorporate new lines of business.
Audit Cycle
An audit cycle identifies the frequency of audits. Auditors usually determine the
frequency by performing a risk assessment, as noted above, of areas to be audited.
While staff and time availability may influence the audit cycle, they should not be
overriding factors in reducing the frequency of audits for high-risk areas.
Audit Plan
The audit plan details the internal audit budgeting and planning processes. The
plan describes audit goals, schedules, staffing needs, and reporting.
The audit plan should cover at least 12 months and should be developed by
combining the results of the risk assessment and the resources required to result in
the timing and frequency of the planned audit cycle.
The audit committee should formally approve the audit plan annually, or review it
annually in the case of multi-year audit plans. The internal auditors should report
the status of planned versus actual audits, and any changes to the annual audit
plan, to the audit committee for its approval on a periodic basis.
Audit work programs that set out for each audit area the required scope and
resources, including the selection of audit procedures, the extent of testing, and
the basis for conclusions. Well-planned, properly structured audit programs are
essential to strong risk management and to the development of comprehensive
internal control systems.
Audit Reports
Written audit reports inform the board and management of individual department
or division compliance with policies and procedures. These reports should state
whether operating processes and internal controls are effective, and describe
deficiencies as well as suggested corrective actions.
The audit manager should consider implementing an audit rating system approved
by the audit committee. The rating system facilitates conveying to the board a
consistent and concise assessment of the net risk posed by the area or function
audited.
Follow-Up Processes
Follow-up processes require internal auditors to determine the disposition of any
agreed-upon actions to correct significant deficiencies.
Professional Development Programs
Professional development programs must be in place for the institution’s audit staff
to maintain the necessary technical expertise.
• Personal hygiene
• Training
Below are examples of internal audit documents for each of these points. Please
note that these are examples only and that the work papers used on specific farms
will depend on the risk assessment and circumstances on that farm.
Chemical Storage
Chemical Storage
Auditor Responsible Person
17. Are MRL lists and safety data sheets present and
accessible?
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Fertilisers
Fertilisers
Auditor Responsible Person
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
My Notes …
....................................................................
....................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....................................................................
....................................................................
....................................................................
....................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
....................................................................
Personal Hygiene
Personal Hygiene
Auditor Responsible Person
6. Are all fingernails short and clean, with no nail varnish and
no false fingernails?
8. Are all cuts and open sores properly dressed with bandage
or a plaster?
12. Are all field toilets equipped with soap, water and
disposable towels?
13. Are all the toilets kept clean and is there a cleaning
schedule available?
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
Training
Training
Auditor Responsible Person
Signature Audit Date
Question Y/N Defects
1. Are all personnel operating machinery trained and do they
have the necessary certificates?
2. Are all personnel working with plant protection products
trained and do they have the necessary certificates?
3. Are all personnel trained in food hygiene and food safety
and do they have the necessary certificates?
4. Are all personnel trained in personal hygiene?
5. Are there at least one person trained in First Aid?
6. Are there in each harvesting team at least one person
trained in basic food handling hygiene?
Verify
Completion
Corrective Action Person Target Date Signature (Date and
Date
Signature)
My Notes …
....................................................................
....................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....................................................................
....................................................................
....................................................................
....................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
My Notes …
...................................................................
...................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................................................................
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .................................................................
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................................................................
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...................................................................
...................................................................
5 .1 Introduction
Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are written documents that describe step-
by-step in detail how a procedure should be done. SOPs describe both technical
and administrative operational elements of an organisation.
The standard operating procedure manual for food safety is to a large extent the
documentation for a food safety management system. The SOPs contained in the
manual is used during an internal audit to measure the actual procedures and
processes that are employed.
SOPs can also be used as a part of personnel training programs, since they should
provide detailed work instructions. When historical data are being evaluated for
current use, SOPs can be valuable for reconstructing project activities. In addition,
SOPs are frequently used as checklists by inspectors when auditing procedures.
Ultimately, the benefits of a valid SOP are reduced work effort, along with improved
data comparability, credibility, and legal defensibility.
It is important that each producer examines every aspect of the GAP list and
associated HAACP plan and draft specific operating procedures that will ensure food
safety principles are adhered to in line with his food safety management system.
A SOP manual should be organised to ensure ease and efficiency of use and to be
specific to the organisation that develops it. There is no one correct format –
internal formatting varies with each organisation and with the type of SOP being
written.
A SOP should be written with sufficient detail so that someone with a basic
understanding of the field can successfully reproduce the activity or procedure
when unsupervised.
SOPs should be written by individuals knowledgeable with the activity and the
organisation's internal structure. These individuals are essentially subject-matter
experts who actually perform the work or use the process. A team approach can
also be followed, especially for multi-tasked processes where the experiences of a
number of individuals are critical.
SOPs need to remain current. Therefore, whenever procedures are changed, SOPs
should be updated and re-approved.
SOPs should be also systematically reviewed on a periodic basis to ensure that the
policies and procedures remain current and appropriate, or to determine whether
SOPs are even needed. The review date should be added to each SOP that has
been reviewed. If a SOP describes a process that is no longer followed, it should
be withdrawn from the current file and archived.
The review process should not be overly cumbersome or SOPs will never get
reviewed. The frequency of review should be indicated by management in the
organisation’s quality management plan, which should also indicate the
individual(s) responsible for ensuring that SOPs are current.
5.4 Checklists
Many activities use checklists to ensure that steps are followed in order. Checklists
are also used to document completed actions. Any checklists or forms that is
included as part of an activity should be referenced at the points in the procedure
where they are to be used and then attached to the SOP. Remember that the
checklist is not the SOP, but a part of the SOP.
In some cases, detailed checklists are prepared specifically for a given activity. In
those cases, the SOP should describe, at least generally, how the checklist is to be
prepared, or on what it is to be based. Copies of specific checklists should be kept
in the file with the activity results or with the SOP.
The organisation should maintain a master list of all SOPs, and this file should
minimally include the date of the current version. This list may be used when
audits are being considered or when questions are raised as to practices being
followed within the organisation.
My Notes …
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
...................................................................................
3. Describe at least one Standard Operating Procedure that directly affects food
safety
My Notes …
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
..................................................................................
The assessor will complete a checklist that gives details of the points that are
checked and assessed by the assessor.
The assessor will write commentary and feedback on that checklist. They will
discuss all commentary and feedback with you.
You will be asked to give your own feedback and to sign this document.
It will be placed together with this completed guide in a file as part
of you portfolio of evidence.
The assessor will give you feedback on the test and guide you if there are
areas in which you still need further development.
Paperwork to be done …
Please assist the assessor by filling in this form and then sign as instructed.
Program Date(s)
Assessment Date(s)
Surname
First Name
Learner ID / SETA
Registration
Number
Home Language
Date of Birth
ID Number
Contact Telephone
Numbers
Email Address
Signature:
Postal Address
Bibliography
Books:
Encyclopaedia Britannica, South African Version
Guide to Minimise Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, 1998
www.world-food.net/scientficjournal/2003/issue1/pdf/Agriculture/V1N1A101-
106traceability.pdf
www.nri.org/NRET/SPCDR/Chapter5/quality-5-7.htm
www.jifsan.umd.edu/PDFs/GAPS_English/II__Good_Agricultural_Pract.pdf
www.praxiom.com/iso-22000-intro.htm
www.sunkist.com/growers/ag_practices/SOPs.doc
Users are free to produce and adapt this material to the maximum
benefit of the learner.
Acknowledgements
Project Management:
IMPETUS Consulting and Skills Development
Donors:
Citrus Academy
Developer:
Mr R H Meinhardt
Authenticator:
Prof P J Robbertse
OBE Formatting:
Ms B Enslin
Design:
Didacsa Design SA (Pty) Ltd
Layout:
Ms N Matloa
Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply chain
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
116278 Implement a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural
supply chain
SGB NAME REGISTERING PROVIDER
SGB Primary Agriculture
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 01 - Agriculture and Nature Conservation Primary Agriculture
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined Regular Level 4 3
REGISTRATION REGISTRATION START REGISTRATION END SAQA DECISION
STATUS DATE DATE NUMBER
Registered 2004-10-13 2007-10-13 SAQA 0156/04
Learners will gain an understanding of sustainable agricultural practices as applied in the animal, plant and
mixed farming sub fields. This unit standard focuses on the application of food safety principles in primary
agriculture.
Competent learners will be fully competent in food safety practices whereby providing the environment for
the application of quality practices and thus strengthen agricultural practices in general. They will be able
to participate in, undertake and plan farming practices with knowledge of their environment. This unit
standard will instil a culture of maintenance and care for both the environment as well as towards farming
infrastructure and operations.
• NQF 3: Apply of crop protection and animal health products effectively and responsibly.
• NQF 3: Explain store inputs categories, labelling and storage methods.
• NQF 3: Monitor and supervise a food safety and quality management system in the agricultural supply
chain.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Manage a traceability system demonstrating operational efficiency in the agricultural supply chain.
OUTCOME RANGE
Traceability system includes but is not limited to a system that allows for problems to be traced back to the
points of origin, both pre-harvest and post-harvest.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The purpose of a traceability system is explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
In relation to the local agricultural market and international agri-trade.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Practices, which will support operational efficiency of a traceability system are identified.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The record keeping which supports a traceability system is explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Evidence of traceability records provided.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Implement a record system on the farm.
OUTCOME RANGE
A record system includes but is not limited to a manual and electronic system that allows for a paper or
electronic trail of activities and management systems on the farm.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Evidence of good record keeping practices is provided.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Records include but are not limited to production, agrochemicals/ pests and diseases/ fertiliser/ irrigation/
application of chemicals, worker welfare/ safety/ security and training, soil management, soil history.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
Relevant documentation of the different activities of the agricultural enterprise is managed is described and
supplied.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The flow of information is controlled and accessed to ensure effective distribution of information.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The role of this process and how it complements the traceability process is discussed.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Manage and maintain good agricultural practices (GAP) associated with good manufacturing practices
(GMP), good health practices (GHP), good social practices (GSP) and good environmental practices (GEP).
OUTCOME RANGE
Management and maintenance includes but is not limited to ensuring that the activities of one regulatory
process compliments the other.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Concepts of good manufacturing practices in the agricultural food chain are described.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The complimentary nature of these regulatory processes and how it impacts on the management of the
agricultural enterprise are described.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The management and maintenance of above processes are explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The flow of the process to achieve the goals is illustrated.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Take decisions on reported non-conformances in respect of food safety, production, environmental, and
social practices and implement corrective action in the agricultural environment.
OUTCOME RANGE
Taking decisions and implementing corrective action includes but is not limited to addressing the problems
encountered in order to assist with the implementation of corrective processes in order to achieve the set
goals.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Examples of non-conformances and the effect thereof on quality of the product are described.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The role of traceability and record keeping system in the identification of non-conformances are described.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The effect of non-conformances is identified and explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
• Non-conformances relate to but are not limited to chemical, microbiological and physical contamination.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
Different types of corrective action are described and implemented.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5
Conduct internal audits according to the specifications of the trade/market in the agricultural environment.
OUTCOME RANGE
Internal audits include but is not limited to implementing checks and balances that assist the GMP to
ensure good agricultural practices in keeping with the rights of the workers and the environment.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
The purpose, importance and effect of an internal audit are explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The procedure of an internal audit is explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Within the standard operation procedures of the enterprise.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
An internal audit is performed.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
The management of such a process is explained and how the results assist with improving certain aspects
of the agricultural enterprise.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6
Maintain standard operational procedures with regard to agro-chemicals, food safety, quality, and
production practices, as well as environmental and social awareness within the agricultural supply chain.
OUTCOME RANGE
Standard operational procedures include but are not limited to food safety, quality, production practices,
environmental, and social awareness within the agricultural supply chain.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
Standard operation procedures of the enterprise are explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE
Related to food safety, quality, production practices, environmental and social awareness within the
agricultural supply chain.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
The management of the different aspects of the agricultural enterprise with respect to traceability and
regulatory procedures are described.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
The impact of non-conformance to the basic regulatory processes on the trade of the product is explained
and discussed.
The assessment should ensure that all the specific outcomes; critical cross-field outcomes and essential
embedded knowledge are assessed.
The specific outcomes must be assessed through observation of performance. Supporting evidence should
be used to prove competence of specific outcomes only when they are not clearly seen in the actual
performance.
Essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in its own right, through oral or written evidence and
cannot be assessed only by being observed.
The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a
qualifying learner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific
outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a qualifying learner is able to perform
the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential
embedded knowledge, then they should not be assessed as competent.
Evidence of the specified critical cross-field outcomes should be found both in performance and in the
essential embedded knowledge.
Performance of specific outcomes must actively affirm target groups of qualifying learners, not unfairly
discriminate against them. Qualifying learners should be able to justify their performance in terms of these
values.
• Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the
relevant ETQA.
• Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard or assessing this unit
standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA.
• Moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines
in the relevant qualification and the agreed ETQA procedures.
• Principles of regulatory and legal aspects with reference to the specific agricultural enterprise.
• A basic understanding of food-borne illnesses.
• A basic knowledge of the Impact of food safety and quality in trade.
• A thorough understanding of contamination risks and preventative measures.
• Contamination risks.
• Contamination preventative measures.
• A basic understanding of risk factors related to food safety.
• Be familiar with the principles of food safety and quality.
• Basic principles of environmental and conservation management.
• Basic principles of waste and pollution management.
• Basic principles of natural resource management.
• Local legislation such as Occupational Health and Safety, Health and Welfare,
• A basic understanding of procedures of internal audits, traceability, and management skills.