Disaster Management
Disaster Management
Disaster Management
ENGINEERING
UNIT I
SITE INVESTIGATION AND SELECTION OF
FOUNDATION
Methods of exploration – boring technology – Depth of boring
– Spacing of bore hole – Sampling – Methods -Thick, Thin wall
samplers, Stationery piston sampler – Penetration tests - Bore log
report – Data interpretation.
SITE INVESTIGATION AND SELECTION OF
FOUNDATION
Methods Of Exploration
Boring Technology
Depth Of Boring
Spacing Of Bore Hole
Sampling & Methods
Penetration Tests
Bore Log Report
Data Interpretation.
WORK SEQUENCE
1. Site Investigation
To obtain necessary information about the soil and hydrological
conditions at the site and to know the engineering properties of the soil
2. Site Reconnaissance
An visual inspection of the site and study of topographical features
3. Site Exploration
To provide reliable, specific and detailed information about the soil
and ground water conditions at the site
SITE INVESTIGATION
To obtain necessary information about the soil and
hydrological conditions at the site and to know the engineering
properties of the soil.
The process of determining the layers of natural soil
deposits that will underlie a proposed structure and their physical
properties is generally referred to as site investigation.
The field and laboratory studies carried out for obtaining the
necessary information about the sub soil characteristics including
the position of ground water table are termed as soil exploration.
Site investigation consists of:
Preliminary survey
Detailed investigation
Carrying out in-situ tests like penetration test, Plate load test
etc.,
Testing of soil samples in the laboratory for physical and
engineering properties.
Objective of Soil Investigation
To obtain
The sequence and the thickness of various soil layers.
The physical and engineering properties of each of the soil
layers.
Location of water table.
Detailed Exploration
It is followed as a supplement to general exploration which gives detailed
information's such as soil properties, ground water conditions.
It is opted for large engineering works, heavy loads & costly foundations are
involved.
METHODS OF SITE EXPLORATION
1. Open excavations
2. Borings
3. Sub-surface soundings
4. Geophysical methods
OPEN EXCAVATIONS
Test pits and trenches can be used for all types of soils
Cost of open excavations increased rapidly with depth
3. Wash boring
4. Percussion boring
5. Rotary boring
AUGER BORING
Augers are used in soft and cohesive soils
Hand augers are used for depth up to 6 metres
4. From which we can get soil-water slurry through the annular space b/w the drill rod
& the casing
5. We can guess the soil stratification from the rate of progress and the colour of wash
water
PERCUSSION BORING
This method is suitable for soil &
rock formations
Repeated blows of heavy chisel or
boring process
From which we can collect the soil
sample
ROTARY BORINGS
It is a very fast method of boring suitable for both soils and
rocks
A drill bit is fixed at the bottom of the drill rod and it is
rotated by a chuck and is always kept in firm contact with the
bottom of the hole
Here we use bentonite solution along with water to soften
the rocks
The mud returning upwards collected for testing
So it is called Mud rotary drilling
SUB-SURFACE SOUNDINGS
This method is generally used for determining the consistency of
cohesive soils or relative density of cohesion less soils
COMMON PROCEDURE
1. A rod encased in a sleeve is forced into the soil and the resistance to
penetration or with drawl is observed.
2. Variations in this resistance shows dissimilar soil layers
ADVANTAGES
faster and cheaper than boring
In erratic soil conditions soundings can be used
LIMITATIONS
Sounding gives no idea about the settlement characteristics of the soil
Soundings alone cannot provide sufficient data for the final design
METHODS OF SUB-SURFAFCE SOUNDING
There are two common types of Sub-Surface Soundings. They are,
1. Standard Penetration Test [ SPT ]
2. Cone Penetration Test [ CPT ] or Dutch Cone Test
STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
Concept:
SPT is a common in situ testing method used to determine the
geotechnical engineering properties of subsurface soils.
Where
Ne = Corrected value of overburden effect
N = actual values of blows
From several investigations, it is proven that the penetration
resistance or the value of N is dependent on the overburden pressure.
If there are two granular soils with relative density same, higher ‘N’ value will
be shown by the soil with higher confining pressure.
With the increase in the depth of the soil, the confining pressure also increases. So
the value of ‘N’ at shallow depth and larger depths are underestimated and
overestimated respectively.
CORRECTION FOR OVERBURDEN PRESSURE
1. For p0 <= 75 kPa
N = observed N-value
PROCEDURE
1. The test method consists of pushing an instrumented cone, with the tip facing down,
Into the ground at a controlled steady rate
2. A cone with base of 3.6 cm in diameter (10 sq.cm ) and an angle of 60 degree at the
vortex.
3. To find out the cone resistance, the cone alone is first forced down for a distance of
8cm and the maximum value of resistance is recorded.
4. Cone resistance qc (kg/sq.cm) is approximately equal to 10 times the penetration
resistance N.
5. This test is very useful in finding bearing capacity of pits in cohesion less soil
THE CONE PENETRATION TEST HAS BECOME
INTERNATIONALLY ONE OF THE MOST
WIDELY USED AND ACCEPTED TESTMETHODS
FOR DETERMINING
Shock waves are generated at a point on the ground surface, using a sledge hammer.
These waves travel deep into the ground and get refracted at the interface of two
different materials and to the ground surface.
The time of arrival of these waves at different locations on the ground surface are
recorded by geophones, which pick up the refracted waves.
The geophones convert the ground vibrations into electrical impulses and transmit
them to a recording apparatus.
When the distance between the vibration source and the geophone is short, the arrival
time will be that of a direct wave.
When the distance exceeds a certain value, the refracted wave will be the first to be
detected by the geophone.
SEISMIC OR REFRACTION METHOD
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY METHOD
DEPTH OF BORING
Significant Depth of Boring
Exploration should be carried to a depth up to which the
increase in pressure due to structural loading is likely to cause
perceptible settlement or shear failure
Intensity of Loading
Soil profile
Soil variability
Types of Samples
Un disturbed Soil
Disturbed Soil Samples
Samples
Sampling steps:
Same as for thin walled open drive sampling.
After the sample is taken the two halves of the tube can be seperated to expose the
sample
SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER (THICK WALL SAMPLER)
SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER (THIN WALL SAMPLER)
The sampler is a open end steel tube with a cutting edge
Sampling steps:
The sampler is placed at the bottom of the bore hole
The sampler pulled out and the sampler with the sample is transporter to the lab.
This type of sampling is suitable in soils having some cohesion. Not suitable in hard
soils and gravels
SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER
STATIONARY PISTON SAMPLER
This consists of:
Sampler tube
Piston
Sampling steps:
Sampler tube with the piston is placed at the bottom of bore hole
The sampler is pushed into the soil keeping the piston at the bottom of the bore hole
Negative pressure is created if the soil tends to move downwards. This helps to
retain the sample
STATIONARY PISTON SAMPLER
BORELOG REPORT
DEFINITION :
Information on subsurface conditions obtained from the boring operation is
typically presented in the form of a boring record, commonly known as “boring log”
It is a record, made by the driller or geologist, of the rocks penetrated in the
borehole. In the laboratory, a more detailed log is prepared giving particulars relating to
lithology, palaeontology, water analysis, etc.
DETAILS IN BORELOG PERIOD :
1. Description or classification of various soil and rock type
2. Ground water table details
3. Test data
CHECKLISTS IN BORELOG REPORT
1. Introduction
2. Description of the proposed structure
3. Location and geological condition of the site
4. Methods of exploration
5. Number of borings, their depth and location
6. General description of sub-soil condition as obtained from the SPT and cone test
7. Details and results of the laboratory test conducted
8. Depth of ground water table and its fluctuations
9. Discussions of the results
10. Recommendation about allowable bearing pressure, depth and type of foundation
11. Conclusions and limitations of the investigations
SAMPLE BORELOG REPORT
74
DATA INTERPRETATION
Data Interpretation refers to the process of determining the
significance of important information, such as survey results, experimental
findings, observations, narrative report.
Example: Bore hole data interpretation
Borehole is small diameter vertical hole drilled into ground to take
samples for soil investigation and evaluation.
Errors in borehole data interpretation for site investigation is discussed.
Borehole data is used to specify suitable types of foundation for
structure.
While boreholes are interpreted, certain errors are highly likely to be
made which could be fatal for the foundation and safety of the structure.
ERRORS IN BOREHOLE DATA INTERPRETATION
Bedrock misinterpretation
5 Soft Clay But Firmness Increases With 1.Friction Piles Or Pier Foundations
Depth 2. Raft Or Mat Foundations Also Considered
6 Hard Clay Piers Or Pile Foundations
Deep foundations
Loads are transmitted over large depth
Pile foundation is an example
Df > B
(Df /B) >15
Types of shallow foundations
Strap footing
Location of foundation:
If a new foundation is to be laid near a existing structure, then the bottom edge of
the near foundation must be at minimum distance ‘S’ away from the old
foundations where S is the larger of the two foundations widths.
The depth of new foundation should be such that the line drawn from the
bottom edge of old foundation (at 30° for average soil and 45° for soft soil) should
not intersect the bottom edge of the new foundation as shown in the figure.
Foundations at different level:
(a) For footing in granular soil, a line drawn between the lower adjacent edges of
adjacent foundations should not have a slope steeper than 2 H: 1 V, as shown
figure.
(b) For footing in clay soils, a line drawn between the lower adjacent
edge of the upper footing and upper adjacent edge of lower footing
should not have a slope steeper than 2H: 1 V as shown in figure.
Requirements of a safe / satisfactory foundation
A foundation must satisfy the following criterion
1. Location and depth criterion – Must be properly located and
founded at a proper depth as per codal provisions
2. Bearing capacity criterion – The loading pressure on the
foundation should be less than the bearing capacity by an
adequate margin. A factor of safety of 3 is usually adopted.
i e , loading pressure ,q < net bearing capacity / 3 (factor of safety)
3. Settlement criterion – The settlement of the foundation under
the applied load should be less than the permissible settlement
prescribed in building codes
BEARING CAPACITY
Bearing capacity is the power of foundation soil to hold the forces from the
superstructure without undergoing shear failure or excessive settlement.
Beyond a certain loading pressure, the foundation settles rapidly or sinks into
the ground causing rupture of the ground.
This loading pressure at which the failure by rupture of the ground takes
place is termed as ‘Bearing capacity’ of the foundation.
BASIC DEFINITION
1. GROSS PRESSURE INTENSITY
Gross pressure intensity (q) is the intensity of pressure at the base of foundation due to load
from super structure, self weight of foundation and overburden, if any.
Net pressure intensity (qn) is gross pressure intensity minus the over burden pressure at the
level of base of foundation prior to excavation.
qn = q – ϒD
Where,
D = Depth of foundation
3. ULTIMATE BEARING CAPACITY
Ultimate bearing capacity (qf) is the minimum gross pressure intensity at which the soil
at the base of foundation fails by shear.
Net ultimate bearing capacity (qnf) is the minimum net pressure intensity at which the
soil at the base of foundation fails by shear.
qnf = qf − ϒD
Net safe bearing capacity (qns) is the maximum net pressure intensity to which the soil at
the base of foundation can be subjected without risk of shear failure.
qns = qnf / F
Safe bearing capacity (qs) is the maximum gross pressure intensity to which the soil at the base
of foundation can be subjected without risk of shear failure.
qs = qf / F or more appropriately,
qs = qns + ϒD or,
qs = (qnf / F) + ϒD
Allowable bearing pressure (qa) is the maximum gross pressure intensity to which the soil at the
base of foundation can be subjected without risk of shear failure and excessive settlement detrimental
to the structure.
qa = qna + ϒD
Where,
Continuous, well defined and distinct failure surface develops between the edge of
footing and ground surface.
Dense or stiff soil that undergoes low compressibility experiences this failure.
State of plastic equilibrium is reached initially at the footing edge and spreads gradually
downwards and outwards.
Local Shear Failure
This type of failure occurs in medium dense sand with relative density between 35 – 70
%.
At failure only a small portion of soil underneath the footing participates and well-
defined rupture surfaces develop only at points directly below the footing.
Local shear failure is accompanied by large strain (e> 10 to 20%) in a soil with
considerably low (ø<28) and low N (N < 5) having low relative density (ID> 20%).
The following are some characteristics of local shear failure
A significant compression of soil below the footing and partial development of plastic
equilibrium is observed.
Failure surface does not reach the ground surface and slight bulging of soil around the
footing is observed.
In this type of failure, footing penetrates into the soil without any bulging in the
soil at the surface.
Increase in vertical load increases the vertical movement and compression in the
foundation soil.
The failure is accompanied by vertical shear around the perimeter of the footing.
At failure, soil outside the loaded area does not participate and there will be no
movement of soil on the sides of the footing.
The following are some characteristics of punching shear failure
The soil mass above the footing base can be replaced by an equivalent surcharge
Based on the above assumptions, the ‘ultimate bearing capacity’ or the ‘gross ultimate
bearing capacity’ for a continuous footing qu is give as
qu gross = c Nc + γ Df Nq + 0.5 γ B Nr
where,
c = cohesion
γ = unit weight of the soil
Df = depth of foundation / footing
B = width of footing
Nc ,Nq , Nγ - bearing capacity factors. These are function of ø ; these values are read
from the chart
qu net = qu gross - γ Df
qu gross = c Nc + γ Df (Nq – 1)+ 0.5 γ B Nr
Factors affecting bearing capacity:
c ,ø ,γ of the soil
Depth , Df and width,B of footing / foundation
(a) shape (square , rectangular , circular)
(b) mode of failure (general shear ,local shear)
(c) depth of water table
Shape of foundation
Modification for square , rectangular and circular footings
for square / rectangular footing
qu net = 1.2 c Nc + γ Df (Nq – 1) + 0.4 γ B Nγ
for Circular footing
qu net =1.2 c Nc + γ Df (Nq – 1) + 0.3 γ B Nγ
B = smaller size of the rectangular footing / diameter of the
circular footing
Mode of failure:( local shear failure )
The equation for bearing capacity is obtained based on
general shear failure. Local shear failure occurs in loose sand
and soft clays. In such cases the cohesion value is taken as 2/3 c
and the bearing capacity factors are read from the dotted line
curves of the chart.
Accordingly, the equate for bearing capacity is written as
for continuous footing
qunet = 2/3 c N’c + γ Df (N’q – 1) + 0.5 γB Nγ’
for square / rectangular footing
qunet = 1.2 * 2/3 c Nc’ + γ Df (N’q – 1) + 0.4γB N’γ
for circular footing
qunet = 1.2 * 2/3 c Nc’ + γ Df (N’q – 1) + 0.3 γB N’γ
Effect of water table
The position of W.T. affects the bearing capacity.
The effect of W.T is illustrated for a rectangular
footing. The effect is incorporated in the same
manner in all other cases.
when water table is more than ‘B’ below base
No effect of W.T on bearing capacity
BIS (IS) formula for bearing capacity
IS : 6403 – 1981 has recommended the following formula which accounts for
(i) shape of footing (ii) depth of footing (iii) inclination of load
qunet = c Nc Sc dc ic + γ Df (Nq – 1) Sq dq iq + 0.5 γ B Nγ Sγ dγ iγ
Sc , Sq , Sr ----------shape factors
dc , dq , dr -------------depth factors
ic , iq , ir ----------------inclination factors
consideration of W.T , local shear failure are done the sand way as in
Terzaghi’s eqn
FACTORS AFFECTING BEARING CAPACITY
Total and differential settlements
Location of ground water
Initial stresses
Nature of soil
Physical and engineering properties of soil
Nature of proposed foundation
Size and shape of the foundation
Depth of foundation below the ground surface
Rigidity of the foundation structure
PLATE LOAD TEST
Plate load test is performed to determine the ultimate load bearing capacity of soil over the in-
situ conditions.
The plate load test is mandatory in case of designing foundation over the sandy and clayey soil.
This test gives the highest rate of accuracy determining the safe bearing capacity of soil in case
of shallow foundations.
This test determines the Ultimate Bearing capacity of Soil, Settlement of foundation & Allowable
bearing pressure of soil.
Plate load test is suitable for Cohesion less soil as in case of Cohesion soil the settlement takes
place in longer duration which this test is not suitable.
In this test, the square rigid plate having dimensions 300mm x 300mm or Circular rigid plate
having dia 300mm (larger dia plates may also used if the soil is in very loose condition) is placed
on a foundation and load is applied in increments on the plate with the help of hydraulic jack.
Then the settlement per each load increment is recorded to calculate the bearing capacity of the
soil.
Varieties in Plate load test and their durations:-
Plate load test is performed under two variations:
1) Gravity load test (Reaction Loading method)
2) Reaction truss method
The total duration required to perform a complete test varies from 6-7 days which includes
installations, test, dismantling.
The results of the test in case of soft strata can be obtained within a few hours whereas in case of
hard strata it might take close to a couple of days.
1.Gravity load test
The hydraulic jack is provided in between the rigid plate and top of
the column to transfer the load properly.
2.Reaction truss method
Excavating tools
Hydraulic jack (ball socket type with 50 T capacity)
Mild steel plate (25 mm thickness & (30*30) cm)
Dial gauges (minimum 3)
Reaction beam and reaction truss with soil nails
Plum Bob ( To determine center)
PLATE LOAD TEST PROCEDURE
The pit is excavated over the site of test with the size of 1.5×1.5m and to the depth of proposed foundations.
One needs to find the centre of excavated pit and portion to the size of the plate is eroded to the depth 1-2 cm.
Ensure that the foundation area must be 5 times the area of plate and the seating load of 0.07Kg/cm² is applied
to prevent undulations below the plate.
The eroded portion is filled with rock dust in order to counter undulations and that of plate installed is
completely horizontal which on later is checked by tube level.
Spacers are installed over the hydraulic plate on which hydraulic jack is installed.
The hydraulic jack in order to counter the load applies pressure which in result leads to transmission of
pressure over the plate.
Setting load of 7kN/m² is applied for some time and released. This is followed by the application of safe load
with an increment of 30%.
In case of loading through truss, both free sides are anchored with soil nails with uniformly loading at the
ends.
Results recording:
Dial gauges arranged at the bottom of the pit record are used to
record settlement at every 5 minutes for first 30 minutes and every 10
minutes for rest 30 minutes.
Where,
Sp = Settlement of plate, mm
Sf = Settlemnt of footing, mm
Bp = Width or dia of plate, m
B = Width of footing, m
Allowable bearing pressure (or) stress and loadand resistance
factor design:
There are two design procedures used in practice in North
America.
Allowable stress design (ASD
∑iρiPi <φiRi
COMPONENTS OF SETTLEMENT:
Primary Consolidation
Secondary Consolidation
Uniform settlement
When all points settle with equal amount, then the settlement is called uniform
settlement
ALLOWBLE SETTLEMENT:
Average settlement ranging from 20 mm to 300 mm have been
permitted in engineering practice ,depending on the type of soil,
structure, construction type.
According to IS 1904 permits tolerable settlement S as under,
Sand clay
(a) Isolated 60 mm 75 mm
foundations
(b) Raft foundations 65 mm 100mm
According to British code permits tolerable settlement S as
under,
Sand clay
(a) Isolated 50 mm 75 mm
foundations
(b) Raft foundations 75 mm 125 mm
Methods of minimizing settlement and differential settlement:
Preloading or pre-compaction to decrease compressibility.
Decreasing the effective load by floating foundation effect.
Strap footing
Combined footing
Contact Pressure
On the underside of the footing, the soil reaction produce a
upward pressure which is assumed uniform in deriving
different relationship for soil-structure interaction problem.
This pressure is called contact pressure.
FACTORS INFLUENCING CONTACT PRESSURE
The actual distribution of contact pressure depends upon a
number of factors such as
3) Thickness of footing
Different characteristics of contact pressure distribution
under flexible and rigid footings are described below:
1. Flexible Footing
2. Rigid Footing
CONTACT PRESSURE ON SATURATED CLAY
Flexible Footing
When a footing is flexible, it deforms into shape of bowel, with the maximum deflection at the
center. The contact pressure distribution is uniform.
Rigid Footing
When a footing is rigid, the settlement is uniform. The contact pressure distribution is
minimum at the center and the maximum at the edges. The stresses at the edges in real soils can
not be infinite as theoretically determined for an elastic mass. In real soils, beyond a certain
limiting value of stress, the plastic flow occurs and the pressure becomes finite.
CONTACT PRESSURE ON SATURATED CLAY
CONTACT PRESSURE ON SAND
Flexible footing
In this case, the edges of flexible footing undergo a large
settlement than at the centre.
The soil at the centre is confined and, therefore, has a high
modulus of elasticity and deflects less for the same contact
pressure. The contact pressure is uniform.
CONTACT PRESSURE ON SAND
Rigid footing
If the footing is rigid, the settlement is uniform. The contact
pressure increases from zero at the edges to a maximum at
the centre.
The soil, being unconfined at edges, has low modulus of
elasticity. However, if the footing is embedded, there would
be finite contact pressure at edges.
CONTACT PRESSURE ON SAND
CONSEQUENCE OF ASSUMING UNIFORMITY IN
PRESSURE
For convenience, the contact pressure is assumed to be uniform for all types of
footings and all types of soils if load is symmetric.
It will give a conservative design for rigid footings on sandy (cohessionless) soils,
as the maximum bending moment is overestimated.
UNIFORM PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION
TYPES OF RAFT FOUNDATION:
FLAT TYPE:
In this type of mat foundation a mat of uniform thickness is
provided.
This type is most suitable when the column loads are relatively
light and the spacing of columns is relatively small and uniform.
FLAT PLATE THICKENED UNDER COLUMN:
When the column loads are heavy this column is thickened to
provide enough thickness for negative bending moment and
diagonal shear.
Sometimes instead of thickening a slab, a pedestal is provided
under each column above the slab to increase the thickness.
BEAM AND SLAB CONSTRUCTION:
In this type of construction, the beams run in two perpendicular
directions and a slab is provided between the beams. The
columns are located at the intersection of beams.
This type is suitable when the bending stresses are high because
of large column spacing and unequal column loads.
BOX STRUCTURES:
In this type of mat foundation, a box structure is provided in
which the basement walls acts as a stiffeners for the mat.
Boxes may be made of cellular construction or rigid frame
consisting of slabs and basement walls. This type of mat
foundation can resist very high bending stresses.
MATS PLACED ON PILES:
The mat is supported on the piles in this type of construction.
This type of mat is used where the soil is highly compressible
and the water table is high.
This method of construction reduces the settlement and also
controls buoyancy.
ADVANTAGES:
The foundation and ground floor slab is poured at the same time
so which reduces our construction time and material.
It requires less excavation.
It is provided where the shallow foundation is possible but the
condition of the soil is poor.
Reduces the cost of constructing a floor slab (But not fully
economical).
It helps in the transferring of loads over a wide area.
It shows good resistance and cannot slide during the flood.
We can handle more heavy loads as compared to other types of
foundation.
DISADVANTAGES:
Raft foundation requires a large quantity of steel and
concrete.
This foundation is costly (Volume of footing was increasing).
It is not suitable and used for domestic home construction.
Special measurement is needed in case of concentrated loads.
In the mat foundation, skilled laborers are required.
FLOATING FOUNDATION
A building support on soft soil that consists of a stiff reinforced concrete slab
which distributes the concentrated loads by columns to the soil so that the
pressure intensity on the soil is nowhere more than the acceptable amount.
The weight of the building approximately equal to the full weight of soil and
water removed from the site of the building.
The water level has not changed the neutral pressure are therefore
unchanged.
PILE FOUNDATION
Types of piles and their function – Factors influencing the selection of
pile – Carrying capacity of single pile in granular and cohesive soil – static formula
– dynamic formulae (Engineering news and Hileys) – Capacity from insitu tests
(SPT and SCPT) – Negative skin friction – Group capacity and efficiency (Feld’s
rule, Converse – Labarra rule and block failure) – Settlement of pile groups –
Interpretation of pile load test (routine test only) – Under reamed piles – Capacity
under compression and uplift.
PILES
PILES
Piles are the long slender members either driven or cast in situ
Piles are subjected to vertical or lateral loads or a combination of
vertical and lateral loads
Piles are also used to take up uplift loads
Piles may be used as a single pile or a group of piles
CLASSIFICATION OF PILES
ANCHOR PILES
Anchor piles provide anchorage against horizontal pull from sheet piling
or other pulling forces
SIMPLEX PILE
It is a tube of cast of diameter 40 cm, has an underneath heel, it is banged
underground by an automatic hammer until reaching the arable land for the
establishment, then concrete is poured inside it and banged by another hammer
This pile can bear about 40 – 50 ton.
FRANKIE PILE
It is a number of tubes entering each other in order to easily access to
great depths within the earth
This pile can carry a load of 50 – 80 ton.
CLASSIFICATION
SIMPLEX PILE
OF CAST IN SITU PILES
FRANKIE PILE
CLASSIFICATION OF CAST IN SITU PILES
VIBRO PILE
It is a steel pipe of diameter 40 cm, has a conical heel with a separate
flange, it is banged underground by an automatic hammer until reaching the
arable land for the establishment, then the heel is removed and put into a tube,
after that concrete is poured
This pile can bear about 60 ton.
UNDER REAMED PILE
This pile is used at black clayey soil and lands of non residual soil, so this
soil is very dangerous to be established on it.
Piles with open tubes without heel, then concrete are poured inside the
tube
The pipe has a diameter of 40 cm and an average concrete well of 12 to 15
meters depending on the level of land to be established
CLASSIFICATION
VIBRO PILES
OF CAST IN SITU PILES
UNDER REAMED PILES
CLASSIFICATION OF CAST IN SITU PILES
STRAUSS PILE
Which is very similar to the Simplex pile but without a heel
Soil can be removed from the tubes by special devices and concrete
is poured instead of soil
The maximum load that can be carried by these piles is from 20 –
25 ton.
RAYMOND PILE
Which consists of cylindrical chips inside each other with a
diameter of 40 – 60 cm at the top of the pile and 20 – 28 cm at the bottom.
It is banged inside by a Mandrill and the cylindrical chips are
leaved in the soil and filled with concrete.
CLASSIFICATION
STRAUSS PILE
OF CAST IN SITU PILES
RAYMOND PILE
CLASSIFICATION OF PILES
TIMBER PILES
Timber piles are made of tree trunks with the branches trimmed off which should
be of sound quality and free of defects
The length of the pile may be of 15m or more
Diameter at the butt end may varies from 30 to 40 cm
Diameter at the tip end should not be less than 15cm
STEEL PILES
Steel piles are usually rolled H-Shapes or Pipe piles.
H-piles are proportioned to withstand large impact stresses during hard driving
The optimum load range on steel piles is 400 to 1200KN
COMPOSITE PILES
The upper and lower portions of composite piles are made of different materials
1. Steel and Concrete
2. Timber and Concrete
CLASSIFICATION OF PILES
2 3
S
Piles Piles
7
Piles
47 S 6 S
Piles S S
GROUP OF PILES
Most pile foundations contain group of
piles instead of single pile.
The piles forming the group of piles may be arranged in
square, rectangular, triangular or circular as per the
requirement.
The bearing capacity of pile group may not be
necessarily equal the sum of the bearing capacity of
individual piles forming a group.
EFFICIENCY GROUP OF PILES
49
The efficiency of a pile group is define as the ratio of the load carrying
capacity of the pile group to the sum of the load carrying capacities of the
individual piles.
Helmet
Crane
Pile
Stabbing
Pile Gate Points
PILE HAMMER
Drop hammer.
Single acting hammer.
Diesel hammer.
Vibratory hammer.
Drop Hammer Hammer
Guide
Driving
53 shoe
DROP HAMMER
Low operation
Low equipment cost
Simple
DROP HAMMER
A hammer (or ram or monkey) is raised by winch and
allowed to fall or drop by gravity on the top of the pile.
The drop hammer is provided with lugs so that it can
slide in the leads.
A lifting eye or hook is provided to tie it with the rope.
The weight of drop hammer varies from 0.5 to 2 tones (5
to 20 kN).
The height of fall may vary from 1.5 to 3 meters.
The number of blows that can be imparted varies from 4
to 8 per minute.
SINGLE ACTING HAMMER
If the hammer is raised by steam, compressed air or internal combustion,
but is allowed to fall by gravity along, it is called a single acting hammer.
The energy of such hammer is equal to the weight of the ram times the
height of fall.
The weight of single acting hammer is about 2 tonnes (20kN).
The fall is about 1 meter.
the number of blows of the hammer may vary from 50 to
60 per minute.
SINGLE ACTING
HAMMER
Piston
57
DOUBLE ACTING HAMMER
The double acting hammer employs steam or air for lifting
the ram and for accelerating the downward stroke.
The weight of the hammer is only 500 kg (5 kN) but because of accelerating
effect of steam (or air) pressure, it has an effect of a weight of 3 tonnes (30. kN).
It operates with succession of rapid blows, the number varying from 100 to 200
blows per minute.
For light hammers, the number of blows may be even as high as 300 per
minute.
The pile driving is very quick.
These hammers are very useful for driving piles under water.
59
DIESEL HAMMER
60
fs = άc
qp =1.2 C Nc = 9c
(as piles are long , accounting for the depth Nc =7.5)
ά – adhesion factor or shear mobilization factor
c – cohesion
FOR PILES IN SAND
246
RETAINING WALLS
Structures that are built to retain vertical or nearly vertical earth banks
or any other material are called retaining walls. Retaining walls may be
constructed of masonry or sheet piles.
Gravity walls resist movement because of their heavy sections. They are
built of mass concrete or stone or brick masonry.
In all these cases, the backfill tries to move the wall from its position.
The movement of the wall is partly resisted by the wall itself and partly
by soil in front of the wall.
247
248
VARIOUS TYPES OF RETAINING WALLS
249
Earth pressure
A soil mass retained by a wall exerts a pressure on the wall.
This pressure P is called ‘earth pressure’. The magnitude of
this earth pressure depends on the movement of the wall.
Earth pressure at rest-
When there is no movement of wall, the soil is in a state of
rest, ie., there is no strain in the soil. The pressure
corresponding to zero lateral strain is called ‘earth pressure
at rest’ and is given by,
p0 = k0 pv
Where, po – earth pressure at rest at depth ‘z’ below G L
252
Passive earth pressure
When a wall moves towards the back fill, the earth
pressure increases. Beyond certain movement, it reaches a
maximum and is known as ‘passive earth pressure’.
Ex: Anchored sheet pile walls ; Anchors are subjected to
passive pressure.
Passive earth pressure is given by,
pp = kp * pv
Where, pp – passive earth pressure
kp – coefficient of passive earth pressure
253
254
255
The coefficients, k0, ka , kp are obtained as:
k0 = 1- sin ø or μ/ (1- μ)
ka = (1-sin ø) / (1+ sin ø)
kp =( 1+ sin ø)/( 1- sin ø)
Where ø – angle of shearing resistance
States of plastic equilibrium:
A soil mass is in a state of plastic equilibrium if every part of
it is at the verge of failure
This is illustrated with the help of Mohr’s stress diagram
I – Earth pressure at rest condition
II – Active earth pressure condition - Active state of plastic
equilibrium
III – Passive earth pressure condition - Passive state of plastic
equilibrium
Rankine’s Earth Pressure Theory
Assumptions:
The soil mass is a semi – infinite, homogeneous ,dry cohesion
less soil
The ground surface is plane and horizontal
261
ASSUMPTIONS :
1. The soil is isotropic and homogeneous
2. The rupture surface is a plane surface
3. The failure wedge is a rigid body
4. The pressure surface is a plane surface
5. There is wall friction on the pressure surface
6. Failure is two-dimensional and
7. The soil is cohesionless
262
COULOMB'S -ACTIVE STATE-COHESIONLESS
263
COULOMB'S - ACTIVE STATE
In Fig AB is the pressure face
The backfill surface BE is a plane inclined at an angle ß with
the horizontal
α is the angle made by the pressure face AB with the
horizontal
H is the height of the wall
AC is the assumed rupture plane surface, and
θ is the angle made by the surface AC with the horizontal
The weight of the wedge W length of the wall may be written
as
W = γA, where A = area of wedge ABC
264
As the pressure face AB moves away from the backfill, there will
be sliding of the soil mass along the wall from B towards A.
The sliding of the soil mass is resisted by the friction of the
surface.
The direction of the shear stress is in the direction from A
towards B.
lf Pn is the total normal reaction of the soil pressure acting on face
AB,
The resultant of Pn and the shearing stress is the active pressure
Pa making an angle δ with the normal.
Since the shearing stress acts upwards, the resulting Pa dips
below the normal.
The angle δ for this condition is considered positive.
265
As the wedge ABC ruptures along plane AC, it slides along
this plane.
This is resisted by the frictional force acting between the soil
at rest below AC, and the sliding wedge.
The resisting shearing stress is acting in the direction from A
towards C.
If Wn is the normal component of the weight of wedge W on
plane AC, the resultant of the normal Wn and the shearing
stress is the reaction R.
This makes an angle ϕ with the normal since the rupture
takes place within the soil itself.
266
CULMANN'S METHOD
The active earth pressure based on Coulomb’s earth pressure theory can be
obtained using Culman’s graphical procedure
Draw the wall to a chosen scale and the surface of the back fill
Compute the weight of sliding wedges, BAC1, BAC2, etc and mark the
same as 1, 2, 3 etc choosing an appropriate weight scale (ie.eg 1 cm =
10kN) 267
Draw lines parallel to AD from 1, 2, 3 etc to cut AC1, AC2, AC3 etc at E1,
E2, etc
Join E1, E2, E3 etc by a smooth curve. This is called Culman’s curve
Draw a tangent to the Culman’s curve parallel to AF. Let it touch the
curve at E
Draw a line parallel to AD from E to obtain EP
The length EP multiplied by the weight scale gives the active earth
thrust.
CULMANN'S METHOD- GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION
269
ACTIVE PRESSURE BY CULMANN'S METHOD FOR
COHESIONLESS SOILS
Culmann's (1866) method is the same as the trial wedge method. In Culmann's
method, the force polygons are constructed directly on the ϕ-line AE taking
AE as the load line.
The procedure is as follows:
1. Draw ϕ -line AE at an angle ϕ to the horizontal.
2. Lay off on AE distances, AV, A1, A2, A3, etc.
to a suitable scale to represent the weight of wedges ABV, A51, AS2, AS3,
etc. respectively.
3. Draw lines parallel to AD from points V, 1, 2, 3 to intersect assumed rupture
lines AV, Al,A2, A3 at points V", I',2', 3', etc. respectively. 270
4. Join points V, 1', 2' 3' etc. by a smooth curve which is the pressure
locus.
5. Select point C‘ on the pressure locus such that the tangent to the
curve at this point is parallel to the ϕ-line AE.
6. Draw C'C parallel to the pressure line AD. The magnitude of C'C
in its natural units gives the active pressure Pa.
7. Join AC" and produce to meet the surface of the backfill at C. AC
is the rupture line. For the plane backfill surface, the point of
application of Pa is at a height of H/3 from the base of the wall.
271
STABILITY OF RETAINING WALLS
272