Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe For Sewers and Other Gravity-Flow Applications
Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe For Sewers and Other Gravity-Flow Applications
Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe For Sewers and Other Gravity-Flow Applications
Designation: D 2321 – 08
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE 2—The following ASTM standards may be found useful in
connection with this practice: Practice D 420, Test Method D 1556, Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)
Method D 2216, Specification D 2235, Test Method D 2412, Specification D 2488 Practice for Description and Identification of Soils
D 2564, Practice D 2657, Practice D 2855, Test Methods D 2922, Test (Visual-Manual Procedure)
Method D 3017, Practice F 402, Specification F 477, Specification F 545, D 2564 Specification for Solvent Cements for Poly(Vinyl
and Specification F 913. Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Piping Systems
NOTE 3—Most Plumbing Codes and some Building Codes have provi- D 2657 Practice for Heat Fusion Joining of Polyolefin Pipe
sions for the installation of underground “building drains and building
sewers.” See them for plumbing piping applications.
and Fittings
D 2855 Practice for Making Solvent-Cemented Joints with
1.3 Units—The values stated in inch-pound units are to be Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Pipe and Fittings
regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are D 2922 Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-
mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)3
information only and are not considered standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F17 on Plastic Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
Piping Systems and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F17.62 on Sewer. the ASTM website.
3
Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2008. Published January 2009. Originally Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced
approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as D 2321 – 05. on www.astm.org.
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
location in the trench. Soil Classes I to IV should be used as density. Properly placed and compacted, Class IV materials can
recommended in Table 3. Soil Class V, including clays and silts provide reasonable levels of pipe support; however, these
with liquid limits greater than 50, organic soils, and frozen materials may not be suitable under high fills, surface-applied
soils, shall be excluded from the pipe-zone embedment. wheel loads, or under high-energy-level vibratory compactors
5.2.1 Class I— Class I materials provide maximum stability and tampers. Do not use where water conditions in the trench
and pipe support for a given percent compaction due to the low may prevent proper placement and compaction.
content of sand and fines. With minimum effort these materials
can be installed at relatively high-soil stiffnesses over a wide NOTE 6—The term “high energy level vibratory compactors and
range of moisture contents. In addition, the high permeability tampers” refers to compaction equipment that might deflect or distort the
pipe more than permitted by the specifications or the manufacturer.
of Class I materials may aid in the control of water, and these
materials are often desirable for embedment in rock cuts where 5.2.5 Class V—Class V materials should be excluded from
water is frequently encountered. However, when ground-water
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
pipe-zone embedment.
flow is anticipated, consideration should be given to the 5.3 Moisture Content of Embedment Materials—The mois-
potential for migration of fines from adjacent materials into the ture content of embedment materials must be controlled to
open-graded Class I materials. (See X1.8.)
permit placement and compaction to required levels. For soils
5.2.2 Class II—Class II materials, when compacted, pro-
with low permeability (that is, Class III and Class IV and some
vide a relatively high level of pipe support; however, open-
borderline Class II soils), moisture content is normally con-
graded groups may allow migration and the sizes should be
trolled to 6 3 % of optimum (see Test Method D 698). The
checked for compatibility with adjacent material. (See X1.8.)
5.2.3 Class III— Class III materials provide less support for practicality of obtaining and maintaining the required limits on
a given density than Class I or Class II materials. Higher levels moisture content is an important criterion for selecting mate-
of compactive effort are required and moisture content must be rials, since failure to achieve required density, especially in the
near optimum to minimize compactive effort and achieve the pipe zone embedment, may result in excessive deflection.
required density. These materials provide reasonable levels of 5.4 Maximum Particle Size—Maximum particle size for
pipe support once proper density is achieved. embedment is limited to material passing a 11⁄2-in. (37.5-mm)
5.2.4 Class IV—Class IV materials require a geotechnical sieve (see Table 2). To enhance placement around small
evaluation prior to use. Moisture content must be near opti- diameter pipe and to prevent damage to the pipe wall, a smaller
mum to minimize compactive effort and achieve the required maximum size may be required (see X1.9). When final backfill
Foundation Suitable as foundation and for Suitable as foundation Suitable for replacing over-excavated Not suitable.
replacing over-excavated and for replacing trench bottom as restricted above.
and unstable trench over-excavated and Install and compact in
bottom as restricted unstable trench bottom 6 in. (150 mm) maximum
above. as restricted above. layers
Install and compact
in 12 in. (300 mm)
maximum layers
Pipe Zone Suitable as restricted Suitable as restricted above. Work Suitable as restricted above. Suitable as restricted above.
Embedment above. Work material material under pipe to provide Difficult to place and Difficult to place and
under pipe to provide uniform haunch support. compact in the haunch zone. compact in the
uniform haunch support. haunch zone.
D
Embedment 85 % 90 % 95 %
Compaction:
Min Recommended
Density, SPDC
Required Moisture none none Maintain near optimum Maintain near optimum
Control to minimize compactive effort to minimize compactive effort
A
Class V materials are unsuitable as embedment. They may be used as final backfill as permitted by the engineer.
B
Class I materials have higher stiffness than Class II materials, but data on specific soil stiffness of placed, uncompacted Class I materials can be taken equivalent to
Class II materials compacted to 95% of maximum standard Proctor density (SPD95), and the soil stiffness of compacted Class I materials can be taken equivalent to Class
II materials compacted to 100% of maximum standard Proctor density (SPD100). Even if placed uncompacted (that is, dumped), Class I materials should always be worked
into the haunch zone to assure complete placement.
C
SPD is standard Proctor density as determined by Test Method D 698.
D
Minimum density typically achieved by dumped placement (that is, uncompacted but worked into haunch zone to ensure complete placement).
contains rocks, cobbles, etc., the engineer may require greater materials. Maintain water level below pipe bedding and foun-
initial backfill cover levels (see Fig. 1). dation to provide a stable trench bottom. Use, as appropriate,
sump pumps, well points, deep wells, geofabrics, perforated
6. Trench Excavation
underdrains, or stone blankets of sufficient thickness to remove
6.1 General—Procedures for trench excavation that are and control water in the trench. When excavating while
especially important in flexible thermoplastic pipe installations depressing ground water, ensure the ground water is below the
are given herein. bottom of cut at all times to prevent washout from behind
6.1.1 Excavation—Excavate trenches to ensure that sides
sheeting or sloughing of exposed trench walls. Maintain
will be stable under all working conditions. Slope trench walls
control of water in the trench before, during, and after pipe
or provide supports in conformance with all local and national
installation, and until embedment is installed and sufficient
standards for safety. Open only as much trench as can be safely
maintained by available equipment. Backfill all trenches as backfill has been placed to prevent flotation of the pipe. To
soon as practicable, but not later than the end of each working preclude loss of soil support, employ dewatering methods that
day. minimize removal of fines and the creation of voids in in-situ
6.2 Water Control—Do not lay or embed pipe in standing or materials.
running water. At all times prevent runoff and surface water 6.2.2 Running Water—Control running water emanating
from entering the trench. from drainage of surface or ground water to preclude under-
6.2.1 Ground Water—When groundwater is present in the mining of the trench bottom or walls, the foundation, or other
work area, dewater to maintain stability of in-situ and imported zones of embedment. Provide dams, cutoffs or other barriers
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
7.5.1 Minimum Density—The minimum embedment den- ments with respect to pipe installation, including trench depth,
sity should be established by the engineer based on an grade, water conditions, foundation, embedment and backfill
evaluation of specific project conditions. Higher or lower materials, joints, density of materials in place, and safety,
densities than those recommended in Table 3 may be appro- should be monitored by the engineer at a frequency appropriate
priate (see X1.6.2). In the absence of an engineering evalua- to project requirements. Leakage testing specifications, while
tion, the minimum densities given in Table 3 are intended to not within the scope of this practice, should be made part of the
provide satisfactory embedment stiffness in most installation specifications for plastic pipe installations, when applicable.
APPENDIXES
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1. COMMENTARY
X1.1 Those concerned with the service performance of a extent of compaction of the embedment materials, type of
buried flexible pipe should understand factors that can affect embedment, water conditions in the trench, pipe stiffness,
this performance. Accordingly, key considerations in the de- uniformity of embedment support, pipe out-of-roundness, and
sign and execution of a satisfactory installation of buried installation workmanship in general. These deflections may
flexible thermoplastic pipe that provided a basis for the exceed the subsequent load-induced deflections. Compaction
development of this practice are given in this Appendix. of the side fill may result in negative vertical deflections (that
is, increases in pipe vertical diameter and decreases in hori-
X1.2 General—Sub-surface conditions should be ad- zontal diameter). Approaches given in Practice D 3839 provide
equately investigated prior to construction, in accordance with allowances for construction deflection.
Practice D 420, as a basis for establishing requirements for X1.4.2 Load-Induced Deflection
foundation, embedment and backfill materials and construction Load-induced deflections result from backfill loads and other
methods. The type of pipe selected should be suited for the job superimposed loads that are applied after the pipe is embedded.
conditions. Traditionally, typical soil-structure interaction equations such
as the “Iowa Formula’’, attributed to Spangler, or other
X1.3 Load/Deflection Performance—The thermoplastic methods have been used to calculate deflections resulting from
pipes considered in this practice are classified as flexible these loads.
conduits since in carrying load they deform (deflect) to develop X1.4.3 Initial Deflection
support from the surrounding embedment. This interaction of Initial deflection is the deflection in the installed and
pipe and soil provides a pipe-soil structure capable of support- backfilled pipe. It is the total of construction deflections and
ing earth fills and surface live loads of considerable magnitude. load-induced deflections.
The design, specification and construction of the buried flex- X1.4.4 Time Dependent Factors
ible pipe system should recognize that embedment materials Time dependent factors include changes in soil stiffness in
must be selected, placed and compacted so that pipe and soil the pipe embedment zone and native trench soils, as well as
act in concert to carry the applied loads without excessive loading changes due to trench settlement over time. These
strains from deflections or localized pipe wall distortions. changes typically add to initial deflections; the time involved
varies from a few days to several years depending on soil
X1.4 Pipe Deflection—Pipe deflection is the diametral types, their placement, and initial compaction. Time dependent
change in the pipe-soil system resulting from the process of factors are traditionally accounted for by adjusting load-
installing the pipe (construction deflection), static and live induced deflections by a deflection lag factor. The deflection
loads applied to the pipe (load-induced deflection), and time lag factor is the ratio of final load-induced deflection to initial
dependent soil response (deflection lag). Construction and load load-induced deflection. Selection of a deflection lag factor is
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
induced deflections together constitute initial pipe deflection. considered in design guides for buried flexible pipe.
Additional time dependent deflections are attributed primarily X1.4.5 Final Deflection
to changes in embedment and in-situ soils, and trench settle- Final deflection is the total long term deflection of the pipe.
ment. The sum of initial and time dependent deflections It consists of initial deflection adjusted for time dependent
constitutes total deflection. factors.
X1.4.1 Construction Deflection
Construction deflections are induced during the process of X1.5 Deflection Criteria—Deflection criteria are often set
installing and embedding flexible pipe, even before significant as limits for the design and acceptance of buried flexible pipe
earth and surface loads are applied. The magnitude of con- installation. Deflection limits for specific pipe systems may be
struction deflections depends on such factors as the method and derived from both structural and practical considerations.
Embedment density requirements should be determined by X1.8.1.1 D15 / d85< 5 where D15 is the sieve opening size
the engineer based on deflection limits established for the pipe, passing 15 % by weight of the coarser material and d85 is the
pipe stiffness, and installation quality control, as well as the sieve opening size passing 85 % by weight of the finer
characteristics of the in-situ soil and compactibility character- material.
istics of the embedment materials used. The minimum densi- X1.8.1.2 D 50/d50< 25 where D 50 is the sieve opening size
ties given in Table 3 are based on attaining an average modulus passing 50 % by weight of the coarser material and d50 is the
of soil reaction (E8) of 1000 psi5, which relates soil stiffness to sieve opening size passing 50 % by weight of the finer
soil type and degree of compaction. For particular installations, material. This criterion need not apply if the coarser material is
the project engineer should verify that the density specified well-graded (see Test Method D 2487).
meets performance requirements. X1.8.1.3 If the finer material is a medium to highly plastic
clay without sand or silt partings (CL or CH), then the
X1.7 Compaction Methods—Achieving desired densities following criterion may be used in lieu of X1.8.1.1: D15< 0.02
for specific types of materials depends on the methods used to in. (0.5 mm) where D15 is the sieve opening size passing 15 %
impart compactive energy. Coarse-grained, clean materials by weight of the coarser material.
such as crushed stone, gravels, and sand are more readily NOTE X1.3—Materials selected for use based on filter gradation crite-
compacted using vibratory equipment, whereas fine materials ria, such as in X1.8.1, should be handled and placed in a manner that will
with high plasticity require kneading and impact force along minimize segregation.
with controlled water content to achieve acceptable densities
(see 5.3). In pipe trenches, small, hand-held or walk-behind X1.9 Maximum Particle Size—Limiting particle size to 3⁄4
compactors are required, not only to preclude damage to the in. (20 mm) or less enhances placement of embedment material
pipe, but to ensure thorough compaction in the confined areas for nominal pipe sizes 8 in. (200 mm) through 15 in. (380 mm).
around the pipe and along the trench wall. As examples, For smaller pipe, a particle size of about 10 % of the nominal
pipe diameter is recommended.
5
Howard, Amster, “Modulus of Soil Reaction Values for Buried Flexible Pipe,” X1.10 Embedment Width for Adequate Support—In cer-
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT1, 1977. tain conditions, a minimum width of embedment material is
FIG. X1.2 Minimum Embedment Width When Native Soil Can Not Sustain a Vertical Cut or When Installed in the Embankment Condition
X2.1 This practice may be incorporated, by referral, into X2.8 Section 7.5—Specific restrictions on methods of
contract documents for a specific project to cover requirements compaction.
for installation of flexible thermoplastic pipe in sewers and
other gravity-flow applications. Application to a particular X2.9 Section 7.5.1 and Table 3 —Minimum embedment
project should be made by means of a list of supplemental density if different from these recommendations; specific
requirements. Suggested modifications to specific sections are density requirements for backfill (for example, for pavement
listed below (the list is keyed to applicable section numbers of subgrade).
this practice):
X2.10 Section 7.6—Minimum cover requirements if dif-
X2.2 Sections 5.1, 5.2, and Table 3 —Further restrictions ferent from this paragraph.
on use of Classes of embedment and backfill materials.
X2.11 Section 7.7—Detailed requirements for support of
X2.3 Section 5—Specific gradations of embedment mate- vertical risers, standpipes, and stacks to accommodate antici-
rials for resistance to migration. pated relative movements between pipe and such appurte-
nances. Detailing to accommodate thermal movements, par-
X2.4 Section 5.5—Maximum particle size, if different
ticularly at risers.
from Table 2.
X2.5 Section 6.2—Restrictions on mode of dewatering; X2.12 Section 7.10—Detailed requirements for manhole
design of underdrains. connections.
X2.6 Section 6.3—Requirements on minimum trench X2.13 Section 7.11—Requirements on methods of testing
width. compaction and leakage.
X2.7 Section 6.4—Restrictions or details for support of X2.14 Section X1.13—Requirements on deflection and
trench walls. deflection measurements, including method and time of testing.
Committee F17 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue (D 2321–05)
that may impact the use of this standard.
(1) Section 5 – Revised sections on soil classification, instal- tion, Embedment and Backfill with new Table 3 – Recommen-
lation and use, and moisture content of embedment materials. dations for Installation and Use of Soils and Aggregates for
(2) Section 7– Changed references to tables. Foundation and Pipe-Zone Embedment.
(3) Section 9 – Added section for Keywords. (7) Appendix X1 and Appendix X2 – Changed references to
(4) Table 1– Added new Table 1 - Soil Classification Chart tables.
(5) Table 2– Replaced existing Table 1 – Classes of Embed- (8) X1.4.4– Replaced reference to Practice D 3839 with
ment and Backfill Materials with new Table 2 – Soil Classes. reference to design guides for buried flexible pipe.
(6) Table 3 – Replaced existing Table 2 – Recommendations (9) X1.6.2– Replaced reference to Practice D 3839 for E’
for Installation and Use of Soils and Aggregates for Founda- values with reference to Howard, 1977.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
--```,,,,,`,,``,`,````,,,,,`,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---