1 2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases 2021
1 2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases 2021
1 2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases 2021
György Vereb
Experimental data included from the work of the following PhD students:
Vereb 2013
The 3 categories of cell surface receptors
EGF receptor on
A431 cells
Vereb 2013
Basics of RTK activation
- the central dogma: ligand binding and dimerization
Transmembrane
helix
Kinase
Cytoplasmic cata-
Phospho-
domain lytic
tyrosines
site
Vereb 2013
Vereb 2013
Concept of domains
• 1911. P. Rous: cell-free filtrate from chicken with
sarcoma conferred the tumor to healthy chicken
• Rous sarcoma virus - 1976: src gene (SaRComa)
• Codes a small (p60) cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase
Phospho-
tyrosines
Active
Ras
GTP
Sos SH3
GRB2
Signalling
Vereb 2013
Ras, together with Gsa, and belongs to the GTP-ase superfamily
of intracellular switch proteins
Dissociation of GDP is
promoted by guanine Cycling of Ras
nucleotide exchange Ras-GTP is formed
factors (GEF), such as Sos spontaneously
in GTP-bound, “on”
Mutants of Ras, state, Ras binds and
GEF and GAP activates effector
proteins that control
are important in
function / growth of
tumor cells
Pathogenesis
1. Activated Ras
Raf (serine/threonin kinase)
MAPKK
3. Activated MEK
MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase, Ser/Thr)
4. Further kinases, transcription factors
(TCF, SRF) are serine / threonine phosphorylated
MEK 5. Activated transcription factor(s) bind to
DNA
2. Activated Raf 6. Gene transcription
MEK (serine/threonine
and tyrosine kinase)
Vereb 2013
RTK signalling: summary of main concepts
1a. Receptor dimers, ligand binding
1b. Autophosphorylation (= transphosphorylation)
2. Protein domains specialised for recognition
SH2: src homology domain 2
PTB: phosphotyrosine binding domain
recognition of P-tyrosines
SH3: src homology domain 3
recognition of proline rich regions
PH: Pleckstrin homology domain
phosphoinositide binding
SH1: the tyrosine kinase domain itself
3. Activation of further enzymes
3a. enzyme activated through adapter proteins (SH2 and SH3)
3b. enzyme binds directly to receptor (SH2 domain)
4. Signalling cascade leading to the nucleus
Vereb 2013
Enzymes containing SH2 domain
Vereb 2013
The insulin receptor
- changes in metabolism, proliferation, and survival
PTB PH
insulin
Insulin receptor PIP2 PIP3 Glut4
PDK2
PDK1
P PI3K
Akt
IRS-1
P P
P
PKCζ
glucose
GAP
uptake
mTOR GSK3
p70 S6K Rab
PP1 Glycogen
S6 synthase
insulin
Insulin receptor PIP2 PIP3 Glut4
PDK2
PDK1
P PI3K
Akt
ras SHC
IRS-1
raf P P
P
MEK PKCζ
glucose
Erk
GAP
uptake
mTOR GSK3
p70 S6K Rab
RSK
PP1 Glycogen
proliferation
S6 synthase
Cytoplasm
Protein
Phospho- kinase C Phospho-
G protein lipase Cß lipase Cγ
IP3 activated
•Ion channels receptor
IP3 receptor •Myosin LC tyrosine kinase
(Ca2+ channel)
•Glycogen synthase
SER •Ik-B
•EGFR (- feedback) Cellular response
Ca2+
Activation of
Calmodulin
dependent
enzymes
Vereb 2013
Calcium signal evoked by the PDGF receptor
high [Ca2+]i
0.5 IP3R
2+
Calcium (mM)
Ca
0.3
low [Ca2+]i
0.1
0 400 800
time (s) Vereb 2013
Signal pathways of PDGFR
PDGF receptor
membrane
Tyr716 SHC-Grb2-SOS
Grb2-SOS
PLCγ Ras
IP3 ,DAG Raf
PI3K
Ca2+ Src GAP MAPKK /MEK
PKC Stat, family MAPK, ERK, JNKK
Jak
Rho, Akt / JNK
Rac PKB
Platelet derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR) are receptor tyrosine kinases that play an
important role in proliferation and survival of tumor cells.
Vereb 2013
Confluence dependent expression of PDGFR-β
Receptor density inside
0,8 250
A172 Confluent
control PDGF-BB Sparse
Cell number
200
raft + SEM
0,4
100
0,2 50
0
0 10 100 1000 10000
Sparse Confluent
1,25-2x104/cm2 1-1,5x105/cm2 Fluorescence intensity
0.45
A172
0.4
(ratio + SEM)
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
Expression and cell surface localization of 0.1
type beta PDGF receptors varies with 0.05
ligand stimulation and cell culture 0
confluence. Sparse Confluent
1,25-2x104/cm2 1-1,5x105/cm2Vereb 2013
What are lipid rafts?
A172
T98G
Lipid rafts
PDGFR clusters Overlay FITC - CTX B
Vereb 2013
Activation by PDGF and raft localization
Quantitative evaluation of overlap: cross-correlation
C ( x x )( y y )
i j i, j i, j
Identical: C=1
(x x ) ( y y)
i j i, j
2
i j i, j
2
Independent: C=0
Inverse: C= -1
PDGF 0.6
0.5
C + SEM
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
PDGF + MBCD sparse confluent
Vereb 2013
Quantitative measurement of raft dependent PDGFR
activation
PDGFR β
GM1
P-PDGFR b
Tyr716 MAPK + (Grb2)
Tyr771 MAPK - (RasGAP)
Tyr751 PI3K
Tyr1021 PLC γ control PDGF MBCD+PDGF
Stimulation and raft dependent activation of PDGFRβ
P-PDGFR β
PPDGFR
PDGFR
Inside raft
PPDGFR
PDGFR
Outside raft
PDGFR β
Schematic pathway of quantitative
GM1 image processing
Vereb 2013
Raft and confluence dependent activation of Tyr 716 and 771
residues
PDGF-BB
PDGF-BB
Tyr716 Tyr771
SPARSE CONFLUENT SPARSE CONFLUENT
MAPK+ MAPK-
Grb2 RasGAP
1,8 2,5
(PPDGFR / PDGFR)Outside raft
(PPDGFR / PDGFR) Inside raft
confluent sparse
PDGF-BB
20 ng/ml 0’ 0,5’ 2’ 5’ 0’ 0,5’ 2’ 5’
pP38
pP42
Actin
Actin normalized pP38 MAPK Actin normalized pP42 MAPK
7 7
sparse confluent sparse confluent
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
control 0,5' PDGF- 2' PDGF-BB 5' PDGF-BB control 0,5' PDGF- 2' PDGF-BB 5' PDGF-BB
BB BB
Coherent with the microscopic results, pMAPK dependent proliferation is more activated in
dispersed cells after 20ng/ml PDGF-BB ligand stimulation.
Vereb 2013
MAPK mediated cell proliferation depends on cell confluence
SPARSE CONFLUENT
UNSTIMULATED 2h PDGF-BB UNSTIMULATED 2h PDGF-BB
PRPPIDIUM IODIDE
Ki-67
Vereb 2013
Raft and confluence dependent activation of Tyr 751 residues
1,5
PDGF-BB
Tyr751 1
SPARSE CONFLUENT
PI3K
0,5
0
control PDGF-BB
confluent sparse
Actin normalized pAkt
4
PDGF-BB sparse confluent
20 ng/ml 0 0,5 2 5 0 0,5 2 5 3,5
’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ 3
pAkt 2,5
2
Actin 1,5
1
PDGF-BB stimulation significantly increased
0,5
relative receptor phosphorylation of specific Tyr 751
0
residues and activation of Akt which could facilitate control 0,5' PDGF- 2' PDGF-BB 5' PDGF-BB
cell survival in both sparse and confluent cultures. BB Vereb 2013
Raft and confluence dependent activation of Tyr 1021 residues
PDGF-BB
1,5
Tyr1021
SPARSE CONFLUENT 1
PLC γ
0,5
0
control PDGF-BB
confluent sparse Actin normalized pRHOa
4,5
PDGF-BB sparse confluent
4
20 ng/ml 0 0,5 2 5 0 0,5 2 5
3,5
’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ ’
3
pRhoA
2,5
Actin 2
1,5
Tyrosine 1021 residues were significantly
1
hyperphosphorylated following ligand stimulation
0,5
and PKC-dependent RhoA phosphorylation was
0
activated in confluent cultures. control 0,5' PDGF-BB 2' PDGF-BB 5' PDGF-BB
Vereb 2013
PKC mediated cell migration depends on cell confluence
SPARSE CONFLUENT
2 2
Ca2+ (F340/F380)
Ca2+ (F340/F380)
1.5 1.5
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 200 400 600 0 100 200 300 400
pRhoA cortactin
PDGF-BB
PDGF-BB
SPARSE CONFLUENT SPARSE CONFLUENT
Vereb 2013
Redistribution of PTPases
PTPN4
Raft (GM1)
control PDGF + vanadate
0,3
SHP2 PTPN4
C + SEM
0,25
0,2
0,15
0,1
0,05
0
control PDGF+Vanadate PDGF Vanadate Vereb 2013
Conclusions
Confluent Sparse Significance
Excess 7p
Survival Rate
0.1
0.01
NCI
NCI+7 c5
NCI+7 c9
NCI+7 c55
0.001
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Vereb 2013
In addition to EGFR, integrin b1 expression
is also elevated
600000
EGFR
Integrin b1
500000
Receptor Number ± SEM
400000
300000
200000
100000
excess 7p
Vereb 2013
Interaction of EGFR and Integrins
Dimerization/aggregation
Integrin
Integrin
P PIP3
P PIP3 Ak
P P ILK
t
P
FAK
TyrK
P TyrK P PI-3K
P P
Vereb 2013
Creating glioblastoma clones with excess
EGFR
E1H / High E1H / Low
Receptor number ± SEM (x103)
1000 EGFR
1 Integrin 100
90
800 80
70
60
600
50
40
400 30
20
10
200
0
Beta 1 integrin
2.0 U251
per field
1.0
Colonies
400
0.5 200
0.0 0
0 2 4 6 8 U251 E1L E1H
1
Radiation resistance
Correlation
• Higher EGFR
Túlélő hányad (± SEM)
0.1
ability
± SEM
• Higher integrin β1
0.01
greater survival ability
Can the molecular
interactions in the background
0.001
0 2 4 6 8 be verified?
Irradiation dose (Gy) Vereb 2013
EGFR homoassociation and EGFR - b1-integrin
heteroassociation on EGFR transfected U251
clones
EGFR homoassociation
14.0
EGFR - integrin ß1 heteroassociation
12.0
FRET % ± SEM
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
U251 U251 E1L U251 E1H/L U251 E1H/H
Vereb 2013
EGFR homoassociation and EGFR-intgerin heteroassociation
are complementary at the microscopic pixel level as well
EGFR-EGFR EGFR-Integrin β1
homoassociation heteroassociation
EGFR-EGFR homoassociation
E1H / Low
E1H / High
EGFR-Integrin β1
heteroassociation
Vereb 2013
Akt phosphorylation upon EGF stimulus
In vitro model:
Excess EGFR induces excess integrin β1 expression
which in turn shifts signaling emphasis to integrin-EGFR
association,
with a consequential increase of EGF induced Akt
phosphorylation
(± SEM)
TyrK
TyrK
1.5
P P PI-3K
P P
1.0
Clinical consequence?
Vereb 2013
EGFR and b1-integrin expression levels
on frozen intraoperative astrocytoma samples
Vereb 2013
EGFR - integrin b1 heteroassociation
in frozen intraoperative astrocytoma samples
Astrocytoma, Grade
II
(sample TC515)
Astrocytoma, Grade
IV
(sample T82)
Vereb 2013
EGFR - integrin b1 heteroassociation
on frozen intraoperative astrocytoma samples
12.0
II.
Mean FRET efficiency ± SEM (%)
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
15
16
97
26
93
B
5*
6*
3
2
0'
T3
T3
T5
T3
T5
T6
T6
T7
T7
T8
6/
0/
T8
T7
T7
T8
T1
TC
TC
TC
TC
TC
Intraoperative Tumor Samples
• Increased EGFR integrin interaction (FRET%) means worse
prognosis (single determinant in stepwise logistic regression)
• Extent of interaction is also predictive within groups
Vereb 2013
Survival - grade Survival - EGFR
Vereb 2013
CONCLUSION
Functional relationship between EGFR and integrin β1 may play an important
role in tumor progression and in the development of radioresistance via the
survival-promoting PI3K/Akt pathway
Vereb 2013