Supplier Quality

Process Control Plan Audit Summary Sheet Date: GM 1927 16

Supplier Name: Supplier Phone:

Mfg. DUNS: Plant Location & Country:

Auditor: (SQE) Auditor Phone:

Auditor: E-Mail: GM Division:

Part Number (s): Part Name:

Drawing Date: ECR#: Eng. Change Level:

PPAP Status: Model Year: Program:

Creativity Team: Commodity:

Reason For Audit: Future Launch Current Partial Other Safety Related Part ? Yes No N/A
Type of Audit: Follow RunatRate (GM 1927 Product Validation Complete:
Initial Yes No N/A
Up 35 Attachment B)
Driver of Audit: APQP Mgmt. Plant Run @ CPIP/
Confirmation Request
Critical Request Rate Disruption Shutdown/Start
Warranty Up
Risk Supplier
Component CSL-1 CSL-2 Major
Fastener D/PFMEA DD&W Audit
Other
Check Plan
Focus of Audit: Part / (D02)
Operation / Complete Mfg. Quality System - Ongoing
Line /Cell
Assembly Machine System Documentation
Technical Information Availability
NR 1. Actual Drawing NR 2. Approved Drawing NR 3. Print Complete
NR 4. Technical Regulations NR 5. DFMEA to PFMEA
0 Total Potential 0 => NR

Quality System Documentation

NR 6. Process Flow Diagram (PFD) NR 9. PFMEA Available NR 10. PFMEA Acceptable
NR 12. Evidence PFMEA Up to Date NR 15. Process Control Plan (PCP) Available NR 18. PCP address all print requirements
NR 19. PCP Acceptable NR 20. Current Controls PFMEA and PCP NR 21. RPN reduction plan
NR 22. Sample Sizes and Frequency NR 24. Severity level 8+ from tiered supplier NR 25. Continuous Improvement Procedure/Process
0 Total Potential 0 => NR

Quality System related to Control Plan Implementation

NR 27. Approved Material List NR 28. Assembly/component requirements NR 29. Operators Trained
NR 30. Operators Understand Instructions NR 31. Rework and Recovery NR 32. Master Parts for Error Proofing
NR 33. Parts have Traceability NR 34. Testing Verification NR 35. Part Characteristics DFMEA/PFMEA
NR 36. Pre-Launch CP and EPC
0 Total Potential 0 => NR

Quality System Implementation by Management

NR 37. Implementation Responsibility NR 38. Data Collection for CI NR 39. Action Plans Followed
NR 40. Communication NR 41. non conformities/SPPS/Changes updates NR 42. Process Parameters
NR 43. Check Sample size and Frecuencies NR 44. Management CP implementation
0 Total Potential 0 => NR

Pts Element Scoring

NR 0 Technical Information Availability GREEN 0 Element is not in place and no evidence of plans to implement

NR 0 Quality System Documentation GREEN 1 Element is not in place but a plan to implement is documented

NR 0 Quality System related to Control Plan Implementation GREEN 2 Element is in place but it is not being followed

NR 0 Quality System Implementation by Management GREEN 3 Element in place but not followed at each job or all the time

0 Overall GREEN 4 Element is in place and it is being followed

NR
Summary Scoring: Green ≥ 90% Yellow 70-89% Red <69%

Approved Approved, but need Documentation Not Approved Follow-Up Audit Date:
In case of deviations use Supplier Action Plan Form tab.
If SQE considers to deep dive more the quality system and production floor use or refrence to GM 1927 72 Shop Floor Audit.

Supplier Representative Name with Signature GM Representative Name with Signature

GM Confidential 07/13/2023 Page 1

Process Control Plan Audit Worksheet Printed 07/13/2023
A. Technical Information Availability AUDIT WORKSHEET
EVIDENCE/ G
REQUIREMENT / STANDARD:
DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Score Y OBSERVATIONS
In regard to Technical Information Availability
REQUIRED R

If the supplier is design responsible:

The actual Supplier GD&T / drawings should be available at production
facility with the latest change level.
Are the most updated GD&T / drawings availble at the
The GM drawings should be at supplier facility with the latest change
Drawings / GD&T production facility?
level.
1
Supplier's Math data available.
Design Records Look for Design records NR ###
Math Data Look for Math data
If GM is design responsible:
The GM GD&T / drawings should be at supplier facility with the latest
change level.
GM Math data available.
G
Look for the part number on the GM drawing and confirm it is
The supplier has the final customer/DRE approved GM drawing. GM approved drawings
2
Latest ECR
the same with the latest ECR (Engineering Change Request) NR ###
G

Verify GD&T / drawing has all information including the Safety

The GD&T/drawings should be complete with all the required information Characteristics on the drawing
Completed GD&T / Drawings
3 (Tolerances, Dimensions, Correct Datum's, KPCs, Safety characteristics
Math Data
Verify supplier have provided all drawings and specifications NR ###
etc.)? to the math data file.
G

If there is an assembly: Component or Sub component

Look for Component GD&T / Technical Specifications and
4 Component GD&T / Technical Specifications and Sub-System GD&T / Drawings / GD&T /
Sub-System GD&T / Technical Specification
NR ###
Technical Specification are available for review. Dimensional Requirements
G

If supplier is design responsible, GD&T has to be used to develop the

5 DFMEA and PFMEA. Look for GM DRE / Engineering for DFMEA GD&T / DFMEA / PFMEA DFMEA has the GM DRE agreement. NR ###
acceptance and agreement

G
B. Quality System Documentation AUDIT WORKSHEET
EVIDENCE / G
REQUIREMENT / STANDARD:
B1 DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Score Y OBSERVATIONS
In regard to PFMEA:
REQUIRED R

The Process Flow Diagram is available and complete (include receiving,

rework, scrap, gauging/inspection, shipping, conveyors,labeling, Process Flow exists and it is complete (it contains receiving,
6
software, and Part ID at receiving, WIP, finished good and shipping
Process Flow Diagram
rework, scrap, gauging/inspection, repairs, conveyors,
NR ###
areas)? shipping and labeling during entire production, etc

G
Process Flow and Material
Process Flow Diagram is consistent with the Shop floor material process Process flow and material flow are consistent
7 Flow NR
flow
G
All process steps from the Process Flow Diagram are listed in sequence Process Flow PFMEA is being linked to the Process Flow Diagram
8 in the PFMEA, including repair and rework operations, PFMEA Assure that ALL process steps have been captured and none NR ###
are missing.
G
PFMEA shall be developed on a form based on the options provided by
9
the AIAG PFMEA / AIAG VDA PFMEA Standards (where applicable)
PFMEA Template Make sure the latest templates are being used NR ###
G

PFMEA should be developed by a cross functional team, under the

Participants from Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering,
supervision of a clearly identified PFMEA Team Leader. Cross Functional Team
10
List of Participants
Operations, Quality NR ###
Best Practice: operator involved in PFMEA development
G
Supplier should develop a PFMEA Procedure aligned with the AIAG
PFMEA Procedure
FMEA / AIAG VDA PFMEA Standards (where applicable) and GM CSR
11
and part specific SORs when applicable (CG)
PFMEA Procedure Assure that the procedure highlights new technology / NR ###
software / new operations.
New Technology / Software / New Operations are included G

Pre-established PFMEA Schedule for PFMEA revisions and updates

PFMEA revision frequency should be established.
Revision Schedule Meeting notices and records of each PFMEA revision meeting
12 PFMEA should be updated regularly. Meeting minutes are being kept for
Current Updated FMEA Look for Control Plan updated accordingly
NR ###
later reference. Control Plan is being updated accordingly.
CP updated Look for invitation to meeting
G
Risk Limiting Method (GM specific risk evaluation method) is being
PFMEA
13 consistently applied using Severity, Occurrence and Detection ranking
Risk Limiting Method or similar
Risk Limiting Method or similar is being used NR ###
tables and risk is evaluated using Risk Limiting Level. G
Look for connection between DFMEA and PFMEA.
All part characteristics shall be properly evaluated during the APQP GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA
Ensure correct linkage between DFMEA and PFMEA.
14 process for determination of adequate control plan check frequencies Gap Analysis Process and
Look for completed GM 1927 21 Gap Analysis Form.
NR ###
through DFMEA/PFMEA gap analysis methodology. (CG4338 4.5.7.1) Transition Form
G

Critical Operations from customer requirements (such as KPCs) are

identified by the supplier. PFMEA
PFMEA
ALL high RPN and/or Critical line items have action plans which include SW - High severity operations marked with Delta C and
15
Error Proofing in case of failure.
SW
operator trained in meaning
NR ###
Visual Aid - Delta C
ALL Critical operations are identified and maked with Delta C (required in Work station marked with Delta C
CG4338 GM 1927 03)
G
EVIDENCE / G
REQUIREMENT / STANDARD:
B2 DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Score Y OBSERVATIONS
In regard to Control Plan:
REQUIRED R

Look and sample one line item from PFMEA to flow to CP

then to SW.
DFMEA / Process Flow
There is evidence that (DFMEA) PFMEAs, Process Control Plans, and Verify that PFMEA is updated as required and matches
PFMEA
16 Standardized Work documentation are comprehensive, sufficient, and
CP
Process Control Plan. All processes with customer severity NR ###
flow one from the other. level 8 and above from PFMEA must be noted in PCP and
SW
error proofing controls in the manufacturing process must be
verified.
G

Look for labeling stations and/or scanner stations and verify

Labeling Error proofing shall be included in Flow diagram, PFMEA and CP
17
Control Plan. (CG 4338 6.2.2) Scaning/Labeling Stations
that labeling and stations numbers are included on Flow NR ###
Diagram, PFMEA and Control Plan.
G
CQI Assessment
The Control Plan addresses print requirements relative to (dimensional, Review applicable CQI (CQI 9, CQI 11, CQI 12, etc
Control Plan
18 material, rust preventative, heat-treat, micro-finish,
Print Hazardous material spec.
Assessment.) NR ###
contamination/sediment, etc) Review Sediment Controls.
sheets G
Ensure that the current process controls and results of
The current process controls and results of recommended actions on the PFMEA recommended actions on the PFMEA are listed on the Control
19
PFMEA High Risk Items are listed on the Control Plan. CP Plan.
NR ###
Focus on High Risk items G

CP Are Current Controls listed on the PFMEA and CP?

"Current Controls" Appropriate Control and/or Redundant Inspection as
All "Current Controls" listed on the PFMEA detailed on the Control Plan
Call Out on Print/CP/PFMEA appropriate per GM 1927 21
20 and are process controls in place in the CP to address the high PFMEA NR
GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA All processes with customer severity level of 9 and above from
Risk Priority Levels or similar?
Gap Analysis Process and PFMEA must be noted in CP and controls in the
Transition Form manufacturing process must be verified regardless of RPN.

G
Reverse PFMEA Events
PFMEA risk reduction activities and meeting minutes.
Suppliers shall have appropriate preventive risk reduction projects based GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA
21
on the effects of the potential problems. Gap Analysis Process and
Look for evidence on the production line or stations of reverse NR ###
PFMEA activities or improvements.
Transition Form G
Sample size and frequency are determined based on risk and Is there a history of failures in spite of existing controls?
22 occurrence number from PFMEA. Control Plan Does internal data (scrap, rework, FTQ, etc) suggest sample NR
Sample size and frequency are reviewed on regular basis. sizes and frequency are adequate?
G

Common cause and special cause process variation shall be identified

23
prior to sampling and control plan definition. (CG4338 4.5.7.2)
Control Plan Control Plan sampling definition activities. NR ###
G

The supplier shall assure that all high severity items are cascaded to
DFMEA / PFMEA /
their suppliers (Tiered suppliers)
24
The supplier should perform PFMEA Gap analysis or similar to their
Control Plan Is control data from the tier supplier reviewed and kept on file? NR ###
(Tiered suppliers)
tiered suppliers.
G
Make sure gauges/fixtures are ID Equipment taged, Calibrated
(CMM report) with certification in the latest engineering
Gauges change level.
The control methods should be continually evaluated for effectiveness of
25
process control. (AIAG APQP and Control Plan Manual / MSA)
Fixtures Check if the gauge R&R is done on a yearly basis for all NR ###
Error Proofing (EP) gauges. If gauge R&R is between 10 and 30 percent
(according MSA & PPAP Manual) action plan is required.
Look for EP verification methods.
G

Ensure that Gauge/Fixtures Instructions are available and

closer to the Equipment and easily accessible.
The measurement system technique should be done to ensure control of Gauges/
Ensure that Gauge is functional according Standard Part and
26 monitoring and measurement devices prior to relying on a measurement Fixtures
operator Gauge instruction.
NR ###
system. Measurement devices
Check Gauges /fixtures Preventive Maintenance Plan and
latest calibration records
G

If applicable supplier shall ensure Supplier Quality Part/Process Specific

Have supplier reviewd part specific SOR and have latest
CG is applied to support Control Plan development.
Part-specific SOR document available to ensure Part-Specific Quality & Process
27 For parts with an applicable Supplier Quality Part/Process Specific CG,
CP SOR (if applicable) is applied to support Control Plan
NR ###
the supplier shall comply with any additional control plan check
development.
frequency requirements specified therein.
G
GM Confidential 07/13/2023 Page 2
Process Control Plan Audit Worksheet Printed 07/13/2023
C. Quality System related to Control Plan Implementation AUDIT WORKSHEET
EVIDENCE / G
REQUIREMENT / STANDARD:
DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Score Y OBSERVATIONS
In regard to Quality System Implementation Plan
REQUIRED R

Review PPAP data for all components of the assembly,

including interim approvals (How do you indicate that
Supplier PPAP Packages component parts/assemblies on the manufacturing floor are
The organization shall have records of material and/or performance test
CP approved prior to release?).
28 results for tests specified on the
Certification/Test Records Are the records of material and/or performance test results for
NR ###
design record or Control Plan. (AIAG PPAP 2.2.10).
Cumulative Control Data tests specified on the Control Plan?
Are controls in place to ensure only approved incoming
material released for production?
G
The assembly and/or Component Control Plan shall contain part Is the supplier familiar and has reviewed all applicable
SSCT/CTS
monitoring requirements as defined in the SOR appendix C1 as well as appendixes on the RFQ or eSOR packages?
29
any additional requirements defined by the supplier and approved by
CG4338
Are all SSCT and CTS comtenplated on CP?
NR ###
CP
supplier quality. (CG4338 Appendix F) G

Is the training matrix posted on manufacturing line?

The training plan shall address new operators and current operators
Training Matrix Look for robust training plan that include quality.
30 performing new functions. Training status should be displayed near the
CP Look for training matrix for direct and temporary workers.
NR ###
manufacturing process. (CG4338 4.5.1.1)

Is the training matrix posted on manufacturing line?

The training plan should include all operators including temporary or
Training Matrix Look for robust training plan that include quality.
31 supplemental employees to ensure that they follow control plan to meet
CP Look for Training matrix for direct and temporary workers
NR ###
quality and productivity requirements. (CG4338 4.5.1.2)

Are there any rework or recovery stations on the assembly line

All rework and recovery processes shall have standardized work and be
or supplier facility?
documented as separate operations in the Production Control Plan. CP
32
(CG4338 4.5.3.3) and match with reworking operations analized on the Rework/Recovery Instructions
If any rework is performed has this been documented on CP? NR ###
Are all steps of the rework process listed on CP?
PFMEA
G
Check for frecuency column on Control Plan and compare to
Error proofing devices must be checked for function (failure or simulated CP
error proofing list.
33 failure) based on volume (at least once per shift -at the beginning of the Set Up Records
What is the standard on error proofing verification?
NR ###
shift), or according to the Process Control Plan. (CG4338 4.5.6.2) Error Eroofing Lists
Are operators trained on error proofing verification? G
The traceability plan shall be documented and included in the Process Look for Lot Controls, Dimensional Traceability to N.I.S.T.
Control Plan. (CG4338 4.6.1) and have the system in place and comply When parts require traceability, do controls link component
34
with Bar Code and Label Requirements for Traceability and Error
Traceability Documents
traceability to the final part?
NR ###
Proofing. Are labeling stations and labels linked to tracebility system? G
If inline component or final assembly testing is performed, per the control Look for assembly line or machine inline testing.
Traceability Documents
plan, the supplier shall have traceability (with verification) that the Check if testing results are linked to traceabilty system.
35
component or final assembly passed all required inline testing, including
CP
Are all tests performed during assembly or component
NR ###
tests results
those that have been reworked. (CG4338 4.6.5.) manufacturing listed and documented on CP? G
CP
All part characteristics shall be include and properly evaluated during the
DFMEA/PFMEA
APQP process for determination of adequate control plan check How CP frequencies are determined?
36
frequencies through DFMEA/PFMEA gap analysis methodology.
GM 1927 21 DFMEA PFMEA
Check that all CP frequencies are aligned to DFEMA/PFMEA.
NR ###
gap analysis process and
(CG4338 4.5.7.1 / 4.5.7.7) G
transition form
Suppliers shall document and submit their Pre-Launch Control Plan. Has the supplier developed a Pre-Launch CP?
“Early Production Containment” (GM 1927 28) provides procedures for Pre-Launch CP Was EPC procedures used for development of Pre-Launch
37 the Pre- Launch Control Plan. All parts requiring production part approval EPC Documents CP? NR ###
(PPAP) shall also comply with the Early Production Containment CP Are all items on Pre-Launch CP identified and aligened to
requirements. (CG4338 4.8.3.4.1) Production CP?
G
D. Control Plan Implementation by Management AUDIT WORKSHEET
EVIDENCE / G
REQUIREMENT / STANDARD:
DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS TO ASK AND WHAT TO LOOK FOR Score Y OBSERVATIONS
In regard to Control Implementation by Management
REQUIRED R

Process Flow Does supplier have a Pre-Launch Control Plan?

The organzization leadership shall develop and implement control plans
PFMEA Is Pre-launch CP aligned to Production CP?
38 at the system, subsystem, component and/or material level for the
Pre-launch CP Are control plans linkage and incorporates information from
NR ###
relevant manufacturing site and all product supplied. (IATF 8.5.1.1)
CP the design risk analysis, process flow diagram and PFMEA?
G

During the planning process, the team will encounter product

design and/or processing concerns. These concerns should
be documented on a matrix with assigned responsibility and
timing. Disciplined problem solving methods are
recommended in difficult situations. Analytical techniques
The Organization shall provide measurement and conformity data
described in APQP and control plan manual should be used
collected during execution of either Pre-Launch or Production CP. There
Plant Informational Board (Fast as appropriate.
is to be a process for documenting and tracking CP issues found and
39 Response Board) Look for daily updated I charts, Corrective Action Reports exist NR ###
robust Corrective Actions Reports associated to each of them.
Current I Charts for each issue identified in Early Production Containment.
Supplier Collects data to drive continuous improvements.
Look for process to verify all steps from immediate
containment through to irreversible corrective action.
Look for Supplier to be Collecting data to drive continuous
improvements. Keep top 5 lists/ P-Charts/Trends and do these
identify which documentation for improvements.

G
Leadership should ensure the Control Plan includes verification of job
CP issues are reviewed at the daily management meeting,
set-ups; first-off/last-off part validation and a reaction plan when non
40
conformity product is detected and to ensure that discrepancies from CP
Daily Meetings including timed with responsibility and documented on Plant NR ###
Informational Board (Fast Response Board).
are managed as priority areas for process improvement. G
Look for shift log/notes/Quality Alert.
Look for evidence of a closed loop on shift problems, ideally
If more than one shift, part problem information is to be passed across person to person cross over.
41
shifts.
Shift Log
Check for up to date information board with training records, I-
NR ###
chart, layered audit plan/results, quality emerging issues / high
focus areas G
The Organization shall review Control Plans, and update as required, for
CP
any of the following: non conformities shipped to costumer, when any Audit frequency, schedule by auditor, report form or checklist.
42
change occurs, after costumer complaint (SPPS), and implementation of
CP Review Meetings Minutes
Management involvement and schedule.
NR ###
SPPS
CA and at a set frequency based on a risk analysis.
G

Determine which process parameters satisfy the product

specifications with reasonable evidence. These parameters
Are major process parameters identified with reasonable evidence DOE or other should be included in the PFMEA and PCP. This evidence is
43 [example:DOE (Design of Experiment) or Full Factoral method etc. ] and Experimental Date recommended as a DOE (Design of Experiment) or Full NR ###
controlled with the CP? Process Control Plan Factoral method and should be validated with enough sample
size. The defined critical process parameters should be
controlled and password protected in the PLC (Programmable
Logic Controller). Supervisor’s approval would be required to
change the parameters. G
Are all checks to be done under the PCP requirements
performed?
Management shall be involved in reviewing sample sizes. Frequencies Are results properly documented?
shall be determined based on risk and occurrence of failure mode to Are suitable actions taken in case of deviations?
ensure that the customer is adequately protected from receiving the PFMEA Is there evidence that all concerns are tracked back to the
44
product represented by the inspection/tests before the results of the Process Control Plan PFMEA to confirm that the failure mode has been included?
NR ###
inspection/tests are known. (GM IATF 16949 - Customer Specific Look for PFMEA change log cross referenced to SPPS
Requirements 8.5.1.1) records log, customer complaint log, voice of the process
review, warranty data, etc.
Is there evidence that controls have been added, or
controls/RPNs revised based on concerns. G
Management to understand the implication of not conforming to Control Costumer-specific requirements regarding Control Plan
Plan implementation can result in SPPS being issued with potential for approval and reviews need to be integrated into the internal
45 GM additional resources support and cost recovery. Leadership should CP Revision Log creation, reviewing, and updating of Control Plans. NR ###
ensure and review costumer-specific requirements after review or Verify understanding that failure to execute Control Plan will
revision of the Control Plan. result in immediate SPPS. G

Approved Approved, but need Documentation Rejected

In case of deviations use Supplier Action Plan Form tab.
If SQE considers to deep dive more the quality system and production floor use or refrence to GM 1927 72 Shop Floor Audit.

Supplier Representative Name with Signature Follow-Up Audit Date GM Representative Name with Signature

GM Confidential 07/13/2023 Page 3

Process Performance SUPPLIER ACTION PLAN REPORT
Supplier Start Date: SQE
Location Rev. Date: SQE Phone & Fax #:
Duns Grad Date: Manager:
Commodity Program: Group:
Prepared by: Creativity Team:
"Color Codes"
G Green - Task Completed on Time
Y Yellow - Task May Be Late
R Red - Task is Late
W White - Task Re-Timed, No Status
B Blue - Task Status is Incorrect / Not Updated
On Track (Bold Box/No Color)
TOTAL TOTAL STATUS
0 0
STATUS HISTORY
TARGET ACTUAL
ACTION DATE LAST
ITEM ACTION ITEM CLOSE CLOSE Most COUNTER MEASURES
LEADER OPENED UPDATE
DATE DATE Oldest Recent

# 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

GM Confidential 07/13/2023 Page 4

Process Performance SUPPLIER ACTION PLAN REPORT
B5: Person at supplier that prepared the form for the GM SQE. (If applicable)

C16: ACTION ITEM: The item that requires action to improve the process or quality of the product being produced.

D3: Graduation Date:

This Date Will Be Determined By GM SQ Directors

D4: For PDC SQE Only:

Identify which program your supplier is in "IQ' or "SQA".

D16: ACTION LEADER: The person that leads the team to make the improvements. This should be the suppliers person but may be a GM Management
person.

E15: Formula: DO NOT TYPE IN THIS CELL, UNLESS YOUR ARE MODIFYING THE FORMULA

E16: START DATE: The date the action item was identified and listed in the action item column

F16: TARGET CLOSE DATE: The date the supplier will complete the action item.

This date may change. If the date changes, you are required to entry the correct color code in the pass status and present status columns.
A comment on why the change to be entered in the comment field

G15: Formula: DO NOT TYPE IN THIS CELL, UNLESS YOUR ARE MODIFYING THE FORMULA

G16: ACTUAL CLOSE DATE: The date the action item was closed TO INCLUDE VALIDATION.

The SQE should validate the action item as being closed and RESOLVED.

H16: LAST UPDATE: The date the SQE reviewed the action item.

I16: PAST STATUS: The cell is filled in when the status changes. Oldest status to the left
If status is WHITE put a "W" in the cell. Do not leave blank.
Copy the cell for the correct color.

COLOR CODE:
GREEN: Task Completed on Time
YELLOW: Action item is in trouble and may affect target date.
RED: Action item has missed target date.
WHITE: Task Re-Timed, No Status
BLUE: Task Status is incorrect / Not Updated

O16: COUNTER MEASURES:

GM Confidential 07/13/2023 Page 5

Revision History – (date) Changes

Section Change
Quality System Implementation by Management
BIQS implementation to replace QSB+
Worksheet: Item 57

Updated duplicate question 17 and adjusted formulas

Summary and Worksheet
and numbering to include additional question

All tabs Added GM Confidential Footer

Added Batch & Hold in question #45 of QS
Worksheet under the section: Quality System (QS)
implemetation plan. Also, include revision number,
Implementation plan
start at revision #2.0
Worksheet under the section: Quality System
Changed BIQS Audit with BIQS self-assessment
Implementation by Management
All tabs Replaced PRR with SPPS records
All Sections/tabs All sections rewriten / New Audit
 Who / Team Revision # Date
0.0
Suraj Lawal / Global Business Process 4-Jan-16

1.0 8-Jun-16

Lawal / GBP 1.1 11-Jul-16

Brian Schatz & Suraj Lawal /
2.0 3-Dec-18
Global Business Process

Lidia Natanail 3.0 29-Mar-19

Lidia Natanail / Matias Barajas 4.0 18-Nov-21