Finalll Na I2
Finalll Na I2
Finalll Na I2
Abriam, Jeffrey S.
Alejandro, Clarence M.
June 2023
Introduction
Leafy Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) belongs to the family Brassicaceae; its
origin is undefined but is thought to have originated in Central Asia. A tall, unbranched
annual with various leaf shapes and sizes, flowers (with or without) and a terminal
mustard is commonly grown in Southeast Asian nations. Leaf mustard is a popular green
vegetable on the area market. This vegetable is prepared in a variety of ways, including
stir-frying, pickling, and brining. It has a distinct flavor and a strong scent.
healthiest green leafy vegetables accessible in the country. Leaves are consumed as green
leafy vegetables, either raw or pickled in brine, and are often used in soups and stews. Its
beautiful top greens contain higher levels of vitamin A, carotene, vitamin K, and
flavonoid anti-oxidants than other fruits and vegetables (Pinoyentre, 2019). With these
attributes and uses, leaf mustard has established itself as one of the most prominent green
obtain a satisfactory yield and also provide variable environmental conditions within the
same location for growth and development of crop and yield stability. (Bali et al.,
2010). Direct seeding involves sowing mustard seeds directly into the soil, either by
broadcasting or using a seed drill. This method can result in variable seedling emergence
and spacing due to environmental conditions and competition from weeds. Mustard
plants grown from direct seeding tend to have a deeper and more extensive root system,
which can help them better access soil resources such as water and nutrients.
controlled environment such as a greenhouse or nursery and then transplanting them into
the field. This method allows for more precise and uniform plant spacing, which can
reduce competition for resources and improve yields. Transplanted mustard plants also
tend to have a shallower root system, which can make them more susceptible to
environmental stress such as drought. However, the reduced competition for resources
can offset this disadvantage and result in higher yields. (Porciuncula et al., 2014;
Shimoguchi & Mojica, 2016). Therefore. This study aims to identify the growth of
mustard subjected to the various planting practices, most effective planting practices for
The general objective of the study is to assess the growth response of mustard to
The study aims to investigate the potential growth response of mustard subjected
questions:
1. Is there significant different between the number of leaves and leaf size of
mustard?
Direct planting
Indirect planting
green leafy vegetables, either raw or pickled in brine, and are often used in soups and
stews. With these attributes and uses, leaf mustard has established itself as one of the
Indeed, one of the healthiest green leafy vegetables accessible in the country.
Leaves are consumed as green leafy vegetables, either raw or pickled in brine, and are
often used in soups and stews. Its beautiful top greens contain higher levels of vitamin A,
carotene, vitamin K, and flavonoid anti-oxidants than other fruits and vegetables
(Pinoyentre, 2019). With these attributes and uses, leaf mustard has established itself as
one of the most prominent green vegetables in the country. Mustard is cultivated in
mostly under temperate climates. It is also grown in certain tropical and subtropical
regions as a cold weather crop. Indian mustard is reported to tolerate annual precipitation
rainfed crop, moderately tolerant to soil acidity, preferring a pH from 5.5 to 6.8, thrives in
areas with hot days and cool night and can fairly sustain drought. Mustard requires well-
drained sandy loam soil. (Kandpal, B. K., & Chauhan, J. S., 2012).
Direct seeding involves sowing mustard seeds directly into the soil, either by
broadcasting or using a seed drill. This method can result in variable seedling emergence
and spacing due to environmental conditions and competition from weeds. Mustard
plants grown from direct seeding tend to have a deeper and more extensive root system,
which can help them better access soil resources such as water and nutrients. However,
direct seeding may result in lower yields due to uneven plant spacing and competition for
controlled environment such as a greenhouse or nursery and then transplanting them into
the field. This method allows for more precise and uniform plant spacing, which can
Transplanted mustard plants also tend to have a shallower root system, which can make
them more susceptible to environmental stress such as drought. However, the reduced
competition for resources can offset this disadvantage and result in higher yields.
(Porciuncula et al., 2014; Shimoguchi & Mojica, 2016). The growth response of mustard
to direct and indirect planting methods can be complex and depend on a variety of factors
evaluation of these factors and an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each
Experimental Crops
In the study, the Namhong type of Ramgo Mustard was used. It is adaptable to
most soil types, but thrives in well-drained, loamy soils with a pH between 5.5 and 7. It is
ideal to transplant. Temperatures ranging from 20 to 25oC are ideal for plant growth. 30
Treatments
Treatment 1: Direct
Treatment 2: Indirect
The research study was conducted in Purok 7, San Miguel, Quezon, Nueva Ecija.
The planting set up was planted on April 25, 2023, it was be done outside the Central
Data Gathering
The data gathered on the study, Growth Response of Mustard (Brassica juncea
Germination rate,
Unmarketable yield.
The collected data was analyzed statistically using the Statistical Tool for
Germination Rate
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
9.33
7.67
Graph 1 shows the germination rate of mustard after 7 days for direct planting,
which has the highest mean of 2.60, and indirect planting, which has the lowest mean of
2.47. It shows that direct planting is better on second-week plants. In most fields, lower
values for the coefficient of variation are considered better because there is less
Number of Leaves
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
5.33
5.27
4.6
4.4
3.07
3.07
2.47
2.6
2.33
2.33
Graph 2 shows the number of leaves of mustard from week 1 to week 5. In week
1, treatment 1 and treatment 2 had the same mean of 2.33. In week 2, treatment 1 had the
highest mean of 2.60, while treatment 2 had 2.47. In week 3, treatment 1 and treatment 2
had the same mean of 3.07. In week 4, the mean of treatment 1 was higher at 4.60. In
week 5, the mean of treatment 1 was higher than treatment 2, which only had 5.27.
Graph 3. Leaf Area
Leaf Area
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
37.5
36.19
14.23
14.5
6.21
6.21
5.84
4.97
1.43
1.37
Graph 3 shows the leaf area of mustard from week 1 to week 5. In week 1,
treatment 1 had the highest mean of 1.43, while treatment 2 only had 1.37. In week 2,
treatment 2 had the highest mean of 5.84, while treatment 1 had 4.97. In week 3,
treatment 1 and treatment 2 had the same mean of 6.21. In week 4, treatment 1 had a
higher mean of 14.50, and treatment 2 had 14.23. In week 5, the mean of treatment 1,
Fresh Weight
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
14.5
11.9
Graph 4 shows the fresh weight of mustard, treatment 1 with the mean of 14.50 is
marketable - unmarketable
Treatment 1 Treatment 2
15
6
5
4
Ma rk et a b le U n m a r k et a b l e
Expenses
Seedlings 20
Polyethylene bag 30
Total expenses 50
Gross income 80
Net income 30
Conclusion
growth to different planting practices. The data were collected by the researcher using a
completely randomized design (CRD). The study was carried out using two types of
planting methods: direct and indirect planting practices. Direct seeding means planting at
the crop area with the use of seeds, while indirect seeding means planting with the use of
According to Sharma, S (2013), direct seeding produced higher yields and better
quality mustard than transplanting. The authors suggest that direct seeding is a more
efficient and cost-effective method for growing mustard. In the results of the
experimental research in the five weeks and weekly observations, it is shown in the mean
that the direct planting was only greater in the number of leaves in the fifth week
observation and also in the leaf area of mustard in the last observation of mustard. The
direct planting got a larger mean than the indirect planting, but when the fresh weight is
determined, the mean average of the indirect planting is 14.50 compared to the direct
Both transplanting and direct planting can be viable ways for producing mustard,
and which method to choose depends on a number of factors, including the individual
variety of mustard, the local climate and growth conditions, and the farmer's resources.
Farmers who want to get a head start on their crop can employ transplanting,
which allows them to start their plants indoors or in a greenhouse before taking them to
the field. This can assist the farmer get an early harvest by ensuring that the plants are
robust and healthy before being exposed to the environment. Transplanting can also help
farmers with limited space or who want to optimize their production per square foot by
Direct planting, on the other hand, might be a viable alternative for farmers with
a bigger field or who wish to save time and money by planting directly in the ground.
This strategy is especially effective in locations with a short growing season since it
transplanting step. Direct planting can also help farmers avoid the danger of transplant
shock, which occurs when plants are relocated from one environment to another.
Ultimately, the choice of whether to use transplanting or direct planting will depend
on the specific circumstances and goals of the farmer. Experimenting with both methods
and monitoring the results can help farmers determine which method works best for their
https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/11685.
https://www.grocery.coop/article/mustard-greens
entrepreneur.com/2019/11/04/production-of-mustard-greens-mustasa/ . Accessed
January29, 2023
Ravindra Kumar Meena, Kumari, M., Ganesh Kumar Koli, Ram Kishor Meena, & Kiran.
Sharma, S. (2013). Effect of direct and transplanting method of sowing on growth, yield
and quality of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). International Journal of Agriculture and
Shekhawat, K., Rathore, S., Premi, O., Kandpal, B. K., & Chauhan, J. S. (2012).
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/408284
Appendices
GERMINATION RATE