Sablayan Executive Summary 2016
Sablayan Executive Summary 2016
Sablayan Executive Summary 2016
Introduction
Sablayan is a first class municipality and the largest in the Province of Occidental
Mindoro based on land area. According to the August 1, 2015 census, it has a population
of 83,169. It is politically subdivided into 22 barangays occupying a land area of 218,880
hectares. The Municipality is headed by the Municipal Mayor, Hon. Eduardo B. Gadiano
while Sangguniang Bayan is headed by Hon. Vice-Mayor Andres D. Dangeros.
Financial Highlights
Increase
2016 2015
(Decrease)
Financial Position
Assets P812,585,187 P577,583,682 P235,001,505
Liabilities 209,196,418 106,815,251 102,381,167
Equity 603,388,769 470,768,431 132,620,338
Financial Performance
Income 480,561,175 418,907,282 61,653,893
Expenses 351,629,605 310,746,563 40,883,042
Surplus 128,931,570 108,160,719 20,770,851
For the exceptions cited above, we recommended that the Management (a) enjoin
the Inventory Committee to conduct actual physical count of all properties of the
Municipality including land, land improvements, buildings and others and furnish the
OIC-Municipal Accountant with copy of the RPCPPE within the prescribed timeframe to
facilitate timely verification and reconciliation of accounts with the general ledger; (b)
the GSO maintain property cards which should be regularly updated for proper upkeep
and monitoring of properties; (c) the OIC-Municipal Accountant reconcile the inventory
report and the ledger balance and adjust the affected PPE accounts for their fair
presentation in the financial statements; and (d) the Management through the GSO,
execute deeds of donation to transfer ownership of PPE issued to barangays and other
government entities.
The following are the other significant observations and recommendations in the
audit of the Municipality of Sablayan for the year 2016:
3. Ten parcels of land valued at P46,848,870.00 were not yet transferred in the name of
the Municipality.
We recommended that the Management cause the titling of lots in the name of the
Municipality in order to ensure ownership and control over the properties and to
avoid any legal impediments due to possible third party claims.
We also recommended that the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC), Technical
Working Group and Secretariat be careful in preparing procurement forms to ensure
the correctness and accuracy of information and for the BAC to review the documents
before affixing their signatures thereon.
5. Deficiencies were noted in the technical review, evaluation and inspection of seven
infrastructure projects of the Municipality totaling P61,256,499.75.
We recommended that the Municipal Mayor require the Municipal Engineer and the
Municipal Project Inspectorate Team to submit the requested documents for further
evaluation. The Approved Budget Cost should be computed pursuant to the DPWH
Department Order No. 22. Further, we recommended that the Municipal Engineer
closely monitor/supervise project implementation to ensure contractor’s compliance
with the specifications of the contract.
6. The procurements of heavy equipment and other goods totaling P62,385,000.00 and
P4,080,948.75, respectively, were made not in accordance with RA No. 9184 and its
Revised IRR. The related payments were also made despite incomplete
documentation, contrary to COA Circular No. 2012-001 thereby affecting the
legality, validity and propriety of the disbursements.
We also recommended that the BAC, Technical Working Group and Secretariat to be
careful in preparing procurement forms to ensure the correctness and accuracy of
information and for the BAC to review the documents before affixing their signatures
thereon.
7. The Municipality failed to maximize utilization of its Local Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management (LDRRM) Fund totaling P35,180,748.32 and registered a financial
delivery rate of 59.24% during the year.
8. The ten-year Ecological Solid Waste Management Plan of the Municipality was
conditionally approved by the National Solid Waste Management Commission.
We also recommended for the remittance of share from port collections totaling
P2,507,264.25 to the Philippine Ports Authority.
10. The 20% Development Fund was not efficiently utilized, registering a 46.51%
financial delivery rate, thereby affecting the attainment of socio-economic
development and environmental outcomes of the Municipality.
We recommended for the optimal utilization of the 20% Development Fund and that
the Management faithfully carry out the developmental objectives by which the fund
has been created. Projects under this fund should be geared towards the pursuance of
development objectives that would lead to the attainment of a truly developed
community.