The document provides guidance on writing different types of academic papers including reaction papers, review papers, critique papers, and position papers. It outlines the key sections and focuses for each paper type. Reaction papers allow sharing thoughts on something read and involve prewriting, determining a thesis, and organizing a response. Review papers summarize recent work on a topic through sections on the abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion. Critique papers briefly summarize and critically evaluate a work using approaches like formalism, feminism, or media criticism. Position papers generate support for an issue by describing a position, rationale, and facts to argue the division of opinions on a contested topic.
The document provides guidance on writing different types of academic papers including reaction papers, review papers, critique papers, and position papers. It outlines the key sections and focuses for each paper type. Reaction papers allow sharing thoughts on something read and involve prewriting, determining a thesis, and organizing a response. Review papers summarize recent work on a topic through sections on the abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion. Critique papers briefly summarize and critically evaluate a work using approaches like formalism, feminism, or media criticism. Position papers generate support for an issue by describing a position, rationale, and facts to argue the division of opinions on a contested topic.
The document provides guidance on writing different types of academic papers including reaction papers, review papers, critique papers, and position papers. It outlines the key sections and focuses for each paper type. Reaction papers allow sharing thoughts on something read and involve prewriting, determining a thesis, and organizing a response. Review papers summarize recent work on a topic through sections on the abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion. Critique papers briefly summarize and critically evaluate a work using approaches like formalism, feminism, or media criticism. Position papers generate support for an issue by describing a position, rationale, and facts to argue the division of opinions on a contested topic.
The document provides guidance on writing different types of academic papers including reaction papers, review papers, critique papers, and position papers. It outlines the key sections and focuses for each paper type. Reaction papers allow sharing thoughts on something read and involve prewriting, determining a thesis, and organizing a response. Review papers summarize recent work on a topic through sections on the abstract, introduction, body, and conclusion. Critique papers briefly summarize and critically evaluate a work using approaches like formalism, feminism, or media criticism. Position papers generate support for an issue by describing a position, rationale, and facts to argue the division of opinions on a contested topic.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7
Enfocad Reviewer of the text.
Otherwise, you are
just summarizing what you read. Lesson 8: Reaction Paper 8. Determine your thesis - This Reaction Paper - is a form of is the core of your reaction paper. academic writing that allows the Take all your points, opinions, writer to share their thoughts and and observations, and combine ideas on what they have seen or them into one claim that you will read. prove How to Write a Reaction 9. Organize your paper - It Paper? needs an introduction, body 1. Prewriting and Actively paragraphs, and a conclusion. Reading - understand the 10. Gather quotations - find purpose of a reaction paper. quotations or statements that will 2. Figure out what the support your points. assignment is asking - figure out 11. Structure your paragraphs exactly what your teacher or - Your paragraphs should always professor is looking for. start with a topic sentence. You 3. Read the text you are can start with what the author assigned right after it is says and follow that with your assigned - A reaction paper is a reaction. process of exploring the texts, 12. Keep it short - The topic which means you take the sentence should put forward your information you read and bring it intention without forcing your together so you can analyze and reader to hunt it down; keeping it evaluate. short will help keep your 4. Annotate the text as you intention clear. read - Annotating in the margins 13. Avoid introducing yourself of the text allows you to easily - Never use statements such as; locate quotations, plot lines, “I am going to tell you…” or character development, or “My paper is about…” or “I reactions to the text. studied [this] which is important 5. Question as you read - This is because of [this]”. where your evaluation of the 14. Avoid starting with a material and your reaction begins quotation - The topic sentence 6. Free write - Write your should introduce the paragraph reactions and evaluations of the and include your opinion, not author's ideas. someone else’s. If the quote is opinion-based, substitute it for 7. Decide on your angle - your own opinion. Reaction papers have to be critical and have some evaluation Lesson 9: Review Paper Review Paper/ Literature Rev -write the thesis statement -the purpose of it is to succinctly Body or Discussion review recent progress in a -experimental evidence. Explain particular topic. the data and point out any -the paper summarizes the controversies in the field current state of knowledge of the - use figures or tables to show topic key data -provides background info., to Conclusion establish importance, demonstrate reliability, and carve -summarize major points but out a space for further addition to keep them brief. research. -point out the significance of Review P. vs. Research P. these results. The review paper does not -discuss the questions that remain describe the original research in the area. conducted by the author(s). References Research Paper, on the other hand, contains original research -the instructor will give min. work by the author. num. of references, but typically 8-10 ref. Sections of a Review Paper -APA 7th edition Abstract -a contextual sentence about your motivation behind your research topic -your thesis statements -a descriptive statement about the types of lit. used in the review -summarize your findings -conclusion(s) based upon your findings Introduction -brief (1/5 of the paper) -grab the reader’s interest -explain the “big picture” relevance - provide background info Lesson 10: Critique Paper psychological, and economic oppression Critique - is a genre of academic writing that briefly summarizes and -Are the male characters powerful critically evaluates a work or or superior in their position while concept. the female characters are subordinate or inferior? They analyze this kind of works Marxism - concerned with the Creative Works – novels, exhibits, difference between economic films, images classes. Attempts to reveal that the Research – monographs, journal ultimate source of people’s articles, reviews, experiences is the socioeconomic system. Media – news reports, feature articles -Focus on how class, power, race, and economic status affect the Critical approaches in writing a content and theme of a certain work Critique New Historicism - posits that New Criticism (Formalism) - every literary work is the product claims that literary works have of its time and world. As the means intrinsic properties and treats each to understand cultural and work as a distinct work of art. intellectual history. -Elements of a story character, -Focus on the era and significant setting, conflict, etc. Poem (meter, events that happened during the figurative devices, imagery, theme) time the text (or any other art) was Movies (sound effects, transitions, produced. shots) -How did Juan Luna’s spolarium -We use the formalism to determine depict the happenings during the the meaning by focusing on literary time it was painted? Reader Response - is concerned Media Criticism - dissect a with the reviewer’s reaction as an popular film and other forms to audience of a literary work explain to a broad audience how, in -Claims that the reader’s role academic terms, these cultural cannot be separated from the artifacts can be reflective of social understanding of the work issues, evidence artistic -Claims that a text does not have accomplishment, offer a critical meaning until the reader reads and voice to power, and much more interprets it -Often taking the form of a visual -This criticism is focused on the essay, the media critique requires message of the text editorializing and translating both written and visual source materials Feminism - focuses on how into an understandable whole literature presents women as subjects of socio-political, Lesson 11: Position Paper 5. Stating Your Thesis - an assertion about your topic, Position Paper - an essay or something you claim to be true report which expresses a position, conclusion, or 6. Writing with Style and recommendation concerning a Clarity – you should have good: Diction – refers to the choice of contested issue or undecided words for the expression of ideas question. Paragraphs – developing and - The purpose of a position framing an idea or impression. paper is to generate support for As a general rule, you should an issue. It describes a position address only one major idea per on an issue and the rationale for paragraph that position. It is based on facts Transition – provide the reader that provide a solid foundation with directions for how to piece for your arguments. together your ideas into a Techniques for Writing a logically coherent argument. Position Paper 1. Issue Criteria - Choose an issue where there is a clear division of opinion and which is arguable with facts and inductive reasoning 2. Analyzing an Issue and Developing an Argument
Grammar and Spelling –
Mechanical errors are usually the main reason for lack of clarity in essays, so be sure to thoroughly proofread your paper before handing it in. 3. Considering your audience Plagiarism and Academic and determining your Honesty - is a form of stealing; viewpoint – is your topic as with other offences against the interesting? law, ignorance is no excuse. The 4. Organization – introduction, way to avoid plagiarism is to body & conclusion give credit where credit is due. Lesson 12: Logical Fallacies supporting controversial legislation or policies. Logical Fallacy Slippery Slope - assumes that a -Logical fallacies are flawed, certain course of action will deceptive, or false arguments that necessarily lead to a chain of can be proven wrong with future events. The slippery slope reasoning. fallacy takes a benign premise or -Fallacies are common errors in starting point and suggests that it reasoning that will undermine the will lead to unlikely or ridiculous logic of your argument. outcomes with no supporting -Fallacies can be either evidence. illegitimate arguments or Straw Man - attacks a different irrelevant points and are often subject rather than the topic identified because they lack being discussed — often a more evidence that supports their extreme version of the claim. counterargument. The purpose of -Avoid these common fallacies in this misdirection is to make one's your own arguments. position look stronger than it is.
Types of Logical Fallacy Circular Arguments - occur
when a person's argument repeats Ad Hominem - uses personal what they already assumed attacks rather than logic. This before without arriving at a new fallacy occurs when someone conclusion. rejects or criticizes another point of view based on the personal Hasty Generalization - a claim characteristics, ethnic based on a few examples rather background, physical than substantial proof. appearance, or other non-relevant Arguments based on hasty traits of the person who holds it. generalizations often don't hold up due to a lack of supporting Appeal to Ignorance - argues evidence: The claim might be that a proposition must be true true in one case, but that doesn't because it has not been proven mean it's always true. false or there is no evidence against it. Red Herring - an argument that uses confusion or distraction to False Dilemma/False shift attention away from a topic Dichotomy - is a manipulative and toward a false conclusion. tool designed to polarize the Red herrings usually contain an audience, promoting one side and unimportant fact, idea, or event demonizing another. It's common that has little relevance to the real in political discourse as a way of issue. strong-arming the public into Appeal to Hypocrisy - also or mislead. In other words, known as the tu quoque fallacy saying one thing but meaning — focuses on the hypocrisy of an another. opponent. The tu quoque fallacy Appeal to Pity - relies on deflects criticism away from provoking your emotions to win oneself by accusing the other an argument rather than factual person of the same problem or evidence. Appealing to pity something comparable. attempts to pull on an audience's - an attempt to divert blame. The heartstrings, distract them, and fallacy usually occurs when the support their point of view. arguer uses apparent hypocrisy to - Someone accused of a crime neutralize criticism and distract using a cane or walker to appear from the issue. feebler in front of a jury is one Causal Fallacies - are informal example of appeal to pity. The fallacies that occur when an appearance of disability isn't an argument incorrectly concludes argument on the merits of the that a cause is related to an case, but it's intended to sway the effect. Think of the causal fallacy jury's opinion anyway. as a parent category for other Bandwagon Fallacy - assumes fallacies about unproven causes. something is true (or right or Sunk Cost - is when someone good) because others agree with continues doing something it. In other words, the fallacy because of the effort they already argues that if everyone thinks a put in it, regardless of whether certain way, then you should, the additional costs outweigh the too. potential benefits. "Sunk cost" is -One problem with this kind of an economic term for any past reasoning is that the broad expenses that can no longer be acceptance of a claim or action recovered. doesn't mean that it's factually Appeal to Authority - is the justified. People can be mistaken, misuse of an authority's opinion confused, deceived, or even to support an argument. While an willfully irrational in their authority's opinion can represent opinions, so using them to make evidence and data, it becomes a an argument is flawed. fallacy if their expertise or authority is overstated, illegitimate, or irrelevant to the topic. Equivocation - happens when a word, phrase, or sentence is used deliberately to confuse, deceive,