This document provides an overview of academic and non-academic writing styles. It discusses key differences such as academic writing being more formal, relying on research and evidence, while non-academic writing can be more subjective. It also summarizes common elements of academic writing like thesis statements, paraphrasing, outlining, and established structures for organizing writing. Specific structures discussed include IMRaD for research papers and different approaches to summarizing texts.
This document provides an overview of academic and non-academic writing styles. It discusses key differences such as academic writing being more formal, relying on research and evidence, while non-academic writing can be more subjective. It also summarizes common elements of academic writing like thesis statements, paraphrasing, outlining, and established structures for organizing writing. Specific structures discussed include IMRaD for research papers and different approaches to summarizing texts.
This document provides an overview of academic and non-academic writing styles. It discusses key differences such as academic writing being more formal, relying on research and evidence, while non-academic writing can be more subjective. It also summarizes common elements of academic writing like thesis statements, paraphrasing, outlining, and established structures for organizing writing. Specific structures discussed include IMRaD for research papers and different approaches to summarizing texts.
This document provides an overview of academic and non-academic writing styles. It discusses key differences such as academic writing being more formal, relying on research and evidence, while non-academic writing can be more subjective. It also summarizes common elements of academic writing like thesis statements, paraphrasing, outlining, and established structures for organizing writing. Specific structures discussed include IMRaD for research papers and different approaches to summarizing texts.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
EAPP Reviewer 4.
First, Then, Finally APPROACHES
Academic Text First – what happened first - Research Papers Then – key details 1. READERS-RESPONSE – your own - Objective Finally – what were the results opinion - Validate Idea 5. Give Me The Gist 2. FEMINIST – how women are - Formal “the gist” is a summary not socially, politically and - Scholarly Audience retelling the details. economically oppressed by Non-Academic THESIS STATEMENT, PARAPHRASING, AND patriarchs. - Personal Opinions OUTLINING 3. FORMALISM – authors technique - No fixed structure Thesis Statements – a concise sentence that in resolving contradiction within - Informal essay presents the main point or argument of an the work - Diaries essay or research paper. It typically appears in 4. MARXIST – focuses on class - Subjective introduction. struggle, especially on the ACADEMIC WRITING Topic – your topic operation - formal and rather personal Position – your stand on the topic intended for scholarly audience Concession – opposing viewpoint on the topic - depend heavily on research, Reason – explanation and justification of your factual evidence, and opinions of position. educated researchers PARAPHRASING - rigid structure - act of rephrasing someone else’s - main is to inform audience words or ideas. - contains vocabulary OUTLINING - objective and formal - process of organizing and NON-ACADEMIC structuring your thoughts - do not include references and 8 Main Language Features Of Academic citations Writing - does not have a rigid structure 1. Complexity - thoughts of the author or opinion - written is more complex than - example is diaries and text spoken language messages 2. Formality POV of Non-Academic Text - academic is relatively formal Subjective and personal – based on personal 3. Precision opinions and feelings rather than facts - academic writing in general, Asking rhetorical questions – it is a self- objective rather than personal. evident, and used for style as an impressive 4. Objectivity persuasive-device. - to the point ACADEMIC VOCABULARY 5. Explicitness’ - used in all academic disciplines to - clear and exact teach about the content of 6. Accuracy discipline - use accurate words, precise - e.g., a water table is different from vocabulary periodic elements table 7. Hedging ACADEMIC STRUCTURE - use linguistic devices to express - includes the established ways of hesitation or uncertainty organizing writing 8. Responsibility - different genres, - you must be responsible on what paragraph/sentence structure you are providing VARIETIES OF SUMMARIZING IMRaD 1. Somebody Wanted But So Then I – Introduction Somebody – who is the story M – Methods about R – Results Wanted – what does the main A – And character want D – Discussions But- identify the problem that the POSITION PAPER main character encountered - essay with your arguments about a So – how does the main character debatable issue solve the problem METHODS Then – tells how the story ends - what did you use 2. SAAC Methods TEXT STRUCTURES State – name of the article 1. Chronological Sequence – Assign – the name of the author describes the sequence of events Action – what the author is doing 2. Descriptive – describes Complete – complete the sentence characteristics or summary with keywords and 3. Compare & Contrast – discusses important details. similarities and differences 3. 5 W’s 1H 4. Cause and Effect – explains event who – is the story about (causes) and the results of these what – did they do? events (effects) when – did the story happened 5. Problem and Solution – a problem why – did main character did? and solution where – did it take place? how – did it happen