The Application of Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity To Reaction Mechanism
The Application of Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity To Reaction Mechanism
The Application of Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity To Reaction Mechanism
PII: S2667-3258(23)00117-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.004
Reference: FMRE 536
Please cite this article as: Qin Zhu , Shuwen Chen , Dandan Chen , Lu Lin , Kui Xiao , Liang Zhao ,
Miquel Solà , Jun Zhu , The application of aromaticity and antiaromaticity to reaction mechanisms,
Fundamental Research (2023), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.04.004
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition
of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of
record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published
in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that,
during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal
disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
© 2023 The Authors. Publishing Services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.
Ltd.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Review
Qin Zhua,b, Shuwen Chena, Dandan Chena, Lu Lina, Kui Xiaob, Liang Zhaoc, Miquel Solàd, Jun
Zhua,e,*
a
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Collaborative Innovation
Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials (iChEM), College of Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
*
Corresponding author: jun.zhu@xmu.edu.cn (J. Zhu).
b
Key Laboratory for Organic Electronics & Information Displays (KLOEID) and Institute of
Advanced Materials (IAM), SICAM, Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications,
Nanjing 210023, China
c
Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology (Ministry of
Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
d
Institute of Computational Chemistry and Catalysis and Department of Chemistry,
University of Girona, C/ M. Aurèlia Capmany, 69, 17003 Girona, Catalonia, Spain.
e
School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172,
China
Abstract:
1
Aromaticity, in general, can promote a given reaction by stabilizing a transition state or
a product via a mobility of electrons in a cyclic structure. Similarly, such a promotion could
be also achieved by destabilizing an antiaromatic reactant. However, both aromaticity and
transition states cannot be directly measured in experiment. Thus, computational chemistry
has been becoming a key tool to understand the aromaticity-driven reaction mechanisms. In
this review, we will analyze the relationship between aromaticity and reaction mechanism
to highlight an importance of density functional theory calculations and present it according
to an approach via either aromatizing a transition state/product or destabilizing a reactant
by antiaromaticity. Specifically, we will start with a particularly challenging example of
dinitrogen activation followed by other small-molecule activation, C-F bond activation,
rearrangement, as well as metathesis reactions. In addition, antiaromaticity-promoted
dihydrogen activation, CO2 capture, and oxygen reduction reactions will be also briefly
discussed. Finally, caution must be cast as the magnitude of the aromaticity in the transition
states is not particularly high in most cases. Thus, a proof of an adequate electron
delocalization rather than a complete ring current is recommended to support their
relatively weak aromaticity in the transition states.
1. Introduction
2
Hückel's rule states that monocyclic π-conjugated systems with 4n + 2 π-electrons are
aromatic in the ground state, which has been fully developed in organic chemistry. In
contrast, Baird’s rule states that species with 4n + 2 π-electrons are antiaromatic in the
lowest triplet state and those with 4n π-electrons are aromatic [8]. Excited-state aromaticity
could become a cornerstone for photochemistry but is less developed [9,10]. Currently,
excited-state (anti)aromaticity can be used to explain some observations of photophysical
and photochemical behaviors [11-13]. For instance, excited-state antiaromaticity has an
important effect on the photoinduced proton-coupled-electron-transfer (PCET) [14] and the
electrocyclization of dithienylbenzene swithes [15]. Singlet fission is a photophysical process
where an organic chromophore absorbs one photon and splits a high-energy singlet exciton
into two relatively low-energy triplet excitons, and excited-state aromaticity plays an
important role in the search of novel singlet fission materials [16]. The experimental
assessment of excited-state aromaticity in the expanded porphyrins was realized and
further verified by time-resolved optical spectroscopic measurements [17].
In this review, we will analyze the relationship between the reaction mechanism and
aromaticity and discuss it according to an approach via either stabilizing a transition
state/product by aromaticity or destabilizing a reactant by antiaromaticity, as illustrated in
Fig. 1. Specifically, enabling an antiaromatic reactant will facilitate a reaction both kinetically
and thermodynamically in most cases, whereas aromaticity gained or enhanced in a
transition state promotes a reaction kinetically and that in a product does
thermodynamically.
3
Fig. 1. Illustration of strategies for (anti)aromaticity-driven reaction via enabling an
antiaromatic reactant or aromatizing a transition state/product.
The electron density of delocalized bonds (EDDB) method [29] can be used for
almost all types of systems. EDDB measures electron delocalization quantitatively,
with the capability of dissection into components based on orbital symmetries (σ, π,
δ, etc.), open-shell α/β subspaces, molecular fragments, designated paths, and
atomic and orbital contributions. To distinguish between nonaromaticity and
antiaromaticity, the electron localization function (ELF) is recommended [ 30 ],
especially for planar systems. As long as we obtain the optimized structure of a
4
system, it is always recommended to check the difference between the longest and
the shortest bonds (BL). BL is the most direct index for bond equalization, but the
investigated bonds must be of the same nature. Although EDDB and BL are listed
only for a few cases in Fig. 2, these two methods can be used for almost every type of
cyclic structures.
For small rings, the multicenter index (MCI) [30] is one of the most popular
aromaticity descriptors based on electron delocalization. The normalized form,
MCI1/n (n is the number of ring atoms), can be used to compare aromaticity between
rings with various sizes. Since each MCI analysis involves (n-1)! calculations, it is not
recommended for large rings (n>12). Magnetic indices, such as nucleus-independent
chemical shift (NICS) [31], iso-chemical-shielding surface (ICSS) [32], anisotropy of the
current-induced density (ACID) [ 33 ], and gauge-including magnetically induced
current (GIMIC) [34] are suitable for planar systems, as it is much easier to align an
external magnetic field perpendicular to the molecular plane. NICS is one of the most
widely used aromaticity descriptor. However, it should be carefully analyzed in
transition metal systems, as the extreme deshielding of the light atoms in the vicinity
of the osmium atoms in osmapentalene derivatives could be caused by paramagnetic
couplings between σOs-C bonding orbitals and the π*Os orbitals rather than
aromaticity [35]. The ICSS can characterize aromatic and antiaromatic rings by
shielding and deshielding cones, respectively. Both the ACID and GIMIC provide
visualization of diatropic ring currents in aromatic systems and paratropic ring
currents in antiaromatics.
5
Fig. 2. A proposed procedure for selection of an aromaticity index. Y: Yes; N: No. means
the aromaticity index is suggested for this system whereas “” is not. EDDB, ICSS and
BL can be used for almost all systems. ELF can distinguish nonaromaticity and
antiaromaticity in planar systems. MCI is recommended for small rings whereas NICS,
ACID, and GIMIC are suitable for planar systems. HOMA can be used for non-metal
system and ISE for all-carbon, heterocyclic, and organometallic systems.
The cleavage of CN triple bond has attracted great interest for its wide
application in organic synthesis. Xi, Takahashi, and co-workers discovered that in the
presence of two molecules of MeCN, one of the Cp units on titanacyclopentadiene
Cp2Ti(C4Et4) (6) was cleaved into a two-carbon unit and a three-carbon unit (Fig. 3b),
which were converted into a benzene derivative (11) and a pyridine derivative (12),
respectively [42]. This reaction involves the cleavage of two C=C double bonds and
one CN triple bond. Suresh and Koga investigated the reaction mechanism by
density functional theory (DFT) calculations [43]. Results show that the titanium
nitride intermediate was stabilized by the formation of an aromatic titanacycle. The
formation of 6π-electron metallaheterocycles 8 and 10 was an aromaticity-driven
6
step with low reaction barriers. Delocalized electronic structures, energetic
stabilization, and negative NICS(0) values in 7-TS (-4.8 ppm), 8 (-9.2 ppm), 9-TS (-7.1
ppm), and 10 (-9.0 ppm), indicate that aromaticity plays an important role in the
stabilization of the intermediate and transition states in this unique process.
7
Fig. 3. Aromaticity-stabilized transition states in triple or double bond activation. (a) Gibbs
energy profiles of the N2 fixation by carbon-boron FLPs together with the NICS(1)zz
values (in ppm) in blue [41]. Computational method, ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ. (b) Activation
of the CN triple bond in MeCN. ethyl and R group were replaced for H and methyl in
DFT calculation [42,43]. NICS(0) values given (in ppm) in blue. Computational method,
8
B3LYP/6-31(G)(LanL2DZ). (c) HDDA of triyne or tetrayne [44,45]. Computational
method, M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p). (d) Electron barrier and reaction energies for the
reaction of benzyne with cyclic hydrocarbon (E‡ and ER, in kcal mol-1,
Synchronicities (Sy), and NICS (in ppm) computed at the [3,+1] ring critical point [46].
Computational method, M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p). (e) Gibbs energy profile and
aromaticity valuate (ACID plots, EDDB isosurfaces and MCI analysis) in the
cycloreversion step [47]. Computational method, SMD(dichloroethane)-(U)ωB97X-
D/def2-TZVP//(U)B3LYP-D3(BJ)/6-31G(d) (LanL2DZ). Isovalues for EDDB and ACID are
0.01 and 0.035, respectively. The NICS(1) zz values of the five membered-rings (5MRs)
in ppm. (f) NICS(1)zz values (ppm) in the 5MR and Gibbs energy barrier (kcal mol-1) for
CO2 capture by hetero-cyclopentadiene [48]. Computational method, M06-2X/6-
31+G(d).
Recent studies have reveals that the aromaticity of the transition-state also
plays a dominating role in the single bond activation and isomerization. For instance,
a metal-free C−H allylation was achieved by the iodane-guided “iodonio-Claisen” allyl
transfer of hypervalent (diacetoxy)iodoarenes [50]. In the mechanism of this reaction,
an aromatic transition state for the [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement was proposed
and confirmed by DFT calculations (Fig. 4a). The synchronicity (Sy) value (0.83),
diatropic induced ring currents in ACID analysis, negative NICS(0)zz and NICS(1)zz
values (-16.3 and -14.3 ppm) support the aromaticity of the iodine-containing six-
membered ring (6MR) transition state.
In comparison with numerous approaches to C−H bond activation, the C−F bond
activation has also attracted considerable attention from scientists [51]. However,
the activation of C−F is challenging, which might be attributed to the high bond
dissociation energy (e.g., 109 kcal mol-1 for CH3−F). Although different strategies have
been developed for the C−F bond activation, the aromaticity-driven C−F bond
activation is less developed. Recently, some of us found aromaticity-promoted C−F
bond activation in the tautomerization of a rhodium complex (Fig. 4b) [52]. The
aromaticity in the transition states and the products was indicated by the calculated
negative NICS(0) values (-22.0 and -25.0 ppm) and small bond length alternations
(BLs, 0.027 and 0.036 Å) values of the Cp* ring in 40-TS and 41, which makes the
tautomerization both thermodynamically favorable and kinetically feasible. This
study highlights an important role of aromaticity in C−F bond activation via the
stabilization of transition states and products.
In addition, some of us found that the aromaticity also played an important role
in the [1,5]-migration of pyrrolium derivatives (Fig. 4c) [53]. Although the N−Au (98.8
kcal mol-1) and N-Sn (81.7 kcal mol-1) bonds have higher bond dissociation energies
than the N−F bond (57.6 kcal mol-1), they have lower activation barriers (4.5 and 4.9
kcal mol-1 for AuPMe3 and SnH3, respectively) than the N−F bond in the [1,5]-
migration of pyrrolium derivatives. This unexpected phenomenon could be attributed
to the aromatic stabilization of the transition states. The [1,5]-migration of pyrrolium
derivatives shows that the synergistic effect of aromaticity, bond strength, and
frontier molecular orbital determines the activation energies and reaction energies. It
should be noted that aromatic-promoted [1,5]-migrations were also observed
previously [54,55]. For instance, Alabugin and co-workers found that the NICS(1)
value for the transition state in [1,5]-migration was negative, which was consistent
with the facile thermodynamics and kinetics process [54]. Electropositive migratory
groups were found to reduce the [1,5]-migration activation energies due to the
aromatic character of the transition states [55]. In addition, some of us also found
that aromaticity can be used to explain the thermodynamic stability between C-
10
binding and N-binding complexes in the reaction of [1,2] carbon migration in N-
heterocyclic carbene-coordinated transition metal complexes [56].
The Möbius aromatic transition state was also proposed computationally in the
[1,7]-hydrogen shift of 1,3,5-heptatriene by Jiao and Schleyer in 1993 [59]. In addition,
Rzepa reported double-twist Möbius aromaticity in the transition state of a 10
electron electrocyclic reaction of a (Z,E,Z)-decapentaene [60]. In 2009, Mauksch and
Tsogoeva proposed a Möbius aromatic transition state in an electrocyclic reaction
with Möbius twisted topology [61]. As shown in Fig. 4f, the 12-electron transition
states 61-TS and 10-electron 62-TS were aromatic according to the calculated
negative NICS(0) values (-12.8 and -12.1 ppm, respectively). In addition, they
extended this study to a system with a shorter carbon chain, that is, an 8-electron
acyclic decapentaene dication 64 undergoes ring closure via a Möbius aromatic
transition state 64-TS (NICS (0) = -13.8 ppm) with a reaction barrier of 23.9 kcal mol-1.
In addition, a Craig–Möbius-like σ-aromatic transition state (NICS(0) = -19.4 ppm) was
proposed in the Pd-catalyzed *π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s+ pericyclic reaction, which was
symmetry-allowed in the ground state due to the phase inversion introduced by d
orbitals of the Pd atom (Fig. 4g) [62].
11
Fig. 4. Aromaticity-stabilized transition states in single bond activation. (a) DFT
calculation of the “iodo-Claisen” rearrangement step. ACID plot (isovalue: 0.020 a.u.)
12
along with the key distances (Å) and NICS (ppm) values [50]. Computational method,
M06-2X/aug-cc-pVTZ(-PP)//M06-2X/def2-SVP. (b) Energy profiles for C-F bond
activation by the RhI complex at the level of GD3-SMD (acetonitrile)-M06/6-
311++G(d,p)(LanL2TZ(f))//B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)(LanL2DZ) [52]. The BLs (Å), dihedral
angles of the Cp* ring (DA) and NICS(0) values (ppm) were calculated at the level of
B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)(LanL2TZ(f)). (c) Gibbs energy profiles for the [1,5] shift of
substituted pyrroliums [53]. Computational method, GD3-M06L/6-
311++G(d,p)(ECPnMDF)//TPSS/6-311++G(d,p)(ECPnMDF). NICS(1)zz value (in ppm)
calculated at the level of TPSS/6-311++G(d,p)(ECPnMDF). (d) Gibbs energy profiles
calculated of C-F and C-H bonds activation in different metal complexes; MCI values
along the intrinsic reaction coordinate of C-F [57]. Computational method, at the
level of SMD (acetonitrile) (U)B3LYP-D3/6-311++G(d,p)(LanL2TZ(f))//(U)B3LYP-D3/6-
31G(d,p)(LanL2DZ). The BLs (Å), dihedral angles of the Cp* ring (DA) and NICS(0)
values (ppm) were calculated at the level of B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)(LanL2TZ(f)). (e)
Gibbs energy profile for the isomerization of [12]annulene. C and T represent cis and
trans configurations, respectively [58]. Computational method, CCSD(T)/cc-
pVDZ//BH&HLYP/6-311+G(d,p). NICS(0) (ppm) and Λ (cgs-ppm) computed at the
B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)//BH&HLYP/6-311+G(d,p). (f) Gibbs energy profile for the thermal
electrocyclic reaction [61]. Computational method for C12H14 and C10H12 species at
the level of CCSD(T)/6-31G//B3LYP/6-31G(d) and CCSD(T)/6-31G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d),
respectively. NICS values calculated for the center of mass (in ppm) at the B3LYP/6-
31G(d) level. Multiplicity (Singlet = S, Triplet = T] and charge are given in black
parentheses. (g) Pd-catalyzed *π2s + π2s + σ2s + σ2s+ pericyclic reaction [62].
Computational method, PBE0-D3(BJ)/NEVPT2. (h) Transition state structures and NICS
(ppm) for the transition states of rearrangement of 1,2-dichloroethane and syn-
sesquinorbornene, as well as the S3 transfer reaction [63].
Aromatic transition state was also involved in the pericyclic reactions. For
instance, the two triangles in the transition state (68-TS) for the rearrangement
reaction of 1,2-dichloroethane are aromatic, as suggested by the larger negative
NICS(0) values of -22.2 ppm (Fig. 4h) [63]. In addition, the 6MR transition state in the
double-group transfer reaction (rearrangement of syn-sesquinorbornene) has also
been demonstrated to be aromatic via the negative NICS value of -27.7 ppm (at the
(3,+1) ring critical point of electron density) [64]. It should be noted that the products
and reactants in this rearrangement process are non-aromatic. Interestingly, Algarra
reported an unusual pericyclic reaction that involves an intermolecular S3 transfer
(Fig. 4h), which occurs via a concerted transition state featuring two five-membered
C2S3 fused rings [65]. The calculated NICS at the (3,+1) ring critical points of electron
density and ACID suggest that the two five-membered C2S3 rings are aromatic.
13
As antiaromaticity is a destabilized effect, antiaromatic reactants should exhibit
higher reactivity than nonaromatic or aromatic reactants. With this idea in mind,
some of us recently developed an antiaromaticity-promoted H2 splitting by the
combination of antiaromatic borole and aromatic pyridine into the cyclooctetraene
skeleton [66]. This system can be viewed as FLPs due to the geometric constraints. In
the process of H2 activation, breaking an antiaromatic boron-containing heterocycle
will reduce the reaction barrier whereas reacting with aromatic boron-containing
heterocycle will increase the reaction barrier (Fig. 5a). In contrast, for nonaromatic
and aromatic B/N-substituted cyclooctatetraenes, the activation energies for H 2
splitting were moderately higher. Especially for aromatic reactant, both kinetically
and thermodynamically are unfavourable and the reaction barrier was as high as 36.1
kcal mol-1. This study provides a novel strategy to design FLP systems for the
activation of H2 or other small molecules via antiaromaticity.
14
Fig. 5. Antiaromaticity-destabilized or aromaticity-reduced reactants in reaction
mechanisms. (a) Gibbs energy profile for H2 activation by a boron-containing
heterocycle [66]. Computational method, ωB97x-D27/cc-pVTZ. NICS(1)zz values (in
ppm) computed at the B3LYP/6-311G(d) level. (b) FLP-mediated CO2 and CS2 (in
parentheses) activations [67]. Relative energies (in kcal mol-1) obtained at the
PCM(toluene)-M06-2X/def2-TZVPP//M06-2X/def2-SVP level of theory. (c) Diels−Alder
reaction between pyrazole and cyclic alkyne. Hyper-conjugative antiaromaticity
induced by fluorination accelerates the reactivity [69]. (d) Diels−Alder reactions
between cyclopentadiene and substituted cyclopropenes [71]. Correlation of the
15
endo (green) and exo (red) Diels–Alder reactions activation enthalpy (ΔH‡) with
hyperconjugative aromatic stabilization enthalpy (ΔHASE) of butadiene with
cyclopropenes. The hyperconjugative aromaticity or antiaromaticity of the
cyclopropenes has a great effect on the stereoselectivity. (e) Syn and Anti Diels–Alder
cycloaddition between cyclopentadiene and ethylene [72]. The stereoselectivities for
this reaction were also controlled by hyperconjugative (anti)aromaticity. (f) Excited-
state antiaromaticity triggers nucleophilic addition of MeOH to benzene [74]. (g)
Aromatic Diels–Alder reactions of benzene tuned by geometric distortion and/or
heteroatom substitution [76]. (h) Predictive Aromaticity-based criteria (PAC) for the
Bingel-Hirsch addition to isolated pentagon rule endohedral metallofullerenes [78,79].
Houk and Lewandowski also examined the stereoselectivities for the Diels−Alder
cycloaddition reactions between the substituted cyclopropenes and cyclopentadiene
(Fig. 5d) [71]. They found that the hyperconjugative aromaticity or antiaromaticity of
the cyclopropenes has a great effect on the reactivity. For example, the endo
stereoselectivity and reactivity were increased by introducing a σ-donor substituent
at the C3 position due to antiaromatic character of cyclopropene ring caused by
pseudo four electrons, whereas the acceptor substituents had the opposite effect.
The antiaromatic character was confirmed by the negative aromatic stabilization
enthalpy (e.g., -2.8 kcal mol-1 for 3-silylcyclopropene). Therefore, σ-donors destabilize
the antiaromatic cyclopropene ring and the reactivity is enhanced.
Benzene is the most typical aromatic molecule in the electronic ground state,
however, it is antiaromatic in the lowest S1 excited state according to Baird’s rule.
Therefore, the antiaromatic benzene in the excited state could be activated.
Recently, Ottosson and co-workers reported that an excited-state antiaromaticity
triggers nucleophilic addition of benzene to synthesize a series of substituted
bicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-enes (Fig. 5f) [74]. In addition, the excited-state antiaromaticity
triggered reaction could be also extended to other 6π-electron heterocycles, such as
silabenzene and pyridinium, leading to the formation of three-dimensional molecular
16
scaffolds. The excited-state aromaticity also affects the ring inversion of a pair of
molecules with thiophene-fused chiral [4n]annulenes [75].
Some of us found that the different aromaticities of the 5MRs and 6MRs of
fullerene C60 have a significant impact on the energy barriers and regioselectivity of
Diels-Alder, 1,3-dipolar, and carbene cycloadditions, which can take place over the
[6,6] and [5,6]-bonds of C60 [78,79]. For example, the aromaticity of the 6-MRs in C60
decreases when the negative charge [78] or the spin [79] of C60 increases, whereas
the 5MRs become more aromatic. Therefore, for the Diels–Alder reaction between
negatively charged or high-spin C60 and cyclopentadiene, addition to a [5,6] bond,
which breaks the aromaticity of three 6MRs and only one 5MR, becomes more
favorable than an addition to a [6,6] bond, which breaks the aromaticity of two 6-
MRs and two 5-MRs (Fig. 5h). Moreover, predictive aromaticity criteria was
developed for the regioselectivity Bingel-Hirsch (BH) addition to isolated pentagon
rule (IPR) endohedral metallofullerenes (EMFs) [ 80 ]. The BH addition is a
cyclopropanation reaction where a fullerene and diethyl bromomalonate in the
presence of a strong base such as 1,8-diazabicycloundec-7-ene (DBU) react to
produce a methanofullerene or a fulleroid. In the first step of the reaction
mechanism, the base abstracts the acidic proton of the malonate derivative to
generate a carbanion or enolate. Then this carbanion nucleophilically attacks the
fullerene, thus generating a new carbanion with charge localized at the cage. In the
final step, bromide is displaced in a nucleophilic substitution S N2 reaction causing an
intramolecular three-membered ring (3MR) closure. The regioselectivity patterns for
the BH addition on IPR EMFs can be predicted using a set of aromaticity-based
criteria, the so-called Predictive Aromaticity Criteria (PAC) (Fig. 5h). The PAC criteria
identify the lowest energy intermediates and transition states for a given IPR EMF
from the initial fullerene structure. The most aromatic (and therefore lowest in
energy) intermediates lead to the lowest activation barriers for the BH addition.
Finally, Chen and co-workers found that the aromaticity or antiaromaticity of the
transition metal macrocyclic complexes could have a remarkable effect on their
17
oxygen reduction reaction activity [81]. Macrocycles with antiaromaticity could
enhance the activity of metal centers.
18
reaction of borafluorenereacted with alkynes [83]. Computational method,
PCM(dichloromethane)-D3-M05-2X/6-311++G(d,p)//M05-2X/6-31G(d) for C, H, B,
and F, 6-311++G(d,p) for Cl, and LanL2DZ for Si. (c) Aromatic intermediate 101a in CO2
reduction [84]. (d) Gibbs energy profile for the N2 activation by NHC-borole-based FLP
[85]. Computational method, ωB97X-D/cc-pVTZ//ωB97X-D/cc-pVDZ. (e) Gibbs energy
profile for the N2 activation by FLPs [86].
Braunschweig, Lin and co-workers reported the reaction of boroles with alkynes
to generate boranorbornadiene, borepin and/or boracyclohexadiene, respectively, by
DFT studies (Fig.6b) [83]. Among them, they found that the formation of borepin by
the reaction of borafluorene with alkynes was due to the propensity to maintain its
aromaticity, with a reaction barrier and reaction energy of 22.2 and -21.5 kcal mol-1,
respectively. Boranorbornadiene 97 was not observed in this reaction due to the
unfavourable dearomatization.
Some of us predicted via DFT calculations that replacing the highly active
methyleneborane by tri-coordinated boron species can be also used for N2 fixation
(Fig. 6d) [85]. The Gibbs activation energy (G0ǂ) and overall Gibbs reaction energy for
N2 activation via NHC-borole-based FLPs were 21.2 and -61.7 kcal mol-1, respectively,
indicating that the N2 activation could become thermodynamically favorable and
kinetically feasible. Further study shows that aromaticity plays a crucial role in this
process. The newly formed 5MR (A) and 6MR (B) in product 104 possess significantly
negative NICS(1)zz values of -19.2 and -17.4 ppm, respectively, suggesting aromaticity
in both rings.
19
indicating that aromaticity plays a crucial role in stabilization of the product. This
study further highlights great potential of metal-free FLPs for N2 activation.
20
A: -26.9 ppm, B: -15.3 ppm, and C: -15.6 ppm) further verify the aromaticity in
metallapentalenopyrazine [96].
22
23
Fig. 7. Metalla-aromaticity-stabilized products in reaction mechanisms. (a) Syntheses and
aromaticity evaluation of aromatic metallapentalyne and metallapentalene
derivatives [92,93]. (b) Syntheses and aromaticity evaluation of polycyclic metalla-
aromatics [94]. Computational method, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p). NICS values given in
ppm. (c) Aromaticity-promoted [2+2+2] cycloaddition reaction of a metal−carbyne
complex with nitriles [96]. Computational method, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)(LanL2DZ). (d)
Gibbs energy profiles for cycloaddition reactions of 4-anisyl azide and osmapentalyne
[98]. Computational method, PCM(dichloromethane)-B3LYP-D3BJ/6-
311++G(d,p)(LANL2TZ). Selected bond lengths given in Å. The NICS(1)zz values of
metal-bridgehead tetracyclic complexes. Computational method, B3LYP/6-
311++G(d,p)(LANL2TZ). [Os]' = Os(PH 3)2. (e) -aromaticity promoted the CC triple
bond activation [99]. Computational method, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (LanL2DZ). (f)
Gibbs energy profiles of the aromaticity-driven cyclization reaction of the multiyne
chain with OsCl2(PPh3)3 [100]. Computational method, PCM(dichloromethane)-
TPSS/6-31G(d)(SDD)//B3LYP/6-31G(d)(SDD). (g) Ring contraction of
metallacyclobutadiene to metallacyclopropene driven by π- and σ-Aromaticity Relay
[102]. Computational method, PCM(dichloromethane)-TPSS/6-
31G(d)(SDD)//B3LYP/6-31G(d)(SDD).
8. Limitation
However, there are still some limitations for the application of aromaticity in the
small-molecule activation. First, cyclic structures are required for a reactant,
intermediate, transition state or product in a given reaction as aromaticity is used to
describe the mobility of electrons in a cyclic species, limiting the types of reactants
or products to some extent. Secondly, although antiaromaticity in a reactant might
promote a reaction, preparation of highly reactive reactants demands harsh synthetic
and storage conditions. Thirdly, some aromaticity indices such as HOMA or FLU
cannot be applied along a reaction coordinate of a given cycloaddition and others,
like NICS, are not reliable in points of space close to transition metals [103]. Fourthly,
the utilization of the strategy by improving the aromaticity of the transition state to
reduce a reaction barrier still remains a major challenge as both aromaticity and
transition state cannot be probed experimentally. It should be also noted that the
interaction involving bond cleavage and formation in most transition states is
particularly weak. It is no wonder that these transition states in some classical
pseudocyclic reactions were considered to be nonaromatic due to lack of adequate
electron delocalization when benzene is used as a reference [104].
24
chemistry. On the other hand, aromaticity is one of the most important and
fundamental concepts that has been frequently discussed. Here, we devote ourselves
to a summary of aromaticity as a key factor in the reaction mechanisms. The strategy
can be mainly classified into two modes: the first one is to reduce the antiaromaticity
of the reactant whereas the second one is to enable the aromaticity in a transition
state or an intermediate or a product. Hyperconjugative antiaromaticity is usually
employed in the first mode by tuning the substituents. In addition, aromaticity gained
or antiaromaticity reduced along the reaction coordinate is the most common
strategy, which is widely used by experimental and theoretical chemists. Note that
releasing antiaromaticity in an excited arene is another less developed strategy [105]
to promote a reaction. Developing metalla-aromatics as a catalyst in organic
synthesis could be another direction and some examples have been demonstrated to
display robust catalytic activity for metathesis [106] and selective difunctionalization
of unactivated aliphatic alkenes [107]. With the rapid development of computational
resource, quantum chemical calculations will make significant contributions to
aromaticity-driven reactions by rationalizing the proposed reaction mechanisms and
predicting new and novel reactions or catalysts via theoretical design and
computational screening for experimental validation.
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the National Science Foundation of China (22073079, 22025105
and 21873079), the Ministry of Education of China (H20200504) and the Top-Notch
Young Talents Program of China is gratefully acknowledged. M.S. thanks the
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain (project PID2020-113711GB-I00) and the
Generalitat de Catalunya (project 2017SGR39).
Author contributions
Q.Z. D.C. and S.C. drafted the paper. J.Z., M.S., and L.Z. refined the text. All authors
discussed the results and contributed to the preparation of the final manuscript
References
[1] Y. Tian, G. Zhu, Porous Aromatic Frameworks (PAFs), Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 8934–8986.
[2] I. Fernández., Aromaticity: Modern Methods and Applications, 1st edn. (Elsevier, 2021).
25
[3] E. Matito, J. Poater, M. Solà, et al., Aromaticity and Chemical Reactivity, in: P. K.
Chattaraj (Ed.), Chemical Reactivity Theory: A Density Functional View, CRC Press, Boca
Ratón, 2009, pp. 419–438.
[4] H. Zimmerman, Möbius-Hückel concept in organic chemistry. Application of organic
molecules and reactions, Acc. Chem. Res. 4 (1971) 272–280.
[5] K. N. Houk, F. Liu, Z. Yang, et al., Evolution of the Diels–Alder reaction mechanism since
the 1930s: Woodward, Houk with Woodward, and the influence of computational
chemistry on understanding cycloadditions, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2020) 12660–
12681.
[6] M. G. Evans, The activation energies of reactions involving conjugated systems, Trans.
Faraday Soc. 35 (1939) 824–834.
[7] P. v. R. Schleyer, J. I. Wu, F. P. Cossío, et al., Aromaticity in transition structures, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 4909–4921.
[8] N. C. Baird, Quantum Organic Photochemistry. II.Resonance and Aromaticity in the
Lowest 3ππ* State of Cyclic Hydrocarbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 4941–4948.
[9] H. Ottosson, Exciting excited-state aromaticity, Nat. Chem. 4 (2012) 969–971.
[10] H. Ottosson, B, Durbeej, M. Solà, Excited-state aromaticity and antiaromaticity special
issue, J Phys Org Chem. 36 (2023) e4468.
26
[15] B. Oruganti, P. P. Kalapos, V. Bhargav, et al., Photoinduced Changes in Aromaticity
Facilitate Electrocyclization of Dithienylbenzene Switches, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020)
13941–13953.
[16] O. E. Bakouri, J. R. Smith, H. Ottosson, Strategies for Design of Potential Singlet Fission
Chromophores Utilizing a Combination of Ground-State and Excited-State Aromaticity
Rules, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 5602-5617.
[17] Y. M. Sung, J. Oh, W.-Y. Cha, et al., Control and switching of aromaticity in various all-
aza-expanded porphyrins: Spectroscopic and theoretical analyses, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017)
2257–2312.
[18] Y. Su, R. Kinjo, Small molecule activation by boron-containing heterocycles, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 48 (2019) 3613–3659.
[19+ R. Herges, Topology in chemistry: designing Möbius molecules, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006)
4820–4842.
[20] G. C. Welch, R. R. S. Juan, J. D. Masuda, et al., Reversible, metal-free hydrogen
activation, Science 314 (2006) 1124–1126.
[21] A. Brand, W. Uhl, Sterically constrained bicyclic phosphines: A class of fascinating
compounds suitable for application in small molecule activation and coordination
chemistry, Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 1391–1404.
[22] P. P. Power, Interaction of multiple bonded and unsaturated heavier main group
compounds with hydrogen, ammonia, olefins, and related molecules, Acc. Chem. Res. 44
(2011) 627–637.
[23] M. Soleilhavoup, G. Bertrand, Cyclic(alkyl)(amino)carbenes (CAACs): Stable carbenes on
the rise, Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 256–266.
[24] N. Martín, L. T. Scott, Challenges in aromaticity: 150 years after Kekulé's benzene,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 6397–6400.
[25] M. Solà, Why aromaticity is a suspicious concept? Why? Front. Chem. 5 (2017) 22.
[26] J. Zhu, Open questions on aromaticity in organometallics, Commun. Chem. 3
(2020) 161.
[27] G. Merino, M. Solà, I. Fernández, et al., Aromaticity: Quo Vadis, Chem. Sci. (2023) DOI:
10.1039/d2sc04998h.
27
[28] D. W. Szczepanik, M. Solà, M. Andrzejak, et al., The role of the long-range exchange
corrections in the description of electron delocalization in aromatic species, J. Comput.
Chem. 38 (2017) 1640–1654.
[29] D. W. Szczepanik, M. Andrzejak, K. Dyduch, et al., A uniform approach to the description
of multicenter bonding, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16 (2014) 20514–20523.
[30] F. Feixas, E. Matito, J. Poater, et al., Quantifying aromaticity with electron delocalisation
measures, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 6434–6451.
[31] Z.-F. Chen, C. S. Wannere, C. Corminboeuf, et al., Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 3842–3888.
[32] S. Klod, E. Kleinpeter, Ab initio calculation of the anisotropy effect of multiple bonds
and the ring current effect of arenes—application in conformational and configurational
analysis, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2001) 1893–1898.
[33] D. Geuenich, K. Hess, K. Köhler, et al., Anisotropy of the induced current density (ACID),
a general method to quantify and visualize electronic delocalization, Chem. Rev. 105
(2005) 3758–3772.
[34] H. Fliegl, S. Taubert, O. Lehtonen, et al., The gauge including magnetically induced
current method, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 20500–20518.
[35] C. Foroutan-Nejad, J. Vícha, A. Ghosh, Relativity or aromaticity? A first-principles
perspective of chemical shifts in osmabenzene and osmapentalene derivatives, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (2020) 10863–10869.
[36] T. M. Krygowski, Crystallographic studies of inter- and intramolecular interactions
reflected in aromatic character of .pi.-electron systems, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33
(1993) 70–78.
[37] J. Zhu, K. An, P. v. R. Schleyer, Evaluation of triplet aromaticity by the isomerization
stabilization energy, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 2442–2445.
[38] D. Singh, W. R. Buratto, J. F. Torres, et al., Activation of dinitrogen by polynuclear metal
complexes, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 5517–5581.
[39] M.-A. Légaré, G. Bélanger-Chabot, R. D. Dewhurst, et al., Nitrogen fixation and
reduction at boron, Science 359 (2018) 896–900.
28
[40] M.-A. Légaré, G. Bélanger-Chabot, M. Rang, et al., One-pot, room-temperature
conversion of dinitrogen to ammonium chloride at a main-group element, Nat. Chem. 12
(2020) 1076–1080.
[41] J. Zhu, Rational design of a carbon-boron frustrated Lewis pair for metal-free dinitrogen
activation, Chem. Asian J. 14 (2019) 1413–1417.
[42] Z. Xi, K. Sato, Y. Gao, et al., Unprecedented double C−C bond cleavage of a
cyclopentadienyl ligand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 9568–9569.
[43] C. H. Suresh, N. Koga, Aromaticity-driven rupture of CN triple and CC double bonds:
Mechanism of the reaction between Cp2Ti(C4H4) and RCN, Organometallics 25 (2006)
1924–1931.
[44] T. R. Hoye, B. Baire, D. Niu, et al., The hexadehydro-Diels–Alder reaction, Nature 490
(2012) 208–212.
[45] D. Niu, P. H. Willoughby, B. P. Woods, et al., Alkane desaturation by concerted double
hydrogen atom transfer to benzyne, Nature 501 (2013) 531–534.
[46] I. Fernández, F. P. Cossío, Interplay between aromaticity and strain in double group
transfer reactions to 1,2-benzyne, J. Comput. Chem. 37 (2016) 1265–1273.
[47] D. Chen, D. Zhuang, Y. Zhao, et al., Reaction mechanisms of iron(iii) catalyzed carbonyl–
olefin metatheses in 2,5- and 3,5-hexadienals: Significant substituent and aromaticity
effects, Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 3917–3924.
[48] D. Zhuang, A. M. Rouf, Y. Li, et al., Aromaticity-promoted CO2 capture by P/N-based
frustrated Lewis pairs: A theoretical study, Chem. Asian J. 15 (2020) 266–272.
[49] Y. Li, D. Zhuang, R. Qiu, et al., Aromaticity-promoted CS2 activation by heterocycle-
bridged P/N-FLPs: a comparative DFT study with CO2 capture, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24
(2022) 2521–2526.
[50] W. W. Chen, A. Cunillera, D. Chen, et al., Iodane-guided ortho C−H allylation, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 20201–20207.
[51] O. Eisenstein, J. Milani, R. N. Perutz, Selectivity of C-H activation and competition
between C−H and C−F bond activation at fluorocarbons, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 8710–
8753.
29
[52] T. Shen, Q. Xie, Y. Li, et al., Aromaticity-promoted C−F bond activation in rhodium
complex: A facile tautomerization, Chem. Asian J. 14 (2019) 1937–1940.
[53] Q. Xie, Y. Zhao, D. Chen, et al., Probing reaction mechanism of [1,5]-migration in
pyrrolium and pyrrole derivatives: Activation of a stronger bond in electropositive groups
becomes easier, Chem. Asian J. 14 (2019) 2604–2610.
[54] I. V. Alabugin, M. Manoharan, B. Breiner, et al., Control of kinetics and thermodynamics
of [1,5]-shifts by aromaticity: A view through the prism of Marcus theory, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 125 (2003) 9329–9342.
[55] J. Clarke, P. W. Fowler, S. Gronert, et al., Effect of ring size and migratory groups on [1,n]
suprafacial shift reactions. Confirmation of aromatic and antiaromatic transition-state
character by ring-current analysis, J. Org. Chem. 81 (2016) 8777–8788.
[56] Q. Zhu, L. Lin, A. M. Rouf, et al., Reaction mechanisms on unusual 1,2-migrations of N-
heterocyclic carbene-ligated transition metal complexes, Chem. Asian J. 14 (2019) 3313–
3319.
[57] Y. Li, J. Zhu, Achieving a favorable activation of the C–F bond over the C–H Bond in five-
and six-membered ring complexes by a coordination and aromaticity dually driven
strategy, Organometallics 40 (2021) 3397–3407.
[58] C. Castro, W. L. Karney, M. A. Valencia, et al., Möbius aromaticity in [12]annulene:
Cis−trans isomerization via twist-coupled bond shifting, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005)
9704–9705.
[59] H. Jiao, P. v. R. Schleyer, A detailed theoretical analysis of the 1,7-sigmatropic hydrogen
shift: The Möbius character of the eight-electron transition structure, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 32 (1993) 1763–1765.
[60] H. S. Rzepa, Double-twist Möbius aromaticity in a 4n + 2 electron electrocyclic reaction,
Chem. Commun. (2005) 5220–5222.
[61] M. Mauksch, S. B. Tsogoeva, A preferred disrotatory 4n electron Möbius aromatic
transition state for a thermal electrocyclic reaction, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009)
2959–2963.
30
[62+ A. Q. Cusumano, W. A. Goddard III, B. M. Stoltz, The transition metal catalyzed *π2s +
π2s + σ2s + σ2s+ pericyclic reaction: Woodward–Hoffmann rules, aromaticity, and
electron flow, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 19033–19039.
[63] J.-W. Zou, C.-H. Yu, Dyotropic rearrangements of dihalogenated hydrocarbons: A
density functional theory study, J. Phys. Chem. A 108 (2004) 5649–5654.
[64] I. Fernández, M. A. Sierra, F. P. Cossío, In-plane aromaticity in double group transfer
reactions, J. Org. Chem. 72 (2007) 1488–1491.
[65] A. G. Algarra, Computational insights into the S3 transfer reaction: A special case of
double group transfer reaction featuring bicyclically delocalized aromatic transition state
geometries, J. Comput. Chem. 38 (2017) 1966–1973.
[66] D. Zhuang, Y. Li, J. Zhu, Antiaromaticity-promoted activation of dihydrogen with borole
fused cyclooctatetraene frustrated Lewis pairs: A density functional theory study,
Organometallics 39 (2020) 2636–2641.
[67] J. J. Cabrera-Trujillo, I. Fernández, Aromaticity can enhance the reactivity of P-
donor/borole frustrated Lewis pairs, Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 675–678.
[68] J. J. Cabrera-Trujillo, I. Fernández, Aromaticity-enhanced reactivity of geminal frustrated
Lewis pairs, Chem. Commun. 58 (2022) 6801.
31
[73] S. Winstein, M. Shatavsky, C. Norton, et al., 7-Norbornenyl and 7-norbornyl cations, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 4183–4184.
[74] T. Slanina, R. Ayub, J. Toldo, et al., Impact of excited-state antiaromaticity relief in a
fundamental benzene photoreaction leading to substituted bicyclo[3.1.0]hexenes, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 10942–10954.
[75] M. Ueda, K. Jorner, Y. M. Sung, et al., Energetics of Baird aromaticity supported by
inversion of photoexcited chiral [4n]annulene derivatives, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 346.
[76] A. K. Narsaria, T. A. Hamlin, K. Lammertsma, et al., Dual activation of aromatic Diels–
Alder reactions, Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 9902–9912.
[77] M. Culka, S. G. Huwiler, M. Boll, et al., Breaking Benzene Aromaticity—Computational
Insights into the Mechanism of the Tungsten-Containing Benzoyl-CoA Reductase, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 14488–14500.
[ 78 ] M. Garcia-Borràs, S. Osuna, M. Swart, et al., Electrochemical control of the
regioselectivity in the exohedral functionalization of C60: the role of aromaticity, Chem.
Commun. 49 (2013) 1220–1222.
[79] O. E. Bakouri, M. Garcia-Borràs, R. M. Girón, et al., On the regioselectivity of the Diels–
Alder cycloaddition to C60 in high spin states, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 (2018) 11577–
11585.
[80] M. Garcia-Borràs, M. R. Cerón, S. Osuna, et al., The regioselectivity of Bingel–Hirsch
cycloadditions on isolated pentagon rule endohedral metallofullerenes, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 55 (2016) 2374–2377.
[81] Y. Ni, Y. Lu, K. Zhang, et al., Aromaticity/antiaromaticity effect on activity of transition
metal macrocyclic complexes towards electrocatalytic oxygen reduction, ChemSusChem
14 (2021) 1835–1839.
[82] K. Xiao, Y. Zhao, J. Zhu, et al., Hyperconjugative aromaticity and protodeauration
reactivity of polyaurated indoliums, Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 5639.
[83] Z. Wang, Y. Zhou, J.-X. Zhang, et al., DFT studies on the reactions of boroles with alkynes,
Chem. Eur. J. 24 (2018) 9612–9621.
32
[84] Z. Lu, H. Hausmann, S. Becker, et al., Aromaticity as stabilizing element in the bidentate
activation for the catalytic reduction of carbon dioxide, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015)
5332–5335.
[85] A. M. Rouf, C. Dai, F. Xu, et al., Dinitrogen activation by tricoordinated boron species: A
systematic design, Adv. Theory Simul. 3 (2020) 1900205.
[86] A. M. Rouf, Y. Huang, S. Dong, et al., Systematic design of a frustrated Lewis pair
containing methyleneborane and carbene for dinitrogen activation, Inorg. Chem. 60
(2021) 5598–5606.
[87] J. R. Bleeke, Metallabenzenes, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 1205–1228.
[89] D. Chen, Y. Hua, H. Xia, Metallaaromatic chemistry: History and development, Chem.
Rev. 120 (2020) 12994–13086.
[90] Y. Zhang, C. Yu, Z. Huang, et al., Metalla-aromatics: Planar, Nonplanar, and Spiro, Acc.
Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 2323−2333.
33
[97] A. Roglans, A. Pla-Quintana, M. Solà, Mechanistic studies of transition-metal-
catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition reactions, Chem. Rev. 121 (2021) 1894–1979.
[98] Z. Lu, Q. Zhu, Y. Cai, et al., Access to tetracyclic aromatics with bridgehead metals via
metalla-click reactions, Sci. Adv. 6 (2020) eaay2535.
[ 99 ] Z. Chu, G. He, X. Cheng, et al., Synthesis and Characterization of
Cyclpropaosmanaphthalenes Containing a Fused σ-Aromatic Metallacyclopropene Unit,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 9174–9178.
[100] Q. Zhuo, J. Lin, Y. Hua, et al., Multiyne chains chelating osmium via three metalcarbon σ
bonds, Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1912.
[ 101 ] Z. Lu, C. Zhu, Y. Cai, et al., Metallapentalenofurans and lactone-fused
metallapentalynes, Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 6426–6431.
[102] K. Zhuo, Y. Liu, K. Ruan, et al., Ring contraction of metallacyclobutadiene to
metallacyclopropene driven by π- and σ-aromaticity relay, Nat. Synth (2022) DOI:
10.1038/s44160-022-00194-2.
[103] C. Foroutan-Nejad, Is NICS a reliable aromaticity index for transition metal clusters?
Theor. Chem. Acc. 134 (2015) 8.
34
Qin Zhu received her B.S. degree from Zhengzhou University in 2012 and earned her M.S. degree
(Supervisor: Prof. Haiping Xia) and Ph.D. degree (Supervisor: Prof. Jun Zhu) from Xiamen
University in 2015 and 2020, respectively. From 2020 to 2022, she worked as a postdoctor at Nanjing
University (Supervisor: Prof. Jing Ma). Currently, she works at Nanjing University of Posts and
Telecommunications. Her research interests focus on the inert bond activation and machine learning
models for data-driven material designs.
Jun Zhu is currently a professor at Xiamen University. He obtained the B.S and Ph.D. degrees from
Xiamen University and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in 2000 and 2007,
respectively. Then he moved to Hong Kong University and Uppsala University for the postdoctoral
study. In 2010, he joined the Department of Chemistry at Xiamen University. His research group
(http://junzhu.chem8.org) focuses mainly on aromaticity and small molecule activation including
dinitrogen. His motto is “Enjoy chemistry & life to explore the unknown world”.
Declaration of interests
☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be
considered as potential competing interests:
35