AOM 2023 001 Tuy A
AOM 2023 001 Tuy A
AOM 2023 001 Tuy A
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
REGIONAL OFFICE NO. VIII
LGAS C – Leyte II and Biliran Province
Provincial Satellite Auditing Office (PSAO)
Baybay City, Leyte
MICHELLE L. EFREN
Municipal Accountant
We have audited some of the Barangay transactions for Calendar Years 2019,
2020 and 2021 and 2022 and observed the following deficiencies:
1.2. Pertinent provisions in Chapter VII of the Manual on the Barangay Financial
Management of Barangays provide:
Xxx
7.1.6 Property/Equipment Card (PEC), see Annex 26.1, shall be maintained for
all property and equipment of the barangay by the BT.
7.1.18 The barangay shall conduct an annual physical inventory of all supplies,
property and equipment of the barangay.
Xxx
The Inventory Committee, upon the completion of the physical count, shall
prepare three copies of Report on Inventory of Property and Equipment (RIPE),
as shown in Annex 30 and shall be approved by the PB. The RIPE shall be
distributed as follows:
The RIPE shall be the basis of the C/M Accountant for reconciling the results of
inventory with the PPE accounts.
The RIPE shall be the basis of the BT for reconciling the equipment covered by
PAR and the PECs on file and the ICS for the small items considered as
inventories.
1.3. As of December 31, 2022, the Barangay’s financial statements showed the total,
PPE account of ₱3,867,696.05 representing 59% of its total assets of ₱6,552,894.38
The details of the total PPE account are presented in Table 1.
1.4. The required Subsidiary Ledgers or the PPE Ledger Cards and
Property/Equipment Cards were not maintained by the Municipal Accountant
and the Barangay Treasurer, respectively. The absence of the PPE Ledger Cards
made the confirmation of the balance of the PPE account impossible. Likewise,
without the Property/Equipment Cards, the Barangay Treasurer will have
difficulty in filling-out columns 1 to 6 of the RIPE which will be the basis of the
Inventory Team in the conduct of the physical count.
1.5. Due to the aforementioned deficiencies, the valuation of the properties that
constitute the Property, Plant and Equipment account amounting to
₱3,867,696.05 could not be established, thus affecting the fair presentation of the
account in the FS.
1.6. We recommend that the Municipal Accountant maintain and update the
prescribed PPELC and reconcile these with property records of the
Barangay Treasurer.
2.1. Section 4.4 of COA Circular 2012-002 states “The unexpended LDRRMF shall
accrue to a special trust fund solely for the purpose of supporting disaster risk
reduction and management activities of the Local Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council (LDRRMC) within the next five years.
2.3. In CY 2022, the barangay appropriated a total of ₱127,412.35 for its LDRRMF. In
addition, it has a balance of ₱195,696.30 from previous year’s unexpended
balance, while there was no disbursements made during the year charged to the
fund. Details are shown in table 2.
Disbursement
PPA Appropriation s Balance
Current 30%QRF 38,223.70 - 38,223.70
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 4 of 17
Year 70% NO
LDRRMFIP 89,188.65 - 89,188.65
Subtotal Current Year 127,412.35 - 127,412.35
Previous Years
Unexpended 195,696.30 - 195,696.30
Total 323,108.65 - 323,108.65
3.0. Disbursements totaling ₱397,812.00 in CY 2019 and 2020 were paid from
current and prior year’s unexpended DRRMF despite not having an
approved LDRRMF Investment Plan for CYs 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 and
not having an updated LDRRMFIP for Special Trust Fund for previous
years unexpended DRRMF, contrary to Sections 5.1.2 and 5.1.3.2 of COA
Circular 2012-002, thus, resulted to irregular expenditures.
3.1. Section 5.1.2 of COA Circular 2012-002 states that, a Local Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund Investment Plan (LDRRMFIP) for the DRRM
program shall be prepared annually. It shall present the 30% allocation for QRF in
lump sum and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and preparedness
with details as to projects and activities to be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also
include under a separate caption, the list of projects and activities charged to
the unexpended LDRRMF of previous years.
3.2. Section 5.1.3.2 of the same circular states that the release and use of LDRRMF
shall be supported by LDRRMFIP for projects and activities listed in the
approved plan as incorporated in the local development plan and annual work and
financial plan
3.4. It was further noted by the Audit Team that the Barangay still had a balance of
₱323,235.45 out of its prior years’ LDRRM Fund as of December 31, 2018.
However, it was observed that there was no LDRRMFIP prepared for CYs 2019,
2020, 2021 and 2022. Consequently, the current years appropriation and the
unexpended balances of prior years’ cannot be used in the absence of the
LDRRMFIP which should have indicated the PPAs for which said current and
prior years’ balances will be used for.
3.5. In addition, audit disclosed that there were disbursements in CY 2019 and CY
2020 that were charged against the unspent 2017 DRRMF, there were also
disbursements in CY 2020 that were charged against the 2019 unspent DRRMF
with a total of ₱397,812.00. Both disbursements were supported with a
LDRRMFIP for special trust fund for unspent prior years DRRMF, however, the
said LDRRMFIP should have been updated yearly for its disbursements to be
valid since disbursements were made not on the year the plan was made. (see
details in table 4)
Check Charged to
Date Particulars Charged to Total Remarks
No. Previous
Current
Years
Appropriation
unexepended
Purchase of
Distaster
Equipments(rec
hargeable
Charged to
flashligh,
LDRRMFIP
extension
STF for
ladder and 49,927.0
unexpended
11/29/19 1156190 whistle) 49,927.00 0
2017
Purchase of 3
DRRMF-but
box first aid kit,
there was no
15pcs. boots,
updated
and 15 pcs. 31,350.0
LDRRMFIP
12/20/19 1156198 Raincoats 31,350.00 0
for STF at the
Purchase of
beginning of
3pcs.Handheld
CY 2019
radio ,
3pcs.emergency
lights and 1 pc 43,800.0
12/20/19 1156199 megaphone 43,800.00 0
Purchase of '1pc Charged to
Stereo mixing LDRRMFIP
amplifier , 4 STF for
pcs. Trumpa , 1 unexpended
pc Usb , 1 2017
pc.paging DRRMF-but
microhone , 40 there was no
mt flatcord 1 updated
unit portable LDRRMFIP
speaker , 1 unit for STF at the
AVR @ and 1 49,500.0 beginning of
03/17/20 1156237 lot service fee 49,500.00 0 CY 2020
No
1 pc. Spine 8,675.0 LDRRMFIP
03/17/20 1156238 Board 8,675.00 0 CY 2020
Charged to
LDRRMFIP
STF for
Relief Goods 200,000.0 unexpended
03/24/20 1156245 (100 sack rice) 200,000.00 0 2019
DRRMF-but
Medical there was no
Equipment(face updated
mask, Alcohol, LDRRMFIP
gloves, ascorbic 14,560.0 for STF at the
04/15/20 1156248 acid 14,560.00 0 beginning of
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 7 of 17
Amount
Check Charged to
Date Particulars Charged to Total Remarks
No. Previous
Current
Years
Appropriation
unexepended
CY 2020
397,812.0
TOTAL 8,675.00 389,137.00 0
3.7. Without an approved LDRRMFIP for the current year and previous year’s
DRRMF balances, the Chairman Committee on Appropriation had no basis for
certifying the existence of available appropriations authorized for the purpose.
Thus, disbursements charged against LDRRMF were irregular. In addition, the
absence of an approved plan denotes that the procured items and other activities
were not approved by the other members of the LDRRM Council and based only
on arbitrary decision of the requesting officials.
3.8. We recommend that the BDRRMO, through the Punong Barangay, convene
the LDRRM Council and prepare the LDRRMFIP which also includes PPAs
to be paid from previous years’ unexpended DRRMF annually as basis for
the use of the LDRRMF based on the priority programs, projects and
activities outlined in COA Circular 2012-002.
4.1. DBM-DOF-DILG Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1 dated November 24, 2020
provides the revised guidelines on the appropriation and utilization of the 20% of
the annual internal revenue allotment for development projects. The JMC was
issued to increase the responsiveness of the guidelines and promote greater
autonomy, transparency and accountability in the LGUs’ appropriation and
utilization of their respective 20% DF. Pertinent sections of the subject
Memorandum Circular are as follows:
b) Section 3.2 – The LGUs are enjoined to observe the following policies and
guidelines in the appropriation and utilization of the 20% DF:
4.2. During the conduct of our audit, it was noted that the Barangay had appropriated
projects for 20% Development Fund amounting to ₱321,113.00, ₱365,164.80,
₱390,613.60 and ₱508,249.40 for CY 2019, CY 2020, CY 2021 and CY 2022,
respectively. For the 4-year period, the 20% DF appropriation totaled to
₱1,585,140.80. The Barangay had also its beginning balance in the Fund from CY
2018 amounting ₱308,825.89. The said annual appropriations were for the
following projects:
4.3. Review of utilization revealed that out of the available appropriations the
barangay disbursed a total amount of ₱597,813.96 to implement the Concreting
Pathway Phase I funded under 20% Development Fund from CYs 2018 to 2019
amounting ₱597,813.96, per check number 1237926 dated November 25, 2020
under the contractor Victoria Development Venture Corp.
4.5. Review of the status of implementation of projects of the barangay disclosed that
three projects identified and budgeted in CYs 2020 to 2022 totaling
₱1,264,027.80 were not implemented.
4.6. We recommend that the Punong Barangay implement all the projects
appropriated under 20% Development Fund so that funds are utilized to its
optimum to help achieve the desirable socio-economic development and
environmental outcomes of the Barangay.
5.0. No funds were appropriated in the CY 2019 to 2022 budget of the barangay
for the implementation of programs, projects and activities for the protection
of children, contrary to Republic Act No. 9344, thus protection of children’s
rights within the barangay is not strengthened.
5.1. Republic Act No. 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006) adopts as a
policy the protection of the interests of children and promotes their physical,
moral, spiritual, intellectual and social well-being. The Act also recognizes the
rights of children to assistance, proper care and nutrition and special protection
from all forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty and exploitation, and other conditions
prejudicial to their development.
5.2. Section 15 of the said Act mandates the creation of Local Councils for the
Protection of Children (LCPC) in all levels of local government. It provides
further that 1% of the internal revenue allotment (IRA) of barangays,
municipalities and cities, shall be allocated for the strengthening and
implementation of the LCPC.
5.3. Our perusal of the Annual Budget of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for the implementation of programs, projects and activities (PPA)
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 11 of 17
intended for the Council for the protection and well-being of children although the
barangay has established and created their own LCPC. Based on the estimated
IRA for the noted budget years, the following could have been appropriated for
LCPC programs and activities:
5.4. Without the necessary budget and plan, the rights, interest and well-being of the
children in the barangay will not be protected, established and strengthened.
5.5. We recommend that the Punong Barangay include in its annual budget an
appropriation equivalent to 1% of its IRA intended for the protection and
welfare of the children in the barangay, identify and implement the
programs, projects and activities using the said fund pursuant to RA 9344.
6.0. No funds were appropriated for programs and projects for Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWD) in CY 2019 to 2022 which should be 1%
of the barangay’s IRA, contrary to DBM and DSWD Joint Circular No.
2003-01 dated April 28, 2003, thus depriving the elderly citizens in the
barangay the full benefits of the programs due them.
6.2. Our perusal of the Annual Budgets of the barangay disclosed that no funds were
appropriated for Senior Citizens and PWDs programs and activities for the
periods CY 2019, CY 2020, 2021 & CY 2022 as shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Fund for Senior Citizens and PWDs Programs/Projects
Particulars CY 2022 CY 2021 CY 2020 CY 2019
6.3. Without the necessary appropriation sanctioned by law, the elderly citizens and
PWDs of the barangay are deprived of the benefits of the programs, which could
have been financed from the said amount.
6.4. We recommend that the Punong Barangay and its Council appropriate funds
in its annual budget for programs and projects benefitting Senior Citizens
and Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) at an amount of no less than 1% of the
annual IRA as required by the Expanded Senior Citizen Act, R.A. No. 9994.
PS limitation
7.1. Section 331 (b) of Republic Act (RA) No. 7160 otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991, states that “The total annual appropriations for
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 13 of 17
personal services of a barangay for one (1) fiscal year shall not exceed fifty-five
percent (55%) of the total annual income actually realized from local sources
during the next preceding fiscal year.”
7.2. DBM Local Budget Circular No. 98 issued on October 14, 2011, prescribed the
guidelines in determining compliance to the personal services (PS) limitation on
local government budgets. Section 4.2 thereof defines Personal Services (PS)
Limitation as the prohibition under Section 331 (b) of the Local Government
Code against appropriating funds for PS in excess of the limits set therein. It
provides further that PS Limitation refers to the amount beyond which no
additional appropriation for PS items is allowed.
7.3. Section 4.6 of the same Circular defines next preceding fiscal year as the fiscal
year that is two (2) years before a budget year. For example, if FY 2011 is the
budget year, the next preceding fiscal year is FY 2009.
7.4. Section 4.3 of the same Circular on the other hand provides items which are
waived in the determination of compliance to the PS limitation in LGU PS
budgets which includes payment of minimum Year-end Bonus of ₱1,000.00 for
the Punong Barangay and P600.00 for other mandatory barangay officials, and
their Cash Gifts.
7.5. Review of the annual budget of the barangay disclosed that appropriations for
Personal Services in CY 2022, 2021, 2020 and CY 2019 exceeded fifty-five
percent (55%) of the total annual income actually realized from local sources
during the next preceding fiscal year. The excess amount is computed in Table 9.
7.6. In addition, actual expenditures for CYs 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019 on personal
services also exceeded the ceiling for the reason that the budget itself for CY 2019
to CY 2022 provided a greater PS appropriation than what was required. Details
on table 10.
Table 10. Excess of Actual PS Expenditure over PS Limitation
2022 2021 2020 2019
1,011,918.0 809,613.7 750,550.3
PS Limitation 55% 5 947,897.14 5 5
Less: Actual PS 951,168.0 876,444.0
Expenditures 1,264,841.00 1,131,236.00 0 0
(252,922.9 (183,338.8 (141,554.2 (125,893.6
Difference 5) 6) 5) 5)
Total PS cost for waived 62,000.0
items 56,400.00 56,400.00 56,400.00 0
Excess (Difference less (196,522.9 (126,938.8 (85,154.2 (63,893.6
waived items) 5) 6) 5) 5)
7.7. The Barangay officials were under the notion that since the budget of the
barangay was already reviewed by the Budget Officer and approved by the
Sangguniang Bayan, their budget was already in consonance with the regulations.
7.10. We further recommend that the barangay council should strive to find ways
to improve collection of revenues from local sources so that the Personal
Services ceiling will correspondingly increase.
8.0. The Barangay Treasurer did not deposit her collections regularly, intact and
on time, contrary to Section 69(1) of PD 1445, COA Circular No. 92-382
dated July 3, 1992 and Section 2.1 of COA Circular No. 97-002 dated
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 15 of 17
February 10, 1997 and the Manual on Financial Management of Barangays,
thus exposing barangay funds to the risk of loss, through misuse and/or
misappropriation.
8.1. Section 69(1) of PD 1445 provides: “Public officers authorized to receive and
collect moneys arising from taxes, revenues, or receipts of any kind shall remit or
deposit intact the full amounts so received and collected by them to the treasury of
the agency concerned and credited to the particular accounts to which the said
moneys belong. The amount of the collections ultimately payable to other
agencies of the government shall thereafter be remitted to the respective
treasuries of these agencies.”
8.2. Section 8 of COA Circular No. 92-382 dated July 3, 1992 issued to implement the
provisions of Republic Act No. 7160 states that all collections shall be deposited
intact with authorized depositories. The practice of retaining part of the
collections as a cash reserve for cash disbursements shall be discontinued.
8.3. Section 2.1 of COA Circular No. 97-002 dated February 10, 1997 also requires
that daily receipts of collections must be deposited intact with the proper bank.
8.4. Section 4.1.13 of the Manual on Financial Management of Barangays states that:
8.5. During the conduct of cash examination, it was noted that for the period July 6,
2019 to December 31, 2022, the Barangay Treasurer did not deposit her
collections regularly. Moreover, comparison of the actual collections and
deposits disclosed that the collections were not deposited intact, as can be seen in
Table 11.
8.6. It can be seen in Table 11 that for most of the time, there is always a variance or
an amount retained in the custody of the Barangay Treasurer at the end of each
month. Also, for the month of August 2019, December 2019, April 2020, June
2020, September 2020, November 2020, January 2021, March 2021 and May
2021, no deposits were made by the Barangay Treasurer despite existence of cash
on hand. This practice exposes government funds to the risk of loss, misuse or
misappropriation.
AOM No. 2023-001 Brgy. Tuy-a, Abuyog, Leyte Page 17 of 17
8.7. We recommend that the Barangay Treasurer deposit the full amount of
collections at the Barangay’s authorized government depository bank daily,
weekly or once the collections reach ₱5,000.00, whichever is applicable.
May we have your comments on the foregoing audit observations within five (5)
calendar days from receipt hereof.
ARNE S. CABIGAS
State Auditor II
OIC- Audit Team Leader
SANTIAGO P. SEÑASE
State Auditor IV
OIC-Supervising Auditor