Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Appraisal Jem

    Uploaded by

    leviraplh14
    This contractual appraisal report evaluates the work performance and attitude of Jemalyn B. Tarrobal from July 1 to December 31, 2023. The report rates her technical skills, efficiency, organization, productivity, courtesy, integrity, initiative, responsiveness, punctuality, and other factors. Overall, her work performance received an average score, indicating satisfactory performance that could be improved with coaching. Her work attitude also received an average score. The report was completed by her supervisor Annie P. Santiago on October 17, 2023.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Appraisal Jem

    Uploaded by

    leviraplh14
    10 views6 pages
    This contractual appraisal report evaluates the work performance and attitude of Jemalyn B. Tarrobal from July 1 to December 31, 2023. The report rates her technical skills, efficiency, organization, productivity, courtesy, integrity, initiative, responsiveness, punctuality, and other factors. Overall, her work performance received an average score, indicating satisfactory performance that could be improved with coaching. Her work attitude also received an average score. The report was completed by her supervisor Annie P. Santiago on October 17, 2023.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This contractual appraisal report evaluates the work performance and attitude of Jemalyn B. Tarrobal from July 1 to December 31, 2023. The report rates her technical skills, efficiency, organization, productivity, courtesy, integrity, initiative, responsiveness, punctuality, and other factors. Overall, her work performance received an average score, indicating satisfactory performance that could be improved with coaching. Her work attitude also received an average score. The report was completed by her supervisor Annie P. Santiago on October 17, 2023.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    10 views6 pages

    Appraisal Jem

    Uploaded by

    leviraplh14
    This contractual appraisal report evaluates the work performance and attitude of Jemalyn B. Tarrobal from July 1 to December 31, 2023. The report rates her technical skills, efficiency, organization, productivity, courtesy, integrity, initiative, responsiveness, punctuality, and other factors. Overall, her work performance received an average score, indicating satisfactory performance that could be improved with coaching. Her work attitude also received an average score. The report was completed by her supervisor Annie P. Santiago on October 17, 2023.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 6

    CONTRACTUAL APPRAISAL REPORT

    Appraisal Period: JULY 1- DECEMBER 31, 2023

    Name: JEMALYN B. TARROBAL


    Educational Attainment: COLLEGE GRADUATE BS NURSING
    Position & Designation (if any): OFFICE AIDE
    Length of Service in QC Government: 2 YEARS
    Immediate Supervisor: ANNIE P. SANTIAGO
    Office: City Treasurer's Office-Real Estate Division-Assessment
    Remarks (please include violations of office rules and regulations / warnings
    or reprimands given, if any):

    Please check the appropriate box. Thank you.

    WORK PERFORMANCE INDICATORS:

    4=Very Satisfactory 3=Satisfactory 2=Below Satisfactory 1=Poor


    for achievements that for average output for those who need for those who do
    indicate work done being able to meet improvement in certain not meet work
    over and above office standards areas of work performance standards
    standard requirements

    WORK PERFORMANCE ( W.P. )


    4 3 2 1
    I. Technical / Working knowledge of the job

    II. Ability to comprehend and follow instructions

    III. Capacity to work with minimum supervision

    IV. Efficiency

    a. Speed: Fast release of requests

    b. Accuracy: Correctness of output

    V. Organization: systematic with files and


    other office documents

    VI. Productivity: optimizes working hours


    WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR W.P.: HIGH AVERAGE LOW (Please
    (Total Score ÷ 7) SCORE SCORE SCORE encircle)

    Comments (for Very Satisfactory & Poor ratings


    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    QCG-HRMD-QP Form No.7


    WORK ATTITUDE INDICATORS:

    4=Very Satisfactory 3=Satisfactory 2=Below Satisfactory 1=Poor


    for behavior and work for behavior and work for behavior and work considered
    attitude worthy of attitude expected of attitude not worth a liability to
    emulation a good public servant emulating the QC
    agency

    WORK ATTITUDE ( W.A. )

    I. Courtesy 4 3 2 1

    a. to superiors

    b. to co - workers

    c. to subordinates

    d. to the public / clientele

    II. Integrity / Honesty

    III. Initiative

    IV. Responsiveness

    a. to co - workers

    b. to clientele

    c. to pending communications

    d. to phone calls

    V. Promptness in obeying office orders

    VI. Attendance

    VII. Punctuality

    VIII. Discretion / Observance of Confidentiality

    IX. Respect for other people's work area


    & belongings

    X. Office Attire / Good Grooming

    WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR W.A.: HIGH AVERAGE LOW (Please


    (Total Score ÷ 16) SCORE SCORE SCORE encircle)

    Comments (for Very Satisfactory & Poor ratings):

    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
    OVER - ALL AVERAGE:
    ( W.P. + W.A. ) ÷ 2

    HIGH AVERAGE LOW (Please


    SCORE SCORE SCORE encircle)

    Significant Trainings Attended / Accomplishments not connected with work (if any):

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________

    WEIGHTED AVERAGE FOR WORK PERFORMANCE (W.P.) & WORK ATTITUDE (W.A. )

    High Score (H.S.)


    High Scorers are those who obtained a weighted average of 4.0 (Very Satisfactory).

    Average Score (A.S. )


    Average scorers are those who obtained a weighted average between 3.0 and 3.9
    (Satisfactory). They would need constant coaching / mentoring.

    Low Score (L.S. )


    Low Scorers are those who obtained a weighted average between 1.0 anad 2.9 (Below
    Satisfactory and Poor). They shall receive warnings / reprimands, which shall be
    the basis for their termination from the service if they continue to show no signs
    of improvement.

    Rated by: Date Accomplished:

    ANNIE P. SANTIAGO OCTOBER 17, 2023


    Division Chief – Real Estate Division

    Certified Correct:
    EDGAR T. VILLANUEVA
    City Treasurer

    You might also like