Bedes de Tabernaculo and de Templo
Bedes de Tabernaculo and de Templo
Bedes de Tabernaculo and de Templo
I
i
I
I
t
6ede's de cabenrnruIo arfr de cetnplo
l
Tessa Morrison
t
1 Abstract
The Temple of Solomon is the most frequently mentioned building in the Bible. The
i
dimensions, a description of the overall plan and the artefacts of the Temple, are
described in I Kings 6-8 and Ez*iel 40-42. However, the architectural plan and design
I of the features of the Temple are a forgotten memory that has been the subject of much
{ speculation. Not a single stone or any contemporary image that can be identified with
the Temple of Solomon has survived. However, this has not prevented the Temple from
being one of the most important and influential buildings, in both philosophical and
physical manifestations, throughout time. In I Corinttrians, Paul ofTarsus claimed that
he was like amaster-builder laying the foundations of the ternple of God; this ternple
was built of faithful souls. Paul tumed away from a physical temple to the congregation
and the spiritual temple. Solomon's Temple and Paul's master builder analogy become
a powerful and enduring temple metaphor in Christian writings. Bede's De Tabernaculo
nd De Templo reflect this tradition by claiming that the building of the Tabemacle and
{I Solomon's Temple signified one and the same Church of Christ. This paper explores
, Bede's vision of Solomon's Temple, the building and the metaphor.
J
i
nvz
,llJcJJnsur p:.rouci B JJtlu ':1.) Jo etup (pcttqlg) ut 't(tnlueo qulu eql ol se{s e$ pepp e^uq rozeH
eq1
pue ros?O 'opppe61 1e uotuolos qlp\ pePltossu ,fipuoppel ueaq e eII
BerB eql palqnop pBtl porall
lural s,uoruolos Jo aJnsolJue luql se1rs pclEoloeeqcru 1uucg1u31s Jo slolsnscxg 'eAl^ms aldua; eqt 3o
sEerur FJsJodrueluoJ fue seop rou'e1dure1 s.uotuolos se pegpuepl eq uec
rrcur lsrluslsqns ? su^\ t{Jrtl^l
1etp saltnms euols elEuts e 1ou 'tene,noH ,.1co1 eql Jo etuoq eql :JBruO
rel s.poJeH [q petdncco ueru
pFo r sq?uer s{ pIIe 'sen11g3o lmontr eW
go enbsoql eql qpeueq aq
tzy s,snqdesof u.I aJB aldurel ^\ou
gnq porsH Eupl ueq,tr g3g
eqsoddo s?^r '{!nq su \ ruel?sruef Jo,{llc aql qtlq \ uo sllg tulpmorms
ll
eql upt$ rer\ol el$l B pelecol ueeq o^Btl o11qtnoq1 sr e1duel aq1
Eq 3 ul sa,r 11 'pefo4sep Jo
s.uouolos se^\ sql leql I sell uoplp?4
lo4 l(q peEarseq ser* e1dua1 "'e1dua;
pu€ 'gCg 98S ol pel?p uaaci suq suaufssy eql [q uel?sme1;o elduel ureru
the Sepulchre, and the Martyrion of the Savior', 49; Barton, 'The Jerusalem of
David and Solomon', 16.
l9
Augustine, The City of God ed and trans H S Bettenson (Harmondsworth, 1972)
l7 .3, l7 .20, 18.45, 18.48, 21.26.
20
P Abelard, Theologia Christiano II.384 trans V Cousin (Paris, 1859).
gtz
scovery. In John Bunyan's 731.28 In a brief autobiographical note in Historia Ecclesiastico Gentis
tecture of the Temple was Anglorum, Bede claimed that
iopher Wren was interested in
irements of the construction of I have spent all my life in this monastery, applying myself
oor had made an intense study entirely to the study of the Scriptures; . . . it has always been
rs that he believed revealed its
my delight to learn or to teach or to write ... I have made it
The physical dimensions and my business, for my own benefit and that of my brothers, to
red to be where the Eryptian make brief extracts from the works of the venerable fathers
masons. This became part of on the holy Scriptures, or to add notes of my own to clarify
iint lodge being established in their sense and interpretation.2e
:hat Solomon's Temple was a It would follow that Bedeg purpose in writing scriptural exegesis
blueprint of the universe. He such as De Tabernaculo and De Templo was his own edification and that of
I mathematical calculations on his brothers. He carefully executed a verse-by-verse commentary on the
d the universe and the mind of Biblical texts of Exodus and Kings, which is largely composed of
mple.2s This continuous chain descriptions of
architectural detail of the Tabernacle of Moses and the
ifferent manifestations, stems Temple of Solomon. Every architectural feature, the measurements, the
.temple. Some of the links in objects and the building material were examined in a systematic manner.
hers. Bede's De Tabernaculo To Bede, the plan and features of the Tabernacle and the Temple created a
g and influential books in this harmonious and balanced whole, which were an allegory of the Christian
of Moses and the Temple of church.
ristian appropriation of Jewish Although both the sanctuaries were allegorical of the Christian
Temple as a metaphor for the church, Bede drew a notable distinction between them. He designated the
tradition where this metaphor Tabernacle the building of the present chwch, since it was built in the
:his metaphor in relation to the wilderness when the Israelites were on the road to the promised land, while
he designated the Temple the repose of the future church, because it was
built after the Israelites had taken possession of the promised land and the
ave been wriffen in the period
kingship of that land had been established. The Temple was to be
interpreted as a'vision ofpeace'.3o For Bede, the difference in the features
was written in the period 729-
ofthe sanctuaries could be generalised as follows.
The workmanship of the tabernacle is the time of the
of the ancient people of God), but the
synagogue (that is,
workmanship of the temple sigrrifies the church (that is that
i Midgley, The Miscellaneous multitude of elect which has come to faith after the Lord's
tthe ll/rens (London, 1750).
incarnation). For Moses completed the tabernacle with the
:ient lllonders (New Haven, 2002).
people of the Hebrews alone, but Solomon finished
ofthe Freemasons (London, 1984) [building] the temple with a multitude of proselytes gathered
'rtem secandam in quibw aginr De
lege Massachusetts MS 0434.
J O'Reilly, 'lntroduction' xviiJv in Bede: On the Temple trans S Connolly
, ofJerusalem" 143-157 in D Fraser
(Liverpool, 1995) at p xvii.
littkower (London and New York, 29
Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum trans translator The Ecclesiastical
History of the English People (Oxford, 1994) Chapter 24.
lder(ed), Bede: On the Tabernacle 30
Bede, De Tabernaculo Eans A G Holder, On the Tabernacle (Liverpool, 1994)
2.1.42.
I[o t{DlJ atl 'seqlru.rBJ regE 8€ 'g'g o1dwa1 ae'epn6.
LE
'
Z' U Geet toodra,rll) a1dua1 aqt uO : aPag',{11ouuo3 g w4 o1dwa1 aq'epeg 9€
srslrr pelBp 'ZI'Z olntoubqoJ ae 'eqeg
Berlpel{ BJelollqlg &ocuelo;g '?f,7'qBnoqlp {ot7 rUl 'srerpnreJ
9€
TE
BJ eqtJo uBld roold :y e.rnfig 'lll-AII solloJ I snupBlurv sn ewFuernB'I eeclPol I scolollqlg
'muero;g'snurtultuv xePoJ :tZ epld (OOOZ'etpuqur6) pP 7 1 -gg2'sa&ow1
'c,ropqy 'uolralpan :rytnoqlIo g:DlJ a{l
.$eqlursJ
fo 3ut3ou1 aW puD II €€
'
El' l' Z opcouraqol ag'epeg ZE
'
trel' f C dl ncDun qoJ aO' epeg IC
c
tr: iirlt rlrlu:rN 'uottntartlt,:rtttr Inlitll Jo Intl,irtnttt Inn|JBJ ,{ue uleluoo 1ou
s;r(rp uorlnl;udrltur lnrtroiilln nun tttst;oqttt(s Jaqttlnu s.apag ',tlunuuoc
fttz :rrlt trxu.l p,;rlolost pun.tfo In.l ur.;ttll sr^E:!l tl:lltl,tl 'sellBnlJues aqlJo Jeqlte JoJ
ft6 strun:rrd ro siurpunolns.;o uordtnsep ou st eJOtlI r€'uotsrn Jo ulgunotu
aqt 'qerroy! tunohl uo palEJol ,(;anEen sr aldural eql 'peuleluoc 1r spefqo
vE
&
eql qt!^\ raqFEot sernlseJ l€rnlca{qcrc s{ psqlrcsep fluo e11 'eltstuequl
er{l roJ uolllsod pcrqde.ltoeE l(uu eqpcsep rou ptp epag 1ce3 u1
tl 'e1dua1 eql Jo elc?rueqel oqr JoJ uuld roog
tr IleJo^o ou peqlrcsep epeg o1dwa1 ae Pw oltnDuraqDJ aO u selJen1cues
1.t&ufu'l tI qpqJo sernpeJ eqlJo Ile 8upgop oqdsep pA 'olf$ aru?s eglJo uuld roog
3 seAt l! ,(lquurnsord pq 'senyrms fdoc ou ,feptmgo3tu6 es'xePoc eruss
rl eql uo+ s1duel s(uouolos go eEeul us pouollueu osls ePeg 'lle/tt qJse
€
8.. Jo eprsno eql uo aerql Jo seq14 a^le rl eql Jo seru"u eql qI^\ II€l\
'1aurs1
pepetruoloc e s1 lcurcerd eql Eupunorms 'lruJehtr puu uosreg 'q1e3
s? "t1pu1g eql Jo septs eeJqr eql uo
:l^e'I Jo suos aql Jo seusu eql eJ? alteuJequJ
$ 'uor?v prn sesoIAIJo serueu eql eJ€ Jsl[? slql /r\oleg 'sSupago lumqJo Js{e
FE eql s! Ja^BI eql ol ueN 'se^lestuetp qss^\ ol s$atrd aql roJ Je^"1 azuoJq
&, eql sB/t\ elc?IueqeJ eql Jo ecu?4ue eql epls$O 'ilI?ua^oC eql Jo {JV eql
sd tI poop ereq :selloH go f1o11 eql se/n raqlmqc rew! aql uI 'peeJq \oqs eql
foZ roJ elqq eql pus puas durel peqcwrq ueles 3 'esuecut;o Jelp aW peulsluoc
tl Jequeqc Jemo eql ielceureqel aql ol sJeqlueqt o,tu eJe eJeql 1curcard
F rtr6l
E @
tr t! sl! pus elt€tueqel oql Jo ueld roog eql s^\ot{s (1 ernEg) elr"tueqel
eql go eEeun eq1 ,r'olnoau'DgDJ aO Jo {ooq puo3es eql rolpuuJg u
<)
@ tr xepoJ ruog elcelueqsl eql;o eteul stql peuopuetu epeg ,€'um!JB^lA le
5 @ D? fueF'suoru s.snJopotssuJ le ep?u ss/n qclq/h'.to1puelg xepoJ'ldpcsnueur
E E mg
uellsll lu?xe ra?uo1 ou e uodn pallepou ueeg el?q o1 ffinoql sl pue
fi\oJruf le /fte$?uoru s.epeg p pacnpord ser\ lI
t peleP 'snqlufruv
€€'SIL
xepoC eql ruo+ $
elcerueq?I eIR Jo aEerut ur'tou4-$oq eql
D, uourolosJo a1duetr puc elruuJequJ s6epeg
b; ,.'.eruoc ol eJtl oruJo ,fto1? eqt, palcldep osp ,(eq1
'plJol\ equo pue eql
o ot doqeercJo 8uruurSeq eql tuo{ lpq eq ol penupuoc qclryn 'qcmqc sloqm
eqlgo sstels luereslp sluaserdsr selJerucws o^q et11Jo Eqpllnq aq1
t!!L. N ,.'uolssagord
(q rou qu1q fq req{eu s^ref oJe \ ot{ r 'su?slue
,srrNvn
siq pue e.rf1;o turl aqlgo dleq eql qlpr osls prm'reqteEol
f,H;
ining all of the features of both {l
plo Bede described no overall {l
geographical position for the {
ilral features together with the z,
, Iocated on Mount Moriah. thc In
7q f
on ol sunoutrdings or Prccincts F
:m cut oll'antl isolatcd ltont thc
v i
I allcgoricul inlcrprclatiott dtrs r{l el
'
z' t' 8 sa ! tr4 rur'snqdesot ts 'tl'l'| opcoutaqoJ aQ 'ePeg
't'€ uoueuodlleBd II 'l'tl 9t
'02'9'tul)
ts pus Z'8lZ'9'.9'i oldual aO 'ePeg
st
I zt '81t'8'€ puE 1l l'8'g
'tt'9'stuu I i51'p'l 'eqeg
olncou"taqoJ aO
ts :lL'g'Z;Sg'g'Zt€g'g'Z:LV'Z'Z:EV'l'Z;82'L'l w
'9-S'9'stul) I "lz'9' I oF DuaqoJ ao'epea
'g'9'stuDl I
OE
tt
6n '
lZ' 9' I olnDu$qo1 ag'aPag zb
tq sB,l\ l! t?ql Petulelc snqdesot 'y'77o1dwa1 aO'ePeg
:aFual r/orlrolos loceppJ
s,
t'
'
lZ' g' I olttzou.oqDJ aQ'ePeg 2p'77 o1dwa1 a6r'aPag 0'
'Ieuet s! {qnc eqJ 'Z'9 seuu I 8t 'zr (rs6r) r/Ax
'll'v'I olnzDu$qoJ aQ 'waa Lb tslSopaot4cly 1Dcllqlg 24I '.e1dure1 s.uourolos Surpn4suocet, 'reqteD'I d 6€
tqEleq sll
isn tuoue ller\p Pue sn ol euoc o1 Eu1111,tt
)lqEleq eql pu? sroou oerr{l eqt q{^\ e^ol lstllJo apulldure aql s}sattns qlpr*r
se^\ eH qclq^\
nr 09 Jeqpu? sar\ JooJ eldurel sr1 lpqlueunq Euorue Pa^!l Jeuteepal pu? PJo'I mo qclq^\
pue fllstua$e rorols eppFu q1r,r ecueuud EuFegns-Euo1 aql s$eEflns {re eql So qfuel
ql tupreldxe fq {cualqsuocul
eql luql uuguot ot sltp {ool oPeg 'spueq
)JJoJ epog Es's{qnt 0Zl su/t\ oml Jo uuds aqt eq o1 pepuQsep eq qclq,tr '11qnc peJtes eql pus ltnue^oC
srud II 'qEteq ptuelu eql eq
eql Jo ryV aqt Jo slueruernseeru eql uo pe{nsuoc s1 snqdesol 'uotrp?4
tel erpJo {tJeq eql stupl 1 o1
qsr,lrel go uopeydordde uepspq3 srq ,$psnf ol sEuqum s.snqdasol
eql mq sEu!) Jo slueuams?eu
'a1durel eqlJo sluerueJnweu Sursn fqsraqt ',{Eopue u?FslrtlC sltl 01 ppe ol uollsrglrslt sFp Pesn
aq 'ra,raarro11 'sluoueJnsueu uuguoc o1 ro tunp Puu tuopnc qsp\af Jo
odllured Jo $[oog pqd,ftcods
qulod ,$rru1c o1 snqdesol ol peJreJeJ epeg er'.sul^lp pus JEInces empJe{l
ropnlcq oslB epeg 'relor,og
a^ e senr8 o1dwa1 aq
ul peureol lsoru puu &iltqe q lueiletxe $our 'luacsap {psapd Jo uetu
qspref, e snqdesol pelpc eH ,r'o1dwa1aq' rn seu4l moJprlr. rrolntDuaqDJ
g eql uo.g pqe^ala,{Fee1c su,n
aqr q soup oulu 'sul?u (q vfult1e 1ou 'snqdesof ol pguoJal epog
l slg 'eqnc ego edeqs eql q se/rr
yo [1o11 e{l rr'Iltle{ u stlqnc
eqlgo uorplerdrelul eW u! lslsse ol ers,n saJod eql pue .oledsot oqlJo qooq
,o'sernldtrcs
€$usrlc lsJu eql 'sreqluEr{c
JnoJ aql erem sEuu JnoJ erp'epeg rog 'se1od olg fq pepec eq uec { leql
u rulFurs s P?q rouelq eql os s8uy ueploE JnoJ sutl alqel eql'gel pmldpcs aql q
3^le^u
qnc ue^es s?/rr Joou uoBoq eql Lr'sal$odu
psoJq sllqnr e^g sul!\ Jequuqc aql ueserder elq4 eql uo se^sol e le^q er or'sJeIIpJ r
Aloq oql Jo speep
pls eql prmole sJeqrusqc eJe./rr prrs spro^\ eqlgo pesoduroc emldpcs peJc€s eql q elqel sql'epag ro3 lng
leep s11qnc uel pu? eppr s{qnr ..'seqFl luuotilpe4 e^lo^q eqlJo tlcue JoJ euo ',!mp selec Jo se^eol
^\eJqeH
anle,ru pa,(eldsrp slsepd eql elryl eql uo :uslloqtu(s puu pnrr qsl^\af
rq ur sllqnc 0g pus ePr^r silqnc [sa4
relul srll
'll?pp ur peqrlcsap u! IIJIJ s1 aldural eql pu? elcuuJeqel eqlJo Jequuqc Jelno eql uI pseJq^\eqs
ra1u1'slueuremsueur s (uoluolos Jo elqq eqt 'elduexe rog 'urqloqwb uBllslJIIJ Jo sulrel u1 paupldxa
u1 uorlducsep eql Eupegerd are sempeJ prnpe{qu" pue spafqo pnl1r qs!^\ef lls :seIJunpIIBs
,g 'eldtuel eqlJo ruserP eJo sr eqt u1 slceho eql Jo sasn ro spruu qs!^\ef ol rEeJ lou plp apeg
'ar$rg puu lueserd s,r(iluuusuq33o
r{toq u! peqrrcsep s eldtusl
'I I ,ftoEe11ueql peluert 1cqt sroqd4eru aruoceq peq feql ispefqo IBn11r qsl^\ef
Iqu s?r\ apeg 1eql eldurel aqt
Enorqt selr 1r 'rerre,roll Jo gql dlqsro,n Jo sosnoq qslaet reEuol ou ars,rr faql urlq
'a1dute1 oI
aql pue elcsuJeqsl eq1;o uo4uprdrelul eql pesIIIsIlslJqC pus uoplps.Il
polE aq lleqs e r 1eql ro
qsp\ef percpdorddu epeg 'qcrnqt wFsFqJ 1esre^lun sqt 3o sapoEalle
JIesurH eH l?ql reqlto su srsaEexe lemldpcs s.epeg ol ppu leql sroqdepru c11oqu,$ Jo sepes
rggo edoq eql s$attns
e ere ,(eql Jeqpr $q tupllnq ? pup luel u se s1 alduel aql Jou elc?tueqel
building but rather theY are a suggests the hope of future sublimity, in which He foresaw
Bede's scriptural exegesis as either that He Himself would be glorified after His passion
r. Bede approPriated Jewish or that we shall be glorified.aT
n of the Tabernacle and the
However, it was through the construction and the measurements of
ish houses of worshiP full of
the Temple that Bede was able to gloriS Christian ideals. Although the
phors that created the allegory
Temple is described in both I Kings and Ezekiel, in Ezekiel the description
is of a dream of the Temple. Bede does not refer to the passages of Ezekiel,
or uses of the objects in the
preferring the description in I Kings. In I Kings 5-7 the Temple of
:rd architectural features are
Solomon's measurements, internal fittings, decoration and ritual objects are
. For examPle, the table of described in detail. The intemal measurements were 60 cubits long, 20
nacle and the TemPle is rich in
cubits wide and 30 cubits in height.a8 The portico was 20 cubits long, 20
: priests displayed twelve fresh
cubits wide and ten cubits deep.ae The Temple had three floors and there
lve traditional Hebrew tribes.3e
were chambers around the sides and back of the Temple. The top floor
re composed of the words and chamber was five cubits broad, the middle floor was six cubits broad and
rves on the table rePresent the the bottom floor was seven cubits,so thus the exterior walls sloped inwards.
table has four golden rings so The interior had a similar floor plan to the Tabernacle. It had trvo
le, the four rings were the four chambers. The first chamber was 20 cubits wide, 40 cubits long and 30
ssist in the interPretation of the cubits in height.sr The Holy of Holies that housed the Ark of the Covenant
was in the shape of a cube, its height, width and length all 20 cubits52 and it
ys by name, nine times in De was clearly elevated from the frst chamber.
6 He called JosePhus a 'Jewish De Templo gives a verse-by-verse commentary on I Kings 5-6.
r ability and most learned in However, Bede also included the description of the Temple in the
ed to Josephus to clarifu Points apocryphal Books of Paralipomenon, relying on Josephus regarding the
r measurements. However, he measurements of the Temple. II Paralipomenon does parallel many of the
'istian analory, therebY using measurements of Kings but there is an occasional discrepancy. According
tian appropriation of Jewish to I Kings the height of the Temple is 30 cubits: this is generally taken to
easurements of the Ark of the II
be the internal height. Paralipomenon claimed that the external height
:signated to be the sPan of two
was 120 cubits.53 Bede corrected what would appear to be a massive
inconsistency by explaining that the 30 cubits of Kings only reaches the
-suffering patience with middle storey externally and that according to Josephus's account the
among humankind; its Temple roof was another 60 cubits.5a Thus, Bede claimed that the total of
love with which He was the three floors and the height of the roof clearly were as II Paralipomenon
among us; its height
'€l'9 seuJ)
'll's
I se 'y'go1dua1r('epeg l9
I B
s5u!)
's'E oldual aQ'ePe{J
'91'g uoueuodlan4 1
09
€e '9I-SI'S stury I
'LI'Z uoueuodlFr?d z ''t-€t'S
6S
zs stuD1 I 85
'6-8'SZ snpoxg
LS
'g'9'o1dua1 ae'eP€i$ eas alduexe nqloue,ro; 9S
'7'g oldual aqt 'ePeg s9
or inconsistencies between the And Solomon numbered (census) all the proselytes in the
tede adeptly converts them into
land of Israel, after the numbering which David his father
had made and they were found a hundred and fifty-three
cription of the building of the thousand and six hundred.u'
rtary is onExodus 24.12-30.31,
e plan, and of the vessels which According to Paralipomenon some of these proselytes were included
:de does not leave out a single amongst the workmen of the Temple. For Bede, the sons of Israel, the
However, n De Tabernaculo proselytes and the gentiles worked on the house of the Lord. Among the
hed Tabernacle. He never goes gentiles were King Hiram and his slaves who worked with Solomon's
x given by God. Consequently slaves together cutting timber.
the community that it was to Every kind of person by whom the Church was to be built
De Templo, where the TemPle had already gone before in the building of the Temple. For
,/o begins its commentary with I
the Jews and proselytes and gentiles converted to the truth of
1 from Hiram, King of Tyre. the Gospel build one and the same Church of Christ whether
lsmen and materials to build a
by upright living or by teaching as well.6t
m would supply both the skills
work together to conshuct the Bede built an image of accord and unity in a common purpose. In
who would work in Lebanon.58 using II Paralipomenon 2.17 the common purpose is extended beyond Jews
;onemasons and 3000 overseers, and gentiles. However, unlike De Tabernacalo,in De Templo the verse-by-
workers.5e Instead of the 3300 verse cornmentary is selective, and Bede omitted verses from the selected
)menon claimed that there were passage. Verses 5.7-12 werc omitted, and they state that Hiram would
)ourers represented the sabbath, deliver the skills, the cedars and the firs that Solomon desired in return for a
ope of the resurrection and the payment offood: 20 000 measures ofwheat and 20 measures ofpure oil
the faith in the holy Trinity. He every year.* Bede's commentary implies that Hiram was assisting in the
er and that building of the Temple for the common purpose, and not negotiating a
business contract. In addition, verses 6.ll-14 were omitted by Bede. In
are rightly wont to be these verses God commanded that Solomon execute God's judgement and
I because holy Scripture
keep his commandments, for then God 'will dwell among the children of
s of piety as well as true Israel, and will not forsake my people Israel'.65 Notably the gentiles and the
,vorks are rightly said to proselytes were not included.
The remainder of De Templo is a description of the Temple that was
ed to render another apparent built and completed. Like De Tabernocalo, it is a Christian appropriation
tent with I Kings. of Jewish tradition using number symbolism and Christian allegory. Bede
brmation on the workmen, presented the Tabernacle as a divine plan, not as a sanctuary of worship.
However, the image of the Temple that he represented was very different.
For Bede, Solomon's Temple was a holy sanctuary, but of prophetic
meaning heralding the universal church built for a united destiny.
2.
62 2 Paralioomenon 2.17.
(r3 Bede, De Templo 3.5.
64 t Kines 5.1l.
65 I Kinis 6.13.
tsz
ctH lDtusDrsapaa a{l .snlqasng
'Lr'suouos sDoT aO .uquniopy
g8
'gyg a1doa4 qnpug aryp tuotslH lDclsDlsaptg aql'epa,A
LL
t8 '97'g a1doa4 qqQug aqt to rQuslg 1ocltsolsapc7 aUl 'eqag,
I pe s,rrrurs srroT aQ.WuttoPY €8 '97'g a1doa4 qsntug aqtto ttotslg lDcusD,sapcfl aq1'epag
9L
rlH locnsarsaPtg ardl 'snlqesng 9L
z8 'gy7 a1doa4 qslpug aqt lo tuots111 locusDtsapcg aql 'epeg
2a8ngfo qtoaq
^el}tSI I-Sl,
VL
IL
itot s!H I oc! t so! s a I ccg aql . epe'd
6L '(osor)
8L
ZL wnroulto7 salras'wuouD!ts!a13 ndn3.slclerqeH snqluluroN eO,'etuo're1 OL
'(066I 'BIruoJIlBXeqg) Taqng laqdol4 aqtlo tloog aW uo parg aril
tfuoBalgto santuog aql 'f,srC I $NnZlalryzg uo saltuoH ?erg eW,fioEerg 69
9Z' lZ'81'81' 9t' 8l'02' Ll'Pog lo,(t!J a4;'eqlsnSnv
'
89
ffipr aql uo
,r.e3pe '88t-€8€'69€-55€'(t66I loqstspty) Z66I nqwadag 6-9 u11qnq a&a11o3
{{/h rnoJ !qt1u pue ,(ep &1u1l1 w aaua.ta{uo7 n p s8qpaacot4 : spay to Toog aql '(Pe),{auoqe;41.9
s eql uo $ ecrr?Jue eql t ul L6t-VtE .ftopeuaE uecn'I er.n :slle)l Jo loog eql pue stsetaxg, ',(lllad.O f L9
'41-01 :€ sueqluuoc I
99
:epeg Joc
rs puuq-1qEu oql sprs^rol eql s?eJeqrt\ 8/'rusqxeH pu? lruepsnJef Jo seqJJnIIc aql ,r'stuugsrputl
ue ffip reqp eql :peq srllmqtulF?'I o.5FoA ,r'[mq.nlue3 ,.'sueqly lS m seqcmqo Jo uollecryep
)p psceld eJp ureql pue uopcero eql PeqlrcseP e*g 'ocltsolsapcg
^rol tulumq a
sduel
"t*t%;$r,I[ u"*u"
1s la^rl
tu eql ol Eurprocce "' uel6gqC (uu epnlcul o1 roqduleu sql puexe lou p1p epag 'renernoll
'q3mqc psra^lrm eql Jo uolluFrlue lceJ|Jed aql se roqdepur pmlce{r{us
q$os eql uo e3u?.que eql q l"ql
eql pesn aH 'etuoJef pue froEerg Jo leqt repcped u1 'sreqlo 3o
\sel epeg ,seJ$ode zl aql qlllr
p pareduroc uguuropv suerer{ \ {Jo^\ eql pue roqdepur s.lned uo {Fq epeg 'o1dwal aCI pw opzou,pqDJ
aCI ul ,,'peculd pu" peJeplsuoc {lqeruc esJnoc qcee 'arror ,(q r*or
nserqdured {1aso1c aq
z'sltcuos slle^A eql dn tgnq qEng suoltupunoJ eql ppt psq suosutu eql acuo :Eqpllnq
o uorlclucsep s.epeg ul
s e{r[ s?an ernldpcs perc"s eql leql peultulc roltl1 lul?SJo q6nH uepoloaql
r8',sleEu? Jo Eurl;arnp f.rryuec-qgleru eqJ '(lengsuerye roqdepu slql pasn srerpo [ueur
,eq u:e6am aql go lsduqc reddn
prrc
ozeruoJef un'leelg
aqt,ftoterg ,n'au$nEny ,n'esorquy s? qcns sJulotlcs
qtec eql pepsuued poDJo 1q3ll
r'{mlusc qgle,rq eql uI :^Aoloaql u?nsrJr{J pepauued roqduptu Jepllnq-Je$etu er.{J
'ulqlr eldruol lenll{ds eqt ol prre uolptortuoc
os.JerruoJ aql eql ol e1due1 pcrsKqd ? uo{ ,(e,lu roqdepur eql srry Irud 'pog
Jo suope$eJrueu ,(1quue eren (eq1 'semldpcg rr?llslnlS eql ul slueuele
19 go e;dueg aq1 uodn
a lo 'urc1esnla1 rerlpoo8 pegodrul peuleruer uouolosJo s1duel eqlJo uolpeJe eql pue eltstueq?I
g ro'e1cuu;eqq au!^lp eqg 'sarnldurs eql uo splpq roqdupru slql qtnoqltV
)t{l IIsr plnoqs euo "' ^€rqeH
qer slq JoJ uotrlolos puoces eql ,r'ere ef, aldurel qcrryr'[1oq sl pog
go eldue1 eql roJ !,(o4sep poC qq ?oCJo aldutel aqr elgep
ac qtmoJ eql ul 'pogJo eEeur ueru ,(ueg1 1,no,( ur qplle/rp poDJo IFIdS eql leql pw 'poD
FlUe pu? srallur ,(uu;41 go eldruel eql eJ" e,( pqt lou e,{ ,t\ou; "' uoeJeql qppllnq
rlun arpJo ro poCJo eEerul eql Jaqpus pw 'uollupunoJ eql ppl eneq 1 'repltnq-Jelseru eslit\
rq ,(q peuueld pup peparrp pue
s su 'aur olun uenrE q qclq \ poDJo eteJg eql o1 Euproccy
lslJrlJJo sasnoq eJetr seqrJnqt
'EqrytW F^epeur pepaurad qc1ryn 'roqde1eru replFq
ecus serJenlcues {q1me raqlo
rr eldurel eql pu? epetueqBl -relsuru tuunpua uu peull$o '1xal uepslrlC {a1 e u1 ]rud rulss
.roqdupru sr elduel eq;
Tabernacle and the Temple were earthly sanctuarieso they differed from
outlined an enduring master- other earthy sanctuaries since their plans were God-given. These other
thinking. churches were houses of Christian worship built for the glorification of God
r is given unto me, as a and directed and planned by humans. For Bede, they were not symbols of
bundation, and another the image of God or of the universal church.
at ye are the temPle of Many writers and artists have perceived the Christian church as an
eth in you? If anY man image of God. In the fourth century, Eusebius hailed the Bishop of Tyre as
stroy; for the temPle of the second Solomon for his rebuilding ofthe cathedral of Tyre:7e
... one should call thee a new Bezalel the architect of a
L the Hebrew ScriPtures, the divine tabernacle, or Solomon the king of a new and far
rf Solomon remained imPortant goodlier Jerusalem, or even a new Zerubbabel who bestowed
were earthlY manifestations of upon the Temple of God that glory which greatly exceeded
rm a physical temPle to the the former.so
in. In the twelfth century, Abbot Suger of Saint Denis claimed that the
;rmeated Christian theolory; light of God permeated the cathedral that he built at Saint Denis and that the
'egory the Great,6e JeromeTo and upper chapel of the western bays was 'most beautiful and worthy to be the
sively. The twelfth-century dwelling of angels'.8r
rt the sacred scriPture was like a In Bede's descripion of the churches of Jerusalem in his De Locis
rdations Hugh built uP the walls Sanctiss2 he closely paraphrased Adomn6n's De Locis Sanctis.s3 However,
iidered and placed." ln De whereas Adomn6n compared the 12 hanging lamps in the holy sepulchre
r Paul's metaPhor and the work with the 12 apostles, Bede leaves out this description. Adomndn claimed
' and Jerome. He used the that in the entance on the southern side:
rlation of the universal church. ... according to the number of the twelve holy apostles,
rphor to include anY Christian twelve burning lamps shine always day and night. Four of
them are placed low down at the bottom of the sepulchral
de described the erection and bed: the other eight are placed higher up above the margin
terbury,t3 York,Ta Lastingham,Ts
-Hexham.ts towards the right-hand side.8a
' and Whereas the
For Bede:
The entrance is on the south side, where twelve lamps burn
the Lucan genealory' 344-397 inF
dings of a Conference at TrinitY
day and night, four within the sepulchre and eight above it
rot, 1994), 355'369, 383'388. on the right edge.85
,48,21.26.
ns T Gray, The Homilies of Gregory
(Etna Califomia 1990).
)hristianorum, Series Latinorum 72 ?8
Bede, The Ecclesiastical History of the English People 5.20.
79
Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History X.iv hans. J. E. L. Oulton (London, 1949).
xk, l99l) vi,4. 80
Eusebius, The Eccles iastical History X.iv, 3.
ish People 1.7. 8l
S McKnight Crosby, The Royal Abbey of Saint-Denis: From lts Beginnings to the
ish People 1.33. Death of Suger, 475-l ISl(New Haven and London, 1987)222.
ish People 2.14. E2
Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History 5.16.
ish People 3.23. E3
Adomndn, De Locis Sanctis ed D Meehan (Dublin, 1958).
84
ish People 3.25. Adomn6n, De Locis Sanctis,47.
'ish People 5.16. 85
Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History, 5.16.
255
997,
'zl-l'4 stuDl I 8s
'tt-tl'9stuD I /8
'zt-L's saul) I en
De Locis Sanctis, Bede's De representations of the Temple of Solomon. As a house of worship, and later
rhoric description in Bede's De as a metaphor, the Temple of Solomon, it has been one of the most
important and influential buildings in the western historical nadition.