come together to achieve particular objectives. formal group informal group People often feel strongly about their groups partly because, shared experiences amplify our perception of events Social identity theory proposes that people have emotional reactions to the failure or success of their group because their self-esteem gets tied to whatever happens to the group. When your group does well, you bask in reflected glory, and your own self-esteem rises. When your group does poorly, you might feel bad about yourself, or you might reject that part of your identity if your group is devalued and disrespected, your social identity might feel threatened, and you might endorse deviant behaviors to “get even” and restore your group’s standing. Social identities can even lead people to experience pleasure as a result of seeing another group suffer. Ingroup favoritism occurs when we see members of our group as better than other people, and people not in our group as all the same. Ingroups and outgroups pave the way for social identity threat, which is akin to stereotype threat. With social identity threat, individuals believe they will be personally negatively evaluated due to their association with a devalued group, and they may lose confidence and performance effectiveness. Temporary groups with finite deadlines pass through a unique sequencing of actions (1) Their first meeting sets the group’s direction, (2) the first phase of group activity is one of inertia and thus slower progress, (3) a transition takes place exactly when the group has used up half its allotted time, (4) this transition initiates major changes, (5) a second phase of inertia follows the transition, and (6) the group’s last meeting is characterized by markedlyaccelerated activity Workgroups shape members’ behavior, and they also help explain individual behavior as well as the performance of the group itself. Roles norms, status, size, cohesiveness, diversity all group members are actors, each playing a role, a set of expected behavior patterns attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit. We are required to play a number of diverse roles, both on and off our jobs. Different groups impose different role requirements on individuals role Perception-how we’re supposed to act in a given situation is a role perception Role expectations are the way others believe you should act in a given context When compliance with one role requirement may make it difficult to comply with another, the result is role conflict- when the expectations of our different, separate groups are in opposition role Play and Assimilation All groups have established norms—acceptable standards of behavior shared by members that express what they ought and ought not to do under certain circumstances. When agreed to by the group, norms influence behavior with a minimum of external controls. Norms and emotions frequent communication can increase the power of norms. the normative effect of groups can powerfully influence group attitudes and outcomes. Norms and Conformity As a member of a group, you desire acceptance by the group. Thus, you are susceptible to conforming to group norms. Norms and behavior norms in the workplace significantly influence employee behavior. Positive Norms and Group Outcomes if employees aligned their thinking with positive norms, these norms would become stronger and the probability of positive impact would grow exponentially. Negative Norms and Group Outcomes Status—a socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by others—permeates every society What determines status? According to status characteristics theory, status tends to derive from one of three sources: 1. The power a person wields over others. Because they likely control the group’s resources, people who control group outcomes tend to be perceived as high status. 2. A person’s ability to contribute to a group’s goals. People whose contributions are critical to the group’s success tend to have high status. 3. An individual’s personal characteristics. Someone whose personal characteristics are positively valued by the group (good looks, intelligence, money, or a friendly personality) typically has higher status than someone with fewer valued attributes status and Norms Status has some interesting effects on the power of norms and pressures to conform. High-status individuals may be more likely to deviate from norms when they have low identification (social identity) with the group. status and Group Interaction People tend to become more assertive when they seek to attain higher status in a group. They speak out more often, criticize more, state more commands, and interrupt others more often. Lowerstatus members tend to participate less actively in group discussions; when they possess expertise and insights that could aid the group, failure to fully utilize these members reduces the group’s overall performance. status Inequity It is important for group members to believe the status hierarchy is equitable. Perceived inequity creates disequilibrium, which inspires various types of corrective behaviors. Hierarchical groups can lead to resentment among those at the lower end of the status continuum. status and stigmatization Although it’s clear that your own status affects them way people perceive you, the status of people with whom you are affiliated can also affect others’ views of you. Group status Social loafing, the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when alone When managers use collective work situations, they must also be able to identify individual efforts. greater performance diversity creates greater social loafing the longer a group is together, which decreases satisfaction and performance. Research indicates that the stronger an individual’s work ethic is, the less likely that person is to engage in social loafing (1) set group goals, so the group has a common purpose to strive toward; (2) increase intergroup competition, which focuses on the shared group outcome; (3) engage in peer evaluations; (4) select members who have high motivation and prefer to work in groups; (5) base group rewards in part on each member’s unique contributions. Groups differ in their cohesiveness—the degree to which members are attracted to each other and motivated to stay in the group. the members have spent a great deal of time together, the group’s small size or purpose facilitates high interaction, or external threats have brought members close together. Cohesiveness affects group productivity cohesiveness and productivity depends on the group’s performance- related norms. 1) Make the group smaller, (2) encourage agreement with group goals, (3) increase the time members spend together, (4) increase the group’s status and the perceived difficulty of attaining membership, (5) stimulate competition with other groups, (6) give rewards to the group rather than to individual members, (7) physically isolate the group The final property of groups we consider is diversity in the group’s membership, or the degree to which members of the group are similar to, or different from, one another. Diversity appears to increase group conflict, especially in the early stages of a group’s tenure; this often lowers group morale and raises dropout rates. groups in which members’ values or opinions differ tend to experience more conflict, but leaders who can get the group to focus on the task at hand and encourage group learning are able to reduce these conflicts and enhance discussion of group issues Surface-level diversity—in observable characteristics such as national origin, race, and gender—alerts people to possible deep-level diversity—in underlying attitudes, values, and opinions. Groups versus the Individual Groups generate more complete information and knowledge. By aggregating the resources of several individuals, groups bring more input as well as heterogeneity into the decision process. They offer increased diversity of views. groups lead to increased acceptance of a solution. Group members who participate in making a decision are more likely to enthusiastically support and encourage others to accept it later. time-consuming Conformity pressures. dominated by one or a few members ambiguous responsibility Group decisions are generally more accurate than the decisions of the average individual in a group, but less accurate than the judgments of the most accurate person. In terms of speed, individuals are superior. If creativity is important, groups tend to be more effective. And if effectiveness means the degree of acceptance of achievable solutions,the nod again goes to the group. With few exceptions, group decision making consumes more work hours than having an individual tackle the same problem. The exceptions tend to be instances in which, to achieve comparable quantities of diverse input, the single decision maker must spend a great deal of time reviewing files and talking to other people