ES04
ES04
Abstract
The used cooking oil has high potential to produce renewable, cheap and clean-burning
diesel substitute. The oil sample was introduced to two separate processes for the
production of biodiesel. With a fresh volume of used oil for each, the first process was
standard transesterification, and the second process was ozonolysis-coupled
transesterification. The second reaction was done to verify any comparable difference
between biodiesel achieved without ozone and biodiesel synthesized through ozonolysis.
In the first set-up, the reaction was carried out using a simple batch reactor that
contained a mixture of used cooking oil, ethanol, and dissolved sodium hydroxide. In the
second set-up, the batch reactor was modified with an inlet for the ozone coming from the
ozone generator, and an outlet for the excess ozone leading to a potassium iodide trap.
Here the independent variables were temperature, molar ratio of ethanol to oil, and length
of time of ozone exposure. The operating conditions for the reaction with and without
ozone were determined through Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Samples from
each set up were obtained and then analyzed through gas chromatography.
Results showed that sole transesterification produced long-chain ethyl esters such as ethyl
caproate, ethyl laurate, ethyl palmitate, and ethyl octadecanoate. The transesterification
with ozonolysis produced short-chain ethyl ester products which were ethyl laurate, ethyl
isomyristate, and ethyl palmitolate. The former reaction had its best yield at 60°C and 1:4
molar ratio of ethanol to oil, while the latter had best yield at 40°C, 1:6 molar ratio of
ethanol to oil, and 80 minutes of exposure to ozone. All products of the reaction with
ozone comparably had higher biodiesel yield with an added advantage of shorter-chain
esters which allow more control over the flow properties of the biodiesel. The ozonolysis
reaction succeeded in attempting to produce a satisfactory diesel substitute.
Methods
In transesterification, oil feedstock was charged into the reactor equipped with magnetic
stirrer and hotplate and was heated to a specified temperature with constant stirring at 750
rpm. The alkali catalyst was prepared by dissolving the sodium hydroxide pellet (1 g
NaOH) to 50 mL ethanol then the solution was added to the oil feedstock. The temperature
and molar ratio of ethanol to the used cooking oil was varied according to the experimental
design. After the reaction, the solution was allowed to cool and settle overnight in a
separatory funnel where ethyl ester (biodiesel) and glycerine separated.
The glycerine layer was decanted and the ethyl ester layer was washed with tap
water about three times to dissolve and remove excess alcohol compounds until the water
was clear and neutral. Finally, the ethyl ester content in the biodiesel product was
determined through Gas Chromatography. A schematic diagram for the transesterification
process is described in Figure 1. In Ozonolysis, the experimental setup used was the same
as that in the transesterification reaction, except that ozone was injected continuously as the
reaction proceeded with a defined reaction time. The gas was generated through an
Ozonizer that produced ozone from oxygen gas at 200 mg per hour. Tubes were used to
deliver ozone gas to the reactor containing the mixture of used cooking oil, ethanol and
catalyst. The exit port of the reactor was connected into a potassium iodide solution trap in
order to trap unreacted ozone. The reaction was run at varying temperatures, molar ratio,
and time of exposure to ozone which were varied according to the experimental design
Figure 2 shows the schematic diagram of the simultaneous transesterification and
ozonolysis process.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of transesterification set-up
Experimental Design
The design used to optimize the operating conditions was by Second-Order Response
Surface or Central Composite Design (CCD). CCD works efficiently for quadratic models
but cannot support full cubic graphs. [4]
This research focuses on the effect of three independent variables: reaction
temperature, molar ratio of ethanol to oil and ozone exposure of the sample. These design
variables were evaluated at two responses: percent yield without ozone (response 1) and
percent yield with ozone (response 2). The three independent variables were studied and
optimized.
Response Optimization
The response surface analyses focused on modeling process. The optimization of the
measured responses indicates areas in the design region where the process is likely to give
desirable results. The selection of appropriate model for each response was followed by
finding a set of operating conditions that optimize all responses or keep them at desired
ranges. In this study, the variables were criticized based on how they affect the percent
yield of the biodiesel product. A useful approach to multiple responses is to use the
simultaneous optimization technique by Derringer and Suich (1980) called as desirability
functions.[5]
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response data was evaluated. In the
transesterification process, the result showed that the quadratic model was significant. It
also showed that the model terms, temperature and molar ratio were both significant model
terms that have notable effect to the responses.
For ozonolysis, the result showed that the model was also significant. The analysis
of variance result showed that temperature and molar ratio were significant linear terms;
temperature-molar ratio and temperature-ozone exposure relationships were significant
interaction terms, and molar ratio is a significant quadratic term.
Model Graph and Effect of Independent Variables of Response 1
The results show that the percent yield of transesterification increased significantly
with increasing reaction temperature and molar ratio hence higher long chain fatty acid
ethyl ester produced. There is also a dramatic decrease of percent yield observed with
decreasing temperature and molar ratio. This condition is expected because the rate of
transesterification reaction will increase with increasing reaction time that can be deduced
from its reaction kinetics. If the reaction temperature rises, the rate constant increases as is
based on Arrhenius Law.[10] Figure 4 shows the quadratic model graph of molar ratio and
temperature with constant ozone exposure at 95 minutes.
Model Graph and Effect of Independent Variables of Response 2
The experimental set-up that is introduced with ozone converts the unsaturated fatty
acid content of the oil to short chain fatty acid ethyl ester. This conversion increases with
high molar ratio and decreased reaction temperature. The percent yield decreases at low
molar ratio and higher reaction temperature. The ozonolysis reaction requires high ozone
solubility in the oil; hence higher temperature will reduce the amount of ozone and impair
the ability to crack double bonds in unsaturated fatty acids. Figure 5 shows the quadratic
model graph of reaction temperature and molar ratio versus percent yield of ozonolysis
product.
Figure 6. % Yield with ozone versus ozone exposure and temperature
Figure 6 shows that the ozonolysis product increased significantly at lower reaction
temperature and low exposure to ozone. This is evident in the experimental data gathered
at 40°C and 80 minutes ozone exposure at run number 1. There is also considerable
increase in yield with increased ozone exposure but not as high as the percent yield
obtained at lower ozone exposure. However, the percent yield decreases significantly at
higher temperature and low ozone exposure. The model graph below shows the percent
yield with ozone versus ozone exposure and temperature at constant molar ratio of ethanol
to oil at 1:5.
Figure 7. % Yield with ozone versus ozone exposure and molar ratio
The results show that there is an increased ozonolysis product with increased molar
ratio of ethanol to oil. On the other hand, the yield decreased significantly at higher ozone
exposure and lower molar ratio. The experimental data of highest yield at 90.33% is
obtained at 80 minutes ozone exposure and 1:6 molar ratio of oil to ethanol. The yield
slightly increased with lower molar ratio and lower exposure to ozone. Figure 7 shows the
quadratic graph of percent yield with ozone exposure and molar ratio at constant
temperature at 50°C.
Gas Chromatogram Results
(a) Capric acid, ethyl ester, (b) Lauric acid, methyl ester, (c) Lauric acid, ethyl ester, (d)
Methyl isomyristate, (e) Myristic acid, ethyl ester, (f) Palmitic acid, methyl ester, (g)
Palmitic acid, ethyl ester, (h) trans-Vaccenic acid, methyl ester, (i) 9-Octadecenoic acid,
ethyl ester, (j) Octadecanoic acid, 17-methyl-, methyl ester
(a) Methyl laurate, (b) Methyl isomyristate, (c) Methyl palmitolate, (d) Methyl palmitate,
(e) Methyl octadeca-9,12-dienoate, (f) Methyl trans-9-octadecenoate, (g) Methyl eicosa-
5,8,11,14,17-pentaenoate, (h) Methyl 9-eicosenoate, (i) Methyl 4,7,10,13,16,19-
docosahexaenoate, (j) Dodecanoic acid, 1-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2-ethanediyl ester
The transesterification product of highest yield was analyzed through Gas
Chromatography. Results showed that the saturated fatty acids in the used cooking oil were
effectively converted to long chain fatty acid ethyl esters (ethyl laurate, ethyl myristate,
ethyl palmitate, and ethyl stearate) as shown in the major peaks of chromatogram.
The results obtained by this study showed that there were peaks detected that were
the same with the gas chromatogram results of transesterification product by Farooq et al.
(2009) and Nakpong et al. (2013). The results of the previous literature were compared to
the study of the researchers and there had been compounds that were common to both
biodiesel produced.
The chromatogram of ozonolysis product revealed that the unsaturated fatty acid
content of the used cooking oil was converted to short chain fatty acid ethyl ester. This is
evident on Figure 8b where there are small peaks detected in the chromatogram. The
sample used in the analysis was run under 40°C, 1:6 molar ratio of ethanol to oil and 80
minutes exposure to ozone. It was chosen to be the sample analyzed because it obtained the
highest from its specified parameter.
The biodiesel produced from ozonolysis was also compared with the gas
chromatogram results of other studies. The peaks detected for the result of gas
chromatogram by Purwanto et al. (2013) shows compounds that were common to the both
produced biodiesel.[11]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The fulfillment of this thesis paper required the invaluable help of many different people,
in their different ways. The researchers would like to extend profound gratitude to the
following people who gave us the determination to pursue this study and to make it
possible. First and foremost to our considerate thesis adviser, ASEAN Engr. Eulalio C.
Creencia, to whom we are exceedingly thankful for his great efforts of supervising and
leading us to accomplish this fine work. To our mentors, Dr. Maria Sheila K. Ramos and
Engr. Ralf Ruffel Abarca, to whom we are thankful for their exemplary guidance and
support for helping us in choosing a research topic and for assisting us in our statistical
method used. And lastly to the MSU-IIT Chemistry Department, to which we are deeply
touched and grateful for their sincerity and kindness for giving us the opportunity of using
their newfangled Gas Chromatography equipment and generously providing us the free
expense of analyzing our samples.
CONCLUSION
This study had been successful in producing biodiesel from waste cooking oil by
transesterification and ozonolysis reactions. The use of RSM in determining the optimum
conditions was an effective method in studying the influence of the input variables on the
response variables. The use of RSM had also been both resourceful and time-saving since
the number of experimental runs was reduced. The chromatogram of ozonolysis product
revealed that the unsaturated fatty acid content of the used cooking oil was converted to
short chain fatty acid ethyl ester. The highest yield obtained for the transesterification
reaction (Response 1) was 88.5% at 60°C operating temperature and 1:4 molar ratio of
ethanol to oil. On the other hand, the highest yield for the ozonolysis reaction (Response 2)
was 90.33% at 40°C, 1:6 molar ratio of ethanol to oil and 80 minutes of exposure to ozone.
REFERENCES
[1] N. Elsolh, The Manufacture of Biodiesel from the Used Vegetable Oil. Thesis (MS),
Kassel and Cairo Universities, 2011.
[2][8][11] E. Purwanto and L. Riadi, “The optimization of biodiesel synthesis from used
cooking oil using ozone technology”, 20th Regional Symposium on Chemical
Engineering (RSCE 2013) Technical Papers, Module A (A1), pp. 5-12, 2013.
[3] A. Derimbas, “Progress and recent trends in biodiesel fuels”, Energy Conversion and
Management, Vol. 50, pp. 14-34, 2009.
[4][9] R. Myers, D. Montgomery, and C. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology:
Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 3rd Edition, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2009.
[5] G. Derringer and R. Suich, “Simultaneous optimization of several response variables,”
Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, pp. 214–219, 1980.
[6] L. Riadi, E. Purwanto, Melisa, and Y. Chandra, ”Ash based-catalysed in promoting
ozonolysis of used cooking oil”, International Journal of Engineering & Technology,
Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 87-90, 2012.
[7] D. Moigradean, M. Poiana, L. Alda, and I. Gogoasa, “Quantitative identification of
fatty acids from walnut and coconut oils using GC-MS method”, Journal of
Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, Vol. 19(4), pp. 459-463, 2013.
[8] M.P. Dorado, E. Ballesteros, F.J. López, and M. Mittelbach, “Optimization of alkali-
catalyzed transesterification of Brassica Carinata oil for biodiesel production”, Energy
and Fuels, Vol. 18, pp. 77–83, 2004.
[10] O. Levenspeil, Chemical Reaction Engineering 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc,
Toronto,1999.