tp385 1

Department of the Army *TRADOC Pamphlet 385-1
Headquarters, United States Army

Training and Doctrine Command
Fort Eustis, Virginia 23604-5700
6 January 2012
Safety
THE TRADOC MODEL SAFETY PROGRAM AND SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE
FOR THE COMMANDER:
OFFICIAL: JOHN E. STERLING, JR.

Lieutenant General, U.S. Army
Deputy Commanding General/
Chief of Staff
CHARLES E. HARRIS III

Colonel, GS
Deputy Chief of Staff, G-6
History. This publication is a rapid action revision. The portions affected by this administrative
revision are listed in the summary of change.
Summary. This pamphlet serves as the basis for doctrine development and organizing,
implementing, resourcing, and assessing safety and occupational programs within the U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC).
Applicability. This pamphlet applies to all TRADOC organizations, activities, centers and
schools.
Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this pamphlet is the TRADOC Deputy
Commanding General/Chief of Staff. The proponent has the authority to approve exceptions or
waivers to this pamphlet that are consistent with controlling law and regulations. The proponent
may delegate this authority in writing, to a division chief with the proponent agency or its direct
reporting unit or field-operating agency, in the grade of colonel or the civilian equivalent.
To request an exception or waiver to this pamphlet, send a written request to
usarmy.jble.tradoc.mbx.tradoc-g1-4-safety-office@mail.mil prior to initiating deviation.
*This pamphlet supersedes TRADOC Pamphlet 385-1, 17 March 2009.
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Identify specific conflict(s) with pamphlet and provide justification for the request and alternate
measures. Include an assessment of the associated risk with the request.
Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on
DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publication and Blank Forms) directly to
Commander, TRADOC (ATCS-S), 950 Jefferson Ave, Fort Eustis, VA 23604-5754 or
usarmy.jble.tradoc.mbx.tradoc-g1-4-safety-office@mail.mil. Suggested improvements may also
be submitted using DA Form 1045 (Army Ideas for Excellence Program (AIEP) Proposal).
Distribution. This pamphlet is available only on the TRADOC Homepage at

http://www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/.
_____________________________________________________________________________
Summary of Change
TRADOC Pamphlet 385-1

The TRADOC Model Safety Program and Self-assessment Guide
This revision, dated – 6 January 2012
o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with Army Regulation 385-10.
o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with 29 Code of Federal Regulation

1910.
o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with 29 Code of Federal Regulation

1926.
2
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Contents
Page
Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 6
1-1. Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 6
1-2. References .......................................................................................................................... 6
1-3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms ............................................................................. 7
Chapter 2. Safety Program Overview ............................................................................................ 7
2-1. Standard .............................................................................................................................. 7
2-2. Safety program success ...................................................................................................... 7
Chapter 3. Safety Program Elements ............................................................................................. 8
3-1. Composite risk management (CRM) .................................................................................. 8
3-2. Inspections, assessments, and evaluations .......................................................................... 9
3-3. Hazard abatement ............................................................................................................... 9
3-4. Accident reporting, investigation, and analysis .................................................................. 9
3-5. Education, training, and safety awareness ........................................................................ 10
3-6. Branch safety/Risk Management integration ................................................................... 10
3-7. Additional/Collateral duty safety program ....................................................................... 10
3-8. Safety and Occupational Health Advisory Council (SOHAC) ........................................ 11
3-9. Emergency action plans .................................................................................................... 11
3-10. Initial military training (IMT)......................................................................................... 11
3-11. Motor vehicle accident prevention ................................................................................. 11
Chapter 4. Self-Assessment Guide .............................................................................................. 11
4-1. Implementation and use .................................................................................................... 11
4-2. Standards/documentation.................................................................................................. 12
4-3. Application ....................................................................................................................... 12
Appendixes
A. References ........................................................................................................................... 12
B. Self-Assessment Guide ....................................................................................................... 20
C. Conditioning/Obstacle Course Criteria ............................................................................... 90
D. Rappel Tower Site Inspection Criteria .............................................................................. 134
Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………..136
Table List
Table C-1. General administrative inspection criteria checklist .................................................. 92
Table C-2. General inspection criteria checklist .......................................................................... 92
Table C-3. IMT obstacle course administrative general inspection criteria ................................ 99
Table C-4. IMT obstacle course general inspection criteria ...................................................... 100
Table C-5. The tough one checklist ........................................................................................... 103
Table C-6. Inverted rope descent/the slide for life .................................................................... 105
Table C-7. Confidence climb checklist ...................................................................................... 108
Table C-8. Skyscraper checklist ................................................................................................ 110
Table C-9. Belly Robber checklist ............................................................................................. 112
Table C-10. The Tarzan checklist ............................................................................................ 113
Table C-11. Low belly over checklist ........................................................................................ 114
Table C-12. The dirty name checklist ........................................................................................ 115
Table C-13. The tough nut checklist .......................................................................................... 116
Table C-14. Belly crawl checklist .............................................................................................. 117
3
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-15. Inclining wall checklist .......................................................................................... 118

Table C-16. Swing, stop, and jump checklist ............................................................................ 119
Table C-17. Six vaults checklist ................................................................................................ 120
Table C-18. Easy balancer checklist .......................................................................................... 121
Table C-19. Low wire checklist ................................................................................................. 122
Table C-20. The belly buster checklist ...................................................................................... 123
Table C-21. Hip-hip checklist .................................................................................................... 124
Table C-22. Reverse climb checklist ......................................................................................... 125
Table C-23. The weaver checklist ............................................................................................. 126
Table C-24. Balancing logs checklist ........................................................................................ 127
Table C-25. Island hoppers checklist ......................................................................................... 128
Table C-26. Fitness tower checklist ........................................................................................... 129
Table D-1. Rappel tower inspection criteria checklist ............................................................... 135
Figure List
Figure C-1. IMT conditioning/endurance course evaluator information checklist...................... 91
Figure C-2. Obstacles for jumping............................................................................................... 94
Figure C-3. Obstacles for dodging ............................................................................................... 95
Figure C-4. Obstacles for vertical climbing and surmounting..................................................... 95
Figure C-5. Obstacles for horizontal traversing........................................................................... 95
Figure C-6. Obstacles for crawling .............................................................................................. 96
Figure C-7. Obstacle for vaulting ................................................................................................ 96
Figure C-8. Obstacle for balancing .............................................................................................. 97
Figure C-9. IMT obstacle course evaluator information ............................................................. 98
Figure C-10. The tough one ....................................................................................................... 104
Figure C-11. Inverted rope descent/the slide for life ................................................................. 107
Figure C-12. Confidence climb.................................................................................................. 109
Figure C-13. Skyscraper ............................................................................................................ 111
Figure C-14. Belly robber .......................................................................................................... 112
Figure C-16. Low belly over ...................................................................................................... 114
Figure C-17. The dirty name ...................................................................................................... 115
Figure C-18. The tough nut ........................................................................................................ 116
Figure C-19. Belly crawl............................................................................................................ 117
Figure C-20. Inclining wall ........................................................................................................ 118
Figure C-21. Swing, stop, and jump .......................................................................................... 119
Figure C-22. Six vaults .............................................................................................................. 120
Figure C-23. Easy balancer ........................................................................................................ 121
Figure C-24. Low wire ............................................................................................................... 122
Figure C-25. Belly buster........................................................................................................... 123
Figure C-26. Hip-hip .................................................................................................................. 124
Figure C-27. Reverse climb ....................................................................................................... 125
Figure C-28. The weaver ........................................................................................................... 126
Figure C-29. Balancing logs ...................................................................................................... 127
Figure C-30. Island hoppers ....................................................................................................... 128
Figure D-1. Rappel tower site inspection information............................................................... 134
4
TRADOC Pam 385-1
5
TRADOC Pam 385-1
This page left blank intentionally.
Chapter 1
Introduction
1-1. Purpose
a. This publication provides commanders and safety managers a model for a safety and
occupational health program, defines standards, and addresses those basic safety program
elements necessary for implementation of effective safety and accident prevention programs as
outlined in Army Regulation (AR) 385-10 and U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
(TRADOC) Regulation 385-2. Commanders may tailor this publication to meet their needs and
local conditions to accomplish the TRADOC mission.
b. The self-assessment guide provides commanders and safety managers a standardized

method to assess the scope and effectiveness of a comprehensive safety and occupational health
program. The self-assessment guide consists of several checklists that provide a systematic
method to assess safety program implementation. Additionally, because no checklist is all
inclusive, safety professionals must utilize applicable safety laws, statutes, codes, and regulations
to assist the command and leaders in implementing an effective and compliant safety program.
1-2. References
Required and related publications are listed in appendix A.
6
TRADOC Pam 385-1
1-3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms

Abbreviations and special terms used in this pamphlet are explained in the glossary.
Chapter 2
Safety Program Overview
2-1. Standard
The TRADOC Model Safety Program is based on the legal and regulatory requirements of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 6055.1,
AR 385-10, applicable laws, statues, and codes as implemented by TRADOC Regulation 385-2.
Public law, executive orders, DODIs, and Army regulations direct actions to furnish employees
with places and conditions of employment that are free from recognized hazards causing, or
likely to cause, death or serious physical harm; and apply composite risk management (CRM)
strategies to eliminate accidents, death, and occupational illnesses. Commanders at all levels
should provide employees with places and conditions of employment that are free from
recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm, and establish procedures to
ensure employees are not subjected to restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal
for filing a report of an unsafe or unhealthful working condition. An effective program is:
a. Comprehensive in application, built around and addresses all core functions and enduring
missions of the Army and TRADOC.
b. Adequately resourced, staffed, and funded to support the Army and TRADOC mission.
Ensure leaders, supervisors, managers, and individuals are empowered with the requisite
training, authority, information, and resources to execute their duties safely. Focus safety on all
areas of risk by employing sound CRM practices.
c. Universal in scope, providing effective support to current operations, yet remaining

sufficiently flexible to support future operations. Not a static program, the safety program is
tailored to the existing operational environment and updated as required by accident experience
and lessons learned.
2-2. Safety program success

The ability to implement, manage, and measure an effective safety program, and the ultimate
success of the model program depend on three enduring threads of continuity:
a. Ownership. Personal involvement of commanders, leaders, and supervisors at each level of

command/organization sets the focus and direction of safety program and accident prevention
efforts. It empowers Soldiers and workers with the authority to implement the safety mission.
b. Oversight. A qualified safety manager (as defined in AR 385-10 and the Office of
Personnel Management standards), with direct and unimpeded access to the commander, is
essential. This ensures commanders maintain a situational awareness of the effectiveness of
CRM implementation and safety program effectiveness, and reinforces the credibility of the
safety manager in dealing with other staff elements.
7
TRADOC Pam 385-1
c. Standards. The safety program document sets the standard for each individual safety
program and sub-elements of that program. A written safety program document clearly defines
the commander’s intent, fixes responsibility and accountability, and formally defines
requirements for acceptable performance.
______________________________________________________________________________
Chapter 3
Safety Program Elements
3-1. Composite risk management (CRM)
a. CRM is the Army’s primary decisionmaking process for identifying hazards and
controlling risks across the full spectrum of Army missions, functions, operations, and activities.
A CRM based safety program puts into place a systematic, disciplined, management process that
focuses on priorities so that the mission is accomplished without unnecessary risk. CRM:
(1) Fosters initiative and further freedom of action by defining risk parameters within
which an operation must remain, rather than imposing unnecessary restrictions or limitations on
leaders.
(2) Creates an operational climate that promotes mission accomplishment with minimal
risk.
(3) Is dependent upon two critical elements for effectiveness:
(a) First, leaders must understand the decisionmaking process of CRM.
(b) Second, there must be a system in place to effectively deal with changes in mission or
activity risk levels due to changes in circumstances or conditions.
b. Commanders/commandants must ensure CRM is institutionalized in all school products,

training courses, and combat training center programs. Service school graduates must be trained
and proficient in assessing and managing risk in both training and operational environments. A
CRM structure and control system must also be in place to ensure on the ground leadership
presence at the appropriate level for all high and moderate risk training. Leaders must also
clearly define risk decision authority to include the role/responsibility in the approval process for
executing high and moderate risk training, ensure the conduct of initial and periodic on the
ground review or “lane proofing” of all recurring training activities, provide clear guidance on
where risk decision authority lies, and where possible, get risk decisions ahead of time where
risk is known and understood. Risk decision authority must be clearly understood and enacted.
The primary tenets of effective CRM are that commanders accept no risk unless the potential
benefit outweighs the potential loss and that risk decisions are made at the appropriate level.
Appropriate risk decision authority (residual risk) in accordance with TRADOC
Regulation 385-2 follows:
(1) Extremely high risk: Senior commander of general officer grade.
8
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(2) High risk: Colonel or equivalent grade, as designated by the senior commander.
(3) Moderate risk: Lieutenant colonel or equivalent grade, and command sergeants major
serving as noncommissioned officer (NCO) academy or command sergeants major academy
commandants, as designated by the senior commander.
(4) Low risk: As designated by the senior commander.
c. Commanders should establish and publish a CRM standard that incorporates this guidance
and designates risk decision authority consistent with TRADOC criteria. Risk decisions are
based on the residual risk of an activity, after application of appropriate control measures. They
are briefed one level up the chain of command from the decisionmaker.
3-2. Inspections, assessments, and evaluations

Safety assessments and evaluations are important tools in effectively identifying hazards and
controlling risk and provide a safe and healthful workplace. Safety assessments may be the
result of an unusual occurrence or an out of the ordinary planned activity. In all cases,
inspections, assessments, and evaluations are oriented toward the identification of hazards or
measuring the effectiveness of accident prevention efforts, not the effectiveness of the command
or leadership. An aggressive safety and occupational health inspection program ensures that all
workplaces are inspected on an annual basis. See paragraph 4-1b for implementation and use of
inspections.
3-3. Hazard abatement
Law and regulation direct that hazards be eliminated on a worst first basis. To ensure that the
worst hazards are corrected first, coordinate the listing of all safety and occupational related
hazards with the Garrison Safety Office for integration into a single garrison hazards abatement
log maintained by the garrison safety manager. Hazards may be identified by a variety of means,
such as inspections, accidents, routine maintenance and repair operation, or requests (work
orders/job orders, customer reports, etc.) for repair or replacement of material or facilities. To
ensure all hazards are correctly assessed and included in the garrison hazard abatement log,
ensure the garrison safety manager reviews and validates all work orders, job orders, or
requisitions that have a safety or occupational health connection. Once a violation or hazard is
identified, the safety manager or a qualified safety professional must ensure it is risk assessed in
terms of hazards severity and accident probability. This assessment is expressed in terms of a
risk assessment code (RAC) which identifies the relative seriousness of the hazard. Prepare a
garrison abatement plan for each RAC 1 or 2 hazard when the correction exceeds 30 days.
3-4. Accident reporting, investigation, and analysis

Accident investigations and careful analysis of accident information provides the safety manager
with the means to identify potential sources of future accidents and to develop and implement
countermeasures. Ensure the command accident prevention program also supports the Garrison
Civilian Personnel Office’s effort to reduce injuries and occupational illnesses. In addition to the
accident reports Department of the Army (DA) Pam 385-40 requires near-miss information is
important in identifying hazards before they can result in serious damage or injury. Trained
additional duty safety officers (ADSO) or collateral duty safety officers (CDSOs), and first-line
9
TRADOC Pam 385-1
supervisors are the best sources for this information. Other important sources of accident
information are military police blotter reports, hospital admission and discharge sheets, sick call
slips, and estimated cost of damage reports from the General Services Administration and unit
motor pools. When collected, organized, and analyzed, this information may yield valuable data
on potential problems or hazards, education/training shortfalls, motivation or leadership issues,
procedural or standard inadequacies, or other potential problem areas. These potential problems,
hazards, or shortfalls may often go unnoticed or undetected, because individual units and
organizations view them as isolated instances. A successful accident prevention program will be
one in which accident data and statistics are used strictly for accident prevention purposes, not to
attempt to document command or leadership effectiveness.
3-5. Education, training, and safety awareness

The prevention of accidents and the associated mission impact and loss of resources is the
responsibility of every member of the Army team. Law and regulation require training for all
Army personnel, Soldiers and civilians, commensurate with their duties and responsibilities. The
most effective accident prevention program recognizes this and sustains an extensive, ongoing
program of safety training to educate, motivate, and raise safety awareness. Commanders,
leaders, and supervisors at all levels, as well as individual Soldiers and civilian employees, are
important in the accident prevention process. The effectiveness of their contributions, however,
depends on their knowledge and understanding of safety and CRM and their responsibility in the
Army Safety Program.
3-6. Branch safety/CRM integration

Integration of safety and CRM into Army doctrine, organizations, training, materiel, leadership
and education, personnel, and facilities is inherent in the worldwide branch safety mission.
Unlike safety managers within other Army commands, TRADOC safety managers have
worldwide branch safety mission responsibility. In addition to the safety and CRM integration
mission, branch safety managers monitor the operations, training, equipment, and tactics,
techniques, and procedures within their specific branch. For this reason, TRADOC standards
dictate that the qualified command safety and occupational health manager is rated by, and
reports directly to the senior commander, school commandant, or respective chief of staff.
3-7. Additional/Collateral duty safety program

The trained ADSO/CDSO is essential to the safety manager’s ability to reach all levels of
command, gather accident prevention information, identify hazards, and meet legal and
regulatory requirements. Additional/collateral duty safety personnel may conduct inspections of
low risk workplaces, but only when they are trained to identify hazards and recommend
appropriate abatement action. A good safety program provides training in addition to the online
ADSO/CDSO course, so that trained safety professionals are free to devote their time and energy
to dealing with the more serious safety issues that require extensive technical expertise.
ADSO/CDSOs collect accident reports for their activities or units. They are the local
commander’s safety representative and an important source of information at the grass root level
in gauging the effectiveness of the commander’s safety program.
10
TRADOC Pam 385-1
3-8. Safety and Occupational Health Advisory Council (SOHAC)

An active SOHAC, chaired by the commander/commandant/chief of staff, meeting regularly,
and composed of military and civilian management and operating personnel membership,
is necessary for the effective interchange of safety and occupational health information.
Participation of the commander/commandant/chief of staff demonstrates command support and
sets the tone for the safety/accident prevention program. Command visibility and active
participation in the safety council sends a powerful message to subordinate commanders and
staff on the importance of safety.
3-9. Emergency action plans

Preplanned, coordinated, and regularly tested emergency action, disaster preparedness, and
pre-accident plans are proven methods to minimize loss of life and property damage due to
natural or man-made disasters. Commanders/commandants should coordinate and integrate their
needs into garrison emergency action, disaster preparedness, and pre-accident plans as
appropriate to their mission. Safety managers should develop, coordinate, publish, and test
pre-accident plans for both ground and aviation accidents and assist the garrison in development,
coordination, and maintenance of emergency action and disaster preparedness plans.
3-10. Initial military training (IMT)

The safety and well-being of Soldiers during their IMT is critical to the success of the TRADOC
training mission. Soldiers arriving at Army reception battalions come from many differing
backgrounds and in differing levels of physical condition. Similarly, cadets and newly-appointed
officers also exhibit some of that diversity. Consequently, some may be at a greater risk of
injury/illness. Safety directors with an IMT mission should develop and implement an
aggressive accident prevention strategy to provide these Soldiers a training environment that
facilitates their transition from civilian to military life.
3-11. Motor vehicle accident prevention

An enduring threat and a serious problem to TRADOC and the Army is the tragic loss of
Soldiers and civilian workers in vehicle accidents. Privately owned vehicle (POV) accidents
continue as the single leading cause of accidental death for our Soldiers, civilians, and their
Family members. This needless loss of life demands actions. Commands with aggressive motor
vehicle accident prevention strategies and programs enjoy greater success at reducing the
incidence of motor vehicles and POV accidents than those commands that do not. All successful
motor vehicle and POV accident prevention programs start with active command involvement.
Other program elements common to an effective POV prevention programs include driver/rider
training initiatives, a functioning POV task force, motorcycle mentorship, and the involvement
of the first-line leaders. Leaders must make every effort to use other available tools to combat
the rising incidence of vehicular accidents.
Chapter 4
Self-Assessment Guide
4-1. Implementation and use
11
TRADOC Pam 385-1
a. Safety assessments and evaluations are important tools to effectively identify hazards and
control risk. Orient inspections, assessments, and evaluations on identification of hazards or
assessment of the effectiveness of accident prevention efforts, not the effectiveness of the
command or leadership.
b. An aggressive safety and occupational health inspection program ensures that all
workplaces are inspected on an annual basis. Facilities or operations involving special hazards
may be inspected more frequently. Qualified safety and occupational health professionals should
conduct inspections and provide written reports of violations to the head of the activity or the
commander of the unit/organization inspected. The self-assessment guide and associated
checklists in appendix B provide commanders and safety managers an effective tool to document
the scope and effectiveness of their safety and accident prevention efforts.
4-2. Standards/documentation
Documentation of program elements serves as an indication of program effectiveness.
Documentation such as local policies, regulations, or standing operating procedures (SOPs);
however, do not in themselves ensure program implementation. Ensure documentation is
relevant, current, and in accordance with the appropriate standards. Make sure users are familiar
with their existence and content; and the standards are applied to the relevant events or
operations.
4-3. Application
The self-assessment guide (see appendix B) and conditioning/obstacle course criteria (see
appendix C) consist of a series of checklists that provide a systematic, standardized means to
evaluate/assess the compliance of program elements with directives, legal standards, and
regulations. Each provides the user the appropriate reference for the requirement, as well as a
recommended documentation to assess implementation. The self-assessment guide is not all
inclusive of every safety requirement required by public law, statute, and regulation. Therefore,
research applicable public law, statute, and regulation that pertain to your command and
situation.
____________________________________________________________________________
Appendix A
References
Section I
Required Publications
AR 25-400-2
The Army Records Information Management System (ARIMS)
AR 40-5
Preventive Medicine
AR 95-1
Flight Regulations
12
TRADOC Pam 385-1
AR 350-1
Army Training and Leader Development
AR 385-10
The Army Safety Program
AR 385-63
Range Safety
AR 420-1
Army Facilities Management
AR 500-3
U.S. Army Continuity of Operations Program Policy and Planning
AR 600-55
The Army Driver and Operator Standardization Program (Selection, Training, Testing, and
Licensing)
DA Pam 385-10
Army Safety Program
DA Pam 385-16
System Safety Management Guide
DA Pam 385-24
The Army Radiation Safety Program
DA Pam 385-30
Mishap Risk Management
DA Pam 385-40
Army Accident Investigation and Reporting
DA Pam 385-61
Toxic Chemical Agent Safety Standards
DA Pam 385-63
Range Safety
DA Pam 385-64
Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards
DA Pam 385-65
Explosive and Chemical Site Plan Development and Submission
DA Pam 385-90
13
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Army Aviation Accident Prevention
DA Pam 420-10
Space Management Guide
Department of Defense Directive 5000.1

The Defense Acquisition Team
Department of Defense Directive 6055.9E

Department of Defense (DOD) Explosives Safety Management and DOD Explosives Safety
Board
DODI 6055.1
DOD Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) Program
DODI 6055.04
DOD Traffic Safety Program
FM 3-25.150
Combatives
FM 5-19
Composite Risk Management
FM 6-0
Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces
FM 21-10
Field Hygiene and Sanitation
TB MED 530
Food Service Sanitation
Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1200
Title 23 CFR 1230

Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Programs
Title 29 CFR 1910

Occupational Safety and Health Standards
Title 29 CFR 1926

Construction Standards
Title 29 CFR 1960

Basic Program Elements for Federal Employees Occupational Safety and Health Administration
14
TRADOC Pam 385-1
TRADOC Regulation 350-6

Enlisted Initial Entry Training Policies and Administration

Drill Sergeant Program

Prevention of Heat and Cold Casualties

Systems Approach to Training Management, Process, and Procedures

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Safety Program
TC 3-22.20
Army Physical Readiness Training
TC 21-24
Rappelling
"Operational and Training Facilities" Corps of Engineers Drawing Number DEF 028-13-95
National Fire Protection Association 72
Section II
Related Publications
AR 15-6
Procedures for Investigating Officers and Boards of Officers
AR 50-6
Chemical Surety
AR 70-1
Army Acquisition Policy
AR 75-1
Malfunctions Involving Ammunition and Explosives
AR 200-1
Environmental Protection and Enhancement
AR 215-1
Military Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Programs and Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities
15
TRADOC Pam 385-1
AR 335-15
Management Information Control System
AR 350-90
The Army Sustainable Range Program
AR 600-8-22
Military Awards
AR 672-20
Incentive Awards
AR 690-950
Career Management
AR 700-141
Hazardous Materials Information Resource System
AR 870-20
Army Museums, Historical Artifacts, and Art
DA Pam 385-40
Army Accident Investigation and Reporting
DODI 4500.9-R, part II

Defense Transportation Regulation (Cargo Movement)
DODI 6050.05
DOD Hazard Communication Program
DODI 6055.06
DOD Fire and Emergency Services Program
DODI 6055.07
Accident Investigation, Reporting and Recordkeeping
DODI 6055.08
Occupational Ionizing Radiation Protection Program
DODI 6055.09-M
DOD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Manual
DODI 6055.11
Protecting Personnel from Electromagnetic Fields
16
TRADOC Pam 385-1
DODI 6055.12
Hearing Conservation Program
DODI 6055.15
DOD Laser Protection Program
FM 3-0
Operations
FM 10-67-1
Concepts and Equipment of Petroleum Operations
TB MED 575
Swimming Pools and Bathing Facilities
TC 5-210
Military Float Bridging Equipment
TC 3-22.20
Army Physical Readiness Training
TC 21-21
Water Survival Training
TC 21-305
Training Program for Wheeled Vehicle Accident Avoidance
Title 10 CFR 19
Notices, Instructions, and Reports to Workers: Inspection and Investigations
Title 10 CFR 20
Standards for Protection Against Radiation
Title 29 CFR 1926.59

Hazard Communication
Title 33 CFR 183

Boats and Associated Equipment
Section III
Prescribed Form
This section contains no entries.
17
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Section IV
Referenced Forms
DA Form 1045
Army Ideas for Excellence Program (AIEP) Proposal
DA Form 2028
Recommended Changes to Publication and Blank Forms
DA Form 2609
Historical Property Catalog
DA Form 2696
Operational Hazard Reports
DA Form 4754
Violation Inventory Log
DA Form 4755
Report of Alleged Unsafe or Unhealthful Working Conditions
DA Form 5752-R
Rope Log (Usage and History)
DA Form 7306
Worksheet for Telephonic Notification of Ground Accident
Occupational Safety and Health Administration Form 300

Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses
Standard Form 91
Motor Vehicle Accident Report
18
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Appendix B
Self-Assessment Guide
B-1. Program management

Program management is a core element of the TRADOC safety program. Program management
requirements apply to all TRADOC operations and activities in accordance with AR 385-10, and
applicable laws, statutes, codes, and regulations. The self-assessment checklist for program
management appears in table B-1.
Table B-1 Program management

Program Management YES NO Remarks
Has commander/commandant established a SOH to protect
personnel, equipment, and facilities that is emphasized,
1
resourced, and ensures a vital organization-wide safety
program that includes:
(1) General safety requirements (Required)
(2) Strategic Planning, Army Safety Program Structure,
Safety Program Evaluation, Councils, and Committees
(Required)
(3) Accident investigation and reporting (Required)
(4) Contracting safety (Required)
(5) Explosives/Range safety management (Mission dictated)
(6) Public, family, off-duty recreation and seasonal safety
(Required)
(7) Radiation safety management (Mission dictated)
(8) Safety awards program (Required)
(9) System safety management (Mission dictated)
(10) Training requirements (Required)
(11) Motor vehicle accident prevention (Required)
(12) Force Mobilization (Mission dictated)
(13) Tactical safety (Mission dictated)
(14) Safe cargo operations (Required)
(15) Aviation safety management (Mission dictated)
(16) Occupational safety and health program (Required)
(17) Workplace inspections (Required)
(18) Industrial Operational Safety (Required)
19
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Program Management continued YES NO Remarks

(19) Emergency Planning and Response (Required)
(20) Biological Defense Safety (Mission dictated)
(21) Chemical Agent Safety Management (Mission
dictated)
(22) Marine activities (Required)
(23) Medical Safety (Mission dictated)
(24) Facility Reuse and Closure (Required)
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(9), Table 1-1
Documentation: Safety regulation, SOPs, memorandums,

and training records.
Does the commander/commandant have a single source

safety and occupational health regulation/program
2
document that prescribes policy, responsibilities, and key
safety and occupational health principles?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-1, 1-5a-d, 1-6, 1-9.
Documentation: Command safety regulation, SOP,

memorandums, and training records.
Has the commander/commandant established strategic

goals, metrics and plans required to achieve those goals
that are addressed as a section in the Safety and
3 Occupational Health (SOH) regulation/program document,
with annual organizational accident prevention goals and
objectives that incorporates TRADOC’s annual goals and
objectives?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-1; DA Pam 385-10,

paragraph 2-1.
Documentation: Goals and strategic plan on hand and

implemented.
20
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Program management continued YES NO Remarks

Is the command safety office/organization funded and
fully resourced to execute all responsibilities and
4
functions designated in respective safety regulation to
assure safety program effectiveness?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-6c.
Documentation: Budget/Table of distribution &

allowances (TDA)
Is the command structured and staffed to administer a

safety and occupational health program through the
5 chain of command that is based upon the
organization’s mission, goals, and objectives as well as
statutory requirements?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs 2-5a and 2-6a, 2-6b

and DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 3-3.
Documentation: (TDA)
Does the safety manager develop policy and

procedures for the integration of safety and
6
occupational health, CRM, and accident prevention
activities of the command?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 3-2c(4).
Documentation: Policies, SOP, and regulation.
Has commander/commandant co-located mission and

7 garrison safety resources into a single safety
organization reporting to the senior commander?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-

4e(3).
Documentation: Regulation, SOP, policy,

organizational diagram, and TDA.
21
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is the safety manager a member of the commander’s/
8 commandant’s special staff reporting directly to the
commander or the chief of staff?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-7e.
Documentation: Organizational chart/rating chart.
Does the safety director/manager meet the U.S. Office of

9 Personnel Management (OPM) standards for the positions
of Occupational Safety and Health, GS 0018/0803?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-7e.
Documentation: Review safety manager/director’s job

description.
Is the safety and occupational health office staffed with

10 professional safety personnel meeting the requirements for
these positions established by OPM?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-7f, TRADOC

Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-4f(4).
Documentation: Review position descriptions.
Are safety professionals receiving adequate training to

11
perform their duties in accordance with 29 CFR 1960?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 10-4, 29 CFR 1960.
Documentation: Individual development plans and

training records.
Does the safety manager assist all elements of the

12 command in the implementation of the strategic safety
plan?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 3-2c(2).
Documentation: Published strategic safety plan.
22
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are command procedures published to implement
effective public, family, sports, and off-duty
13
recreation safety programs; identify responsibilities
for all subordinate organizations and installations?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapter 6; DA Pam 385-10,

chapter 5.
Documentation: Safety documentation (i.e.,

regulation, standard memorandum, etc.)
Has the commander/commandant established,

resourced, and implemented a safety program for
14
water recreational activities to include boating
(lifeguards present)?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs 6-6 and 6-7;

TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 9-2a(4).
Documentation: Regulation, SOPs, lesson plans, and

attendance records.
Does the commander/commandant develop and

implement procedures to ensure Soldiers have applied
CRM to their leave, pass, temporary duty, or
15
permanent change of station travel plans, which
involve driving out of the local area, as determined by
the commander.
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs 6-3a; 6-3a(1).
Documentation: Copy of Travel Risk Planning

System (TRiPS), risk assessments, counseling or
regulation, policy memorandums, and SOP.
23
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Does the commander/commandant develop and
administer promotional programs and procedures to
16 increase awareness of the specific hazards associated
with the change of seasons and celebration of
holidays?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 6-4.
Documentation: Promotional items on hand, safety

memorandums, advertisements; i.e., safety shows,
training documentation.
Does the safety office review command sponsored

17
safety requirements for sporting events?
Documentation: Sporting safety information

documents. Submission of safety requirements to
installation safety.
Has a SOHAC or Soldier and Army Civilian

18 Employee Safety Committee been established that
meets at least semiannually?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-24, TRADOC

Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-8.
Documentation: Signed minutes and attendance roster

from council.
24
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Program management (continued) YES NO Remarks

Do subordinate units not staffed with safety
19 professionals appoint additional/collateral duty safety
personnel by written orders?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-7g.
Documentation: Audit, inspections, evaluation

reports, or copies of current additional duty orders.
Does safety office provide additional training to

20
additional duty safety officers ADSOs and CDSOs?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 10-8(b).
Documentation: Lessons plans, attendance rosters,

certificate of completion of training.
Does the command ensure that ADSOs/CDSOs are:

Appointed by commander on written orders. Are
commissioned officers at battalion and higher unit
levels in the rank of staff sergeant or higher at the
21
company level with 1 year or more retainability in the
unit at appointed?
Report directly to commander safety related matters.
Coordinate activities with safety office.
Documentation: Review ADSO/CDSO roster and

orders.
Has the commander/commandant established

accountability for safety and occupational health
22
through the performance evaluation system and
performance counseling sessions?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-5c(5).
Documentation: Policy, memorandums, regulation,

SOPs.
25
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is the safety office represented on the Emergency
23 Planning Team/Crisis Action Team/Continuity of
Operations Program?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 10-4a;

AR 500-3.
Documentation: Attendance roster and minutes from

Emergency Planning Team meetings.
Have formal agreements been developed with tenant or

24
other organizations as necessary?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-5a(3); TRADOC

Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-6a.
Documentation: Memorandum of agreement.
Have battalion commanders registered in the web-

25 based Army Readiness Assessment Program within 90
days of assuming command?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-

4(f)(15).
Documentation: TRADOC Army Readiness

Assessment Program Report, tracking database,
documentation of completion.
Have battalion commanders conducted a follow-up Army

Readiness Assessment Program assessment at mid-tour or
26
12 months in command, to evaluate unit progress against
initial results?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph

1-4(f)(15).
Documentation: TRADOC Army Readiness Assessment

Program Report, tracking database, documentation of
completion.
26
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is safety integrated into the contracting process? Are
27 contracts in accordance with the requirements and
reviewed by safety office?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapter 4.
Documentation: Copies of contracts.
Does contracting officer representative monitor

28
contractor(s) safety and training program?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 4-4
Documentation: Written record of meetings with

contracting officer representative and contractors.
Mobilization (as required) have leaders at all levels

29 established a command climate that promotes safety and
health during pre and post mobilization/integration?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapter 12.
Documentation: Command policy.
Are cargo operations conducted safely IAW public law,

30
statutes, and regulation?
Reference: AR 385-10, chapter 14.
Documentation: SOP, risk assessments on hand.
27
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Program Management (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does safety director ensure the implementation of
31
industrial safety requirements?
Reference: AR 385-10, DA Pam 385-10, TRADOC

Documentation: Safety inspection of operation on file.
Installation safety director ensures public, family, off-duty

32
recreation, and seasonal safety programs are implemented.
Reference: AR 385-10, TRADOC Regulation 385-2,

paragraph 13-5.
Documentation: Written public, family, off-duty,

recreational, and seasonal safety policy, SOP, regulation
on hand.
Does safety director with an individual mobilization

33 mission oversee and monitor mobilization safety program
IAW applicable regulations?
Reference: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 13-6.
Documentation: Individual mobilization training support

package (TSP), SOP, regulation, or policy on hand.
28
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-2. Education and training

Commanders and/or supervisors shall ensure that required safety education and training is
scheduled, conducted, and documented that includes but not limited to: personal protective
equipment; general safety requirements particular to the operation; CRM mitigation techniques
and controls; special safety requirements; lessons learned from previous operations; procedures
for reporting and responding to accidents; identification of all known and perceived accidents.
See table B-2 for the self-assessment checklist for education and training.
Table B-2 Education and training

YES NO Remarks
Are leaders provided specialized training to enable them to
1 execute their safety and occupational health and CRM
leadership responsibilities properly?
Documentation: Training requirements, lesson plans, and

attendance rosters.
Have leaders and managers integrated CRM into all Army

2
processes and operations?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 10-3(a) TRADOC

Composite Risk Management Integration Plan.
Documentation: Review SOPs, policies, regulation, lesson

plans, and operation orders.
Does the safety office monitor the command to ensure all

3 Army personnel are provided CRM training in areas
needed for a safe and efficient execution of their tasks?
Documentation: Inspection reports that document CRM

training for instructors, cadre, training developers, combat
developers, and drill sergeants, etc.
29
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Education and training (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does safety office conduct evaluations to ensure that
4 personnel receive adequate training to perform their duties
in accordance with 29 CFR 1960?
Standard: 29 CFR 1960; AR 385-10, paragraph 10-4.
Documentation: Inspections and reports.
Have commanders and other personnel required to

5 complete the online Commander’s Safety Course have
documentation on hand?
Documentation: Training records.
Does command have a written Hazard Communication

Program that is implemented and maintained at each level
6
of activity and are workers receiving hazard
communication training?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 16-2d(2); DA Pam

385-10, paragraph 14-2.
Documentation: Written program, training records, lesson

plans, and attendance rosters.
Does commander/commandant representative evaluate

subordinate commands to ensure safety policies and
7
procedures are established to ensure employees are
provided appropriate job training?
Standard: 29 CFR 1960; AR 385-10, paragraph 10-4.
Documentation: Lesson plans, attendance roster, and

certificates of completion.
30
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Education and training (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does the command require supervisors to ensure
employees have sufficient training, licensure,
8
qualification, and experience prior to assignment to a
particular job or activity?
Documentation: Policy, SOP, and Organization

Inspection Program checklist.
31
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-3. Safety awards and promotion

Safety awards and promotion are an effective part of a safety program that enhance Army
operations and improve safety and CRM awareness through recognition and promotion of
individual and organizational accident prevention methods and successes. See table B-3 for the
self-assessment checklist for promotion and awards.
Table B-3 Safety awards and promotions

YES NO Remarks
Does the command publish holiday, seasonal, and special
hazard safety alerts, messages, and bulletins to raise safety
1
awareness during periods of increased risk, or alert the
commander of special seasonal hazards?
Documentation: Copy of safety messages, safety alerts, etc.
Does the safety office budget, procure and issue

2
promotional items?
Standard: AR 385-10 paragraph 10-9; TRADOC

Documentation: SOP, policy letters, and inventory of

items on hand.
3 Does commander have an active safety awards program?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapter 8; TRADOC Regulation

385-2, paragraph 5-2b(1).
Documentation: Program documentation, copies of

awards.
Do commanders at all levels promote and implement the

4
Safety Awards Program?

385-2, paragraph 5-3.
32
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Safety and occupational health council,

staff meetings, e-mail, local papers, flyers, posters, etc.
Safety awards and promotions (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does the safety office distribute educational and
5 marketing information on the Army’s Safety Awards
Program?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 8-7; TRADOC

Documentation: Promotion and educational material.
6 Does the safety office have an active unit safety

certification program?
Documentation: Unit safety certificates.
33
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-4. Workplace safety, inspections, hazard analysis, and countermeasures development

Inspections measure adequacy and/or determine effectiveness of controls in achieving workplace
safety. In TRADOC training areas, classrooms, and ranges may be the place of work. Safety
managers collect, review, and analyze data from various sources to identify trends, systemic
deficiencies, or profiles for use in establishing program initiatives and priorities. Safety
managers develop countermeasures to correct deficiencies and/or eliminate or reduce hazards.
The self-assessment checklist for workplace safety, inspections, hazard analysis, and
countermeasures development is found at table B-4.
Table B-4 Workplace safety, inspections, hazards analysis, and countermeasures

development
YES NO Remarks
Has the safety director ensured that job hazard analysis
has been conducted and level of risk identified for all
1 workplaces that include industrial operations, safe cargo
operations, training areas, and other applicable
operations?
Standard: AR 385-10; chapters 1, 3-5, 7, 10, 13-18, 21,

22; DA Pam 385-10, paragraphs 8-2, 8-3, 8-5; DA Pam
385-30, paragraph 2-12.
Documentation: Written or electronic list indicating

buildings, facilities, and operations with level of risks
assigned.
Are civilian and military operations conducted in

accordance with requirements such as safe cargo, marine
2
activities, radiation, and industrial operations, etc in order
to provide a safe and healthful workplace?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapters 1, 3-5, 7, 10, 13-18, 21,

and 22; DA Pam 385-10.
Documentation: Regulation, SOPs, TSPs, memorandum.
Has commander/commandant developed and

implemented a safety and occupational health inspection
3
program audit that ensures each subordinate organization
is evaluated at least every 12 to 18 months?
34
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Inspection schedules and reports.

Workplace safety, inspections, hazards analysis, and
YES NO Remarks
countermeasures development (continued)
Are barracks inspected at least annually by a qualified
safety and health professional or competent specially
4 trained personnel? Are dining facilities inspected at
least semiannually by safety, fire department, and
preventive medicine?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 17-6a, g; AR 40-5,

paragraph 1-7d(2); DA Pam 40-11, 5-20; TRADOC
Regulation 350-6 L-2 a and b.
Documentation: Copies of inspection reports.
Are qualified safety and occupational health

5 professionals or specially trained competent personnel
conducting the inspections?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 17-6a.
Documentation: Training records.
Is the safety office using performance indicators and

6
matrices in executing their inspection program?
Documentation: Inspection reports and performance

indicators.
Does the safety office validate all RAC 1 or RAC 2

7
work orders/projects?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 8-5.
Documentation: Review hazard abatement plan and

safety inspection reports.
35
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
Does the safety office have a system established and
8 implemented to ensure corrective action is completed in
a timely manner?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, chapter 8.
Documentation: Copies of response indicating

corrective action and verification.
Is there a program or policy for reporting unsafe or

9
unhealthful conditions?
Documentation: Copies of DA Form 4755 (Report of

Alleged Unsafe or Unhealthful Working Conditions).
Does the commander/commandant have a policy in place

requiring supervisors to develop an accident prevention
10
and response plan for each activity under their direct
control and administration?
Documentation: SOP, policy, and regulations.
Are facility fire alarms and smoke detectors installed,

11
serviceable, and tested periodically?
Standard: National Fire Protection Association

72 – National Fire Alarm Code, and 29 CFR 1910.164
(b)(2), (c)(2).
Documentation: Inspect and test equipment.
36
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
Are identified (safety or health-related) deficiencies
12
corrected in a timely manner?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraphs 8-2, 8-5.
Documentation: Date of identification versus date of

correction.
Is personal protective equipment provided, used, and

13
maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 8-2, table C-3; 29

CFR 1910.132-138; 1910.147.
Documentation: Maintenance documentation available on

personal protective equipment.
37
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-5. Accident investigation, reporting, and analysis

Collection and analysis of accident/incident information is critical to the accident prevention
process and takes place at several levels of command. The safety office is the command/activity
focal point for review of accident investigations, collection and analysis of accident/incident
information, and the development of timely and effective countermeasures. The self-assessment
checklist at table B-5 is provided to assist in this effort.
Table B-5 Accident investigation, reporting, and analysis

YES NO Remarks
Has the commander/commandant developed and
1 established standards and procedures to implement the
accident investigation program within their command?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(14).
Documentation: Command safety documentation (i.e.,

regulation, standard memorandum, etc.)
Does commander/commandant develop metrics for rate of

accident occurrence, severity and cost for recording and
2
review with the commander as part of the commander’s
regular oversight process?
Documentation: Accident trends and analysis.
Does the commander/commandant review accident trends

3 and analysis with subordinate commanders, directors, and
managers and discuss resolutions to causation factors?
Documentation: Copy of trends and analysis and minutes

to command safety council.
38
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Accident investigation, reporting, and analysis

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Has commander/commandant developed local training for
4 accident reporting, investigation requirements, and
analysis?
Standard: 29 CFR 1960; AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(6),

10-4.
Documentation: Training programs.
5 Are all accidents reported, investigated, and analyzed?

Regulation 385-2, 2-1(a).
Documentation: Check accident feeder reports against

files.
Is the safety office a member of the Federal Employees’

6
Compensation Act working group?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-1b.
Documentation: Check meeting roster.
Are fatality review boards and fatality after accident

7
reviews completed?
Documentation: Check submission dates of fatality after

accident reviews.
39
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Does the safety office have a system for receiving feeder
8
reports?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-7(a).
Documentation: Copy of feeder reports from military

police blotters, traffic accident reports, serious incident
reports, estimated cost of damage reports, admission and
disposition sheets, Standard Form 91(s) Motor Vehicle
Accident Report), staff judge advocate claims data,
marine casualty reports, casualty reports, and emergency
operation center reports.
Does the safety office identify trends and problem areas to

9 develop injury prevention countermeasures by
disseminating command accident data?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-7b(3).
Documentation: Reports, briefs, or meeting minutes

addressing accident analysis and trends.
Does the safety office maintain Occupational Safety and

Health Administration (OSHA) Form 300 (Work-Related
10
Injuries and Illnesses) and post a copy of the OSHA Form
300-A?
Standard: 29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3); AR 385-10, paragraph

3-8b(3)(b); TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-7c.
Documentation: Copy of OSHA Form 300 or equivalent

and copy of OSHA Form 300-A.
40
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Are all accidents/incidents in support of TRADOC’s
mission immediately reported on DA Form 7305-R
(Worksheet for Telephonic Notification of Aviation
11
Accident/Incident) or DA Form 7306-R (Worksheet for
Telephonic Notification of Ground Accident) through
appropriate channels to the TRADOC Safety Office?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-2(b).
Documentation: Reports on hand.
Are all Class A and B on-duty accidents investigated by

12
an accident investigation board?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 3-14a; TRADOC

Documentation: Written accident investigation board

results.
Are accident findings and recommendations from the U.S.

Army Combat Readiness Center/Safety Center
13
(USACR/SC) concerning branch issues and systems
resolved in a timely manner?
Documentation: Documentation of corrective action

taken.
Does the safety director provide the TRADOC Exposure

Report on a quarterly basis to the TRADOC Safety
14 Office? The completed report, reflecting the previous
quarter’s accident data, is due to the TRADOC Safety
Office by 15 Jan, 15 Apr, 15 Jul, and 15 Oct.
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 2-7(d).
Documentation: Documentation of completed TRADOC

Exposure Reports.
41
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-6. Branch and proponency

Integration of safety and CRM into doctrine, organizations, training, materiel, leadership,
education, personnel, and facilities is inherent in the worldwide branch mission.
a. Per TRADOC standard, designate the qualified command safety and occupational health
manager as the branch safety manager. The branch safety manager should work for, be rated by,
and report directly to the commander, school commandant, or the respective chief of staff.
b. Combine TRADOC mission and branch safety assets into a mission/branch safety office
and fund and staff in accordance with the appropriate manpower standards.
c. The safety office covers the full spectrum of occupational safety and health, systems safety,
schoolhouse support, CRM integration, and worldwide branch safety proponency. The self-
assessment checklist for branch safety is provided at table B-6.
Table B-6 Branch and proponency

YES NO Remarks
Are accident findings and recommendations from the
1 USACR/SC concerning branch issues and systems
resolved in a timely manner?
Documentation: Documentation of corrective action taken.
Is CRM integrated into school products, operations, branch

2 systems/materiel and reviewed by the designated SOH
officer and/or systems safety engineer?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5.
Documentation: School products (for example, technical

manuals, field manuals, TSPs, lesson plans, policy, and
doctrine).
Do the safety and occupational health specialist and/or

3 systems safety engineer maintain a hazard tracking system
to identify and track proponent system hazards?
Documentation: Written or electronic lists of reported

systems hazards.
42
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Branch and Proponency (continued) YES NO Remarks

Are all hazards controlled by procedures or training
4 addressed in the training manual and technical manuals for
those systems?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4p(3).
Documentation: Lesson plans, program of instructions,

and technical manuals.
Are instructors, cadre, training developers, combat

5 developers and drill sergeants trained in the application of
the CRM process? How was this training accomplished?

350-70.
Documentation: Attendance rosters, certificates of

completion.
Is CRM applied to all training and approved at the

6 appropriate level, and is a current copy of the risk
assessment worksheet maintained at the training site?

Documentation: Observe training, review deliberate, and

daily risk assessments.
Have the requirements of DA Pam 385-30 been applied to

7 the hazard assessment, prioritization, and correction
processes?
Documentation: Copy of hazard assessment and RAC

assignments.
43
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Does the school monitor the development of branch
specific material and develop a position on materiel
8
developer’s system safety risk assessment for proponent
materiel systems and materiel changes?

paragraph 2-6; TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph
4-2b(1).
Documentation: Memorandum stating position.
Is CRM techniques applied to eliminate or control hazards

9
associated with proponent products/systems/materiel?
Documentation: Policy, technical manuals, field manuals,

memorandums, and safety of use messages.
Have school documents and training products such as

TSPs, lesson plans, field manuals, technical manuals,
10
reviewed by the designated safety and occupational health
official.
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5f(1).

TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-27a(2).
Documentation: Documents signed by safety and

occupational health official.
Are instructors, cadre, drill sergeants, supervisors, training

11 developers trained in the application of the CRM process?
How was this training accomplished?

completion, and lesson plans.
44
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is CRM integrated into all technical and leader
12
development training within the branch?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5e.
Documentation: TSP, lesson plans, and training schedules.
Is CRM conducted for all training and approved at the

Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5d(4).

14 Are RACs assigned to each lesson plan and TSPs?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5c.
Documentation: Risk assessment codes are assigned to

lesson plans, TSPs.
45
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-7. Initial Military Training(IMT)/military training, operations and tactical safety
a. The safety of the IMT Soldier is critical to the success of the TRADOC mission to provide
the Army with military occupational specialty qualified Soldiers. Initial entry Soldiers are
subject to stress and risk in the IMT environment because the living conditions, physical
demands, and training tasks are unfamiliar and the Soldier is untried.
b. Close, consistent oversight and supervision by qualified drill sergeants, platoon sergeant,
instructors, and cadre; responsive medical support; and living and training facilities free from
known hazards are inherent requirements of the safety structure in place to protect the IMT
Soldier. An effective mission-oriented safety program, together with regular, standardized
evaluations of the IMT environment, effective training programs, and enforcement of training
standards ensures a successful soldierization program that sets high standards, provides positive
role models, and reinforces essential Soldier skills.
c. The safety and the use of CRM is paramount to the training Soldier due to the high-risk
training events that may be in encountered in advance or specialty schools such as drill sergeant,
airborne, and ranger. The use of CRM is a vital component to safely train Soldiers while
ensuring that training is realistic.
d. The risk level associated with all military training within Army and TRADOC schools are
based upon a predetermined number of qualified instructors, when the ratio of students to
instructors changes, the risk assessment must be relooked to ensure that the level of risk for the
training remains within acceptable limits. Use table B-6 as a guideline for self-assessment in
these areas.
Table B-7 IMT/military training, operations and tactical safety

YES NO Remarks
Does the safety office maintain a list of high-risk training?
1 Do safety office personnel review training products for
CRM integration?

1-4h(5).
Documentation: School products (i.e., technical manuals,

field manuals, TSPs, lesson plans, policy, doctrine, etc.).
List of all high-risk training events/risk assessments for all
high-risk training.
46
TRADOC Pam 385-1
IMT/military training, operations and tactical safety

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Are there sufficient instructors/assistant instructors
2 present to conduct training in accordance with the
requirements of the subject TSPs?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-4(a).
Documentation: Copy of TSP and lesson plans.
When the number of instructors and/or assistant

instructors drops below the number specified in the TSP,
3
is the risk assessment updated and approved at the
appropriate level?
Documentation: Updated risk assessment.
Are drill sergeant ratios maintained in accordance with

4
TRADOC standards?
Documentation: Copies of company status report.
Are drill sergeants assigned additional duties that divert

5
them from their primary mission of training Soldiers?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-16, paragraph 2-9a.
Documentation: Copies of additional duty appointment

orders and or duty rosters for drill sergeant.
Is a minimum of one certified combat lifesaver (CLS)

6 drill sergeant or cadre member and one CLS aid bag
present during training per platoon?
Documentation: Drill sergeant/cadre training records,
47
TRADOC Pam 385-1
spot check CLS bags.

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Are CLSs equipped with the appropriate supplies available
7 to provide the necessary first aid and emergency medical
care?
Documentation: Spot check CLS bags.
Does the commander/commandant address medical support

8 requirements in the planning, preparation, and execution of
all training activities?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, Appendix H.
Documentation: Written plan, policy, regulation (the goal

for Medical Support to Training is for injured personnel to
be at an emergency medical support facility within 1 hour).
Has the commander/commandant assessed and certified the

adequacy of their medical support to training at least
9
annually to ensure the capability of ground and air medical
evacuation?
Documentation: CRM worksheet, memorandum.
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-31c;

TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 11-4b(3).
Has the commander/commandant rehearsed their medical

support plan (casualty response, evacuation, and treatment)
10
for high-risk training at least semiannually, with focus on
responding to a training catastrophe?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-31c;

TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 11-4b(3).
Documentation: Copies of exercise after action reports.
48
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Are instructors and cadre qualified in the proper operation
11 and training on the rappel tower, obstacle, confidence,
bayonet, and pugil courses?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-1e.
Documentation: Copy of instructor certification.
Are physical training structures inspected for structural

12
integrity and maintained to standard?
Standard: Training Circular 21-24.
Documentation: Copy of structural inspection and visual

spot check.
Is CRM integrated into all technical and leader

13 development training and operations throughout the
professional military and civilian education programs?
Standard: AR 350-1, table G-2; TRADOC Regulation

Documentation: TSP, lesson plans, training schedules, etc.
Is CRM applied to all training and approved at the

Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, paragraph 3-27;

TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-5.

49
TRADOC Pam 385-1
IMT/military training operations and tactical safety

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Does the risk assessment maintained at the training site
15
reflect current conditions?

TRADOC Regulation 350-70, chapter I-2.
Documentation: Copy of current risk assessment.
16 Is there a lesson plan/TSP at ranges and training areas?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-70.
Documentation: Copy of the lesson plan/TSP.
Is there adequate billeting floor space per trainee (72 net

square feet per Basic Combat Training (BCT)/One Station
Unit Training Soldier (OSUT); 90 net square feet per
17
Advance Individual Training (AIT) Soldier is the desired
goal, unless the Advance Individual Training is located at
an Army Training Center)?

3-36a(4)a-e.
Documentation: Floor plans, visual inspection, etc.
Has commander ensured that military personnel involved

18 in training in or around water are swim tested and non-
swimmers are identified?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 9-2a(1).
Documentation: Swim test results and SOP .
50
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Does safety director provide staff oversight of the water
program to include monitoring appropriate cadre/staff to
19 ensure all instructors involved in teaching or overseeing
training or operations in or around water receive training in
water operations and hazards before teaching students?
Standard: AR 385-10, 13-8; DA Pam 385-10 chapter 12;

TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 9-2 b(1)(2).
Documentation: Regulation, SOPs, audits, training

schedules, and attendance rosters.
Do commanders in the grade of O-6 and above approve

20 deviations from SOP/TSP, and lesson plans for tactical
water operations?
Documentation: SOP, TSP, policy for deviation.
Has commander/commandant established directives

addressing specific safety procedures/requirements for all
21
tactical water training or operations prior to conducting
water operation?
Standard: AR 385-10 paragraphs 13-8, 22-1; TRADOC

Regulation 385-2, paragraph 9-2a(3).
Documentation: Regulation, SOP, and memorandums.
Are the following environmental hazard assessed using

CRM process and appropriate methods taken to minimize
22
risk? High altitude; disease vectors; contaminated food
and water; poor air quality; heat; cold.
Documentation: Regulation, SOP, memorandum, risk

assessment.
51
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Does commander enforce discipline in bivouac areas to
minimize accidents and provide procedures for: Site
selection; camouflage; field sanitation; generators; field
23
mess operations; storage of flammables; fire extinguishers;
grounding of equipment; restriction/control of motor
vehicles?
Documentation: TSP, SOP, regulation, risk assessment

worksheet.
Does commander ensure that all combative training is

conducted by certified instructors of the appropriate level
24
and adhere to the CRM process and instructional
framework?
Standard: AR 350-1, paragraph 1-25d.
Documentation: TSP, lesson plan, SOP, instructors'

certifications.
Is the required protective equipment available, serviceable,

25
and in the appropriate sizes to fit training Soldier?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 350-6, Appendix K-6.
Documentation: Visually inspect protective equipment to

ensure it is available in sizes appropriate to the needs of the
training.
Are only space heaters authorized by the U.S. Army

26
Soldier Systems Center in use?
Documentation: Regulation SOP, memorandum, and

observation.
52
TRADOC Pam 385-1

YES NO Remarks
(continued)
Are traffic and column guards provided with serviceable
27
reflective vests or belts?
Documentation: Observation.
Is vehicle access to running routes controlled during

28
physical training hours?
Documentation: Observation.
Do commanders/commandants have a severe

29 weather/lightning protection plan prepared on hand for
each field training site and/or range?
Documentation: Written plan on hand.
53
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-8. Systems safety

System safety applies engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to
achieve acceptable mishap risk, within the constraints of operational effectiveness, time, and
cost, throughout all phases of the life cycle of systems or facilities. Commanders implement
system safety engineering and management policies consistent with their missions. Apply and
tailor system safety to all Army systems and facilities and integrate system safety into other
manpower and personnel integration concerns. A systems safety checklist is provided at
table B-8.
Table B-8 Systems Safety

YES NO Remarks
Has the commander implemented a system safety
1 engineering and management policy consistent with the
proponent mission?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 9-2; DA Pam 385-16

paragraphs 1-4, 5-1, 5-3 and 5-4; TRADOC Regulation
Documentation: Copy of system safety engineering and

management policy and knowledge of policy at directorate
and unit level.
Does the system safety engineer on the table of distribution

2. and allowances meet the OPM standards for safety
engineer GS-0803 series?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 3-2a(2),

table 3-1.
Documentation: Review systems safety engineer job

description.
Is systems safety represented in all phases of combat

3
developments?

paragraph 1-4a; TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph
4-2b.
Documentation: Material requirement documents.

Evidence of coordination with proponent Directorate of
Combat Development.
54
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Systems Safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does safety office ensure safety of use message, ground
precautionary messages, safety of flight, and aviation
4
safety action messages to include safety releases,
confirmations, and assessments are disseminated?
Standard: DA Pam 385-16.
Documentation: Copies of message are at unit level,

combat developers, and/or proponent school for action.
Does the safety office have a process to ensure a safety

release is disseminated to the user prior to pretest troop
5 training for local tests, experiments, appraisals, and
demonstrations involving troops and Soldier support
equipment?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 4-3d(2).
Documentation: Copy of safety release, SOP, written

procedures, and policies.
Are processes established to review and ensure that all

residual hazards controlled by procedures or training are
6
addressed in the training products and associated
publications for those systems?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4p(3), 9-2a, 9-2j; DA

Pam 385-16.
Documentation: Residual hazards addressed in program of

instructions, lesson plans, and field manuals. Review or
validation on hand.
Does school/proponent/system safety review all

modifications of mission profiles and capability documents
7
for safety impact and are the results reported to the combat
developer?
55
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Policy on review of mission profile

modifications and capability documents.
Systems safety (continued) YES NO Remarks
Upon discovering an unsafe condition with a piece of
Army equipment does the unit/school/branch, notify the
8
proponent command of the system and the TRADOC
Safety Systems Engineer?
Documentation: Copy of notification to proponent.

Systems engineer or representative has documentation.
Does unit/school/proponent identify, through the accident

reporting system, inadequacies contributing to an accident
9
and analyze these inadequacies to ensure that safety
compromising trends are identified?
Documentation: Accident report equipment analysis,

Safety of Use Message, Ground Precautionary Messages,
etc.
Does the commander/commandant ensure that equipment

safety risks are accepted at a level of management
10
authority commensurate with the risk in accordance with
AR 70-1 and DA Pam 385-30?
Standard: AR 70-1, paragraph 1-5; AR 385-10, paragraph

9-2(i); DA Pam 385-30, paragraph 4-11g; TRADOC
Documentation: System Safety Risk Assessment for all

risks exceeding the criteria for “low” risk.
Are preliminary hazard lists developed to identify specific

11 hazards during the concept phase for development of
systems?
56
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Copy of preliminary hazard lists for new

systems under development.
57
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Systems safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Do safety office personnel participate in Systems Safety
12
Working Groups, if applicable?

DA Pam 385-16.
Documentation: Written or electronic lists of reported

systems hazards and attendance of systems safety working
group.
58
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-9. Range, explosive, and ammunition safety

The degree of success of the ammunition surveillance and explosives safety programs depends
upon management visibility, organizational structure, and quality assurance specialist,
ammunition surveillance (QASAS) personnel staffing to mitigate a hazardous situation. The
ultimate goal is to ensure ammunition and explosives are safe and serviceable for storage,
transportation, and use by Soldiers.
a. Commanders should ensure that the QASAS/explosives safety functions are staffed with
sufficient qualified personnel to support the mission and to provide for daily ammunition
surveillance and explosives safety operations as required by Army standards.
b. Commanders should ensure that QASAS personnel and safety specialists are provided
required refresher training to keep up to date with the latest weapon and ammunition technology.
c. An effective range safety program will:
(1) Enhance safe, realistic, live-fire training.
(2) Prevents fratricide in live-fire training.
(3) Protect civilian and military populations who live and work in the vicinity of live-fire
training ranges.
(4) Protect the environment from the effects of live-fire training.
d. Commanders will develop range safety regulations and/or SOPs, integrating appropriate
CRM processes and procedures.
e. Qualified safety specialists should inspect all explosives and training complexes on a
semiannual basis. High-risk training operations should be inspected more often as the risk
dictates.
f. Report and investigate all incidents or accidents involving Arms, Ammunition and
Explosives with firing units.
g. Commander should use the self-assessment checklist in table B-9 to ensure their program
meets all applicable guidance.
59
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table B-9 Range, explosive, and ammunition safety

YES NO Remarks
Has the commander/commandant established a Range
1
Safety Program?
Standard: AR 385-63, paragraph 1-4p.
Documentation: Range safety program documents.
Has the commander/commandant established an Explosive

2
Safety Management Program?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 5-1 and DA Pam 385-64,

paragraph 1-5b.
Documentation: Explosive safety program documents.
Has the commander/commandant established a

Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or policy that outlines
3
the Explosive Safety Management Program requirements
and responsibilities of both garrison and mission?

paragraph 1-5c(1).
Documentation: Explosive safety program policy and MOA

documents.
Has the commander/commandant ensured the

4 explosive/range safety staff is appropriate for the unit’s
mission and are they properly trained and qualified?

paragraphs 1-5b, 1-5c.
Documentation: Unit Table of Distribution and Allowance

and Assignment rosters, Training Records.
Has the commander forwarded a copy of range deviations,

5 Certificates of Risk Acceptance, and Certificates of
Compelling Reason to HQ TRADOC Safety?
60
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Range deviation log.
Range, explosive, and ammunition safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Are range deviations, Certificates of Risk Acceptance,
6 and Certificate of Compelling Reasons current, complete,
and approved at the appropriate level?

paragraph 1-5; DA Pam 385-64, paragraph 1-13,
TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 6-3a.
Documentation: Copy of all range deviations,

Certificates of Risk Acceptance and Certificate of
Compelling Reasons.
Does the safety office review all new TRADOC

range/explosive facilities construction and are they
7 coordinated thru garrison safety for site planning and to
ensure that the installation master plan is annotated with
Explosive Safety Management Program requirements?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 5-5, DA Pam 386-64,

paragraphs 1-6b(8), (12), (14), and 1-11, TRADOC
Regulation 385-2, paragraph 6-2b(8),(9).
Documentation: Range safety SOP, copy of range

waivers, and proof of safety office review of new
range/explosive facilities construction.
Are properly approved explosive safety site plans

8
available and up-to-date for storage facilities?
Standard: DA Pam 385-64, chapter 4.
Documentation: Validate installation explosive safety site

plans for accuracy.
Is a process in place that ensures that the CRM process is

9 applied to all training/operations prior to occupying range
complex or explosive facilities?
Standard: AR 385-63, paragraph 2-7, AR 385-10,

paragraph 5-3.
61
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Standard, SOP, or risk assessment.

Are commanders complying with installation special use
10
airspace requirements for live-fire training?
Standard: AR 385-63.
Documentation: Range regulations/SOP.
Are new baffled firing ranges approved by the

11
appropriate command?
Documentation: Approval letter.
Does the commander/commandant have a process for

12
approving “burst offset” firing techniques?
Standard: DA Pam 385-63, paragraph 5-2b.
Documentation: Approval process for “burst offset”

firing techniques.
Has commander/commandant established procedures for

13 the approval of nonstandard ammunition before
purchase?
Documentation: Nonstandard ammunition approval

process.
Are ammunition and explosives stored in licensed

14
locations and quantity/distance limits maintained?

chapter 5.
Documentation: Review installation Standard Army

Ammunition System-Modification explosives safety
62
TRADOC Pam 385-1
report.

15 Are ammunition and explosives storage facilities inspected
annually?

paragraph 1-9.
Documentation: Review inspection reports by QASAS and

safety for findings and recommendations.
16 Were lightning protection system and bonding for explosive

facilities visually inspected and electrically tested IAW DA
Pam 385-64, appendix D?
Standard: DA Pam 385-64, paragraphs 17-27, 17-28, and

17-29.
Documentation: Review lightning protection system

inspection records and electrical test results.
17 Are the correct storage fire/chemical symbols displayed?
Standard: DA Pam 385-64, paragraphs 6-14 and 6-16.
Documentation: Visually check storage sites/facilities to

verify correct signage.
18 Are SOPs developed, current, and used for all arms,

ammunition and explosives operations?
Documentation: Review of SOP to ensure workers have

information necessary to perform their task safely and that
required procedures are identified.
19 Have personnel working with or transporting arms,

ammunitions and explosives received required training?
Standard: AR 385-10, chapter 10-10b; DA Pam 385-64,

paragraph 1-8, and 20-2.
63
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Review training rosters.

B-10. Radiation safety
a. The TRADOC Radiation Protection Program safeguards personnel from unnecessary

exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation through:
(1) Control of radiation sources.
(2) Personnel training.
(3) Surveys and monitoring.
(4) Documentation of radiation emissions.
(5) Medical examinations and bioassays.
b. Commanders should ensure there is positive control of potential health hazards resulting
from the procurement, possession, storage, transportation, use, and disposal of radioactive
materials or equipment capable of producing potentially hazardous ionizing or non-ionizing
radiation. The checklist at table B-10 is provided to assist in this effort.
Table B-10 Radiation safety

YES NO Remarks
Does the commander/commandant have a radiation safety
1
program?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(9), 7-2a.
Documentation: Radiation safety SOP.
Does the commander/commandant designate, in writing, a

2
radiation staff safety officer?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(5).
Documentation: Radiation staff safety officer appointment

memorandum.
64
TRADOC Pam 385-1
65
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Radiation Safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Has the commander forwarded a copy of radiation
3
deviations to HQ TRADOC?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(9); DA Pam

385-24, paragraph 1-4i(5)(b).
Documentation: Central registration of deviations.
Has the commander/commandant established written

policies and procedures for radioactive commodities as
4
necessary to ensure compliance with radiation safety
requirements in applicable technical publications?
Documentation: Radioactive commodities policy and

procedures.
Does the commander/commandant ensure compliance

with conditions of Army Materiel Command (AMC)-
held radioactive commodity Nuclear Regulatory
5 Commission (NRC) licenses and Army Radiation
Authorizations (ARA) to include ensuring all personnel
using radioactive material are aware of applicable
regulations and conditions as appropriate?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 7-2b.
Documentation: SOPs for AMC-held radioactive

commodities.
Does the command have approved applications for new,

6
renewals, or amendments to ARA?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 7-6, DA Pam 385-24

paragraphs 1-4i(1) and 1-4i(3).
Documentation: Copy of ARAs/amendments.
66
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Radiation safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Does the commander/commandant ensure that all the NRC
licenses, ARAs, and Army Radiation Permits for
7
radioactive materials and machine produced ionizing
radiation equipment are available?
Documentation: Copy of license, authorizations, permits.
Is the commander/commandant in compliance with

8
appropriate NRC licenses and ARA requirements?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs 7-2b, 7-6b; DA Pam

385-24, paragraphs 1-4j(6), 1-4i(1).
Documentation: Copy of current NRC/ARA license.
Has the commander/commandant established written

policies and procedures to assure compliance with
9
applicable Federal, DOD, and Army radiation safety
regulations and directives?
Documentation: Policies and procedures for radiation

safety (emergency reaction plans as necessary and
procedures for investigating and reporting radiation
accidents, incidents, and overexposures).
67
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Does the commander/commandant assure that an internal
(for example, the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) or local
10 acting Inspector General) or external agent (for example,
the Surgeon General or an RSO from another command) or
agency audits the radiation safety program annually?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraphs 1-4j(6), 1-4i(5)(d);

1-4k(2)(c).
Documentation: Audit report.
Has the commander/commandant established an

installation Radiation Safety Committee? (as per NRC
11 license requirements or as need dictates, the Radiation
Safety Committee provide information on issues to
command and are audited by command)
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 2-23c(1).
Documentation: Installation Radiation Safety Committee

meeting minutes.
Does the commander/commandant maintain an inventory

of radiation sources as higher headquarters directs and in
12 accordance with requirements of NRC licenses, Army
reactor permits, Army radiation authority, and technical
publications?
Documentation: Inventory of radiation sources.
68
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Has the commander/commandant established and
employed procedures to assure that captured, purchased,
borrowed, or otherwise obtained foreign equipment and
13
materiel are surveyed for radioactive material and that
appropriate actions are taken following discovery of any
radioactive material in those items?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs 1-4m, 7-5i.
Documentation: SOP for foreign equipment and materials.
Has the commander/commandant established and

employed procedures to ensure that there is a Light
14 Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation
(LASER) Safety Program established and a designated
LASER Safety Officer in writing?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraphs 1-4k(1), 1-4k(2).
Documentation: LASER Safety Policy.
Does the commander/commandant maintain an inventory

15 of Class 3b and Class 4 LASER as higher headquarters
directs and in accordance with requirements?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraph 3-1h.
Documentation: Policies and procedures for non-ionizing

radiation safety.
Does the commander/commandant ensure LASER

accidents are reported to the Tri-service hotline and the
16
United States Army Public Health Command (Provisional)
and follow accident reporting procedures?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraph 5-3a; DA Pam

385-40, paragraph 5-4c(2)(b).
Documentation: Policies and procedures for non-ionizing

radiation safety.
69
TRADOC Pam 385-1

17 Does the commander/commandant report excess “military-
exempt” LASERs to the Defense Reutilization and
Marketing Service for utilization screening within DOD?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraph 1-4i(6).
Documentation: Excess military-exempt LASER SOP.
18 Has the commander/commandant established and

employed procedures to ensure that there is a
Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) Safety Program
established and have designated a RFR Safety Officer in
writing?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraphs 1-4k(1) and

1-4k(2).
Documentation: RFR safety policy and procedures.
19 Does the commander/commandant ensure RFR accidents

are reported to United States Army Public Health
Command (Provisional) and follow accident reporting
procedures?
Standard: DA Pam 385-24, paragraph 6-1a(3)(b); DA Pam

385-40, paragraph 5-4c(2)(a).
Documentation: RFR safety policy and procedures.
20 Are radiation handlers/users trained in safe working

conditions and operating procedures in accordance with
applicable regulations and directives?
Documentation: Lesson plans, training roster, and

schedule of classes.
70
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Radiation safety (continued) YES No Remarks

21 Do radiation safety officers receive required radiation
protection training? Has training been completed before
RSO/LASER Safety Officer/RFR Safety Officer assumes
the Radiation Safety Program responsibilities? Is refresher
training occurring annually/and retraining after significant
regulatory change or every 5 years?

paragraph 1.
Documentation: Certificate of completion of refresher

training; lesson plans/program of instructions/TSPs and
schedule of classes.
71
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-11. Aviation safety
a. Aviation operations are an important part of TRADOC operations. Aviation safety is a

major subprogram of the Army Safety and Occupational Health Program and provides increased
combat power and efficiencies for the commander. Aviation is an inherently dangerous business
with many facets of mission risk. This makes safety at all levels of utmost importance. Aviation
Safety Program requirements apply to all Army operations and personnel participating in
aviation activities and to all who operate and/or maintain Army aircraft (manned or unmanned).
TRADOC organizations conducting/supporting aviation operations will have an active and
effective aviation safety program with fully engaged leadership.
b. Table B-11 applies to all TRADOC aviation units (both manned and unmanned) and
TRADOC units with aviation assets assigned.
Table B-11 Aviation safety

YES NO Remarks
Is there a school trained aviation safety officer (ASO)
assigned to the TDA, Table of Organization and
1
Equipment, Modified Table of Organization and
Equipment; authorized full-time position?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j(2).
Documentation: Copy of TDA.
Is there a safety-trained NCO or qualified individual

2 appointed by the unit commander, in writing, to assist the
safety manager in aviation units?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j (3)(d).
Documentation: A certificate of completion from a

sanctioned Safety Course and appointment orders for the
safety NCO or alternate to the ASO.
72
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Aviation safety (continued) YES NO Remarks

Has an appropriately trained additional duty aviation safety
officer been appointed in aviation organizations without
3 authorized ASO positions, and in non-aviation organizations,
not staffed with full-time safety personnel to perform safety
and accident prevention functions for the commander?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j(3)(c);

AR 385-10, paragraph 2-6d/2-7g; DA Pam 385-10,
paragraph 3-3f.
Documentation: Check appointment orders and ADSO

course completion certificate (within 90 days of
appointment).
At brigade level and below, does the ASO work directly for
4
and is rated by the commander?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j (3); AR 385-10,

paragraph 2-7g.
Documentation: Unit rating scheme.
Has the commander established a written safety philosophy

5 that incorporates goals, objectives, and priorities? Is it in the
quarterly training guidance?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-3; DA Pam 385-90,

paragraph 1-4j(5); AR 385-10, paragraph 15-2a(2).
Documentation: Check the commander’s safety philosophy

for completeness.
Does the ASO maintain current unit safety functional files

6 and are procedures for safety files and administration
established in the SOP?
Standard: AR 25-400-2, paragraph 1-7,

https://www.arims.army.mil/; AR 385-10, paragraph 16-2,
DA Pam 385-90 paragraph 2-10f.
73
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Documentation: Functional files and SOP.

Does the safety manager maintain a current library of safety
7 regulations, accident prevention directives, and instructional
materials?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4m(6)(h) and

Appendix A.
Documentation: Check access to current regulations in

printed or electronic format. Recommending printed copies
of the minimum daily core regulations (385 series).
Does the ASO maintain safety bulletin boards with:
(1) The names of the Commander, ASO, and Aviation Safety

NCO
(2) The names of command support and safety-related
program managers
8
(3) The most recent Commander’s Safety Council and
Executive Safety Council, as applicable);
(4) The unit and next higher Commanders’ Safety
Philosophies;
(5) Blank DA Forms 2696, Operational Hazard Report
(OHR); (6) Blank DA Forms 4755s?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraphs 1-4m(5), 2-4f.
Documentation: Check all safety bulletin boards with

current minutes posted.
Has the safety manager established written procedures for

9 the awards program, to include procedures for impact
awards?

paragraph 1-4 (m)(6)(q); DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 1-6.
Documentation: Verify all applicable safety awards

programs are functioning. Policy and evidence of issue
during the evaluation period (unit, individual, impact,
flight, and safe drivers). Ensure the program is funded
down to the unit level. Review the SOP to find if this area
is covered. If this area is not recognized, ask the ASO.
74
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Does the safety manager maintain historical
10 documentation of awards presented to the unit and
individuals?
Standard: AR 25-400-2, paragraph 1-7 and record

number 385-10gg2.
Documentation: Check for historical records of awards

being presented to the unit and individuals and maintained
on file for 2 years.
Does the command have a crew endurance program

11 included in the standard operating procedures? Is the
crew endurance policy being adhered to?
Standard: AR 25-400-2, paragraph 1-7a, b,

https://www.arims.army.mil/; DA Pam 385-90 paragraph
2-10f.
Documentation: SOP or policy letters and risk assessment

worksheets.
Does the ASO ensure CRM worksheets are completed and

12
reviewed for all training/operations?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph1-5d(4).
Documentation: Spot check current operations and

inspect historical records.
Does the commander clearly specify in writing, safety

13 duties for staff officers, subordinate commanders, leaders,
and individuals?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j(13);

AR 385-10, paragraph 1-5.
Documentation: SOP or policy letters.
75
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are command-approved risk-control options integrated
14 into the SOP as task performance standards and are all
appropriate subjects addressed in the unit SOP?
Documentation: Review the SOP for inclusion of all

applicable subjects and risk control options.
Are procedures established to ensure the unit receives

applicable aviation/non-aviation safety messages for
15
assigned aircraft, ground vehicles, air vehicles, related
systems, components, or repair parts?
Standard: AR 750-6, paragraphs 2-3 through 2-7.
Documentation: Check for written procedures

establishing responsibility for obtaining safety action
messages assigned aircraft, air vehicles, related systems,
components, or repair parts. If nothing is found, ask the
ASO about current procedures.
Does the ASO rehearse, review, and document the

16
adequacy of the unit pre-accident plan?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4m(6)(e).
Documentation: Review the unit/airfield SOP, pre-

accident plan, record of plan preparation, as well as the
rehearsal and review records kept on file.
Does the pre-accident plan specify procedures to be

17
followed in the event of aviation and ground accidents?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-9b(4);

FM 3-04.300, paragraph 11-15 and Appendix E-11/ E-12.
Documentation: Review the pre-accident plan for

procedures to be followed in the event of an accident.
76
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are the responsibilities of aviators involved in accidents
18
established in the SOP?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-12p.
Documentation: Review the SOP to find if this area is

covered. If this area is not covered, ask the ASO about
current procedures established in the organization.
Are procedures established to integrate risk management

19 into all unit aviation and ground mission planning and
execution activities?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 15-1b.

covered. If this area is not recognized ask the ASO about
Are radiological protection programs established in

20 writing when the commander has determined that a
radiological hazard or LASER exist in the unit?

covered. IF THE COMMANDER RECOGNIZES THE
NEED FOR SUCH A PROGRAM ask the ASO about
Has the organization established procedures for handling

21
ammunition, explosives, and/or weapons?
Documentation: IF THE UNIT PERFORMS THIS

FUNCTION, review the SOP to find if this area is
covered. If this area is not recognized, ask the ASO about
current.
77
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is command level authority of risk acceptance specified in
22
the SOP?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j (6)c.
Documentation: Check SOP for risk acceptance level.
Are command safety council meeting conducted quarterly

23
and the minutes maintained on file for 2 years?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4j(14) and 2-4f;

AR 25-400-2, Army Records Information Management
System (ARIMS), https://www.arims.army.mil Record
number 385-10d.
Documentation: Check records for council minutes.
Are Abbreviated Accident Reports submitted for all

24
applicable aviation and ground mishaps?
Documentation: Review all submitted reports using

Record Management Information System and spot check
suspense dates with USACR/SC.
Are file copies maintained of Army Aviation Accident

25 Reports (AAAR) and Army Ground Accident Reports
(AGAR) submitted by the organization?
Standard: AR 25-400-2, paragraph 1-7.
Documentation: Verify file copies are maintained by the

army standards.
Does the ASO review aircraft accident reports and

26 operational hazard report (OHR) to help implement
corrections?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraphs 1-4m(6)(d); 2-7c.
Documentation: Review the accidents and hazard logs to
78
TRADOC Pam 385-1
verify the ASO’s actions.

Is follow-up action documented on operational hazard
27 reports to include the responsible commander’s signature
and are completed reports maintained on file for 2 years?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraphs 2-7b(f), 2-7c(6).
Documentation: Check submitted OHRs. Ensure the

suspense's have been met and the commander has signed
the completed OHR within 10 working days; files are
maintained for 2 years.
Are required aviation accident prevention survey

28 procedures covered in the SOP and all functional areas
inspected annually?

paragraphs 1-4j and 2-11.
Documentation: Check for documentation of annual

accident prevention surveys. All applicable functional
areas must be surveyed and hazards tracked for the unit to
receive credit for a complete survey.
Are copies of previous safety surveys maintained on file

29
for 5 years?
Standard: AR 25-400-2, paragraph 1-7;

www.arims.army.mil; and 385-10i.
Documentation: Review files in the organization

indicating the completion of the surveys (5 years worth
for all organizations).
79
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are functional or sub areas surveyed within 60 days of a
30
new program manager being appointed?
Documentation: Review the survey files and compare

them to appointment orders. (5 years worth for all
organizations).
Does the foreign object damage officer/

31 NCO delegate specific areas and ensure monthly
inspections of all unit areas?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-8d(2).
Documentation: Check the unit’s foreign object damage

area delegation and survey records.
Are fire risk management surveys reviewed for

32 hazardous conditions to be included in the organizations
hazard tracking system?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 4-3j; DA Pam

Documentation: Check Fire Risk Management surveys

(AR 420-1, paragraph 25-27) are completed IAW Fire
Chief’s program, copies maintained by unit, and
appropriate hazards added to the hazard log.
Does the ASO monitor unit aviation maintenance

33 programs and address uncorrected hazards on the hazard
tracking system?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph 4-3j; DA Pam

Documentation: Check to see if the ASO reviews shop

inspections/ other reports and puts uncorrected hazards
on the hazard log.
80
TRADOC Pam 385-1

34 Does the safety manager monitor the Aviation Life
Support Equipment program to ensure all deficiencies that
are not corrected by Aviation Life Support Equipment
personnel are tracked on the unit’s hazard tracking
system?
Documentation: Check surveys and council minutes for

Aviation Life Support Equipment evaluations.
35 Does the ASO review accident/incident reports and

investigations, equipment improvement reports (EIRs),
product quality deficiency reports (PQDRs), and safety
action messages for uncorrected hazards to be included on
the units’ hazard tracking system?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 1-4m(6)(d).
Documentation: Review Army Aviation Accident

Reports, Army Ground Accident Reports, DA Form 285s,
DA Form 4755s, OHRs, product quality deficiency
reports, equipment improvement reports, and all other
sources that may be good sources of unreported hazards.
36 Has the organization implemented a file or log of hazards

and maintained them for 5 years or until no longer
needed?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph D-4(g); DA Pam

385-90, paragraph 2-10(f); AR 25-400-2;
www.arims.army.mil.
Documentation: Check organization’s files for a hazard

tracking system that meets requirements.
37 Is the hazard identification, analysis, and countermeasures

implementation and control program requirements
established within the unit SOP?
81
TRADOC Pam 385-1
covered. If this area is not recognized inquire of the ASO.

Are all uncorrected hazards detected during accident
prevention surveys entered on the hazard tracking
38 system, DA Form 4754 or equivalent? Is a hazard
abatement plan completed for RAC 1 & 2 hazards when
corrective action exceeds 30 days?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, appendix D, D-4(g); DA

Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-10(f) TRADOC Regulation
Documentation: Check hazards to determine if the

uncorrected hazards were entered into the hazard log
and an abatement plan was completed on RAC 1 & 2
hazards when correction exceeds 30 days.
Are current hazards (including Aviation Accident

Prevention Survey findings) reviewed at the Command
39
Safety Council and are follow-up actions taken to
correct noted deficiencies?
Standard: DA Pam 385-10, paragraph D-4(g); DA Pam

385-90, paragraphs 2-4a and 2-10(f).
Documentation: Check the hazard log and ensure most

deficiencies are being logged. Check the suspense
system to ensure it is current. Validate review with
council minutes.
Are minutes of the Command Safety Council meetings

40 published with action officers and suspense dates
assigned to action items?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-4f.
Documentation: Review the council minutes noting the

assignment of action, action officers and suspense dates
for open items.
82
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are the Command/Enlisted Safety Councils established
41 with appropriate membership and do they meet at least
quarterly?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraphs 1-4j(13) and

2-4b.
Documentation: Review the orders or SOP and check

minutes.
Are safety council meeting minutes signed by the

commander and distributed, to include posting to the
42
safety bulletin board and forwarding to the next higher
headquarters?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-4f.
Documentation: Check the distribution list on the

minutes or cover memo, e-mail forwarding, and the
signature block.
Does the safety manager organize the Command Safety

43
Council?
Standard: DA Pam 385-90, paragraph 2-4c.
Documentation: Review the council orders and or

council minutes to ensure that the ASO is functioning as
the council’s recorder.
83
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are the procedures for the safety councils established in
44
the SOP?

covered. If this area is not recognized, ask the ASO.
Has the commander established a safety education and

training program in writing that ensures safety training is
45
conducted monthly for full-time organizations and
quarterly for all others?

paragraphs 2-4g and 2-12.
Documentation: AR 385-10, paragraph 15-5; DA Pam

385-90, paragraph 2-4g.
84
TRADOC Pam 385-1
B-12. Motor vehicle accident prevention
a. Most motor vehicle accidents are caused by driver error. Proper selection, training, and
supervision can reduce the incidence of these errors. Commanders are ultimately responsible for
the implementation of effective motor accident prevention efforts within their commands and
should ensure the individuals they select as drivers are well trained, motivated, and supervised.
This includes responsibility for operation of POVs by members of their commands. See
table B-12 for a motor vehicle accident prevention safety checklist.
b. Commanders should:
(1) Comply with requirements of 23 CFR 1230, DODI 6055.04, AR 385-10, and
AR 600-55.
(2) Develop and prescribe local procedures for the safe operation of motor vehicles.
(3) Develop and execute training, education, and motivation programs for motor vehicle
operation.
(4) Ensure motor vehicle activities and accident data are collected and analyzed.
Table B-12 Motor vehicle accident prevention

YES NO Remarks
Does commander/commandant administer a Motor
1
Vehicle Accident Prevention program?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 11-2(a)(3).
Documentation: Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention

document (i.e., safety regulation, standard memo, etc…).
Does the commander/commandant ensure supervisors are

enforcing standards of performance for vehicle operations
2
of Army motor vehicle operations and periodically
assessing driver performance?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraphs1-5b and 11-2b.
Documentation: Inspection report, training records, and

SOPs.
85
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Motor vehicle accident prevention (continued) YES NO Remarks

Are civilian employees that operate Army motor vehicle
3 receiving online Army Accident Avoidance Training
Course?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 11-7(a)(5).
Documentation: Certificates of completion.
Have commanders established procedures for the safe

4 operation of motor vehicles on and off Army installations
and contractor vehicles on post?
Standard: AR 385-10 paragraph 11-3a(1)(2).

document, SOP, and regulation.
Do commanders ensure that motorcycle and moped

5 operators are required to comply with established Army
motorcycle safety requirements?
Documentation: Motor vehicle accident prevention

program, appropriate license and personal protective
equipment.
Has the commander/commandant established a

6
Motorcycle Mentorship Program?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 1-4e(7).

document.
86
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Is the Army Traffic Safety Training Program fully
implemented (Introductory (Advance Individual Training
7 Students complete one hour DVD), Local Area Hazards,
Intermediate, Accident Avoidance, and Remedial Driver
Training)?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 11-7a.(1)(2)(3)(5) and b.
Documentation: Attendance roster and lesson plans.
Does the commander convene a POV task force at least

8
semiannually?
Documentation: Minutes from POV task force.
Are motorcycle operators prior to operation of any

motorcycle completing a Motorcycle Safety Foundation or
9
Motorcycle Safety Foundation based approved motorcycle
rider safety course?
Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 11-9b(1).
Documentation: Certificate of completion, lesson plans,

and attendance roster.
Do all operators of government or privately owned all

10 terrain vehicles on DOD installations meet established
training requirements?
Standard: DoDI 6055.4, paragraph E3.2.3.3; AR 385-10,

paragraph 11-9b(6); TRADOC Regulation 385-2,
paragraph 8-5.

completion, and lesson plans.
87
TRADOC Pam 385-1

Are all TRADOC military members prohibited from using
11
cell phones unless hands free regardless of location?

Regulation, SOP, and policy.
12 Has the command implemented a straggler control policy?
Documentation: Regulation, SOP, and policy.
Do all DOD vehicles, including government-owned and

13 contractor-operated vehicles required to pass an annual
safety inspection?
Standard: AR 385-10 paragraph 11-3c.
Documentation: Safety inspections.
Do soldiers complete a TRiPs (POV risk assessment)

14 when going on leave, pass or TDY out of the immediate
local area and will be operating a motor vehicle?
Standard: AR 385-10 paragraph 11.4a(8).
Documentation: Actual TRiPS reports.
Does command have the appropriate traffic safety

15
clothing for traffic guards and Soldiers?
Standard: TRADOC Regulation 385-2, paragraph 8-9,

table 8-1.
Documentation: Regulation, SOP, and policy.
88
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table B-13 Identification of Radiation, Inert Munitions and Ammunition Components,

Museums/Displays:
1. General: War trophies, museum display items, training aids, and the use of inert ammunition
and components for public demonstrations, or office display may represent a significant hazard if
these items are not free of all explosive material or chemical fillers.
2. Policy:
a. Ammunition and explosive items will not be rendered inert except by technically qualified
personnel IAW established procedures.
b. Ammunition and ammunition components will be identified and certified as inert IAW DA
Pam 385-64.
c. Items on museum display must be certified as inert and that certification annotated on the
DA Form 2609, Historical Property Catalog, or its electronic equivalent, for that item.
Identification of Radiation, Inert Munitions and YES NO Remarks

Ammunition Components, Museums/Displays
1 Is each item of ammunition or component that is part of a
permanent museum display inspected by explosive
ordnance disposal personnel or other personnel familiar
with explosives?
Standard: DA Pam 385-64, Para 3-5d
Documentation: DA Form 2609 or its electronic

equivalent, for item annotated as inert.
2 Does the DA From 2609 or its electronic equivalent

record the date of inspection and inspecting unit?

equivalent, for item annotated
89
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Identification of Radiation, Inert Munitions and YES NO Remarks

Ammunition Components, Museums/Displays
3 Has the museum curator annotated in the remarks section
of the DA Form 2609 that the item was found to be or
made inert?

equivalent, for item annotated
4 Has the museum established a Hazard Communication

Program?
Standard: AR 870-20 paragraph 1-15c
Documentation: Copy of written Hazard Communication

Program.
5 Are museum employees trained IAW 29CFR1200?
Standard: AR 870-20,, paragraph 1-16c(6)
Documentation: Documented training for employees.
6 Are items in the museum's collection containing

radioactive material licensed with the NRC or controlled
with an internal Army permit?
Standard: AR 870-20, paragraph 1-16d
Documentation: Copy of NRC License or Army

Radiation Authorization.
7 Have radiological surveys of artifacts containing radiation

or areas in which they are stored conducted per the
conditions of the license or permit?
Standard: AR 870-20, paragraph 1-16d
Documentation: Copy of radiological survey.
90
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Appendix C
Conditioning/Obstacle Course Criteria
C-1. Conditioning/obstacle course criteria

Conditioning/endurance course inspection and standardization criteria (see figures C-1
through C-31 and tables C-1 through C-26).
IMT Conditioning/Endurance Course Evaluator Information Checklist

Course: _____________________________________________________________________
Location: ____________________________________ Date of Inspection: ______________
Inspector:
Name: _______________________________Organization: ________________________
POC Name: ___________________________Organization: ________________________
Phone: ____________________________________________________________________
1. Courses will be evaluated to identify any safety hazards/concerns. Deficiencies found during
the inspection will be annotated and corrective actions initiated by the responsible organization.
2. This evaluation will also assist in standardizing courses used at TRADOC activities.
3. Obstacle Category: Conditioning and Endurance.
Note: Surface refers to the area beneath and around obstacles to include travel lanes and at least
six feet to the sides of obstacles presenting a fall hazard. Impact absorbing material depth under
obstacles is 18 inches for sand, 12 inches of shredded rubber, and 24 inches for saw dust. Sand
and sawdust must be tilled or turned at least annually to combat settling and ensure impact
absorbance.
4. Standards for conditioning/endurance courses are a combination of those found in Engineer

Drawing DEF 028-13-95, Obstacle Course Layout Plan; TC 3-22.20, Army Physical Readiness
Training; and TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
Figure C-1. IMT conditioning/endurance course evaluator information checklist
91
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-1
General administrative inspection criteria checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD NO
GO
1. Training a. Training event is supported by TSP, program of instruction, or
requirement lesson plan.
b. SOPs are published and on hand at each course.
2. Administrative Condition service logs are maintained on all ropes used for
surmounting and suspension.
3. Risk management a. Generic risk assessment worksheet maintained onsite.
b. Daily risk assessment worksheet is onsite during training
identifying hazards associated with personnel, equipment, and
environment.
4. Inspections a. Copy of last safety inspection report conducted by professional
safety staff onsite.
b. Copy of daily pre-operations inspection maintained at site.
c. Existing deficiencies are documented and maintained by the
responsible organization.
d. Copy of current work orders maintained by responsible
organization.
5. Accident trends A list of all injuries sustained on obstacles is maintained by responsible
organization and safety office.
Remarks:
Table C-2
General inspection criteria checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1. Wood a. There are no signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact damage.
timbers b. No protruding nails or splinters that may cause injury when obstacle is
negotiated.
c. All timbers are connected securely together to prevent movement when put
under stress.
2. Wall a. All boards are securely attached to structure with proper hardware (bolts and
boards nuts).
b. All boards free of protruding nails, splinters, rot, or damage.
c. Edges of boards rounded/smooth where used to support individual’s weight.
3. Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers in place and of the designated type, size, and
placement.
b. All anchors are made of three or more galvanized guy wire.
c. Take-up galvanized turnbuckles are used at anchor points of each cable to
allow adjustment.
d. All cable clamps are positioned with U-bolt placed on the dead or short end
of cable.
4. Fiber ropes a. All ropes are free of rips, tears, cuts, frays, rot, or unraveled sections.
b. All ropes designed for surmounting are 1.5 inches in diameter.
c. Ropes are securely mounted to supporting timbers with ends tied and taped.
d. Ends of ropes are tied in a knot or wrapped to prevent fraying.
e. Condition/service logs are maintained on all ropes used for surmounting and
suspension.
5. Design Professional safety staff reviews obstacle construction plans.
92
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Remarks:
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
6. Fall a. The surface under conditioning obstacles will be free of any tripping hazard
protection and covered with sand or saw dust.
b. Any obstacle requiring negotiation at an elevated level (in excess of 6 feet)
will have impact absorbing material beneath it and around it at least 5 feet
from the edges.
c. Forged steel hooks are used to fasten nets to its supports.
d. Nets are weight tested after initial installation and before being used as a
fall protection system, whenever relocated, after major repair and every 6
months. The drop-test shall consist of a 400 pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 or
- 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped into the net from the highest
walking/working surface at which employees are exposed to fall hazards, but
not from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the commander
can demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test required by 29
CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated competent person)
shall certify that the net and net installation is in compliance with 29 CFR
1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification record prior to the net being used
as a fall protection system. The certification record must include an
identification of the net and net installation for which the certification record is
being prepared; the date that it was determined that the identified net and net
installation were in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature
of the person making the determination and certification. The most recent
certification record for each net and net installation shall be available at the
training site for inspection.
e. All nets are suspended below high obstacles (in excess of 10 feet) have
padding or small mesh material to prevent limbs from penetrating net
f. All padding is in good condition with no tears, holes, or loose material to
trip personnel when dismounting.
g. All pole-vaulting pads are placed properly at base of designated high
obstacles.
7. Padding a. All safety padding attached to timbers is in good condition without signs of
damage.
b. All pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement
when impacted.
8. Base a. Base containment box is adequate to contain all absorbent material located
containmen at base of obstacle.
t box b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
c. Containment box extends far enough from dismount point of obstacle to
prevent creating a tripping hazard.
d. Containment box is filled with either 18 inches of sand, 12 inches of
shredded rubber, or 24 inches of sawdust.
9. Surfaces All surfaces beneath low obstacles are free of hazards that have the potential to
cause injury when crawled upon.
10. Condition a. Designated course is free of tripping hazards.
b. Course surface is well maintained to prevent injury in case of falls.
c. Course surface is raked and policed prior to each use.
d. Course surface is free of large rocks, stones, or concrete materials that may
cause injury in the event of a fall.
11. Safety Safety Office staff conducts semi-annual inspections.
93
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Remarks:
Table C-2
General inspection criteria checklist, continued
C-2. Obstacle specific design criteria
The following criteria supplement sketches found in TC 3-22.20, and DA Corps of Engineer
Drawing DEF 028-13-95, Obstacle Course Layout Plan.
a. Climbing ropes that are 1 1/2 inches wide and either straight or knotted.
b. Walls 7 or 8 feet high.
c. Ground covering should be maintained to prevent excessive erosion and compaction.
d. This criteria applies to the following specific obstacle courses:
(1) Obstacles for jumping (see figure C-2).
Figure C-2. Obstacles for jumping
(2) Obstacles for dodging (see figure C-3).
94
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-3. Obstacles for dodging
(3) Obstacles for climbing and surmounting (see figure C-4).
Figure C-4. Obstacles for vertical climbing and surmounting
(4) Horizontal traversing (see figure C-5).
Figure C-5. Obstacles for horizontal traversing
95
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(5) Obstacles for crawling (see figure C-6).
Figure C-6. Obstacles for crawling
(6) Obstacles for vaulting (see figure C-7).
Figure C-7. Obstacle for vaulting
(7) Obstacles for balancing (see figure C-8).
96
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-8. Obstacle for balancing

C-3. IMT obstacle course checklist
Figure C-9 provides an obstacle course inspection and standardization criteria.
a. See table C-3 for the IMT obstacle course administrative general inspection criteria.
b. See table C-4 for the IMT obstacle course general inspection criteria.
97
TRADOC Pam 385-1
IMT Obstacle Course Evaluator Information
Obstacle Course: _____________________________________________________________
Location: ____________________________________ Date of Inspection: ______________
Inspector:
Name: _______________________________ Organization: ________________________
POC:
Name: _______________________________ Organization: _________________________
Phone: ____________________________________________________________________
1. Courses will be evaluated to identify any safety hazards/concerns. Deficiencies found during
the inspection will be annotated and corrective actions initiated by the responsible organization.
2. This evaluation will also assist in standardizing courses used at TRADOC activities.
3. Obstacle categories: standard, nonstandard, and other.
Note: Where indicated on checklist, “fall protection” refers to devices or systems emplaced
beneath obstacles and at least six feet to the sides of obstacles presenting a fall hazard, to prevent
injury during falls; “fall arrest systems” are devices attached to personnel to limit the distance of
falls; and “surface” refers to the area beneath and around obstacles, to include travel lanes.
Impact absorbing material depth under obstacles is 18 inches for sand, 12 inches of shredded
rubber, and 24 inches for saw dust. Sand and sawdust must be tilled or turned at least annually
to combat settling and ensure impact absorbance.
4. Standards for Conditioning/Endurance Courses are a combination of those found in TC 3-

22.20; Engineer Drawing DEF 028-13-95, Obstacle Course Layout Plan; and TRADOC
Regulation 350-6.
Figure C-9. IMT obstacle course evaluator information
98
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-3
IMT obstacle course administrative general inspection criteria
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1 Training a. Training event is supported by TSP, program of instruction, or lesson
requirement plan.
b. SOPs are published and on hand at each course.
2 Administrative a. All ropes used for surmounting and suspension have condition service
logs available.
b. Weight testing logs are maintained for nets.
3 CRM a. Generic risk assessment is completed and maintained on training site.
b. Daily risk assessment is completed and onsite during training,
identifying hazards associated with personnel, equipment, and
environment.
4 Inspections a. Copy of last professional safety staff’s safety inspection report is onsite.
b. Copy of daily inspection is maintained at training site.
c. A list of all current deficiencies is maintained by the responsible
organization.
d. Copies of current work orders are maintained by the responsible
organization.
5 Accident A list of all injuries sustained on obstacles is maintained by the responsible
trends organization and safety office.
Remarks:
99
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-4
IMT obstacle course general inspection criteria
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1 Wood a. There are no signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact damage.
timbers b. There are no protruding nails or splinters to cause injury when obstacle is
negotiated.
c. All timbers are securely connected together without excess separation
between joints.
2 Wall a. All boards are securely attached to structure with proper hardware.
boards b. All boards free of protruding nails, splinters, rot, or damage.
c. Edges of boards rounded/smooth where used to support individual’s
weight.
3 Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated
type/size/placement.
b. All anchors are made of 3-strand galvanized guy wire or larger.
allow for adjustment.
d. Anchor cables are not used to support obstacles not properly constructed
or improperly emplaced in the ground.
e. All cable clamps are positioned with U-bolt placed on the dead or short
end of cable.
4 Fiber ropes a. All ropes are free of rips, tears, cuts, frays, rot, or unraveled sections due
to age, excessive wear, or contact with the ground.
c. Ropes are securely mounted to supporting timbers with ends tied/taped.
d. Ends of ropes are tied in a knot or wrapped to prevent fraying.
e. Condition/service logs are maintained on all ropes used for surmounting
and suspension.
5 Design Obstacle adheres to blue print specifications.
Remarks:
100
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-4
IMT obstacle course general inspection criteria, continued
AREA STANDARD GO NO
GO
6 Fall a. All nets meet American National Standards Institute (ANSI) load bearing
protection standard for personnel (ANSI 10.11/OSHA 1926.105) 3.5-inch nylon mesh,
17,500 lb impact resistant.
b. All nets designed for fall protection extend 8 feet out from point of potential
fall.
c. Forged steel hooks are used to fasten nets to its supports.
d. Nets are weight tested after initial installation and before being used as a fall
protection system, whenever relocated, after major repair and every 6 months.
The drop-test shall consist of 400 pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 + or - 2 inches
(76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped into the net from the highest
walking/working surface at which employees are exposed to fall hazards, but not
from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the commander can
demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test required by 29 CFR
1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated competent person) shall
certify that the net and net installation is in compliance with 29 CFR
1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification record prior to the net being used as
a fall protection system. The certification record must include an identification
of the net and net installation for which the certification record is being prepared;
the date that it was determined that the identified net and net installation were in
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature of the person making
the determination and certification. The most recent certification record for each
net and net installation shall be available at the training site for inspection.
e. All nets are suspended below high obstacles (in excess of 10 feet) have
padding or small mesh material to prevent limbs from penetrating net.
f. Pole-vaulting pads are in good condition with no tears, holes, or loose
material, which can trip personnel when dismounting.
g. All pole-vaulting pads are placed properly at base of designated high
obstacles.
7 Padding a. All padding on timbers is in good condition without signs of damage.
on b. Pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement when
timbers impacted.
8 Base a. Base containment box is adequate for containment of absorbent material

contain- located at base of obstacle.
ment box b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
c. Containment box is large enough to dismount from obstacle without causing
injury.
d. Containment box is filled with either 18 inches of sand, 12 inches of shredded
rubber, or 24 inches of sawdust.
9 Surfaces All surfaces beneath low obstacles are free of hazards with the potential to cause
injury.
10 Course a. Designated course is free of tripping hazards.
condition b. Course surface is well maintained to prevent injury in case of falls.
c. Course surface is raked and policed prior to each use.
d. Course surface is free of large rocks, stones, or concrete materials that may
cause injury in the case of a fall.
11 Safety Professional safety staff reviews obstacle construction plans and conducts
semiannual inspections.
101
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Remarks:
C-4. Obstacle course specific inspection criteria
a. The accompanying checklists and sketches supplement TC 3-22.20 and DA Corps of

Engineer Drawings DEF 028-13-95, Obstacle Course Layout Plan, and TRADOC Regulation
350-6. They serve as minimum construction/safety standards for obstacle courses used by IMT
facilities.
b. The “jump and land” and “swinger” are not included and will not be used. These obstacles
are conducive to lower extremity injuries.
c. Safety equipment (nets, pads, ground covering) should be procured from reliable sources,
inspected and tested frequently, and replaced before deterioration/failure.
d. Tables and figures are provided for specific courses.
(1) See table C-5 and figure C-10 for “the tough one.”
102
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-5
The tough one checklist
AREA STANDARD GO NO
GO
1 Wood a. There are no signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact
timbers damage.
b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer
drawings and TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
c. There are no protruding nails or splinters that may cause injury
when obstacle is negotiated.
d. All timbers are connected securely together without excess
separation between joints.
2 Hardware All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type,
size, and placement.
3 Design Professional safety staff reviews obstacle construction plans.
4 Fall a. All nets meet ANSI load bearing standard for personnel (ANSI
protection 10.11/OSHA 1926.105) 3.5-inch nylon mesh, 17,500 lb impact
resistant.
b. All nets designed for fall protection extend 8 feet out from point of
potential fall.
c. Forged steel hooks are used to fasten net to its supports.
d. Nets are weight tested after initial installation and before being
used as a fall protection system, whenever relocated, after major repair
and every 6 months. The drop-test shall consist of 400 pound (180 kg)
bag of sand 30 + or - 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped
into the net from the highest walking/working surface at which
employees are exposed to fall hazards, but not from less than 42
inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the commander can
demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test required
by 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated
competent person) shall certify that the net and net installation is in
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification
record prior to the net being used as a fall protection system. The
certification record must include an identification of the net and net
installation for which the certification record is being prepared; the
date that it was determined that the identified net and net installation
were in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature of
the person making the determination and certification. The most
recent certification record for each net and net installation shall be
available at the training site for inspection.
e. Pole-vaulting pads are in good condition with no tears, holes, or
loose material, which can trip personnel when dismounting.
f. Pole-vaulting pads are placed properly at base of designated
obstacles.
5 Base a. Base containment box is adequate for containment of absorbent
containment material located at base of obstacle.
box b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or
instability.
c. Containment box is large enough to dismount from obstacle
without causing injury.
Remarks:
103
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-10. The tough one
(2) See table C-6 and figure C-11 for the “inverted rope descent/the slide for life.”
104
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-6
Inverted rope descent/the slide for life
AREA STANDARD GO NO GO
Timbers damage.
b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings
and TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
c. There are no protruding nails or splinters that may cause injury when
obstacle is negotiated.
d. All timbers are connected securely together without excess separation
between joints.
2 Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type and
size.
c. Take-up galvanized turnbuckles are used at anchor points of each cable
to allow for adjustment.
end of cable.
3 Fiber a. All ropes are free of rips, tears, cuts, frays, rot, or unraveled sections due
ropes to age, excessive wear, or contact with the ground.
c. Ropes are securely mounted to supporting timbers with ends tied and
taped.
105
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-6
Inverted rope descent/the slide for life, continued
AREA STANDARD YES NO

5 Fall a. All nets meet ANSI load bearing standard for personnel (ANSI
protection 10.11/OSHA 1926.105) 3.5-inch nylon mesh, 17,500 lb impact resistant.
b. All nets designed for fall protection extend 8 feet out from edge of
obstacle.
months. The drop-test shall consist of 400 pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 +
or - 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped into the net from the
highest walking/working surface at which employees are exposed to fall
hazards, but not from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the
commander can demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test
required by 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification
record prior to the net being used as a fall protection system. The
certification record must include an identification of the net and net
installation for which the certification record is being prepared; the date that
it was determined that the identified net and net installation were in
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature of the person
making the determination and certification. The most recent certification
record for each net and net installation shall be available at the training site
for inspection.
e. All nets suspended below high obstacles (excess of 10 feet) have padding
or small mesh material to prevent limbs from penetrating mesh.
g. Pole-vaulting pads are properly placed at base of designated obstacles.
c. Containment box is large enough to dismount from obstacle without
causing injury.
Remarks:
106
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-11. Inverted rope descent/the slide for life
(3) See table C-7 and figure C-12 for the “confidence climb.”
107
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-7
Confidence climb checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings and
TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
d. All timbers are securely connected together without excess separation
between joints.
size.
end of cable.
4 Fall a. Pole-vaulting pads are in good condition with no tears, holes, or loose
protection material, which can trip personnel when dismounting.
b. All pole-vaulting pads are properly placed at base of designated obstacles.
5 Base contain- a. Base containment box is adequate for containment of absorbent material
ment box located at base of obstacle.
b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
causing injury.
Remarks:
108
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-12. Confidence climb
(4) See table C-8 and figure C-13 for the “skyscraper.”
109
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-8
Skyscraper checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings.
between joints.
2 Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type and size.
d. Anchor cables are not used to support obstacles not properly constructed or
improperly emplaced in the ground.
e. All cable clamps are positioned with U-bolt placed on the dead or short end
of cable.
4 Fall a. All nets meet American National Standards Institute (ANSI) load bearing
protection standard for personnel (ANSI 10.11/OSHA 1926.105) 3.5-inch nylon mesh,
17,500 lb impact resistant.
b. All nets designed for fall protection extend 8 feet out from point of potential
fall.
months. The drop-test shall consist of 400 pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 + or
- 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped into the net from the highest
walking/working surface at which employees are exposed to fall hazards, but
not from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the commander
can demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test required by 29
CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated competent person)
shall certify that the net and net installation is in compliance with 29 CFR
1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification record prior to the net being used
as a fall protection system. The certification record must include an
identification of the net and net installation for which the certification record is
being prepared; the date that it was determined that the identified net and net
installation were in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature
of the person making the determination and certification. The most recent
certification record for each net and net installation shall be available at the
training site for inspection
e. All nets suspended below high obstacles (excess of 10 feet) have padding to
prevent limbs from penetrating net.
g. Pole-vaulting pads are properly placed at base of designated obstacles.
110
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Figure C-13. Skyscraper
(5) See table C-9 and figure C-14 for the “belly robber.”
111
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-9
Belly Robber checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
. timbers damage.
b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings.
between joints.
e. All timbers are free of chemical coatings or substances that affect
Soldier’s ability to negotiate obstacle.
2 Hardware All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type and
size.
Remarks:
Figure C-14. Belly robber
(6) See table C-10 and figure C-15 for “the Tarzan.”
112
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-10
The Tarzan checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings
and TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
between joints.
e. Rungs on horizontal ladder are modified to support Gender Integrated
Training (diameter is reduced to accommodate smaller hand sizes).
2 Hardware All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type and size.
Remarks:
Figure C-15. The tarzan
(7) See Table C-11 and Figure C-16 for the “Low belly over.”
113
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-11
Low belly over checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1 Wood a. No signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact damage.
between joints.
2 Hardware All bolts, nuts, washers are in place and of the designated type/ size.
3 Fiber All ropes are free of rips, tears, cuts, frays, rot, or unraveled sections due
ropes to age, excessive wear, or contact with the ground.
5 Padding a. All padding on timbers is in good condition no signs of damage.
on timbers b. Pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement
when impacted.
Remarks:
Figure C-16. Low belly over
(8) See table C-12 and figure C-17 for “the dirty name.”
114
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-12
The dirty name checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
between joints.
4 Padding a. All padding on timbers is in good condition without signs of damage.
on timbers b. Pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement when
impacted.
c. Containment box is large enough to dismount from obstacle without injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-17. The dirty name
115
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(8) See table C-13 and figure C-18 for “the tough nut.”
Table C-13
The tough nut checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
drawings.
c. There are no protruding nails or splinters that may cause injury
when obstacle is negotiated.
d. All timbers are securely connected together without excess
2 Hardware All wire/bolts are of the designated type and size.
3 Design a. Professional safety staff reviews obstacle construction plans.
b. Center height of “X” does not exceed 30 inches.
Remarks:
Figure C-18. The tough nut
(9) See table C-14 and figure C-19 for the “belly crawl.”
116
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-14
Belly crawl checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
drawings.
2 Hardware All wires, screws, or nails are in place and of the designated type and
size.
4 Surfaces All surfaces beneath low surfaces are free of hazards with the potential
to cause injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-19. Belly crawl
(10) See table C-15 and figure C-20 for the “inclining wall.”
117
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-15
Inclining wall checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
drawings.
d. All timbers are securely connected together without excess
2 Wall a. All boards are securely attached to structure with proper hardware.
boards b. All boards free of protruding nails, splinters, rot, or damage.
c. Edges of boards rounded/smooth where used to support individual’s
weight..
3 Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers in place and of the designated type, size,
and placement.
b. All cable clamps are positioned with U-bolt placed on the dead or
short end of cable.
Remarks:
Figure C-20. Inclining wall
(10) See table C-16 and figure C-21 for the “swing, stop, and jump.”
118
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-16
Swing, stop, and jump checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
between joints.
size.
b. Surmounting ropes have knots at ends or are taped to prevent fraying.
3 Fiber ropes All ropes are free of rips, tears, cuts, frays, rot, or unraveled sections due
to age, excess wear, or contact with the ground.
5 Padding on a. All padding on timbers is in good condition without signs of damage.
timbers b. Pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement
when impacted.
containment material located at base of obstacle.
box b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
causing injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-21. Swing, stop, and jump
119
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(11) See table C-17 and figure C-22 for the “six vaults.”
Table C-17
Six vaults checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
between joints.
size.
Remarks:
Figure C-22. Six vaults
(12) See table C-18 and figure C-23 for the “easy balancer.”
120
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-18
Easy balancer checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
timbers damage.
between joints.
size.
containmen material located at base of obstacle.
t box b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
causing injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-23. Easy balancer
(13) See table C-19 and figure C-24 for the “low wire.”
121
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-19
Low wire checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
between joints.
2 Hardware All wire, nails, or screws are in place and of the designated type and size.
4 Surfaces All surfaces beneath low obstacles are free of hazards with the potential to
cause injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-24. Low wire
(14) See table C-20 and figure C-25 for “the belly buster.”
122
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-20
The belly buster checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
between joints.
2 Hardware a. All bolts, nuts, and washers are in place and of the designated type/size.
b. Soldiers are warned to keep hands and fingers away from parts of log
resting on cradle.
c. Soldiers are informed not to rock or roll log while others are negotiating
obstacle.
containment located at base of obstacle.
causing injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-25. Belly buster
123
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(15) See table C-21 and figure C-26 for “the belly buster.”
Table C-21
Hip-hip checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
Timbers b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings.
between joints.
e. All timbers are free of chemical coatings or substances that affect Soldier’s
ability to negotiate obstacle.
4 Surfaces All surfaces beneath low obstacles are free of hazards with the potential to
cause injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-26. Hip-hip
(16) See table C-22 and figure C-27 for the “reverse climb.”
124
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-22
Reverse climb checklist
AREA STANDARD GO NO
GO
between joints.
4 Padding on a. All padding on timbers is in good condition without signs of damage.
timbers b. Pads are securely attached to the timber supports to prevent movement
when impacted.
containment located at base of obstacle.
injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-27. Reverse climb
125
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(17) See table C-23 and figure C-28 for “the weaver.”
Table C-23
The weaver checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1 Wood timbers a. There are no signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact damage.
between joints.
containment box located at base of obstacle.
b. Containment box does not display signs of rot, damage, or instability.
causing injury.
Remarks:
Figure C-28. The weaver
126
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(18) See table C-24 and figure C-29 for the “balancing logs.”
Table C-24
Balancing logs checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
between joints.
Remarks:
Figure C-29. Balancing logs
(19) See table C-25 and figure C-30 for the “island hoppers.”
127
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-25
Island hoppers checklist
NO
AREA STANDARD GO
GO
1 Wood timbers a. There are no signs of rot, warping, severe weathering, or impact
damage.
Remarks:
Figure C-30. Island hoppers
(20) See table C-26 for the “fitness tower.”
128
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table C-26
Fitness tower checklist
Area Standard GO NO
GO
1 Adminis- Copies of engineer drawings are maintained at the local safety office/facility
tration engineers.
timbers b. All timbers meet specified dimensions as stated in engineer drawings and
TRADOC Regulation 350-6.
d. All timbers are connected securely together without excess separation
between joints.
size.
b. All anchors are made of 3-strand galvanized guy wire.
end of cable.
f. All attachment points are tested to ensure each will support 1.5 times usage
weight.
g. Certified rappel masters inspect all ropes used for rappelling prior to each
use.
h. Ropes used for surmounting are all 1.5 inches in diameter.
5 Fall a. All areas in and around tower facility are covered with non-compressed
protection wood chips, mulch, sawdust, or shredded tire rubber.
b. All nets designed for fall protection extend 8 feet out from point of
potential fall.
months. The drop-test shall consist of 400 pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 +
or - 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in diameter dropped into the net from the
highest walking/working surface at which employees are exposed to fall
hazards, but not from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the
commander can demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the drop-test
required by 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander (or a designated
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502(c)(4)(i) by preparing a certification record
prior to the net being used as a fall protection system. The certification record
must include an identification of the net and net installation for which the
certification record is being prepared; the date that it was determined that the
identified net and net installation were in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502
(c)(3) and the signature of the person making the determination and
certification. The most recent certification record for each net and net
installation shall be available at the training site for inspection.
e. Nets with padding are placed beneath all suspended bridges.
129
TRADOC Pam 385-1
AREA STANDARD GO NO
GO
6 Rappelling a. Instructors working at the top of tower are secured to tower
with fall arrest system/attached harness.
b. Only certified and current rappel masters conduct rappel
operations.
c. All anchor point have been tested to support loads of 5000 lbs.
d. All anchor points are secure and free of damage.
e. Top edge of rappel wall is padded to protect rope from cuts or
abrasion.
f. Protective padding at top of rappel wall is tightly secured on all
edges.
g. Rappel wallboards are free of damage, rot, protruding nails,
and secured to tower with proper hardware.
h. Rappel landing area is free of obstructions and hazards.
i. Landing areas extends an uninterrupted distance of 15 feet from
base of tower.
j. Landing area is cushioned with 24 inches of non-compressed
wood chips, mulch, sawdust, 18 inches of sand, or 12 inches of
shredded tire rubber.
k. Landing area cushioning material held in place by a
containment barrier (timbers/sand bags).
7 Ladders a. All ladders are inspected for structural integrity.
b. Rungs spacing on ladders do not exceed 36 inches.
c. Nets are placed under all rope bridges.
d. Nets are weight tested after initial installation and before being
used as a fall protection system, whenever relocated, after major
repair and every 6 months. The drop-test shall consist of 400
pound (180 kg) bag of sand 30 + or - 2 inches (76 + or - 5 cm) in
diameter dropped into the net from the highest walking/working
surface at which employees are exposed to fall hazards, but not
from less than 42 inches (1.1 m) above that level. When the
commander can demonstrate that it is unreasonable to perform the
drop-test required by 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(4)(i), the commander
(or a designated competent person) shall certify that the net and
net installation is in compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502(c)(4)(i) by
preparing a certification record prior to the net being used as a fall
protection system. The certification record must include an
identification of the net and net installation for which the
certification record is being prepared; the date that it was
determined that the identified net and net installation were in
compliance with 29 CFR 1926.502 (c)(3) and the signature of the
person making the determination and certification. The most
recent certification record for each net and net installation shall be
available at the training site for inspection.
e. Nets used for fall protection have padding installed to prevent
limbs from passing through webbing.
Remarks:
130
TRADOC Pam 385-1
C-5. Fall Protection
a. Fall protection will be provided for those obstacles designated as high, or have the ability to
cause injury during a fall, or required by design.
b. The areas under and around obstacles will be covered with an impact reducing material
appropriate for preventing serious injury in the event a Soldier falls while negotiating subject
obstacle.
c. When purchasing fall protection equipment required for an obstacle, installations will
ensure equipment meets or exceeds standards without creating a greater hazard. Where impact-
reducing material is required, sand, wood chips, saw dust, or shredded tire rubber is sufficient.
d. Below are required essential items of fall protection, identified by obstacle.
(1) “The tough one:”
(a) Wood chips/sand/or shredded rubber beneath obstacle.
(b) Pole vault safety pad placed at base of obstacle.
(c) Safety net placed beneath obstacle, extended 8 feet out from point of potential fall. All
netting will be rated for outside use and meet OSHA specifications for fall protection.
(d) Eye bolt or hook for instructor safety harness positioned at top of obstacle.
(2) “Inverted rope descent/slide for life:”
(a) Instructor platform with eye bolt or metal hook to secure safety harness.
(b) Net placed beneath the length of descent rope.
(c) Padding placed on net beneath descent rope.
(d) Pads at end of net near release point.
(e) Pole vault pad at the base of release point.
(f) The area under and around (minimum of 6 feet) obstacles covered with impact reducing
material.
(3) “Confidence climb:”
(a) Eye bolt or hook for instructor’s safety harness at top of obstacle.
131
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(b) Pole vault padding on both sides at base of obstacle (4 each @ 5 feet x 8 feet x 2 feet).
(c) Ground around base of obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(4) “Skyscraper:”
(a) Pole vault padding at base of tower.
(b) Netting extended from first level (optional).
(5) “Belly robber:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(6) “The Tarzan:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(7) “Low belly over:”
(a) Ground covered with impact reducing material.
(b) Tops of side rails covered with padding.
(8) “The dirty name:”
(a) Padding on tops of upper side braces.
(b) Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(9) “The tough nut:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material
(optional).
(10) “Belly crawl:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(11) “Inclining wall:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(12) “High step over” - Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(13) “Swing, stop, and jump:”
(a) Padding on tops of front support logs.
(14) “Six vaults:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(15) “Easy balancer:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(16) “Low wire” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
132
TRADOC Pam 385-1
(17) “The belly buster:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(18) “Hip-hip:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(19) “Reverse climb:”
(a) Padding on the tops of rear support logs.
(20) “The weaver:”
(a) Pole vault padding beneath center of obstacle.
(21) “Balancing logs:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
(22) “Island hopper:” Ground beneath obstacle covered with impact reducing material.
e. Safety equipment (nets, pads, and ground covering) should be procured from reliable
sources. If shredded rubber is used, get samples prior to purchasing. Several companies are
selling shredded rubber contaminated with petroleum products that may cause allergic reaction in
some people. When procuring netting, ensure provider includes design specifications and usage
restrictions.
f. To ensure maximum life of safety equipment, inspect on a regular interval and store away
from extreme weather conditions when possible.
g. See figure C-31 for required obstacle information.
Obstacle information
Total number of obstacles: ______________
Number of standard obstacles: _______________
Number of nonstandard obstacles: _______________
Number of modified obstacles: _______
Total injuries occurring at each obstacle course:
Remarks:
Figure C-31 Obstacle Information
133
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Appendix D
Rappel Tower Site Inspection Criteria
D-1. Rappel tower site inspection criteria

The minimum inspection criteria for towers and other facilities utilized for military rappelling
training is shown in figure D-1 and table D-1.
Name, title, organization, and phone number of inspector(s):
Date of inspection:
Name and location of tower:
Date of tower construction:
Built by:
Owned by:
Last date of any MAJOR modifications:

(If applicable, list modification, and by who performed, in addition to date; otherwise state not
applicable.)
Date of previous inspection:
Name, title, and organization of previous inspector:
Is a copy of previous inspection available?
Name, title, organization, and phone number of local point of contact:
Date of last structural inspection:
Date of last anchor point load test:
Signature of inspector(s):
Figure D-1. Rappel tower site inspection information
134
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table D-1
Rappel tower inspection criteria checklist
AREA STANDARD YES NO NA
1 Inspect a. Is the tower structurally sound? Do structural support members appear
serviceable, free from deterioration, breaks, or damage?.
b. Are there any signs of insect infestation? [29 CFR 1910.141(a)(5)]
c. Are bolts that connect structural members or support cables serviceable
and properly connected/tightened?
d. Are stairs or ladders firmly attached to the tower?
e. Do stairs/fixed ladders comply with OSHA standards? [29 CFR
1910.24 and 29 CFR 1910.27]
f. Are all areas marked in yellow that pose a potential trip hazard or head
hazard? [29 CFR 1910.144(a)(3)]
g. Are the tower platform and all rappel rope stations accessible without
having to climb over any obstacles (guard rails, support cables, etc.)?
h. Is the tower deck free of slip/trip hazards such as water, protruding
nails/bolts/splinters, loose equipment, etc? [29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(ii) and
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(iii)]
i. Are the tower deck and any open areas (above 4’) not actively being
used for rappelling, guarded with guardrails? [29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1)]
j. Are all guard rails a minimum of 42” high and capable of withstanding
a side force of 200 lbs? [29 CFR 1910.23(e)(1) and 29 CFR
1910.23(e)(3)(iv)]
k. Are toe boards or similar barriers installed in all areas where personnel
could pass underneath? [29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1)]
l. Do all tower rope stations have primary and secondary anchor points?
m. Are all anchor points in serviceable condition and free of corrosion,
sharp edges, burrs, or grooves that could cut or damage ropes?
n. Have all anchor points been designed to ensure that they will
accommodate a weight of at least 5000 pounds for each Soldier attached?
[29 CFR 1910.66, appendix C (I)(c)(10)]
o. Is the rappel wall face area free of protruding nails, bolts, or splinters?
p. Is the rappel wall face area free of broken, loose, decayed, or missing
boards?
q. Is padding material in place on all edges that ropes and/or personnel
cross?
r. Is the edge padding in good condition and securely fastened?
s. Is the edge padding free from protruding nails, bolts, or other fasteners
that could fray or cut ropes or injure rappelers?
t. Are all structural areas of the tower properly padded that a rappeller
might contact during rappel operations?
u. Is the structural padding in serviceable condition, securely fastened,
and free from protruding nails, bolts, or fasteners?
v. Is the landing area free of obstructions and hazards?
w. Does the landing area extend an uninterrupted distance of 15 feet from
the tower base and at least 2 feet beyond the width of the base with
cushioning material in the event of a fall?
x. Is the landing area adequately cushioned in case of a fall (24 inches of
non-compressed wood chips, mulch, or sawdust; 12 inches of
commercially produced shredded rubber; or safety pads that offer similar
fall protection)?
y. Has the cushioning material in the landing area been loosened up prior
to use and, if large numbers of students are rappelling, are procedures in
place and equipment available to loosen it up again during training?
135
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Table D-1
Rappel tower inspection criteria checklist, continued
AREA STANDARD YES NO NA
2 Physical a. Is there a positive locking device on the ladder/steps or a locked
security fence around the tower that denies unauthorized access to the tower?
and fire b. Is there a prominently displayed warning sign that discourages
protection unauthorized use of the tower (for example, WARNING: OFF
criteria LIMITS TO UNAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL)?
c. Are NO SMOKING signs posted at the tower to preclude
potential ignition of cushioning materials?
3 CRM and a. Is there a current risk management worksheet on file and
training available onsite?
considera- b. Has the risk management worksheet been reviewed, approved,
tions and signed at the appropriate level?
c. Is the tower within 1 hour of an advanced trauma life support
facility?
d. Are certified combat life support or medical personnel and a
dedicated medical vehicle onsite to render emergency medical aid
and evacuation, if required?
e. Is training conducted in accordance with Training Circular 21-24
and the appropriate TSP?
f. Is there a current SOP available that delineates requirements for
instructors, students, support personnel, and other requirements?
g. Are properly “certified” instructors available to conduct rappel
training? (IF NO, DO NOT CONDUCT RAPPEL TRAINING!)
Name(s):
Location and date of certification:
4 Ropes and a. Are rappel ropes serviceable and properly inspected and stored?
equipment b. Are rope inspections and usage properly documented on DA
Form 5752-R (Rope Log (Usage and History))?
c. Are snap links serviceable (no excessive rust, sharp edges,
improper gate opening and closing, excessive pin movement,
missing pins, etc.)?
d. Are properly sized, serviceable, heavy leather gloves, and
protective headgear available for rappelers?
136
TRADOC Pam 385-1
Glossary
Section I
Abbreviations
ADSO additional duty safety officer

AIT advance individual training
AMC Army Materiel Command
ANSI American National Standards Institute
AR Army Regulation
ARA Army radiation authorizations
ARIMS Army Records Information Management System
ASO aviation safety officer
BCT basic combat training
CDSO collateral duty safety officer
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CLS combat lifesaver
CRM composite risk management
DA Department of the Army
DOD Department of Defense
DODI Department of Defense Instruction
DVD digital versatile disc
FM field manual
IAW in accordance with
IMT initial military training
LASER Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation
lb pound
MOA memorandum of agreement
NCO noncommissioned officer
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OHR operational hazard report
OPM Office of Personnel Management
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act
Pam pamphlet
POV privately owned vehicle
QASAS quality assurance specialist ammunition surveillance
RAC risk assessment code
RFR radiofrequency radiation
RSO radiation safety officer
SOHAC Safety and Occupational Health Advisory Council
SOP standing operating procedure
TB technical bulletin
TDA table of distribution and allowance
TRADOC U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
TRiPS Travel Risk Planning System
TSP training support package
137
TRADOC Pam 385-1
USACR/SC U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center/Safety Center
Section II
Terms
branch proponent
The service school that has primary responsibility for developing concepts, doctrine, tactics,
training, techniques, procedures, organizational designs, and materiel requirements for a
particular branch in the Army.
branch safety proponency

School commandants are the safety officers for their branch, responsible for integrating safety
into the development and employment of service school products (for example, doctrine,
organizations, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel, and facilities) and
monitoring safety performance of branch units and proponent materiel systems worldwide.
composite risk management (CRM)

Making trade off decisions between potential/expected loss/injury versus the mission benefit of
accepting the residual risk. CRM supports the commander's overall estimate and decisionmaking
process. The objective is to accomplish the mission safely by identifying and eliminating
unnecessary risk.
explosives
All items of ammunition; propellants, liquid and solid; high and low yield explosives;
pyrotechnics; and substances associated with the foregoing that present real and potential hazards
to life or property. The term includes any device or assembly of devices that contains an
explosive material. Examples are bombs, guided or unguided; water and land mines; depth
charges; non-nuclear warheads; explosive-loaded projectiles; explosive components of aircrew
escape systems; missile propellants; unguided missiles; pyrotechnic, illuminating, and signaling
devices; and cartridge-actuated tools, such as stud drivers.
manpower and personnel integration

A comprehensive management and technical program to enhance human performance and
reliability in the operation, maintenance, and use of weapon systems and equipment. Manpower
and personnel integration achieves this objective by integrating the full range of human factors--
engineering, manpower, personnel, training, system safety, and health hazard consideration--into
the materiel development.
residual hazard
A hazard that was not eliminated by design.
residual risk
Expected loss from a residual hazard. The risk remaining after one or more cycles of risk
reduction efforts.
138
TRADOC Pam 385-1
risk
An expected loss or danger resulting from a hazard. Risk is expressed in terms of estimated
severity and probability of injury or damage. Over time, uncontrolled HIGH level risks will
produce high levels of loss.
risk acceptance
A formal or implied decision to accept the consequences of a risk based on a risk assessment.
risk assessment
Evaluation of expected consequences of a risk against the benefits to gain from accepting the
risk.
safety assessment report

A formal, comprehensive summary of the safety data collected during the design and
development of a system. It includes the hazard potential of the item; provides risk assessments;
and recommends procedures or other corrective actions to reduce the exposure or consequences
of these hazards.
safety awareness
A consciousness of hazards, and the knowledge to avoid them or minimize their effect. Safety
awareness training gives leaders the knowledge and motivation to accomplish the mission, while
not unnecessarily jeopardizing the lives of personnel or readiness of equipment. Safety
awareness leads to a proactive approach that uses risk management to evaluate the risks and
eliminate those with inadequate benefits.
safety lesson learned

A safety or health-related warning, based on experience, which can be applied to current and
future operations and systems to prevent recurrence of the hazard.
system safety risk assessment (SSRA)

A document that comprehensively evaluates the residual risks of an operation, activity, or
materiel system and documents their acceptance by the materiel developer and combat
developer.
Section III
Special Abbreviations and Terms
This section contains no entries.
139

tp385 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

tp385 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

tp385 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Department of the Army *TRADOC Pamphlet 385-1

Headquarters, United States Army

THE TRADOC MODEL SAFETY PROGRAM AND SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE

FOR THE COMMANDER:

OFFICIAL: JOHN E. STERLING, JR.

CHARLES E. HARRIS III

Distribution. This pamphlet is available only on the TRADOC Homepage at

TRADOC Pamphlet 385-1

This revision, dated – 6 January 2012

o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with Army Regulation 385-10.

o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with 29 Code of Federal Regulation

o Updates procedures and standards to be in compliance with 29 Code of Federal Regulation

Table C-15. Inclining wall checklist .......................................................................................... 118

This page left blank intentionally.

b. The self-assessment guide provides commanders and safety managers a standardized

1-3. Explanation of abbreviations and terms

c. Universal in scope, providing effective support to current operations, yet remaining

2-2. Safety program success

a. Ownership. Personal involvement of commanders, leaders, and supervisors at each level of

3-1. Composite risk management (CRM)

(a) First, leaders must understand the decisionmaking process of CRM.

b. Commanders/commandants must ensure CRM is institutionalized in all school products,

(1) Extremely high risk: Senior commander of general officer grade.

(4) Low risk: As designated by the senior commander.

3-2. Inspections, assessments, and evaluations

3-4. Accident reporting, investigation, and analysis

3-5. Education, training, and safety awareness

3-6. Branch safety/CRM integration

3-7. Additional/Collateral duty safety program

3-8. Safety and Occupational Health Advisory Council (SOHAC)

3-9. Emergency action plans

3-10. Initial military training (IMT)

3-11. Motor vehicle accident prevention

4-1. Implementation and use

Army Aviation Accident Prevention

Department of Defense Directive 5000.1

Department of Defense Directive 6055.9E

Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1200

Title 23 CFR 1230

Title 29 CFR 1910

Title 29 CFR 1926

Title 29 CFR 1960

TRADOC Regulation 350-6

TRADOC Regulation 350-16

TRADOC Regulation 350-29

TRADOC Regulation 350-70

TRADOC Regulation 385-2

National Fire Protection Association 72

DODI 4500.9-R, part II

Title 29 CFR 1926.59

Title 33 CFR 183

This section contains no entries.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration Form 300

B-1. Program management

Table B-1 Program management

Program Management continued YES NO Remarks

Standard: AR 385-10, paragraph 1-4m(9), Table 1-1

Documentation: Safety regulation, SOPs, memorandums,

Does the commander/commandant have a single source