DO s2016 039
DO s2016 039
DO s2016 039
2016)
I. Rationale
While there are a myriad of topics to probe in the education sector, the
Department’s research thrusts are strategically geared towards supporting
its mission “to protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality,
equitable, culture-based, and complete basic education where:
1
Teachers facilitate learning and constantly nurture every
learner.
Administrators and staff, as stewards of the institution,
ensure an enabling and supportive environment for effective
learning to happen.
Family, community, and other stakeholders are actively
engaged and share responsibility for developing lifelong
learners.”4
These emergent priority themes are captured in the Research Agenda. In this
document, the themes have been translated into questions to prompt
scientific inquiry and yield significant findings that can improve the quality
and delivery of basic education in the Philippines.
The Research Agenda identifies research topics that will fill in critical
knowledge gaps and respond to pressing concerns in Philippine basic
education, consistent with the Department’s vision, mission, and target
outcomes and in line with local and international developments in the
sector. By articulating specific study areas, this document seeks to:
II. Scope
The Basic Education Research Agenda will guide all DepEd researchers from
schools, divisions, regions, and central office. In the same way, the Agenda
will also be shared for consideration of external partners, such as research
institutions, other government agencies, higher education institutions,
teacher education institutions, and non-government organizations, among
others. However, this document will not limit research inquiries. Rather, it
will encourage researchers to go beyond, especially for pressing and
emerging education issues not covered by the Agenda.
This will be a six-year Research Agenda and will be subject to annual, mid-,
and end-term review.
2
III. Definition of Terms
The Research Agenda shall guide DepEd and its stakeholders, both at the
national and local levels, in gathering and examining evidence that can
inform the Department’s planning, policy, and program development. The
creation of regional and division research agendas is encouraged to echo
local concerns that fit seamlessly into the national agenda.
The consultation process for the preparation of this agenda was conducted
in two phases. First, a comprehensive problem tree analysis was done by key
DepEd offices to identify challenges in the education system. This was later
transformed into a solution tree to match existing DepEd policies and
programs already addressing the identified challenges. Executive
pronouncements, official documents, and professional expertise influenced
the initial prioritization and analysis of the items in the Agenda. The
resulting tree was at first uneven in terms of depth, as can be expected, but
it provided distinct directions for the Research Agenda.
The second phase was the consultation and validation of the thematically-
clustered draft research questions. This phase included purposively-selected
but nationally-representative group of key informants consisting of internal
stakeholders from different DepEd offices across all governance levels, as
5A team from the World Bank led the agenda development process with the support
of colleagues from the Australia Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (BEST,
ACTRC, RCTQ).
3
well as external partners. Two major activities6 were conducted to ensure
that the draft agenda is relevant, timely, and aligned with the mission,
vision, values, and the mandates of the Department. Representatives from
the regional, division, and school levels participated in the first activity,
where the research themes and questions were subjected to review and
revision. A more thematic approach was highlighted in the second activity,
where DepEd offices working within the research themes further enhanced
the research questions. These activities yielded numerous comments at
various levels of implementation and sophistication, which were later
synthesized to finalize the contents of the Basic Education Research Agenda.
Excellence
Given the influence of research on education decisions and actions, quality
research is expected. Excellence demands that the inquiry is relevant and
researchable; methods applied are appropriate; and findings are logical,
coherent, and supported by data. Although the research design may vary
depending on the nature of the study, researchers must apply rigorous and
empirical methods grounded on scientific inquiry.
Integrity
The highest ethical standards shall be applied to basic education research.
Whether or not human subjects are involved, researchers must ensure that
the study will not cause people harm. Research participants should have
informed consent, must be cognizant about the general purpose of the study
and should not be exposed to unusual risk. Consistent with the principle of
excellence, integrity also requires honesty and accuracy in the collection,
analysis, and reporting of data.
Openness
DepEd acknowledges the importance of collaboration in its work, including
in research. Openness emphasizes the need to engage more partners in
basic education research and to employ multi-disciplinary perspectives. The
same likewise ensures truthful and timely dissemination of research results
and data sets within the bounds of confidentiality to DepEd and other
stakeholders for appreciation and application, as well as peer evaluation.
6The second phase was facilitated through the Basic Education Sector
Transformation (BEST), Philippines-Australia six-year basic education program.
4
Figure 1: Conceptual Framework of the Basic Education Research Agenda
While the themes generally support DepEd’s overall mandate, each theme
has unique contributions to the Department’s target outcomes and mission.
For instance, Child Protection directly enhances the access outcome, while
Teaching and Learning squarely impacts on the quality of education.
In the same manner, the identified themes dovetail with the Department’s
mission, particularly its four key stakeholders. Teaching and Learning
responds to students’ and teachers’ needs, Child Protection focuses on the
students, Human Resource Development addresses concerns of teaching and
non-teaching staff, while Governance centers on administration and
stakeholder engagement.
Each of the research themes is described below with a brief discussion of its
general background and coverage. The themes have been expanded into
research questions to focus the investigation and shape the design of a
study. All questions are illustrative and need not be phrased verbatim to
allow flexibility in the research design. The stated research questions serve
as concrete starting points for discussion and may evolve upon further
analysis. It is thus possible to combine or reformulate research questions.
Each research theme contains sub-themes that have been broken down into
general research questions. Topics under each general research question
have been identified to highlight more specific areas of interest, and not
5
necessarily to limit its scope. Researchers are welcome to explore other
topics that likewise address the identified sub-themes. Explanation is
provided to offer context to the intention of the research questions and
topics.
While the themes and questions appear as stand-alone areas of inquiry, the
Research Agenda recognizes that many of the listed topics relate to each
other. Moreover, the Department recognizes that the following cut across the
four themes of the Agenda: (1) Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
(DRRM); (2) Gender and Development; and (3) Inclusive Education. Some
questions and sub-topics expressly cover these areas of concern. Also, as
necessary, separate research questions under these areas have been
identified to cater to more specific concerns.
6
o Alternative Learning System (ALS)
o Alternative Delivery Modes (ADMs)
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA)
Child-centered approach
Emerging good practices
ICT in Education
Differentiated instruction
Individual learning styles and
multiple intelligences
Collaborative learning
Classroom management (e.g. positive
discipline)
On the other hand, Curriculum will focus on the contribution of the new K
to 12 curriculum on improving learning outcomes. With the integration of
skills and competencies such as DRR and CCA in the delivery of the new
curriculum, looking at effectiveness is crucial. Key topics under Curriculum
include, but are not limited to, the following:
This Agenda will study the developmental, social, and behavioural effects of
the teaching-learning process on Learners, who are the primary clients of
basic education. Key topics under Learners include, but are not limited to,
the following:
DepEd has defined the official K to12 Assessment Framework 7, which lays
out current policies and shows the current thinking on the matter. As a key
7 Department Order No. 8, series of 2015.
7
component of the teaching-learning process, Assessment requires further
study to refine the details of the framework. Key topics under Assessment
include, but are not limited to, the following:
8
General Research Questions Topics
What factors affect the Teacher’s profile (e.g. specialization,
achievement of learning training, experience)
outcomes? Learning environment
Learning resources
Language
Assessment
Governance
How does achievement of Regional, division, and school variation
expected learning outcomes School typology
vary in terms of practices per Role of leaders
region, division, and/or Geographic, political, and economic
school? factors
Partnerships (i.e. LGUs, other private
and public organizations and
institutions)
General Research
Specific Topics General Topics
Questions
How can DepEd best • History of
address the following problem
child protection • Prevalence
concerns: • Factors
Bullying Physical Bullying contributing to
Emotional Bullying the problem (e.g.
Cyber Bullying access to
Teenage Pregnancy Reproductive Health technology,
Education environment)
• Vulnerable
9
Child Abuse Grave Child Rights segments (e.g.
Violations (GCRVs) gender, location,
SHS Work Immersion economic status,
Context persons with
disabilities,
Addiction Substance Abuse children in
Online Gaming conflict with the
Social Media law, children at
risk)
• Effects (e.g.
Media Consumption Internet physical, mental,
TV and film emotional, social)
Magazines • Policies/
Radio programs/
interventions
• Learning
interventions
• Monitoring and
evaluation of
interventions
• Partnerships
Primary focus is given to teachers due to their frontline role in reaching out
to learners. Research questions probe into the teachers’ existing
qualifications and competency requirements vis-á-vis the needs of the K to
12 and special education programs such as ALS. The topics extend to
teacher education institutions, particularly on ways to upgrade pre-service
preparation and DepEd’s role in providing continuous quality training.
Similarly, developing the support structure of DepEd through its non-
teaching personnel is an important area of inquiry. Key topics under
Teaching and Non-Teaching Qualifications and Hiring include, but are
not limited to, the following:
10
ICT integration framework.
in teaching
What qualifications Skills for:
and competencies are
11
What are the issues Localization law
and challenges in Ranking system
hiring public school Natural vacancies
teachers, and how can Planned positions
these be addressed? Notice of Organization,
Staffing, and
Compensation Action
Political influence
Competition between
public and private
sector
Emigration and/or
foreign contractual
work
Entry levels
Qualification standards
and criteria for hiring
Allocation of teacher
items
Verification of eligibility
documents
12
capacity-building needs, and to examine various dimensions and
determinants of their professional growth. Specific questions attempt to
validate reported challenges to personnel movement and progression. Key
topics under Career Development include, but are not limited to, the
following:
13
Risk insurance
Monetization Program
Gender and Development
What motivates teaching and Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
non-teaching personnel to
sustain commitment and
passion to high-quality
teaching, learning, and work
performance?
THEME 4: GOVERNANCE
Managing the largest bureaucracy towards educating the nation’s future
requires efficient and effective operations. The Governance theme of the
Research Agenda, which covers planning, finance, program management,
transparency and accountability, and evaluation, underscores DepEd’s
commitment to ensure that its structure, systems, and processes contribute
to the achievement of basic education outcomes.
The Department has already provided internal guidance (DepEd Order 13, s.
2015) for the development of effective and efficient policies. With this in
place, DepEd’s next concern is to ensure that these policies are implemented
and translated into appropriate programs. Because it governs a very large
sector with complex interrelationships, the Department often encounters
challenges in its Planning process. This section deals with standards and
policies that ensure the achievement of the Department’s goals. Key topics
under Planning include, but are not limited to, the following:
14
education. Relevant research areas include meeting government budget,
15
accounting, and auditing requirements without compromising efficiency.
This highlights the need to closely examine the effects of financial
management not just on program managers, but also on the intended
beneficiaries. Key topics under Finance include, but are not limited to, the
following:
16
of basic education? Build-Operate- education services to
Transfer, Build-Lease- undocumented
Transfer, Build- Filipino learners
Transfer) abroad.
17
undertaking at the appropriate stages of the cycle. Key topics under
Evaluation include, but are not limited to, the following:
18
1. Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)
3. Inclusive Education
8Department Order No. 43, series of 2015 and Department Order No 4, series of
2016.
20
external stakeholders with the intention of getting the active participation of
research institutions and the academe.
Specifically, for BERF-funded research, DepEd will collect and upload the
completed research studies in the website for ready reference. Non-BERF-
funded research may also be shared with DepEd relevant offices for the
integration of results to policy and/or program development. Research
results will be considered in the development of a knowledge management
system for the Department.
The Department recognizes that basic education research is not its sole task;
hence, it is hoped that the Research Agenda can inspire and guide its
external stakeholders to undertake empirical studies to better understand
and advance basic education in the country. Academics and researchers can
find in the Agenda prospects for scholarly study and discourse. For
institution leaders and administrators, the Agenda presents trends and
issues that can provoke new insights and practical solutions upon
investigation. Importantly, the Research Agenda can orient and advise
policy-makers on matters that necessitate policy actions.
Lastly, to ensure full use of the research studies emanating from the
Research Agenda, PRD will analyse the findings to come up with
recommendations for policy and/or program development.
Overall, PRD will provide recommendations for the review of the Research
Agenda and the formulation of its next iteration. In this light, the Agenda
will be reviewed periodically against the consolidated research results, new
education trends, and emerging education issues.
The Regional Policy, Planning, and Research Divisions (PPRDs) will lead in
the local research management and monitoring the progress of the Agenda.
Annual review will be conducted to assess the progress of the Agenda. This
will be used to adjust strategies in promoting the conduct of research.
Lastly, mid- and end-term review will be done on the 3 rd and 6th year,
respectively, to determine the need for adjustment and/or the development
of a new Research Agenda, if any.
VIII. References
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting,
and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston:
Pearson.
- DepEd Order 13, s. 2015
- DepEd Order 43, s. 2015
- DepEd Order 4, s. 2016
21