Materials Manual - Oct 2014
Materials Manual - Oct 2014
Materials Manual - Oct 2014
MANUAL
1ST EDITION
OCTOBER 2014
This document has been prepared for the Roads Authority of Namibia for the exclusive use of the Roads Authority and
Consultants employed by the Roads Authority.
www.ra.org.na
Copyright
Copyright of this manual vests in the Roads Authority of Namibia and its successors in title, where relevant. In terms of the
Copyright Act, no part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, scanning or by any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing by the publisher. Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review as
permitted under the Copyright Act, as well as such copying as is necessary to comply with the requirements of this manual
are however permitted.
PREAMBLE SUMMARY OF CONTENTS
PREAMBLE
Summary of Contents
Preamble
1 Introduction
6 Materials Standards
8 Laboratory procedures
9 Control
MATERIALS MANUAL I
PREFACE PREAMBLE
Preface
The Roads Authority of Namibia is a statutory body established in terms of the Roads Authority Act, Act 17 of 1999.
Section 3 of the Act sets out the object of the Authority as follows:
“Subject to this Act and the Road Fund Administration Act, the object of the Authority is to manage the national roads
network in accordance with section 16 with a view to obtaining a safe and efficient road sector.”
It is important to understand that “efficient” includes economic and financial efficiency as well as the common
understanding of the word.
Key clauses of the Roads Authority Act that are of particular relevance to operational issues are Section 15 wherein the
Roads Authority’s functions are set out; and Section 16, which elaborates on one of these functions that being the
management of the national road network including inter alia:
These four aspects of the Roads Authority’s mandate are complex and wide ranging. In order to assist it to comply with
these obligations, the Roads Authority commissioned a suite of manuals applicable to road work and related matters. It
consists of the following interlinked units:
Procedures Manual
Economic
Construction Drainage Environmental
Evaluation
Manual Manual Manual
Manual
The Geometrics Manual is supported by the Standard Drawings and the Traffic Signs Policy.
Roads Authority personnel carrying out similar functions are also subject to the requirements of the Procedures Manual.
II MATERIALS MANUAL
PREAMBLE THE MANUALS IN GENERAL
To provide a basis for the attainment of uniformity of action of all persons carrying out design and related work for
the Roads Authority, whether these be in‐house personnel or external consultants;
To promote the attainment of uniformity between in‐house personnel and external consultants in the handling of
construction projects.
To set out the minimum standards and requirements of the Roads Authority, either directly in a specific manual or
through its linkages with the other manuals in the suite.
These manuals are to be seen as books of reference and instructions to be used in the planning, design and administration
of projects.
Both relevant in‐house personnel and all consultants are therefore expected to make themselves thoroughly familiar with
the contents of the Procedures Manual and such other manuals as may be relevant to a project, so that each project can
pass through the different stages of planning, design, tendering and construction satisfactorily and that the submission of
reports, records, drawings, documents, etc. is according to requirements.
Consultants must supply copies of relevant manuals to each designer and Engineer’s Representative employed on
construction contracts for the Roads Authority, which latter copies shall be kept at each Site Office.
Should any portion of this manual appear to be contradictory, either internally or in relation to any other manual; or
insufficiently detailed, the Project Control Engineer must be contacted for a ruling.
Constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement of any of the manuals would be appreciated and should be
addressed to:
The Chief Executive Officer, Roads Authority, Private Bag 12030, Windhoek, Namibia
Definitions
The following definitions are relevant to all manuals:
Agreement is the completed Agreement between the Roads Authority and the Consulting Engineer. Such
Agreements may have different titles, depending on the source of funding.
Chief Executive Officer is the person appointed under Section 14 of the Roads Authority Act to serve as Chief
Executive Officer of the Roads Authority.
Date of Agreement is the date on which it was signed by the last person signing.
Engineer is the Consulting Engineer appointed by the Roads Authority to prepare a project or contract
documents, or to supervise the execution of a contract.
Permanent Secretary is the official appointed to the post of Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Works and
Transport
Project Control Engineer is the official appointed by the Chief Executive Officer to coordinate the execution of a specific
project and to act as a link between the RA and the Consulting Engineer.
Roads Authority is the Roads Authority constituted in terms of the Roads Authority Act, Act 17 of 1999
CAUTION – This icon, usually accompanied by highlighted text, indicates that the user must be aware and
use caution when following certain procedures or deviating from standard design methods.
YIELD – This icon indicates that the Roads Authority must be informed of an issue. This might be a deviation
from the Terms of Reference; a deviation from design standards; or the achievement of milestones. Work
may however continue.
STOP – Unlike for the yield icon, the stop icon indicates that the Roads Authority’s written approval must be
obtained before commencing with any further design or other tasks related to the issue for which approval
is to be obtained.
NO ENTRY – This icon indicates no‐go areas for practitioners. These could be set values for certain variables,
or certain processes that may not be followed.
WORK IN PROGRESS – The “men at work” icon is used where sections can and should be extended or where
work is pending. Due to funding or time constraints these parts or sections are not yet included in the
manual.
IV MATERIALS MANUAL
PREAMBLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Full copyright in respect of the abovementioned field books, data, calculations, plans, reports and tender documents rests
with the Roads Authority. No part of these items shall be stored, copied or transmitted by any means whatsoever without
prior written agreement of the Roads Authority having been obtained. This restriction does not apply to retention of
records as may be required in law or to satisfy good engineering practice.
Acknowledgement
In preparation of this and the other manuals comprising this suite of manuals applicable to road works, considerable use,
including direct application, has been made of similar work done previously by the predecessor in title of the Roads
Authority and by other authorities, notably the manuals, directives and memoranda of the Western Cape Provincial
Administration (South Africa), the Department of Transport (South Africa) and the South African National Roads Agency Ltd
(SANRAL). These sources were used with due permission. The Roads Authority acknowledges with thanks the valuable
content from these non‐Namibian sources used in the Manuals, as well as that from Namibian sources such as the
Meteorological Services, the Ministry of Environment and Tourism and others. It goes without saying that the Roads
Authority also acknowledges with thanks all individual authors who contributed to the source documents from which
content has been taken for use in these manuals.
In respect of materials and pavements, permission to use the South African Pavement Engineering Manual (SAPEM) was
provided by SANRAL. This Manual was however not available until completion of this suite of Procedures Manuals of the
Roads Authority. The reader is nevertheless referred to this comprehensive Manual for further reading. With constant
developments towards more sophistication in testing methods ‐ including advances in computerised testing equipment –
and the introduction of new design and construction technologies in the Southern African Roads Industry, the Roads
Authority will study the implications of deviations included in the SAPEM Manual and will inform the industry in Namibia
when adjustments to this Construction Manual will become necessary.
Particularly the current revision of TMH1 into SANS 3001 standards, the introduction of SANS 4001 and the re‐writing of the
Standard COLTO Specifications (1998 edition) will have a direct impact on materials testing, planning, design and
construction in Namibia. A table which indicates the corresponding SANS 3001 standards already prepared are included in
Annexure E of this Manual. Guidelines on the application of these new standards in Namibia will be notified by the Roads
Authority in due course.
MATERIALS MANUAL V
PREAMBLE CONTENTS
Contents
Preamble .......................................................................................................................................................................... i
Summary of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... i
Preface ......................................................................................................................................................................................... ii
Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Guidelines for users of the manuals ............................................................................................................................................ iv
Copyright of work done by the Consulting Engineer ................................................................................................................... iv
Acknowledgement........................................................................................................................................................................ v
MATERIALS MANUAL IX
CONTENTS PREAMBLE
7.5 Split application, two coats seal with sand blinding................................................................................................... 7‐33
7.5.1 Description ......................................................................................................................................................... 7‐33
7.5.2 Bituminous binder .............................................................................................................................................. 7‐33
X MATERIALS MANUAL
PREAMBLE CONTENTS
MATERIALS MANUAL XI
CONTENTS PREAMBLE
Tables
Table 4‐1 : Minimum test holes for fill land selected pits ...................................................................................................... 4‐12
Table 6‐1 : Natural Base grading requirements ..................................................................................................................... 6‐23
Table 6‐2 : Salt‐gravel property guidelines ............................................................................................................................ 6‐25
Table 6‐3 : Rapid evaluation of salt‐gravel ............................................................................................................................. 6‐25
Table 6‐4 : Bitumen spray and mix temperatures .................................................................................................................. 6‐27
Table 6‐5 : Bitumen ‐ aggregate combinations ...................................................................................................................... 6‐28
Table 6‐6 : Concrete aggregate properties ............................................................................................................................ 6‐28
Table 6‐7 : Basic concrete stone requirements ...................................................................................................................... 6‐28
Table 7‐1 : Acceptable surface treatments ............................................................................................................................ 7‐31
Table 7‐2 : Bitumen conversion factors ................................................................................................................................. 7‐31
Table 7‐3 : Resealing applications: typical emulsion spray rates .......................................................................................... 7‐33
Table 7‐4 : Stone spread rate ................................................................................................................................................. 7‐34
Table 7‐5 : P‐values for 13/6mm binder application.............................................................................................................. 7‐34
Table 7‐6 : Application rates of precoating fluid .................................................................................................................... 7‐35
Table 7‐7 : "P"‐ values for CS binder application.................................................................................................................... 7‐36
Table 7‐8 : Grading for crusher sand for asphalt mix ............................................................................................................. 7‐38
Table 7‐9 : Marshall criteria for hot‐mix asphalt .................................................................................................................... 7‐40
Table 7‐10 : Standards for stablisation material .................................................................................................................... 7‐45
Table 7‐11 : Maximum water/cement ratios ......................................................................................................................... 7‐46
Table 7‐12 : Maximum size of coarse aggregate .................................................................................................................... 7‐46
Table 7‐13 : Workability of concrete mixes............................................................................................................................ 7‐47
Table 7‐14 : Relative densities ............................................................................................................................................... 7‐48
Table 7‐15 : Bitumen deviation pavement design ................................................................................................................. 7‐49
Table 8‐1 : E‐values for statistical analysis ............................................................................................................................. 8‐53
Figures
Figure 7‐1 : Stone content ...................................................................................................................................................... 7‐47
Figure 8‐1 : Typical field laboratory layout ............................................................................................................................ 8‐50
Annexures
Annexure A Saline Materials Guide
Annexure B Laboratory Staff Training Evaluation Forms
Annexure C List of Standard Forms
Annexure D Control Test References
Annexure E SANS 3001 Standards developed in South Africa
Glossary of terms
The reader is referred to Section 1100 of the COLTO Standard Specifications for definitions of the various terms used in the
Manual.
General Conditions of Contract Conditions of Contract for Construction for Building and Engineering Works Designed by
the Employer, published by FIDIC
Particular Conditions of Contract Project‐specific Conditions prepared to explain, amplify or replace clauses of the
General Conditions of Contract
Project Specifications Project‐related Specifications in which clauses of the Standard Specifications are
explained, amplified, or replaced
Standard Specifications Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Works for State Road Authorities prepared
by COLTO and published by SAICE, referred to in short as “COLTO”
Mod AASHTO Modified AASHTO test to determine Maximum Dry Density (MDD)
Abbreviations
AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transport Officials
BSM Bitumen Stabilised Material
CBR California Bearing Ratio
FIDIC Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs‐Conseils
COLTO Committee of Land Transport Officials
CS Cape Seal
DCP Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
DMI Durability Mill Index
ETB Emulsion Treated Base
EVU Equivalent Vehicle Unit
10% FACT 10% Fines Aggregate Crushing Value
G1 to G10 Granular materials classification
GCC General Conditions of Contract
GM Grading Modulus
HS Hot‐mix asphalt Cape Seal (“Koffiemoer” Seal)
MATERIALS MANUAL XV
INTRODUCTION GENERAL
Where more sophisticated or alternative test methods 1.1.6 Roads Authority Officials
should be applied or where more accurate results are The titles "Senior Materials Engineer" and "Project
necessary on a project to reduce risk, the Consultant Control Engineer" are used in this manual. Whereas the
must motivate the adoption thereof. former title refers to the Roads Authority official holding
the relevant post, the latter is the individual at the Roads
1.1.3 Special Cases and Innovative Solutions
Authority designated as Project Control Engineer for a
The setting of standards for materials must in no way be
specific project. Both these designations fall under the
seen as precluding the Consultant from adopting
Divisional Manager: Construction and Rehabilitation.
innovative approaches to the problems associated with
the provision of an adequate pavement structure, It is the responsibility of the Consultant to ascertain at
especially where suitable "conventional" materials are the project start‐up meeting which Roads Authority
scarce or expensive, or both. official is current Materials Engineer and who will be
assigned as Project Control Engineer.
Many adequate solutions can be found by careful
application of design methods to specific situations, by
UTG 10 GUIDELINES FOR THE GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF 18 APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR THE USE OF
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOCAL SAND ASPHALT
STREETS 1990. 19 GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN, MANUFACTURE
UTG 11 GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMEN RUBBER
LAND USE/TRANSPORT PLANNING 1990. ASPHALT WEARING COURSES
20 SEALING OF ACTIVE CRACKS IN THE ROAD
2.6 Other design guidelines PAVEMENTS
21 ETBs ‐ THE DESIGN AND USE OF EMULSION‐
2.6.1 Asphalt Academy (AsAc) technical TREATED BASES – 1999
guidelines 22 HOT‐MIX PAVING IN ADVERSE WEATHER
TG 1 THE USE OF MODIFIED BITUMINOUS 23 CODE OF PRACTICE ‐ LOADING BITUMEN AT THE
BINDERS IN ROAD CONSTRUCTION – NOV REFINERIES
2007 24 USER GUIDE FOR THE DESIGN OF HOT MIX
TG 2 BITUMEN STABILISED MATERIALS ‐ MAY ASPHALT
2009 25 QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE HANDLING AND
TG 3 ASPHALT REINFORCEMENT FOR ROAD TRANSPORT OF BITUMINOUS BINDERS
CONSTRUCTION 26 INTERIM GUIDELINES FOR PRIMES AND STONE
PRECOATING FLUIDS NOV 2006
2.6.2 South African Bitumen Association 27 GUIDELINE FOR THIN LAYER HOT MIX ASPHALT
(SABITA) manuals WEARING COURSES ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS –
1 CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMEN RUBBER SEALS –
MAY 2008
MAY 1990
28 BEST PRACTICE FOR THE DESIGN AND
2 BITUMINOUS BINDERS FOR ROAD
CONSTRUCTION OF SLURRY SEALS
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
29 GUIDE TO THE SAFE HANDLING OF SOLVENTS IN
3 TEST METHOD FOR BITUMEN‐RUBBER – MARCH
A BITUMINOUS PRODUCTS LABORATORY
1992
30 A GUIDE TO THE SELECTION OF BITUMINOUS
4 [WITHDRAWN]
BINDERS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION
5 GUIDELINES FOR THE MANUFACTURE AND
31 GUIDELINES FOR CALIBRATING A BINDER
CONSTRUCTION OF HOT MIX ASPHALT – MARCH
DISTRIBUTOR AND ENSURING SATISFACTORY
2008
PERFORMANCE
6 [WITHDRAWN]
32 BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR WARM MIX
7 SUPERSURF ‐ ECONOMIC WARRANTS FOR
ASPHALT
SURFACING ROADS
8 SAFE AND RESPONSIBLE HANDLING OF
BITUMINOUS PRODUCTS
9 BITUMINOUS SURFACINGS FOR TEMPORARY
DEVIATIONS
10 APPROPRIATE STANDARDS FOR BITUMINOUS
SURFACINGS
11 LABOUR ENHANCED CONSTRUCTION FOR
BITUMINOUS SURFACINGS
12 METHODS FOR LABOUR‐INTENSIVE CONSTRUC‐
TION FOR BITUMINOUS SURFACINGS
13 LAMBS ‐ THE DESIGN AND USE OF LARGE
AGGREGATE MIXES FOR BASES
14 [WITHDRAWN]
15 [WITHDRAWN]
16 [WITHDRAWN]
17 THE DESIGN AND USE OF POROUS ASPHALT
MIXES
In order to fulfil transportation needs roads must comply Soils may consist of a mixture of materials from
with functional and structural requirements: a variety of origins, with a considerable degree
of weathering and particle size distribution,
Functional: The primary purpose of a road is to called grading. Materials in which the coarser
provide the road user with a surface of portion is small and where it “floats” in the
acceptable riding quality. The degree to which otherwise fine‐graded matrix of material, are
the road fulfils this need is dependent on called soils.
traction, comfort and road safety under Gravels on the other hand are materials where
prevailing conditions. These attributes are the coarser particles comprise the dominant
generally referred to as the serviceability of the component with good strength due to particle
road. interlock, with fine‐graded material occurring
Structural: The road pavement must have between the larger particles.
adequate structural strength to carry the design
traffic on the road. Economic pavements The bearing capacity of gravels and soils depends inter
generally consist of a number of layers, including alia on inherent material strength, grading, density,
the surfacing. Material characteristics, the moisture content and resistance to deformation, which is
composition and the behaviour of the materials directly affected by cohesion or clay content. Whereas
in the composite layered structure under traffic the bearing capacity of cohesionless materials is not very
loading determine the structural capacity of the moisture‐sensitive, the opposite is true in the case of
pavement. clayey materials where wet clay acts as a lubricant which
reduces particle interlock and hence the bearing capacity.
Materials planning and pavement design in the Materials Therefore the most important properties of soils and
Manual consequently involves the effective utilisation of gravels in respect of road construction purposes, which
available natural or modified soils, gravels and rock, to can all be determined by materials testing, are the
create a combination of pavement layers able to following:
withstand the traffic loading anticipated during the
design life of the road pavement structure, while at the Compaction of the material to the specified
same time providing a reasonable riding comfort. density to comply with minimum strength
requirements must be achieved;
The clay content and related properties must be
within acceptable limits;
The individual granular particles should not Solar radiation mainly influences bituminous products,
weather significantly and must not disintegrate where oxidation and hardening of the binder affect long‐
under traffic loading. term performance of the seal or asphalt surfacing.
way during construction without an understanding of the respect of the planning and design stages. The Sections
original objectives of the designed pavement structure. hereinafter include the procedures to be followed during
these stages, under the following main headings:
3.5 Testing of materials
Materials investigation
The ability of a pavement to spread traffic‐induced loads Pavement structural design
is mainly affected by its shear modulus and stiffness Materials standards
modulus. Since granular materials in a pavement tend to Materials design
fail in shear, resistance to shear is generally regarded as
the most important parameter. In the case of cemented It must be noted that it is inevitable that some overlap
materials the load‐spreading ability of a pavement will occur in respect of the procedures that must be
depends mainly on the stiffness modulus and flexural followed during the planning, design and construction
strength of the material. These moduli could be stages, which may require cross‐referencing between the
measured using sophisticated testing equipment, but Materials and the Construction Manuals.
simpler laboratory tests are normally used to measure
other material properties from which the load‐spreading
ability can be estimated.
From the longitudinal sections select only those pits, sampling and testing will accordingly be
places where the ground profile protrudes into determined by the homogeneity of the existing
the design depth or is above the finished road pavement layers and by the condition and
level, and make trial pits at 200 m intervals with relative performance of different pavement
a minimum of two holes per section of road so sections of the road.
identified. The depth of holes is to be 1 m
below final road level. Sampling and testing shall Sampling and Testing
be carried out as described in §4.1.2 above. A sample shall be taken of each layer identified and
indicator tests as described in §4.1.2 above shall be
The procedure outlined in 4.1.2 above for deep
carried out. In addition, a minimum of one CBR test per
cuts and fills greater than 1 m high shall be
layer per km shall be carried out on samples
followed as well.
representative of each of the various material types
4.1.4 On Existing Roads encountered, or as otherwise dictated by the selected
homogenous sections in the case of full rehabilitation of
Depth of Sampling existing bitumen roads with available Materials
Where the final grade line is known, the existing Completion Data, as described above in the last bullet
pavement shall be sampled to a depth of 750 mm below point.
the proposed finished road level.
At each CBR sampling point, the in‐situ density of the
Where the final grade line is not known, the existing specific layer shall be determined. However it is not
pavement layers shall be sampled to 600 mm below the required that in‐situ densities be determined of layers
existing road level. more than 300 mm below existing road level. Layers less
than 90 mm thick need not be tested for density, and no
Spacing of Sampling Points
density test shall cover a depth greater than 150 mm.
Where the new road encroaches on existing surfaced
Where the layer encountered is significantly greater than
width and unsurfaced shoulders, the following procedure
150 mm, more than one density test will be required, e.g.
shall apply:
0 ‐ 150 mm, 150 to 300 mm.
where only one shoulder is involved, the
Density tests, where applicable and appropriate, must be
sampling locations shall be equally distributed
carried out before sampling, and the following additional
between existing surfaced width and shoulder at
procedures will apply:
200 m intervals;
where both shoulders are involved, sampling Density tests must also be carried out on lower
locations shall be spaced such that there will be layers and fills below the depths given above
two test holes per kilometre for each of the under “Depth of Sampling” where the
shoulders and for the surfaced width; compaction is suspect.
where the existing road is reconstructed to the Dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) tests must in
same cross‐section and level standards, ie the addition be carried out at intervals determined
base does not require widening or new levels, as set out above under ”Spacing of Sampling
sampling of the base shall be approximately at Points” but staggered longitudinally with the
500m intervals, mainly in the outer wheel path sampling points. The total depth of the DCP
but preferably where distress of the pavement tests is to be 800 mm below existing road level.
can be identified visually. In this case the
shoulders shall be sampled at 1 kilometre 4.1.5 Partly on Existing Road and Partly on
intervals, staggered between the two shoulders. Natural Ground
For full rehabilitation of an existing road with Where the road is to be constructed partly on an existing
Materials Completion Data available, and where road and partly on natural ground, whether
the cross‐section and road levels will change, longitudinally or transversely, a combination of the
the materials inspection on existing bitumen procedures outlined in §4.1.2, §4.1.3 and §4.1.4 above is
road pavements shall follow the guidelines to be followed.
contained in TRH12. The frequency of inspection
Any deviations from maximum spacings, number of test In certain uniform types of materials such as Kalahari
pits and tests, and the type of tests shall be cleared with sands, the Senior Materials Engineer may agree in writing
the Roads Authority as early as possible to a reduction in the minimum number of test holes
specified above.
determined by means of indicator tests as described in of the suggested process. In the case of solid rock
§4.3.3 on both the material and proposed binder; and quarries, 1 out of every 3 cores drilled shall be crushed,
CBR and indicator tests on the mixture. In compliance screened and tested as indicated hereafter.
with §4.6 hereof, sufficient testing shall be carried out to
make a confident recommendation in respect of the The hardness and durability of the aggregate and base
mechanical stabilisation solution. material in all sources proposed for use in base shall be
proved by means of the 10% FACT (Fine Aggregate
4.4.5 Chemical stabilisation Crushing Test) and/or the Durability Mill Index (Texas Ball
In cases where chemical stabilisation (cement or lime) is Mill) test. These are specified in COLTO and include wet
proposed, additional tests such as ICS, ITS, UCS or others and dry testing for durability.
as may be required shall be carried out in order to
establish the type and quantity of stabilising agent. The testing requirements in the Clauses hereafter shall in
addition be followed where stabilisation of the Base
4.4.6 Testing for salt material is necessary, and to test for deleterious salt.
Tests shall be carried out on at least 4 holes to determine
the presence of deleterious salts in all borrow material to 4.5.4 Mechanical stabilisation
be used for Subbase. The provisions of §4.4.4 will apply to Base as well.
deleterious salts are identified in a borrowpit, at least 4 appropriate for the specific project and cannot be used in
holes must be tested for salt in that borrowpit. Electrical lieu of an asphalt layer.
conductivity and pH tests are required for this purpose.
The suitability of proposed mixes shall be proved by
Recommendations on the use of materials with a high means of the Marshall design method as currently
salt content must be based on the Roads Authority’s employed by the Roads Authority. Proposed mix designs
guidelines in this regard in the Annexure to this Manual. shall be submitted to the Roads Authority for approval.
Where additional duplicate samples are required by the materials encountered in the centreline
Roads Authority, the cost to prepare and submit these, if materials survey.
any, is to be negotiated and agreed with the Roads 2 A detailed description of the materials
Authority. prospecting phase from which the borrowpit
locations were developed.
More details of the requirements are given in Section 8 3 The trial pits and other relevant information
Part 3 of this Manual. shall be shown on a map of suitable scale and
accompanied by brief descriptions of the
4.10 Recording of test results of materials materials, test results, depths etc. The locality in
investigation terms of GPS‐based co‐ordinates of all trial pits
opened and not sampled due to poor quality on
All the test results obtained as a result of the
visual inspection shall be submitted separately
investigations into centreline materials, quarries and
in the report.
borrowpits shall be recorded on the Roads Authority's
4 A statement of the proposed sources of
standard materials survey and borrowpit sheets.
materials together with their proposed usage
It is required that the data be filled in on the sheets in and including relevant details such as expected
black ink, either by typing or by computer, clearly and quantities and depths of overburden.
consistently. The data on these sheets shall form the 5 The aspect of proposed usage of materials shall
basis of the pavement design. Completed master copies be covered in addition by Mass Haul Diagrams,
shall be submitted in draft format to the Roads Authority Material Distribution Tables and Materials Haul
as part of the Materials Report. Diagrams.
6 A detail overview of the materials sampled from
4.11 Structural design and materials usage test pits opened in existing pavement layers,
including in‐situ density, DCP and laboratory test
The structural design of the road pavement (see Section results of the natural and modified materials as
5) and proposed material usage based on the data may be appropriate, to support the
recorded on the materials survey and borrowpit sheets recommended re‐use thereof in the new road
shall be finalised in consultation with the Senior pavement.
Materials Engineer. 7 Details of possible commercial sources of supply
are to be included.
4.12 Reports on materials investigation 8 Major sources of water supply.
Measures to deal with these problems must be comments received thereon from the Senior
stated. Materials Engineer;
2 The existence of deleterious minerals in all discussions during the joint materials inspection;
aggregates. If present, measures to deal with and to include the results of any additional
the problem must be proposed. testing or investigation which may be required
3 Deviations and Innovations of the Consultant.
4 Any deviation from the standards for materials
contained in this Manual which has been If no draft report is required by the Terms of Reference
approved in writing by the Senior Materials for a specific consultancy contract, only a final report will
Engineer, shall be reported on. be submitted.
5 Any suggestions for innovative approaches to
This modified version will constitute the final Materials
the solution of materials‐related problems shall
Report and three copies must be submitted to the Senior
be set out, even if such approaches have not, or
Materials Engineer at least 4 weeks before the tender
not yet, been approved in writing by the Senior
documentation is due to be finalised. The Final Materials
Materials Engineer.
Report will form part of the Design Report.
Environmental Aspects
4.12.5 Tender Materials Report
Environmental issues relating to materials shall be
A materials report for tender purposes must be prepared
reported on. Relevant information extracted from the
by the Consultant from the approved Final Materials
Environmental Impact Assessment shall be included and
Report. This version must be completely factual and
discussed. Further information in this regard can be
must therefore exclude discussions, opinions and
found in the Roads Authority's Environmental Manual.
contentious issues where these would be confusing or
Major Structures misleading or potentially so to the Contractor. Care must
Testing and investigations carried out in accordance with however be taken to ensure that all information which
the Procedures Manual for the foundations of bridges may be relevant to the Tender is disclosed for contractual
and other major structures shall be reported on. reasons.
The foundation conditions at each bridge and other A copy of the Tender Materials Report must be made
major structures, and the design philosophy proposed for available to all Tenderers.
the foundations of such structures must be given.
4.13 Inspection of quarries and borrowpits
4.12.3 Draft Materials Report
Five copies of a preliminary, or draft, materials report 4.13.1 General
covering at least the aspects detailed in 4.12.2 above, After the preliminary, or draft, materials report has been
plus the proposed pavement design, must be submitted submitted to the Senior Materials Engineer the
to the Senior Materials Engineer. The required time of Consultant must arrange with the former for a joint
submission of this draft report, which must include all inspection of borrowpits and quarries proposed for
borrowpit and soil survey sheets, drilling logs, and all construction, as well as areas along the route where
other pertinent information, in a fully completed form, specific geotechnical problems are expected to be
will vary from project to project and must be agreed encountered.
upon between the Roads Authority and the Consultant at
the project handover meeting. This inspection should be carried out at the earliest
possible date to allow time for any additional
The aim in setting this date is to allow sufficient time for investigation or testing which the Senior Materials
the Roads Authority to study the report prior to the Engineer may require to be carried out.
materials inspection.
4.13.2 Arrangements
4.12.4 Final Materials Report The Consultant must draw up a suitable programme for
The preliminary, or draft, materials report must be the inspection and submit this to the Senior Materials
modified in the light of
6 MATERIALS STANDARDS The matter must be discussed with the Senior Materials
Engineer in cases where the strength of the in situ
material in the roadbed or that of the material available
6.1 Introduction for Fill approaches the lower limit.
This section of the Materials Manual sets out the normal
requirements of the Roads Authority for the various Other Standards
materials comprising the pavement layers in the road. Standards relating to compaction and maximum stone
These materials standards presuppose that material size are summarised in COLTO Table 3402/1.
complying with the requirements can be found within
economic haul distances, if at all. Additional Compaction Requirements
In the case of road widening where new work is
Where a road is to be constructed in accordance with the constructed next to the existing road prism, differential
COLTO Standard Specifications and any standard in this settlement may occur between the old and new work
Manual differs from that specified in COLTO, then the and provision shall be made for the Fill to be compacted
standard to be applied to a specific road must be cleared to 93% Mod AASHTO density instead of the specified 90%
with the Senior Materials Engineer at tender in Table 3402/1.
documentation stage and specified in the Project
6.2.3 Standards : Selected Layers
Specifications of the Works Contract
General
The standards for selected layers in respect of
6.2 Fill, Roadbed and Selected Layer
compaction, strength (CBR), swell, Atterberg Constants
and grading shall comply with the requirements in the
6.2.1 Definitions
The reader is referred specifically to Section 1100 of COLTO Table 3402/2.
COLTO, but also subsequent Sections where appropriate,
Grading
for definitions of the various terms used in the Manual. COLTO Table 3402/1 allows an adjustment to the
specified Plasticity Index (PI) according to the Grading
6.2.2 Standards : Fill and Roadbed
Modulus (GM) of the material.
California Bearing Ratio
No material with a CBR of less than three percent (3%) at The Grading Modulus is determined as follows:
specified or in‐situ density shall be permitted within one 300 2,00 0,425 0,075
metre of the final road level, or within the Material
100
Depth, whichever is the biggest. The Material Depth is
based on Road Category must be based on the where
recommendations of TRH 4. This depth approximates the
P2,00 = % passing the 2,00 mm sieve
pavement cover necessary for a relatively poor soil of 1
P0,425 = % passing the 0,425 mm sieve
to 2% soaked CBR strength.
P0,075 = % passing the 0,075 mm sieve
Material within the material depth shall have a CBR at
Additional Compaction Requirements
least equal to the value of the design CBR, when
Refer to § 6‐2.2.3. In the case of road widening the
compacted to 90% MAASHTO density in the case of Fill
Selected layers shall be compacted to 95% Mod AASHTO
material, or when at the natural density in the case of in‐
density instead of the specified 93% in Table 3402/2 of
situ material (or 100% MAASHTO density in the case of
COLTO.
the material being a sand).
Durability requirements
The design CBR value (at the relevant density) is a
Except where mudrock is used as Selected material, there
minimum value which shall be met in not less than 90%
is no durability requirement. The requirements in COLTO
of cases, with the remaining 10% of cases CBRs of no less
Table 3402/2 shall be complied with.
than two percent (2%).
In the case of G2 and G3 Base, the crushed stone will be Where a natural pedogenic source is used for G4 Base,
derived from a source with adequate strength and the material must comply with the grading requirements
yielding insufficient fines (either due to hardness of marked ** (after compaction).
aggregate or inadequacy of the crusher set‐up) to which
a binder may be added in order to achieve the desired Where a natural source of pedogenic material for use in a
grading. G4 Base does not comply with the grading requirements
marked ** (after compaction), and the pavement design
The source may, however, also be naturally occurring justifies the use of a material at “Relaxed” standards, the
gravel which will require processing by means of crushing grading shall comply with grading in the table marked
in order to obtain a satisfactory product. It will usually be ***.
necessary to pre‐screen the material before crushing and
discarded or added back in strictly controlled quantities, % PASSING
SIEVE G4* G4** G4***
as may be relevant. For the fines to be usable in the G3 SIZE (NON‐PEDOGENIC, (PEDOGENIC, PEDOGENIC,
Base, it should be of suitable uniformity and quality, and (MM) UNCRUSHED) UNCRUSHED) UNCRUSHED)
the quantity must not be excessive. 53,0 100 100 100
37,5 85 ‐ 100 85 ‐ 100
If the available material source does not meet the criteria 26,5 ‐ 72 ‐ 95
for crushing strength, the Senior Materials Engineer shall 19,0 60 ‐ 90 60 ‐ 90
be consulted to obtain approval for the use of a reduced 13,2 ‐ 52 ‐ 83 max 95
standard where sources of better material either do not 4,75 30 ‐ 65 30 ‐ 65 max 80
exist or are uneconomic to import. The Consultant shall 2,00 20 ‐ 50 20 ‐ 50 max 65
inter alia evaluate and motivate the risk of crushing of 0,475 10 ‐ 30 10 ‐ 35 max 40
the material under traffic. 0,075 5 ‐ 15 5 ‐ 15 max 20
* COLTO Standard Specifications; ** RA Specifications for Pedogenic
Materials; *** RA Relaxed Standard
Deleterious Minerals Table 6‐1 : Natural Base grading requirements
Sulphide Minerals: Crushed rock containing sulphide
minerals shall be investigated for deleterious effects. In all cases where the use of a Relaxed standard G4
pedogenic Base is proposed, for whatever reason, the
Mica: Base material containing easily visible mica,
matter must first be discussed with the Materials
especially in the form of muscovite, should be
Engineer and his approval obtained. Permission to use
investigated for compaction problems before use and, if
such material will normally only be granted where traffic
possible, should be avoided.
is very low, and sources of better material either do not
Soluble Salts: The occurrence of soluble salts in the exist or are uneconomic to import.
material shall be governed by the electrical conductivity
of the material, which shall not exceed 0,15 Sm‐1 Atterberg constants
The Maximum Plasticity Index for the RA Relaxed
If this limit is exceeded, then special measures must be standard for pedogenic materials is 10 (refer to previous
adopted consistent with the requirements of COLTO sub‐clause).
clause 3602, and the Materials Engineer must be
consulted in this regard. Deleterious Minerals
The provisions of §6.5.2 on Deleterious Minerals will
apply.
6.5.2 Untreated Natural Base (G4 Type)
Durability
Grading
A G4 Base material shall comply with the durability
Two additional grading standards of the Roads Authority
requirements of COLTO Table 3402/3, ie the Durability
are included in the table below in respect of uncrushed
Mill Index (DMI).
pedogenic Base material, marked ** and ***. The latter
is called the “Relaxed” grading specification.
Ethylene Glycol soak tests may be necessary where Basic stabilisation shall be as for G4 pedogenic (relaxed
Crystalline rock occur in the base material, generally in standard) and G4 (non‐pedogenic) respectively given in
combination with wet and dry 10% FACT tests. Table 6‐1. Where material from Basic Crystalline rock is
used, the plasticity in the material must be reduced to
In the case of calcrete the minimum Dry 10% FACT shall non‐plastic using lime stabilisation/modification.
be 80*.
Material for stabilisation as Base material must comply
* If this lower strength requirement is motivated and the requirements set out in Table 7‐10 of this manual.
acceptable to the Roads Authority for a specific road Accelerated wet/dry carbonation tests will be required to
project, then the requirements in the COLTO Standard indicate the risk of carbonation. All other requirements
Specification will have to be adjusted accordingly in the are generally as for non‐treated material as set out in §
Project Specifications. 6.5.2.
fixed grading envelope can be given as essential for good Fresh gravels after laboratory processing and mixing with
performance. brine should meet the criteria in the table below:
The wearing course shall preferably be continuously QUALITY INDICATOR SPECIFIED LIMIT
graded so that it compacts to a hard, dense surface Gravel Quality:
which will not pothole or corrugate excessively under the Plasticity Index Min 4% if soluble salt >2.0%
normal climatic conditions in the particular area. Min 10% if soluble salt <2,0%
% passing 0,075 mm sieve min 15%
The maximum size of the material after compaction shall Soluble Salt Content %
wherever possible not exceed 37,5 mm. In gravel Min 1,5%
In brine:
The wearing course material shall consist of natural For top 50 mm Min 18%
gravel and shall, after the processing and/or mechanical For lower 100 mm Min 8%
stabilisation thereof, comply with the recommendations Gypsum Content Min 10%
Grading and Compaction:
of Table 1 in Draft TRH 20.
Maximum size 26,5 mm
For the calculation of the grading coefficient and the GM 1.0 to 2.2 (Ideal below 1.5)
shrinkage product the results of the grading analysis, Density minimum: 93% Mod AASHTO
aim : 95% Mod AASHTO
calculated as a percentage of the component passing
Table 6‐2 : Salt‐gravel property guidelines
the 37,5 mm sieve shall be used.
Rapid evaluation of road samples may be carried out on
The CBR shall be determined in accordance with Method
site to predict performance or possible maintenance
A8 of TMH1 subject to the following amendment:
problems. Two elementary tests are carried out on the
the CBR‐value shall be determined on ‐37,5 mm fines of the sampled material as follows :
material only, and
Determine the resistance value (R) by means of
any material coarser than 37,5 mm shall be
a conductivity meter
excluded from the test.
Knead a handful of wetted fines and attempt to
6.6.4 Compaction roll a thread of this material. Record the ease
The material shall be compacted in a moist condition to with which this is possible. If a thread can be
at least 95% of Mod AASHTO density. rolled easily it is a sign of plasticity so record a
“+” sign. If it is not possible to roll thread at all
6.6.5 Guidelines for a Salt-Gravel Wearing record a “‐” sign. If some doubt exists record
Course “0”.
The following guidelines based on practical experience
should prove of assistance when considering salt‐gravel The recorded R values and PI indications for each sample
roads. gives a preliminary assessment of what to expect of the
wearing course, by reference to Table 6‐3 below:
The most important material properties to ensure a
stable riding surface seem to be the soluble salt content R VALUE PI EXPECTED PERFORMANCE
and plasticity or a combination of the two. Gypsum is ‐ 30 + Excellent. May be slippery when misty.
certainly not detrimental but its role is not predictable.
‐ 30 0 Very good. Expect some stripping.
Bearing in mind that brine is normally used as the
‐ 30 ‐ Reasonable. Large aggregate will strip.
compaction water, it follows that any testing of fresh
gravels from borrowpits should first be laboratory + 30 + Good.
compacted at optimum using brine from the nearest
source. This of course is not necessary when testing road + 30 0 Mediocre if fine. Poor if coarse.
samples. Poor. Expect severe corrugations and
+ 30 ‐
rutting
Table 6‐3 : Rapid evaluation of salt‐gravel
Enrichment emulsions:
MSP3 Inverted bitumen emulsion Colas Notes 65°C
Table 6‐4 : Bitumen spray and mix temperatures
sieve
Cationic bitumen emulsion nominal size of stone (mm)
Spray Yes Yes 75,0 53,0 37,5 26,5 19,0 13,2 9,5 6,7
Premix Yes Yes
75,0 100 100
Stable Yes No
Anionic bitumen emulsion 85‐
Spray No Yes** 53,0 0‐50 100
100
Premix No Yes** 85‐
Stable Yes Yes 37,5 0‐25 0‐50 100
100
* For sand surface dressing specifications MC 3000 cutback may
85‐
be used with silica sands 26,5 0‐5 0‐25 0‐50 100
** For practical considerations, cationic spray and premium 100
emulsions are used instead of anionic emulsions. 85‐
19,0 0‐5 0‐25 0‐50 100
Table 6‐5 : Bitumen ‐ aggregate combinations 100
85‐
13,2 0‐5 0‐25 0‐50 100
100
85‐
6.9 Aggregates for Concrete 9,5 0‐5 0‐25 0‐50
100
100
85‐
6,7 0‐5 0‐25 0‐50
6.9.1 Fine and Coarse Aggregate 100
The fine aggregate shall consist of natural sand or crusher 4,75 0‐10 0‐10 0‐10
dust and shall comply with the requirements of section
DUST CONTENT (0,075mm) ‐ MAX 1,5
3.2.1 of SANS 1083. Those requirements are given below
in Table 6‐6. AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE ‐ MAX 29
10% FACT (‐13,2 +9,5mm fraction, dry)
SAND DERIVED SAND DERIVED Stone subject to surface abrasion 110
FROM NATURAL FROM CRUSHING
Stone not subject to surface abrasion 70
DISINTEGRATION OR MILLING OF
OF ROCK ROCK Table 6‐7 : Basic concrete stone requirements
Grading: % of material
passing the following sieves (mm)
4,750 90 ‐ 100 90 ‐ 100 In addition the drying‐shrinkage characteristics in
0,150 0 ‐ 15 0 ‐ 20 accordance with SANS Method 836 of both aggregates
Dust content shall be such that:
5 10
(<0,075 mm) max
Fineness Modulus 1,6 ‐ 3,5 concrete for prestressed concrete and slender
Chloride content elements shall not exceed 130% of the shrinkage
Sand for concrete for prestressing: 0,01
expressed as
Sand for other classes of concrete: 0,03 of the reference aggregate;
Cl % (m/m) max
The colour of the liquid above the sand for other reinforced concrete the shrinkage of
shall not be darker than the colour of the the fine aggregate shall not exceed 175%, and
Organic Impurities reference solution, except if the sand
complies with the requirements for
for the coarse aggregate not 150%, of the
soluble deleterious impurities. shrinkage of the reference aggregate;
To be free from sugar unless the sand for mass and unreinforced concrete the
Presence of sugar complies with the requirement for
soluble deleterious impurities. shrinkage of both aggregates shall not exceed
The strength of the mortar made with the 200% of that of the reference aggregate;
Soluble deleterious sand shall not be less than 85% of that of concrete made with these aggregates shall
impurities mortar made with the same sand after it
has been washed. exhibit shrinkage less than 0.04% (SANS Method
Table 6‐6 : Concrete aggregate properties 1085);
The coarse aggregate shall consist of clean crushed or The flakiness Index shall not exceed 35 (TMH1 Method
processed rock or clean natural gravel, suitably screened. B3), aggregates shall not contain any deleterious
amounts of organic materials such as grass and timber,
6.9.2 Cement
The cement used shall comply with following
specifications.
The purpose of this section of the Manual is to provide 7.2.1 Type of Surfacing
some practical, basic background for use during materials Dense graded premix (continuous or gap graded) would
design and tender documentation by personnel who may normally only be considered in the following
at times be out of contact with their technical support circumstances :
structures. It is not intended to be a definitive exposition
on the subjects touched upon, nor a substitute for proper on major works where initial traffic exceeds 400
design and sound engineering judgement related to the heavy vehicles in both directions per day i.e. an
specific circumstances. AADT of about 4000 EVU's;
in urban areas for practical reasons related to
Aspects that are covered in the COLTO Standard surfacing between kerbs and channels, for
Specifications and in the Construction Manual are not minimising disruption to traffic or to resist
repeated. horizontal shear forces at roundabouts or
approaches to robot controlled intersections of
Although some guidance is provided under this Section in
main arterials; or
respect of bitumen and stone application rates, these
in rehabilitation projects, in order to provide a
must be considered only as basic guidelines, for example
levelling course or additional strength.
for planning and budget purposes. All final seal designs
must however be carried out in accordance with the The choice of a surface treatment, on the other hand, is
guidelines of TRH 3. The reason for this is that there are influenced by the following factors :
just too many variables to allow for from the texture,
fattiness and porosity of the surface to be sealed, traffic;
embedment to allow for in the design, temperature, the climate;
ALD, flakiness, porosity and application rate of the stone, turning actions;
to the more important traffic and heavy component gradient;
thereof, amount of construction traffic, steep grades with cost;
slow speeds or areas with severe deceleration, etc. logistics.
Spread rates must generally be such that a shoulder‐to‐ However, there are other considerations affecting the
shoulder aggregate layer with no double chipping is seal type to be adopted, and the matter must be
achieved. In certain cases the stone application may be discussed with the Senior Materials Engineer before the
opened up slightly to allow adequate space for choice is finalised.
subsequent stone or seal layer(s), if considered necessary
by the designer. Bitumen spray rate guidelines given in
The following table, which is based on traffic and climatic
this Section are based on cold penetration grade bitumen
considerations, serves as a starting point for the selection
and need to be adjusted when other types of bitumen
of a surface treatment.
are specified. Gross spray rates must always be adjusted
in accordance with actual materials and road conditions.
INITIAL ADT ‐ EVUs other factors such as breaking and turning actions,
> 1 000 400 ‐ 1 000 200 ‐ 4 00 gradient, cost and logistics. The guidelines provided in
Approximate annual rainfall: <450mm
TRH3 must be consulted, but costs such as in the
19mm CS 19mm CS 13 + 7mm
following examples must inter alia be considered:
19mm HS 19mm HS 13mm CS
19 + 9/6mm 13 + 6mm 13mm + S A 19 mm CS would normally be cheaper than a
13 + 6mm 13mm CS 9mm + S* 19 mm HS in Central and possibly Southern
SSD Namibia, but in Northern Namibia, the 19 mm
Approximate annual rainfall: <450mm
HS is generally cheaper and in addition more
19mm CS 13 + 6mm 13mm CS
labour‐intensive, but environmentally less
13mm + S
friendly.
9mm + S
From a practical perspective, emulsions should
6mm
generally be avoided on steep grades (6 – 8%),
SSD
Key to table and allowance may have to be made for
19/13 mm CS Cape seal consisting of single or split application construction and opening to traffic of seals in
19.0 or 13.2mm single coat followed by 2 layers
both winter and summer time (where adhesion
of slurry.
19 mm HS As above, except that the two layers of slurry are and bleeding problems are likely).
replaced by a single layer of fine‐graded hot mix
asphalt. Alternative rates should generally be requested in
13 + 6 mm Split application with two bitumen coats using
13.2 mm aggregate followed by 6.7 mm tenders for specific situations. Long‐term economic
aggregate. considerations will of course play a dominant role in the
19 + 9/6 mm Split application with two bitumen coats using
19.2 mm aggregate followed by 9.5 or 6.7 mm final selection process.
aggregate.
13 or 9 mm Split application with a single coat of bitumen 7.2.2 Volatiles and Thermal Expansion Factors
+S using 13.2 mm or 9.5 mm aggregate followed by
a crusher or natural sand blinding*.
The binders given in this Manual have the approximate
* As above except that the sand should be of such volatile contents (according to the relevant SANS
quality as to permit it to be spread before the specifications) and thermal expansions indicated in Table
emulsion has broken.
6 mm Single application, single bitumen coat, using 6.7 7‐2:
mm aggregate.
SSD Sand surface dressing. THERMAL CONVERSION
Table 7‐1 : Acceptable surface treatments BINDER VOLATILES
EXPANSION FACTOR
Pen grade
1,000 1,086 1,09
In the case of the 19mm + 9mm; 19mm + 6mm; 13 mm + bitumen
6 mm; 13 mm + S; 9 mm + S and 6 mm “open” seals, a MC 30 cutback
1,111 1,079 1,20
bitumen
cover or fog spray consisting of equal parts of emulsion
Anionic 60%
and water may have to be included to ensure stone 1,667 1,011 1,69
emulsion
retention. To determine the spray rate required for the Cationic 65%
1,57
tack and penetration sprays (at the preferred fog spray emulsion
S‐E1 polymer
rate of 1,0 ℓ/m² diluted emulsion), 0,5 ℓ/m² of undiluted 1,08
modified
emulsion must be deducted from the total calculated S‐E2 polymer
1,06
spray rate. modified
Bitumen‐
1,07
Penetration grade bitumen or bitumen emulsion binders rubber
could be replaced by homogenous modified binders or Table 7‐2 : Bitumen conversion factors
non‐homogenous binders as appropriate. For resealing
The conversion factor (f) is used to convert cold nett
an enrichment spray such as MSP 3 or diluted emulsion
spray rates to hot gross spray rates. Binders from
could also be considered. The reseal can be applied only
different sources have different temperature conversion
after all volatiles in the enrichment spray have
factors and the user is referred to the manufacturer to
evaporated.
confirm the correct factor for a specific bitumen.
The choice between the various acceptable surface
treatment types given in the table above will depend on
7.3 Sand seal 7.4 Single application, single coat seal using
6mm aggregate
7.3.1 Description
This specification consists of a spray of binder followed 7.4.1 Description
by the application of a coarse, clean sand. It is a This specification consists of a spray of emulsion covered
surfacing specification normally used for new with 6 mm aggregate. It is commonly used for resealing
construction but can also be used for resealing or for existing surfaced roads. It is occasionally also used for
temporary by‐passes. Usually two layers are specified for surfacing very lightly trafficked roads and for temporary
new construction, but good durability can be expected by‐passes.
from one layer. The second layer can always be applied
at a later stage when this is found to be necessary ‐ this 7.4.2 Bituminous binder
could be several years later. The binder will normally consist of a spray grade
emulsion, either cationic 65% or anionic 60%, complying
7.3.2 Bituminous binder with SANS 548 or SANS 309 respectively. Cationic
The binder will normally be MC 3000 cutback bitumen or emulsion should be used with aggregates with a high
cationic 65% spray grade emulsion, complying with SANS silica content because of its better adhesion properties.
308 or SANS 548 respectively, although penetration Under favourable conditions the use of anionic emulsion,
grade bitumens have also been used effectively. MC 3000 in conjunction with basic aggregate types such as
is normally preferred on account of cost and also its dolerite, could well be advantageous.
resistance to flow on steep grades and superelevations.
On the other hand, consideration should be given to the Modified binders have been used successfully where
use of emulsion as this would result in a reduction in higher temperatures occur or where more flexibility in
petroleum volatiles. Cationic emulsion is to be used with the completed seal is required. Penetration grade
aggregates with high silica content because of its better bitumen could be used successfully with precoated
adhesion properties, but precoating could also be aggregate. All modified binders require precoating of the
considered. aggregate. The procedures hereinafter refer only to
emulsion as binder, but could also be applied to other
7.3.3 Aggregate binders as appropriate.
This has been described in Section 6.7.
7.4.3 Aggregate
7.3.4 Application rates The aggregate must comply with the requirements for 6
Hot spray rates for the binder will typically be the mm stone set out in Section 6.7 hereof.
following :
7.4.4 Application Rates
MC 3000 cutback bitumen 1,20 ℓ/m² The ALD of 6 mm aggregate does not normally exceed 3,5
Cationic 65% spray 1,60 ℓ/m² mm. If it does, an increased spray rate must be used.
Pen Bitumen and precoated sand 0,80 ℓ/m² Spray rates must be designed in accordance with TRH 3.
Typical spray rates for two categories of ALD and for
various applications of this seal type are given below:
Note: The design of all seals shall follow the guidelines
provided in TRH3. The lateral overlap between
distributor nozzle and bar sprays must be determined in
accordance with calibrated spray bar settings and nozzle
distribution.
160
150 Sufficient time must elapse prior to applying the second
140
spray to ensure that volatiles contained in the binder
130
120 used for the first spray have escaped and are not trapped
110 by the second spray as this could result in richness or
100 bleeding of the surfacing.
90
80 Precoated stone must be used where penetration grade
70 bitumen or modified bitumen is used as binder.
60
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7.6.3 Aggregate
ALD OF STONE (mm) The aggregate must comply with the requirements for 13
and 6 mm stone set out in Section 6.7 of this Manual.
Table 7‐4 : Stone spread rate
7.6.4 Spray Rates
The seal design shall follow the recommendations of TRH
7.6 13/6mm Double Seal 3, but the following method could be used for a quick
estimate of the bitumen spray rate required:
7.6.1 Description
This type of seal consists of a spray of binder, followed by Total Application
13mm aggregate spread in a single layer shoulder‐to‐ As an indication, the total nett cold rate must be:
shoulder; then a second spray of binder covered with 6
mm aggregate generally followed by a fogspray of diluted 13 6
emulsion. It is primarily used for new construction and
sometimes for resealing where warranted by higher Where the ALDs are expressed in millimetres and “P” is
traffic and risk of bleeding when compared to a Cape selected from Table 7‐5 below:
Seal.
HEAVY VEHICLES PER DAY
(IN BOTH DIRECTIONS) P
7.6.2 Bituminous binder
Up to 200 0,17
Usually, the binder for this specification consists of two
sprays of either cationic 65% or anionic 60% spray grade Above 200 0,15
emulsion complying with SANS 548 or 309 respectively Table 7‐5 : P‐values for 13/6mm binder application
and a fogspray of diluted emulsion. Cationic emulsion is Adjustment for a fog spray and ALD must be made in
to be used with aggregates with a high silica content accordance with the following paragraphs:
because of its better adhesion properties. Under
favourable weather conditions the use of anionic Adjustment for fog spray
emulsion in conjunction with basic aggregate types such The spray rate obtained using the above formula includes
as dolerite, could well be advantageous. the bitumen content in the fog spray to follow. To allow
for that, 0,33 ℓ/m² nett bitumen is to be deducted for the
However, the use of other binders may be considered fog spray when cationic emulsion is used and 0,30 ℓ/m²
such as penetration grade or modified bitumen in the when anionic emulsion is used (i.e. 0,5 ℓ/m² emulsion is
tack coat and penetration grade bitumen in the second deducted). The remainder is then split into two equal
or penetration coat. applications for the tack and penetration sprays. To
convert these sprays from cold nett to hot gross emulsion
The minimum hot gross spray rates which must be
the applicable volatile/thermal expansion factor is to be
achieved to ensure good adhesion and coverage are :
selected from Table 7‐2 in this Manual.
First spray 0,65 ℓ/m²
The resultant sprays must then be rounded off to the Typical application rates of the precoating fluid are
nearest 0,01 ℓ/m². included in Table 7‐6 below:
Adjustment of spray rates Stone size (mm) 19,0 13,2 9,5 6,7
Spray rates must be adjusted for significant changes in
ALD. This adjustment should not be based on the test Application Rate (ℓ/m²) 10‐15 11‐16 12‐17 12‐18
results of a single sample. Table 7‐6 : Application rates of precoating fluid
The spread rate of the 6 mm stone will normally be found The 9 or 6mm aggregate is to be spread in a single layer.
to be in the range of 180 ‐ 200 m²/m³. It is essential that the aggregate is not over‐applied.
7.8.2 Bituminous Binder durable surface is the one containing the most
Any one or a combination of the binders listed below bituminous binder, the aim is to spray as much binder as
may be used, subject to compatibility with the aggregate possible without producing a bleeding surface. For this
(and water) to be used. Economics as well as the type of reason the spray rate in the calculation below is varied
aggregate to be used must always be considered. A according to the number of heavy vehicles making use of
further consideration is the minimum spray application the road in both directions per day. Heavy vehicles are
required for good transverse distribution which in the defined for this purpose as trucks and trailers of 3 ton
case of a 13 mm aggregate specification virtually always carrying capacity and over. Passenger cars, caravans and
necessitates the use of an emulsion in the penetration vans are to be disregarded in arriving at the number of
spray, or even in both sprays: heavy vehicles.
Penetration grade – 80/100; 150/200 The number of heavy vehicles upon which the spray rate
MC 3000 cutback bitumen below is to be determined is to be decided upon in
Modified bitumen (mostly tack only): conjunction with the Senior Materials Engineer.
o Polymer hot : S‐E1 or S‐E2
o Polymer cold : SC‐E1 or SC‐E2
The final spray rate will be based on the
o Rubber : S‐R1
recommendations of TRH3, but the calculation method
Anionic (60%) emulsion below must also be considered.
Cationic (65%) emulsion
Total Spray
Only the stable grade version of both emulsions can be The total cold nett binder application rate in terms of
used in the manufacturing of slurry. ℓ/m² is obtained by multiplying the Spray Factor “P”
obtained from the table below by the ALD value of the
7.8.3 Aggregate
aggregate in millimetres:
All aggregate must comply with the requirements for
crusher fines, 19 and 13mm stone set out in Section 6.7 / "P"
of this Manual. Unless otherwise specified by the Roads
Authority, a Medium Grade Fine slurry shall be used to HEAVY VEHICLES PER DAY
manufacture slurry for a Cape Seal. (BOTH DIRECTIONS) SPRAY FACTOR “P”
Up to 50 0,145
7.8.4 Spray rates 51 ‐ 100 0,140
101 ‐ 150 0,135
General
151 ‐ 200 0,130
The spray rates are determined mainly by traffic, but also
stone characteristics, climate, season and traffic speed 201 ‐ 250 0,125
However, in no case may the spray reduction exceed a Penetration spray : Shall consist of a mixture of
total of 10%. equal parts of emulsion and water applied at a
rate of 1,0 ℓ/m² (See notes below).
The impact of heavy construction traffic must be
evaluated by considering the ratio of construction to NOTES:
design traffic, the prevailing ambient temperature and
the age of the seal when subjected to the effects of 1 For compatibility and dilution of emulsion refer
construction traffic. to Sections 6.8.2 and 7.2.1 respectively.
2 Stable mix grade emulsion for use in the slurry
As a guideline, a reduction in the case of construction seal can also be used for the cover spray. If
traffic will only be warranted where the total of heavy available this may be the most feasible.
construction traffic and normal heavy traffic, at the time, 3 Where emulsion is used for the tack coat, it is
exceeds the design traffic of the next or any higher possible that the calculated spray rate will
category within the first 3 weeks of the completion of the exceed the maximum permissible spray rate of
surfacing. 1,75 ℓ/m² (1.5 ℓ/m² for emulsion) if the
penetration spray remains at 1,0 ℓ/m² using 1
Increase in Spray Rates part emulsion to 1 part water, but such a
Where for any reason the prime coat has been omitted in situation should rather be avoided. If no other
the case of a new seal, the cold nett binder of the first option exists, the tack coat shall be limited to
spray only shall be increased by 0,15 ℓ/m². 1,75 ℓ/m² (1.5 ℓ/m² for emulsion) and the rest
of the binder shall be sprayed in the penetration
Unless approval has been obtained from the Senior
coat in the ratio 2 parts emulsion to 1 part
materials Engineer to the contrary, prime will always be
water.
applied to the Base layer.
4 Modified bitumen must only be used in the tack
coat and will require higher spray rates than will
Application Limits penetration bitumen (refer to TRH3).
For the tack coat the permissible maximum hot gross
spray rate to avoid run‐off of the binder, especially on Where, in exceptional cases, diluted emulsion cannot be
steep grades or high superelevations, is 1,75 ℓ/m², but a used for the penetration spray, undiluted emulsion may
lower application of around 1.50 ℓ/m² will be the be used provided prior authority is obtained from the
maximum in the case of an emulsion. Senior Materials Engineer.
Tack Coat : Shall consist of hot binder (i.e. 7.8.6 Slurry mixture
bitumen) or emulsion. Hot binder is preferred The nett bitumen content of the stable grade emulsion
as this will normally be the most economical. (60%) in the slurry mix shall be determined by a Marshall
Where modified bitumen is used for the tack mix design, or thin slurry briquettes prepared and
coat the minimum spray rate will be related to compacted at comparative road temperatures to
the type of product selected. evaluate the bitumen content where bleeding is likely to
occur.
Nett bitumen contents generally between 8% and 10% by Fine aggregate for the hot‐mix seal must comply with the
mass, but up to 12%, will likely produce the best results requirements set out in Table 7‐8.
for slurry aggregate from rock with a specific gravity
around 2600 kg/m3, which ratio must be reduced PERCENTAGE PASSING
SIEVE SIZE SIEVE BY MASS (%)
proportionally for heavier rock irrespective of traffic
4,75 100
density. Only in exceptional circumstances must
2,36 80 ‐ 100
consideration be given to a reduction in the emulsion
1,18 50 ‐ 80
content.
0,600 25 ‐ 65
Weigh batching rather than volume batching should be 0,300 15 ‐ 48
used when the moisture content in the crusher fines 0,150 7 ‐ 30
cannot be controlled or determined accurately for each 0,075 2‐7
mix operation. Table 7‐8 : Grading for crusher sand for asphalt mix
In the case of siliceous aggregates such as quartzite, Stability/flow ratio 2,0 ‐ 3,5 2,0 min
granite etc, which show poor adhesion with bitumen, 1,5 % Voids filled with bitumen 70 ‐ 80 70 ‐ 80
parts by mass of lime or limestone dust per 100 parts of % Voids in the mix at 100%
3‐5 2‐8
aggregate must be added to promote adhesion. of 75 blow marshall density
Immersion index (minimum) 75% 75%
No other adhesive agent may be added without prior
Filler/bitumen ratio ‐ 1,0 ‐ 1,5
approval by the Senior Materials Engineer.
Table 7‐9 : Marshall criteria for hot‐mix asphalt
548 respectively. The type of binder to be used will asphalt in one or more layers, and finishing with a single
depend on its compatibility with the crusher dust used in layer over the entire deck surface.
the mix.
In general, layers of asphalt should after compaction be
The tack coat shall consist of a mixture of 2 parts stable not less than 20 mm nor more than 50 mm in thickness.
grade emulsion and 1 part water.
7.12 Asphalt mixtures for sidewalks
7.11.3 Aggregate for Open-Graded Asphalt and
Slurry Seal 7.12.1 Description
The stone shall comply with the requirements set out in The asphalt carpet for sidewalks will be a dense‐graded
Table 6‐7 of this Manual. Fine aggregate for slurry shall or continuous‐graded hot asphalt of nominal thickness of
comply with the requirements set out in Section 6.7.3. 20 mm.
Nominal 19mm chips 15 % Where facilities for a hot mix are not available, a stable
Nominal 13mm chips 50 % grade anionic or cationic emulsion conforming to SANS
Nominal 6mm chips 20 %
309 or SANS 548 respectively should be used. The choice
Crusher dust 15 %
100 % between these two binders will be governed by the
compatibility of the binder with the aggregate used in the
The nett bitumen content shall be between 4,5 and 5,5% mix.
by mass of the dry aggregate. The most effective
7.12.3 Aggregate
proportions are to be established by making up
The stone must comply with the requirements set out in
laboratory trial mixes.
Table 6‐7 of this Manual. The crusher dust must comply
7.11.5 Composition of the slurry seal with the requirements set out in Section 6.7.2.
Slurry seal shall comply with the requirements of Section
7.12.4 Composition of the Asphalt
7.8.6 of this Manual.
The asphalt shall be composed of 6 mm stone chips and
7.11.6 Application rates crusher dust mixed in equal parts by mass, plus binder at
a nett bitumen content of 6% by mass of the dry
Tack coat aggregate.
An emulsion tack coat shall be applied at a diluted
emulsion rate of 0,6 ℓ/m², and construction of the 7.13 Asphalt for Patching Bituminous Surfaces
asphalt is to proceed after it has broken.
7.13.1 Description
Slurry seal An asphalt design suitable for use in patching bituminous
This is to be applied at a rate of approximately 7 kg of
surfaces is given hereunder.
fine aggregate/m² as soon as possible after the open‐
graded asphalt has been placed and compacted. 7.13.2 Bituminous Binder
The binder may be any one of the following :
Layer thicknesses
Bridge decks may be found to have been constructed out Cationic stable grade emulsion (SANS 548)
of tolerance insofar as levels are concerned. This will Anionic stable grade emulsion (SANS 309)
necessitate asphalt carpets to be laid at variable
thicknesses. The binder chosen must be compatible with the
aggregates used in the mix, with the fine aggregate the
In order to avoid differential compaction, slacks in the more important of the two aggregate components.
deck must be taken out first by laying and compacting
7.14.3 Objectives of Stabilisation For reasons of economy, raw materials for stabilisation
Apart from instances where it is desirable to stabilise the shall comply with the specifications for at least a G6
Roadbed or Fill in order to expedite construction material (CBR > 25) unless otherwise authorised in
progress, the objectives of stabilisation of pavement writing by the Senior Materials Engineer.
layers are :
Reduction of construction costs by improving Since cementation is required to meet the strength
the properties of substandard, readily available objective, tests shall be performed on cured material.
material where such stabilisation is a cheaper The stabiliser will generally be a cement product,
alternative than the procurement of materials although it should be borne in mind that cementation
may, as described above, be achieved by the addition of contents, e.g. 1, 2 and 3%. The reason for this is the low
lime. However, since the development of tensile Relative Density of Lime which may result in an excessive
strength with respect to time of lime‐soil mixtures volume of lime if 4% by mass were to be used. The
remains somewhat indeterminate, preference is given to laboratory design UCS and ITS values at 7 days and 100%
cement. Mod AASHTO density, as well as 97% Mod AASHTO
density, must be as in Table 7‐10. Accelerated 24‐hour
Design Procedure tests could be carried out at 70 to 75°C, and the results
The objective is to determine the correct content of the calibrated with 28‐day results, to estimate 28‐day results.
appropriate stabiliser for use during construction. Since
it is well‐known that materials react differently to the The maximum UCS value is a guide only and may have to
addition of various types of lime (calcium‐, magnesium ‐ be exceeded where compliance therewith would result in
or dolomitic type) all the options should be investigated impractically low stabiliser content, or where the
in order to optimise costs. requirements for ICS are not met.
Should there be any doubt as to the uniformity of the When the hydration of the stabiliser is likely to start
material from a particular source, then tests should be within the allowed mixing time, the effect thereof must
carried out on at least 3 representative samples from the be determined and allowed for, relative to the likely
source and the mean of the data obtained from these prevailing air temperatures during construction. Mixing
tests should be used for the design. time should generally be limited to 6 hours. The stabiliser
content yielding satisfactory strength of the mixture after
It should be noted that, where lime stabilisation is mixing and compaction is the content specified.
proposed, all types of road lime which are readily and
economically available shall be included in the For material from the basic crystalline rock types, also
investigation to find a suitable mix proportion complying Ethylene Glycol soak tests will be required, for visual
with minimum strength requirements. inspection and in combination with the specified
durability tests in COLTO.
Soil‐stabiliser mixtures should be prepared as described
in paragraph 3.1.1 of Method A9 of TMH 1 and then For durability, accelerated carbonation tests must be
tested in the normal manner as for uncured material. carried out, including the “brush test” in 12 wet/dry
The stabiliser content expressed as a proportion by mass cycles as specified in TMH1, in addition to the tests
of material at specified density yielding satisfactory specified in COLTO. The percentage loss in material under
improvement1 thereof is the content to be specified, the wet/dry brush test, as well as the minimum and
provided it is not less than the following amounts which maximum UCS and the minimum ITS values for the
are considered to be practical minima: different classes of chemical stabilised material shall be
in accordance with the requirements of Table 7‐10.
Lime: 1,0% (by mass) Where test results are not consistent, compliance with
Cement: 2,0% (by mass)
the specified ITS values shall govern.
The development of tensile (cohesive) strength is gauged
by means of the cured Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) and Stabilisation will likely become uneconomical at stabiliser
the Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) as described contents exceeding 3,5 to 4%.
in Methods A16T and A14 respectively of TMH1. As
stated in the method given for the determination of
optimum moisture content and maximum dry density of
stabilised material, when cement is used only one
maximum density test with 4% cement by mass need be
carried out. However, when lime is used a slightly
different procedure should be followed, i.e. moisture
density tests should be carried out at varying stabiliser
1
In the case of cementation where stabilisation is required mainly to
improve strength, the stabiliser content must also comply with the
requirements of the Initial Consumption of Stabiliser (ICS) test.
The larger the maximum size of stone, the lower the 25 25 0,59
water requirement of the mix. 30 30 0,52
35 35 0,47
If the sand is coarse, less stone can be accommodated
and conversely, with a fine sand of low fineness modulus 40 40 0,43
more stone will be needed. 45 45 0,40
Table 7‐11 : Maximum water/cement ratios
A bigger quantity of stone can be used where a lower
workability of the concrete mix is required.
Water content
The amount of water required per unit volume The amount of water required to produce concrete of the
of concrete for a given consistency and given desired workability with the aggregates to be used, is to
aggregates is substantially constant regardless be estimated. This may be done by visual examination or
of the cement content, w/c ratio or the relative from previous experience of the aggregates concerned.
proportions of aggregate and cement.
With any specified aggregates the quantity of The following average figures for various aggregate sizes
water required to produce one cubic metre of and using typical medium graded sands are given as a
concrete of the desired workability, is known as guide for trial mix purposes:
the water requirement of the mix. In the
AVERAGE WATER CONTENT
particular case where the nominal size of the MAXIMUM SIZE OF COARSE 3
(ℓ/m ) OF CONCRETE TO
stone is 19 mm and the slump is 35 mm, the AGGREGATE (mm)
PRODUCE 35mm SLUMP
quantity of water required for one cubic metre 9,5 225
of concrete is known as the water demand of
13,2 215
the mix.
19,0 200
The sum of the absolute volumes of water,
cement, stone and sand making up one cubic 26,5 190
metre of concrete must equal one cubic meter. 37,5 180
This implies that the concrete is fully compacted
75 160
and that there are no air voids in the mass. In
150 140
fact, some entrapped air remains in the mix
after compaction but this usually amounts to Table 7‐12 : Maximum size of coarse aggregate
NOTE:
less than 1% and for practical purposes it may 1 For poorly shaped materials add up to 15 ℓ/m3
3
be ignored. 2 For better shaped materials subtract up to 10 ℓ/m
3
3 For 100 mm slump add up to 15 ℓ/m
7.15.6 Mix Design Procedure
stone has a different CBD the mass of stone required The following is a rough indication of the order of slump
must be adjusted as follows : and Vebe seconds for different degrees of workability as
measured by the slump test and the vibro‐consistometer:
in concrete strength due to this factor will be TYPE OF CEMENT RELATIVE DENSITY (RD)
relatively small. Ordinary Portland Cement 3,14
7 The sand controls the consistency of the mix.
High early strength cement 3,14
8 Poorly graded sand contributes to segregation
and bleeding and results in a harsh mix lacking in Slagment 2,90
cohesion. If a well‐graded sand is not available, Portland blast furnace cement 3,02
the use of a blending sand should be considered.
TYPE OF AGGREGATE
The addition of a fine pit sand to a river sand
lacking fines is a common example of blending Felsite 2,65
of concrete sands. Tillite 2,60 ‐ 2,75
9 The stone controls the sandiness of the mix.
Quartzite 2,70
10 Harsh concrete may often be improved by
increasing the ratio of sand to stone, i.e. by Dolomite 2,85
increasing the sand content and/or reducing the Dolerite 2,90 ‐ 3,10
stone content.
Norite 3,00
11 For nominal size aggregates of up to 26,5 mm it
is usually best to use a single‐sized stone. Andesite 2,85
12 When working with stone sizes of 37,5 mm, a Natural (quartz) sand 2,65
blend of approximately 2 parts of the large
depends on RD
stone with one part of single sized 19 mm or 13 Crusher sand
of parent rock
mm stone should be used. Table 7‐14 : Relative densities
13 For concrete to be pumped satisfactorily, the
mix must be more cohesive and plastic than
normally considered desirable for conventional 7.16 Guidelines for Design of Deviations
mixes. In order to achieve this it is important
that the correct type and quantity of sand is 7.16.1 General
used in the mix. The sand must be well‐graded Deviations will under normal conditions be unsurfaced.
with a good particle shape. The sand content Only in exceptional cases will a deviation be given a
will normally be about 3 to 8% higher than for a bituminous surface, and then only after approval has
conventional mix and should be between 38 and been given by the Senior Materials Engineer.
55% by mass of total aggregate.
14 A high degree of workability is required and a 7.16.2 Gravel deviations
slump range of between 60 mm and 90 mm is A single 150 mm thick layer of gravel will normally
regarded as the optimum for piston pumps and suffice. On thick sands, such as those prevailing in the
100 mm to 125 mm for pneumatic pumps. Kavango Region, this should be increased to 200 mm.
15 Approximate Bulk Relative Densities (RD) for the
most commonly used materials are as follows : The necessity for roadbed compaction will depend on the
nature of the material. The roadbed should always be
compacted on sand subgrades.
Layer works
As stated previously, a bitumen‐surfaced deviation will
not normally be used.
Surfacing
The optimum utilization of available materials, traffic
composition, environmental conditions expected during
the required life of the deviation and the length of time
the deviation is required to carry traffic will govern the
selection of surface treatment.
Office
1 boarded floor;
2 1 desk with 4 drawers and 3 chairs;
3 1 fluorescent light unit of 80 watt;
4 2 x 15 amp single phase power point;
5 shelving for files etc (minimum 3 m x 1,5 m x 0,5
Figure 8‐1 : Typical field laboratory layout m);
6 air conditioning unit with 9000 BTU
cooling/heating capacity .
8.1.2 Minimum Requirements
The minimum requirements for the various sections of PI Room
the laboratory complex are as set out below. 1 concrete floor;
2 3,2 m long work bench 0,8 m wide with concrete
Main Laboratory top;
1 concrete floor; 3 1 fluorescent light unit of 80 watt;
2 10 m length of work bench, 0,8 m wide; 4 1 Anglepoise ‐ type reading lamp;
5 2 x 15 amp single phase power points;
On submission of the duplicate samples, the field The statistic ”t” as in the following formula has a
laboratory must also submit the results of testing on its STUDENT distribution,
half of the duplicate sample. Any samples submitted to
the Control Laboratory without the required │ │ √
documentation; or where the bags are unsuitable,
damaged or open, will not be accepted for testing by the
where
Control Laboratory and will be discarded. In the case of
field laboratories controlled by the Consultant, the latter the mean, and
is encouraged to carry out internal control by arranging the standard deviation of the set (A‐B)
duplicate testing between the field laboratory and the of difference with sample size N
Consulting Engineer's own central laboratory. Inter‐
laboratory testing must nevertheless be carried out The levels of significance to be adopted in testing the Ho
regularly between the site laboratory of the Consultant hypothesis are < 1 per cent for "not significant" and > 5
and that of the Contractor. per cent for "highly significant". Intermediate levels of
significance are considered to be "probably significant".
8.3.4 Duplicate testing between two laboratories
The value of E in Table 8‐1 : E‐values for statistical
Comparison of multiple samples analysis must be used for analysis of comparison test
To ensure that the test results obtained on works that results.
are financed in full or in part by the Roads Authority are
accurate and reliable, the test results obtained by the If the difference between two sets of results is
two laboratories are assessed on a statistical approach, considered to be "highly significant" the effects of such a
based on paired observations. difference must be investigated by the Consulting
Engineer in the case of projects where the field
The minimum number of samples shall not be less than laboratory is controlled by him, and by the Senior
six. Materials Engineer in other cases.
acceptable because the classification of the quality of the excavations. The correct procedures for the calibration
material is questionable. and use of these instruments must be followed.
Equipment such as proving rings, load cells and presses These readings must be taken with the reference block
shall be verified by the South African Bureau of Standards on the same spot every time. This data must be
(SABS). All equipment shall be recalibrated at least once submitted at the end of every month to the Senior
per year, at the site where the equipment is used. Material Engineer.
Registration and Verification The reference block of the apparatus must be placed on
All nuclear apparatus shall be registered by the Ministry the same spot when taking the counts before and after
of Health and Social Services before it is allowed on site. the testing of each test section.
Annual certificates issued by this Ministry which
8.4.3 Maintenance
authorise possession and transportation of nuclear
All laboratory equipment must be maintained so that it
equipment must be available on the site at all times. This
conforms to the specified requirements at all times.
certificate will be issued only if calibration and leak test
certificates had been obtained from an institution Sufficient spare capacity of consumables and items
accredited by SABS to carry out these tests and to issue subject to rapid wear or liable to be easily damaged shall
the related certificates. be kept in storage at the field laboratory so that no
holdup in the flow of testing occurs.
Before any nuclear apparatus is used for testing, it must
first be verified by the Roads Authority at its Control
Laboratory in Windhoek if so instructed by the Project 8.5 Laboratory Personnel
Control Engineer. Thereafter, it shall be calibrated at
8.5.1 General
least once per year as well as after each servicing and
The following system determines the degree of training
each time after it has been repaired.
required for technical personnel that carry out laboratory
and field work. This method of evaluation consists of
A responsible person shall be nominated in writing to the
three levels, ie Level I, Level II and Level III. In order to
Senior Materials Engineer for each construction site, such
qualify for the higher levels, the tester must carry out
person to be responsible for the safety, security, testing
more advanced testing and also be exposed to greater
and operation of all nuclear gauges used on that
responsibilities. To obtain any credit for the higher level
particular site.
the tester must first be successful in the lower levels.
The user of nuclear instruments is made aware that there 8.5.2 Evaluation
are certain limitations to the accuracy of test results The evaluation of each level is a twofold process. The
where nuclear instruments are used to measure moisture first phase evaluates the testers' ability to carry out the
content, density at different depths and density in practical part of a test while the second phase makes
provision for extra credit when the tester can also do the TRAINING
CATEGORY REMARKS
computational part of that test, ie the tester must be VALUE “V”
General worker To qualify as Grade II 1
able to do the calculations, graphs, etc without the help
(labourer)
of a supervisor or computer program. A standard form To qualify as Grade III 2
shall be filled in by the training officer for each level. The Qualified as Grade III 4
explanation of and how to fill in columns is as follows: Technical Semi‐qualified 2
Assistant
Column A: The tester shall have carried out at least Fully qualified 5
the number of tests indicated in this Pupil Technician nd
Start with 2 year training 2
column to qualify for Level I.
rd
Column B: This column shows the values to be Start with 3 year training 5
entered in column C when the tester can
Fully trained 6
perform the test without any supervision.
Materials
No pro‐rata mark awards are allowed. Training sufficient 8
Technician
The numeric value depends on the
Chief Materials Registered, registerable or
complexity of the test. N/A
Technician well experienced
Column D: The value in this column is carried forward Table 8‐3 : Training value "V"
to column E when the tester can also
complete the computational aspect of the On the basis of the above paragraph a Chief Materials
test including graphs (where necessary) Technician should qualify to be registered, or be
without the help of a supervisor or
registered, with the Engineering Council of Namibia as at
computer program. No pro‐rata mark
awards are allowed. least an Engineering Technician, and/or must have
Total: The total equals the sum of the subtotals substantial experience in materials testing and
of columns C and E. This value is not construction supervision in the field of road construction,
transferable to other levels. in the opinion of the Senior Materials Engineer.
Training The training value (V) is based on a scale
Value: from 0 to 10. The V‐value depends on the 8.5.4 Standard evaluation forms
total scored for each level and, in the case Forms suitable for evaluating laboratory staff at various
of Level II or III, on that scored on the training levels are included in Annexure B of this Manual.
previous levels as well.
The symbols “t”, “o”, “d”, “m and “r”, as well as the
The total given minimum for Levels I and II as given is a
evaluation criteria and point system are explained on the
precondition for commencement of training on the next
standard evaluation forms in Annexure B.
level.
Testing
8.6 Inspecting and Reporting
methods
8.6.1 Inspections
equipment
Field laboratories will, whenever possible, be inspected
equipment calibration certificates
by the Senior Materials Engineer or his representative at
the beginning of the contract or project and at least once sample register
per year thereafter. This inspection will cover testing
Quarries and Borrow Pits
facilities, equipment, procedures and personnel.
roadbed and fills
Where a Consultant is involved in a project, he is
selected layer
encouraged to be represented at such inspections by a
subbase
senior staff member from his own central laboratory. In
base
any event, he is required to conduct a similar inspection
asphalt and seal aggregates
himself at least once per year, six months after the date
concrete aggregates
of each inspection or intended inspection by the Senior
Materials Engineer. The Consultant remains responsible Miscellaneous Sources
for the correct and efficient operation of laboratories
under his control, irrespective of any inspections which water
may be carried out by the Roads Authority's staff; and cement
must plan the frequency of his inspections accordingly.
Control of Pavement Layers Including Design
8.6.2 Reporting
Following an inspection by the Roads Authority or the roadbed and fills
Consultant’s staff, the findings of the inspection must be selected layer
reported to the Resident Engineer and the deficiencies, if subbase
any, must be corrected, all within 21 days of the base
inspection. asphalt and seals
gravel wearing course
A copy of the inspection report must be sent to the
Senior Materials Engineer and the Resident Engineer Control of Concrete Works Including Design
must notify that official in writing as soon as the required
remedial measures have been completed. No sub‐divisions
9.1 General The control test references for design verification and
control of constructed layers are provided in Annexure F
9.1.1 Specifications of the Construction Manual.
Prior to assessing the qualities of constituent materials
and/or structural components, it is imperative that the
qualities described under Materials Standards in Section
6 of this Manual, the Standard Specifications and Project
Specifications where applicable, be thoroughly studied.
9.1.2 Inspection
Geotechnical Aspects
Geotechnical aspects which would have been identified
during the initial phases of design or which may be
encountered during construction include:
stability of cuttings
stability of fills
settlement of fills
poor subgrades:
o collapsing soils
o expansive soils
o settlement of soft or loose materials
high ground water tables
subsurface drainage problems.
Control Requirements
In general, sufficient quality control shall be exercised
during the design stage so as to avoid substandard
materials being used during construction. As a guide, the
references for the control tests of various material
components are given in the test data tables in Annexure
D of this Manual. The tables include reference numbers
of test methods, bench sheets, bench books and report