Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Đúng 300 T - 3

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

The first concern about cloning is whether this method is safe enough to be applied in real life.

Although cloning has existed for two decades, it is substantially unreliable due to having
extremely low percentages of success as well as some medical concerns. In 2002, Weldon
pointed out “Ninety-five to ninety-seven percent of animal cloning attempts still end in failure”,
this can be seen through the case of the scientist Wilmut, who had failed 276 times before
successfully generating Dolly the sheep. Moreover, following the high failure rate in the cloning
process is the likelihood for viable clones to suffer from severe health problems like serious
genetic malformation and shortened lifespan (Savulescu, 1999). Return to Dolly, she was
reported to die young since her aging genes were short, as the result of cloning (Knight, 2003).
To recap, the cloning technique is still at a primitive stage, therefore it should not be applied on
both animals and humans.

Secondly, it is worth consider ethical and moral problems that exist around cloning, especially in
human cloning field. If human cloning procedure is legal, it would start the act of using human
being as a tool to create eugenic selection and exploit human resources. Although a 2017 History
Eugenics article states that people could improve species by “selective mating people with
specific desirable hereditary traits”, according to Savulescu (1999) and Green (1999), this action
could contravene “a person’s right to individuality” and “reduce diversity in the human gene
pool”. Furthermore, cloning humans would create an illegal organ trafficking industry. To clone a
human, numerous human’s organs are required, however, the demand for organs is usually larger
than the supply, consequently, black markets dealing in organs appear. Ultimately, human cloning
need to be banned or else infringements related to human rights and dignity would be
unavoidable.

Cite hộ t cái link này với, tại lap nhà t đang hỏng :3:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3393-dolly-the-sheep-dies-young/

Green, R. M. (1999). I, CLone. Scientific American. Retrieved from


https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/i-clone/

Onion, A., Sullivan, M. & Mullen, M. (2017). Eugenics. Retrieved from


https://www.history.com/topics/germany/eugenics

Savulescu, J. (1999). Should We Clone Human Beings? Cloning as a Source of Tissue for
Transplantation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2), 87-95. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718262

Weintraub, K. (2016). 20 Years after Dolly the Sheep Led the Way - Where Is Cloning
Now? Scientific American. Retrieved from
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/20-years-after-dolly-the-sheep-led-the-way-w
here-is-cloning-now/

Weintraub, K. (2019). Cloning’s Long Legacy - And Why It’ll Never Be Used on Humans.
Retrieved from DiscoverMagazine.com:
https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/clonings-long-legacy-and-why-itll-never-be-u
sed-on-humans

END

In conclusion, although cloning holds both merits and demerits, it is still being analysed as well
as researched for further applications. Therefore it is important to put appropriate regulations on
the practice to not only eliminate unfortunate consequences but also make the best out of it.

Open

Cloning technique, defined as the production of genetically identical individuals, has widely
come into the public’s awareness since the birth of Dolly the sheep in 1997. However, after two
decades, this newly born science still raises numerous controversial issues. Contemplating both
benefits and drawbacks of the reproduction of individuals’ facsimile, the method is encouraged
to some extent.

You might also like