Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

A Study On The No ID FINAL

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

RL

One junior school in the south-east of England between October 1998 and June 1999,

proposes that a relaxed enforcement of school uniform created a space for pupils to use

clothing as a means of gaining recognition, of generating common bonds, and of sharing

interests and intimacy within the peer group cultures. There is a specific concentration on

boys' cultures, and it is argued that clothing and footwear was used as an important

component in the construction, negotiation and performance of masculinity. Certain items

and brand names acquired a specific, symbolic value, and pupils who attempted to dress

and conform to the school rules and regulations ran a high risk of being stigmatised and

subordinated. These pupils were also partly policed and controlled by homophobia

(Swain, J. (2002). The right stuff: fashioning an identity through clothing in a junior

school. Gender and Education, 14(1), 53-69. Accessed on October 22, 2018 at

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09540250120098889). The often‐posed

dichotomy between the interest and choice theory of rights can obfuscate a proper

understanding of children's rights. We need a gradualist model in which the grounds for

attributing rights to a being change in response to the development of autonomy. Rights

for children initially function to protect their interests but, as they develop into full‐

fledged autonomous choosers, rights function to ensure that their choices, even those that

do not serve their welfare, are respected (Brennan, S. (2003). On 10 December 2007 the

Akron City School Board – following the precedent set by many school systems across

the United States and the world – instituted a policy of mandatory school uniforms for all

students in grades K–8. The measure was met with mixed reviews. While many parents

supported the measure, a small group of parents from a selective, arts-focused, middle
school (grades 4–8) objected to the policy. It was their contention that children attending

this particular school should be exempt from the policy since their children were

particularly creative, and the new policy constituted an unjust infringement of their

child's freedom of expression. Children's choices or children's interests: Which do their

rights protect?. Accessed on October 22, 2018 at https://philpapers.org/rec/BRECCO).

Children's rights exist on a continuum from rights that protect their interests to those that

protect their choices. Since the majority of children at the age specified by the policy fall

on the interest side of the rights spectrum, restricting their liberty with respect to dress is

not morally problematic. Upon the idea of the distinction between mere expression as

opposed to substantive expression to argue that most children, particularly those in the

pre-teen years, lack the cognitive ability to exercise the latter (Vopat, M. C. (2010).

Mandatory school uniforms and freedom of expression. Ethics and Education, 5(3), 203-

215. Accessed on October 22, 2018 at

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17449642.2010.519139). To raise school

participation, many programs in developing countries eliminate or reduce private

contributions to education. Announcing a free school uniform program had a negative

impact on attendance. The school uniforms were distributed in only 63% of the schools

that were told that they would get them, thus this negative impact could have been

generated by creating false expectations of free distribution, or also by a sunk cost effect

on those who did actually receive the uniforms (Hidalgo, D., Onofa, M., Oosterbeek, H.,

& Ponce, J. (2013). Can provision of free school uniforms harm attendance? Evidence

from Ecuador. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 43-51. Accessed on October 22,

2018 at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387813000035). A
school uniform positively affected the perception of academic abilities and school-related

behaviour of the clothed models for students and teachers ( Behling, D. (1994). School

uniforms and person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(2), 723-729. Accessed

on October 22, 2018 at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.723).

The impact of uniform/dress codes and practices on school climate, educational

attainment, and student affective and cognitive domains in Washington (District of

Columbia) schools were for interest in a policy included the need to teach students that

clothes do not make a person, financial savings for family, and parent concern that

children might participate in an illicit act to purchase designer clothing, elementary

schools were more likely than secondary schools to be planning to implement a uniform

policy, and senior high schools were more likely than elementary or junior high schools

to be planning a dress code policy, parents were usually involved in developing a uniform

policy in elementary schools, but not in secondary schools, the average price of a

uniform for males in 1991 was $119.57, compared with $113.56 in 1989, and for females

was $130.67 in 1991, compared with $108.47 in 1989, there was no significant change in

overall attendance or educational attainment after implementing a policy, and parents

and school staff believe that wearing uniforms has had a positive impact on school

climate (Stevenson Jr, Z., & Chunn, E. W. (1991). Uniform Policy/Dress Codes: School

Staff and Parent Perceptions of Need and Impact. Accessed on October 22, 2018 at

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED331933). Selected middle and high school principals measure

the impact of school-uniform dress codes on perceived level of school violence.

measuring the impact of school uniforms on principals' perception of violence, selected

variables such as region, gender, and educational level were measured to assess for
significant differences in principals' perception of violence. The aim was to develop a

study that addressed the issue of school uniforms in such a way that the results could be

generalized to other middle and high school populations across the United States. In

addition to examining the history of the first district wide uniform dress code

implementation, this study cited specific empirical inquiries that have provided support

for and criticism against the use of school uniforms as an alternative in addressing the

problem of school violence (Wilson, R. E. (1999). Impact of School Uniform Dress Code

on Principal Perception of School Violence. Accessed on October 22, 2018 at

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED449546).

You might also like