Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Kamal 2020 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1529 052100

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Journal of Physics: Conference

Series

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like


- Research on Four Different Designs of
Design voltage comparator 14-bit for successive Comparator
Haomin Zhu
approximation analog-to-digital converter - Innovative Techniques in Comparator
Designs
Yiming Chen
To cite this article: Nur Zazmera Mustafa Kamal et al 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1529 052100
- A full-scale complementary dynamic
comparator
Yinzheng Xi, Nan Li, Jietao Diao et al.

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 121.210.206.4 on 12/08/2024 at 10:49


JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

Design voltage comparator 14-bit for successive


approximation analog-to-digital converter

Nur Zazmera Mustafa Kamal1, Nabihah Ahmad2, Siti Hawa Ruslan3, Hasmayadi
Abdul Majid4, C Y Chia5, Muhammad Syafiee Kamaruzaman6 and Matthew
Khoo Kah Wen7
12367
Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia,86400 Parit
Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
45
IC Design Department, MIMOS Berhad, Malaysia

Abstract- A comparator plays a significant role in the development of an ADC. This paper present a
comparator design aims to achieve a small offset value at a high resolution by using double tail latch. In
this project, the comparator is designed for the purpose of implementation in a 14-bit Successive
Approximation Register (SAR) Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC). The SAR architecture is the most
ideal counter type ADC for implementation in a high-resolution comparator design. The proposed
comparator circuit is designed using Silterra C18G 0.18um process, whereby its schematic design and
layout simulation is created by employing Synopsys EDA Tools together with transient and Monte Carlo
simulations. A double tail regenerative comparator is studied and investigated during this project. The
complete simulation results are generated using a 3.3V power supply. The proposed comparator operates
at 5MHz clock frequency with a latch offset voltage of 32mV.

1. Introduction
Successive-approximation-register (SAR) analog to digital converters (ADC) are widely used
architectures in medium to high-resolution applications with sampling rates under 5MS/s. SAR ADC
implements a binary search algorithm [1]. A binary search algorithm is the closest digital code for an
input signal. The ADC sampling rate depends on the number of output samples available over a few
successive approximation cycles. The SAR ADC itself consists of a comparator, digital-analog
converter, and logic. In the application of an SAR ADC, it provides low power consumption and
makes the ADC ideal for particular purposes, such as for data acquisition. Comparator is one of the
fundamental parts in analog and mixed-signal circuits which can affect the whole ADC's performance
[2-4]. Comparator is used to compare an analog signal with a reference voltage and provides a digital
output signal based on the comparison. If the voltage difference between the two-input voltage is
higher than the threshold voltage, it returns a HIGH output; otherwise, the output is LOW [5], [6].
This concept is depicted in figure 1.

Figure 1. Block Diagram of Comparator

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

The expression of the output voltage can be derived as shown in the equation (1). The main
requirement in designing a comparator is to have a low offset voltage and the ability to sense an input-
referred noise that is less than one ADC Least Significant Bit (LSB) in value. Additionally, to reduce
the comparator offset, the offset cancellation technique was proposed which further improved the
accuracy of the comparator.
(1)
{

In this paper, a design architecture of a double tail is present that investigates the offset value latch that
affecting high-speed comparators [5]. These high-speed comparators can be realized by increasing the
size of the tail transistor, but it induces a large current in the circuit which compromises the die area as
well as the power. The conversion speed of the comparator is limited by its internal decision-making
process. When designed adequately, the comparator is useful in many applications such as zero-
crossing detectors, peak detectors, switching power regulators and data transmission. Therefore, a 14-
bit SAR ADC with the implementation of offset cancellation is thoroughly discussed in the following
sections which will enable the comparator to achieve its prerequisite design standards.

2. System Level
This section will discuss the resolution of ADC from the previous work that may affect the difference
in the input voltage. The work in [2] presents the dynamic latch comparator that able to sense the input
different voltage of 3.9mV with an 8-bit resolution SAR ADC. The main purpose of this design is to
reset and increase the speed of the comparator due to the low-resolution architecture of this ADC
having an inherently fast conversion process. Author [7] implements an 11-bit resolution ADC with a
power supply of 1.8V. A preamplifier and latch are included in this work which shows an improved
characteristic of the comparator in terms of its speed and resolution. The author in [1] proposes the
highest resolution design which introduces a 12-bit SAR architecture with a supply voltage of 3.3V.
The design comparator is able to sense an input voltage difference of 610uV and produce the desired
output based on the detected difference. Table 1 shows the comparison between the minimum
detectable input voltage difference (LSB) of this work and that of previous works with different
resolutions and power supply values.
Table 1. Comparison of the resolution based on the previous work
Author Technology (µm) Resolution (bit) Power Supply LSB (V)
(V)
[2] 0.18 8 1 3.9m
[7] 0.18 11 1.8 800µ
[1] 0.18 12 3.3 610µ
Proposed 0.18 14 3.3 181µ

3. Comparator Design
This section discusses the comparator design that consists of the pre-amplifier and the regenerative
latch. For fully differential topology, the resolution of the comparator must be accurate to half of the
Least Significant Bit (LSB). The LSB is calculated depending on the resolution of the ADC. In this
present work, the value of LSB is 181uV. The comparator produces the output high when the
differential input is greater than 32mV and vice versa.

2
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

3.1 Double Tail


Double Tail comparator is shown in figure 2 [8]. This topology provides two tails of transistors which
in turn provide current separately to differential amplifier and latch circuit. This structure is consists of
two stages such as amplification and latch stage with a less stacked transistor. It can use on low
voltage applications. It is also possible to employ low tail current in the amplification stage that can
increase the offset of comparator. The operation of the double tail is shown in figure 2. During the
reset mode, clk = 0, and both M1 and M12 are off. Transistor M8 and M9 are switched on pre-charged
output node to VDD. Transistor M4 and M7 are discharges the outp and outn to the ground. When the
clock goes high, clk = 1, both M1 and M12 are on and M8 and M9 are off. During this operation, the
charges on the fn and fp node begin to decrease with the input voltage different. Thus, the charge value
of these nodes depends on the input voltage of inn and inp. The aspect ratio of the double tail circuit is
shown in table 2.

VDD

CLKB M1

M2 M3

Outn Outp

M4 M5 M6 M7

VSS

VDD
CLK
M8 M9

fp fn

INN M10 M11 INP

CLK M12

GND1

Figure 2. Double Tail Latch

Table 2. Aspect Ratio Double Tail Circuit

Transistor W(µ) L(µ)


M1 1.8 0.34
M2&M3 1.8 0.34
M4&M7 1 0.34
M5&M6 0.6 0.34
M8&M9 1.8 3.4
M10&M11 20 0.34
M12 0.6 0.34

3
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

3.2 Preamplifier
In the comparator, the basic circuit consists of a preamplifier followed by a latch. Preamplifier is
chosen in our design as it exhibits good characteristics in realizing a high resolution and ideal
performing comparator [9]. The main purpose of the preamplifier circuit is to amplify the input signal
feeds it to the input of latch. Preamplifier amplifies the small difference between the input voltage and
reference voltage to a level high enough to be detected by the latch. The offset error caused by the
unbalanced charge residues and transistor mismatch is the main drawback of the latched comparator.
Figures 4 shows a single-stage fully differential amplifier circuit with PMOS cross-coupled load and
current mirror as a bias current. The benefit of cross-coupled load is a fast settling time and a better
Common-Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR). The common-mode input voltage is defined by equation (2)
with reference to figure 3 [10]. The current mirror is chosen in this design due to the low gain
requirement and circuit simplicity. The aspect ratio of the preamplifier circuit is shown in table 3.

(2)

Figure 3. Symbol for ideal op-amp

4
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

Figure 4. Single Stage Fully Differential Amplifier

Table 3. Aspect Ratio of Preamplifier Circuit

Transistor W(µ) L(µ) Multiplier


M0&M1 1 0.5 2
M2&M3 1 0.5 1
M4&M5 5 1 2
M6 1 5 12
M7 1 5 1

3.3 Offset cancellation


The offset of the preamplifier is higher than the required comparator offset [1]. Output offset
cancellation techniques are applied in this works in order to degrade the preamplifier offset. This
output cancellation happens during the sampling phase in the SAR ADC operation. Figure 5
demonstrates the offset cancellation process, whereby three preamplifiers are cascaded together. The
gain for each preamplifier is labelled as A1, A2, and A3. The offset of the preamplifier is stored in the
capacitor with a value of 20ux20u A. The capacitors are connected in series and labelled as C1, C2,
and C3. Three switches in total are needed to cancel the offset voltage. Figure 6 switch is built using
an N-channel MOS (NMOS) transistor with the minimum width and length shown in table 4.
Switches are used for offset cancellation by utilizing the n-channel MOS. Figure 7 shows the
switching timing diagram that happens during the sampling process. Switch phi1 opens (turns off)
when switching phi2 and switch phi3 are still closed (turned on). The total value of the offset
preamplifier that is produced by the preamplifier A1, A2 and A3 are stored in the capacitors c1, c2 and
c3 respectively. These switches act as an output cancellation whereby each of them is connected in
series with their respective capacitors. In SAR ADC implementation, voltage input (Vin) is connected
to the output DAC and phi1, phi2 and phi3 are connected to the common-mode voltage (Vcm).

Table 4. Aspect Ratio of Switch N-Channel MOS.

Transistor W(µ) L(µ) Multiplier


M0 12 0.34 8

5
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

Figure 5. Offset Cancellation Process

Figure 6. Switch N-Channel MOS. Figure 7. Switching Timing Diagram.

4. Simulation Result
Simulation is carried out using 0.18um CMOS technology with an operating voltage of 3.3V. The
simulation result is obtained by HSPICE. The latch simulation is carried out using the Monte Carlo
simulation. From the simulation, the latch offset obtained about 32mV. Therefore, a preamplifier is
needed to amplify a 181µV signal in order to get a higher magnitude. An amplifier requires a
minimum gain (Av) is given by equation (3). By referring to this equation and assuming that each
preamplifier has a 5.6 gain value.
(3)

6
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

Figure 8 shows the schematic representation of the complete 14-bit SAR ADC design using the
proposed comparator to achieve a higher conversion speed. Figure 9 shows the transient simulation
response by the latch. The input of the latch is the differential input voltage. The total simulation time
is 760ns, whereby 50ns is consumed for each cycle. The transient signal shows the difference between
INP and INN. Each phase or level of the simulation uses a small step voltage of 1mV. The output
signal indicates a trip in the signal at a certain value of the input difference.

Figure 8. Comparator Circuit

Figure 9. Transient Response of the proposed latch.

Figure 10 shows the simulation results of the Monte Carlo simulation. Monte Carlo simulation is
implemented using 500 iterations. In this work, a higher iteration in the simulation process will
produce the best output latch result. The input offset voltage of the proposed design is 32mV for one
conversion cycle. The positive offset value is 32mV while the negative offset value is 0. The latch
output produces a high range of offset value. Based on the analysis of this result, the offset voltage of
the latch has an output range of 32mV, which produces the same offset compare to the transient
simulation. Since the transient simulation is the same as the Monte Carlo simulation, the proposed
design is considered as work successfully.

7
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

Figure 10. Result of Monte Carlo

The simulation of comparator SAR ADC are simulated by the input signal are toggled with various
variation of step value such as big positive to small negative, big negative to small positive, small
positive to small negative and small negative to big positive. This simulation covers the typical case
values which could happen during the SAR ADC operation. The preamplifier should higher than
32mV before comparing the signal goes high. The output preamplifier in Figure 11 shows that each
input signal is toggled and the output complete before the clock signal goes high.

Figure 11. Result of preamplifier

The output of the comparator is shown in Figure 12. The comparator output goes high value when the
input is small and big positive differential input. Therefore, for the small and big negative differential
input, the comparator gives low output. This simulation done with the 5Mhz of the 200ns period per
cycle.

Figure 12. Comparator Output Signal.

5.0 Conclusion
As a conclusion, a new high-resolution comparator for 14-bit SAR ADC with 5MHz clock frequency
was proposed and implemented using 0.18um technology. This paper concludes the lower offset of the
8
JICETS 2019 IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1529 (2020) 052100 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052100

double tail latch and pre-amplifier based comparator design. Therefore, by using the output offset
cancellation technique, the comparator offset is degrade to less than 181µV. The design comparator
consumes of 171µm x 240µm chip size area.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express gratitude for financial support and contributions from Ministry of
Education (MOE) Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) Vot number 1630.

Reference
[1] H. A. Majid and Y. Yusoff, “Design of Comparator with Offset Cancellation for 12-bit
1.6MS/s Successive Approximation ADC,” Proceeding - 2015 IEEE Int. Circuits Syst. Symp.
ICSyS 2015, no. December, pp. 40–43, 2016.
[2] A. Bekal, R. Joshi, M. Goswami, B. R. Singh, and A. Srivatsava, “An Improved Dynamic
Latch Based Comparator For 8-bit Asynchronous SAR ADC,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc.
Annu. Symp. VLSI, ISVLSI, vol. 07–10–July, pp. 178–182, 2015.
[3] H. Zheng and X. Fan, “A Preamplifier-Latch Comparator For High Accuracy High Speed
Switched-Capacitors Pipelined ADC,” 2014 9th Int. Symp. Commun. Syst. Networks Digit.
Signal Process. CSNDSP 2014, pp. 1144–1148, 2014.
[4] R. U. Ljk, V. L. Q. Qp, S. Mahdavi, M. Jafarzadeh, M. Poreh, and S. Ataei, “An Ultra High-
Resolution Low Propagation Delay Time and Low Power with 1.25GS/s CMOS Dynamic
Latched Comparator for High-Speed SAR ADCs in 180nm Technology,” IEEE 4th Int. Conf.
Knowledge-Based Eng. Innov. Dec.22nd,2017, pp. 260–265, 2017.
[5] E. James and A. R. Sankar, “Investigation on High Speed Double Tail Comparator,” vol. 1, no.
June, pp. 106–109, 2016.
[6] D. Parashar, “Design of a CMOS Comparator using 0 . 18µm Technology,” no. May, pp. 977–
982, 2014.
[7] N. S. Gharabaghlo and T. M. Khaneshan, “High Resolution CMOS Voltage Comparator for
High Speed SAR ADCs,” 2017 25th Iran. Conf. Electr. Eng. ICEE 2017, pp. 511–514,
2017.
[8] A. Rezapour, H. Shamsi, H. Abbasizadeh, and K. Y. Lee, “Low Power High Speed Dynamic
Comparator,” Proc. - IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., vol. 2018–May, pp. 1–5, 2018.
[9] S. Kazeminia and S. Mahdavi, “A 800MS/s, 150μV Input-Referred Offset Single-Stage
Latched Comparator,” Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. Mix. Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. Mix. 2016, pp.
119–123, 2016.
[10] P. E. Allen and D. R. Holberg, “CMOS Analog Circuit Design.” 2002.

You might also like