EPC Notes Module 2
EPC Notes Module 2
NOTES
Subject with code: Electronic Principles and Circuits (BEC303)
Module 2
Prepared By
MOSFET
Biasing in MOS amplifier circuits:
Fixing VGS, Fixing VG, Drain to Gate feedback resistor.
The most straight forward approach to biasing a MOSFET is to fix its gate-to-source
voltage VGS to the value required to provide the desired ID. This voltage value can be
derived from the power-supply voltage VDD through the use of an appropriate voltage
divider. Alternatively, it can be derived from another suitable reference voltage that might be
available in the system. This is not a good approach to biasing a MOSFET. To understand the
reason for this statement, recall that ID is
and note that the values of the threshold voltage Vt, the oxide-capacitance Cox, and (to a
lesser extent) the transistor aspect ratio vary widely among devices of supposedly the same
size and type. The spread is also large in integrated circuits, especially among devices
fabricated on different wafers and certainly between different batches of wafers. Furthermore,
both Vt and μn depend on temperature, with the result that if we fix the value of VGS, the
drain current ID becomes very much temperature dependent. As shown in the Fig. 5.51 two
iD–vGS characteristic curves representing extreme values in a batch of MOSFETs of the same
type having different current ID for the fixed value of VGS.
An excellent biasing technique for discrete MOSFET circuits consists of fixing the dc
voltage at the gate, VG, and connecting a resistance in the source lead, as shown in Fig.
5.52(a).For this circuit we can write
Here the resistor RS provides negative feedback, which acts to stabilize the value of
the bias current ID. To see how this comes about, consider what happens when ID increases
for whatever reason. Equation (5.93) indicates that since VG is constant, VGS will have to
decrease. This in turn results in a decrease in ID, a change that is opposite to that initially
assumed. Thus the action of RS works to keep ID as constant as possible. This negative
feedback action of RS gives it the name degeneration resistance.
Figure 5.52(b) provides a graphical illustration of the effectiveness of this biasing
scheme. Here too we show the iD–vGS characteristics for two devices that represent the
extremes of a batch of MOSFETs. Observe that compared to the case of fixed VGS, here the
variability obtained in ID is much smaller. Also, note that the variability decreases as VG and
RS are made larger (thus providing a bias line that is less steep).
Two possible practical discrete implementations of this bias scheme are shown in Fig.
5.52(c) and (e). The circuit in Fig. 5.52(c) utilizes one power-supply VDD and derives VG
through a voltage divider (RG1, RG2). As shown in Fig. 5.52(d) capacitor CC1 blocks dc and
thus allows us to couple the signal vsig to the amplifier input without disturbing the MOSFET
dc bias point. Finally, note that in. When two power supplies are available, as is often the
case, the somewhat simpler bias arrangement of Fig. 5.52(e) can be utilized.
which is identical in form to Eq. (5.93), which describes the operation of the bias scheme
discussed above [that in Fig. 5.52(a)]. Thus, here too, if ID for some reason changes, say
increases, then Eq. (5.96) indicates that VGS must decrease. The decrease in VGS in turn
causes a decrease in ID, a change that is opposite in direction to the one originally assumed.
Thus the negative feedback or degeneration provided by RG works to keep the value of ID as
constant as possible.
For small signal operation we utilize the conceptual amplifier circuit shown in Fig.
5.34. Here the MOS transistor is biased by applying a dc voltage VGS, and the input signal to
be amplified, vgs, is superimposed on the dc bias voltage VGS. The output voltage is
taken at the drain.
The dc bias current ID can be found by setting the signal vgs to zero; thus,
Here VOV = VGS – Vt is the overdrive voltage at which the MOSFET is biased to operate.
The dc voltage at the drain, VDS, will be
The minus sign in Eq. (5.51) indicates that the output signal vds is 180° out of phase
with respect to the input signal vgs. This is illustrated in Fig. 5.36, which shows vGS and vDS.
The input signal is assumed to have a triangular waveform with an amplitude much smaller
than2(VGS – Vt), the small-signal condition in Eq. (5.44), to ensure linear operation.
For operation in the saturation region at all times, the minimum value of vDS should
not fall below the corresponding value of vGS by more than Vt. Also, the maximum value of
vDS should be smaller than VDD; otherwise the FET will enter the cut off region and the
peaks of the output signal waveform will be clipped off.
Small-Signal Equivalent-Circuit Models
From a signal point of view, the FET behaves as a voltage-controlled current source.
It accepts a signal vgs between gate and source and provides a current gmvgs at the drain
terminal. The input resistance of this controlled source is very high—ideally, infinite. The
output resistance that is, the resistance looking into the drain also is high, and we have
assumed it to be infinite thus far. Putting all of this together, we arrive at the circuit in Fig.
5.37(a), which represents the small-signal operation of the MOSFET and is thus a small-
signal model or a small-signal equivalent circuit.
The most serious shortcoming of the small-signal model of Fig. 5.37(a) is that it
assumes the drain current in saturation to be independent of the drain voltage. But the drain
current does in fact depend on vDS in a linear manner. Such dependence was modeled by a
finite resistance ro between drain and source, whose value was given by
The Transconductance gm
We shall now take a closer look at the MOSFET transconductance given by Eq.
(5.47), which we rewrite with Kn = Kn’ (W/L) as follows:
Characterizing Amplifiers
The Common-Source (CS) Amplifier without source resistance (Rs)
Usually RD much lower than ro (RD << ro) , thus voltage gain is
With RD << ro
Thus overall voltage gain Gv is given by
Gv = vo / vsig = vo / vi = Av
It is most convenient to use the T model, as shown in Fig. 5.50(b). Note that we have
included , ro simply because it is very easy to do so. From the circuit of figure 5.50(a) we can
write input resistance as