Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Draft Resolution by The USA-Japan Bloc

    Uploaded by

    thiruspk70

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Draft Resolution by The USA-Japan Bloc

    Uploaded by

    thiruspk70
    7 views5 pages

    Original Title

    Draft Resolution by the USA-Japan Bloc (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    7 views5 pages

    Draft Resolution by The USA-Japan Bloc

    Uploaded by

    thiruspk70

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 5

    Committee: General Assembly 1st Committee -Disarmament and International Security

    Committee (DISEC)
    Agenda: Ethical Frameworks for the development and use of AI in weaponry
    Sponsor: United States of America, Japan
    Signatories: Republic of South Africa, Mexico, State of Libya, Australia, Republic of
    Korea, Democratic Republic of Congo, Russian Federation, Yemen, Ukraine, Canada,
    Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Ireland, State of Israel, France, Republic of
    India, Saudi Arabia, Spain, United kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
    Lebanese Republic, Syrian Arab Republic, People’s republic of Bangladesh, Kingdom of
    Sweden, Republic of Estonia, Kingdom of Netherlands, Argentine republic, Portuguese
    republic, Socialist republic of Vietnam, Republic of Senegal,

    The General Assembly,

    Recognizing the rapid advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) with its dual use nature
    and its applications in military technology, and the potential implications for global peace
    and security,

    Acknowledging the importance of maintaining international peace and security while


    ensuring that technological advancements in AI are developed and used in compliance
    with international law, including international humanitarian law and human rights law,

    Reaffirming the principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, including the
    commitment to prevent the scourge of war and to promote peaceful relations among
    nations,

    Recalling previous resolutions on disarmament and the regulation of armaments,


    including resolutions on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems (LAWS) and emerging
    technologies in lethal autonomous weapons,

    Saipem Classification - General


    Use
    Expressing concern about the lack of a comprehensive international framework
    governing the ethical development and use of AI in weaponry, which could lead to
    unintended escalations and destabilization,

    Recognizing the need for a multilateral approach to address the ethical and legal
    challenges posed using AI in military applications,

    Acknowledging the importance of transparency and accountability in the development


    and deployment of AI in military contexts,

    Recognizing the potential benefits of AI in improving the precision and effectiveness of


    military operations, while also emphasizing the need for responsible use,

    Encouraging member states to collaborate on establishing international norms and


    standards to govern the development and use of AI in weaponry,

    1) Calls upon Member States to develop and adopt a comprehensive international


    framework that governs the ethical development, deployment, and use of AI in
    weaponry, considering the following principles:
    a) Accountability: Ensuring that humans retain ultimate control and accountability over
    the deployment and use of AI-enabled weaponry,
    b) Transparency: Promoting transparency in the development and deployment of AI in
    military applications, including clear communication of the capabilities and limitations of
    such technologies,
    c) Non-proliferation: Encouraging measures to prevent the proliferation of AI-based
    weaponry to non-state actors and terrorist organizations;

    Saipem Classification - General


    Use
    2) Urges all member states to establish national and international oversight bodies with
    respect to previous conventions responsible for monitoring the development and use of
    AI in weaponry, with the mandate to:
    a). Monitor the ethical implications of AI in weaponry and recommend adjustments to
    existing frameworks as necessary,
    b) Facilitate dialogue and cooperation among Member States, the private sector,
    academies, and civil society on best practices and emerging challenges such as the
    development of LAWS;

    3) Recommends the establishment of an UN-led International development society on AI


    Weaponry (IDCAI), tasked with:
    a) Conducting research on the ethical, legal, and security implications of AI in
    weaponry,
    b) Developing guidelines and best practices for the responsible development and use
    of AI in military applications,
    c) Providing technical assistance and capacity-building support to Member States in
    developing national frameworks aligned with international standards;

    4) Encourages member states to collaborate on updating existing international laws, such


    as the Geneva Conventions and the CDUL, to address the unique challenges posed by AI
    in weaponry;

    5) Proposes the inclusion of ethical AI training in military education programs to ensure


    that military personnel understand the implications of using AI in warfare;

    6) Recommends the development of systems that require human authorization before


    AI can engage in lethal actions;

    Saipem Classification - General


    Use
    7) Recommends the initiation of public dialogues to educate and engage citizens on the
    ethical implications of AI in weaponry;

    8) Stresses the importance of compliance with the Law of Armed Conflict by ensuring
    that any autonomous weapons system must be capable of distinguishing between
    combatants and noncombatants, thereby minimizing harm to civilian populations;

    9) Recommends the establishment of the International AI Commission of Weapon


    Systems (IAICWS) to oversee compliance with these standards;

    10) Invites all nations to ratify the Comprehensive Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems
    Organization (CLAWSO) to develop and implement measures ensuring transparency and
    accountability in the use of LAWS, potentially merging its functions with those of the
    IAICWS to streamline international efforts while agreeing to an internationally agreed
    definition for LAWS with respect to the CDUL;
    11) Stating the definition and uses of LAWS:
    a) LAWS which are also known as Lethal autonomous weapon systems are the
    latest development in Ai weaponry and these autonomous weapons that can
    target and apply offence without any human oversight and have machine
    learning technology which enables them to learn from their past errors,
    b) These weapons can be used in the place of human soldiers and other kinds of
    weaponry as they are believed to be more efficient and are said to be more
    ethical as this is said to result in decrease of death toll by some degree;

    12) Urges all countries to support regulation of using and developing LAWS;

    13) Recommends creating a code of ethics as it outlines the values and principles that AI
    systems should follow;

    14) Proposes the ‘Accountability of misuse of conventional weapons protocol’ which


    aims to:

    Saipem Classification - General


    Use
    a) In the case of human causalities or violation of the CCW, thus this protocol aims to
    fine a penalty or having their head of state be questioned by international investigating
    bodies,
    b) This protocol will also include ‘The prevention of misuse of autonomous weapon’
    clause which prevents the misuse of autonomous weapons with respect to the CDUL and
    also that the states need to send the data of LAWS development;

    15) Recommends an international regulatory body to be established following the


    developments of LAWS and keep monitoring developments while ensuring that human
    oversight gets implemented in autonomous weapons;

    16) Further proposes the addition of Humane decision accountability license (HDAL)
    which needs to tested in autonomous weapons to see if they have Human decision
    making capability with human oversight and all developed autonomous weapons need to
    be certified with the HDAL;

    17) Further requests all member states to have an official autonomous weapon testing
    grounds or the Autonomous weapon testing office (AWTO) which can confirm whether
    an autonomous weapon can be certified.

    Saipem Classification - General


    Use

    You might also like