UiTM CAMPUS SERI ISKANDAR

FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING & SURVEYING

BUILDING SURVEYING PRACTICE

ASSIGNMENT 2

CODE:
BST205

CLASS:
CFAP1193D

TITLE:
BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENT

PREPARED FOR:
NOORAZLINA BINTI KAMARULZAMAN
DR

GROUPMATE:

NO. NAME STUDENT ID

1. MUHAMMAD NAJMI BIN NOR AMALI 2022836928

2. MUHAMMAD HAFIZUL HAZIQ BIN MOHD NAZRI 2022647186

3. MUHAMMAD MUIEZUDDIN BIN MAZLAN 2022489782

4. NURUL NAJWA BINTI ANUAR 2022620642

TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................. 2

PART A : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................... 3
1.0 PROPERTY INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 3
2.0 TERM OF REFERENCE .............................................................................................. 6
3.0 LIMITATION OF INSPECTION ................................................................................. 7
4.0 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION ...................................................................... 8
4.1 BUILDING ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM (BARIS) FOR SURAU
TAMAN ISKANDAR BISTARI.................................................................................. 9
5.0 SURVEYOR DECLARATION .................................................................................. 10
6.0 SURVEYOR COMPETENCY.................................................................................... 11
PART B : MAIN REPORT ...................................................................................................... 15
7.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 15
8.0 DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES/ASSET .................................................................... 16
9.0 METHOD OF INSPECTION ...................................................................................... 17
10.0 BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY ........................................................................ 18
10.1 EXTERNAL/SITE CONDITION ....................................................................... 18
10.2 INTERNAL AREA............................................................................................. 18
11.0 DEFECT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 19
12.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION......................................................... 20
PART C : APPENDICES ......................................................................................................... 21
13.0 LOCATION AND SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 21
14.0 AS BUILT DRAWING - BUILDING PLAN ........................................................... 22
15.0 DEFECT SHEET....................................................................................................... 23
16.0 DEFECT INDICATION PLAN ................................................................................ 24
PART A : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROPERTY INFORMATION
GENERAL
NO DESCRIPTION
INFORMATION

1. i. Owner’s name
ii. Address

Figure 1: Surau Taman Iskandar Bistari

i. Since it was built on a community site, this

surau actually has no owner. Instead, it has a
representative named Hj Azshar bin Hj Ab
Rahman.

ii. Persiaran Iskandar Bestari, 32600 Seri

Iskandar, Perak

2. i. Building status i. Prayer area

(function)
ii. Tenure ii. Freehold tenure
iii. Occupancy
iii. Can be occupied up to 50 people in this
building
3. i. No. of storey height i. One storey surau

4. i. Year of built i. March 2003

ii. Cost of built ii. RM 200,000

5. i. Maintenance Due to the presentive there no maintenance schedule

for surau but the community take and initiatives to
information
do an activity which is “gotong-royong” three
months once.

6. i. Site location

Figure 2: Showing location plan of the case study

7. i. Front Elevation
ii. Left Elevation
iii. Rear Elevation

Figure 3: Front Elevation

 Figure 4: Left Elevation

Figure 5: Rear Elevation from As built plan

2.0 TERM OF REFERENCE
NO. ITEM DETAILS
1.
The purpose and Scope of Work There are several reason the inspection of the building
which are assessing condition of building, identify
any defects that require maintenance, and
documentation for future reference.
2.
Inspection Date 22 May 2024, 12 May 2024 and 27 June 2024
3.
Report Submission Date 3 July 2024
4. None
Specialist Inspection Required
5.
Insurance Detail None
6. None
Dispute Procedure
7.
Payment Method  Get an invoice from the building inspector or a
request for payment.
 Approve the invoice or payment request by hand.
 In the accounts payable module, enter the invoice
details.
 Examine the details on the invoice.
 If the purchase order and the invoice match:
 Complete the purchase order online match and
accept the bill online.
 Examine the gold system invoice and take the
necessary action.
 When the batch payment run is completed by the
central office, checks are issued for invoices that
have been approved.
8.
Limitations  Roof (Inaccessible)
 Water Tank (Inaccessible)
 Foundation (Unreachable)
 Manhole (Hazardous)
9.
Environmental Issues None
10.
Hazardous Materials None
3.0 LIMITATION OF INSPECTION
NO. LIMITATION AREA DESCRIPTION
1.
A valid reason why a rooftop can be a limitation
during an inspection is safety concerns. Inspecting
rooftops often involves working at heights, which
poses significant risks to the safety of the
inspector. Without proper safety equipment and
training, accessing and evaluating the condition of
a rooftop can be hazardous, making it a limitation
for thorough and safe inspection processes.
Figure 6: Rooftop
2.
A water tank can be a limitation in an inspection
due to restricted access, which makes it
challenging to thoroughly assess its internal
condition and making it difficult to spot internal
issues like corrosion or sediment buildup.

Figure 7: Water Tank

3.
A manhole can limit inspection because it is hard
to access. The confined space inside a manhole
can be difficult and dangerous to enter, making it
challenging for inspectors to thoroughly assess the
area. This often requires special equipment and
trained personnel, which can complicate and slow
down the inspection process.
Figure 8: Manhoke
4.
The foundation is a limitation for inspections
because it is mostly underground and hidden.
Inspectors can't see all of it without digging, which
they don't do. Special tools are needed for a
thorough check, and problems might be hidden.
This makes it hard to fully assess the foundation
during a regular inspection.

Figure 9: Foundation from As built Plan

4.0 FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION
 4.1 BUILDING ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM (BARIS) FOR SURAU TAMAN ISKANDAR BISTARI
Schedule of Building Condition

BARIS
ELEMENT/ AREA/ DEFECT
NO LEVEL DEFECT CONDITION PRIORITY MATRIX
COMPONENT LOCATION SHEET NO. /
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
INDICATION
(A) (B) ©
CODE
5.0 SURVEYOR DECLARATION

DECLARATION OF INSPECTION

Surau Taman Iskandar Bistrari

Building Address: Persiaran Iskandar Bestari, 32600, Seri Iskandar Perak
Owner/Client. Mohd Suhail Bin Hj Mohad Ali

It is hereby I testify that the building has been inspected on 22th May 2024, …. to inspect and
certify that the condition level of the building as marked and described below, and its
assessment rating is stated in this declaration.

1. Good-very few minor defects

2. Fair-needs repair & organized maintenance
3. Dilapidated-needs more replacement & repair works

Comments (if any):-

Signature :
Name :MUHAMMAD NAJMI BIN NOR AMALI
NRIC :040402-01-1359
ISM/Practive no. :ISM/H009
Name of consultant company :

Date : 12 Jun 2024 Stamp :

Important notes: condition of the building as written in this document is based on the visual
inspection done and as reported in this document. Other undetected/unreported defects due to
obstructions, hidden, no allowable access or has occurred by whatever means after this report
was signed is not covered within this scope of inspection works.
6.0 SURVEYOR COMPETENCY
PART B : MAIN REPORT
7.0 INTRODUCTION
8.0 DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES/ASSET
9.0 METHOD OF INSPECTION
10.0 BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY

10.1 EXTERNAL/SITE CONDITION

10.2 INTERNAL AREA

11.0 DEFECT ANALYSIS
12.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
PART C : APPENDICES

13.0 LOCATION AND SITE PLAN

14.0 AS BUILT DRAWING - BUILDING PLAN
15.0 DEFECT SHEET
16.0 DEFECT INDICATION PLAN