Full Download The Sanusi of Cyrenaica 1949 E2008 E.E. Evans-Pritchard PDF
Full Download The Sanusi of Cyrenaica 1949 E2008 E.E. Evans-Pritchard PDF
Full Download The Sanusi of Cyrenaica 1949 E2008 E.E. Evans-Pritchard PDF
com
https://ebookname.com/product/the-sanusi-of-
cyrenaica-1949-e2008-e-e-evans-pritchard/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookname.com/product/social-anthropology-e-e-evans-
pritchard/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-encyclopedia-of-suicide-2nd-
edition-glen-evans/
https://ebookname.com/product/the-project-management-
communications-toolkit-second-edition-carl-l-pritchard/
https://ebookname.com/product/a-companion-to-north-africa-in-
antiquity-1st-edition-bruce-hitchner-editor/
Case Studies in Asian Management 1st Edition Parissa
Haghirian
https://ebookname.com/product/case-studies-in-asian-
management-1st-edition-parissa-haghirian/
https://ebookname.com/product/syria-s-peasantry-the-descendants-
of-its-lesser-rural-notables-and-their-politics-hanna-batatu/
https://ebookname.com/product/respecting-toleration-traditional-
liberalism-and-contemporary-diversity-first-edition-balint/
https://ebookname.com/product/evaluating-welfare-reform-in-an-
era-of-transition-michele-ver-ploeg/
https://ebookname.com/product/an-introduction-to-labor-law-third-
edition-by-michael-evan-gold/
The Socialist Alternative to Bolshevik Russia The
Socialist Revolutionary Party 1921 39 1st Edition
Elizabeth White
https://ebookname.com/product/the-socialist-alternative-to-
bolshevik-russia-the-socialist-revolutionary-party-1921-39-1st-
edition-elizabeth-white/
THE SANUSI
OF CYRENAICA
BY
E. E. E V A N S -P R IT C H A R D
PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY
AND FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE
IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
OXFORD
AT TH E CLARENDON PRESS
Oxford University Press, Amen House, London E .C .4
GLASGOW NEW YORK TORONTO MELBOURNE WELLINGTON
BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI CAPE TOWN IBADAN
which the Italians commemorated persons who for the most part
might well be forgotten. To aid the reader I have listed at the
end of the book the chief place-names mentioned in the text
with their Italian equivalents. It will be observed that the
Italian way of writing Arabic words is different from our w a y :
where we write Suluq, Tubruq, Banghazi, and Jaghbub, they
write Soluch, Tobruch, Bengasi, and Giarabub.
I have cut the book to half its original size and have con
sequently been compelled to omit a mass of detail. I have also
restricted references to quotations and to statements which seem
particularly to require the citation of an authority. Much of the
omitted detail and many of the deleted references will be found
in various articles and papers I have published on the Sanusi
elsewhere. In a few instances I have not been able to check
references because the books cited are unobtainable in England.
I acknowledge the generous help of many British and Arab
friends, especially of Major-General D. C. Gumming, Muhammad
Shafiq Effendi Hamza, and the warm-hearted companion of my
travels Salih bu 'Abd al-Salam.
I thank Mr. E. L. Peters and Miss Sonya Gregory for help
in preparation of the maps.
E. E. E.-P.
OXFORD
April 1948
CONTENTS
LIST OF PLATES ................................................................. v i a
III. T H E S A N U S I Y A A N D T H E T R I B E S , . . . 62
I V. T H E T U R K I S H A D M I N I S T R A T I O N . . . 90
V. T H E F I R S T IT A L O -S A N U S I W A R (1911-17) . 104
V I. T H E P E R IO D O F T H E A C C O R D S (1917-23) . 134
V I II . I T A L I A N R U L E A N D C O L O N IZ A T IO N (1932-42) . 191
A P P E N D IX E S :
(1) Cyrenaican Place-names F requently Mentioned
IN THE T ext . . . . . . 230
(2) Select B ibliography . . . . . 232
I N D E X ................................................................................. 235
LIST OF PLATES
(1) The Tom b of the Grand Sanusi (Hasanain Pasha) Facing page i6
{From a photograph by A . M . Hassanein Bey, by
permission o f the Royal Geographical Society,)
MAPS
The Spread of the Sanusiya in North Africa . . . 15
Rainfall and the plateau area (from Italian sources); Climatic zones
(from Italian sources) . . . . . .3 0
II
The Grand Sanusi's desire to create around him a society
living the life of primitive Islam and his missionary zeal gave an
impression, enhanced by the austerity of his Bedouin followers
and the remoteness of the Sahara, of excessive puritanism and
fanaticism; and some writers have compared the Sanusi move
ment to the Wahhabi movement on account of these supposed
traits. Duveyrier's account,^ used very uncritically by other
writers, is largely to be blamed for the exaggerated stories of
the secrecy, puritanism, fanaticism, power, and numbers of
the Order that were current at the end of the last century and
in the first decade of the present century and which much
prejudiced it in the eyes of European Powers with interests in
North Africa. With Duveyrier it was an axiom that any fool
hardy European who got himself killed in North and Central
Africa had been assassinated by Sanusi agents and that any
setback to French interests was due to their propaganda.
It is true that the Grand Sanusi, like the founder of the
Wahhabi movement, aimed at restoring what he conceived to
be the original society of the Prophet. Neither was peculiar in
doing so, for every Muslim preacher must have the same aim.
The Grand Sanusi forbad the drinking of alcohol and the taking
of snuff and at first, though not absolutely, smoking. But all
Muslims are forbidden alcohol and many who are neither
Sanusi nor Wahhabi think that smoking is best avoided. It is
untrue, as has been asserted, that the Sanusi are forbidden
coffee. The Bedouin of Libya do not drink coffee, only tea, in
* H. Duveyrier, La Confrerie Musulmane de Sidi Mohammed hen *AU es
Senotht et son Domaine giographique en VAnnie 1300 de VHigire — 1883 de
noire 1884.
ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA 7
praise of which many poems have been written by Brothers of
the Order. The Grand Samisi forbad music, dancing, and sing
ing in the recitations of the Order, but in this he was at one with
all the official spokesmen of Islam. Most reformist movements
in Islam tend towards asceticism.
Far from being extreme ascetics, however, the Sanusi
Brothers eat and dress well, even using scent, and are amiable
and merry companions. The Tunisian scholar and traveller
Muhammad 'Uthman al-Hashaishi, who travelled in 1896 via
Malta, Tripoli, and Banghazi to Kufra to visit al-Sayyid al-
Mahdi and met the leading Brothers of the time, remarks that
'they are fond of diversions, honest jesting. I have visited
many of their zawiyas and I have made the acquaintance of
many of their notables: I have seen only cheerful and smiling
faces, welcoming me with benevolence and kindness. May God
reward them!'*
The Grand Sanusi discouraged the trappings of poverty by
his example, his exhortations, and his insistence on the Brothers
being self-supporting. Although the Heads of the Sanusiya
Order, like the. Wahhabi leaders, encouraged settlement on the
land, they can hardly have hoped to have greatly influenced
the Bedouin to this end; but they insisted on the lodges of
the Order supporting themselves by agriculture supplemented
by stock-raising, and thereby took a stand against ittikaly the
dependence for livelihood on alms and not on labour which
some mendicant Orders have advocated.
The Order has always been, in fact, conventional as well as
orthodox. In its early period it was essentially a missionary
Order with the limited aim of bringing by peaceful persuasion
the Bedouin Arabs and the peoples of the Sahara and the Sudan
to a fuller understanding of the beliefs and morals of Islam,
while giving them at the same time the blessings of civilization:
justice, peace, trade, and education. Its principles were, as
Shaikh Muhammad 'Uthman says, simply 'to do good and
avoid evir.^
The accusation of fanaticism is not borne out by either the
character of the Bedouin adherents of the Order or by its actions.
* Mohammed ben Otsmane el-Hachaichi, Voyage au Pays des Senoussia d
travers La Tripolitaine et les Pays Touareg, 1912, p. 128 (ist ed., 1903)-
* Ibid., p. 86.
8 ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA
The desire to establish in North Africa conditions in which
Muslims might live by their own laws and under their own
government, as they did in Arabia under the first four Caliphs,
led the Grand Sanusi and his successors to oppose the Turkish
way of life and the influences and innovations of Western
Christendom, but their intransigence in these matters did not
imply intolerance, far less aggressiveness. Though some
writers have made assertions to the contrary, the Sanusi have
never shown themselves more hostile than other Muslims to
Christians and Jews, and the Grand Sanusi and Sayyid al-
Mahdi scrupulously avoided all political entanglements which
might bring them into unfriendly relations with neighbouring
States and the European Powers. The Brothers of the Order
were discouraged from discussing political questions. Nor were
the Sanusi intolerant towards fellow Muslims who differed from
them. Shaikh Muhammed ‘Uthman records of Sayyid al-Mahdi
that *the persons he dislikes the most are those who speak ill
of Muslims The leaders of the Sanusiya have always tolerated
other and rival Orders, even when they have disapproved of
their rites. The Grand Sanusi had himself been a member of a
succession of Orders before he started his own and he allowed,
as his successors have done, members of other Orders to belong
to the Sanusiya at the same time.
The leaders of the Order have also been tolerant towards the
cult of saints, unlike the iconoclastic Wahhabi, who have
destroyed even the tombs of those nearest to the Prophet him
self. The view held by the doctors of orthodox Islam is that,
though intercession through a saint is unlawful and the only
mention of him during prayers at his tomb should be to ask the
mercy of God on his soul, it is permissible to show respect to his
tomb and his memory. The heads of the Sanusiya have, how
ever, always tolerated among their Bedouin followers a regard
for holy men and their tombs which goes beyond mere respect.
It is unlikely that they felt any repugnance to the cult, because
they counted among their forbears several saints and were
themselves brought up in North Africa where the cult of saints
is widespread and very near to the hearts of the common people;
and they could not have remonstrated with the Bedouin for
believing that holy men and their tombs are sources of barakay
* Op, cit., p. I2I.
ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA 9
divine blessing, since it was because the Bedouin believed the
Sanusi family had the same virtue that they accepted their
leadership.
The resemblance often alleged between the Sanusi and the
Wahhabi movements, on the grounds of like puritanism,
literalism, and fanaticism, cannot be substantiated. It is
obvious that there must be resemblances between new religious
movements: they usually claim to be a return to primitive
faith and morals and they are generally missionary and enthusi
astic. There is no great significance in such common character
istics of the two movements. Nor is there any reason to suppose
that the Grand Sanusi was directly influenced by Wahhabi
propaganda. A more significant comparison between the two
might be made by tracing their developments from religious
into political movements. Both started as religious revivals
among backward peoples, chiefly Bedouin, the Wahhabi move
ment in the Najd in the eighteenth century and the Sanusi
movement first in the Hijaz and then in Cyrenaica in the middle
of the nineteenth century; the Ikhwan organizations of the two
movements have much in common; and both ended in the
formation of Amirates, or small Islamic States.
Both movements have created States, the Wahhabi in Arabia
and the Sanusi in Cyrenaica, based explicitly on religious
particularism. In doing so they have only done what any move
ment of the kind is bound to do in a barbarous country if it is
to continue to exist, namely, to create an administrative system
which would ensure a measure of peace, security, justice, and
economic stability. A religious organization cannot exist apart
from a polity of a wider kind. But they did not create the senti
ment of community which made the growth of governmental
functions and the emergence of a State possible.
Religious divisions in Islam have commonly been the expres
sion of a sense of social and cultural exclusiveness. The support
given to the 'Alids in Persia and Arabia, to the Umayyads in
Africa and Spain, to the Fatimids in Egypt, to the Kharijites
by the Berbers in North Africa, and the adoption of extreme
Shi'ite doctrines by the mountaineers of Syria and by the Kurds,
and of Isma'ili teachings in parts of India, were all reactions
against foreign domination as much as revolts against orthodoxy.
The religious deviation was the expression of the intense desire
10 ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA
of a people to live according to their own traditions and institu
tions. To-day this desire is expressed in the political language
of nationalism. In the past it was expressed in religious move
ments. Arab nationalism is not a new phenomenon. Only its
dress is new.
As will be seen in the chapters which follow, conditions in
Cyrenaica were particularly favourable to the growth of a
politico-religious movement such as the Sanusiya became. It
was cut off by deserts from neighbouring countries, it had a
homogeneous population, it had a tribal system which em
braced common traditions and a strong feeling of community
of blood, the country was not dominated by the towns, and the
Turkish administration exercised very little control over the
interior. It was, as will be seen, the tribal system of the Bedouin
which furnished the Order with its political foundations just as
it was the tribesmen of the country whose hardiness and courage
enabled it to stand up to the succession of defeats it had to
endure.
The reasons for the political success of the Sanusiya Order in
Cyrenaica will appear in the course of this account, and here I
wish to draw attention to one of them only. It has been said
that its rites and teachings were, like the Bedouin character,
austere without being fanatical, and that it tolerated the cult
of saints to which the Bedouin were accustomed, the Grand
Sanusi becoming, in fact, a kind of national saint; but it must
be added that the acceptability of its teachings and the fact
that the Grand Sanusi could at once be placed by the Bedouin
in the familiar category of MaraUin, holy men coming to
preach and settle in Cyrenaica from the west, cannot alone
account for the remarkable success of the Sanusiya movement.
The Bedouin of Cyrenaica had heard similar teachings before
from similar teachers and had paid them the same degree
of attention as they paid to the Grand Sanusi, but these
earlier missionaries won only a personal and local following for
themselves and their descendants, whereas the Grand Sanusi
established himself and his family as leaders of a national
movement, a position they have now held for three generations.
Leaving aside the remarkable personality of the Grand Sanusi
and without here discussing whether the time at which he
taught was particularly favourable to the growth of the move
ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA ii
ment to which his teachings led, it may be said that the great
difference between the Grand Sanusi and the earlier holy men
whose tombs are homely landmarks all over Cyrenaica was that,
while they were, all of them, in the eyes of the Bedouin, Mara
bouts, the Grand Sanusi was also the head of an Order which
gave to him and his successors an organization. Moreover,
unlike the Heads of most Islamic Orders, which have rapidly
disintegrated into autonomous segments without contact and
common direction, they have been able to maintain this organiza
tion intact and keep control of it. This they were able to do by
co-ordinating the lodges of the Order to the tribal structure.
Ill
The more recent Islamic Orders are to be found principally
in North and West Africa. The Sanusiya is one of the most
recent of them. Its founder was an Algerian scholar, al-Sayyid
Muhammad bin 'Ah al-Sanusi al-Khattabi al-Idrisi al-Hasani,
a very remarkable man, mystic, missionary, and Marabout.
The Sayyid Muhammad bin 'Ali al-Sanusi is usually spoken of
in Cyrenaica as al-Sanusi al-Kabir, the Grand Sanusi, and I
generally refer to him thus in this book.
The Grand Sanusi was born of a distinguished family of
Sharifs at a village near Mustaghanim in Algeria about 1787.
Early in life he became noted for his intelligence, piety, and
profound learning, considered fitting ornaments to his noble
birth. He studied first at Mustaghanim, then at Mazun, and
later at the famous mosque school at Fez in Morocco, where he
learnt theology, jurisprudence, exegesis of the Koran, and the
other usual subjects of a Muslim student of the time. There he
seems to have developed an interest in mysticism, having come
under the influence of the Moroccan Order of the Tijaniya
Darwishes. He left Fez when in the early thirties in order to
make the pilgrimage to Mecca, though a Turkish biographer
says that one of his reasons for leaving Morocco was to avoid
possible unpleasantness with the authorities, who were alarmed
lest his propaganda for the greater unity of Islam, his life's aim,
might have political consequences.^ They had small cause for
alarm as his efforts seem to have made little impression on the
* Salim bin *Amir, Majallat 'Umar aUMukhtar, No. II, 1943--4, P- 2.
12 ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA
people of Fez, but, if the story is true, the suspicion of those in
authority would have been his first experience of the kind of
opposition he was later to encounter in Cairo and Mecca.
He went from Fez to southern Algeria and thence to Qabis,
Tripoli, Misurata, and Banghazi, preaching ever3rwhere on his
way. He had already gathered around him his first disciples
{Ikhwan)y mostly Algerians, and in their company he made his
way to Egypt by the coastal route from Banghazi and stayed
there a few weeks. He had intended to study at al-Azhar, but
he seems to have aroused the jealousy of the Shaikhs of the
University and to have irritated them by his reforming zeal and
his speculations, and so departed for Mecca. Short though his
stay in Cairo had been it is probable that the independence of
the Khedive Muhammad 'Ali and the cultural and intellectual
revival going on there left their mark on his mind.^
He remained in the Hijaz for about six years, studying under
a number of Shaikhs at Mecca and al-Madina. He is said to
have returned to Mustaghanim in about 1829 and not to have
visited the Hijaz again till 1833. On this second visit, which
lasted for eight years, he was accompanied by a considerable
number of disciples from the west. He continued his reformist
agitation and his studies under learned Shaikhs at Mecca. The
man who influenced him most, and whose favourite pupil he
became, was Sayyid Ahmad bin Idris al-Fasi, the fourth Head
of the Moroccan Order of the Khadiriya or Khidriya Darwishes,
a branch of the Shadhiliya Order, and later the founder of a
new sub-Order of his own, the Idrisiya or Khadiriya-Idrisiya.
Sayyid Ahmad Idris had aroused the hostility of the doctors
of the Maliki rite at Mecca, by whom he was regarded as un
orthodox, and went into exile into the Yaman, where he was
accompanied for two years by the Grand Sanusi. On Sayyid
Ahmad Idris's death in the Yaman, his two chief disciples
organized his followers into two new sub-Orders, the Mirghaniya
and the Sanusiya, the latter being organized and led by the
Grand Sanusi, who established its headquarters at Mt. Abu
Qubais, near Mecca, in 1837. This year is regarded as the official
date of the foundation of the Order.
It will have been noted that the Grand Sanusi was influenced
by a wide range of Sufi tradition and had affiliated himself to a
* Salim bin *Amir, Majallat *Umar al-Mukhtar, No. I, p. 12.
ORIGIN AND EXPANSION OF THE SANUSIYA 13
number of Orders before he founded his own. It has been
recorded that he was influenced by the Moroccan Tijaniya
Order and that at Mecca he became the favourite pupil of the
founder of the Idrisiya Order, which derived its tenets from
the basic Shadhiliya Order. In his student days he became a
member of other Orders: Shadhiliya, Nasiriya, Qadariya, and
perhaps others.^ His Catholicism was not peculiar among the
Sufis, and in his case he seems to have joined a large variety of
Orders with the deliberate intention of learning their rites and
doctrines at first hand so that he could combine all that was
best in each of them in a new Order which would be the crown
of Sufi thought and practice. It must not be supposed that on
this account his teaching was a mere amalgam of the tenets of
earlier Orders. Original it was not, but it was a consistent and
carefully thought out way of life.^
The new Sanusiya Order made such rapid progress, especially
among the Bedouin of the Hijaz,^ that it excited the jealousy
and fear of the various authorities in Mecca, the 'Ulama, the
Sharifs, and the Turkish Administration. There can be little
doubt that the real obj ections to the Order were that it threatened
the prestige and privileges of these authorities, but they were
framed in less revealing language. It seems to have been held
against the Order that it lowered Sufi standards to accommodate
itself to Bedouin laxity in religious matters, and that it verged
on heresy.
Faced with serious opposition the Grand Sanusi did what his
teacher Sayyid Ahmad Idris had done in similar circumstances:
he left the Hijaz, in about 1841, accompanied by many of his
disciples, to return to his native land. After spending some
months in Cairo, he continued his journey westwards to Siwa
oasis, where.he was taken sick and spent several weeks recuperat
ing and instructing the people of the oasis in the faith. In the
following year he reached Tripoli by the desert route. On his
way to Qabis from that town he heard of the new French
advances in his homeland and decided in view of them to return
to Tripoli and thence to Banghazi. It would appear therefore*
Scale
§ \ Sa'ukna Ja«/IBK)
Saukna Ja|u ^6)
I \ F E Z Z A N “ (legs) E G Y P T
\ y
^ 1. . /—
Kawar
i
ANGLO
KANEM ENNEDI EGYPTI
r g v p t t ;AN
FRENCH 5UDAN
$A H A R A CHAO
WAOAI
DARFUR
IV
When the Grand Sanusi died his two surviving sons, ai-
Say3ud Muhammad al-Mahdi and al-Sayyid Muhammad al-
Sharif, were minors, so a regency of ten Shaikhs was appointed
to control the affairs of the Order till the elder, Muhammad
al-Mahdi, was old enough to take over their direction. When he
did so he dealt primarily with the general affairs of the Order,
leaving religious instruction in the hands of his brother.
The Grand Sanusi had been typical of the great itinerant
teachers of his day: international in outlook and intent on the
pursuit of holiness and learning rather than guided by secular
distractions and ambitions. Mecca was the centre of his world
and to it he tended always to gravitate. The Sayyid al-Mahdi
was more definitely a Cyrenaican. Bom in 1844 in a cave at
Massa, near the Cyrenaican Mother Lodge of al-Baida, he was
brought up among the religious families of the country and
among the Bedouin. He studied under his father, the emdite
Moroccan Sidi Ahmad al-Rifi, Sidi 'Ali bin 'abd al-Maula, Sidi
‘Umran bin Baraka, and others of his father's circle of pupil-
al-Sayyid Muhammad bin *Ali al-Sanusi
(1787-1859)
[119] Cf. “Vous vous tuez com fait le pellicant.” E. Deschamps, V. 33.
[120] Evidently Gerson: “Tractatus contra Romantium de Rosa.” See
above.
[121] This of course, did happen. Cf. Introduction.
[122] Bertrand du Guesclin, the famous Constable of France. Cf.
Chronique du Bertrand du Guesclin by the trouvère Cuvelier pub.
by E. Charrière, Paris 1839 (Siméon Luce).
[123] Morise de Trisguidi, whose dates I have been unable to find,
was a Breton companion-in-arms of Du Guesclin. He is mentioned
in A. Le Moyne de la Borderie, Histoire de Bretagne, Rennes, 1906
(cf. iii. 517 and iv. 28) as having been a squire at the celebrated
Combat of the Thirty. We have the following reference to him in the
Mandements et Actes Divers de Charles V. (Léopold Delisle, Paris,
1874) p. 896. “... Morise de Trezeguidi, chevalier, capitaine de
Hembont en Bretaigne, au nombre de vint et cinq hommes d’armes,
et soixante dix frans pour son estat par moys,” which reference to
the garrisoning of Brittany for the King shows that de Trisguidi had
risen in rank, and was a trusted defender of the Crown.
[124] (“Ne vous vueil, etc.”) cf. Michel, Roman de la Rose, t. 2, p. 74.
XIV.
PIERRE COL’S REJOINDER TO THE FOREGOING.
(Fragment)
Epistola LIV.
Ad quemdam causidicum[130]
Petit ut ea quae adversus Johannem de Magduno dixerat
retractet
Epistola LVI.
Ad quemdam amicum[132]
Hortatur ut Johannis de Magduno librum, quem quam
plures damnabant doctores, defendat.
NOTE
Epistola LVII.
Ad quemdam anonymum.[133]
Ut retractet ea quæ de Johanne de Magduno dixerat.
NOTE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Prefatory Note.
2
I. INTRODUCTION. 3
II. MANUSCRIPTS. 10
III. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 12
IV. THE DOCUMENTS. 16
I. “Epistre au Dieu d’Amours” of Christine
De Pizan. 16
II. “Dit de la Rose” of Christine. 16
III. The Treatise of Jean de Montreuil. 16
IV. Christine to Jean de Montreuil. 17
V. Gontier Col to Christine, Asking for a Copy
of No. IV. 29
VI. Gontier Col to Christine, Reproving Her 30
For Her Attitude Towards the Roman
de la Rose.
VII. Christine’s Reply to No. VI. 32
VIII. Christine’s Dedicatory Epistle to the
Queen of France. 34
IX. Christine’s Dedicatory Epistle to Guillaume
de Tignonville. 35
X. Gerson’s Tractatus. 38
XI. Pierre Col’s Letter Replying to Christine
and to Gerson. 56
XII. Gerson’s Reply to Pierre Col. 77
XIII. Christine’s Reply to Pierre Col. 83
XIV. Pierre Col’s Rejoinder to the Foregoing. 112
APPENDIX.
114
Epistola LIV. 114
Epistola LVI. 115
Epistola LVII. 116
Transcriber's Notes
Textual notes in the original are not numbered but start with the
line number and the word(s) to which they apply, such as
4. Treschier sire] wanting F.
indicating that those words do not appear in manuscript F. In the
transcription the line numbers have been placed in square brackets
and the pertinent word(s) in round brackets:
[l. 4] (treschier sire) wanting F.
All notes have been placed at the end of each document. In a
few places the order of the notes has been silently corrected.
Where appropriate, punctuation and French accents have been
silently corrected, and in a few places italics have been silently
adjusted. Also, confusions between u and v and between f and s in
the French texts have been silently corrected.
Spelling variations such as œuure/oeuure/euure have not been
harmonized, but obvious typographical errors have been corrected.
Such corrections in the text are underlined with blue dots. When
placing the cursor on such words the original text appears.
A table of contents has been added.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EPISTLES ON THE
ROMANCE OF THE ROSE, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN THE DEBATE
***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the
terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation
makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any
work in any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method
you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has
agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be
paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or
are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address
specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™
License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and
discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project
Gutenberg™ works.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.