Multiplication
Multiplication
Search Wikipedia
Search
Donate
Create account
Log in
Contents hide
(Top)
Notation
Definitions
Computation
Products of measurements
Product of a sequence
Exponentiation
Properties
Axioms
Calculator
See also
References
Further reading
External links
Multiplication
Article
Talk
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Appearance hide
Text
Small
Standard
Large
Width
Standard
Wide
Color (beta)
Automatic
Light
Dark
This article is about the mathematical operation. For other uses, see Multiplication
(disambiguation).
"⋅" redirects here. For the symbol, see Interpunct § In mathematics and science.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding
citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Multiplication" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2012) (Learn
how and when to remove this message)
Four bags with three marbles per bag gives twelve marbles (4 × 3 = 12).
Multiplication can also be thought of as scaling. Here, 2 is being multiplied by 3 using scaling,
giving 6 as a result.
× 2
= 11
Multiplication (often denoted by the cross symbol ×, by the mid-line dot operator ⋅, by
juxtaposition, or, on computers, by an asterisk *) is one of the four elementary mathematical
operations of arithmetic, with the other ones being addition, subtraction, and division. The
result of a multiplication operation is called a product.
The multiplication of whole numbers may be thought of as repeated addition; that is, the
multiplication of two numbers is equivalent to adding as many copies of one of them, the
multiplicand, as the quantity of the other one, the multiplier; both numbers can be referred to
as factors.
⋯
+
⏟
a
times
{\displaystyle 3\times 4}, phrased as "3 times 4" or "3 multiplied by 4", can be evaluated by
adding 3 copies of 4 together:
4
+
12.
Here, 3 (the multiplier) and 4 (the multiplicand) are the factors, and 12 is the product.
One of the main properties of multiplication is the commutative property, which states in this
case that adding 3 copies of 4 gives the same result as adding 4 copies of 3:
12.
Thus, the designation of multiplier and multiplicand does not affect the result of the
multiplication.[1] [2]
The product of two measurements (or physical quantities) is a new type of measurement,
usually with a derived unit. For example, multiplying the lengths (in meters or feet) of the two
sides of a rectangle gives its area (in square meters or square feet). Such a product is the
subject of dimensional analysis.
The inverse operation of multiplication is division. For example, since 4 multiplied by 3 equals
12, 12 divided by 3 equals 4. Indeed, multiplication by 3, followed by division by 3, yields the
original number. The division of a number other than 0 by itself equals 1.
Several mathematical concepts expand upon the fundamental idea of multiplication. The
product of a sequence, vector multiplication, complex numbers, and matrices are all examples
where this can be seen. These more advanced constructs tend to affect the basic properties in
their own ways, such as becoming noncommutative in matrices and some forms of vector
multiplication or changing the sign of complex numbers.
Notation
×⋅
Multiplication signs
Different from
{\displaystyle \times }) between the terms (that is, in infix notation).[3] For example,
2
×
12
30
2
×
32.
To reduce confusion between the multiplication sign × and the common variable x,
multiplication is also denoted by dot signs,[4] usually a middle-position dot (rarely period):
⋅
2
The middle dot notation or dot operator, encoded in Unicode as U+22C5 ⋅ DOT OPERATOR, is
now standard in the United States and other countries . When the dot operator character is not
accessible, the interpunct (·) is used. In other countries that use a comma as a decimal mark,
either the period or a middle dot is used for multiplication.[citation needed]
Historically, in the United Kingdom and Ireland, the middle dot was sometimes used for the
decimal to prevent it from disappearing in the ruled line, and the period/full stop was used for
multiplication. However, since the Ministry of Technology ruled to use the period as the decimal
point in 1968,[5] and the International System of Units (SI) standard has since been widely
adopted, this usage is now found only in the more traditional journals such as The Lancet.[6]
{\displaystyle x} times
{\displaystyle y} or
x
{\displaystyle 5x} for five times
{\displaystyle x}), also called implied multiplication.[7] The notation can also be used for
quantities that are surrounded by parentheses (e.g.,
{\displaystyle 5(2)},
{\displaystyle (5)2} or
{\displaystyle (5)(2)} for five times two). This implicit usage of multiplication can cause
ambiguity when the concatenated variables happen to match the name of another variable,
when a variable name in front of a parenthesis can be confused with a function name, or in the
correct determination of the order of operations.[8][9]
In vector multiplication, there is a distinction between the cross and the dot symbols. The cross
symbol generally denotes the taking a cross product of two vectors, yielding a vector as its
result, while the dot denotes taking the dot product of two vectors, resulting in a scalar.
In computer programming, the asterisk (as in 5*2) is still the most common notation. This is
because most computers historically were limited to small character sets (such as ASCII and
EBCDIC) that lacked a multiplication sign (such as ⋅ or ×), while the asterisk appeared on every
keyboard.[citation needed] This usage originated in the FORTRAN programming language.[10]
The numbers to be multiplied are generally called the "factors" (as in factorization). The number
to be multiplied is the "multiplicand", and the number by which it is multiplied is the "multiplier".
Usually, the multiplier is placed first, and the multiplicand is placed second;[11][12] however,
sometimes the first factor is considered the multiplicand and the second the multiplier. Also, as
the result of multiplication does not depend on the order of the factors, the distinction between
"multiplicand" and "multiplier" is useful only at a very elementary level and in some
multiplication algorithms, such as the long multiplication. Therefore, in some sources, the term
"multiplicand" is regarded as a synonym for "factor".[13] In algebra, a number that is the
multiplier of a variable or expression (e.g., the 3 in
The result of a multiplication is called a product. When one factor is an integer, the product is a
multiple of the other or of the product of the others. Thus,
{\displaystyle \pi }, as is
5133
486
{\displaystyle 5133\times 486\times \pi }. A product of integers is a multiple of each factor; for
example, 15 is the product of 3 and 5 and is both a multiple of 3 and a multiple of 5.
Definitions
This section needs attention from an expert in mathematics. The specific problem is: defining
multiplication is not straightforward and different proposals have been made over the centuries,
with competing ideas (e.g. recursive vs. non-recursive definitions). See the talk page for details.
WikiProject Mathematics may be able to help recruit an expert. (September 2023)
The product of two numbers or the multiplication between two numbers can be defined for
common special cases: natural numbers, integers, rational numbers, real numbers, complex
numbers, and quaternions.
3 by 4 is 12.
∈
N
⋅
s
⋯
+
r
⏟
s
times
⋯
+
⏟
r
times
An integer can be either zero, a nonzero natural number, or minus a nonzero natural number.
The product of zero and another integer is always zero. The product of two nonzero integers is
determined by the product of their positive amounts, combined with the sign derived from the
following rule:
×
In words:
⋅
z
⋅
z
⋅
n
There are several equivalent ways to define formally the real numbers; see Construction of the
real numbers. The definition of multiplication is a part of all these definitions.
A fundamental aspect of these definitions is that every real number can be approximated to any
accuracy by rational numbers. A standard way for expressing this is that every real number is the
least upper bound of a set of rational numbers. In particular, every positive real number is the
least upper bound of the truncations of its infinite decimal representation; for example,
3.1
3.14
,
3.141
A fundamental property of real numbers is that rational approximations are compatible with
arithmetic operations, and, in particular, with multiplication. This means that, if a and b are
positive real numbers such that
sup
∈
A
sup
∈
B
⋅
b
=
sup
∈
A
∈
B
⋅
y
{\displaystyle a\cdot b=\sup _{x\in A,y\in B}x\cdot y.} In particular, the product of two positive
real numbers is the least upper bound of the term-by-term products of the sequences of their
decimal representations.
As changing the signs transforms least upper bounds into greatest lower bounds, the simplest
way to deal with a multiplication involving one or two negative numbers, is to use the rule of
signs described above in § Product of two integers. The construction of the real numbers
through Cauchy sequences is often preferred in order to avoid consideration of the four possible
sign configurations.
Two complex numbers can be multiplied by the distributive law and the fact that
a
+
⋅
(
⋅
c
⋅
d
⋅
c
⋅
d
⋅
i
2
⋅
c
⋅
d
⋅
d
⋅
c
b
i
⋅
(
cos
(
sin
(
⋅
e
Furthermore,
i
=
⋅
(
cos
(
sin
(
⋅
e
⋅
c
−
⋅
d
⋅
d
⋅
c
⋅
s
⋅
e
{\displaystyle (a\cdot c-b\cdot d)+(a\cdot d+b\cdot c)i=r\cdot s\cdot e^{i(\varphi +\psi )}.}
The geometric meaning is that the magnitudes are multiplied and the arguments are added.
Product of two quaternions
The product of two quaternions can be found in the article on quaternions. Note, in this case,
that
⋅
b
⋅
a
Computation
The Educated Monkey—a tin toy dated 1918, used as a multiplication "calculator". For example:
set the monkey's feet to 4 and 9, and get the product—36—in its hands.
Many common methods for multiplying numbers using pencil and paper require a multiplication
table of memorized or consulted products of small numbers (typically any two numbers from 0
to 9). However, one method, the peasant multiplication algorithm, does not. The example below
illustrates "long multiplication" (the "standard algorithm", "grade-school multiplication"):
23958233
× 5830
———————————————
00000000 ( = 23,958,233 × 0)
———————————————
139676498390 ( = 139,676,498,390 )
In some countries such as Germany, the multiplication above is depicted similarly but with the
original problem written on a single line and computation starting with the first digit of the
multiplier:[14]
23958233 · 5830
———————————————
119791165
191665864
71874699
00000000
———————————————
139676498390
Multiplying numbers to more than a couple of decimal places by hand is tedious and error-
prone. Common logarithms were invented to simplify such calculations, since adding
logarithms is equivalent to multiplying. The slide rule allowed numbers to be quickly multiplied
to about three places of accuracy. Beginning in the early 20th century, mechanical calculators,
such as the Marchant, automated multiplication of up to 10-digit numbers. Modern electronic
computers and calculators have greatly reduced the need for multiplication by hand.
Historical algorithms
The Ishango bone, dated to about 18,000 to 20,000 BC, may hint at a knowledge of
multiplication in the Upper Paleolithic era in Central Africa, but this is
speculative.[15][verification needed]
Egyptians
The Egyptian method of multiplication of integers and fractions, which is documented in the
Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, was by successive additions and doubling. For instance, to find
the product of 13 and 21 one had to double 21 three times, obtaining 2 × 21 = 42, 4 × 21 = 2 × 42
= 84, 8 × 21 = 2 × 84 = 168. The full product could then be found by adding the appropriate terms
found in the doubling sequence:[16]
The Babylonians used a sexagesimal positional number system, analogous to the modern-day
decimal system. Thus, Babylonian multiplication was very similar to modern decimal
multiplication. Because of the relative difficulty of remembering 60 × 60 different products,
Babylonian mathematicians employed multiplication tables. These tables consisted of a list of
the first twenty multiples of a certain principal number n: n, 2n, ..., 20n; followed by the
multiples of 10n: 30n 40n, and 50n. Then to compute any sexagesimal product, say 53n, one
only needed to add 50n and 3n computed from the table.[citation needed]
Chinese
38 × 76 = 2888
In the mathematical text Zhoubi Suanjing, dated prior to 300 BC, and the Nine Chapters on the
Mathematical Art, multiplication calculations were written out in words, although the early
Chinese mathematicians employed Rod calculus involving place value addition, subtraction,
multiplication, and division. The Chinese were already using a decimal multiplication table by
the end of the Warring States period.[17]
Modern methods
Product of 45 and 256. Note the order of the numerals in 45 is reversed down the left column.
The carry step of the multiplication can be performed at the final stage of the calculation (in
bold), returning the final product of 45 × 256 = 11520. This is a variant of Lattice multiplication.
The modern method of multiplication based on the Hindu–Arabic numeral system was first
described by Brahmagupta. Brahmagupta gave rules for addition, subtraction, multiplication,
and division. Henry Burchard Fine, then a professor of mathematics at Princeton University,
wrote the following:
The Indians are the inventors not only of the positional decimal system itself, but of most of the
processes involved in elementary reckoning with the system. Addition and subtraction they
performed quite as they are performed nowadays; multiplication they effected in many ways,
ours among them, but division they did cumbrously.[18]
These place value decimal arithmetic algorithms were introduced to Arab countries by Al
Khwarizmi in the early 9th century and popularized in the Western world by Fibonacci in the
13th century.[19]
Grid method
Grid method multiplication, or the box method, is used in primary schools in England and Wales
and in some areas[which?] of the United States to help teach an understanding of how multiple
digit multiplication works. An example of multiplying 34 by 13 would be to lay the numbers out
in a grid as follows:
× 30 4
10 300 40
3 90 12
Computer algorithms
Main article: Multiplication algorithm § Fast multiplication algorithms for large inputs
The classical method of multiplying two n-digit numbers requires n2 digit multiplications.
Multiplication algorithms have been designed that reduce the computation time considerably
when multiplying large numbers. Methods based on the discrete Fourier transform reduce the
computational complexity to O(n log n log log n). In 2016, the factor log log n was replaced by a
function that increases much slower, though still not constant.[20] In March 2019, David Harvey
and Joris van der Hoeven submitted a paper presenting an integer multiplication algorithm with
a complexity of
log
n
{\displaystyle O(n\log n).}[21] The algorithm, also based on the fast Fourier transform, is
conjectured to be asymptotically optimal.[22] The algorithm is not practically useful, as it only
becomes faster for multiplying extremely large numbers (having more than 2172912 bits).[23]
Products of measurements
One can only meaningfully add or subtract quantities of the same type, but quantities of
different types can be multiplied or divided without problems. For example, four bags with three
marbles each can be thought of as:[1]
[4 bags] × [3 marbles per bag] = 12 marbles.
When two measurements are multiplied together, the product is of a type depending on the
types of measurements. The general theory is given by dimensional analysis. This analysis is
routinely applied in physics, but it also has applications in finance and other applied fields.
A common example in physics is the fact that multiplying speed by time gives distance. For
example:
In this case, the hour units cancel out, leaving the product with only kilometer units.
Product of a sequence
Capital pi notation
The product of a sequence of factors can be written with the product symbol
{\displaystyle \textstyle \prod }, which derives from the capital letter Π (pi) in the Greek alphabet
(much like the same way the summation symbol
{\displaystyle \textstyle \sum } is derived from the Greek letter Σ (sigma)).[24][25] The meaning
of this notation is given by
4
(
which results in
∏
i
120.
In such a notation, the variable i represents a varying integer, called the multiplication index,
that runs from the lower value 1 indicated in the subscript to the upper value 4 given by the
superscript. The product is obtained by multiplying together all factors obtained by substituting
the multiplication index for an integer between the lower and the upper values (the bounds
included) in the expression that follows the product operator.
⋅
x
m
⋅
x
⋅
⋯
⋅
x
⋅
x
where m and n are integers or expressions that evaluate to integers. In the case where m = n, the
value of the product is the same as that of the single factor xm; if m > n, the product is an empty
product whose value is 1—regardless of the expression for the factors.
By definition,
1
n
⋅
x
⋅
…
⋅
x
⋅
x
⋅
…
⋅
x
=
1
if all
Infinite products
One may also consider products of infinitely many terms; these are called infinite products.
Notationally, this consists in replacing n above by the infinity symbol ∞. The product of such an
infinite sequence is defined as the limit of the product of the first n terms, as n grows without
bound. That is,
∏
i
lim
=
(
lim
⋅
(
lim
Exponentiation
⋯
×
⏟
n
indicates that n copies of the base a are to be multiplied together. This notation can be used
whenever multiplication is known to be power associative.
Properties
Multiplication of numbers 0–10. Line labels = multiplicand. X axis = multiplier. Y axis = product.
Extension of this pattern into other quadrants gives the reason why a negative number times a
negative number yields a positive number.
For real and complex numbers, which includes, for example, natural numbers, integers, and
fractions, multiplication has certain properties:
Commutative property
The order in which two numbers are multiplied does not matter:[27][28]
⋅
y
⋅
x
Associative property
Expressions solely involving multiplication or addition are invariant with respect to the order of
operations:[27][28]
⋅
y
⋅
z
=
x
⋅
(
⋅
z
Distributive property
Holds with respect to multiplication over addition. This identity is of prime importance in
simplifying algebraic expressions:[27][28]
⋅
(
⋅
y
⋅
z
Identity element
The multiplicative identity is 1; anything multiplied by 1 is itself. This feature of 1 is known as the
identity property:[27][28]
x
⋅
1
Property of 0
⋅
0
0.
Negation
⋅
x
−
x
0.
{\displaystyle (-x)+x=0.}
−1 times −1 is 1:
⋅
(
1.
Inverse element
⋅
(
)
=
Order preservation
The complex numbers do not have an ordering that is compatible with both addition and
multiplication.[30]
Other mathematical systems that include a multiplication operation may not have all these
properties. For example, multiplication is not, in general, commutative for matrices and
quaternions.[27] Hurwitz's theorem shows that for the hypercomplex numbers of dimension 8
or greater, including the octonions, sedenions, and trigintaduonions, multiplication is generally
not associative.[31]
Axioms
In the book Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita, Giuseppe Peano proposed axioms
for arithmetic based on his axioms for natural numbers. Peano arithmetic has two axioms for
multiplication:
y
)
Here S(y) represents the successor of y; i.e., the natural number that follows y. The various
properties like associativity can be proved from these and the other axioms of Peano arithmetic,
including induction. For instance, S(0), denoted by 1, is a multiplicative identity because
x
=
The axioms for integers typically define them as equivalence classes of ordered pairs of natural
numbers. The model is based on treating (x,y) as equivalent to x − y when x and y are treated as
integers. Thus both (0,1) and (1,2) are equivalent to −1. The multiplication axiom for integers
defined this way is
p
×
1
)
)
.
The product of non-negative integers can be defined with set theory using cardinal numbers or
the Peano axioms. See below how to extend this to multiplying arbitrary integers, and then
arbitrary rational numbers. The product of real numbers is defined in terms of products of
rational numbers; see construction of the real numbers.[32]
There are many sets that, under the operation of multiplication, satisfy the axioms that define
group structure. These axioms are closure, associativity, and the inclusion of an identity
element and inverses.
A simple example is the set of non-zero rational numbers. Here identity 1 is had, as opposed to
groups under addition where the identity is typically 0. Note that with the rationals, zero must be
excluded because, under multiplication, it does not have an inverse: there is no rational number
that can be multiplied by zero to result in 1. In this example, an abelian group is had, but that is
not always the case.
To see this, consider the set of invertible square matrices of a given dimension over a given field.
Here, it is straightforward to verify closure, associativity, and inclusion of identity (the identity
matrix) and inverses. However, matrix multiplication is not commutative, which shows that this
group is non-abelian.
Another fact worth noticing is that the integers under multiplication do not form a group—even if
zero is excluded. This is easily seen by the nonexistence of an inverse for all elements other than
1 and −1.
⋅
{\displaystyle \cdot } b or ab. When referring to a group via the indication of the set and
operation, the dot is used. For example, our first example could be indicated by
(
⋅
)
Numbers can count (3 apples), order (the 3rd apple), or measure (3.5 feet high); as the history of
mathematics has progressed from counting on our fingers to modelling quantum mechanics,
multiplication has been generalized to more complicated and abstract types of numbers, and to
things that are not numbers (such as matrices) or do not look much like numbers (such as
quaternions).
Integers
{\displaystyle N\times M} is the sum of N copies of M when N and M are positive whole
numbers. This gives the number of things in an array N wide and M high. Generalization to
negative numbers can be done by
(
−
Rational numbers
Generalization to fractions
A
B
{\displaystyle {\frac {A}{B}}\times {\frac {C}{D}}={\frac {(A\times C)}{(B\times D)}}}. This gives the
area of a rectangle
{\displaystyle {\frac {C}{D}}} wide, and is the same as the number of things in an array when the
rational numbers happen to be whole numbers.[27]
Real numbers
Real numbers and their products can be defined in terms of sequences of rational numbers.
Complex numbers
a
2
Equivalently, denoting
{\displaystyle i},
2
+
)
+
1
a
cos
ϕ
sin
ϕ
2
(
cos
ϕ
sin
ϕ
{\displaystyle z_{1}=r_{1}(\cos \phi _{1}+i\sin \phi _{1}),z_{2}=r_{2}(\cos \phi _{2}+i\sin \phi _{2})},
then
cos
(
ϕ
2
sin
(
Further generalizations
See Multiplication in group theory, above, and multiplicative group, which for example includes
matrix multiplication. A very general, and abstract, concept of multiplication is as the
"multiplicatively denoted" (second) binary operation in a ring. An example of a ring that is not
any of the number systems above is a polynomial ring (polynomials can be added and
multiplied, but polynomials are not numbers in any usual sense).
Division
Often division,
)
{\displaystyle x\left({\frac {1}{y}}\right)}. Multiplication for some types of "numbers" may have
corresponding division, without inverses; in an integral domain x may have no inverse "
{\displaystyle {\frac {x}{y}}} may be defined. In a division ring there are inverses, but
Calculator
=4
See also
Dimensional analysis
Multiplication algorithm
Multiplication table
Floating-point arithmetic
Multiply–accumulate operation
Fused multiply–add
Wallace tree
Factorial
Genaille–Lucas rulers
Lunar arithmetic
Napier's bones
Peasant multiplication
Slide rule
References
Khan Academy (2012-09-06), Why aren't we using the multiplication sign? | Introduction to
algebra | Algebra I | Khan Academy, archived from the original on 2017-03-27, retrieved 2017-03-
07
"Victory on Points". Nature. 218 (5137): 111. 1968. Bibcode:1968Natur.218S.111..
doi:10.1038/218111c0.
"The Lancet – Formatting guidelines for electronic submission of manuscripts" (PDF). Retrieved
2017-04-25.
Announcing the TI Programmable 88! (PDF). Texas Instruments. 1982. Archived (PDF) from the
original on 2017-08-03. Retrieved 2017-08-03. Now, implied multiplication is recognized by the
AOS and the square root, logarithmic, and trigonometric functions can be followed by their
arguments as when working with pencil and paper. (NB. The TI-88 only existed as a prototype
and was never released to the public.)
Peterson, Dave (2023-08-18). "Implied Multiplication 1: Not as Bad as You Think". Algebra /
Ambiguity, PEMDAS. The Math Doctors. Archived from the original on 2023-09-24. Retrieved
2023-09-25; Peterson, Dave (2023-08-25). "Implied Multiplication 2: Is There a Standard?".
Algebra, Arithmetic / Ambiguity, PEMDAS. The Math Doctors. Archived from the original on 2023-
09-24. Retrieved 2023-09-25; Peterson, Dave (2023-09-01). "Implied Multiplication 3: You Can't
Prove It". Algebra / PEMDAS. The Math Doctors. Archived from the original on 2023-09-24.
Retrieved 2023-09-25.
Litvin, Chester (2012). Advance Brain Stimulation by Psychoconduction. Trafford. pp. 2–3, 5–6.
ISBN 978-1-4669-0152-0 – via Google Book Search.
Pletser, Vladimir (2012-04-04). "Does the Ishango Bone Indicate Knowledge of the Base 12? An
Interpretation of a Prehistoric Discovery, the First Mathematical Tool of Humankind".
arXiv:1204.1019 [math.HO].
Qiu, Jane (2014-01-07). "Ancient times table hidden in Chinese bamboo strips". Nature.
doi:10.1038/nature.2014.14482. S2CID 130132289. Archived from the original on 2014-01-22.
Retrieved 2014-01-22.
Fine, Henry B. (1907). The Number System of Algebra – Treated Theoretically and Historically
(PDF) (2nd ed.). p. 90.
Bernhard, Adrienne. "How modern mathematics emerged from a lost Islamic library". bbc.com.
Retrieved 2022-04-22.
Harvey, David; van der Hoeven, Joris; Lecerf, Grégoire (2016). "Even faster integer
multiplication". Journal of Complexity. 36: 1–30. arXiv:1407.3360.
doi:10.1016/j.jco.2016.03.001. ISSN 0885-064X. S2CID 205861906.
David Harvey, Joris Van Der Hoeven (2019). Integer multiplication in time O(n log n) Archived
2019-04-08 at the Wayback Machine
Hartnett, Kevin (2019-04-11). "Mathematicians Discover the Perfect Way to Multiply". Quanta
Magazine. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
Klarreich, Erica (January 2020). "Multiplication Hits the Speed Limit". cacm.acm.org. Archived
from the original on 2020-10-31. Retrieved 2020-01-25.
Biggs, Norman L. (2002). Discrete Mathematics. Oxford University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-19-
871369-2.
Angell, David. "ORDERING COMPLEX NUMBERS... NOT*" (PDF). UNSW Sydney, School of
Mathematics and Statistics. Retrieved 2021-12-29.
Cawagas, Raoul E.; Carrascal, Alexander S.; Bautista, Lincoln A.; Maria, John P. Sta.; Urrutia,
Jackie D.; Nobles, Bernadeth (2009). "The Subalgebra Structure of the Cayley-Dickson Algebra
of Dimension 32 (trigintaduonion)". arXiv:0907.2047v3 [math.RA].
"10.2: Building the Real Numbers". Mathematics LibreTexts. 2018-04-11. Retrieved 2023-06-23.
Burns, Gerald (1977). Introduction to group theory with applications. New York: Academic
Press. ISBN 9780121457501.
Further reading
Boyer, Carl B. (revised by Merzbach, Uta C.) (1991). History of Mathematics. John Wiley and
Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-471-54397-8.
External links
vte
Elementary arithmetic
vte
Hyperoperations
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional
terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia®
is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Multiplication
123 languages
Add topic