Genetic algorithm Global maximum power point tracking Partial shading Solar PV systems
Genetic algorithm Global maximum power point tracking Partial shading Solar PV systems
Corresponding Author:
Janardhan Gurram
Departement of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, CVR College of Engineering
Vastunagar, Mangalpalli, Ibrahimpatnam, Telangana, India
Email: janumtech009@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION
The solar photo voltaic PV system is one of the finest renewable energy resources among the family
of renewables like wind, and bigas, due to its less maintenance, short time of its payback period. India is to
reach 175GW renewable energy capacity by 2022 out of which it is 100 GW of solar PV is expected. It is
forecasted that the solar PV capacity is raising at a rate of 16% between 2018 to 2026 [1]. The global solar
market recording new trends in its installation due to the availability of advanced power conversion
technologies in industry and sophisticated research. The grid connected to solar PV systems are popular, as
they adopt the maximum power point tracking techniques at module level, string level or even at central
level, i.e for entire PV system resulting highly efficient [2].
The transformerless grid connected PV system involves a PV array, DC-DC converter, inverter, and
grid as shown in Figure 1. A general grid connected PV system include either a high frequency transformer
on PV side or a power frequency transformer on grid side that provides galvanic disconnection between PV
and grid, resulting in the reduction of variation in common mode voltages, that are caused by virtual
capacitances between PV and ground. The variation in common mode voltage causes leakage currents which
can be reduced by incorporating extra switches on AC side or DC side [3]. By eliminating the transformer in
the system, the efficiency can be boosted by 1-2%. There is a considerable reduction in space and cost which
made the leading manufacturers of PV systems to offer at competitive prices. However, grid connected PV
systems should adhere to grid standards and protection of the system to meet safety of the system and
operating personnel [4].
DC-DC
Filter
PV Converter Inverter
Grid,V,f
ARRAY
Parasitic/Stray Vg
P&O MPPT Control Ig
Capacitances
G(Irradiation)
T(Temperature) ANN
The grid connected transformerless inverter PV system has an effect of stray or parasitic
capacitances formed between PV panel’s aluminum beading and ground which could cause variation in
common mode voltage, in turn results huge leakage currents. The Figure 1 indicates PV array connected to a
DC-DC (boost) converter and the pulses to the converter is governed by Perturb and observe maximum
power point tracking algorithm [5]-[7]. The input to maximum power point tracking MPPT is PV voltage and
current which are inherited from the artificial neural network that is controlled by irradiance and temperature
inputs. Though, there are multiple hybrid control networks to track maximum power from are in literature,
this ANN based DC-DC maximum power tracking converter is having an advantage of simplified
implementation [8]. An H bridge inverter with bipolar pulse width modulation is used to convert dc power
into ac and subsequently feed into the grid. The control pulses to the inverter are fed from the control block,
which is controlled by grid voltage, grid current. Boost converter used for raising the voltage that is required
to with in the prescribed limits to avoid any tripping of the inverter [9]. This paper presents an ANN based
DC-DC converter using perturb and observe technique to track maximum power from PV to grid [10].
3. PV MODULE CHARACTERISTICS
Solar irradiation is not constant over the day and varies from season to season. The voltage, power
also depends on the temperature of the module. Solar I-V, P-V characteristics shown in Figure 3, on x axis
PV voltage is indicated, on y axis PV current and power are as shown. Isc represents short circuit current, voc
is open circuit voltage of PV cell and MPP is maximum power point [16]. It is the point where the maximum
voltage and maximum current of PV will occur. It is required to operate the solar PV at MPP point to get the
maximum power from it. In spite of variation in solar irradiation and temperature, PV will not deliver
maximum power to the load. In order to counter this various MPPT techniques are found in literature [17].
Standard test conditions are of irradiation level 1000W/m2, temperature 250C is used to test the solar PV so
that the maximum power can be received [7].
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2022: 1246-1254
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst ISSN: 2088-8694 1249
𝑑𝑝
> 0 left side of Maximum power point (2)
𝑑𝑣
𝑑𝑝
< 0 right side of Maximum power point (3)
𝑑𝑣
Start
P=P(n)-P(n-1)
V=V(n)-V(n-1)
Yes
Is P=0
NO
Is P>0
Yes NO
Is V>0 Is V<0
Yes NO NO Yes
Vref=Vref+ V Vref=Vref- V Vref=Vref- V Vref=Vref+ V
Return
Tuning the duty cycle is done to match the impedance of load and PV. The value of duty ratio is in
between 0 and 1 making the output voltage if most converter is greater than input voltage. The parameters of
boost converter are the value of inductance and capacitance mentioned in Figure 5. are determined by the
amount of ripple allowed as mentioned in (5) and (6).
𝑉𝑖𝑛 (𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 −𝑉𝑖𝑛 )
𝐿= (5)
𝑓𝑠𝑤 ×∆𝐼∗𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡
Where 𝑓𝑠𝑤 represents switching frequency, ∆I is the ripple current in the output.
𝐼𝑜𝑢𝑡 (𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡 −𝑉𝑖𝑛 )
𝐶= (6)
𝑓𝑠𝑤 ×∆𝑉∗𝑉𝑜𝑢𝑡
L1 D1
Grid
PV connected
Array C
Inverter
4. TRANSFORMERLESS INVERTERS
With the increased research on grid connected converter systems, grid connected inverters using
with transformers are replaced by transformerless inverters, as it takes less space, and the efficiency can be
increased. There are various inverter topologies that are published in the literature that describes reduction of
leakage currents are basic H bridge inverter using bipolar pulse width modulation [23]. Transformerless
inverters are broadly categorized as the following: Providing isolation either on DC side or grid side. H5
inverter topology i.e full bridge inverter with added switch provides dc side disconnection to avoid leakage
currents. Inverter is highly efficient reliable concept HERIC, inverter that uses two extra switches on ac or
grid side switches will be incorporated either dc side or ac side to isolate PV from grid [24] as shown in
Figure 6.
L D1
C1
S1 S3
G
L1 R
PV c c I
PANEL
D
Duty L2
S2
cycle S4
C2
I PV
V PV ANN-
MPPT
5. CONTROL TECHNIQUE
The pulse width modulated output from MPPT controller will manipulate the resistance at the input
terminals of boost converter to match with the resistance at the output terminals of PV. In addition to the
perturb and observe technique driven by Vpv, Ipv used in MPPT controller, artificial neural network
generates a pulse-width modulation PWM reference to boost converter using PV voltage and current. The
maximum power point for a particular PV curve is calculated by ANN and a reference voltage signal is
generated and fed to classic perturb and observe technique [25].
The conventional maximum power track technique is replaced by an artificial neural network whose
input are controlled by PV current and voltage. The an algorithm is trained for various parameters like as
number of nodes, number of layers. Regression plots are compared with these variations to achieve best
tuned model. The model developed and used for the purpose is using three (3) layers, each of 25 nodes is
used for the best performance as shown in the Figure 7. Levenberg-Marquardt [7] function is used to train the
model. The model with Levenberg-Marquardt implementation is compared with gradient descent with
momentum & adaptive LR indicating that the mean square error is observed to be minimum using
Levenberg-Marquardt training function. MATLAB Simulink windows for various parameters can be
observed in Figure 7. Regression plots for models tuned can indicate that the model with three layers and 25
nodes with each layer shows good performance of the model during training. Mean square error of 0.212 is
found to be minimum out of all trainings [17]-[20].
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2022: 1246-1254
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst ISSN: 2088-8694 1251
Table 1. Parameters
Parameter Value
Irradiance 750-1000 Watts/m2
Temperature 25-450C
DC link Voltage 450 volts
Grid voltage; Frequency 230V;50Hz
Switching Frequency 3780Hz
Power rating of PV array 3500W
Filter inductance 2.18mH
Filter Capacitor 330ưF
Parasitic Capacitance 100 ưF
(a) (b)
Figure 7. ANN training performance (a) regression plot and (b) Performance of the ANN training
Power at the DC side is shown in Figure 10 peak power reaches 3500 Watts. Direct axis current i.e
only active component of current as shown in Figure 11 is injected into grid by making q axis component
zero. Figure 12 indicates grid voltage and the grid current indicated by Figure 13. The grid current is varying
with respect to the irradiance level. Figure 14 shows inverter current and is injected to grid as per the
requirement. It depends on voltage value and phase angle. Inverter supplying the required current governed
by the reference current. Figure 15 indicating the leakage current is found to be zero. The trained neural
network model used for the purpose of generating a reference wave for PWM to operate DC-DC converter
Artificial neural network based DC-DC converter for … (Janardhan Gurram)
1252 ISSN: 2088-8694
and the common mode leakage current is zero. Figure 16 represents the solar irradiation data obtained for 8
weeks. The duty cycle value is being achieved with respect to the trained model and the best duty cycle value
is achieved and it is shown in Figure 17. Leakage current is found to be zero and for the Irradiation variation
shown in the Figure 18. The value of the leakage current in the figure is zoomed in the range of power of
10-7 to show that the current is found to be zero.
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2022: 1246-1254
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst ISSN: 2088-8694 1253
7. CONCLUSION
Grid connected transformerless inverters are more into practice due to their high efficiency, less
space requirement. Due to absence of galvanic isolation the transforemerless inverters suffers leakage
currents which can be avoided by different inverter topologies and pulse width modulation techniques.
Artificial neural network with three layers and 25 nodes each is developed and trained to operate DC-DC
converter for grid connected PV system, and the common mode leakage current using bipolar pulse width
modulation technique fed to H bridge inverter. Best performance is achieved at epoch 33. The inputs artificial
neural network derived from PV voltage, current. Maximum power is tracked based on switching dc
converter with respect to the inputs.
REFERENCES
[1] G. Jayaraju and G. S. Rao, “A new optimized ANN algorithm based single phase grid connected PV-wind system using single
switch high gain DC-DC converter,” European Journal of Electrical Engineering., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 373-381, 2019, doi:
10.18280/ejee.210405.
[2] K. Ravikiran and K. S. Srikant, “Reactive Power Control for Grid Tied PVG System with ANN Based Transformerless Inverter,”
International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 536-542, 2019, doi:
10.35940/ijitee.b1127.1292s319.
[3] E. Akpınar, A. Balıkcı, E. Durbaba and B. T. Azizoğlu, “Single-Phase Transformerless Photovoltaic Inverter With Suppressing
Resonance in Improved H6,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 8304-8316, 2019, doi:
10.1109/TPEL.2018.2886054.
[4] W. I. Hameed, B. A. Sawadi, and A. Muayed, “Voltage Tracking Control of DC- DC Boost Converter Using Fuzzy Neural
Network,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1657-1665, 2018, doi:
10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i4.pp1657-1665.
[5] L. Zhang, X. Ruan and X. Ren, “Second-Harmonic Current Reduction for Two-Stage Inverter With Boost-Derived Front-End
Converter: Control Schemes and Design Considerations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 6361-6378,
2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2746878.
[6] A. Anurag, N. Deshmukh, A. Maguluri and S. Anand, “Integrated DC–DC Converter Based Grid-Connected Transformerless
Photovoltaic Inverter With Extended Input Voltage Range,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 8322-
8330, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2779144.
[7] F. Berrezzek, K. Khelil and T. Bouadjila, “Efficient MPPT scheme for a photovoltaic generator using neural network,” 1st
International Conference on Communications, Control Systems and Signal Processing (CCSSP), 2020, pp. 503-507, doi:
10.1109/CCSSP49278.2020.9151551.
[8] N. S. Jayalakshmi, A. Kumar and A. Kumar, “Analysis and Design of Single Phase High Efficiency Transformer less PV Inverter
Topology,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 730-737, 2018, doi:
10.11591/ijpeds.v9.i2.pp730-737.
[9] G. Janardhan, G. N. Srinivas and N. N. V. S. Babu, “Realization of Constant Common Mode Voltage in Transformerless Photo
Voltaic Inverter Topologies,” International Conference on Circuits and Systems in Digital Enterprise Technology (ICCSDET),
2018, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICCSDET.2018.8821224.
[10] S. Anand, S. K. Gundlapalli and B. G. Fernandes, “Transformer-Less Grid Feeding Current Source Inverter for Solar Photovoltaic
System,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 5334-5344, 2014, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2014.2300038.
[11] P. Q. Dzung, L. D. Khoa, H. H. Lee, L. M. Phuong and N. T. Dan Vu, “The new MPPT algorithm using ANN-based PV,”
International Forum on Strategic Technology, 2010, pp. 402-407, doi: 10.1109/IFOST.2010.5668004.
[12] N. Kalaiarasi, E. Nagalakshmaiah, S. S. Dash, and S. Paramasivam, “Development and analysis of ANN based MPPT and SL Z-
source inverter for photovoltaic systems,” International Journal Control Theory Application, vol. 9, no. 39, pp. 313-323, 2016.
[13] L. Jiang and D. L. Maskell, “A simple hybrid MPPT technique for photovoltaic systems under rapidly changing partial shading
conditions,” IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2014, pp. 0782-0787, doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925034.
[14] H. Diab, H. El-Helw and H. Talaat, “Intelligent maximum power tracking and inverter hysteresis current control of grid-connected
PV systems,” International Conference on Advances in Power Conversion and Energy Technologies (APCET), 2012, pp. 1-5, doi:
10.1109/APCET.2012.6302065.
[15] F. Sedaghati, A. Nahavandi, M. A. Badamchizadeh, S. Ghaemi, and M. Abedinpour Fallah, “PV maximum power-point tracking
by using artificial neural network,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, no. 506709, 2012, doi:
10.1155/2012/506709.
[16] I. Chtouki, P. Wira and M. Zazi, “Comparison of several neural network perturb and observe MPPT methods for photovoltaic
applications,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), 2018, pp. 909-914, doi:
10.1109/ICIT.2018.8352299.
[17] A. Syed and S. T. Kalyani, “Evaluation of single phase transformerless photovoltaic inverters,” International Journal Electrical
Electronics Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 25-39, 2015.
[18] V.G. Gerardo, M. R. P. Raymundo, and S.Z. J. Miguel, “High Efficiency Single-Phase Transformer-less Inverter for Photovoltaic
ApplicationsInversor monofásico de alta eficiencia sin transformador para aplicaciones fotovoltaicas,” Ingeniería, Investigación y
Tecnología, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173-184, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.riit.2015.03.002.
[19] Y. H. Liu, C. L. Liu, J. W. Huang, and J. H. Chen, “Neural-network-based maximum power point tracking methods for
photovoltaic systems operating under fast changing environments,” Solar Energy, vol. 89, pp. 42-53, 2013, doi:
10.1016/j.solener.2012.11.017.
[20] O. Veligorskyi, R. Chakirov and Y. Vagapov, “Artificial neural network-based maximum power point tracker for the photovoltaic
application,” 1st International Conference on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems (INISCom), 2015, pp. 133-138, doi:
10.4108/icst.iniscom.2015.258313.
[21] Y. Zhang, S. Wang, H. Xia and J. Ge, “A Novel SVPWM Modulation Scheme,” Twenty-Fourth Annual IEEE Applied Power
Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2009, pp. 128-131, doi: 10.1109/APEC.2009.4802644.
[22] C. L. Reddy, P. S. Kumar, and M. Sushama, “Performance Comparison of Star Connected Cascaded STATCOM Using Different
PWM Techniques,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1303-1319, 2017, doi:
10.11591/ijpeds.v8i3.pp1303-1319.
[23] C. L. Reddy, P. S. Kumar, and M. Sushama, “Modified Modulation Techniques for Cascaded Multilevel Inverter Fed Induction
Motor Drive,” Global Journal of Research In Engineering, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1-9, 2015.
[24] L. Zhang and X. Ruan, “Control Schemes for Reducing Second Harmonic Current in Two-Stage Single-Phase Converter: An
Overview From DC-Bus Port-Impedance Characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 10341-
10358, 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2894647.
[25] L. Zhang et al., “Design Considerations for High-Voltage Insulated Gate Drive Power Supply for 10-kV SiC MOSFET Applied in
Medium-Voltage Converter,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 5712-5724, July 2021, doi:
10.1109/TIE.2020.3000131.
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS
Int J Pow Elec & Dri Syst, Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2022: 1246-1254