Sampling-RDL-1
Sampling-RDL-1
To draw valid conclusions from your results, you must carefully decide how you
will select a sample that is representative of the group as a whole. This is called a
sampling method. There are two primary types of sampling methods that you can
use in your research:
You should clearly explain how you selected your sample in the methodology
section of your paper or thesis, as well as how you approached minimizing
research bias in your work.
Selecting the right sample is crucial for obtaining accurate and reliable results.
One of the most popular and effective methods for selecting a sample is
probability sampling. Let’s explore the different types of probability sampling.
From simple random sampling to stratified random sampling, we’ll break down
each method to help you determine which one is best for your research project.
2. Stratified random Sampling: This method involves dividing the population into
subgroups or strata and selecting a random sample from each stratum. This
technique is useful when the population is heterogeneous, and you want to
ensure that the sample is representative of different subgroups
3. Cluster Sampling: This method involves dividing the population into groups or
clusters and then randomly selecting some of those clusters. This technique is
useful when the population is spread out over a large geographical area. But It is
not possible or practical to survey everyone.
4. Systematic Sampling: This method involves selecting every nth member of the
population after a random starting point is chosen.
There are two ways in which researchers choose the samples in this method of
sampling: The lottery system and using number-generating software/ random
number table. This sampling technique usually works around a large population
and has its fair share of advantages and disadvantages.
Members of these groups should be distinct so that every member of all groups
get equal opportunity to be selected using simple probability. This sampling
method is also called “random quota sampling.”
Cluster sampling is a way to select participants randomly that are spread out
geographically. For example, if you wanted to choose 100 participants from the
entire population of the U.S., it is likely impossible to get a complete list of
everyone. Instead, the researcher randomly selects areas (i.e., cities or counties)
and randomly selects from within those boundaries.
Convenience sampling
is a non-probability sampling technique where samples are selected from the population
only because they are conveniently available to the researcher. Researchers choose
these samples just because they are easy to recruit, and the researcher did not
consider selecting a sample that represents the entire population.
Ideally, in research, it is good to test a sample that represents the population. But, in
some research, the population is too large to examine and consider the entire
population. It is one of the reasons why researchers rely on convenience sampling,
which is the most common non-probability sampling method, because of its speed, cost-
effectiveness, and ease of availability of the sample.
Consecutive sampling
Quota sampling
Hypothetically consider, a researcher wants to study the career goals of male and
female employees in an organization. There are 500 employees in the organization,
also known as the population. To understand better about a population, the researcher
will need only a sample, not the entire population. Further, the researcher is interested
in particular strata within the population. Here is where quota sampling helps in dividing
the population into strata or groups.
In the judgmental sampling method, researchers select the samples based purely on
the researcher’s knowledge and credibility. In other words, researchers choose only
those people who they deem fit to participate in the research study. Judgmental or
purposive sampling is not a scientific method of sampling, and the downside to this
sampling technique is that the preconceived notions of a researcher can influence the
results. Thus, this research technique involves a high amount of ambiguity.