Structralism
Structralism
Structralism
Structuralism
(De Saussure, F . / Bloomfield, L. et alii).
Structuralism
European
1920s
North American
1930s 1960s
Linguists tried to reconstruct dead languages on the basis of the similarities that were found to exist between languages thought to be related historically to those dead languages.
In short, during the 19th century scholars in linguistics worked from a historical, diachronic, perspective.
European Structuralism
De Saussure was not satisfied with the historical comparison of language. He stated that such comparison only answered where a language comes from, but not what language is.
Ferdinand de Saussure
1857 - 1913
European Structuralism
Main tenets
European Structuralism
Main tenets
European Structuralism
Main tenets
European Structuralism
Signified Signifier
/ka:r/
Physical dimension of language
Sign
Car
European Structuralism
Main tenets
Langue Parole
Actual speech
They found that there was no methodology for them to follow in order to describe these languages.
Leonard Bloomfield
1887-1949
Reasons:
1) Not every language has a written form. 2) Everybody learns an oral language. 3) The spoken form comes first than the written one.
/l/
[lang-gwI]
Language is a system
Prato?
In this respect, they provide two observable criteria for defying the items of language: Form and Distribution.
REPBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE VENEZUELA UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGGICA EXPERIMENTAL LIBERTADOR INSTITUTO PEDAGGICO CARACAS VICERRECTORADO DE INVESTIGACIN Y POSTGRADO COORDINACIN NACIONAL DE POSTGRADO Maestra en Enseanza del Ingls como Lengua Extranjera
Thanks
References
Aitchison, J. (1978). Linguistics. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B.F. Skinner, Verbal behavior. Language. 35: 26-57. --------------- (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. --------------- (1966-1973) Linguistic theory. In Oller J. and J. Richard (eds.) Focus on the Learner. Rowley, Mass.:Newbury House. Culler, J. (1976). Ferdinand de Saussure. London : Penguin Books. Department of Linguistics. The Ohio State University (1972). Language Files. Reinoldsburg, Ohio: Advocate Publishing Group. Halliday, M.A.K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold. Hymes, D. (1971/1979). On communicative competence. In Brumfit, C. and K. Johnson (eds.) The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mackey, W. (1966/1973). Language didactics and applied linguistics. In J. Oller and J. Richard (eds). Focus on the learner. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. OGrady, W., M. Dobrovolsky and M. Aronoff. (1989). Contemporary linguistics: an introduction. New York: St. Martins Press. De Saussure, F.
Structuralism
Let us discus these questions together:
1) How Structuralism, Functionalism and Generativism have contribute to our present understanding of language? 2) Why havent the questions what is language and how does language work havent been completely answered? 3) In which aspects European and North American Structuralism meet and differ?