Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
136 views35 pages

Desulfurization v1.2 (Final)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 35

Desulfurization of Natural Gas

Rana Muhammad Haris (P. No. 2437)


Composition of Feed Gas
Composition Percentage
H2 1.95
N2 3.18
Ar 0.01
CO2 2.22
CH4 88.17
C2H6 2.74
CnHn+2 1.74
Organic Sulfur 12.4 ppm by weight
H2S 1.8 ppm by weight
Methods to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Methods to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Absorption

Physical Chemical
Absorption Absorption
Methods to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Old Method to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Adsorption

Physical Adsorption
Activated Carbon was This system was used
was considered the
considered the best in all older generation
only way to adhere
adsorbent Plants
sulfur compounds

Granules of Activated
Exothermic Process
Carbon are added
Activated Carbon System
Four Beds of Activated Carbon (Two Smaller and Two Larger)
Set of One Smaller and One Larger kept Online
Other set is kept Regeneration and Standby
All four can be operated in Series
Activated Carbon Beds are specially designed for:
H2S
Carbonyl
Mercaptans
Heavy Hydrocarbons
Periodically Carbon Beds are vented to the atmosphere
Sulfur Contents is Below 1ppm Typically 0.2ppm by Volume
Process Conditions
Design Pressure

C-101A/B = 44 kg/cm2
C-101C/D = 54 kg/cm2

Design Temperature

C-101A/B = 149
C-101C/D = 343

Operating Pressure

C-101A/B/C/D = 41 kg/cm2

Operating Temperature

C-101A/B/C/D = 26
Disadvantages of Carbon Bed System

Just have a continuous operation of 3 5 days

Can lead to catalytic oxidation of VOCs in bed

Higher Sulfur Slippage

Regeneration Required

More Man Power Required

Decreasing life of downstream expensive catalysts

Larger Volume of Bed Required


Regeneration of Carbon Beds

Thermal Regeneration
Blowing Steam at 80 200
Cooling air is then passed
Nitrogen can also be used

Vacuum Regeneration
Prevent contamination of VOC with Steam
Lower the Pressure so the compounds which are more
volatile will boil
Regeneration of Carbon Beds

Thermal Regeneration
Blowing Steam at 80 200
Cooling air is then passed
Nitrogen can also be used

Vacuum Regeneration
Prevent contamination of VOC with Steam
Lower the Pressure so the compounds which are more
volatile will boil
Methods to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Methods to Remove Sulfur

Absorption

Adsorption

Chemisorption
Why Hot ZnO System?

Adhere Sulfur More Firmly

Physical as well as Chemical Process

Very Low Sulfur Slippage

Higher Desorption Energy

Lesser Catalyst is Required due to More Absorption Capacity

Lesser Vessel Volume is Required


Why Hot ZnO System?

Increased Life of Expensive Downstream Catalysts

No Regeneration is Required

Less Man Power is Required

Continuous Operation up to 3 Years

Less Maintenance is Required

Well Proven and Internationally Accepted System


Project Economics
Project Cost (Without Catalyst)
US $ 1.65 Million

Catalyst Cost (Hydrotreater & Desulfurizer)


US $ 0.32 Million

Pay Back Period = 1.48 Years


Operating Conditions

Temperature
380

Pressure
38 kg/cm2

Reaction is Exothermic in Nature


Internal Chemistry of ZnO System
Reactions occurring in Desulfurizer are
ZnO + H2S ZnS + H2O

If COS are present in the feedstock following reaction


will also take place
COS + ZnO CO2 + ZnS

The reaction can also occur on the ambient


conditions
Composition of Co Mo Catalyst

Catalyst Composition by Weight

HTZ 3 (Haldor Topsoe)

ZnO > 99 %
Al2O3 <1%

ZnO Al2O3
Catalyst Physical Properties (ZnO)

Properties Values
Shape Cylindrical Extrudates
Size - Diameter 4 mm
Size - Length 4 8 mm
Pore Volume 0.24 ml/g
Bulk Density 1.35 kg / Liter
Total Volume 2 x 10.5 m3
Max Sulfur Sorption Capacity 39 kg of S / 100 kg Catalyst
Pressure Drop 0.2 kg / cm2
Sulfur at Exit of ZnO 10 20 ppb
Problems in Implementing ZnO System

Appropriate and Efficient Heating System

Organic Sulfur in the Feed Stock


Problems in Implementing ZnO System

Appropriate and Efficient Heating System

Organic Sulfur in the Feed Stock


Appropriate and Efficient Heating System

Two Gas Gas Heat Exchangers (E-1001A/B)


Maximum temperature achieved in Tube Side of E-1001A/B is
330

One Fired Heater (F-1003)


Further heating from 330 to 380 is carried out in a Fired
Heater (F-1003)

System is Designed on Two Percent Heat Loss


Problems in Implementing ZnO System

Appropriate and Efficient Heating System

Organic Sulfur in the Feed Stock


Problems in Implementing ZnO System

Appropriate and Efficient Heating System

Organic Sulfur in the Feed Stock


Organic Sulfur in the Feed Stock

Another Reactor is used at the Upstream of


Desulfurizer which is called Hydrotreater
Hydrotreater is used to convert organic sulfur to
inorganic sulfur

Reaction that occurs in Hydrotreater is as follows


R CH2 SH + H2 R CH3 +H2S
Organic Sulfur at the Downstream is < 10 ppb
Adding Hydrogen as a Reactant

Hydrogen is added from the syngas coming from


second stage of Syngas Compressor (K-306A/B)
It is added at the upstream of the Fired Heater (F-
1003)

Hydrogen in Recycle Stream = 2%


Flow added = 1206 NMc/hr
Catalyst Selection for Hydrotreater

Co Mo (Cobalt Molybdenum)

Olefin < 1 %
CO < 3%
CO2 < 13%

Ni Mo (Nickel Molybdenum)

Olefin > 1 %
CO > 3%
CO2 > 13%
Catalyst Selection for Hydrotreater

Co Mo (Cobalt Molybdenum)

Olefin < 1 %
CO < 3%
CO2 < 13%

Ni Mo (Nickel Molybdenum)

Olefin > 1 %
CO > 3%
CO2 > 13%
Composition of Co Mo Catalyst

Catalyst Composition by Weight

TK 250 (Haldor Topsoe)

CoO = 3.6
MoO3 = 14.3

Al2O3 = 82.1

CoO MoO3 Al2O3


Catalyst Physical Properties

Property Values
Shape 5mm Extruded Rings
Bulk Density 0.5 Kg/Liter
Pore Volume 0.55 ml/gm
Surface Area 200 m2
Attrition Loss < 3%
Crushing Strength N/A on Extruded Surface
Catalyzing Constituent Co Mo
Process Flow Diagram
Thank You!

Got Questions?

You might also like