Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 40 views

    Projectile Motion

    Uploaded by

    Kentfhil Mae Aseron
    The document discusses projectile motion, including computations and simulations of the time of flight and range of a projectile launched at an angle of 35 degrees with an initial velocity of 25.7 m/s. The computations showed a time of flight of 3.01 seconds and range of 63.27 meters, while the simulation found 3.04 seconds and 64.75 meters respectively. An analysis found the results had marginal differences within 1 unit except for range, which differed by over 1 unit. It was concluded that computations and simulations are effective for studying projectile motion and obtaining precise results.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Projectile Motion

    Uploaded by

    Kentfhil Mae Aseron
    40 views17 pages
    The document discusses projectile motion, including computations and simulations of the time of flight and range of a projectile launched at an angle of 35 degrees with an initial velocity of 25.7 m/s. The computations showed a time of flight of 3.01 seconds and range of 63.27 meters, while the simulation found 3.04 seconds and 64.75 meters respectively. An analysis found the results had marginal differences within 1 unit except for range, which differed by over 1 unit. It was concluded that computations and simulations are effective for studying projectile motion and obtaining precise results.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses projectile motion, including computations and simulations of the time of flight and range of a projectile launched at an angle of 35 degrees with an initial velocity of 25.7 m/s. The computations showed a time of flight of 3.01 seconds and range of 63.27 meters, while the simulation found 3.04 seconds and 64.75 meters respectively. An analysis found the results had marginal differences within 1 unit except for range, which differed by over 1 unit. It was concluded that computations and simulations are effective for studying projectile motion and obtaining precise results.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    40 views17 pages

    Projectile Motion

    Uploaded by

    Kentfhil Mae Aseron
    The document discusses projectile motion, including computations and simulations of the time of flight and range of a projectile launched at an angle of 35 degrees with an initial velocity of 25.7 m/s. The computations showed a time of flight of 3.01 seconds and range of 63.27 meters, while the simulation found 3.04 seconds and 64.75 meters respectively. An analysis found the results had marginal differences within 1 unit except for range, which differed by over 1 unit. It was concluded that computations and simulations are effective for studying projectile motion and obtaining precise results.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 17

    PROJECTILE MOTION

    PROJECTILE Projectile motion is a form of motion where an object


    moves in a bilaterally symmetrical, parabolic path. The
    MOTION path that the object follows is called its trajectory.1
    GIVEN CONDITION
    GIVEN CONDITION
    B R AV O T R O O P
    Angle of Launch Initial Velocity of Projectile
    35 degrees 25.70 m/s
    COMPUTATIONS
    COMPUTATIONS
    Given Find
    Mass of projectile 46.8 kg
    Diameter of projectile 2.2 m TIME OF FLIGHT
    Angle of Launch 35 degrees and
    Initial Velocity of Launch 25.70 m/s RANGE OF PROJECTILE
    Gravity 9.8 m/s2
    COMPUTATIONS

     
    Horizontal Velocity
     
    Time to reach max. height

     
    Vertical Velocity
    COMPUTATIONS

      Time of flight   Horizontal Range


    SIMULATION
    SIMULATION
    COMPUTATION vs. SIMULATION
      Computation Simulation

    Horizontal velocity 21.05 m/s 21.30 m/s

    Time to reach max. height 1.50 s 1.52 s

    Time of flight 3.01 s 3.04 s

    Horizontal range 63.27 m 64.75 m


    ANALYSIS
    ANALYSIS
    Results  Discussion
    A brief result between the simulation and the manual With the given collected data, a discrepancy of
    computation indicated above shows a marginal results was expected. Since the simulation operates
    difference of < 1 between the data, except for the the theoretical situation into absolute measurements,
    horizontal range which differed by > 1. Furthermore, while computing restrains average values of results.
    some data such as the tflight and tmax do not vary much The discrepancy is possible but should not deviate
    in discrepancies of results, 0.2-0.4 of difference. from the range of results.  Successfully, both data
    While both data of the horizontal velocity lies in the were observed to lie within their range; thus, the
    resulted range of 21m/s, a discrepancy of 0.25 was collected data justified high accurate and precise
    observed.  results. 
    CONCLUSION
    CONCLUSION
    Thus it can be concluded that data gathering by computation and recorded simulation is effective for projectile
    motion. With the given condition of soldiers in the middle of war and asking for medical supplies, the target of
    this study was to calculate the time of the flight as well as the range of medical supplies. The result of the data
    gathered followed by the calculation revealed a marginal difference of <1 among the data except for horizontal
    range which is differed by >1. The result of the study furthermore revealed 0.25 discrepancy in the data set
    among stimulation and manual computation.
    CONCLUSION
    This study has considered the two dimensions of the projectile movement which have two components including
    vertical and horizontal velocity. Under the consideration of the trajectory of the projectile that results within the
    parabola, the research of the study gathered data with the expectations of discrepancy in result. This is because
    the approach of simulation operates the overall theoretical situation towards absolute measurement and the
    manual computation restraints on average result values. The researcher of the study expected discrepancy
    however was confident that the discrepancy related to the data on horizontal velocity should not deviate from the
    result range. However, this study and the data collection followed by the adopted procedure for the methodology
    of the study can be considered to be effective since the result of the study revealed that both the data lie among
    the anticipated range, henceforth justifying precise and effective results together with a high level of accuracy of
    the collected data set.
    REFERENCES
    1
    Moebs, W., Sanny, J., & Ling, S. J. (2016, September 19). University Physics Volume 1. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from
    https://openstax.org/books/university-physics-volume-1/pages/4-3-projectile-motion

    You might also like