Jurisprudenti AL Inquiry Model

JURISPRUDENTI
AL
INQUIRY
MODEL
WHAT IS JURISPRUDENTIAL
INQUIRY MODEL?
 Is based on the exploration and reflection of

everyday social issues that people usually
have conflicting thoughts and differences
on. The idea is that the model will help
students explore social issues, encourage
them, to question social and political forces,
encourage value clarification and practice
reflective thinking skills.
BRIEF OUTLINE/OVERVIEW
Phase 1: Orientation to the Issue
Phase 2: Identifying and Defining the
Issue
Phase 3: Synthesizing the Research
Information into Arguments
Phase 4: The Public Meeting
Phase 5: Clarification and Consensus
Phase 6: Application
Phase 1: Orientation to the Issue
The initial step of this model

introduces students to the selected issue.
This occurs on the very first day that the
topic is being studied.
Phase 1: Orientation to the Issue
 During this initial stage, the teacher must accomplish
several tasks. They include:
 Divide the class into teams of two or three students. Each team
will be assigned a side of the issue to represent in their
respective group. The purpose of the team is to cooperate in
reading, researching, and interacting on the side of the issue that
they have been assigned.
 Now arrange the teams into groups so that the number of teams
in a group equals the number of sides to the issue. Assign each
team within a group one side of the issue to represent. It is
important to do this randomly. Inevitably some students will be
assigned to a side of an issue that they do not believe in, but this
is perhaps desirable.
Phase 1I: Identifying and Defining the Issue
Students begin to use the content during the second

phase of the model. The students, working in their
cooperative teams, use the library and other resources to
gather, clarify, and synthesize facts about the issue.
Phase 1I: Identifying and Defining the Issue
 . The students begin to identify values and value conflicts and raise
questions about opposing views. The following should be considered when
entering Phase II.
◦ Prepare for an adequate number of days in the library or for working
with other resources. The teacher should be prepared to give guidance to
both the students and resource people when necessary.
◦ Allow time for the teams to be together to research, read, interview,
survey, telephone, meet , discuss the issues and what they have found,
and prepare each other for a public meeting.
◦ Students can use encyclopedias, magazines, journal articles, government
publications, people, special interest groups, and a host of other
resources. Probably the most overlooked resource will be the local or
regional newspaper. It is important for the students to understand, when
reading the newspaper, the difference between fact and opinion.
Students may assume that an editorial, because it is in the paper, is fact.
Phase III: Synthesizing the Research
At least one day prior to the public meeting, the

students get back together as an intact class. At this
point, the teacher will allow all of the teams
representing the same side of the issue to get together to
share information and prepare for the public discussion.
It is during this time that the students need to plan a
strategy for the public meeting.
Phase III: Synthesizing the Research
 . The following can be used as a guide for the students
when in the large groups.
 Establish a stance based on factual information
 Point out the undesirable or desirable consequences of a
position
 Clarify the value conflict with analogies
 Set priorities; assert priority of one value over another
 Identify factual assumptions and determine if they are
relevant
 Determine the predicted consequences and examine
their factual
 Validity (will they occur?)
Phase IV: The Public Meeting
The fourth phase of the jurisprudential inquiry

model involves the students in a mock public meeting.
This meeting involves all students in presenting the
different sides of the issue being studied..
Phase IV: The Public Meeting
It is important also for the teacher to see that the following

guidelines are followed:
 Maintain a vigorous intellectual climate where all views

are respected.
 Avoid the direct evaluation of each other’s opinions.
 See that issues are thoroughly explored.
 Respect the authority of the board.
Phase V: Clarification and Consensus
During this phase, students spend two days clarifying and arriving at
a consensus on the issue. The first day is spent with the students still
divided into the respective sides of the issue. During this time the students
clarify their best arguments in support of the side of the issue they
represented.
On the second day, students separate into their original groups. The
groups were originally constructed so that all perspectives of the issue
would be represented. The purpose of these groups is to come to a
consensus on the issue. The students should use all information available
to them in drawing their conclusions.
Phase VI: Application
The final phase of this model is the most important phase. It is

in this phase that the students take what they have learned and
apply it to their surroundings. Students must be able to see the
value in the science they have learned and see that, with this
knowledge, they can have an impact.
Phase VI: Application
 Thefirst step of this process is for each student to

propose an overall action plan with resolutions. Some of
the ways students have applied what they have learned
and became involved in community activities include:
◦ writing letters to city council, state representatives, state
senators, governors, or mayor.
◦ Leading or participating in activities such as community
cleanups, recycling activities, or petition drives.
◦ Attending city council meetings or local environmental meetings
TEACHER’S ROLE
The teacher’s role during this exercise is

important. As the students are researching,
discussing, and debating, the teacher should
encourage the students to commit themselves to
one side of the issue, but be supportive if they
change their minds when confronted with new
evidence, and encourage them to consider other
points of view. At all times, the teacher should
remain neutral on the issue, encourage
differentiation of positions, and promote synthesis
of the different positions presented to the class.
ASSIGNMENT!
In a one whole sheet of

paper, identify an issue
happening about our country
and write your
opinions/insights in a two
paragraph form.

Jurisprudenti AL Inquiry Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jurisprudenti AL Inquiry Model

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jurisprudenti AL Inquiry Model

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JURISPRUDENTI

 Is based on the exploration and reflection of

The initial step of this model

Students begin to use the content during the second

At least one day prior to the public meeting, the

The fourth phase of the jurisprudential inquiry

It is important also for the teacher to see that the following

 Maintain a vigorous intellectual climate where all views

The final phase of this model is the most important phase. It is

 Thefirst step of this process is for each student to

The teacher’s role during this exercise is

In a one whole sheet of

You might also like