Signals and Systems Assignment Help
Signals and Systems Assignment Help
Consider the LTI system with input x(t) = e u(t) and impulse
response h(t) =
P21.5
P21.6
P21.7
(b) Sketch the pole-zero plot of H(s) and plot IH(jw)| under
the following conditions.
S21.2
(a) By definition,
S21.3
Note that wherever X(s) converges, the integral defining Y(s) also
converges; thus the ROC of X(s) is the same as the ROC of Y(s).
(b) Now we study one of the most useful properties of the Laplace
transform.
Then
Suppose we are in a region of the s plane where X2(s)
converges. Then using the property shown in part (a), we have
Substituting, we have
We can associate this last integral with Xi(s) if we are also in the
ROC of xi(t). Thus Y(s) = X 2(s)Xi(s) for s inside at least the
region R, n R 2. It could happen
that the ROC is larger,but it must contain R, n
S21.4
Y(s) = X(s)H(s)
A second relation occurs due to the differential
equation. Since
Therefore,
(ii) For a causal system, the ROC must be to the right of the
rightmost pole, as shown in Figure S21.4-3.
(iii) For a system that is not causal or stable, we are left with
an ROC that is to the left of s = -1, as shown in Figure S21.4-
4.
The phase is
S21.7
(a) Let y(t) be the system response to the excitation x(t). Then
the differential equation relating y(t) to x(t) is
or
shown in Figure S21.7-1.
Figure S21.7-4 shows that the peaks are closer together and more
spread out at { = 0.5.
Figure S21.7-5 shows that at s~ 1 the poles are so close together
and far from the jw axis that IH(jw) I has a single peak.
(ii) For constant between 0 and 1, the poles are located on two
straight lines. As w, increases, the peak frequency increases as
well as the bandwidth, as indicated in Figures S21.7-6 and
S21.7-7.
(a) (i) The parallel implementation of H(s), shown in Figure
S21.8-1, can be drawn directly from the form for H(s) given in the
problem statement. The corresponding differential equations for
each section are as follows:
(ii) To generate the cascade implementation, shown in Figure
S21.8-2, w< first express H(s) as a product of second-order
sections. Thus,
Thus,
S21.9
Then
Using the transform pair given in the problem statement and the
linearity property of the Laplace transform, we have
and the ROC is Re{s) > -2. Here we have used our answer to
part (a).
(c) Since
with the same ROC as X(s), then
Thus
S21.10
(4), (7): These signals are of the form e-'" cos(wot)u(t). For
larger a, the poles are farther to the left. Hence H(jw) I for larger
a is less peaky. Thus, (4) corresponds to (f) and (7) corresponds
to (g).
(b) (a), (d): These are simple lowpass filters that correspond to
(i) or (ii). Since (a) is a steeper lowpass filter, we associate (a)
with (ii) and (d) with (i).
(b), (h): These require a null at zero, and thus could correspond
to (iii) or (viii). In the case of (iii), as wincreases, one pole-zero
pair is canceled so that for large w,H(s) looks like a lowpass
filter. Hence, (b) corresponds to (viii) and (h) corresponds to
(iii).
(c): Here we need a pole-zero plot that is an all-pass system. The
only possible pole-zero plot is (vi).
(e): Here we need a null on thejw axis, but not at w = 0. The
only possibility is (v).
(f), (g): These are resonant second-order systems that could
correspond to (iv) or (vii). Since poles closer to thejw axis lead
to peakier Fourier transforms, (f) must correspond to (iv) and (g)
to (vii).