Tpa CH13
Tpa CH13
Tpa CH13
ASSESSMENT
METHODS
CHAPTER 13
OBJECTIVE METHODS
Associated with paper-and-pencil and computer
administered personality tests
Characteristically short-answer items
Assessee selects one response from two or more
provided
Scoring done according to set procedures which do
not need judgment on the part of the scorer
FORMAT OF OBJECTIVE TESTS
Scored with reference to either the personality
characteristics being measured or the validity of
the respondent’s pattern of responses
True items indicative of the ABSENCE of the
traits as well as to items endorsed as such by
testtakers, validity of test becomes questionable
ADVANTAGES
Can be answered quickly, allowing administration
of many items covering varied aspects of the trait
or traits the test is designed to assess
Well-written items need little explanation
Can be scored quickly and reliably
Analysis and interpretation can be as fast,
especially if conducted by computer and custom
software
OBJECTIVITY AS A MATTER OF
DEBATE
What are your views about the validity of the
construct or theory?
Lack of objectivity in personality tests (self-
reports)
They actually employ a short answer format and
provide little room for discretion in terms of
scoring
PROJECTIVE METHODS
Projective hypothesis: holds that an individual
supplies structure to unstructured stimuli in a
manner consistent with the individual’s own
unique pattern of conscious and unconscious
needs, fears, desires, impulses, conflicts, and ways
of perceiving and responding.
PROJECTIVE METHOD
Technique of personality assessment in which
some judgment of the assessee’s personality is
made on the basis of performance on a task that
involves some sort of structure to unstructured or
incomplete stimuli
Inkblots, pictures, words, drawings, and other
things have been used as projective stimuli
PROJECTIVE TESTS VS. SELF-
REPORT METHODS
Indirect methods of personality assessment
Task may be to talk about something or someone
rather than himself/herself, and inferences about
the examinee’s personality are made from the
response
Ability/inclination of examinee to fake and need
for great proficiency in the English language are
greatly minimized.
LESS LINKED TO CULTURE
Minimal language skills required to respond to or
create a drawing
PROJECTIVE METHODS
The
most important things about an individual are
what he cannot or will not say. (Frank, 1939)
INKBLOTS AS PROJECTIVE
STIMULI
The Rorschach: developed by Hermann
Rorschach; form interpretation test using inkblots
as the forms to be interpreted
CONTENTIONS ABOUT THE
RORSCHACH
Less of a test and more an open and flexible arena
for studying interpersonal transactions
Exner argued that the inkblots are not completely
ambiguous; task does not necessarily force
projections and that unfortunately, the Rorschach
has been erroneously mislabeled a projective test
for far too long.
RORSCHACH
10 Cards; no test manual or any administration, scoring,
or interpretation instructions
There are a number of manuals and handbooks set forth
Exner System
RPASS System
Testing the limits (optional) enables examiner to
restructure situation by asking specific questions that
provide additional information regarding personality
functioning
PHASES OF ADMINISTRATION
First administration
Inquiry: second administration; ask what features
of the inkblot played a role in formulating the
testtaker’s percept (perception of an image)
What made it look like…
How do you see…
OTHER OBJECTIVES OF LIMIT-
TESTING PROCEDURES
Identify an confusion or misunderstanding
concerning the task
Aid examiner in determining if testtaker is able to
refocus percepts given a new frame of reference
See if a testtaker made anxious by the ambiguous
nature of the task is better able to perform given
this added structure
FORM HYPOTHESES BASED ON
Content: content category of the response (animal,
human, blood, body parts)
Location: part of the inkblot used to form the percept
Determinants: qualities of inkblot that determine what
individual perceives
Popularity: frequency of a certain response
Form: how accurately the individual’s perception
matches or fits the corresponding part of the inkblot
PICTURES AS PROJECTIVE
STIMULI
Earliest uses: Beginning of the twentieth century
Children gave responses to nine pictures; author
reported that girls were more interested in religious
and moral themes than boys were
Social Situation Picture Test: projective instrument
that contained pictures relevant to juvenile
delinquents
THEMATIC APPRECEPTION TEST
Developedby Christiana D. Morgan and Henry
Murray while working at the Harvard
Psychological Clinic in 1935
THEMATIC APPRECEPTION TEST
(TAT)
Designed as an aid to eliciting fantasy material
from patients in psychoanalysis.
Stimulus materials consist of 31 cards, 1 of them is
blank
Different types of pictures, some appear to be real
as a photo, others are surrealistic drawings
TAT MANUAL
Advised examiners to attempt to find out the
source of the examinee’s story
Apperception: derived from the verb apperceive
Apperceive: to perceive in terms of past perceptions
Source of a story could be a personal experience, a
dream, an imagined event, a book, almost anything
RAW MATERIAL USED IN DERIVING
CONCLUSIONS FROM THE TAT
Stories as they were told by the examinee
The clinician’s notes about the way or the manner
in which the examinee responded to the cards
The clinician’s notes about extra-test behavior and
verbalizations
SYSTEMS OF INTERPRETING
THEMES
Need: determinants of behavior arising from
within the individual
Press: determinants of behavior arising from
within the environment
Thema: a unit of interaction between needs and
press
IN GENERAL
Guiding principle in interpreting TAT stories
Identifying with someone (the protagonist) in the
story and that the
Needs
Environmental demands
Conflicts
Related to concerns, hopes, fears, or desires of thee
xaminee
PSYCHOMETRIC SOUNDNESS OF
TAT
Lack of standardization and uniformity in
administration, scoring, and interpretation
procedures
Inter-rater reliability coefficients ranged from
adequate to impressive
SITUATIONAL FACTORS THAT
MAY AFFECT TEST RESPONSES
Who examiner is
How test is administered
Testtaker’s experience prior to and during the test
administration
VALIDITY TAT
Same amount of motivational information could
be obtained through much simpler, self-report
methods
Little relation between TAT-derived data and that
derived from self-report
TAT-derived motivational information: Self-report
measures yielded “self-attributed motives”
TAT capable of yielding implicit motives
IMPLICIT MOTIVE
Nonconscious influence on behavior typically
acquired on the basis of experience
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
EXPRESSION OF FANTASY STORIES
AND REAL-LIFE BEHAVIOR
Tentative at best
TAT is highly susceptible to faking
VALUE OF TAT IN CLINICAL
ASSESSMENT
People would project their own motivation when
asked to construct a story from an ambiguous
stimulus
The clinician who tailors the best administration
OTHER TESTS USING PICTURES
Hand Test: 9 cards with pictures of hands on them
and a tenth blank card, imagine a pair of hands on
the card and describe what they may be doing.
Rosenzweig Picture-Frustration Study: employs
cartoons depicting frustrating situations
ROSENZWEIG PICTURE-
FRUSTRATION STUDY
Testtaker’s task is to fill in the response of the
cartoon figure being frustrated
Based on assumption that the testtaker will
identify with the person being frustrated
Available in all forms for children, adolescents,
and adults
ROSENZWEIG PICTURE-
FRUSTRATION STUDY
Scored in terms of the type of reaction elicited and
the direction of the aggression expressed:
Intropunitive: aggression turned inward
Extrapunitive: outwardly expressed
Impunitive: agression is evaded so as to avoid or
gloss over the situation
OTHER TESTS
Apperceptive Personality Test (APT): an attempt
to address some long-standing criticisms of the
TAT
Emotional tone and draw of stimulus cards
Multiple choice questions are answered after
WORDS AS PROJECTIVE STIMULI
Semi-structured techniques
Word Association Tests: Semistructured, individually
administered, projective technique; present a list of
stimulus words
WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS
Galton: consisted of presenting a series of unrelated
stimulus words and instructing the subject to
respond with the first word that came to mind
Cattell and Bryant: first to use cards with stimulus
words printed on them
Jung: by selecting key words that represented
possible areas of conflict, word association
techniques could be employed for psychodiagnostic
purposes
WORD ASSOCIATION TEST
Developed by Rapaport, Gil, and Schafer
First part: Each stimulus word was administered to the
examinee, who had been instructed to respond quickly
with the first word that came to mind; record the time it
took to respond
Second part: Each stimulus word was again presented to
the examinee; examinee instructed to reproduce original
responses
Third part: Inquiry; examiner asked questions to clarify
the relationship between stimulus word and the response
KENT-ROSANOFF FREE
ASSOCIATION TEST
One of the earliest attempts to develop a
standardized test using words as projective stimuli
100 stimulus words, all commonly used and
believed to be neutral with respect to emotional
impact
SENTENCE COMPLETION TESTS
Sentence completions stems may be developed for
use in specific types of settings or for specific
purposes
May be atheoretical or linked very closely to some
theory
ROTTER INCOMPLETE
SENTENCES BLANK
Most popular standardized sentence completion
test
Developed for use with populations from grade 9
through adulthood
Testtakers instructed to respond to each of the 40
incomplete sentence items in a way that expresses
their “real feelings.”
SOUNDS AS PROJECTIVE
STIMULI
B.F. Skinner: Like auditory inkblots?!?
Series of recorded sounds much like muffled,
spoken vowels, to which people would be
instructed to associate
Sounds packaged as a device (verbal summator)
presumably would act as a stimulus for the person to
verbalize certain unconscious material
DIFFERENT TESTS
Auditory Apperception Test: subject’s task was to
respond by creating a story based on three sounds
played on aphonograph record
Auditory Sound Association Test
Auditory Apperception Test
Developed by Henry Murray; presented subjects
with spoken paragraphs
PRODUCTION OF FIGURE
DRAWINGS
Source of information about intelligence,
neurological intactness, visual-motor coordination,
cognitive development, and even learning
disabilities
Appealing source of diagnostic data; instructions
for them can be administered individually or in a
group by nonclinicians (teachers); no materials
other than pencil and paper required
FIGURE DRAWING TEST
Projectivemethod of personality assessment
whereby the assessee produces a drawing that is
analyzed on the basis of its content and related
variables
DRAW A PERSON
Presentan 8 ½ by 11 inch white paper and tells the
examinee to draw a person
Make it the way you think it should be
Do the best you can
Draw a person of the opposite sex
DAP PRODUCTIONS
Evaluated through analysis of various characteristic of the drawing
Length of time required to complete the picture
Placement of figures
Size of figure
Pencil pressure used
Symmetry
Line quality
Shading
Presence of erasures
Facial Expressions
Posture
Clothing
Overall appearance
EXAMPLES
Placement of figure: how individual functions
within the environment
Tiny figure: poor self-concept; insecure or depressed
Picture is too large and doesn’t fit the page:
impulsive
Light pressure: character disturbance
Right of page: orientation toward future
Lower left: Depression with a desire to flee into the
past
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
DRAWING
Unusually large eyes/ears: suspiciousness, ideas of
reference, paranoid characteristics
Unusually large breasts: drawn by male, unresolved
oedipal problems with maternal dependence
Long and conspicuous ties: sexual aggressiveness,
perhaps compensating for hear of impotence
Buttons: dependent, infantile, inadequate
personality
HOUSE-TREE-PERSON
Draw a house, tree, and person
Representation of house and tree are symbolically
significant
KINETIC FAMILY DRAWING
Derived from Hulse’s Family Drawing test
Present an 8 ½ by 11 inch sheet of paper and
pencil with eraser
Draw a person doing something
Graphic representation of each family member are
analyzed
COLLABORATIVE DRAWING
TECHNIQUE
Test that provides an occasion for family members
to collaborate on the creation of a drawing –
presumably all the better to “draw together”
DRAW A PERSON: SCREENING
PROCEDURE FOR EMOTIONAL
DISTURBANCE
DAP:SPED
Standardized test administration and quantitative
scoring system designed to screen testtakers (6-17)
for emotional problems
Based on assumption that the rendering of unusual
features in figure drawings signals emotional
problems, one point scored for each such feature
FIGURE DRAWING TESTS
Although thought to be clinically useful
Embattled history in relation to psychometric
soundness
Techniques are vulnerable with regard to the
assumptions that drawings are essentially self-
representations and represent something far more
than drawing ability
CLINICAL USE OF FIGURE
DRAWINGS
Caution that test are not fool proof
A person comes across as rife with pathology in an
interview may seem benign on a psychological test
Can be considered more than tests; involve tasks
that can also serve as stepping-off points for
clients and examiners to discuss and clarify the
picture
COLOR INKBLOT THERAPEUTIC
STORYTELLING
Therapeutic method
Originally developed as a culturally responsive
assessment method for use with Japanese clients
Designed to provide an indirect, nonthreatening
approach to clients’ problems
GENOGRAM
Graphic presentation of a person’s family relationships
Therapist’s version of a family tree
Displays more information than a sample listing of
family members
Used to identify themes and patterns of behavior in a
family history
Assists client and therapist to quickly see impact of
family environment
Three or four generations
PROJECTIVE METHODS IN
PERSPECTIVE
Used enthusiastically by many clinicians
Criticized harshly by academics
Problematic scoring system
PROBLEMS WITH PROJECTIVE
TESTS
Assumptions
Situational
Variables
Psychometric considerations
ASSUMPTIONS
Stimulus material: not scientifically compelling
Idiosyncratic nature of responses evoked by
projective stimuli: same responses they may not be
as ambiguous and amenable to projection as
previously assumed
ASSUMPTIONS
Interpretation of Projective Tests
Contentions are cherished beliefs accepted without
support of sufficient research validation
Less subject ot “faking good” on the part of
testtakers
SITUATIONAL VARIABLES
Tapping personality patterns without disturbing the
pattern being tapped
Situational variables like examiner’s presence or
absence significantly affected responses of
experimental subjects
Age of examiner, presence/absence of examiner,
specific instructions, and subtle reinforcement
clues provided
IN ANY GIVEN CLINICAL
SITUATION
Variables may be placed in the mix
Interaction of these variables may influence the
clinical judgments
Simple history taking
Effect of clinician’s training
Role perspective
Patient’s social class
Motivation to manage a desired impression
PSYCHOMETRIC
CONSIDERATIONS
Uncontrolled variations in protocol length
Inappropriate subject samples
Inadequate control groups
Poor external criteria
BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT
METHODS
Behavioral Assessment: emphasizes what a person
does in situations rather than on inferences about
what attributes he has more globally
Predicting what a person will do is thought to
entail an understanding of the assessee with
respect to antecedent conditions and consequences
of a particular situation
SIGN APPROACH
More traditional administration of psychological
test or test battery to a client might yield signs that
then could be inferred to relate to the problem
Sign approach might help put client in touch with
feelings that even she was not aware of before the
assessment.
SAMPLE/BEHAVIORAL
APPROACH
Examine behavioral diary that client kept and
design an appropriate therapy program on the basis
of the records
BEHAVIOR
Focus of assessment in behavioral assessment
WHO IS ASSESSED?
Patient in a closed psychiatric ward
Client seeking help at a counseling center
Subject in an academic experiment
WHO IS THE ASSESSOR?
Highly qualified professional
Technician/assistant trained to conduct a particular
assessment
WHAT IS MEASURED
Behavior/behaviorstargeted for assessment vary
Must be measurable or quantifiable in some way
WHEN IS AN ASSESSMENT MADE
Times when the problem behavior is most likely to
be elicited
Various schedules with which behavioral
assessments may be made
TIMELINE FOLLOWBACK (TLFB)
Methodology
Method of recording the frequency and intensity of
target behavior
WHERE DOES THE ASSESSMENT
TAKE PLACE?
Preferably in the environment where the targeted
behavior is most likely to occur naturally
WHY CONDUCT BEHAVIORAL
ASSESSMENT?
Dataderived from behavioral assessment may
have advantages over data derived by other means
Provide baseline data with which other behavioral
data may be compared
Provide record of assessee’s behavioral strengths
BEHAVIOR RATING SCALE
Preprinted sheet on which the observer notes the
presence or intensity of targeted behaviors
Direct measure: applies to the setting in which the
observed behavior occurs and how closely that
setting approximates the setting in which the
behavior naturally occurs
Indirect measure: The more removed from the
natural setting, the less direct the measure
OTHER BEHAVIORAL METHODS
Self-monitoring
Analogue studies: research investigation in which one or
more variables are similar or analogous to the real
variable the investigator wishes to examine
Situational performance measure: procedure that allows
for observation and evaluation of an individual under a
standard set of circumstances
Leaderless group technique: organize people into a
group, carry out a task as an observer records information
ROLE PLAY
Acting an improvised or partially improvised part
in a simulated situation
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL
METHODS
Biofeedback: gauge, display, and record
continuous monitoring of selected biological
processes (pulse or blood pressure)
Plethysmograph: changes in blood flow
Penile Plethysmograph: designed to measure
changes of bloodflow to the penis
Polygraph
UNOBTRUSIVE MEASURE
Telling physical trace or record
ISSUES IN BEHAVIORAL
ASSESSMENT
Observer bias
Observer Error