10CBDRM-Planning
10CBDRM-Planning
10CBDRM-Planning
toyoday@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp
Sustainable Urban
Policy I
Planning Hall P. and Tewdwr-Jones M. “Urban and Regional
Planning” Fifth edition 、 Routledge 、 2011, p.3.
Earthquake
2,306
Typhoon 3,756
Cabinet
Great Hanshin-Awaji Office ( 2022 )
Fukui Earthquake 3,769 Earthquake 「 White paper of
(including indirect death): Disaster
6,437 Mnaagement (FY
Typhoon Reiwa 4) 」
Vera ( retrieved on
5,098 21/Nov/2024 ):
https://www.bousa
i.go.jp/kaigirep/ha
kusho/r04/honbun
1958
1995
1945
1959
2022
2011
/3b_6s_07_00.htm
l
Year 5
Why community?
• First responder to disasters
• With knowledge of the vulnerabilities and capacities of the
locality
• Main actors to manage emergency shelters and thereafter
↓
Importance of community-based disaster management programs
attributed to
-the participation of the community
6
-theand
Toyoda Yusuke involvement of different
Kanegae Hidehiko ‘A Community groups
Evacuation Planning Modelof people
against Urban Earthquakes’ Regional Science
Association International “Regional Science, Policy and Practice” Volume 6, Issue 3, August 2014, pp. 231-249,
DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12036.
Present Situation
• Promoting community-based disaster mitigation is
essential
8
Source: Adapted from Shoji (2011) (Raw data were quoted from Fire Disaster Management Agency
[2004, 2007, 2009])
Figure: Changes in the numbers and organized ratio of Community-
2. Three Approaches
Three approaches (Pyramid of
Involvement)
Implementing effective community-based DM
activities with a limited number of participants
2. To enhance
1. To realize
awareness and
effective disaster
promoting take
learning
actions for
contents/methods
disaster
management
11
3. Community-based Disaster
Mitigation
(a case study on community
evacuation)
Process of Risk
Management
• Risk Assessment
1
• Risk Communication
2
• Risk Management
3
13
Kanegae Hidehiko and Toyoda Yusuke ‘Making Use of Disaster Experience as Lessons: Learning Disaster with Recognition and
Sharing by Gaming’ ‘Text: Theory of Disaster Mitigation of Cultural Heritage’ Publishing Committee of Ritsumeikan University,
“Text: Theory of Disaster Mitigation of Cultural Heritage” Gakugei-Shuppan Publisher, March, 2013, pp. 131-146 (in Japanese),
ISBN 978-4-7615-2549-1.
Risk Assessment
Individual Risk
Individual Risk
Individual Risk Individual Risk
14
Risk Communication
Community Risk
Individual Risk
Individual Risk
Individual Risk Individual Risk
15
Risk Communication
Community Risk
Individual Risk
Individual Risk
Individual Risk Individual Risk
16
Risk Management
Community Risk
17
Construction of
Community
Evacuation Systems
Toyoda Yusuke and Kanegae Hidehiko ‘A Community Evacuation Planning Model against Urban
Earthquakes’ Regional Science Association International “Regional Science, Policy and Practice” (Wiley)
Volume 6, Issue 3, August 2014, pp. 231-249, DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12036.
Toyoda Yusuke, Kanegae Hidehiko and Sakai Kohei ‘Gaming Simulation for Community-Based Disaster
Reduction’ Kriz, C. Willy (Eds.) “The Shift from Teaching to Learning: Individual, Collective and
Organizational Learning through Gaming Simulation” W. Bertelsmann Verlag, July, 2014, pp. 330-344,
Community-based Disaster
Management Framework for
Community Evacuation
Environment Systems
Present Situation
Construct Systems
Assessing
Environment
& Systems
19
Community-based Disaster
Management Framework for
Community Evacuation
Environment Systems
Disaster
Present Situation Map
Construct Systems
Making
Assessing
Environment
& Systems
20
Disaster Map Making
Risk Assessment
Risk Communication
21
Disaster Map Making
Temporary
Evacuation
Site
Evacuation
Route
Fire
Extinguisher
Fire Bucket
Fire Hydrant
Vacant
Residence
Bridge
Manhole
Evacuation Map 43
Brock Fence
illustrating the community evacuation systems
22
Community-based Disaster
Management Framework for
Community Evacuation
Environment Systems
Disaster
Present Situation Map
Construct Systems
Making
Assessing
Environment
& Systems
23
Assessment
of Community
Evacuation
Environment
Community-based Disaster
Management Framework for
Community Evacuation
Environment Systems
Disaster
Present Situation
Map
Construct Systems
Making
DIG: Assessing
Disaster Environment
Imagination & Systems
Game
25
DIG (Disaster Imagination
Game)
Making use of the disaster map
↓
Putting necessary information on the map
(water source, narrow streets, etc)
26
27
DIG (Disaster Imagination
Game)
Making use of the disaster map
↓
Putting necessary information on the map
(water source, narrow streets, etc)
↓
Giving scenario which the community would
face in disaster
28
Evacuation, Fire, Rescue
29
DIG (Disaster Imagination
Game)
Making use of the disaster map
↓
Putting necessary information on the map (water
source, narrow streets, etc)
↓
Giving scenario which the community would face in
disaster
↓
Letting participants discuss what to do, what to
prepare, etc.
↓
Finding problems in the community 30
DIG (Disaster Imagination
Game)
31
DIG (Disaster Imagination
Game)
No tool/equipment to rescue
↓
Preparing disaster warehouse in a temple
by asking equal donation from residents
↓
Storing tools/equipment by borrowing from
residents first
↓
Keeping collecting donation and buying
tools/equipments
32
Assessment of
Community
Evacuation
Systems
Community-based Disaster
Management Framework for
Community Evacuation
Environment System2
Present Situation
Disaster
Construct Systems Map
Making
DIG
Simulation Simulation EST:
Assessing Assessing Evacuation
Environment Systems Simulation
Training
34
EST: EVACUATION SIMULATION
TRAINING
Participants are
• To be assigned their roles
• To evacuate from their houses
• To encounter situations after
earthquake
• To reach their wider evacuation
space
35
Rule
• To follow their roles
36
Role 1
37
Role 2
38
Situation 1
Source: 39
Map for the training
40
Learning model
Individual Individual Individual
evacuation from evacuation from evacuation from ・・・
house (role) house (role) house (role)
Risk
41
Reducing important and/or urgent risks management
Briefing
42
Game
43
Debriefing
44
Risk Assessment in the
systems 1
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary House of
Evacuation Site Resident a
45
Risk Assessment in the
systems 1
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary House of
Evacuation Site Resident a
46
Risk Assessment in the
systems 1
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary House of
Evacuation Site Resident a
47
Risk Assessment in the
systems 1
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary House of
Evacuation Site Resident a
48
Risk Assessment in the
systems 2
Evacuation
Shelter
?
Temporary House of
Evacuation Resident
Site b
49
Risk Assessment in the
systems 3
House of
Evacuation
Resident
Shelter c
Temporary
Evacuation
Site
50
Risk Communication
(Debriefing)
Two of the decisions:
Making the list of residents to know who
comes to the temporary evacuation places
and sharing the list with ones provided their
info
Present Situation
Disaster
Construct Systems Map
Making
DIG EST
Simulation Simulation
Assessing Assessing
Environment Systems
52
Other GS or disaster-related
games
EST for school students:
Toyoda Yusuke ‘Gaming Simulations as the Medium for Disaster Education in Schools and Community-based Disaster Risk
Reduction’ Society for Social Management Systems “Internet Journal of Society for Social Management Systems” Vol.11,
Issue 2, July, 2018, pp. 80-90, ISBN: 2432-552X: https://ssms.jp/img/files/2019/04/sms17_1677.pdf
Crossroad:
Some description: https://bekobe.smartkobe-portal.com/interview/en/2016/01/1679/index.html
Saske-nable:
Otsuki, S., Amano, K., Harada, M., Kitamura, I., Rem J., Sadaike, Y., & Mimura, S. (2016). Development of SASKE-NABLE: A
Simulation Game Utilizing Lessons from the Great East japan Earthquake. In Kaneda T, Kanegae H, Toyoda Y, Rizzi P
(Eds.). Simulation and Gaming in the Network Society (pp. 323-338). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
53
Three approaches (Pyramid of
Involvement)
Implementing effective community-based DM
activities with a limited number of participants
1. To enhance
2. To realize
awareness and
effective disaster
promoting take
learning
actions for
contents/methods
disaster
management
54
Three approaches (Pyramid of
Involvement)
55
Why community?
• First responder to disasters
• With knowledge of the vulnerabilities and capacities of the
locality
• Main actors to manage emergency shelters and thereafter
↓
Importance of community-based disaster management programs
attributed to
-the participation of the community
56
-the involvement of different groups of people
Toyoda Yusuke and Kanegae Hidehiko ‘A Community Evacuation Planning Model against Urban Earthquakes’ Regional Science
Association International “Regional Science, Policy and Practice” Volume 6, Issue 3, August 2014, pp. 231-249,
DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12036.
Legitimate Peripheral
Participation (LPP)
Explaining: How newcomers become experienced
members and eventually old timers of a community of
practice or collaborative project
Legitimate=???
Peripheral=???
Legitimate=Real
Peripheral=Variety
61
Disaster Sport Festival
• Incorporating into community event, etc.
Have more observers and more potential participants]
• Promoting Participation
Approach to Kids and their parents
Raise awareness and social capital
Passive participants
Toyoda Yusuke ‘A Study on Intention of the Age of Maturity to Participate in Local Disaster Management
Activities with Emphasis on Easiness’ Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science “Journal of Natural Disaster
Science” Vol.39, No.4, February 2021, pp. 391-406, DOI: 10.24762/jndsj.39.4_391 (in Japanese). 63
• Theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991)
Risk as Feeling Model (Loewenstein, et al. 2001)
65
Conceptual Model
Holding festivals, events attracting
them
1. To become
2. To enhance active
awareness and members by
promoting take enhancing
actions for awareness
disaster and/or
management enhancing
social capital
66
Three approaches (Pyramid of
Involvement)
68
Evacuation in local communities
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary
Evacuation Site
69
Evacuation in local communities
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary
Evacuation Site
70
Evacuation in local communities
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary
Evacuation Site
71
Evacuation in local communities
Evacuation Shelter
Temporary
Evacuation Site