This presentation has been prepared for the CONCORD Workshop on QUality and Effectiveness held on 6 -7 December 2012. Feel free to copy it, use it, develop your own tools...and just let us know about it. :)
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 16
More Related Content
Similar to FoRS Code on Effectiveness, Peer Reviews and Development Coffee
Valuing organizational vision in the development of performance measurement f...Fbertrand
The document discusses two projects to develop performance measurement frameworks for science-based organizations based on their organizational visions.
For a provincial RTO aiming to be a world leader in innovation for its main client, the project used a focused and participatory approach, developing 25 indicators aligned with its strategic plan through workshops.
For a federal RTO aiming to be a top five global RTO, the project took an exploratory and comparative approach, profiling over 100 indicators used by peer RTOs and developing a benchmarking strategy through international consultations.
Key lessons highlighted how an organization's vision influences the project approach, methods and results, and implications for implementing and using the performance frameworks.
1) Joint monitoring involves the managing authority of an ENPI CBC program, the ENPI CBC headquarters, and potentially local government authorities conducting monitoring visits and producing joint reports together.
2) Joint monitoring can generate better information about whether projects are achieving expected results through collaborative analysis. It also promotes ownership of results among managing partners.
3) Effective joint monitoring requires advance planning and agreement between stakeholders on procedures, field visits, and report production. It emphasizes learning through practical experience.
The document discusses result-based communications and evaluation of public policy communication activities. It provides examples of measuring inputs, outputs, results, outcomes, and impacts. Key requirements for evaluation include easy access to data, coherent presentation, and setting SMART objectives. Success requires a broad skill set, well-defined methodology, and participatory approach. Case studies demonstrate evaluating existing strategies and designing new plans and websites for public organizations.
The document discusses the experience and lessons learned from the Harmonization for Health in Africa Communities of Practice. It defines communities of practice and notes their growing use in global health. CoPs address silos between actors like researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and bring them together. Key elements include informal networks, knowledge sharing activities both online and in-person, and a strong sense of community. Lessons include targeting relationships, combining virtual and in-person interactions, focusing on evidence-based implementation, and the importance of facilitation. The big challenges are maintaining relevance, driving behavior change, and turning passive into active participation.
This document provides an overview of project management certification and accreditation. It discusses the history of project management as a discipline and how it has evolved over time. It also summarizes several project management approaches, standards, and certifications from the Project Management Institute (PMI), including the PMP certification. The benefits of PMI membership are highlighted.
Evaluating an open research project: Benefits and challenges from the ROER4D ...SarahG_SS
Presentation made at the Open Education Global 2017 Conference held at the CTICC from 8-10 March 2017. This presentation looked at the the evaluation of the ROER4D project, a project that is committed to open research. The open approach in the project work informed the evaluation approach used and has highlighted considerations around the ethical sharing of evaluation findings and outputs, including at which stage and with whom. Some of the benefits and challenges of evaluating such an open project are presented.
The ROER4D project evaluates the use and impact of open educational resources in the Global South. It uses a utilization-focused evaluation framework where the evaluations are centered around the intended use by intended users. Some benefits of this open approach include an inclusive team dynamic and opportunities to adapt. Key challenges include the fact that some evaluation work cannot always be fully open due to issues of propriety, and differences in time zones and technologies between project members. The evaluation work aims to balance open sharing with carefully considering what can be shared and when.
The universal standards for social performance management (USSPM) are a set of management standards for microfinance institutions to help them achieve social goals in addition to financial sustainability. The standards were developed through broad industry consultation and establish clear requirements for policies, procedures, and operations to achieve social missions. They are organized into six categories and were revised based on feedback from hundreds of stakeholders. Next steps involve creating diagnostic indicators and benchmarks to assess implementation of each standard through working groups and a public comment period before the completed standards are launched in June 2012.
The document describes implementing Web 2.0 and 3.0 technologies using a community-based approach through Communities of Practice (CoPs). It outlines the process for establishing a CoP, including initiation, planning, activation, execution, monitoring, and closure. Key roles in a CoP include the practice area owner, sponsor, moderator, experts, and members who work toward goals and share knowledge.
This presentation and all staff (125+) member conversation by the Bonner Network involved exploring how higher education service programs can incorporate more democratic community engagement. It also shared the evolving model for community partner capacity building and development. This session occurred at the Bonner Foundation's Fall Directors Meeting 2011. For more info see bonnernetwork.pbworks.com
Composition and initiation of agricultural innovation platformsILRI
Presented by Iddo Dror at the SEARCA Forum-workshop on Platforms, Rural Advisory Services, and Knowledge Management: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Agricultural and Rural Development, Los Banos, 17-19 May 2016
EU Space Research Program @ Stanford - Burton Lee - How To Find Partners and ...Burton Lee
"Partnering with European Space Organizations: The EU Space Proposal Evaluation & Selection Process”, presented by Burton Lee, Stanford University, July 21 2010
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ...ROER4D
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji and Sarah Goodier
ROER4D Communications and Evaluation Advisors
Presentation for DECI-2 workshop
Cape Town, 4 May 2016
Reflections on developing an evaluation and communications strategy for the R...SarahG_SS
A joint presentation given at the DECI-2 Workshop held in Cape Town on 3-5 May 2016. This presentation briefly outlines the ROER4D project and then briefly explores the evaluation and communications strategy. This presentation also gives feedback to the DECI-2 project on what worked and some sugestions for improvement in their mentoring process of the ROER4D project.
The document discusses requirements gathering and its importance for project success. It notes that 70-80% of project failures can be attributed to poor requirements gathering, analysis, and management. The document outlines five key components of effective requirements gathering: 1) gathering requirements before defining scope, 2) identifying project and product requirements, 3) adequately documenting requirements, 4) selecting the appropriate methodology, and 5) engaging diverse users. It emphasizes that requirements gathering provides the foundation for building project scope, plans, and risk mitigation strategies.
The document discusses a vision for a future knowledge management framework. Most statements addressed how to integrate local and end-user knowledge through participation and collaboration. Many envisioned a framework that evaluates existing information, provides guidance on lessons learned, and uses IT systems to support knowledge sharing among diverse stakeholder groups. There was also discussion of ensuring knowledge management solutions are tailored to individual communities and contexts rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
USAID Knowledge Management Building Blocksgvaughan
This document summarizes a World Bank knowledge sharing event on building blocks and stumbling blocks for knowledge management. The event included panel presentations on various frameworks related to KM, including culture, change management, governance, and measurement. It then outlined small group discussion tasks for participants to discuss the implications of these frameworks based on their experiences. The overall goal was to share perspectives on KM and develop recommendations to improve how knowledge is managed and shared within organizations and across networks.
Similar to FoRS Code on Effectiveness, Peer Reviews and Development Coffee (20)
Impacts of Czech cancer-fighting projects in Georgia and Serbia: lessons for ...Inka Pibilova
The goal of the article is to offer lessons learned on how to share what can be considered “transition experience” with countries in the Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership among others, in order to have a real impact on people’s lives. The author concludes that the Czech Republic, and other Visegrad countries, should share transition experience in areas where they have achieved evident progress and gained significant know-how which they are able to share. At the same time, such experience sharing has to be needs-based and complementary to other development efforts in partner countries. Based on the international recognition of the progress of the Czech Republic and on the evidence from two evaluations discussed in the article, women’s cancer prevention and treatment seem to be a great example of a well-chosen transition experience shared with the Czech partner countries of Georgia and Serbia. Yet, for similar projects in the future, it is necessary to reflect on the key local influencing factors; to understand exactly how each project will work and remain flexible throughout the project cycle; to focus on actual impacts and to accept accountability, and finally to practice evidence-based, consistent, long-term advocacy to achieve systemic changes.
Published in the peer-reviewed journal International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs, Vol. XXV No. 3-4 | 2016, titled "Is there a shared transitional experience?"
Evaluace českého onkologickéo projektu v Srbsku 2015 Inka Pibilova
Projekt Podpora prevence rakoviny u žen v regionu Šumadija realizovala Charita Česká republika (ČR) a Oaza Sigurnosti v Srbsku v letech 2010 až 2012 jako veřejnou zakázku. Celkové náklady ve výši 10,5 mil. CZK (552 632 USD) financovala Česká rozvojová agentura (ČRA, anglicky CZDA). Od června do října 2015 proběhla externí evaluace projektu, kterou zadalo Ministerstvo zahraničních věcí (MZV, anglicky MFA) a kterou realizoval evaluační tým společnosti Naviga4. Hlavní zjištění a závěry k evaluaci projektu jsou uvedeny v prezentaci. Celá zpráva je k dispozici zde: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/rozvojova_spoluprace/dvoustranna_zrs_cr/evaluace/index.html.
Participativní plánování, monitoring a evaluaceInka Pibilova
Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation workshop for education, development and humanitarian Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) associated in FoRS
Monitoring zamereny na vysledky a evaluace Inka Pibilova
This is a presentation from workshop on results-oriented monitoring and evaluation of Czech development cooperation projects. The workshop was held primarily for the Czech Development Agency by the Czech Evaluation Society.
Please mention the source if you plan to share any slides further. Thank you.
How European Civil Society Organisations Strive for their Development Effecti...Inka Pibilova
This brief provides a short overview of key global and European initiatives on Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) Development Effectiveness and mentions key challenges. Further, it shows concrete examples of how European CSOs have put the Istanbul Principles into practice since 2011. It serves as one of the inputs for the High Level Meeting in Mexico in April 2014, focusing on progress in development effectiveness since Busan. It will also serve as a basis for subsequent work on CSO development effectiveness in European NGO Confederation for Relief and Development - CONCORD and the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness (CPDE).
How European CSOs strive for their development effectivenessInka Pibilova
Examples how European civil society organisations implemented Istanbul principles and enhanced transprancy, partnership and others. Presented on behalf of CONCORD Europe at the CSO Forum in Mexico on 14 April 2014 organised by the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness... ahead of the High Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation.
Prevence přenosu HIV z matek na děti v KeniInka Pibilova
Evaluace projektu Magny Deti v núdzi. Díky komplexní zdravotní a psychosociální péči se snížil přenos HIV/AIDS z matek na děti z asi 25 - 50 % na přibližně 5 %.
Kompletní evaluační zpráva je k dispozici na http://www.evaluace.com/portfolio-item/prevence-prenosu-hiv-z-matek-na-deti-v-keni/?lang=cs.
Evaluation of a project on HIV transmission from mothers to children in Kenya by Magna Children at Risk. Thanks to complex health and psychosocial support, the transmission from mothers with HIV/AIDS to their children reduced from about 25 - 50 % to around 5 %.
Introduction to project evaluations for SLOGA / TrialogInka Pibilova
This document summarizes the key points from a workshop on project evaluations. The workshop covered:
1) An introduction to project evaluations and the project cycle.
2) Discussion of evaluation criteria like relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Quantitative and qualitative indicators were also covered.
3) Methods for data collection, developing evaluation questions, and analyzing qualitative data. Key points on developing terms of reference for evaluations were also provided.
Monitoring and evaluation of human rights projectsInka Pibilova
This document provides information about monitoring and evaluating human rights projects. It discusses the differences between evaluation, monitoring, and auditing. Evaluation assesses project effectiveness, impact, and sustainability for learning and accountability. Monitoring analyzes ongoing project progress toward planned results to improve management. The document also outlines why monitoring and evaluation are important, the project cycle, stakeholder analysis, problem trees, objectives, indicators, risks analysis, and tools for monitoring and evaluating projects.
Using Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles to evaluate a health ...Inka Pibilova
This presentation shows how Istanbul CSO Development Effectiveness Principles can be used to evaluate a health project in Georgia. The full evaluation report as per OECD / DAC criteria is available here in English and Czech: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/rozvojova_spoluprace/dvoustranna_zrs_cr/evaluace/evaluacni_zpravy/evaluacni_zprava_gruzie_zdravotnictvi_1.html
How to plan EC-funded projects? find a compilation of a presentation, handouts and additional tips from a workshop for civil society organisations held in Bratislava on 4 June 2013.
The most significant change as a part of a project evaluation in indiaInka Pibilova
This document describes an evaluation of an education project in India that was funded by donations to rebuild and improve schools after the 2004 tsunami. The evaluation objectives were to show the project's impact on education access, quality and environment. It also aimed to assess sustainability after funding ended. Due to limitations, the evaluation used a methodology called "Most Significant Change," collecting stories from community volunteers about the most impactful changes, such as empowering child clubs to improve water and sanitation. The most significant change found was increased empowerment of children. However, communication of findings was limited due to the donor not publishing the report. Lessons included using stories to communicate success and ensuring stakeholders are engaged in evaluating and communicating results.
Pribehy nejvetsich zmen v ramci evaluace projektu v indiiInka Pibilova
Prezentace v konference České evaluační společnosti 2013 o tom, jak metoda nejvýznamnějších změn může odkrýt i neočekávané dopady a zjistit hodnoty zapojených lidí.
Lessons learnt from evaluations of Development Education / Awareness Raising ...Inka Pibilova
This document outlines lessons learned from evaluations of the NSALA Project. It recommends investing in an initial assessment to understand the context and stakeholders. The evaluation process should start by defining the intended results and work backwards. Key steps in the evaluation include an inception phase to define objectives, stakeholders and questions, followed by field research such as interviews, surveys and focus groups. Findings are reported in a draft evaluation report that is shared with partners for comment before a final report. Understanding the evaluation context, strengths, learning needs and vision of partners is also important. Further resources on evaluation methodologies and principles are suggested for additional learning.
Poučení z evaluací vzdělávacích projektůInka Pibilova
Poučení z evaluací globálních vzdělávacích projektů a programů českých nevládních neziskových organizací realizovaných v ČR i zahraničí. Evaluace proběhly zejména v roce 2012.
Evaluace projektu prevence a léčby HIV v KeniInka Pibilova
Příklad evaluace projektu neziskové organizace z workshopu Jak mohou neziskové organizace a akademická sféra pomoci realizovat efektivnější projekty (aneb evaluace v teorii a zejména v praxi) v rámci konference Věda v akci 25. 10. 2012
---------------------
An example of an NGO project evaluation from the workshop How can NGOs and universities help to implement more ffective projects (evaluations in theory and practice), held as a part of the conference Science in Action on 25 October 2012.
Principles of Roods Approach!!!!!!!.pptxibtesaam huma
Principles of Rood’s Approach
Treatment technique used in physiotherapy for neurological patients which aids them to recover and improve quality of life
Facilitatory techniques
Inhibitory techniques
Beyond the Advance Presentation for By the Book 9John Rodzvilla
In June 2020, L.L. McKinney, a Black author of young adult novels, began the #publishingpaidme hashtag to create a discussion on how the publishing industry treats Black authors: “what they’re paid. What the marketing is. How the books are treated. How one Black book not reaching its parameters casts a shadow on all Black books and all Black authors, and that’s not the same for our white counterparts.” (Grady 2020) McKinney’s call resulted in an online discussion across 65,000 tweets between authors of all races and the creation of a Google spreadsheet that collected information on over 2,000 titles.
While the conversation was originally meant to discuss the ethical value of book publishing, it became an economic assessment by authors of how publishers treated authors of color and women authors without a full analysis of the data collected. This paper would present the data collected from relevant tweets and the Google database to show not only the range of advances among participating authors split out by their race, gender, sexual orientation and the genre of their work, but also the publishers’ treatment of their titles in terms of deal announcements and pre-pub attention in industry publications. The paper is based on a multi-year project of cleaning and evaluating the collected data to assess what it reveals about the habits and strategies of American publishers in acquiring and promoting titles from a diverse group of authors across the literary, non-fiction, children’s, mystery, romance, and SFF genres.
(T.L.E.) Agriculture: Essentials of GardeningMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏.𝟎)-𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐬
Lesson Outcome:
-Students will understand the basics of gardening, including the importance of soil, water, and sunlight for plant growth. They will learn to identify and use essential gardening tools, plant seeds, and seedlings properly, and manage common garden pests using eco-friendly methods.
Split Shifts From Gantt View in the Odoo 17Celine George
Odoo allows users to split long shifts into multiple segments directly from the Gantt view.Each segment retains details of the original shift, such as employee assignment, start time, end time, and specific tasks or descriptions.
AI Risk Management: ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act, and ISO/IEC 23894PECB
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, understanding the complexities and regulations regarding AI risk management is more crucial than ever.
Amongst others, the webinar covers:
• ISO/IEC 42001 standard, which provides guidelines for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving AI management systems within organizations
• insights into the European Union's landmark legislative proposal aimed at regulating AI
• framework and methodologies prescribed by ISO/IEC 23894 for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks associated with AI systems
Presenters:
Miriama Podskubova - Attorney at Law
Miriama is a seasoned lawyer with over a decade of experience. She specializes in commercial law, focusing on transactions, venture capital investments, IT, digital law, and cybersecurity, areas she was drawn to through her legal practice. Alongside preparing contract and project documentation, she ensures the correct interpretation and application of European legal regulations in these fields. Beyond client projects, she frequently speaks at conferences on cybersecurity, online privacy protection, and the increasingly pertinent topic of AI regulation. As a registered advocate of Slovak bar, certified data privacy professional in the European Union (CIPP/e) and a member of the international association ELA, she helps both tech-focused startups and entrepreneurs, as well as international chains, to properly set up their business operations.
Callum Wright - Founder and Lead Consultant Founder and Lead Consultant
Callum Wright is a seasoned cybersecurity, privacy and AI governance expert. With over a decade of experience, he has dedicated his career to protecting digital assets, ensuring data privacy, and establishing ethical AI governance frameworks. His diverse background includes significant roles in security architecture, AI governance, risk consulting, and privacy management across various industries, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: June 26, 2024
Tags: ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 23894
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Front Desk Management in the Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
Front desk officers are responsible for taking care of guests and customers. Their work mainly involves interacting with customers and business partners, either in person or through phone calls.
Delegation Inheritance in Odoo 17 and Its Use CasesCeline George
There are 3 types of inheritance in odoo Classical, Extension, and Delegation. Delegation inheritance is used to sink other models to our custom model. And there is no change in the views. This slide will discuss delegation inheritance and its use cases in odoo 17.
How to Add Colour Kanban Records in Odoo 17 NotebookCeline George
In Odoo 17, you can enhance the visual appearance of your Kanban view by adding color-coded records using the Notebook feature. This allows you to categorize and distinguish between different types of records based on specific criteria. By adding colors, you can quickly identify and prioritize tasks or items, improving organization and efficiency within your workflow.
Lecture_Notes_Unit4_Chapter_8_9_10_RDBMS for the students affiliated by alaga...Murugan Solaiyappan
Title: Relational Database Management System Concepts(RDBMS)
Description:
Welcome to the comprehensive guide on Relational Database Management System (RDBMS) concepts, tailored for final year B.Sc. Computer Science students affiliated with Alagappa University. This document covers fundamental principles and advanced topics in RDBMS, offering a structured approach to understanding databases in the context of modern computing. PDF content is prepared from the text book Learn Oracle 8I by JOSE A RAMALHO.
Key Topics Covered:
Main Topic : DATA INTEGRITY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING A TABLE AND INDEX
Sub-Topic :
Data Integrity,Types of Integrity, Integrity Constraints, Primary Key, Foreign key, unique key, self referential integrity,
creating and maintain a table, Modifying a table, alter a table, Deleting a table
Create an Index, Alter Index, Drop Index, Function based index, obtaining information about index, Difference between ROWID and ROWNUM
Target Audience:
Final year B.Sc. Computer Science students at Alagappa University seeking a solid foundation in RDBMS principles for academic and practical applications.
About the Author:
Dr. S. Murugan is Associate Professor at Alagappa Government Arts College, Karaikudi. With 23 years of teaching experience in the field of Computer Science, Dr. S. Murugan has a passion for simplifying complex concepts in database management.
Disclaimer:
This document is intended for educational purposes only. The content presented here reflects the author’s understanding in the field of RDBMS as of 2024.
Feedback and Contact Information:
Your feedback is valuable! For any queries or suggestions, please contact muruganjit@agacollege.in
How to Store Data on the Odoo 17 WebsiteCeline George
Here we are going to discuss how to store data in Odoo 17 Website.
It includes defining a model with few fields in it. Add demo data into the model using data directory. Also using a controller, pass the values into the template while rendering it and display the values in the website.
Ardra Nakshatra (आर्द्रा): Understanding its Effects and RemediesAstro Pathshala
Ardra Nakshatra, the sixth Nakshatra in Vedic astrology, spans from 6°40' to 20° in the Gemini zodiac sign. Governed by Rahu, the north lunar node, Ardra translates to "the moist one" or "the star of sorrow." Symbolized by a teardrop, it represents the transformational power of storms, bringing both destruction and renewal.
About Astro Pathshala
Astro Pathshala is a renowned astrology institute offering comprehensive astrology courses and personalized astrological consultations for over 20 years. Founded by Gurudev Sunil Vashist ji, Astro Pathshala has been a beacon of knowledge and guidance in the field of Vedic astrology. With a team of experienced astrologers, the institute provides in-depth courses that cover various aspects of astrology, including Nakshatras, planetary influences, and remedies. Whether you are a beginner seeking to learn astrology or someone looking for expert astrological advice, Astro Pathshala is dedicated to helping you navigate life's challenges and unlock your full potential through the ancient wisdom of Vedic astrology.
For more information about their courses and consultations, visit Astro Pathshala.
Understanding and Interpreting Teachers’ TPACK for Teaching Multimodalities i...Neny Isharyanti
Presented as a plenary session in iTELL 2024 in Salatiga on 4 July 2024.
The plenary focuses on understanding and intepreting relevant TPACK competence for teachers to be adept in teaching multimodality in the digital age. It juxtaposes the results of research on multimodality with its contextual implementation in the teaching of English subject in the Indonesian Emancipated Curriculum.
"DANH SÁCH THÍ SINH XÉT TUYỂN SỚM ĐỦ ĐIỀU KIỆN TRÚNG TUYỂN ĐẠI HỌC CHÍNH QUY ...
FoRS Code on Effectiveness, Peer Reviews and Development Coffee
1. Workshop on Quality and Effectiveness,
Brussels 6 - 7 December 2012
Building capacities of Czech
development CSOs based on the
FoRS Code on Effectiveness
Inka Píbilová
inka@evaluace.com
3. Code on Effectiveness *2011
1. Grassroots knowledge
2. Transparency and accountability
3. Partnership
4. Respect to human rights and gender equality
5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability
www.FoRS.cz > Members and Observers > FoRS Code in EN
http://www.fors.cz/user_files/fors_code_on_effectiveness_en.pdf
4. Code on Effectiveness – Example:
http://www.fors.cz/user_files/fors_code_on_effectiveness_en.pdf
5. Code on Effectiveness Annual Selfevaluation
1. Grassroots knowledge
Validating data in the field ! Publish strategic priorities online
! Contribute to FoRS working groups
2. Transparency and accountability
Most info incl. contacts on-line ! Publish funding / financial info
Refusing corruption in fundraising
3. Partnership
Mutual capacity building ! Sharing project docs, other projects
4. Respect to human rights and gender equality
Avoiding stereotypes
Not using pictures of extreme suffering for fundraising
5. Accountability for impacts and their sustainability
! Impact indicators missing ! Lack of participatory evaluations
! lack of target groups´ opinions in eval. reports ! Accountability for impacts!
6. Code on Effectiveness Annual Selfevaluation
• How to make assessment more
objective?
• How to build capacities of CSOs
beside workshops? Development
• How to enhance sharing expertise Coffee
of the platform members?
• How to involve small, volunteer-
based organisations, with highly
limited resources? Peer Reviews
• How to promote the guidelines
beyond the platform?
• … And how to do it with minimum
costs?
9. DevelopmentCoffee.org
Themes:
•How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty
reduction around the world?
•What are the stereotypes in development cooperation?
•How to ensure positive impacts of projects?
•What are the new trends in development cooperation? (social
media)
Speakers:
•Leading Czech development CSOs
•Business Platform for Development Cooperation
•Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or
•Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong
9
10. DevelopmentCoffee.org
Key features:
•Democratic themes proposal and selection (crowdsourcing)
•Use of social media, but regular meetings are essential
•Different hosting organisations
•Informal debate in an atmosphere of trust
•Concrete stories of good / bad practice
•Enhanced networking among CSOs, government officials,
students, private sector
Challenges:
•Ownership of the process after co-founders left
•Need for outputs for wider dissemination
•Need for evaluation of outcomes
10
11. Peer Review – Quick version
DWW Bilateral
peer
review
FoRS Code of
Effectiveness
Self-assessment
11
12. Peer Review – Strategic approach
WG1
Final
Briefing workshop
WG2
ToR & report
WG3
Interested FoRS Code of
Peers Effectiveness
Self-assessment
12
13. Peer Reviews
Key features:
•Concrete objectives
•Based on a framework (FoRS Code on Effectiveness)
•Looking at concrete evidence
•Building on what the organisation is good at
•Voluntary (focus, peers selection)
•Trusted peers with versatile background
•Platform facilitating the process and networking
Challenges:
•Realistic objectives
•Buy-in and dedication across organisational hierarchy
•Sufficient time to discuss the evidence of principles and reach
set objectives.
•„New“ priorities during the peer review process 13
14. Conclusions
Czech CSOs (and others!) are DevelopmentCoffee.org
interested in sharing and and
evaluating their effectiveness,
Peer Reviews
provided they:
• transform the FoRS Code to a
• see benefits for their work,
capacity building rather than
• have a clear framework with
repression tool,
specific, meaningful • use the wide expertise of the
indicators,
FoRS membership,
• own the process, • are quick, easy & cheap to set-
• have sufficient resources to
up and run,
reflect and • use social media, but do not
• are systematically
replace personal contacts,
supported (FoRS Working • are fully driven by target
Group and Secretariat).
groups.
15. Actions for 2013
• Peer reviews among 9 CSOs
• Further implementation of FoRS Code of Effectiveness
• Revitalizing and adding FoRS Working Groups
• Workshops and Summer School on preferred themes
(PM&E, communication)
• Evidence-based analysis of CSOs´ effects and impacts for
Czech policy making
• Involvement in CPDE?
16. Thank you for your attention!
Inka Píbilová (methodology)
inka@evaluace.com www.evaluace.com
Jan Bohm (social media)
me@janbohm.cz www.siriri.org
Daniel Svoboda (CSO development effectiveness)
svoboda@dww.cz www.cso-effectiveness.org
Jana Miléřová (FoRS documentation)
jana.milerova@fors.cz www.fors.cz
Editor's Notes
How to make assessment more objective ? How to build capacities of CSOs beside workshops ? How to enhance sharing expertise of the platform members ? How to involve small, volunteer -based organisations, with highly limited resources? How to promote the guidelines beyond the platform? … And how to do it with minimum costs ? Workshops have been organized by FoRS as per the needs identified. However, only a limited number of CSO representatives could participate due to limited capacities and time constraints. Moreover, it has been realized that workshops and guidelines (such as the Code) are not sufficient to progress on the quality issues. It was identified that innovative solutions were needed to ignite a wider debate on development effectiveness and to foster capacity building among diverse actors, including less formal, often volunteer-based CSOs, individual experts, students as well as companies and state actors. Therefore two new concepts have been launched: (A) DevelopmentCoffee.org and (B) Peer Reviews.
Development Coffee is an informal platform of individuals and organisations interested in development issues. It is a free tool for sharing experiences and discussing common challenges, thus avoiding the same mistakes and learning from successes in order to enhance positive impacts of joint work on people living in poverty and injustice around the world.
Online “crowdsourcing” platform at www.DevelopmentCoffee.org was launched in October 2011. It is used to democratically generate new themes for discussion and to vote for the theme of the next session . Thus anybody from students, to volunteers, to professionals, to journalists, to government officers, to company representatives and general public can propose own theme online and vote for others. FoRS Secretariat ensures that themes relevant to FoRS Code on Effectiveness are proposed and that other themes are linked to relevant principles whenever possible. Beside the website, facebook, e-mail newsletter and on-line FoRS Forum are also used to promote new themes and sessions. Process : Every month, the steering group of FoRS members announces a winning theme and a session date. Further, it appoints speakers and selects a hosting organisation, which is closely related to the selected theme. The Development Coffees are held in the evenings to enable participation of students, volunteers, teachers and others who are usually unavailable for daily workshops. After a 15-minute introduction by speakers who propose their views on the theme and explain relevant links to the Code, an informal, moderated discussion follows among diverse actors. Usually, around 20 participants engage in the debate, which is officially 2 hours long, but transforms to an informal networking event thereafter. Moreover, the news from the Development Coffee currently reach out to more than 400 persons via the above mentioned communication channels.
So far, the Development Coffees covered diverse subjects such as: How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty reduction around the world? What are the stereotypes in development cooperation? How to ensure positive impacts of projects? or What are the new trends in development cooperation? (with a special focus on social media). Speakers included directors and programme managers of leading Czech development CSOs, of the Business Platform for Foreign Development Cooperation, the Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or the Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong. The evaluation after 9 months of implementation has shown that it is the informal debate that enriches participants ´ views and helps openly share concrete examples of good as well as bad practice. Thus it was proposed to keep the model and encourage new themes generation. Further, it was proposed to generate outputs from each session for wider dissemination and map the outcomes of the debates after a certain time period.
So far, the Development Coffees covered diverse subjects such as: How can NGOs and companies work together on poverty reduction around the world? What are the stereotypes in development cooperation? How to ensure positive impacts of projects? or What are the new trends in development cooperation? (with a special focus on social media). Speakers included directors and programme managers of leading Czech development CSOs, of the Business Platform for Foreign Development Cooperation, the Vodafone Foundation Czech Republic or the Globalisation Monitor from Hongkong. The evaluation after 9 months of implementation has shown that it is the informal debate that enriches participants ´ views and helps openly share concrete examples of good as well as bad practice. Thus it was proposed to keep the model and encourage new themes generation. Further, it was proposed to generate outputs from each session for wider dissemination and map the outcomes of the debates after a certain time period.
Besides annual self-evaluations as the main voluntary principle agreed in the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, the Peer Reviews are strongly recommended in order to increase objectivity of the assessment, to provide valuable external feedback to reviewed organisations and to support mutual learning and capacity building. The Peer Reviews have been inspired by the Global Education Network Europe (GENE) approach and especially by the experience of RORG-network , which introduced Peer Reviews in 2008 as one of the quality-building measures of the development education sector in Norway. The main purpose of RORG-network was to develop a certain degree of common understanding of development education. The lessons learnt, especially the engagement of several experts and focus on the uniqueness and added value of each organisation, in line with the appreciative inquiry approach , have served as a basis for developing a Czech system of development CSO Peer Reviews (FoRS, September 2011). FoRS Peer Reviews allow a structured, in-depth debate on each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness and mutual learning among self-selected peer CSOs. The process is facilitated through FoRS on-line Code of Effectiveness questionnaire, where FoRS members indicate their interest in the Peer Review. The member CSOs can also directly approach concrete peers based on the area they would like to get feedback on, ranging from awareness raising activities, to development interventions in the field, to general management. The sector overview of FoRS Secretariat is often helpful to identify such peers from among the member organisations. Drawing from the Norwegian experience, pilot Peer Reviews were launched by FoRS in cooperation with its member organisation SIRIRI in 2012, whereby five organisations were involved in this pilot phase. During the process, evidence is shared to jointly assess each indicator and draw recommendations for any changes if applicable. Moreover, SIRIRI has used the exercise not only to review each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, but also to get feedback on its overall strategy and ways forward. Other members tested mutual Peer Reviews bilaterally.
Besides annual self-evaluations as the main voluntary principle agreed in the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, the Peer Reviews are strongly recommended in order to increase objectivity of the assessment, to provide valuable external feedback to reviewed organisations and to support mutual learning and capacity building. The Peer Reviews have been inspired by the Global Education Network Europe (GENE) approach and especially by the experience of RORG-network , which introduced Peer Reviews in 2008 as one of the quality-building measures of the development education sector in Norway. The main purpose of RORG-network was to develop a certain degree of common understanding of development education. The lessons learnt, especially the engagement of several experts and focus on the uniqueness and added value of each organisation, in line with the appreciative inquiry approach , have served as a basis for developing a Czech system of development CSO Peer Reviews (FoRS, September 2011). FoRS Peer Reviews allow a structured, in-depth debate on each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness and mutual learning among self-selected peer CSOs. The process is facilitated through FoRS on-line Code of Effectiveness questionnaire, where FoRS members indicate their interest in the Peer Review. The member CSOs can also directly approach concrete peers based on the area they would like to get feedback on, ranging from awareness raising activities, to development interventions in the field, to general management. The sector overview of FoRS Secretariat is often helpful to identify such peers from among the member organisations. Drawing from the Norwegian experience, pilot Peer Reviews were launched by FoRS in cooperation with its member organisation SIRIRI in 2012, whereby five organisations were involved in this pilot phase. During the process, evidence is shared to jointly assess each indicator and draw recommendations for any changes if applicable. Moreover, SIRIRI has used the exercise not only to review each principle of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness, but also to get feedback on its overall strategy and ways forward. Other members tested mutual Peer Reviews bilaterally.
The pilot Peer Reviews are yet to be evaluated. However, it is already clear that they require strong dedication and sufficient time to discuss the evidence of principles in practice and successfully reach conclusions. Ownership of the process has to be secured throughout the organisation in order to put recommendations effectively in practice.
The launch of the FoRS Code on Effectiveness has shown that organisations are interested in evaluating their work, provided they own the process, have sufficient time to reflect and are positively encouraged on the way by the FoRS Secretariat and finally the FoRS General Assembly. Specific indicators , such as “FoRS Members and observers refuse displaying and describing extreme suffering for the purpose of obtaining financial recourses for their activities” (FoRS, June 2011), provide a useful basis for debate within the organisations. The indicators set minimal standards acceptable to all organizations. Moreover, it was appreciated that so called key indicators were specified, whereby their serious infringement can lead to the exclusion of the concerned organization from the FoRS platform. However, in order to use the Code mainly as a capacity building rather than repression tool, new concepts beside standard workshops and guidelines have been recently launched by FoRS – the Development Coffee and the Peer Reviews. Taking into account limited resources for capacity building among civil society organisation, both concepts have created new opportunities for promoting, evaluating and sharing experiences on effectiveness principles . Their advantages lie in quick, easy set-up with minimal costs and in capacity building fully driven by target groups . Both use social media for promotion, idea generation and engagement (Development Coffee has been developed based on the free web software www.wordpress.org, the Peer Reviews are facilitated through on-line FoRS Code on Effectiveness Questionnaire, consolidated via free service of www.googledocs.com). Willingness of engaged individuals and organisations to devote certain time to experience sharing and learning is essential to keep both concepts alive. To steer the process, the group of around 5 individuals engaged in FoRS Working Group on CSO Development Effectiveness has proven to be very useful. However, it is crucial that it is the participants, who decide the focus, the timing, the process and the outcomes. FoRS is open to further learn through this process and share the concepts to be utilised by evaluation practitioners, their networks and by any professional platform / network interested in free experience sharing and mutual learning. It is open to any feedback in order to further develop the tools for the benefits of the members, their partners and most of all their beneficiaries.