-
Analysis Facilities White Paper
Authors:
D. Ciangottini,
A. Forti,
L. Heinrich,
N. Skidmore,
C. Alpigiani,
M. Aly,
D. Benjamin,
B. Bockelman,
L. Bryant,
J. Catmore,
M. D'Alfonso,
A. Delgado Peris,
C. Doglioni,
G. Duckeck,
P. Elmer,
J. Eschle,
M. Feickert,
J. Frost,
R. Gardner,
V. Garonne,
M. Giffels,
J. Gooding,
E. Gramstad,
L. Gray,
B. Hegner
, et al. (41 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HS…
▽ More
This white paper presents the current status of the R&D for Analysis Facilities (AFs) and attempts to summarize the views on the future direction of these facilities. These views have been collected through the High Energy Physics (HEP) Software Foundation's (HSF) Analysis Facilities forum, established in March 2022, the Analysis Ecosystems II workshop, that took place in May 2022, and the WLCG/HSF pre-CHEP workshop, that took place in May 2023. The paper attempts to cover all the aspects of an analysis facility.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2024; v1 submitted 2 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities
Authors:
N. Brambilla,
S. Eidelman,
B. K. Heltsley,
R. Vogt,
G. T. Bodwin,
E. Eichten,
A. D. Frawley,
A. B. Meyer,
R. E. Mitchell,
V. Papadimitriou,
P. Petreczky,
A. A. Petrov,
P. Robbe,
A. Vairo,
A. Andronic,
R. Arnaldi,
P. Artoisenet,
G. Bali,
A. Bertolin,
D. Bettoni,
J. Brodzicka,
G. E. Bruno,
A. Caldwell,
J. Catmore,
C. -H. Chang
, et al. (42 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A golden age for heavy quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and prov…
▽ More
A golden age for heavy quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the $B$-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved mysteries for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for continuing investigations. The plethora of newly-found quarkonium-like states unleashed a flood of theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as quark-gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and in-medium behavior of c\bar{c}, b\bar{b}, and b\bar{c} bound states have been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold-nuclear-matter effects in quark-gluon plasma studies. This review systematically addresses all these matters and concludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future efforts.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2011; v1 submitted 27 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
-
Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics
Authors:
The ATLAS Collaboration,
G. Aad,
E. Abat,
B. Abbott,
J. Abdallah,
A. A. Abdelalim,
A. Abdesselam,
O. Abdinov,
B. Abi,
M. Abolins,
H. Abramowicz,
B. S. Acharya,
D. L. Adams,
T. N. Addy,
C. Adorisio,
P. Adragna,
T. Adye,
J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,
M. Aharrouche,
S. P. Ahlen,
F. Ahles,
A. Ahmad,
H. Ahmed,
G. Aielli,
T. Akdogan
, et al. (2587 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on…
▽ More
A detailed study is presented of the expected performance of the ATLAS detector. The reconstruction of tracks, leptons, photons, missing energy and jets is investigated, together with the performance of b-tagging and the trigger. The physics potential for a variety of interesting physics processes, within the Standard Model and beyond, is examined. The study comprises a series of notes based on simulations of the detector and physics processes, with particular emphasis given to the data expected from the first years of operation of the LHC at CERN.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2009; v1 submitted 28 December, 2008;
originally announced January 2009.
