research-article

Mouse, Tactile, and Tangible Input for 3D Manipulation

Authors:

Lonni Besançon,

Tobias IsenbergAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 4727 - 4740

https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025863

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We evaluate the performance and usability of mouse-based, touch-based, and tangible interaction for manipulating objects in a 3D virtual environment. This comparison is a step toward a better understanding of the limitations and benefits of these existing interaction techniques, with the ultimate goal of facilitating an easy transition between the different 3D data exploration environments. For this purpose we analyze participants' performance in 3D manipulation using a docking task. We measured completion times, docking accuracy, as well as subjective criteria such as fatigue, workload, and preference. Our results show that the three input modalities provide similar levels of precision but require different completion times. We also discuss our qualitative observations as well as people's preferences and put our findings into context of the application domain of 3D data analysis environments.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn3094p.mp4)

Supplemental video

Download
1.11 MB

References

[1]

Par-Anders Albinsson and Shumin Zhai. 2003. High precision touch screen interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 105--112.

Digital Library

[2]

Alissa N. Antle, Milena Droumeva, and Daniel Ha. 2009. Hands on what? Comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, New York, 80--88.

Digital Library

[3]

Ragnar Bade, Felix Ritter, and Bernhard Preim. 2005. Usability comparison of mouse-based interaction techniques for predictable 3D rotation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Smart Graphics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 138--150.

Digital Library

[4]

Thom Baguley. 2009. Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology 100, 3 (Aug. 2009), 603--617.

[5]

Monya Baker. 2015. Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Nature 531, 7593 (March 2015), 151.

[6]

Gavin Bell. 1988. Bell's trackball. Source code, formerly at http://www.dispersoid.net/code/trackball.c, available through the Internet Archive's copy of July 17, 2007. (1988). http://web.archive.org/web/20070717090837/http://www.dispersoid.net/code/trackball.c

[7]

Lonni Besanc¸on, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Hybrid tactile/tangible interaction for 3D data exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 881--890.

Digital Library

[8]

William Buxton. 1986. Chunking and phrasing and the design of human-computer Dialogues. In Proceedings of the IFIP World Computer Congress. 475--480. http://www. dgp.toronto.edu/OTP/papers/bill.buxton/chunking.html

[9]

Gery Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, and Daniel Vogel. 2012. 1 -- filter: A simple speed-based low-pass filter for noisy input in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2527--2530.

Digital Library

[10]

Li-Wei Chan, Hui-Shan Kao, Mike Y Chen, Ming-Sui Lee, Jane Hsu, and Yi-Ping Hung. 2010. Touching the void: Direct-touch interaction for intangible displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2625--2634.

Digital Library

[11]

Michael Chen, S. Joy Mountford, and Abigail Sellen. 1988. A study in interactive 3-D rotation using 2-D control devices. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 22, 4 (Aug. 1988), 121--129.

Digital Library

[12]

Robert Coe. 2002. It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm

[13]

Dane Coffey, Nicholas Malbraaten, Trung Le, Iman Borazjani, Fotis Sotiropoulos, Arthur G. Erdman, and Daniel F. Keefe. 2012. Interactive slice WIM: Navigating and interrogating volume datasets using a multi-surface, multi-touch VR interface. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 10 (Oct. 2012), 1614--1626.

Digital Library

[14]

Geoff Cumming. 2014. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science 25, 1 (Jan. 2014), 7--29.

[15]

Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. "Yours is better!" Participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1321--1330.

Digital Library

[16]

Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Fair statistical communication in HCI. In Modern Statistical Methods for HCI, Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, Chapter 13, 291--330.

[17]

Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny Chevalier, and Stephane Huot. 2014. Running an HCI experiment in multiple parallel universes. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 607--618.

Digital Library

[18]

Yuan Du, Haoyi Ren, Gang Pan, and Shjian Li. 2011. Tilt & touch: Mobile phone for 3D interaction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, 485--486.

Digital Library

[19]

Augusto Esteves and Ian Oakley. 2011. Informing design by recording tangible interaction. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2077--2082.

Digital Library

[20]

Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Chia Shen, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 647--656.

Digital Library

[21]

Bernd Froehlich, Jan Hochstrate, Verena Skuk, and Anke Huckauf. 2006. The GlobeFish and the GlobeMouse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 191--199.

Digital Library

[22]

David Glesser, Franc¸ois Bérard, and Jeremy R. Cooperstock. 2013. Overcoming limitations of the trackpad for 3D docking operations. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1239--1244.

Digital Library

[23]

Morris Goodman and Arthur Teicher. 1988. To touch or not to touch. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 25, 4 (1988), 44--64.

[24]

Mark Hancock, Sheelagh Carpendale, and Andy Cockburn. 2007. Shallow-depth 3D interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1147--1156.

Digital Library

[25]

Mark Hancock, Thomas ten Cate, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2009. Sticky tools: Full 6DOF force-based interaction for multi-touch tables. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, New York, 133--140.

Digital Library

[26]

Sandra G. Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (Oct. 2006), 904--908.

[27]

Ken Hinckley, Randy Pausch, John C Goble, and Neal F Kassell. 1994. Passive real-world interface props for neurosurgical visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 452--458.

Digital Library

[28]

Ken Hinckley, Joe Tullio, Randy Pausch, Dennis Proffitt, and Neal Kassell. 1997. Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 1--10.

Digital Library

[29]

Michael S Horn, R Jordan Crouser, and Marina U Bers. 2012. Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 16, 4 (2012), 379--389.

Digital Library

[30]

Tobias Isenberg. 2016. Interactive exploration of 3D scientific visualizations on large display surfaces. In Collaboration Meets Interactive Surfaces and Spaces: Theory and Practice, Craig Anslow, Pedro Campos, and Joaquim Jorge (Eds.). Springer, Berlin. To appear.

[31]

Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. The tangible user interface and its evolution. Communications of the ACM 51, 6 (June 2008), 32--36.

Digital Library

[32]

Bret Jackson, Tung Yuen Lau, David Schroeder, Kimani C. Toussaint Jr., and Daniel F. Keefe. 2013. A lightweight tangible 3D interface for interactive visualization of thin fiber structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2802--2809.

Digital Library

[33]

Robert JK Jacob, Linda E Sibert, Daniel C McFarlane, and M Preston Mullen Jr. 1994. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1, 1 (1994), 3--26.

Digital Library

[34]

Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2012. Tangible remote controllers for wall-size displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2865--2874.

Digital Library

[35]

Martin Kaltenbrunner, Till Bovermann, Ross Bencina, and Enrico Costanza. 2005. TUIO: A protocol for table-top tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation. Vannes, France. http://opensoundcontrol.org/tuio-protocol-table-top-tangible-user-interfaces

[36]

Nicholas Katzakis, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2013. Plane-casting: 3D cursor control with a smartphone. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction. ACM, New York, 199--200.

Digital Library

[37]

Daniel F. Keefe. 2010. Integrating visualization and interaction research to improve scientific workflows. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 30, 2 (March/April 2010), 8--13.

Digital Library

[38]

Daniel F. Keefe and Tobias Isenberg. 2013. Reimagining the scientific visualization interaction paradigm. IEEE Computer 46, 5 (May 2013), 51--57.

Digital Library

[39]

Kenrick Kin, Maneesh Agrawala, and Tony DeRose. 2009. Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. CIPS, Toronto, 119--124.

Digital Library

[40]

Tijmen Klein, Florimond Gueniat, Luc Pastur, Frederic Vernier, and Tobias Isenberg. 2012. A design study of direct-touch interaction for exploratory 3D scientific visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 31, 3 (June 2012), 1225--1234.

Digital Library

[41]

Sebastian Knoedel and Martin Hachet. 2011. Multi-touch RST in 2D and 3D spaces: Studying the impact of directness on user performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 75--78.

Digital Library

[42]

Vincent Levesque, Louise Oram, Karon MacLean, Andy Cockburn, Nicholas D. Marchuk, Dan Johnson, J. Edward Colgate, and Michael A. Peshkin. 2011. Enhancing physicality in touch interaction with programmable friction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2481--2490.

Digital Library

[43]

Hai-Ning Liang, Cary Williams, Myron Semegen, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Pourang Irani. 2013. An investigation of suitable interactions for 3D manipulation of distant objects through a mobile device. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control 9, 12 (2013), 4737--4752. http://www.ijicic.org/apchi12--291.pdf

[44]

Aurelien Lucchi, Patrick Jermann, Guillaume Zufferey, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2010. An empirical evaluation of touch and tangible interfaces for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York, 177--184.

Digital Library

[45]

Paul Marshall, Rowanne Fleck, Amanda Harris, Jochen Rick, Eva Hornecker, Yvonne Rogers, Nicola Yuill, and Nick Sheep Dalton. 2009. Fighting for control: Children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2149--2152.

Digital Library

[46]

Anthony Martinet, Gery Casiez, and Laurent Grisoni. 2010. The effect of DOF separation in 3D manipulation tasks with multi-touch displays. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 111--118.

Digital Library

[47]

Shawna Meyer, Oryx Cohen, and Erik Nilsen. 1994. Device comparisons for goal-directed drawing tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 251--252.

Digital Library

[48]

Tamara Munzner, Chris Johnson, Robert Moorhead, Hanspeter Pfister, Penny Rheingans, and Terry S. Yoo. 2006. NIH-NSF visualization research challenges report summary. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26, 2 (March 2006), 20--24.

Digital Library

[49]

Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

Digital Library

[50]

Izabel C. Olson, Zeina Atrash Leong, Uri Wilensky, and Mike S. Horn. 2011. "It's just a toolbar!" Using tangibles to help children manage conflict around a multi-touch tabletop. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York, 29--36.

Digital Library

[51]

Ivan Poupyrev and Shigeaki Maruyama. 2003. Tactile interfaces for small touch screens. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New York, 217--220.

Digital Library

[52]

Sara Price, Yvonne Rogers, Mike Scaife, Danae Stanton, and Helen Neale. 2003. Using "tangibles" to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interacting with Computers 15, 2 (April 2003), 169--185.

[53]

Mathieu Raynal, Guillaume Gauffre, Cedric Bach, Benedicte Schmitt, and Emmanuel Dubois. 2010. Tactile camera vs. tangible camera: Taking advantage of small physical artefacts to navigate into large data collection. In Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York, 373--382.

Digital Library

[54]

Farzan Sasangohar, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Stacey Scott. 2009. Evaluation of mouse and touch input for a tabletop display using Fitts' reciprocal tapping task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 53, 12 (Oct. 2009), 839--843.

[55]

Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis. 2010. Average task times in usability tests: What to report?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2347--2350.

Digital Library

[56]

Dominik Schmidt, Florian Block, and Hans Gellersen. 2009. A comparison of direct and indirect multi-touch input for large surfaces. In Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 582--594.

Digital Library

[57]

Andrew Sears and Ben Shneiderman. 1991. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 4 (1991), 593--613.

Digital Library

[58]

Abigail J. Sellen, Gordon P. Kurtenbach, and William A. S. Buxton. 1992. The prevention of mode errors through sensory feedback. Human Computer Interaction 7, 2 (June 1992), 141--164.

Digital Library

[59]

Orit Shaer and Eva Hornecker. 2010. Tangible user interfaces: Past, present, and future directions. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 3, 1--2 (2010), 1--137.

Digital Library

[60]

Christopher D. Shaw. 1998. Pain and fatigue in desktop VR: Initial results. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. CIPS, Toronto, 185--192.

[61]

Ben Shneiderman. 1991. Touch screens now offer compelling uses. IEEE Software 8, 2 (March 1991), 93--94.

Digital Library

[62]

Ken Shoemake. 1992. ARCBALL: A user interface for specifying three-dimensional orientation using a mouse. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. CIPS, Toronto, 151--156.

Digital Library

[63]

Adalberto L. Simeone and Hans Gellerseny. 2015. Comparing indirect and direct touch in a stereoscopic interaction task. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 105--108.

[64]

Peng Song, Wooi Boon Goh, Chi-Wing Fu, Qiang Meng, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2011. WYSIWYF: Exploring and annotating volume data with a tangible handheld device. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1333--1342.

Digital Library

[65]

Nicole Sultanum, Sowmya Somanath, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2011. "Point it, split it, peel it, view it": Techniques for interactive reservoir visualization on tabletops. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, New York, 192--201.

Digital Library

[66]

Lucia Terrenghi, David Kirk, Abigail Sellen, and Shahram Izadi. 2007. Affordances for manipulation of physical versus digital media on interactive surfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1157--1166.

Digital Library

[67]

Philip Tuddenham, David Kirk, and Shahram Izadi. 2010. Graspables revisited: Multi-touch vs. tangible input for tabletop displays in acquisition and manipulation tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 2223--2232.

Digital Library

[68]

Brygg Ullmer and Hiroshi Ishii. 2000. Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal 39, 3.4 (2000), 915--931.

Digital Library

[69]

Dimitar Valkov, Frank Steinicke, Gerd Bruder, and Klaus Hinrichs. 2011. 2D touching of 3D stereoscopic objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 1353--1362.

Digital Library

[70]

Gary R. VandenBos (Ed.). 2009. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. http://www.apastyle.org/manual/

[71]

Vanessa Vuibert, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Jeremy R Cooperstock. 2015. Evaluation of docking task performance using mid-air interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, New York, 44--52.

Digital Library

[72]

Sijie Wang. 2010. Comparing tangible and multi-touch interfaces for a spatial problem solving task. Master's thesis. Simon Fraser University, Canada. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/11500

[73]

Diane Watson, Mark Hancock, Regan L. Mandryk, and Max Birk. 2013. Deconstructing the touch experience. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. ACM, New York, 199--208.

Digital Library

[74]

Daniel Wigdor and Dennis Wixon. 2011. Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco.

Digital Library

[75]

Lesley Xie, Alissa N. Antle, and Nima Motamedi. 2008. Are tangibles more fun? Comparing children's enjoyment and engagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, New York, 191--198.

Digital Library

[76]

Lingyun Yu, Pjotr Svetachov, Petra Isenberg, Maarten H. Everts, and Tobias Isenberg. 2010. FI3D: Direct-touch interaction for the exploration of 3D scientific visualization spaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (Nov./Dec. 2010), 1613--1622.

Digital Library

[77]

Shumin Zhai and Paul Milgram. 1998. Quantifying coordination in multiple DOF movement and its application to evaluating 6 DOF input devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, 320--327.

Digital Library

Cited By

Mo WDechant MMarquardt NAyobi ASingh AHolloway C(2024)Exploring the Design Space of Input Modalities for Working in Mixed Reality on Long-haul FlightsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661560(2267-2285)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661560
Kim SKim YLee G(2024)Pressure-Based Menu Selection on a Spherical Tangible DeviceExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651090(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651090
Shibata RTanaka HIto KIzumi STakashima KItoh Y(2024)ArgusEyes: Interactions by Combining Multiple Modules with Optical Flow SensorsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648663(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3648663
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Mouse, Tactile, and Tangible Input for 3D Manipulation
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design

In this paper we present the tangible 3D tabletop and discuss the design potential of this novel interface. The tangible 3D tabletop combines tangible tabletop interaction with 3D projection in such a way that the tangible objects may be augmented with ...
Tangible navigation and object manipulation in virtual environments
TEI '11: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction

In this paper, we introduce approaches to navigating and manipulating objects in a Collaborative Virtual Environment (CVE) that engage tangible objects and an interactive table interface. We also identify three design concerns that are common to ...
Novel interaction techniques using touch-sensitive tangibles in tabletop environments
ITS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces

In this work, we propose techniques for interaction that use a touch-sensitive tangible to assist 3D manipulation in tabletop applications. The objective of this research is to investigate the effectiveness and user satisfaction with this combination ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2017

7138 pages

ISBN:9781450346559

DOI:10.1145/3025453

General Chairs:
Gloria Mark
University of California Irvine
,
Susan Fussell
Cornell University
,
Program Chairs:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
m.c. schraefel
University of Southampton
,
Juan Pablo Hourcade
University of Iowa
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Sud
,
Daniel Wigdor
University of Toronto

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 May 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '17

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '17: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 6 - 11, 2017

Colorado, Denver, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

74
Total Citations
View Citations
1,322
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)174
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)34

Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Mo WDechant MMarquardt NAyobi ASingh AHolloway C(2024)Exploring the Design Space of Input Modalities for Working in Mixed Reality on Long-haul FlightsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661560(2267-2285)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661560
Kim SKim YLee G(2024)Pressure-Based Menu Selection on a Spherical Tangible DeviceExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651090(1-6)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651090
Shibata RTanaka HIto KIzumi STakashima KItoh Y(2024)ArgusEyes: Interactions by Combining Multiple Modules with Optical Flow SensorsExtended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648663(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3648663
Merz CGöttfert CWienrich CLatoschik M(2024)Universal Access for Social XR Across Devices: The Impact of Immersion on the Experience in Asymmetric Virtual Collaboration2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00105(859-869)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00105
Kim SLee G(2024)Evaluating an In-Hand Ball-Shaped Controller for Object Manipulation in Virtual Reality2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00025(10-19)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00025
Bae SFujiwara TYnnerman ADo ERivera MSzafir D(2024)A Computational Design Pipeline to Fabricate Sensing Network PhysicalizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332719830:1(913-923)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327198
Fernandes JBrandão TAlmeida SSantana P(2023)An Educational Game to Teach Children about Air Quality Using Augmented Reality and Tangible Interaction with SensorsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph2005381420:5(3814)Online publication date: 21-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053814
Huang HPfister HYang Y(2023)Is embodied interaction beneficial? A study on navigating network visualizationsInformation Visualization10.1177/1473871623115708222:3(169-185)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/14738716231157082
Yu QYu K(2023)Does Motion-Sensing Technology Enhance Students’ Learning? A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Educational Computing Research10.1177/0735633123117674161:7(1359-1388)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231176741
Duan YYu JFeng JHe KLu JZhou J(2023)3D Finger Rotation Estimation from Fingerprint ImagesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36264677:ISS(114-134)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626467
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents