Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025890acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pressure-Based Gain Factor Control for Mobile 3D Interaction using Locally-Coupled Devices

Published: 02 May 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    We present the design and evaluation of pressure-based interactive control of 3D navigation precision. Specifically, we examine the control of gain factors in tangible 3D interactions using locally-coupled mobile devices. By focusing on pressure as a separate input channel we can adjust gain factors independently from other input modalities used in 3D navigation, in particular for the exploration of 3D visualisations. We present two experiments. First, we determined that people strongly preferred higher pressures to be mapped to higher gain factors. Using this mapping, we compared pressure with rate control, velocity control, and slider-based control in a second study. Our results show that pressure-based gain control allows people to be more precise in the same amount of time compared to established input modalities. Pressure-based control was also clearly preferred by our participants. In summary, we demonstrate that pressure facilitates effective and efficient precision control for mobile 3D navigation.

    Supplementary Material

    suppl.mov (pn3327.mp4)
    Supplemental video
    suppl.mov (pn3327p.mp4)
    Supplemental video

    References

    [1]
    Ahmed Sabbir Arif, Ali Mazalek, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2014. The use of pseudo pressure in authenticating smartphone users. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. ICST, Brussels, 151--160.
    [2]
    Ahmed Sabbir Arif and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2013. Pseudo-pressure detection and its use in predictive text entry on touchscreens. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration. ACM, NY, 383--392.
    [3]
    Thom Baguley. 2009. Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology 100, 3 (Aug. 2009), 603--617.
    [4]
    Monya Baker. 2015. Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Nature 531, 7593 (March 2015), 151.
    [5]
    Patrick Baudisch and Gerry Chu. 2009. Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1923--1932.
    [6]
    Hrvoje Benko, Andrew D. Wilson, and Patrick Baudisch. 2006. Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1263--1272.
    [7]
    Lonni Besancon, Paul Issartel, Mehdi Ammi, and Tobias Isenberg. 2017. Hybrid tactile/tangible interaction for 3D data exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 881--890.
    [8]
    Renaud Blanch, Yves Guiard, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Semantic pointing: Improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 519--526.
    [9]
    Stephen A. Brewster and Michael Hughes. 2009. Pressure-based text entry for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY.
    [10]
    Neil Burgess, Hugo J. Spiers, and Eleni Paleologou. 2004. Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: Dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory. Cognition 94, 2 (Dec. 2004), 149--166.
    [11]
    Bill Buxton. 2007. Multi-touch systems that I have known and loved. Website. (Jan. 2007). http://www.billbuxton.com/multitouchOverview.html Updated last on June 12, 2014, visited in March 2016.
    [12]
    William Buxton, Ralph Hill, and Peter Rowley. 1985. Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 19, 3 (July 1985), 215--224.
    [13]
    Gery Casiez, Daniel Vogel, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Andy Cockburn. 2008. The impact of control-display gain on user performance in pointing tasks. Human--Computer Interaction 23, 3 (2008), 215--250.
    [14]
    Jared Cechanowicz, Pourang Irani, and Sriram Subramanian. 2007. Augmenting the mouse with pressure sensitive input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1385--1394.
    [15]
    Robert Coe. 2002. It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm
    [16]
    Geoff Cumming. 2014. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science 25, 1 (Jan. 2014), 7--29.
    [17]
    Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. "Yours is better!" Participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1321--1330.
    [18]
    Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Fair statistical communication in HCI. In Modern Statistical Methods for HCI, Judy Robertson and Maurits Kaptein (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, Chapter 13, 291--330.
    [19]
    Pierre Dragicevic, Fanny Chevalier, and Stephane Huot. 2014. Running an HCI experiment in multiple parallel universes. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 607--618.
    [20]
    James D. Foley, Victor L. Wallace, and Peggy Chan. 1984. The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4, 11 (Nov. 1984), 13--48.
    [21]
    Clifton Forlines, Chia Shen, and Bill Buxton. 2005. Glimpse: A novel input model for multi-level devices. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1375--1378.
    [22]
    Scott Frees and G. Drew Kessler. 2005. Precise and rapid interaction through scaled manipulation in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality. IEEE, 99--106.
    [23]
    Sandra G. Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (Oct. 2006), 904--908.
    [24]
    Christopher F. Herot and Guy Weinzapfel. 1978. One-point touch input of vector information for computer displays. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 12, 3 (Aug. 1978), 210--216.
    [25]
    Ken Hinckley, Randy Pausch, John C. Goble, and Neal F. Kassell. 1994. A survey of design issues in spatial input. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, NY, 213--222.
    [26]
    Shigeo Hiraoka, Isshin Miyamoto, and Kiyoshi Tomimatsu. 2003. Behind touch, a text input method for mobile phones by the back and tactile sense interface. In Proceedings of Interaction. Information Processing Society of Japan, Tokyo, 131--138.
    [27]
    Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 234--241.
    [28]
    Paul Issartel, Lonni Besancón, Florimond Gueniat, Tobias Isenberg, and Mehdi Ammi. 2016a. Preference between allocentric and egocentric 3D manipulation in a locally coupled configuration. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, NY, 79--88.
    [29]
    Paul Issartel, Lonni Besancon, Tobias Isenberg, and Meryem Ammi. 2016b. A tangible volume for portable 3D interaction. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos.
    [30]
    Paul Issartel, Florimond Gueniat, Tobias Isenberg, and Mehdi Ammi. 2016c. Analysis of locally coupled 3D manipulation mappings based on mobile device motion. arXiv.org preprint 1603.07462. http://www.arxiv.org/abs/1603.07462
    [31]
    Jeroen Keijser, Sheelagh Carpendale, Mark Hancock, and Tobias Isenberg. 2007. Exploring 3D interaction in alternate control-display space mappings. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 17--24.
    [32]
    Roberta L. Klatzky. 1998. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In Spatial cognition, Christian Freksa, Christopher Habel, and Karl F. Wender (Eds.). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 210--216.
    [33]
    Martin Krzywinski and Naomi Altman. 2013. Points of significance: Error bars. Nature Methods 10, 10 (Oct. 2013), 921--922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2659
    [34]
    Kevin A. Li, Patrick Baudisch, and Ken Hinckley. 2008. Blindsight: Eyes-free access to mobile phones. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 1389--1398.
    [35]
    Hai-Ning Liang, Cary Williams, Myron Semegen, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Pourang Irani. 2013. An investigation of suitable interactions for 3D manipulation of distant objects through a mobile device. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control 9, 12 (Dec. 2013), 4737--4752. http://www.ijicic.org/apchi12--291.pdf
    [36]
    I. Scott MacKenzie and Stan Riddersma. 1994. Effects of output display and control-display gain on human performance in interactive systems. Behaviour & Information Technology 13, 5 (1994), 328--337.
    [37]
    Ross McLachlan, Daniel Boland, and Stephen Brewster. 2014. Transient and transitional states: pressure as an auxiliary input modality for bimanual interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 401--410.
    [38]
    Ross McLachlan and Stephen Brewster. 2015. Bimanual input for tablet devices with pressure and multi-touch gestures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, NY, 547--556.
    [39]
    Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
    [40]
    Ivan Poupyrev, Suzanne Weghorst, Mark Billinghurst,and Tadao Ichikawa. 1998. Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: Empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. Computer Graphics Forum 17, 3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467--8659.00252
    [41]
    Mahfuz Rahman, Sean Gustafson, Pourang Irani, and Sriram Subramanian. 2009. Tilt techniques: investigating the dexterity of wrist-based input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1943--1952.
    [42]
    Gonzalo Ramos and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2005. Zliding:Fluid zooming and sliding for high precision parameter manipulation. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.ACM, NY, 143--152.
    [43]
    Gonzalo Ramos, Matthew Boulos, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Pressure widgets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 487--494.
    [44]
    Xiangshi Ren, Jibin Yin, Shengdong Zhao, and Yang Li.2007. The adaptive hybrid cursor: A pressure-based target selection technique for pen-based user interfaces.In Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer,Berlin/Heidelberg, 310--323.
    [45]
    Carsten Schwesig, Ivan Poupyrev, and Eijiro Mori. 2004. Gummi: A bendable computer. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 263--270.
    [46]
    Christopher D. Shaw. 1998. Pain and fatigue in desktop VR: Initial results. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface.CIPS, Toronto, 185--192.
    [47]
    Erh-li Early Shen, Sung-sheng Daniel Tsai, Hao-hua Chu, Yung-jen Jane Hsu, and Chi-wen Euro Chen. 2009.Double-side multi-touch input for mobile devices. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 4339--4344.
    [48]
    Craig Stewart, Michael Rohs, Sven Kratz, and Georg Essl.2010. Characteristics of pressure-based input for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY,801--810.
    [49]
    Masanori Sugimoto and Keiichi Hiroki. 2006.Hybrid Touch: An intuitive manipulation technique for PDAs using their front and rear surfaces. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM,NY, 137--140.
    [50]
    Philip Tuddenham, David Kirk, and Shahram Izadi. 2010.Graspables revisited: Multi-touch vs. tangible input for tabletop displays in acquisition and manipulation tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY,2223--2232.
    [51]
    Gary R. VandenBos (Ed.). 2009. Publication Manual ofthe American Psychological Association (6th ed.).American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.http://www.apastyle.org/manual/
    [52]
    Daniel Wigdor, Clifton Forlines, Patrick Baudisch, John Barnwell, and Chia Shen. 2007. Lucid Touch: A see-through mobile device. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, NY, 269--278.
    [53]
    Daniel Wigdor, Darren Leigh, Clifton Forlines, Samuel Shipman, John Barnwell, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Chia Shen. 2006. Under the table interaction. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, NY, 259--268.
    [54]
    Graham Wilson, Craig Stewart, and Stephen A. Brewster. 2010. Pressure-based menu selection for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, NY, 181--190.
    [55]
    Graham Alasdair Wilson. 2013. Using pressure input and thermal feedback to broaden haptic interaction with mobile devices. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Glasgow, Scotland. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/4363
    [56]
    Aileen Worden, Nef Walker, Krishna Bharat, and Scott Hudson. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: Area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, NY, 266--271.
    [57]
    Shumin Zhai. 1998. User performance in relation to 3D input device design. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 32, 4 (Nov. 1998), 50--54.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Modular Tangible User Interfaces: Impact of Module Shape and Bonding Strength on InteractionProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572731(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Working with Forensic Practitioners to Understand the Opportunities and Challenges for Mixed-Reality Digital AutopsyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580768(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)An exploration of pressure input with bare finger for Mobile interaction in stationary and Mobile situationsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-14503-082:17(25711-25731)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Pressure-Based Gain Factor Control for Mobile 3D Interaction using Locally-Coupled Devices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 02 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Honorable Mention

      Author Tags

      1. 3D navigation
      2. TUI
      3. pressure input
      4. tangible interaction

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '17
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 600 of 2,400 submissions, 25%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)52
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Jul 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Modular Tangible User Interfaces: Impact of Module Shape and Bonding Strength on InteractionProceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3569009.3572731(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2023
      • (2023)Working with Forensic Practitioners to Understand the Opportunities and Challenges for Mixed-Reality Digital AutopsyProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580768(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2023)An exploration of pressure input with bare finger for Mobile interaction in stationary and Mobile situationsMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-023-14503-082:17(25711-25731)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2023
      • (2022)TetraForce: A Magnetic-Based Interface Enabling Pressure Force and Shear Force Input Applied to Front and Back of a SmartphoneProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35677176:ISS(185-206)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
      • (2022)GAN’SDA Wrap: Geographic And Network Structured DAta on surfaces that Wrap aroundProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501928(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Point specification in collaborative visualization for 3D scalar fields using augmented realityVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-021-00614-226:4(1317-1334)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2022
      • (2021)The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D VisualizationComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1418940:1(293-326)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2021
      • (2021)A Rate-based Drone Control with Adaptive Origin Update in Telexistence2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR50410.2021.00108(807-816)Online publication date: Mar-2021
      • (2020)Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR46266.2020.1581122519414(588-597)Online publication date: Mar-2020
      • (2020)Design and Evaluation of Interactive Small Multiples Data Visualisation in Immersive Spaces2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR46266.2020.00081(588-597)Online publication date: Mar-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media