Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Computation of Stackelberg Equilibria of Finite Sequential Games

Published: 14 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The Stackelberg equilibrium is a solution concept that describes optimal strategies to commit to: Player 1 (the leader) first commits to a strategy that is publicly announced, then Player 2 (the follower) plays a best response to the leader’s choice. We study the problem of computing Stackelberg equilibria in finite sequential (i.e., extensive-form) games and provide new exact algorithms, approximation algorithms, and hardness results for finding equilibria for several classes of such two-player games.

References

[1]
Rabah Amir and Isabel Grilo. 1999. Stackelberg versus Cournot equilibrium. Games and Economic Behavior 26, 1 (1999), 1--21.
[2]
Branislav Bošanský and Jiří Čermák. 2015. Sequence-form algorithm for computing Stackelberg equilibria in extensive-form games. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 805--811.
[3]
Jiří Čermák, Branislav Bošanský, Karel Durkota, Viliam Lisý, and Christopher Kiekintveld. 2016. Using correlated strategies for computing Stackelberg equilibria in extensive-form games. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 439--445.
[4]
Jakub Černý. 2016. Stackelberg Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium with Multiple Followers. Master’s thesis. Czech Technical University in Prague.
[5]
Xi Chen, Xiaotie Deng, and Shang-Hua Teng. 2009. Settling the complexity of computing two-player Nash equilibria. Journal of the ACM 56, Article 14 (May 2009), 57 pages. Issue 3.
[6]
Vincent Conitzer and Dmytro Korzhyk. 2011. Commitment to correlated strategies. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 632--637.
[7]
Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm. 2006. Computing the optimal strategy to commit to. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). ACM, 82--90.
[8]
Constantinos Daskalakis, Alex Fabrikant, and Christos H. Papadimitriou. 2006a. The game world is flat: The complexity of Nash equilibria in succinct games. In Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 513--524.
[9]
Constantinos Daskalakis, Paul W. Goldberg, and Christos H. Papadimitriou. 2006b. The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). ACM, 71--78.
[10]
Mark De Berg, Marc Van Kreveld, Mark Overmars, and Otfried Cheong Schwarzkopf. 2000. Computational Geometry (2nd ed.). Springer.
[11]
Federico Etro. 2007. Stackelberg Competition and Endogenous Entry. Springer Berlin, 91--129.
[12]
Peter Gritzmann and Bernd Sturmfels. 1993. Minkowski addition of polytopes: Computational complexity and applications to Grbner bases. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (SIDMA) 6, 2 (1993), 246--269.
[13]
Anshul Gupta. 2015. Equilibria in Finite Games. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Liverpool.
[14]
Anshul Gupta, Sven Schewe, and Dominik Wojtczak. 2015. Making the best of limited memory in multi-player discounted sum games. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (EPTCS), 16--30.
[15]
Jonathan H. Hamilton and Steven M. Slutsky. 1990. Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria. Games and Economic Behavior 2, 1 (1990), 29--46.
[16]
Joshua Letchford. 2013. Computational Aspects of Stackelberg Games. Ph.D. Dissertation. Duke University.
[17]
Joshua Letchford and Vincent Conitzer. 2010. Computing optimal strategies to commit to in extensive-form games. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC). ACM, 83--92.
[18]
Joshua Letchford, Liam MacDermed, Vincent Conitzer, Ronald Parr, and Charles L. Isbell. 2012. Computing optimal strategies to commit to in stochastic games. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 1380--1386.
[19]
Toshihiro Matsumura. 2003. Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bulletin of Economic Research 55 (2003), 275--287.
[20]
Thanh H. Nguyen, Francesco M. Delle Fave, Debarun Kar, Aravind S. Lakshminarayanan, Amulya Yadav, Milind Tambe, Noa Agmon, Andrew J. Plumptre, Margaret Driciru, Fred Wanyama, and Aggrey Rwetsiba. 2015. Making the Most of Our Regrets: Regret-Based Solutions to Handle Payoff Uncertainty and Elicitation in Green Security Games. Springer International Publishing, 170--191.
[21]
Praveen Paruchuri, Jonathan P. Pearce, Janusz Marecki, Milind Tambe, Fernando Ordonez, and Sarit Kraus. 2008. Playing games for security: An efficient exact algorithm for solving Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of International Conference on Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMAS), 895--902.
[22]
Hanif D. Sherali. 1984. A multiple leader Stackelberg model and analysis. Operations Research 32, 2 (1984), 390--404.
[23]
Milind Tambe. 2011. Security and Game Theory: Algorithms, Deployed Systems, Lessons Learned. Cambridge University Press.
[24]
Eric van Damme and Sjaak Hurkens. 1999. Endogenous Stackelberg leadership. Games and Economic Behavior 28, 1 (1999), 105-129.
[25]
Heinrich von Stackelberg. 1934. Marktform und gleichgewicht. Springer-Verlag.
[26]
Bernhard von Stengel and Francoise Forges. 2008. Extensive-form correlated equilibrium: Definition and computational complexity. Mathematics of Operations Research 33, 4 (2008), 1002--1022.
[27]
Bernhard von Stengel and Shmuel Zamir. 2010. Leadership games with convex strategy sets. Games and Economic Behavior 69, 2 (2010), 446--457.
[28]
Haifeng Xu, Zinovi Rabinovich, Shaddin Dughmi, and Milind Tambe. 2015. Exploring information asymmetry in two-stage security games. In Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI, 1057--1063.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Function approximation for solving stackelberg equilibrium in large perfect information gamesProceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25715(5764-5772)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Efficiently Solving Turn-Taking Stochastic Games with Extensive-Form CorrelationProceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3580507.3597665(1161-1186)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Planning Data Poisoning Attacks on Heterogeneous Recommender Systems in a Multiplayer Setting2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00193(2510-2523)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation  Volume 5, Issue 4
Special Issue on Wine'15
November 2017
146 pages
ISSN:2167-8375
EISSN:2167-8383
DOI:10.1145/3174276
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 December 2017
Accepted: 01 June 2017
Revised: 01 December 2016
Received: 01 July 2016
Published in TEAC Volume 5, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Algorithmic game theory
  2. Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium
  3. extensive-form games
  4. finite sequential games
  5. stackelberg equilibrium

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky
  • United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  • I-CORE Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and The Israel Science Foundation
  • Danish National Research Foundation and The National Science Foundation of China
  • Danish Strategic Research Council
  • Israel Science Foundation
  • European Research Council

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Function approximation for solving stackelberg equilibrium in large perfect information gamesProceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Fifth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Thirteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25715(5764-5772)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Efficiently Solving Turn-Taking Stochastic Games with Extensive-Form CorrelationProceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3580507.3597665(1161-1186)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Planning Data Poisoning Attacks on Heterogeneous Recommender Systems in a Multiplayer Setting2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00193(2510-2523)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Duel-based neuroevolutionary method for Stackelberg Security Games with boundedly rational AttackerApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110673146(110673)Online publication date: Oct-2023
  • (2021)Disruption-Limited Planning for Robot Navigation in Dynamic Environments2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636274(377-383)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2021
  • (2021)Game Theory on the Blockchain: A Model for Games with Smart ContractsAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-030-85947-3_11(156-170)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
  • (2020)An Energy Internet DERMS Platform using a Multi-level Stackelberg GameSustainable Cities and Society10.1016/j.scs.2020.102262(102262)Online publication date: May-2020
  • (2018)Trembling-hand perfection in extensive-form games with commitmentProceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3304415.3304449(233-239)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2018
  • (2018)Incremental Strategy Generation for Stackelberg Equilibria in Extensive-Form GamesProceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation10.1145/3219166.3219219(151-168)Online publication date: 11-Jun-2018

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media