Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

The Role of Conversational Grounding in Supporting Symbiosis Between People and Digital Assistants

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In "smart speaker'' digital assistant systems such as Google Home, there is no visual user interface, so people must learn about the system's capabilities and limitations by experimenting with different questions and commands. However, many new users give up quickly and limit their use to a few simple tasks. This is a problem for both the user and the system. Users who stop trying out new things cannot learn about new features and functionality, and the system receives less data upon which to base future improvements. Symbiosis---a mutually beneficial relationship---between AI systems like digital assistants and people is an important aspect of developing systems that are partners to humans and not just tools. In order to better understand requirements for symbiosis, we investigated the relationship between the types of digital assistant responses and users' subsequent questions, focusing on identifying interactions that were discouraging to users when speaking with a digital assistant. We conducted a user study with 20 participants who completed a series of information seeking tasks using the Google Home, and analyzed transcripts using a method based on applied conversation analysis. We found that the most common response from the Google Home, a version of "Sorry, I'm not sure how to help'', provided no feedback for participants to build on when forming their next question. However, responses that provided somewhat strange but tangentially related answers were actually more helpful for conversational grounding, which extended the interaction. We discuss the connection between grounding and symbiosis, and present recommendations for requirements for forming partnerships with digital assistants.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v4cscw033aux.pdf.zip)
1. Screening Questionnaire, 2. Participant Instructions, 3.Post-task Questions, 4. Information About Task Counterbalancing

References

[1]
Saleema Amershi, Saleema Weld, DaAmershi, Dan Weld, Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Adam Fourney, Besmira Nushi, Penny Collisson, Jina Suh, Shamsi Iqbal, Paul N. Bennett, Kori Inkpen, Jaime Teevan, Ruth Kikin-Gil, and Eric Horvitz. 2019. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
[2]
Tawfiq Ammari, Jofish Kaye, Janice Y. Tsai, and Frank Bentley. 2019. Music, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 26, 3 (Apr. 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3311956
[3]
Zahra Ashktorab, Mohit Jain, Q. Vera Liao, and Justin D. Weisz. 2019. Resilient Chatbots: Repair Strategy Preferences for Conversational Breakdowns. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300484
[4]
Erin Beneteau, Olivia K Richards, Mingrui Zhang, Julie A Kientz, Jason Yip, and Alexis Hiniker. 2019. Communication Breakdowns Between Families and Alexa. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300473
[5]
Frank Bentley, Chris Luvogt, Max Silverman, Rushani Wirasinghe, Brooke White, and Danielle Lottridge. 2018. Understanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 2, 3 (Sep. 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3264901
[6]
Dan Bohus and Alexander I. Rudnicky. 2005. Sorry, I didn't catch that! An investigation of non-understanding errors and recovery strategies. In 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. 128--143. https://www.isca-speech.org/archive_open/sigdial6/sgd6_128.html
[7]
S.E. Brennan. 1991. Conversation With and Through Computers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 1 (1991), 67--86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158952
[8]
Susan E Brennan. 1998. The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (1998), 201--225.
[9]
Yun-Nung Chen, Asli Celikyilmaz, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2017. Deep Learning for Dialogue Systems. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics-Tutorial Abstracts,. Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, 8--14. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P17--5004
[10]
Minji Cho, Sang-su Lee, and Kun-Pyo Lee. 2019. Once a Kind Friend is Now a Thing: Understanding How Conversational Agents at Home are Forgotten. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1557--1569. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322332
[11]
Herbert H. Clark. 1996. Using Language .Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539
[12]
Herbert H Clark and Susan E Brennan. 1991. Grounding in Communication. (1991), 127--149. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-006
[13]
Herbert H Clark and Edward F Schaefer. 1989. Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science, Vol. 13, 2 (1989), 259--294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(89)90008--6
[14]
Eric Enge. 2017. Rating the Smarts of the Digital Personal Assistants. https://blogs.perficientdigital.com/2017/04/27/1-rating-the-smarts-of-the-digital-personal-assistants/
[15]
Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, and Rein Ove Sikveland. 2019. Progressivity for Voice Interface Design. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342788
[16]
Susan R Fussell and Robert M Krauss. 1989. The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, 3 (1989), 203--219.
[17]
Radhika Garg and Christopher Moreno. 2019. Understanding Motivators, Constraints, and Practices of Sharing Internet of Things. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 3, 2, Article 44 (2019), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328915
[18]
Radhika Garg and Subhasree Sengupta. 2019. “When You Can Do It, Why Can't I?”: Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Family Technology Use and Non-Use. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 3, CSCW, Article 63 (2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359165
[19]
Nigel Gilbert, Robin Wooffitt, and Norman Fraser. 1990. Organising Computer Talk. In Computers and Conversation, Paul Luff, Nigel Gilbert, and David Frohlich (Eds.). Academic Press, Chapter 11, 235--257. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-050264--9.50016--6
[20]
Jonathan Grudin. 2017. From Tool to Partner: The Evolution of Human-Computer Interaction. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Interaction, Vol. 10, 1 (2017), i--183. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00745ED1V01Y201612HCI035
[21]
Jonathan Grudin and Richard Jacques. 2019. Chatbots, Humbots, and the Quest for Artificial General Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 209, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300439
[22]
Drew Harwell. 2018. Why some accents don't work on Alexa or Google Home. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/business/alexa-does-not-understand-your-accent/
[23]
Ryuichiro Higashinaka, Kotaro Funakoshi, Masahiro Araki, Hiroshi Tsukahara, Yuka Kobayashi, and Masahiro Mizukami. 2015. Towards Taxonomy of Errors in Chat-Oriented Dialogue Systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. Association for Computational Linguistics, 87--95. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15--4611
[24]
Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 159--166. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303030
[25]
Jiepu Jiang, Wei Jeng, and Daqing He. 2013. How Do Users Respond to Voice Input Errors? Lexical and Phonetic Query Reformulation in Voice Search. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143--152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2484028.2484092
[26]
Rafal Kocielnik, Saleema Amershi, and Paul N Bennett. 2019. Will You Accept an Imperfect AI? Exploring Designs for Adjusting End-user Expectations of AI Systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 411. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300641
[27]
Robert M Krauss and Susan R Fussell. 1991. Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social cognition, Vol. 9, 1 (1991), 2--24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.2
[28]
Lenneke Kuijer and Elisa Giaccardi. 2018. Co-performance: Conceptualizing the role of artificial agency in the design of everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 125, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173699
[29]
J. C. R. Licklider. 1960. Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, Vol. HFE-1, 1 (March 1960), 4--11. https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
[30]
Gustavo López, Luis Quesada, and Luis A. Guerrero. 2017. Alexa vs. Siri vs. Cortana vs. Google Assistant: A Comparison of Speech-Based Natural User Interfaces. In Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. AHFE 2017, Isabel L. Nunes (Ed.), Vol. 592. Springer, Cham, 241--250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--60366--7_23
[31]
Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. Like Having a Really Bad PA: the Gulf Between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 5286--5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288
[32]
Gary Marchionini. 1995. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments .Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626388
[33]
Matthew Marge and Alexander I Rudnicky. 2019. Miscommunication Detection and Recovery in Situated Human--Robot Dialogue. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst., Vol. 9, 1, Article 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3237189
[34]
Michael McTear. 2008. Handling Miscommunication: Why Bother? In Recent trends in Discourse and Dialogue, Dybkjær L. and Minker W. (Eds.). Text, Speech and Language Technology, Vol. 39. Springer, Dordrecht, 101--122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4020--6821--8_5
[35]
Michael McTear. 2018. Conversational Modelling for Chatbots: Current Approaches and Future Directions. In Studientexte zur Sprachkommunikation: Elektronische Sprachsignalverarbeitung 2018, André Berton, Udo Haiber, and Wolfgang Minker (Eds.). TUDpress, Dresden, 175--185.
[36]
Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. The conversational interface: Talking to smart devices .Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--32967--3
[37]
Raveesh Meena, José Lopes, Gabriel Skantze, and Joakim Gustafson. 2015. Automatic Detection of Miscommunication in Spoken Dialogue Systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 354--363. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W15--4647
[38]
Grégoire Mesnil, Yann Dauphin, Kaisheng Yao, Yoshua Bengio, Li Deng, Dilek Hakkani-Tur, Xiaodong He, Larry Heck, Gokhan Tur, Dong Yu, et al. 2014. Using recurrent neural networks for slot filling in spoken language understanding. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Vol. 23, 3 (2014), 530--539. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2014.2383614
[39]
Roger K Moore. 2017. Is Spoken Language All-or-Nothing? Implications for Future Speech-Based Human-Machine Interaction. In Dialogues with Social Robots, Jokinen K. and Wilcock G. (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 427. Springer, Singapore, 281--291. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--981--10--2585--3_22
[40]
M Granger Morgan, Baruch Fischhoff, Ann Bostrom, and Cynthia J Atman. 2002. Risk communication: A mental models approach .Cambridge University Press.
[41]
Chelsea Myers, Anushay Furqan, Jessica Nebolsky, Karina Caro, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Patterns for How Users Overcome Obstacles in Voice User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173580
[42]
Katashi Nagao. 2019. Symbiosis between Humans and Artificial Intelligence. In Artificial Intelligence Accelerates Human Learning. Springer, 135--151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--981--13--6175--3_6
[43]
Jakob Nielsen. 1993. Usability Engineering .Academic Press, Inc.
[44]
Sarah Perez. 2018. Google says it sold a Google Home device every second since October 19. https://techcrunch.com/2018/12/28/smart-speakers-hit-critical-mass-in-2018/
[45]
Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 640. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214
[46]
Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, and Sarah Sharples. 2017. Do animals have accents? Talking with Agents in Multi-Party Conversation. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 207--219. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998298
[47]
Antonio Roque and David Traum. 2008. Degrees of Grounding Based on Evidence of Understanding. In Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. 54--63. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W08-0107/
[48]
Johnny Salda na. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers .Sage.
[49]
Emanuel A Schegloff. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer. In Conversation Analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.
[50]
Alex Sciuto, Arnita Saini, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jason I Hong. 2018. Hey Alexa, What's Up? A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 857--868. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196772
[51]
Phoebe Sengers and Bill Gaver. 2006. Staying Open to Interpretation: Engaging Multiple Meanings in Design and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (DIS '06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 99--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422
[52]
Gabriel Skantze. 2005. Exploring Human Error Recovery Strategies: Implications for Spoken Dialogue Systems. Speech Communication, Vol. 45, 3 (2005), 325--341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2004.11.005
[53]
Chairs Constantine Stephanidis, Gavriel Salvendy, Members of the Group Margherita Antona, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Jianming Dong, Vincent G. Duffy, Xiaowen Fang, Cali Fidopiastis, Gino Fragomeni, Limin Paul Fu, Yinni Guo, Don Harris, Andri Ioannou, Kyeong ah (Kate) Jeong, Shin'ichi Konomi, Heidi Krömker, Masaaki Kurosu, James R. Lewis, Aaron Marcus, Gabriele Meiselwitz, Abbas Moallem, Hirohiko Mori, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Stavroula Ntoa, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Dylan Schmorrow, Keng Siau, Norbert Streitz, Wentao Wang, Sakae Yamamoto, Panayiotis Zaphiris, and Jia Zhou. 2019. Seven HCI Grand Challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 35, 14 (2019), 1229--1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259
[54]
Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions .Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418
[55]
Paul Ten Have. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis 2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208895
[56]
Jason Wu, Karan Ahuja, Richard Li, Victor Chen, and Jeffrey Bigham. 2019. ScratchThat: Supporting Command-Agnostic Speech Repair in Voice-Driven Assistants. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 3, 2, Article 63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328934

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Qualitative Approaches to Voice UXACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365866656:12(1-34)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Voice Assistants' Accountability through Explanatory DialoguesProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665557(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported DataProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373648:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The Role of Conversational Grounding in Supporting Symbiosis Between People and Digital Assistants

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW1
    CSCW
    May 2020
    1285 pages
    EISSN:2573-0142
    DOI:10.1145/3403424
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 29 May 2020
    Online AM: 07 May 2020
    Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. common ground
    2. conversational analysis
    3. conversational system
    4. digital assistant
    5. google home
    6. human-AI interaction
    7. qualitative analysis
    8. symbiosis
    9. voice interface

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)142
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Qualitative Approaches to Voice UXACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365866656:12(1-34)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Voice Assistants' Accountability through Explanatory DialoguesProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665557(1-12)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Leveraging Large Language Models to Power Chatbots for Collecting User Self-Reported DataProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373648:CSCW1(1-35)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Healthcare Voice AI Assistants: Factors Influencing Trust and Intention to UseProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373398:CSCW1(1-37)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Designing the Conversational Agent: Asking Follow-up Questions for Information ElicitationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373208:CSCW1(1-30)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Multidisciplinary Review of Artificial Empathy: From Theory to Technical Implementation and DesignCross-Cultural Design10.1007/978-3-031-60913-8_14(195-209)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Beyond Self-diagnosis: How a Chatbot-based Symptom Checker Should RespondACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/358995930:4(1-44)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Ignorance is Bliss? The Effect of Explanations on Perceptions of Voice AssistantsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35794977:CSCW1(1-24)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Can Voice Assistants Be Microaggressors? Cross-Race Psychological Responses to Failures of Automatic Speech RecognitionProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581357(1-14)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Exploring Robot Personality through Big Data Mining: A Century-Long Analysis from Google BooksInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.2266796(1-13)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media