research-article

Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading Activities

Authors:

Liang HeAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 8, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 496, Pages 1 - 25

https://doi.org/10.1145/3687035

Published: 08 November 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Interactive storytelling is vital for preschooler development. While children's interactive partners have traditionally been their parents and teachers, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have sparked a surge of AI-based storytelling and reading technologies. As these technologies become increasingly ubiquitous in preschoolers' lives, questions arise regarding how they function in practical storytelling and reading scenarios and, how parents, the most critical stakeholders, experience and perceive these technologies. This paper investigates these questions through a qualitative study with 17 parents of children aged 3-6. Our findings suggest that even though AI-based storytelling and reading technologies provide more immersive and engaging interaction, they still cannot meet parents' expectations due to a series of interactive and algorithmic challenges. We elaborate on these challenges and discuss the possible implications of future AI-based interactive storytelling technologies for preschoolers.

References

[1]

Erin Beneteau, Ashley Boone, Yuxing Wu, Julie A Kientz, Jason Yip, and Alexis Hiniker. 2020. Parenting with Alexa: exploring the introduction of smart speakers on family dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376344

Digital Library

[2]

Frank Bentley, Chris Luvogt, Max Silverman, Rushani Wirasinghe, Brooke White, and Danielle Lottridge. 2018. Understanding the long-term use of smart speaker assistants. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 2, 3 (2018), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264901

Digital Library

[3]

Laura Boffi. 2020. Ding-dong: the Storybell and its wizard. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference. 421--425. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394423

Digital Library

[4]

Bengisu Cagiltay, Nathan Thomas White, Rabia Ibtasar, Bilge Mutlu, and Joseph Michaelis. 2022. Understanding Factors that Shape Children's Long Term Engagement with an In-Home Learning Companion Robot. In Interaction Design and Children. 362--373.

[5]

Zhenyao Cai. 2023. EmotionBlock: A Tangible Toolkit for Social-emotional Learning Through Storytelling. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 693--696. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585088.3594485

Digital Library

[6]

Chien-Ju Chang and Cho-Chi Huang. 2016. Mother--child talk during joint book reading in two social classes in Taiwan: Interaction strategies and information types. Applied Psycholinguistics, Vol. 37, 2 (2016), 387--410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000041

[7]

Huili Chen, Anastasia K Ostrowski, Soo Jung Jang, Cynthia Breazeal, and Hae Won Park. 2022. Designing Long-term Parent-child-robot Triadic Interaction at Home through Lived Technology Experiences and Interviews. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 401--408.

Digital Library

[8]

Jiaju Chen, Yuxuan Lu, Shao Zhang, Bingsheng Yao, Yuanzhe Dong, Ying Xu, Yunyao Li, Qianwen Wang, Dakuo Wang, and Yuling Sun. 2023. FairytaleCQA: Integrating a Commonsense Knowledge Graph into Children's Storybook Narratives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09756 (2023).

[9]

Jennifer Chubb, Sondess Missaoui, Shauna Concannon, Liam Maloney, and James Alfred Walker. 2022. Interactive storytelling for children: A case-study of design and development considerations for ethical conversational AI. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Vol. 32 (2022), 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100403

Digital Library

[10]

Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, and Nikki Hayfield. 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, Vol. 3 (2015), 222--248.

[11]

Benjamin R Cowan, Nadia Pantidi, David Coyle, Kellie Morrissey, Peter Clarke, Sara Al-Shehri, David Earley, and Natasha Bandeira. 2017. “What can i help you with” infrequent users' experiences of intelligent personal assistants. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098539

Digital Library

[12]

Griffin Dietz, Jimmy K Le, Nadin Tamer, Jenny Han, Hyowon Gweon, Elizabeth L Murnane, and James A Landay. 2021. Storycoder: Teaching computational thinking concepts through storytelling in a voice-guided app for children. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445039

Digital Library

[13]

Jaimie Drozdal, Justin Weisz, Dakuo Wang, Gaurav Dass, Bingsheng Yao, Changruo Zhao, Michael Muller, Lin Ju, and Hui Su. 2020. Trust in AutoML: exploring information needs for establishing trust in automated machine learning systems. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. 297--307.

Digital Library

[14]

Stefania Druga, Randi Williams, Cynthia Breazeal, and Mitchel Resnick. 2017. “Hey Google is it ok if I eat you” Initial explorations in child-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 conference on interaction design and children. 595--600. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084330

Digital Library

[15]

Yao Du, Kerri Zhang, Sruthi Ramabadran, and Yusa Liu. 2021. Alexa, What is That Sound? A Video Analysis of Child-Agent Communication From Two Amazon Alexa Games. In Interaction Design and Children. 513--520. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3465195

Digital Library

[16]

Neil Frude and Steve Killick. 2011. Family storytelling and the attachment relationship. Psychodynamic Practice, Vol. 17, 4 (2011), 441--455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14753634.2011.609025

[17]

Radhika Garg, Hua Cui, Spencer Seligson, Bo Zhang, Martin Porcheron, Leigh Clark, Benjamin R Cowan, and Erin Beneteau. 2022. The last decade of HCI research on children and voice-based conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502016

Digital Library

[18]

Radhika Garg and Subhasree Sengupta. 2020. Conversational technologies for in-home learning: using co-design to understand children's and parents' perspectives. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376631

Digital Library

[19]

Mirko Gelsomini, Franca Garzotto, Daniele Montesano, and Daniele Occhiuto. 2016. Wildcard: A wearable virtual reality storytelling tool for children with intellectual developmental disability. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 5188--5191. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591896

[20]

Ariel Han and Zhenyao Cai. 2023. Design implications of generative AI systems for visual storytelling for young learners. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference. 470--474.

Digital Library

[21]

Ariel Han, Zhenyao Cai, Seungmin Jeong, and Sunm Choi. 2023. AIStory: design implication of using generative arts AI for visual storytelling. (2023).

[22]

Chad Harbig, Melissa Burton, Mariam Melkumyan, Lei Zhang, and Jiyoung Choi. 2011. SignBright: A Storytelling Application to Connect Deaf Children and Hearing Parents. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI EA '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 977--982. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979508

Digital Library

[23]

James J Heckman. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979), 153--161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352

[24]

John Helmes, Xiang Cao, Siân E Lindley, and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Developing the story: Designing an interactive storytelling application. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces. 49--52. https://doi.org/10.1145/1731903.1731913

Digital Library

[25]

Paulina Toro Isaza, Guangxuan Xu, Akintoye Oloko, Yufang Hou, Nanyun Peng, and Dakuo Wang. 2023. Are Fairy Tales Fair? Analyzing Gender Bias in Temporal Narrative Event Chains of Children's Fairy Tales. ACL'23 (2023).

[26]

Jacqueline Kory and Cynthia Breazeal. 2014. Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children's language development. In The 23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, 643--648.

[27]

Pillar Learning. 2021. Meet Codi - An Interactive, AI-Enabled Smart Toy for Kids! https://www.pillarlearning.com/

[28]

Rosemary Lever and Monique Sénéchal. 2011. Discussing stories: On how a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergartners? oral narrative construction. Journal of experimental child psychology, Vol. 108, 1 (2011), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.002

[29]

Zhixin Li and Ying Xu. 2023. Designing a realistic peer-like embodied conversational agent for supporting childrenbackslashtextquotesingle s storytelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.09399

[30]

Chaolan Lin, Selma vSabanović, Lynn Dombrowski, Andrew D Miller, Erin Brady, and Karl F MacDorman. 2021. Parental acceptance of children's storytelling robots: A projection of the uncanny valley of AI. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol. 8 (2021), 579993. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.579993

[31]

Joseph Lindley and Paul Coulton. 2015. Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI conference. 210--211. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783446.2783592

Digital Library

[32]

Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. " Like Having a Really Bad PA" The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 5286--5297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288

Digital Library

[33]

Patricia H Manz, Cheyenne Hughes, Ernesto Barnabas, Catherine Bracaliello, and Marika Ginsburg-Block. 2010. A descriptive review and meta-analysis of family-based emergent literacy interventions: To what extent is the research applicable to low-income, ethnic-minority or linguistically-diverse young children? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Vol. 25, 4 (2010), 409--431.

[34]

Joan Moyer, Harriet Egertson, and Joan Isenberg. 1987. The child-centered kindergarten. Childhood Education, Vol. 63, 4 (1987), 235--242.

[35]

Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. Child Development. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/childdevelopment/positiveparenting/preschoolers.html#: :text=Preschooler%20(3%2D5%20years%20old)%20%7C%20CDC

[36]

Luiza Superti Pantoja, Kyle Diederich, Liam Crawford, and Juan Pablo Hourcade. 2019. Voice agents supporting high-quality social play. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on interaction design and children. 314--325.

Digital Library

[37]

Katheryn Margaret Pascoe. 2022. Reflections on a systematic literature review: Questioning the (in) visibility of researcher positionality. Social Work Research, Vol. 46, 2 (2022), 176--180. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svac006

[38]

Jackie Peck. 1989. Using storytelling to promote language and literacy development. The Reading Teacher, Vol. 43, 2 (1989), 138--141.

[39]

Jean Piaget. 1976. Piaget's theory.

[40]

Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, Vol. 1, 8 (2019), 9.

[41]

Mitchel Resnick, John Maloney, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Natalie Rusk, Evelyn Eastmond, Karen Brennan, Amon Millner, Eric Rosenbaum, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman, et al. 2009. Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM, Vol. 52, 11 (2009), 60--67.

Digital Library

[42]

Sumita Sharma, Netta Iivari, Leena Ventä-Olkkonen, Heidi Hartikainen, and Marianne Kinnula. 2023. Inclusive Child-centered AI: Employing design futuring for Inclusive design of inclusive AI by and with children in Finland and India. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08041 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08041

[43]

Jiahong Su, Davy Tsz Kit Ng, and Samuel Kai Wah Chu. 2023. Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4 (2023), 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124

[44]

David R Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, Vol. 27, 2 (2006), 237--246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

[45]

Toycloud. [n.,d.]. Alpha Egg - An AI learning robot for children, that follows along and reads whatever you point at. https://www.toycloud.com/channels/198.html

[46]

Tiffany Tseng, Yumiko Murai, Natalie Freed, Deanna Gelosi, Tung D Ta, and Yoshihiro Kawahara. 2021. PlushPal: Storytelling with interactive plush toys and machine learning. In Interaction design and children. 236--245. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460694

Digital Library

[47]

UNICEF. 2021. Policy guidance on AI for children. (2021). https://www.unicef.org/globalinsight/media/2356/file/UNICEF-Global-Insight-policy-guidance-AI-children-2.0--2021.pdf

[48]

Asimina Vasalou, Sara Kalantari, Natalia Kucirkova, and Yvonne Vezzoli. 2020. Designing for oral storytelling practices at home: A parental perspective. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Vol. 26 (2020), 100214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100214

Digital Library

[49]

Dakuo Wang, Elizabeth Churchill, Pattie Maes, Xiangmin Fan, Ben Shneiderman, Yuanchun Shi, and Qianying Wang. 2020. From human-human collaboration to Human-AI collaboration: Designing AI systems that can work together with people. In Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--6.

[50]

Danli Wang, Liang He, and Keqin Dou. 2014. StoryCube: supporting children's storytelling with a tangible tool. The Journal of Supercomputing, Vol. 70 (2014), 269--283.

Digital Library

[51]

Dakuo Wang, Justin D Weisz, Michael Muller, Parikshit Ram, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Yla Tausczik, Horst Samulowitz, and Alexander Gray. 2019. Human-AI collaboration in data science: Exploring data scientists' perceptions of automated AI. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--24.

Digital Library

[52]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. `Don't make assumptions about me!': Understanding Children's Perception of Datafication Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555144

Digital Library

[53]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2022. Informing age-appropriate ai: Examining principles and practices of ai for children. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502057

Digital Library

[54]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2023. Treat me as your friend, not a number in your database: Co-designing with Children to Cope with Datafication Online. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580933

Digital Library

[55]

Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2024. Challenges and opportunities in translating ethical AI principles into practice for children. Nature Machine Intelligence (2024), 1--6.

[56]

Henk Wolda. 1981. Similarity indices, sample size and diversity. Oecologia, Vol. 50 (1981), 296--302.

[57]

Andrew Wright. 1995. Storytelling with children. Oxford University.

[58]

Tongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, and Carrie Jun Cai. 2022. Ai chains: Transparent and controllable human-ai interaction by chaining large language model prompts. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517582

Digital Library

[59]

Xuhai Xu, Bingsheng Yao, Yuanzhe Dong, Saadia Gabriel, Hong Yu, James Hendler, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Anind K Dey, and Dakuo Wang. 2024. Mental-llm: Leveraging large language models for mental health prediction via online text data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 8, 1 (2024), 1--32.

Digital Library

[60]

Ying Xu, Stacy Branham, Xinwei Deng, Penelope Collins, and Mark Warschauer. 2021. Are Current Voice Interfaces Designed to Support Children's Language Development. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445271

Digital Library

[61]

Ying Xu, Dakuo Wang, Penelope Collins, Hyelim Lee, and Mark Warschauer. 2021. Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children's reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner. Computers & Education, Vol. 161 (2021), 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104059

[62]

Ying Xu, Dakuo Wang, Mo Yu, Daniel Ritchie, Bingsheng Yao, Tongshuang Wu, Zheng Zhang, Toby Li, Nora Bradford, Branda Sun, et al. 2022. Fantastic Questions and Where to Find Them: FairytaleQA--An Authentic Dataset for Narrative Comprehension. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.34

[63]

Ying Xu and Mark Warschauer. 2020. Exploring young children's engagement in joint reading with a conversational agent. In Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference. 216--228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392063.3394417

Digital Library

[64]

Ying Xu and Mark Warschauer. 2020. What are you talking to: Understanding children's perceptions of conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.

Digital Library

[65]

Ziqi Yang, Xuhai Xu, Bingsheng Yao, Ethan Rogers, Shao Zhang, Stephen Intille, Nawar Shara, Guodong Gordon Gao, and Dakuo Wang. 2024. Talk2Care: An LLM-based Voice Assistant for Communication between Healthcare Providers and Older Adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Vol. 8, 2 (2024), 1--35.

Digital Library

[66]

Bingsheng Yao, Dakuo Wang, Tongshuang Wu, Zheng Zhang, Toby Li, Mo Yu, and Ying Xu. 2022. It is AI's Turn to Ask Humans a Question: Question-Answer Pair Generation for Children's Story Books. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 731--744. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.54

[67]

Kate Yen, Yeqi Chen, Yi Cheng, Sijin Chen, Ying-Yu Chen, Yiran Ni, and Alexis Hiniker. 2018. Joint media engagement between parents and preschoolers in the US, China, and Taiwan. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--19.

[68]

Andrea A Zevenbergen and Grover J Whitehurst. 2003. Dialogic reading: A shared picture book reading intervention for preschoolers. On reading books to children: Parents and teachers, Vol. 177 (2003), 200.

[69]

Zheng Zhang, Ying Xu, Yanhao Wang, Bingsheng Yao, Daniel Ritchie, Tongshuang Wu, Mo Yu, Dakuo Wang, and Toby Jia-Jun Li. 2022. Storybuddy: A human-ai collaborative chatbot for parent-child interactive storytelling with flexible parental involvement. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517479

Digital Library

[70]

Zhenjie Zhao, Yufang Hou, Dakuo Wang, Mo Yu, Chengzhong Liu, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2022. Educational Question Generation of Children Storybooks via Question Type Distribution Learning and Event-Centric Summarization. ACL'22 (2022).

[71]

Zhao Zhao and Rhonda McEwen. 2021. Luka Luka-investigating the interaction of children and their home Reading companion robot: A longitudinal remote study. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 141--143. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434074.3447146

Digital Library

Cited By

Ruiz-Rojas LSalvador-Ullauri LAcosta-Vargas P(2024)Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher EducationSustainability10.3390/su1613536716:13(5367)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

Index Terms

Exploring Parent's Needs for Children-Centered AI to Support Preschoolers' Interactive Storytelling and Reading Activities
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Young Children's Creative Storytelling with ChatGPT vs. Parent: Comparing Interactive Styles
CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Creative storytelling with parents plays an important role in child development including language skills, social competence, and emotional understanding. Recognizing the challenges parents face in finding time for storytelling due to work and home ...
Exploring Parent Use of Early STEM Media to Inform Design for Children
IDC '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

This paper explores how parents identify and use science and math media to engage their preschool children in informal science and math learning. Through an interview study, we examine parental beliefs about media's role in their preschool-aged children'...
Challenges and Opportunities for Interactive Technology to Support Parents of HIV-Positive Children in Ethiopia in the Disclosure Process
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Fearing stigma, parents often hide their children's HIV diagnosis from them, and postpone disclosure, in turn negatively impacting children's well-being. Our work explores whether interactive technology can support disclosure. In the first study, we ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 8, Issue CSCW2

CSCW

November 2024

5177 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3703902

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 November 2024

Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan project

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
232
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)232
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)75

Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ruiz-Rojas LSalvador-Ullauri LAcosta-Vargas P(2024)Collaborative Working and Critical Thinking: Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher EducationSustainability10.3390/su1613536716:13(5367)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents