Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
article

e-Government Adoptions in Developing Countries: A Sri Lankan Case Study

Published: 01 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a set of lessons learned from the adoption of an e-Government initiative in Sri Lanka. The case study presented in the paper is the e-Pensions project of the e-government initiative of the Government of Sri Lanka called "e-SriLanka". This is one of the first World Bank projects designed to bring Information Communication Technology ICT to every village, citizen, and business, and transform the way the government thinks and works. A set of lessons related to leadership, hidden cost, BPR, group dynamics, data migration, language issues, bureaucracy, training, change management, project governance, staff turnover and transitional projects were identified. While some of these lessons have been identified in the previous literature five such lessons have not been discussed previously. Those are transitional projects, language issues relating to software development processes, group dynamics, planning for data migration and staff turnover. Moreover, the study further revealed some interrelationship among these factors eg., how transitional projects can positively impact training and change management. Thus, these new insights relating to e-Government adoptions will shed some light into new e-government initiatives in developing countries with similar environments to Sri Lanka. Additionally, these new factors will contribute to enhancing e-Government adoption models.

References

[1]
Arcieri, F., Cappadozzi, E., Nardelli, E., & Talamo, M. 2001. SIM: A working example of an e-government service infrastructure for mountain communities. In Proceedings of 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications pp. 407-411.
[2]
Arif, M. 2008. Customer orientation in e-government project management: A case study. The Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 61, 1-10.
[3]
Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. 2008. Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 172, 165-176.
[4]
Carter, L., & Béélanger, F. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 151, 5-25.
[5]
Chan, M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. 2011. Managing e-government system implementation: A resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 529-541.
[6]
Chen, H. 2002. Digital government: Technologies and practices. Decision Support Systems, 34, 223-227.
[7]
Chen, Y. N., Chen, H. M., Huang, W., & Ching, R. K. H. 2006. e-Government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study. Journal of Global Information Management, 141, 23-46.
[8]
Corporate IT Resource Ltd. 2007. Business process re-enginering study for e-pensions project. Sri Lanka.
[9]
Esteves, J., & Joseph, R. C. 2008. A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 118-132.
[10]
Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. 2006. e-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development. Government Information Quarterly, 232, 207-235.
[11]
Grundén, K. 2009. A social perspective on implementation of e-government - a longitudinal study at the county administration of Sweden. Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 71, 65-76.
[12]
Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. 2003. E-Government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 204, 365-387.
[13]
Heeks, R. 2008. e-Government for development information exchange. Retrieved from http://www.egov4dev.org
[14]
Information and Communication Technology Agency of Sri Lanka ICTA, Sri Lanka. 2009. Policy and procedures for ICT usage in government e-Government Policy.
[15]
Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. 2003. e-Government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 389-394.
[16]
Kamal, M., Weerakkody, V., & Irani, Z. 2011. Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly, 282, 200-210.
[17]
Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., & Eck, D. V. 2001. Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities. Government Information Quarterly, 184, 293-307.
[18]
Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. 2004. Successful e-government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM, 476, 95-99.
[19]
Kifle, H., & Low Kim Cheng, P. 2009. e-Government implementation and leadership - the Brunei case study. Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 73, 271-282.
[20]
Markus, M. L. 1983. Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 266, 430-444.
[21]
Mimicopoulos, M. G. 2004. E-government funding activities and strategies. New York, NY: United Nations.
[22]
Ndou, V. 2004. E-government for developing countries:Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 181, 1-24.
[23]
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
[24]
Rajapakse, J. 2012. Impact of telecentres on Sri Lankan society. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Networking Technology, Republic of Korea.
[25]
Reddick, C. G., & Frank, H. A. 2007. The perceived impacts of E-Government on U.S. cities: A survey of Florida and Texas city managers. Government Information Quarterly, 243, 576-594.
[26]
Schwester, R. W. 2009. Examining the barriers to e-government adoption. Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 71, 113-122.
[27]
The Word Bank PREM Notes 2004. Building blocks of e-government: lessons from developing countries No 91.
[28]
Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. 2005. E-Government developments on delivering public services among EU cities. Government Information Quarterly, 222, 217-238.
[29]
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Public sector digital transformation barriersInformation Polity10.3233/IP-22001728:1(5-27)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2018)Effective Leadership in BPM Implementations: A Case Study of BPM in a Developing Country, Public Sector ContextBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_22(376-391)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2018

Index Terms

  1. e-Government Adoptions in Developing Countries: A Sri Lankan Case Study
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Electronic Government Research
    International Journal of Electronic Government Research  Volume 9, Issue 4
    October 2013
    91 pages
    ISSN:1548-3886
    EISSN:1548-3894
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    IGI Global

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 October 2013

    Author Tags

    1. Case Study
    2. Developing Countries
    3. E-Government
    4. Information Communication Technology ICT
    5. Public Sector

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Public sector digital transformation barriersInformation Polity10.3233/IP-22001728:1(5-27)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
    • (2018)Effective Leadership in BPM Implementations: A Case Study of BPM in a Developing Country, Public Sector ContextBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_22(376-391)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2018

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media