Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Generalized Halton sequences in 2008: A comparative study

Published: 04 November 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Halton sequences have always been quite popular with practitioners, in part because of their intuitive definition and ease of implementation. However, in their original form, these sequences have also been known for their inadequacy to integrate functions in moderate to large dimensions, in which case (t,s)-sequences such as the Sobol' sequence are usually preferred. To overcome this problem, one possible approach is to include permutations in the definition of Halton sequences—thereby obtaining generalized Halton sequences—an idea that goes back to almost thirty years ago, and that has been studied by many researchers in the last few years. In parallel to these efforts, an important improvement in the upper bounds for the discrepancy of Halton sequences has been made by Atanassov in 2004. Together, these two lines of research have revived the interest in Halton sequences. In this article, we review different generalized Halton sequences that have been proposed recently, and compare them by means of numerical experiments. We also propose a new generalized Halton sequence which, we believe, offers a practical advantage over the surveyed constructions, and that should be of interest to practitioners.

Supplementary Material

Faure Appendix (a15-faure-apndx.pdf)
Online appendix to generalized Halton sequences in 2008: A comparative study. The appendix supports the information on article 15.

References

[1]
Atanassov, E. 2004. On the discrepancy of the Halton sequences. Mathematica Balkanica 18, 15--32.
[2]
Atanassov, E. and Durchova, M. 2003. Generating and testing the modified Halton sequences. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Numerical Methods and Applications, Borovets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2542. Springer, Berlin, 91--98.
[3]
Bach, E. and Shallit, J. 1996. Algorithmic Number Theory. Vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[4]
Braaten, E. and Weller, G. 1979. An improved low-discrepancy sequence for multidimensional quasi-Monte Carlo integration. J. Computat. Phys. 33, 249--258.
[5]
Caflisch, R. E., Morokoff, W., and Owen, A. B. 1997. Valuation of mortgage-backed securities using Brownian bridges to reduce effective dimension. J. Computat. Fin. 1, 1, 27--46.
[6]
Cheng, J. and Druzdzel, M. 2000. Computational investigation of low-discrepancy sequences in simulation algorithms for bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 72--81.
[7]
Chi, H., Mascagni, M., and Warnock, T. 2005. On the optimal Halton sequence. Math. Computers Simul. 70, 9--21.
[8]
Faure, H. 1978. Discrépance de suites associées à un système de numération. Comptes Rendus Mathematique 286-A, Acadamy of Science, Paris, 293--296.
[9]
Faure, H. 1982. Discrépance des suites associées à un système de numération (en dimension s). Acta Arithmetica 41, 337--351.
[10]
Faure, H. 1986. On the star-discrepancy of generalized Hammersley sequences in two dimensions. Monatsh. Math. 101, 291--300.
[11]
Faure, H. 1992. Good permutations for extreme discrepancy. J. Number Theor. 42, 1, 47--56.
[12]
Faure, H. 2005. Discrepancy and diaphony of digital (0,1)-sequences in prime base. Acta Arithmetica 117, 125--148.
[13]
Faure, H. 2006. Selection criteria for (random) generation of digital (0,s)-sequences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, H. Niederreiter and D. Talay, Eds. Springer, Berlin, 113--126.
[14]
Halton, J. H. 1960. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numerische Mathematik 2, 84--90.
[15]
Kocis, L. and Whiten, W. J. 1997. Computational investigations of low-discrepancy sequences. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 23, 2, 266--294.
[16]
Kritzer, P. 2006. Improved upper bounds on the star discrepancy of (t,m,s)-nets and (t,s)-sequences. J. Complexity 22, 336--347.
[17]
L'Ecuyer, P. and Lemieux, C. 2002. Recent advances in randomized quasi-Monte Carlo methods. In Modeling Uncertainty: An Examination of Stochastic Theory, Methods, and Applications, M. Dror, P. L'Ecuyer, and F. Szidarovszki, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 419--474.
[18]
Lemieux, C. and Owen, A. 2001. Quasi-regression and the relative importance of the ANOVA components of a function. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, K.-T. Fang, F. J. Hickernell, and H. Niederreiter, Eds. Springer, 331--344.
[19]
Mascagni, M. and Chi, H. 2004. On the scrambled Halton sequence. Monte Carlo Meth. Appl. 10, 435--442.
[20]
Matousěk, J. 1998. On the L2-discrepancy for anchored boxes. J. Complexity 14, 527--556.
[21]
Morokoff, W. J. and Caflisch, R. E. 1994. Quasi-random sequences and their discrepancies. SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 15, 1251--1279.
[22]
Niederreiter, H. 1978. Quasi-Monte Carlo methods and pseudorandom numbers. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84, 6, 957--1041.
[23]
Niederreiter, H. 1987. Point sets and sequences with small discrepancy. Monatsh. Math. 104, 273--337.
[24]
Niederreiter, H. 1988. Low discrepancy and low dispersion sequences. J. Number Theory 30, 51--70.
[25]
Niederreiter, H. 1992. Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. SIAM CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 63. SIAM, Philadelphia.
[26]
Niederreiter, H. and Xing, C. 1996. Quasirandom points and global function fields. In Finite Fields and Applications. London Mathematical Society. Lecture Note Series, vol. 233. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 269--296.
[27]
Ninomiya, S. and Tezuka, S. 1996. Toward real-time pricing of complex financial derivatives. Appl. Math. Fin. 3, 1--20.
[28]
Owen, A. B. 1995. Randomly permuted (t,m,s)-nets and (t,s)-sequences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing, H. Niederreiter and P. J.-S. Shiue, Eds. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 106, Springer, Berlin, 299--317.
[29]
Owen, A. B. 2003. The dimension distribution and quadrature test functions. Stat. Sinica 13, 1--17.
[30]
Pagès, G. 1992. Van der Corput sequences, Kakutani transforms and one-dimensional numerical integration. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 44, 21--39.
[31]
Papageorgiou, A. and Traub, J. 1997. Faster evaluation of multidimensional integrals. Comput. Phys. 11, 547--578.
[32]
Paskov, S. and Traub, J. 1995. Faster valuation of financial derivatives. J. Portfolio Manage. 22, 113--120.
[33]
Radovic, I., Sobol', I. M., and Tichy, R. F. 1996. Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for numerical integration: Comparison of different low-discrepancy sequences. Monte Carlo Methods Appl. 2, 1--14.
[34]
Schürer, R. and Schmid, W. 2006. MinT: A database for optimal net parameters. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, H. Niederreiter and D. Talay, Eds. Springer, Berlin, 457--469.
[35]
Sobol', I. M. 1967. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput. Math. and Math. Phys. 7, 86--112.
[36]
Sobol', I. M. and Asotsky, D. I. 2003. One more experiment on estimating high-dimensional integrals by quasi-Monte Carlo methods. Math. Comput. Simul. 62, 255--263.
[37]
Struckmeier, J. 1995. Fast generation of low-discrepancy sequences. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 91, 29--41.
[38]
Tezuka, S. 1993. Polynomial arithmetic analogue of Halton sequences. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 3, 99--107.
[39]
Tezuka, S. 1995. Uniform Random Numbers: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
[40]
Tuffin, B. 1998. A new permutation choice in Halton sequences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, P. Hellekalek, G. Larcher, H. Niederreiter, and P. Zinterhof, Eds. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 127. Springer, Berlin, New York, 427--435.
[41]
Vandewoestyne, B. and Cools, R. 2006. Good permutations for deterministic scrambled Halton sequences in terms of L2-discrepancy. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 189, 341--361.
[42]
Wang, X. and Hickernell, F. J. 2000. Randomized Halton sequences. Math. Comput. Model. 32, 887--899.
[43]
Wang, X. and Sloan, I. H. 2005. Why are high-dimensional finance problems of low effective dimension? SIAM J. Scient. Comput. 27, 159--183.
[44]
Warnock, T. 1972. Computational investigations of low discrepancy point sets. In Application de la théorie des nombres à l'analyse numérique, S. Zaremba, Ed. Academic Press, New York, 319--343.
[45]
Warnock, T. 1995. Computational investigations of low discrepancy point sets ii. In Proceedings of the Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing. H. Niederreiter and P. J.-S. Shiue, Eds. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 106, Springer, Berlin, 354--361.
[46]
Warnock, T. 2002. Effective error estimates for quasi-Monte Carlo computations. Manuscript. public.lanl.gov/kmh/uncertainty/meetings/warnvgr.pdf.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gain Coefficients for Scrambled Halton PointsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis10.1137/23M160188262:3(1021-1038)Online publication date: 2-May-2024
  • (2024)Fast Bayesian Inference for Spatial Mean-Parameterized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson ModelsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics10.1080/10618600.2024.2394460(1-18)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating low-discrepancy point sets via graph neural networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10.1073/pnas.2409913121121:40Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 19, Issue 4
October 2009
151 pages
ISSN:1049-3301
EISSN:1558-1195
DOI:10.1145/1596519
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 November 2009
Accepted: 01 November 2008
Revised: 01 May 2008
Received: 01 June 2007
Published in TOMACS Volume 19, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Halton sequences
  2. discrepancy
  3. permutations
  4. scrambling

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gain Coefficients for Scrambled Halton PointsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis10.1137/23M160188262:3(1021-1038)Online publication date: 2-May-2024
  • (2024)Fast Bayesian Inference for Spatial Mean-Parameterized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson ModelsJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics10.1080/10618600.2024.2394460(1-18)Online publication date: 21-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating low-discrepancy point sets via graph neural networksProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10.1073/pnas.2409913121121:40Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Adaptive Hyperparameter Tuning Within Neural Network-Based Efficient Global OptimizationComputational Science – ICCS 202410.1007/978-3-031-63775-9_6(74-89)Online publication date: 2-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Quasi-Monte Carlo Algorithms (Not Only) for Graphics SoftwareMonte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods10.1007/978-3-031-59762-6_18(373-391)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Discrepancy-based inference for intractable generative models using Quasi-Monte CarloElectronic Journal of Statistics10.1214/23-EJS213117:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Stiff-PDEs and Physics-Informed Neural NetworksArchives of Computational Methods in Engineering10.1007/s11831-023-09890-4Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
  • (2023)A Resolvent Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Estimating the Minimum Eigenvalues Using the Error BalancingLarge-Scale Scientific Computations10.1007/978-3-031-56208-2_40(394-403)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Bayesian Networks as Approximations of Biochemical NetworksComputer Performance Engineering and Stochastic Modelling10.1007/978-3-031-43185-2_15(216-233)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2023
  • (2022)A multi-body dynamical evolution model for generating the point set with best uniformitySwarm and Evolutionary Computation10.1016/j.swevo.2022.10112173(101121)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media